Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820038_routine_20240905.; °� , a � � ,<I7►ivisio� of Water Re�ourcesr Facile Number T;rvision gof Soil and Water Conservatton 'i��Is� J Other A envy': n , Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: F-j Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Farm Name: �'I� V i �4 Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Region: Wl Facility Contact: o mi Title: te)j { Phone: Onsite Representative: �1 ll Integrator: (l°,�rpj (1 1i �I NS Certification Number: Certified Operator: 1 Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current ; p i)esign Current Capacity I'op Wet Poultry Capacity Pap Cattle Capacafy p. Po Swine Wean to Finish<; Layer Dairy Cow -`- [] Wean to Feeder Non -Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design ` Current' Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder DryPoaltr `'Cad ac t. r Po � Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish I Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars �" Pullets - Beef Brood Cow IT Other TurkeyPoults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued A aro ti ti N 0 0 K N CD 0 d C CD eb a CD pCI CD ❑ CD W 0 -P" O �•�y n El ° CD (D y CD O N 0 �l x CD CD ° ° a O cn o CD CD CD C� w C CD ❑ b ro C w CL `. �C CD ❑ w a C � ❑ O w x CD w m ❑ 9 J w O ° a> CD P > CD G w CD C N CD N W N ❑ ❑ d � CD CD CD CD a ❑ �. 0 o0 0 O w ❑ ❑ w o C aCD W CD CD a' w ❑ m � a N �• O O LiG J CD �w o CD CD o w CD 0 W W ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ a a a a Gn K CD zz trJ C�7 CD t�7 CD 0 W W ❑ ❑ 00 ❑ ❑ Y Y m tt 8-0 J O\ CIi w C7 C7 a co CD In Cl) CD CD CD �* P CD CD ID ID • cD CD CD a w O CD o a o w w 10 �. O n � CD �. CD CD CD Ca. a CD CD O v CD CD 21 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD ti W W M W ❑ ❑ 000 00 000 ❑ ❑ 000 � a z a a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m tt m M M W CIO 0. H CD N � O b CD C rn CD CD CD CCD CD < ,� ❑`)0 ° n CD 'd a 0 Q a V CD _ o CDC`(D n o ❑0 o � � 0 ch O F ❑ CD C O ❑ H w C w VD CD 0CD CD 0 O O N � o w a w• C ° w � CD O CwD CD o � � 0 O CD M _ O CD CD CD �i aEl W o bCD v z a 5' o O CD w ❑ CD y O sa 'r w CD CD ° CD C w o `� o C. o a. CD � r 0 CD CD J y W CD o' w x 0 0 O �U CD CD w CD w CD w CD CD ° a w CD CD tJ 0 CD CD O C P CD R7 C C cn � ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ M 4 00 J 00 0 1)w w `C CD rD CD CD UQ °� °, w • D CD• DCD a 0. ao CD CD n a o r° ° R 0 0 p a o CC"D CD o CD �i o '"t' CD CDCD CL W ` C) W CD CD CD 2 O~ CCD CD O CD 'S• H `C CD er fD cnCD r' CD w. w ,�'3• CD M ti n cn Q7 w CD CD J n C-D "C3 "�S cow G CD �w ."'KS' CD 0 ° CD CD w .t CD Ly CD CD K i CDcn O (�D o m O 0 CD CDCD W c, CD C a. `C CD r. 711 0 O CD W N CD w J CD CD W c 0. CD y a CD CD ` — "' ° CD cic:lD - w CA '`D w tj 0 W En 'r D CD w ?r' r CD pJCD � w CD 0 CD C w J 4 o � ❑' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 CD CD CD CD 0 CD W W W W W W CD 00�0000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ AeD * rn a > > > > a ❑yG. ❑.. d ❑,.� El ❑yG ❑ 111 l`1 M M l+I Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE r 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon I- 11 List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ` , \ No DNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes '❑/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE i ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE i c ❑ Yes rV1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE r. 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes / No PP11 ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations orany other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: r Dater I 511212020