820088_Routine Inspection_20241011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: —(D Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: 1--,el)
Farm Name: i� �,,, _ ��ey�e-r Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �j Q� y ��,Ar �G✓ Title:
OnsiteRepresentative: �t
Certified Operator: h
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes __L2'IQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes �❑-go
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes -[3-,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—]Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: A_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 101
r
Observed Freeboard (in): O9J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes JNo NA
�—❑
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes _❑`No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,E3'No . ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
,_[�-No
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes .E�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes -[D-No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ..ED-No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application of ApprovedArea
�Outside
ep�
12. Crop Type(s): (lalift'aj
13. Soil Type(s): 01) Cho /r� 04.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ,^No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [—]Yes ,❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ;�,No
❑ Yes ©-No
❑ Yes _E3-No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,"Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield P120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A 'No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes .®"No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facifi Number: - S15K I Date of Inspection:
d
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes J:J�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
aG
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon /
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: `!�6 (,a
/
. & '7 i,3c)
lo! l
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes .E No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes -ETNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes 21"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ,�yNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes .&No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNIP? ❑ Yes El'No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 2rNo
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes L�-1Qo
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: /O / /Ul a c/
511212020

NO. y ,;,2 T1 In
Time Out
racmry
Farm Name 6lmxzi
tntegraV.
Site Bee,
Owner
Operator
No. _
Back-up
No. _
HOC Circle: General ,
or NPDES
Dace
Des' n
Current I I Design Current I
Wean — Feed
Farrow — Feed
Wean— Finish
Farrow — Firiis`
Feed _ Finish
I
j Gilts / Boars
Farrow —.Wean
( I Otherp
Sludge Survey 36
iv ��/
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Calibration/GPM
Crop Yield
Waste Transfers
Rain Gauge
Rain Breaker
Soil Test ion �— Wettable Acres PLAT
Weekly Freeboard _j
Daily Rainfall i-< 1-in Inspections
er Drug
l•����
eaer
�Nathther CodCodes �
weCodes
120 min Inspections �,�.Y�/
Waste Analysis:
Date
/ y
Nitrogen(N) ,5 ;-d6-3g-'trogen(N)
Pod
ialila:o