820485_Routine Inspection_20241002

xevrew
for Visit: -0—Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral
Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /Q Arrival Time: s'6 / y Departure Time: County: C � Region:
Farm Name: lij'�%�G�c4�LdG�2dl t2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: iit��� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: (�^ YJA/D7AI 1/9,46
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator: r
Certification Number:'��(y
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F=�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

FacilityNumber: - Date of Inspection: / 02
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes f :] P ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [-]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes—Ej"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes J:j-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
,C74'les ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes 4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes j�jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes _,[] -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
11
12. Crop Type(s): Z/1 , (4) I'
13. Soil Type(s): )a Q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes_ -❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ,❑Yes j o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes PFNo
❑ Yes Q-No
❑ Yes Q-No
❑ Yes Q-No
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (E�No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes Q-No
❑ Yes j:1-.No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes �'No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes , �o NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Ej Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Ej Yes JD -No Ej NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes allo Ej NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes L3-No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
Ej Yes []-No
NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes Q-No
NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes E3-No
NA
NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes M No
NA
NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ,E]No
Ej NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes Q: No
NA
❑ NE
-7) ngeW -/v 1-776-K-� ;f �n , "e�" 44&f'�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: L910 %J s—
Date:
511212020

ractlay NO. 6�� _ z D � Time In Time Out
lx _
Farm Name x*ee?/ �� Integrato}
Owner Site Rec.
Operator No.
Back-up No. _
COC Circle: General . or NPDES
Date
Design
Current T I Current
Wean - Feed
I Farrow - Feed
Wean- Finish
I Farrow - Finish
Feed :Finish
I Gift/ Boars
Farrow -.Wean
I I Othem
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test ��d 7 Wettable Acres —�
Weekly Freeboard I/ Daily Rairdalt V
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Insoections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
l9
Sludge Survey 1E=1�� , �3
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)