Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0045464_More Information (Requested)_20240819ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary RICHARD E. ROGERS,]R. Director ANDREw ROSS — MANAGER PEA RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC 341 KILMAYNE DRIVE — SUITE 201 CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27511 Dear Mr. Ross, NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality August 19, 2024 Subject: Application No. WQ0045464 Additional Information Request #1 Firefly Overlook — Lot 20 SFR Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigation System Chatham County Division of Water Resources' Central and Regional staff have reviewed the application package received on May 30, 2024. However, the Division requires additional information before completing our review. Please address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on September 18, 2024. Please be aware that the Applicant is responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. The Applicant is also responsible for any oversights that occur during the review of the subject application package. The Division may return the application as incomplete pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0107(e)(2) if any omissions are made when responding to the outstanding items in Sections A through O or the Applicant fails to provide the additional information on or before the above - requested date. Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. The Applicant shall sign, seal, and date (where applicable) all revised and/or additional documentation and submit an electronic response to my attention via the Non -Discharge online portal. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (919) 707-3655 or cord.anthony(kdeq.nc.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. Docu Signed by: Sincerely, 2D03237162FA4E5... Cord Anthony, Engineer II Division of Water Resources cc: Chatham Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy) John R. Harman, PE — Professional Consulting Engineer (Electronic Copy) Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy) D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 NORTH CAROLINA n^w�e^e �i.^m^^�� n^^�� 919.707.9000 Mr. Andrew Ross August 19, 2024 Page 2 of 3 A. Overall: 1. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(a), the Applicant shall maintain for drip irrigation sites: (1) a minimum 50 foot setback to each property line and (2) a minimum 100 foot setback to each habitable residence under separate ownership. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(b), the Applicant shall maintain for treatment and storage units: (1) a minimum 50 foot setback to each property line and (2) a minimum 100 foot setback to each habitable residence under separate ownership. Currently, Pea Ridge Developers, LLC, owns the parent Parcel No. 0018070 that Chatham County will subdivide for Firefly Overlook. Based on the Chatham County GIS and the submitted application package, Lot 20 SFR (Future Parcel No. 0096757) will not meet the setback requirements listed above for the adjacent Lot 19 (Future Parcel No. 0096756) and Lot 21 (Future Parcel No. 0096758) when the Applicant sells the properties to the future homeowners. While setback waivers are not required at this time, the Division strongly recommends that the Applicant obtain all setback waivers pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0606(c) in their name based on the proposed subdivision layout to avoid inconvenience for future homeowners. Otherwise, the Division will issue this permit for construction only until we receive all recorded setback waivers. B. Cover Letter: 1. No Comments. C. Application Fee: 1. No Comments. D. Application (Form: SFRWWIS 06-16): 1. No Comments. E. Property Ownership Documentation: 1. No Comments. F. Setback Waivers: 1. No Comments. G. Soil Evaluation: A 54.0% drainage coefficient is being proposed. Per the DWR Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy and the EPA Process Design Manual: Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater Effluent (EPA 625/R- 06/016), a DC of 4-10% is recommended. How has the recommended drainage coefficient been determined? Additionally, there is a large variance in drainage coefficient between this site and surrounding lots despite very close proximity and similar soil types. Please explain the reasoning for this variance Mr. Andrew Ross August 19, 2024 Page 3 of 3 H. Engineering Plans: 1. No Comments. I. Specifications: 1. No Comments. J. Engineering Calculations: 1. No Comments. K. Site Map• 1. No Comments. L. Operation & Maintenance Plan: 1. No Comments. M. Operation & Maintenance Agreement (Form: SFRWWIS-O&M 09-18): 1. No Comments. N. Additional Documentation: ➢ County Health Department Denial Letter: 1. No Comments. ➢ Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Documentation: 1. No Comments. O. Recommendations (Response not required): 1. No Comments.