Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout790001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20241009 Division of Water Resources Facility Number �� - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency E pe of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 1[�,��¢� Arrival Time: I?�r j ,�„„� Departure Time:[�> � County: iYY.'�1C1m Region: ((� Farm Name: F`���(�\-`��T ' m �Ao2� 7VGY—m Owner Email: ��l y���ke� C)cn' �� l� C{m(x i 1 (..K.nn Owner Name: �c^tilt'�I 4JQ�1C��' Phone: 1L 7 - Mailing Address: JzJ7)�j "?��l YIA_� o Physical Address: �; Z7 2_ 1 D 2- Facility Contact: V rczC� < Title: 'NtiJ�Y1�uiCii� Phone %�� - ► -1�j Z� J Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: V Certification Number: j Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: - lU;25 Z,Z" Longitude: -101 ltwy tL }}�.+� 15ti Hwy 1 �, 7.1 Z�� 1�1 > >t}Wy �u� E`, �� Cnzwcle�r IPA Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Lhon-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey POUItS Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5(No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) EA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes $;a�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [2<4Q ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: i p ri Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes —F4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes�E❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? XYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? ��\ If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Oyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes )5?—No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes `�No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? �� Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? T 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 4y k 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes `�No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? T� 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes��No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes RN ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement? %Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application _Mweekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ We r Code linfall ❑Sleeking•❑�`ield ❑120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections urve 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ��❑ No )j�NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - > Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No _NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ;2(NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes JSeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No 'S�NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes '�KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes C21�44.o ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). 5: C-iv ' Ski 1\ooa>M nv�,bw�can h►ti Ir°1e;hy'\s 4 ad&dwk t 1W%re. \11Aj�UW , \Wa a,16�- bA x Zt• SONS �1 '.� a mWNV _n 25 21 WOW, "O foY�N >ro Conc�lm�r(uYaraQp�c Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 336,-1-71D-FlVT] Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 10111 2A- Page 3 of 3 21412015