HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0045464_More Information (Requested)_20240819ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS,]R.
Director
ANDREw ROSS — MANAGER
PEA RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
341 KILMAYNE DRIVE — SUITE 201
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27511
Dear Mr. Ross,
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 19, 2024
Subject: Application No. WQ0045464
Additional Information Request #1
Firefly Overlook — Lot 20 SFR
Single -Family Residence
Wastewater Irrigation System
Chatham County
Division of Water Resources' Central and Regional staff have reviewed the application package
received on May 30, 2024. However, the Division requires additional information before completing our
review. Please address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on September 18,
2024.
Please be aware that the Applicant is responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North
Carolina rules and regulations. The Applicant is also responsible for any oversights that occur during the
review of the subject application package. The Division may return the application as incomplete pursuant
to 15A NCAC 02T .0107(e)(2) if any omissions are made when responding to the outstanding items in
Sections A through O or the Applicant fails to provide the additional information on or before the above -
requested date.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. The
Applicant shall sign, seal, and date (where applicable) all revised and/or additional documentation and
submit an electronic response to my attention via the Non -Discharge online portal.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (919) 707-3655 or
cord.anthony(kdeq.nc.gov. Thank you for your cooperation.
Docu Signed by:
Sincerely,
2D03237162FA4E5...
Cord Anthony, Engineer II
Division of Water Resources
cc: Chatham Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy)
John R. Harman, PE — Professional Consulting Engineer (Electronic Copy)
Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy)
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
n^w�e^e �i.^m^^�� n^^�� 919.707.9000
Mr. Andrew Ross
August 19, 2024
Page 2 of 3
A. Overall:
1. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(a), the Applicant shall maintain for drip irrigation sites: (1) a
minimum 50 foot setback to each property line and (2) a minimum 100 foot setback to each
habitable residence under separate ownership. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(b), the Applicant
shall maintain for treatment and storage units: (1) a minimum 50 foot setback to each property line
and (2) a minimum 100 foot setback to each habitable residence under separate ownership.
Currently, Pea Ridge Developers, LLC, owns the parent Parcel No. 0018070 that Chatham County
will subdivide for Firefly Overlook. Based on the Chatham County GIS and the submitted
application package, Lot 20 SFR (Future Parcel No. 0096757) will not meet the setback
requirements listed above for the adjacent Lot 19 (Future Parcel No. 0096756) and Lot 21 (Future
Parcel No. 0096758) when the Applicant sells the properties to the future homeowners.
While setback waivers are not required at this time, the Division strongly recommends that the
Applicant obtain all setback waivers pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(c) in their name based on
the proposed subdivision layout to avoid inconvenience for future homeowners. Otherwise, the
Division will issue this permit for construction only until we receive all recorded setback waivers.
B. Cover Letter:
1. No Comments.
C. Application Fee:
1. No Comments.
D. Application (Form: SFRWWIS 06-16):
1. No Comments.
E. Property Ownership Documentation:
1. No Comments.
F. Setback Waivers:
1. No Comments.
G. Soil Evaluation:
A 54.0% drainage coefficient is being proposed. Per the DWR Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy and
the EPA Process Design Manual: Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater Effluent (EPA 625/R-
06/016), a DC of 4-10% is recommended. How has the recommended drainage coefficient been
determined? Additionally, there is a large variance in drainage coefficient between this site and
surrounding lots despite very close proximity and similar soil types. Please explain the reasoning
for this variance
Mr. Andrew Ross
August 19, 2024
Page 3 of 3
H. Engineering Plans:
1. No Comments.
I. Specifications:
1. No Comments.
J. Engineering Calculations:
1. No Comments.
K. Site Map•
1. No Comments.
L. Operation & Maintenance Plan:
1. No Comments.
M. Operation & Maintenance Agreement (Form: SFRWWIS-O&M 09-18):
1. No Comments.
N. Additional Documentation:
➢ County Health Department Denial Letter:
1. No Comments.
➢ Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Documentation:
1. No Comments.
O. Recommendations (Response not required):
1. No Comments.