HomeMy WebLinkAbout820520_Routine Inspection_20241007Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: `� County: Region:
Farm Name: "I'K"1�,ypd Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ; 1eTitle:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: `/ . ze—
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Integrator: !fr'61CJ��
i
Certification Number:Qy
Certification Number: 77(0
Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes.Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4.�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I o. f 3 511212020 Continued
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: /`D`. as/
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes _j ] No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I
Identifier:
Spillway?:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �}
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrityofof any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Cj`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
El Yes ❑ No
El NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes .Ej'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes L2'1<0
❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 0?Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes & No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -Efr'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable -Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): t . ) �igrir I <-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?'
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑
❑ Yes E5-No
❑ Yes ED'No
❑ Yes 4EJ'No
❑ Yes _(2-No
❑ Yes EfrNo
❑ Yes ,?rNo
❑ Yes "No
Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -DNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis
y ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EjNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes &No
Page 2 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
511212020 Continued
Facility Number: Date of Ins ection: 7 3
24. Did the facility fail to Ib t
ca i ra e waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2No NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes 12'No NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes e'No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes'L3'110 M NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes .:^No NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Yes Jallo NA Ej NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes allo NA NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Ej Yes LNo NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Yes .e'No NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes „® No Ej NA Ej NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
M Yes F_11W I —I NY r—i XTU
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9io
Date: /D1.7/;) V
511212020
racurry NO. 710� �TV Time In Time Out
Farm Name rizr`t.vey Integraow
Owner P Site Rep
Operator No.
Back-up No.
COC Circle: General or NPDES
Dare
Wean — Feed
Des' n
Current Design Current
Farrow — Feed
Wean— Finish
Farrow — Firilsh
Feed _ Finish
Gilts / Boars
Farrow —.Wean
I I Othem
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard __4�-- Daily Rainfall
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
7 — —
Sludge Survey ' / 7/ a �/ l
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
—
Date Nitrogen (N)