NCG510125_Complete File_19970115

x
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
HOWARD STEED ENV
WYSONG AND MILES
P0BOX 21168
January 15, 1997
SAFETY MGR.
COMPANY
GREENSBORO NC 27420
Dear Mr. Steed:
/�
® FE F::1
Subject: Rescission of NPDES General Permit No. NCG510125
Wysong & Miles Company
Guilford County
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject NPDES General Permit.
Staff of the Winston - Salem Regional Office have confirmed that the facility no longer needs this
groundwater remediation permit. Therefore, in accordance with your request, NPDES General
Permit No. NCG510125 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If in the future you again need a NPDES General Permit to discharge to the State's surface
waters, you must first apply for and receive a new NPDES Permit. Discharging without a valid
NPDES Permit will subject the discharger to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day.
If it would be helpful to discuss this matter further, I would suggest that you contact Steve
Mauney, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, Winston-Salem Regional Office at 910/771-4600.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Guilford County Health Department
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Groundwater Regional Supervisor - Wattachments
Groundwater Section - Permits & Compliance Unit - w/attachments
Permits & Engineering Unit - Dave Goodrich- w/attachments
Operator Training and Certification
Facilities Assessment Unit - Robert Farmer - w/attachments
Central Files - w/attachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
0

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Robert Farmer
THROUGH: Steve Mauney
FROM: Ron Linville %
SUBJECT: Wysong and Miles Permit Rescission Request
NPDES Permit No: NCG510125
Guilford County
DATE: 961218
Mr. Bill Finger, Asst. Utilities Director with the City of
Greensboro, verified on this date (by telephone) that this
remediation discharge is tributary to the City's POTW. Based on
this information the Region has no objection to the rescission
and voidance of this permit as long as the rescission letter
indicates that any future discharges will require appropriate
permits or subject the facility to civil penalties for
discharging without a permit, etc.
KtUtIVED
DEC 2 U 1414
Flo" 'TIES ASSESSMENT 0141T

CERTIFICATION OF PERMIT INACTIVATION
FACILITY NAME
PERMIT NO.
REGIONAL OFFICE
COUNTY
LTV .S
ic1G� si o/ems
GJ --
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONFIRMED BY
{ 'PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
{ } SITE VISIT
e 1� �j/I.
THAT THIS FACILITY NO LONGER NEEDS THE ABOVE
REFERENCED PERMIT BECAUSE THE FACILITY WAS
{ } NEVER CONSTRUCTED {v} OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
{ } ABANDONED 74- K' -o /"'07-J
THIS PERMIT SHOULD BE DELETED FROM THE PERMIT
TRACKING SYSTEM AND THE DIVISION BILLING SYSTEM
AND IF NECESSARY INACTIVATED ON THE COMPLIANCE
MONITORING SYSTEM.
CERTHUR'S NAME
DATE / 2-

Letter to HUGH T. HICKS
NCG510125.
INVOICE FOR RENEWAL OF
NPDES PERMIT
® Check here if you do NOT wish to renew this permit.
Please return this page along with a letter documenting your reasons
for not requesting renewal to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality/WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
❑ Check here if you wish to renew this permit.
Please verify that the following information is documented accurately:
Mailing Address
HUGH T. HICKS
WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
P.O. BOX 21168
GREENSBORO , NC 27420
Facilitv Location
HUGH T. HICKS
WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
4820 US 29 NORTH
GREENSBORO , NC 27420
❑ No revision required.
November 26,1996
❑ Revision required. (Please specify below.)
❑ No revision required.
PRevision required. (Please specify below.)
.M. TIN I= NUM071
I�
Please return this page with your letter requesting renewal, and $400 fee (payable to NCDEHNR) to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality/WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Signature of applicant or authorized representative �-
Date ii-ns_or

Ln_/ U
Prerishm Shearing & I arming Systems
December 5, 1996
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality / WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Non -renewal NPDES General Permit No. NCG510125 /
Individual Permit No. NCO027553
rs
As Wysong & Miles Company is operating under Special Discharge Permit issued by the
City of Greensboro, North Carolina - Permit No. S-2021, which authorizes discharge of
wastewater from a groundwater reclamation into the City of Greensboro Sanitary Sewer
System to the North Buffalo Wastewater Treatment Facility in accordance with the
limitations and conditions set forth in the permit.
Sincerely,
Howard Steed
Environmental/Safety Manager
4820 U.S. 29 North
Wysong & Miles Company
P.O. Box 21168 • Greensboro, NC 27420-1168 • Tel. [phone] • Fax [phone]
American Craftsmanship Since 1903

�reclsiosr�Shearingt6�ForlrtirigS�stems-'{^
December 5, 1996
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality / WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Non -renewal NPDES General Permit No. NCG510125 /
Individual Permit No. NCO027553
As Wysong & Miles Company is operating under Special Discharge Permit issued by the
City of Greensboro, North Carolina - Permit No. S-2021, which authorizes discharge of
wastewater from a groundwater reclamation into the City of Greensboro Sanitary Sewer
System to the North Buffalo Wastewater Treatment Facility in accordance with the
limitations and conditions set forth in the permit.
Sincerely,
WYYS,O JNG & MILES COMPANY
Howard Steed
Environmental/Safety Manager
Wysong & Miles Company
4820 U.S. 29 North • P.O. Box 21168 • Greensboro, NC 27420-1168 • Tel. [phone] Fax [phone]
American Craftsmanship Since 190

Letter to HUGH T. HICKS
NCG510125
November 26,1996
INVOICE FOR RENEWAL OF
NPDES PERMIT
® Check here if you do NOT wish to renew this permit.
Please return this page along with a letter documenting your reasons
for not requesting renewal to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality/WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Check here if you wish to renew this permit.
Please verify that the following information is documented accurately:
Mailing Address
HUGH T. HICKS
WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
P.O. BOX 21168
GREENSBORO , NC 27420
Facility Location
HUGH T. HICKS
WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
4820 US 29 NORTH
GREENSBORO , NC 27420
No revision required.
❑ Revision required. (Please specify below.)
0' No revision required.
® Revision required. (Please specify below.)
NoWARD T. STFFD
WYSONG & MTLES CO..
NORTH
GRERNSBORO.N.C.i .:
Please return this page with your letter requesting renewal, and $400 fee (payable to NCDEHNR) to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality/WQ Section
NPDES Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535/,�, /JOc�L+- AsSignature of applicant or authorized representatives "`r'6
Date _tI-0r-96

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
tiCGS/r)zZ-S
PERMIT NO.:-NC%27553-
PERNIITTEE NAME: Wysong & Miles Company
FACILITY NAME: W'✓Lg & Miles Company
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major
Minor
Pipe No.: 0(}i 003
Design Capacity: 0.0504 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
1
100 %
Proposed outfall relocation, see attached quad sheets.
'F,6:sr A r Muw c.caarA, J FLct mor11ToE4mci SUCH rl*ar
Vo"MC-S or rnLRSTENI't'rE2 LEAV1,46f ilia LINTY AKe MrrtrTDQED .
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Reedy Fork Creek
Class: C-NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-06-02
Reference USGS Quad: C 20 NW (please attach)
County: Guilford
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 10/31/95 Treatment Plant Class: 1
Classification changes within three miles:
No chanee
Requested by: Charles M. Lowe Date: 10/1/91
Prepared by:Date: Z
Reviewed by: &L Date: G
--
Modeler
JDateRec.
#
ERG
I (0124c,(
Drainage Area (mil ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): C.
7Q10 (cfs) Q, Q Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 4. C 30Q2 (cfs) D, 0-75—
Toxicity Limits: IWC 20 % Acu hroni
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters n/�A
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
c
ran n
BOD5 (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
q
�jl dt�k�6roe11w,L
3- C
Or p,v�iLs
-,yF'
F/ou) 'm61 -Jlulr i
rfrtiPG li�2VK2u fA
l4�' �O�UVn$0
4�__
luct k. wad
tuvi�kll
44,4 �ccci
5! xx�( lv
Comments:
52L Iibt"

Ile uaa/E)i f (V! -
��
010,
i�
�.-. �- - �---ITT. -�. \ �•' �� -: )S9/ �� �� � l �\
/ ' � ♦ \ FF \l J
_/%�✓/ �° 'c-�� �\J � " _ /���J��J _��✓ _ \ JJI / � Off`/ ` \
�� �',x � n L \ �� ,' . \ � �/�j'/ / � \ _ __�'' Sri � o � •\ ��
dr ,
\O•u\d- / '. 4. 'ii��-.• �J O ,.� .:r.r:: \ � �' �.s �47�= 9 7 ��� �/ �/ - - u : ' �•� �" :�
0

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Wysong and Miles Company
NCO027553
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Modification (Relocation)
UT to Reedy Fork Creek
C-NSW
030602
Guilford
Winston-Salem
Lowe
10/1/91
C20NW
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Request # 6475
Stream Characteristic:
estimated from
USGS #
02.0943.1250
Date:
1987
Drainage Area (mi2)
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.0
Average Flow (cfs):
0.5
30Q2 (cfs):
0.075
IWC (%):
100
A similar wasteload was completed by Johnson in 1990 for an alternative discharge site.
Recommendations are basically the same as the previous NPDES permit with one exception. The
toxicity test pass/fail limit will be 90% not 99% per new SOP. However, since data are limited,
monitoring for organics should still be required (see page two for a partial list).
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:Date: _7�Z
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: L-'"" "'^' �a^d Date: a Q
Regional Supervisor: Q • C U, Date: 2 2 5/-
Permits& Engineering: Date: L 4 1 Z-
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAR 0 5 1"2

i)
TWUCS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic, pass -fail using ceriodaphnia
Existing Limit: 99%
Recommended Limit: 90%
Monitoring Schedule: Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct
ExistingLimits
imits
pH (SU):
Wasteflow (MGD):
1,1 dichloroethene (µg/l):
Organics
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Recommended Limits
pH (SU):
Wasteflow (MGD):
1,1 dichloroethene (µg/l):
Organics
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Min./Max.
6-9
0.0504
23.0
* *
30.0 60.0
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Min./Max. WQ/EL
6-9 WQ
0.0504
23.0
* *
30.0 60.0
WQ
*Monitoring for organics should include (but not be limited to) the quantification of those
parameters listed below.
(See page three for special monitoring requirements.)
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
More recent effluent data
New regulations/standards/procedures x Toxicity test
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
*List of Organics to be Quantified as Part of NPDES Permit #NC0027553
NOTE: Wysong & Miles should monitor and quantify the following parameters at a minimum,
using EPA Method 601 and 602.
1,1,1
Trichloroethane
1,1
Dichloroethane
1,1
Dichloroethee
Benzene
Trichlorofluoroethane
1,1,2
Trichloroethane
1,2 Dichloroethane
Toluene
Xylene
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethane

43
02
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes_ No V— `They ka" nv+ye- c�iSehaxu�e& 4oSwvsa�e w44ws.
If no, which parameters cannot be met? u n i�n w-r Z S�Lo Jt - vxnp+ -1-"
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Organics (including but not limited to those listed on page 2) should be monitored using EPA -
method 601 and 602 to a detection level of 1 ppb. Permit must contain flow monitoring
requirement such that all volumes of wastewater leaving the facility are monitored. Recommend
continuous flow monitoring. Recommend quarterly monitoring for those chemical parameters to
be monitored This monitoring should coincide with all whole -effluent toxicity monitoring.
A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow for additional limits on these or other toxicant
should the whole -effluent toxicity testing results indicate toxic effects.
Explain exact pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to
LeImA)
Additional Information attached? 0 (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name W'/Sotj� � MICIc—S Co • Permit # o?75S__3 Pipe # cos
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
Thee uent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 10 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed aft r thirMt days m the effective date of this permit during the months of
_7e—s-i, % . / u/ 4C:74 . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluenf discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 0• d cfs
PermittedFlow o . o o MGD
IWC /°O %
Basin & Sub -basin CPG 63o6Dz
Receiving Stream LG`Tfo (�ee4 4;tl < C-zek
County Casa
Recommended by:
Date 7i1 7�
QCL PIF Version 9191

' '12/19/91 10:13 V919 375 6187
W WSOAV&
WSONG
i
WYSONG&MR-ES COMPANY NG274"6.7168
(41 62W960 P FAX [phone]E'A6eOR0.
Date_
Fax No_•
Ta •
Franz: 5��as u-tiCCC
HYSON6 & HiV COMPANY ,
Fax: [phone]
(If you have problem receiving our fax, call 919 6al-3960)
c-5,'GZ-
w,0-
I
U 001

1 . 1
6187
an environmental testing company —
p o.'Box 12M
pg5ep,e11 T6Llgla Bark. Norm Ce1r�11-117( 9
{9191 67700M
FAX 7 617-0/2T 1 '
October 30, 3991
Steve Ger=ltzea
Delta Euvisonmenta7- Consnitaatsr
6701 Ca=Qj Load, sni-te 211
Charlotte, Nc 28226 i
- i
ILA Prop NO.z 554322� _ 1
Sn,8 ;geference No.:, g9110160
CUent project I.D.: 50-88-173
i'
near tsr. Gezritseli, .. -- -- •• � .-
Transmitted herew%th are the results oP haalYses OIL one salap3.e submitted
to our laboratory.' -
Please see the enclosed reports for yeses results. ;
1
i
.� vezy truly yours, _
3M5, 3'sc. !
Linda P. 1Sitahsl3.`
Director, Technical support services
state CartLeLzatioa:
Alabama' - t40210
Georgia _ #816
New Jersey - 167719
ueaeu.-. u-v..ew
Cem�twt A°"d'
20S2IIiilSi ]OSWi�a
Teaaesaee - 100296 South Casblina - #99021
100179 - North carol3na - #B4 20
i
• i
ta.mlwrp. x9a.m. � ` 7(�ttR
sa157 ! w2ars5r.�
oall�s-vra QfTa26212 -

• '12/1
:15 V919 375
- _,
'•'•I88•Sample Number: -
C7.ient Name:
Client Project ID:
.�. Sample Identification:
Matrix:
puRv-ABLE '�SAC�BCxS _
SW-846 HETF.Dn 8010 CO:S" 0=S '
554-322 Data Receivedz H/A
Delta Bavironmental Date Sampledz N/A
50-8$-173 Date Analyzed:
QC Blank Analysis By: Ave
Water Danti.oa Factor: 1
'
Quaatitation
Results;
TAM!
Concentration
.. Number
O==und
' 1
B. omoc ; chloromethane
1-0
BYo=oform
1-0
BRL •I
- 3
8romomethaae
1-0
` 4
Carbon tetrachloride
1-0 ..._
BQL
• - -. 5
Chlorobeamene ..
1.0
_ BQL
Chlorcethane
1.0
.. _. BQL .i^,._•';''•-" - ._
'" 84% ' -
7
2-lcroethylvinyl ether
Ch
- 1-0
:f •' .
. - 8
•
Chlcrofosm
8QL -
...
•_ ...• 9
Chloromethane -
1.0 ..
.. ;.
..
,••
10
D3brcmochloromethane ..
1.0
BQL i..._
.:. 11
1,2-Dichloroi�enzene
1.0
..
LBlaL
12
1,3-Dichlorob'enz�aa
3-0'
-
i '. 13
1,4-Diclilorobenzene
1.0
BOL '
14
1,1-DSchloroetbane
- 1.0
BQL {
15
1,2-Dichloroetb`me
1.0
BQL
16
I,1-Dichlorcehhene
1.0
DM
17
trans-1,2-DichlczoeY nP
1.0
BQL j
18
1•,2-DiCh10r0_^^; asG
1.0
BQL i
19
cis-1,3Dichloropropene
1-0
BQL i
20
trans-1,3-DichlorograpenC
1.0
BQL
21
Methylene otaoride
1.0
EM
22
1,1,2,2-Tetraobloroethane
1.0
54L
-• BQL
' 23
Tetrachlorcethene
1.0
i
BM
24
1,1,i-Tri.chloroethane
1.0
i
BQL
25
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.0
. _� 26
TrichloroethhPTP
1-0
ML I
BQL
j 27
Trichlorofluordmethane
1.0
-
SOL
28
vinyl Chloride
1.0
1
i
Commentsz -
• Sample apecifi.0 quantitatimn limits may
be calculated by
multiplying
pantitation Limit by the dilution factor.
1 BQL - Below Quantitation Limit
_
N/?. - Not Applicable
CorYe62onding Samples: 554-322-1
_
FORH 8010
REV. 101091
i

'12/19/91 10:14 ,_'$919 375 6187
`: 401
IEe Sample Number:
Client Name:
,.m i a„r Project ID.
Sample Identification:
Matrix:
Number compound
_ _ ..Y Y:.. : � • .. r. 1 tlP
554-322-1
Delta Environmental
50-88-173
Effluent
Water
Date Received=
10/15/91
Date Sampled:
0/14/91
Data analyzed:
10/18/91
analysis BY:
8veri1l
Dilution Factor:
1
gaantitatioa
Limit
(u5/L)
1
E=cmodicbloromethane
. 1.0
2
Eromoform
1.0
3
BrOmamzTthaoe
1"0
4
Carbon tetrachloride
1.0
5
chlorobenzene
1.0
6
Chlorcethane
1.0
7
2-Chloroeth3?l4iayi ether
1.0
8
chloroform .
1.0
9
chiorometbano
1.0
10
Dibromochlompmethane
1.0
11
1,2-Dichloroben7eae
1.0
12
1,3-Dichlorobenzeae
1.0
13
1,4-Di^-7-11 0r0benzene
1.0
14
1,1Dicvioreethaae
1.0
is
1,2-Wi hloroetSana
1.0
16
1,SrDirhtoroethene
1.0
17
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.0
18
1,2Dichloronropana
1.0
Z
Resolts
concentration
Cn4/L( i
i
8¢L
SQL . _
8QL._ i
SQL,•
B4L
84L !.
BQL .,
BRL 1 .
BQL _..
EQL
BQL
EQL '
SQL {
BQL
BQL 3
BQL
BEL
79
cis-i,3-Dichlor0pr0pene
1.0
EQL
1
20
trans-1.3 Dichloroprapene
1.0.
EQL
1
21
Methylene chloride
1.0
E5?F
22
1,1,2,2 Tetrachlor0ethane
1.0
EQL
23
Tetrachloroethene
1.0
84�
24
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.0
6
25
1, 1, 2-Tricbl0roethane
1.0
EQF.
i
26
Trichloroethene
1.0
E�
27
Trichlorofluoromet*a^e
1.0
EQ
28
Vinyl Chloride
2.0
EQL
Comments
_
Sample specific quaatitatioa 13mit5 may be eaicnlated.by maltiplyInl
the gaantitatioa limit by the dilution factor.
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
"
FORM 8010
REV. 101091 _

375
7M TZBQRATOxY IMSULTS

20�o p

a
earl �am�rv� ��hFilS'

--bj!4. I
5�40-0--11099
:up 5-p : vlj
sy:- O'0 z ollpLM
5P) 0•0:01&5,
(L 80 0y21 !y. 6:3 2 p
aL�N fi0600 = "J
w I �qr oOm
N
I bl-2 - ; -/a/
ti
.o
d
a yae
4,
u� )1'W
5-Apvfl
AM'AV S�'11k GNb WgasM

r •r �.•
cc: Permits and Engineering (NPDES `l
Technical Support.t
Guilford County Emergency Management OCT 2 9! 91
Central Files
WSRO - GW TECHN!` BVI CH
WSRO - WQ
Date:e4r 9AI
Page: 1 of 4
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County Guilford
NPDES Permit No. NCO027553
PART I- GENERAL INFORMATION(New Discharge Point for GW
Remediation with relocation of discharge point)
1. Facility and Address:
Wysong & Miles Company located off US 29N Greensboro,
N.C. Mailing Address: Mr L. C. Lackey, President,
Wysong & Miles Company, P. O. Box 21168, Greensboro, NC
27420-1168
2. Dates of Investigation: 3/12/90, 3/13/90 (Site),
4/4/91(Site), and 10/15/91(Site)
3. Report Prepared by: Arthur R. Hagstrom, Environmental
Engineer, DEM, WSRO, WQ
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: L. C.(Sonny)
Lackey, President-Wysong&Miles,(919)-623-3960; Gary
Winiewski, and Rick Workentine, both consultants with
Delta Environmental,(704)-541-9890
5. Directions to Site:
Exit US 29 North at the Bryan Park, N.C. School for the
Deaf, and Eckerson Road exit. Turn right (south) on
Eckerson Road (SR 2970) and travel south approximately
.5 mile to the plant site located on the right on top of
hill. The discharge point is south of the plant
entrance road on the right(west) side of Eckerson Road.
6. Discharge Point - Latitude: 36deg9min58sec
Longitude:79deg42min46sec
Elevataion: 725 +/-
Discharge 001 was sanitary, 002 was for original GW
point. The new point could be either 002 or 003.
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicated treatment plant
site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No. C20NW or USGS Quad Name Browns Summit
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
Site is over 40 acres. No expansion of the facility is
expected once installed.

Page 2 of 4
NC0027553
October 21, 1991
S. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Graded to suit manufacturing plant. Slopes vary from 1
to 10%. The ground water remediation site is above the
flood plain. The discharge will be on the west side of
Eckerson Road just south of the Company's property.
9. Location of nearest dwelling:
Over 1000 feet from the WWTP.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Per the
remediation plan, the discharge was to be made into an
on site lake. DEM wanted it in the stream
below the lake. Because of installation problems, the
owner has asked that a new point be allowed that is
near the former sanitary discharge. All three possible
receiving UT segments flow into Reedy Fork at the same
point. Flow from the new discharge point enters a UT
that flows between the west side Eckerson Road below a
small lake.
a. Classification: Class "C" NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Cape Fear 030602
C. Describe. receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: The stream flows under Eckerson
Road via a 36" diameter.culvert and into another UT
to Reedy Fork(appr.1001), then to Reedy Fork which
flows through generally rural areas until it joins
the Haw River,(a WS-III NSW stream.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 0% Domestic
100% Industrial(Remediated
Groundwater)
a. Volume of Wastewater: 50,400 GPD
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
Low level residuals from GW remediation that were
not removed.
c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
See Delta Report accompanying original application
application in Central Files.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development approved
should be required not needed

Page 3 0£ 4
NC0027553
October 21, 1991
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in
pounds: N/A
a. highest month in the last 12 months
b. highest year in last 5 years
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only)
and applicable CPR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or
existing): Existing.
The remediation system was set up with float controlled
GW pumps, surge tank (120 gallon), transfer pump, an
Air Stripping tower, a blower, flow meters, and a
discharge line to the receiving stream.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme:
Drummed and contract disposal.
6. Treatment plant classification: Class "I"
7. SIC Code(s): 3542
Wastewater Code(s): 66
Main Treatment Unit Code: 550X0
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction
Grants Funds (municipals only)? No.
2. Special monitoring requests: None.
3. Effluent limits requests: Sufficient sampling should
be done to assure surface water quality.
4. Other: Currently, the existing remediation system
discharges into the Greensboro City sewer system. The
owner wants to discharge into surface water,and found
the original point unworkable, and therefore asked to
move the discharge point now indicated in the current
Permit to a different branch of the UT. The change in
discharge point should not affect Reedy Fork as all of
the discharge options flow into Reedy Fork at the same
point. The owner has obtained an easement to the new
proposed discharge point.

Page 4 of 4
NC0027553
October 21, 1991
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This application requests that the Permit be changed to
allow a new discharge point for the remediated groundwater.
This Office recommends the change and the re -issuance of the
Permit in accordance with current DEM policies.
ALam. � �5+�
Signature of repor reparer
Water Quality ervisor

C,Uo Jv)
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Winston-Salem Regional Office
July 9, 1990
M E M O R A N D U M
Date Overcash, Supervisor ,
NPDES Permitting Group, WQ V/
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
M. Steven Mauney, Supervisor
Water Quality, WSRO
Arthur R. Hagstrom
Environmental Engineer, WQ, WSRO
SUBJECT: Wyson and Miles Company's letter of
June 12, 1990, regarding the elimination
of their sanitary discharge by placing it
into a City sewer, NPDES Permit No.
NC0027553, Discharge 001, Guilford County
The subject letter was sent to your attention per our
request so that the monitoring and reporting for this
facility's domestic WWTP can be discontinued.
A new or modified permit for extensive groundwater
remediation at this site's Discharge 002 is in process by
your staff. A new issue of NCO027553 should not include the
domestic discharge. If a new permit is being issued for the
remediation operations, then the domestic permit should be
voided.
The new domestic sewer connection for this Company was
inspected and verified by Arthur R. Hagstrom with this
office on June 20, 1990. The domestic treated surface water
discharge from this site has ceased and the Permit should be
modified or voided and monitoring requirement ceased.
MSM/ARH/vm
cc: Enforcement Compliance
Central Files
WSRO
T.EcN;y/ 7
RFrOVED
JUL 1 11990
TCt iNKAL SUPPORT BRANCH

•�� S2pg2AN
ORTHILEP,O. OX 2 168 . GREENSaORO. NC 3960 FAX. [phone].1168
June 12, 1990 N.C. De�D
JUL 02 +9gp
North Carolina Department. of;;Environmental Health &Natural ResourcesV'OSfOn-$al8fn
PO-46,ox' 27667 Regionalbffic�
Ralei"gh;' NC 27611
Attention: Mr. Daie Overcash
Supervisor 'of NPDES Permits
Dear Mr.,overcash:
PI
a1-1tysee,;copy attached of our letter dated 'June 4, 1990 regarding ,water.
qual�tY mo►1toring We received' a
Of N C Department,of Environmental: Hea7thn& NaturalrResoiur. rcesrrequest�ngy
that hysongr&xMrl.es Company -advise ;by letter to'
da r- "herein, '.that
;we no'aonger need ;permit: for treated domestic "waste
water dischar." Your attention,:. and we
ge since we have ,recently connected",to,Greensboro,.City. Sewage
System and that we' wi11 continue to need permit for
remedi atiaon
ground water:
Yours
ery.,truly,:::.
WYSON6 b MILES`"COMP
L: C.+LacKey
President;-
cc: M Art 'Hagstrom.
C :Department of Environment, Health V
Natural Resources
- p0- Box 27687
Raleigh; NC 27611
I�

WYSCNG & MILES COMPANY
U.S. 29 NORTH • P.O. BOX 21168 • GREENSBORO. INC 27420.1168
[phone] FAX: [phone]
June 4; 1990 "
N. C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Attention: V. E. Venrick, Chief
Re; Water Quality Monitoring
Non -Transient, Non -Community
Public Water Systems
Gentlemen:
We are in 'receipt of: your letter dated June 1, 1990, in which you advise
"if you do' not- own or control the source of water
our off9ce� n writ otherwise
qualify" aS'-stated in your -letter, we should notify y
Wysong & Miles''Company does not qualify regarding water quality monitoring
non hooked
public water' systems. Wysong & Miles Company
has recently hodked up tq,the-Greensboro_City water and sewer system -
Yours very°'truly,
WYSONG & MILES COMPANY,
L. C. Lackey,
President
LCL:jb'

tie a SW / zs­`
DRk.�
PERMIT NO.:
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
FACILITY NAME: _ 4 ono edn.Onwv
da.wes�•c frt;i'fy (4.owtdWoiar Rene;)r`wf;ate {«a`I�*�
Facility Statue ( _
(circle one)
Permit Status: RENMA. Ia00FlfJ1710N UNINW171FD NEW
(circle one)
Major Moor� �I
Pipe No: 00;2- _ 67re..0elul04r- Qfvr2ti ai�`D.t bafiwl/
Design Capacity (MGD): 0' 06&{
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): /00
Comments: Class
rrev'o s f�1'1)i'j �er rn.`f �JC�i�'a�'.•an 4(M�-!�/sl�Q �. Iraw�¢y<r, 7ne
e i«(e.d 1-." tsstie AJ Lo
RECEIVING STREAM: �) r�2adv
Class: C -uSu)
Sub -Basin: 0 3 -Ob -D 2
Reference USGS /Q''uad:`` C o20 A)A) (please attach)
County: (7--, 1111//
/ Or�
Regional Office: As Fa Me Ra We WI WS
(circle one)
Requested By: Date:
Prepared fly: _5:/ '��''` ` Date•. o?a' l�
Reviewed By: "Date:
Modelerte
Da Rec.
M
w,-(�
3 l - I I Cjo
SGl(a .�
Drainage Area (mi2 ) Avg. Streamf low (cfs): (2• S
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) C' 30Q2 (cfs) 0.61
Toxicity Limits: IWC % (circle one) Acute / hronle
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream — Location
Ouiw1.11 .-nos+ be be%00 dare+ on U- +b
-Reedy FwK creek (Vln disclorq� i--:, POV%Ct i
--- - RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS --------------`-
No. Avg. Daily Max. Min/Max Mon. Freq
Flow (mgd): 0.0504 '
1r1 Dichloroethene (ug/1): 23 QRTRLY
ph (su): 6-9 2/month
OiI.M Geese (^y/1): 30 60 .2/04
Toxicity Testing Req.: Chronic Ceriodaphnia QRTRLY
-------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------_------------
The modification is for a new outfall, 002.
The following products will be recovered: solvents
No other products are to be recovered without modification of this permit.
• All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be continuously
monitored. If a pump totalizer is used to monitor flow, then monthly Average
flow, or total volume/month, along with instantaneous flows at the time
of all sampling may be used in lieu of continuous flow monitoring.
Monitor quarterly using EPA method 601 and 602 for the following:
1,1,1 Trichloroethane, 1,1 Dichloroethane, l,l Dichloroethener Benzene,
Trichloroflouroethane, 1,1,2 Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichloroethane, Toluene,
Trichloroethene, Tetrachloroethane, and Methylene Chloride.
Also monitor for MTBE and Xylenes.
Monitoring and toxicity testing should be done at the
the same time. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow
for limits to be placed on toxicants should the facility's whole
effluent toxicity monitoring indicate toxic effects.
NOTE: THE DRAFT PERMIT SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE GROUNDWATER SECTION.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments:

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Comments
(7
30.6 :F
60. b
Sa Nfu
Type of Product Produced I Lbs/Day Produced I Effluent Guideline Reference

COMPANY
W 7 0A O �'9O 21- & MILES FAX: [phone] EENSBORO, NC 27420-1168
March 2, 1990
North Carolina Department of Environment, _ fr
Health and Natural Resources t
Division of Environmental Managementf.,`s
Permits and Engineering h+��� U 5 1yyU
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611 ENGINEERING
Attention: Mr. Don Safrit
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, NC
Delta No. 50-88-173
Dear Mr. Safrit:
Please find enclosed for your review three (3) copies of an NPDES
Permit Application package consisting of an engineering proposal
prepared by Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. for a ground water
remediation system and a completed Short Form C discharge permit
application for the system effluent (see Appendix B). A check for
$200.00 to cover processing and public notice fees is also enclosed.
As stated in the attached engineering proposal, the chemical analysis
of the treated ground water will remain constant over a 24 to 48
hour period due to a homogeneous nature of the ground water and the
uniform level of treatment applied. Grab samples will provide the
same analytical results as would 24 to 48 hour composite samples.
For this reason, it is requested that all samples be collected as
grab samples and that sampling be performed on a monthly basis for
all parameters.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at [phone].
Yours very truly,
WY 6 8 ES COMPANY
L. C. Lackey j
President /
LCL:jb
Enc.
cc: Mr. Harold N. Bynum
Smith, Helms, Mullis & Moore
PO Box 21927
Greensboro, NC 27420
cc: Mr. Gary Wisniewski
Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc.
7401 Carmel Executive Park, Suite 206
Charlotte, NC 28226

ENGINEERING PROPOSAL
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
WYSONG & MIIFS COMPANY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
DELTA NO. 50-88-173
FEBRUARY, 1990
1.0 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to present the design of a proposed ground water treatment system at the
Wysong & Miles Company (Wysong) facility located on Highway 29 north of Greensboro, North Carolina
(see Figures 1 and 2). The ground water at this site has been contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons.
An on -site ground water recovery and treatment system designed to remove the dissolved chlorinated
hydrocarbon contamination is proposed to remediate this site.
The design of the on -site remediation system specifies that the treated effluent is to be discharged to a
pond on the Wysong property located north of the Wysong facility (see Figure 3). This pond overflows
into an unnamed tributary of Reedy Fork Creek.
Two soil venting systems are currently in operation at Wysong to remediate the soil contaminated with
chlorinated hydrocarbons. Details concerning these systems were presented to the State in the Remedial
Action Work Plan (TCA Tank Area) and the Remedial Action Work Plan for the Former Disposal Basin
Area submitted in June 1988 and May 1989, respectively.
2.0 WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION
Ground water samples were collected from the site's two recovery wells during a pump test conducted in
November 1989. Samples were collected in November of 1988 from the Wysong supply well (WSW) which
will also be used as a recovery well in the remediation system. The analytical results from these sampling
events are summarized in Table 1. Based on these analyses and the estimated flow rate from each of the
three recovery wells, the design influent concentrations of the primary ground water contaminants were
calculated. These design influent concentrations are presented in Table 2, and a copy of the calculations
performed to estimate these concentrations is included in Appendix A.
Treatment system removal efficiencies greater than 99% for the chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminants are
used to estimate the effluent concentrations shown in Table 2. These are based upon the removal
efficiencies achieved by a pilot pretreatment system implemented during the pump test conducted at
Wysong in November 1989, as summarized in Table 3.

FM
• Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 2
In addition to the primary contaminants already discussed, several trace contaminants have been detected
at Wysong during sampling of monitoring wells and recovery wells. A summary of the maximum
concentrations as determined by laboratory analyses for these trace contaminants in either monitoring or
recovery well samples is presented in Table 4.
3.0 FLOW ORIGIN AND TYPE
The maximum expected discharge from the proposed treatment system is 50,400 gallons per day (35 gpm)
of ground water treated for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOC). The maximum ground
water flow rate was estimated using local and regional geologic data as discussed in the reports
Hydrogeologic and Contamination Assessment -Phase 11, Hydrogeologic and Contamination Assessment -
Phase II Supplemental Report, and Remedial Action Work Plan for Ground Water Remediation submitted
to the state in April 1989, August 1989, and January 1990, respectively.
pe The average expected discharge from the proposed treatment system is 20-25 gpm. The actual discharge
volume is expected to vary with time due to decreasing recovery well yields as the contaminated zone is
dewatered. An additional recovery well may also be added depending upon the effectiveness of the existing
recovery wells and the continued monitoring of the contaminant plume.
Unlike municipal or industrial wastewater flows which generally consist of slugs of different types of wastes
discharged throughout the course of the day, the pumped ground water will be consistent in its chemical
analysis. A grab sample of the effluent from the ground water treatment facility collected at any time of
day will be analytically similar to a composite sample collected over 24 to 48 hours. For this reason,
grab samples of the treated ground water are requested for all analytical testing.
Because of the anticipated consistency of the treatment system performance, Delta requests a sampling
Nfrequency of once/month for all parameters. Twice/month is not required for a system of this type.
114

Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 504&173
Page 3
4.0 GROUND WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
4.1 Overview of Available Technolotaes
4.1.1 Activated Carbon Adsorption
Activated carbon adsorption involves a physical separation process in which the organic constituents are
removed from a waste stream by sorption or the attraction and accumulation of the organics by the carbon.
As the activated carbon adsorbs the organics from the waste stream, the carbon eventually becomes
saturated and the exhausted carbon must be regenerated or replaced. Activated carbon treatment is a well -
developed and demonstrated technology, but requires high capital investment and is maintenance intensive.
Carbon adsorption is generally reserved as a polishing step.
4.1.2 Air Stripping/Steam Strippin¢
Air stripping removes volatile organics from liquid waste streams due to an affinity of volatile compounds
for the gas phase. Secondary treatment of the gas phase may be required depending on local air emission
requirements. The ability of a compound to be successfully stripped is indicated by its Henry's Constant,
which indicates a compound's preference for the gaseous to the aqueous phase. Air stripping is usually
implemented by using either an air stripping tower packed with a plastic media or aeration tanks
containing air diffusers.
Steam stripping involves the same concepts as air stripping but uses elevated temperatures during the
stripping process to increase the removal of the organic constituents present. Steam stripping and air
stripping are demonstrated technologies for remediation of ground water contaminated with chlorinated
hydrocarbons such as those present in the ground water at this site.
4.13 Filtration/Ultrafiltration
Filtration is a physical process of removing suspended solids by forcing a waste stream through a physically
restrictive medium. Filtration is primarily a pretreatment process to be used in conjunction with other
technologies in the treatment of contaminated ground water.
Ultrafiltration is a physical process of separating dissolved or suspended solids from a waste stream on the
basis of molecular size. High molecular weight solutes are separated from solution through the use of

Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 4
semipermeable polymeric membranes. Ultrafiltration is at present not a widely applied technology for the
treatment of contaminated ground water.
4.1.4 Biological Treatment
Biological treatment is suitable for remediation of most chlorinated hydrocarbons such as those detected
at this site, but research indicates that for such remediation to be successful it must be performed under
yanaerobic conditions. For the primary pollutant at this site, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA), research has
indicated that biological treatment of ground water is not successful under either aerobic or anoxic
conditions. The requirement of anaerobic conditions for biotreatment of such waste means that in situ
treatment may not be practicable and that above ground bioreactors would be necessary. Such treatment
systems generally require temperature regulation, a much higher capital investment, and more frequent
monitoring for successful operation than do physical -chemical treatment systems.
4.15 Ultraviolet/Ozone Oxidation
Ultraviolet/ozone oxidation involves the combined use of ultraviolet light and ozone to chemically oxidize
Mselected organic constituents. The combined use of ultraviolet and ozone provides an oxidation rate that
is many times faster than that obtained from applying ozone or ultraviolet light alone. One advantage of
the ultraviolet/ozone oxidation is that the organic compounds are totally destroyed rather than simply
transferred to another medium as in air stripping. At present, however, ultraviolet/ozone oxidation is not
a cost-effective remediation technology except in situations with very stringent air emission requirements.
5.0 GROUND WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
5.1 Selected Technoloev
The remedial technology proposed for implementation at this site is air stripping. The primary
contaminants identified in the ground water are 1,1,1-TCA and its degradation products, all of which have
a Henry's Constant, H, of sufficient magnitude to be removable by air stripping (see Table 5). When
compared to the other treatment options, air stripping is the most reliable, field -proven and cost-effective
alternative.
11

R
Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 5
The pump test conducted at Wysong provided the opportunity to test the performance of an air stripping
system in treating the contaminated ground water at this site. During the pump test, a temporary aeration
system composed of aeration tanks and centrifugal blowers was used to pretreat the ground water prior
to its discharge to the Greensboro city sewer system. Analyses of effluent samples from this aeration
system indicated that all contaminants had been removed to below analytical quantitation limits (BQL).
A summary of the pretreatment system's contaminant removal efficiencies during the pump test for RW-
1 is presented in Table 3.
An air stripping tower is proposed for treating the contaminated ground water from the recovery system.
The treatment system design flow is approximately 35 gallons per minute (gpm). Aeration tanks are
impractical for design flow greater than approximately 10 gpm, which was the maximum flow permitted
by the City of Greensboro for discharge to the sewer during the pump tests.
Based upon a design flow of 35 gpm and the estimated influent and effluent concentrations discussed in
the following section, an air stripping tower was designed that is 18 inches in diameter and 34 feet high.
It will be equipped with a 1/3 hp blower to provide a 235 cfm countercurrent of air, resulting in a design
air:water ratio of 50:1. The packing used will be Lanpac with a total packing depth of 29 feet. The air
stripping tower is preceded by a surge tank equipped with a transfer pump to provide flow equalization
to improve the efficiency of the tower. The tower is also followed by a surge tank and transfer pump to
ensure that the tower effluent is discharged at a sufficient rate to prevent the backup of water in the air
stripping tower.
Because the proposed air stripping will result in a discharge to the atmosphere, a letter will be sent to the
Air Quality Section of the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management informing them of the
estimated air emissions resulting from the proposed treatment system. Any air discharge permits required
by the Air Quality Section in response to this letter will be obtained prior to initiating operation of the
proposed treatment system. A copy of the calculations estimating the treatment system's air emissions is
included in Appendix B.

_ Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 6
52 Estimated Influent and Effluent Parameters
The estimated influent and effluent concentrations for the ground water treatment system are presented
in Table 2. The estimated influent values are derived from calculations based on the laboratory analyses
of ground water samples collected from RW-1, RW-2 and WSW. A copy of these calculations is included
in Appendix A. The target effluent concentrations represent the current available federal drinking water
standards or recommended maximum contaminant levels (RMCL) for the indicated compounds.
The design of the air stripping tower is based on the indicated influent and effluent concentrations and
a maximum design flow of 35 gpm. This provides a very conservative design criterion because the air
stripping tower is thereby designed to produce an effluent of drinking water quality with respect to the
contaminants of concern at the maximum expected hydraulic yield from the three recovery wells.
53 Treatment System Location
A schematic indicating the proposed location of the ground water recovery and treatment system in
relation to the facility is shown in Figure 3.
5.4 Equipment and Materials
A list of the equipment proposed for the ground water recovery and treatment system is presented in Table
6. A process flow diagram illustrating the sequential arrangement of the equipment in the treatment
system is shown in Figure 4, and a schematic of the proposed general arrangement of the treatment system
is presented in Figure 5. It should be noted that the final specifications for remediation system equipment
are subject to minor modifications as the design is reviewed and revised prior to equipment ordering and
installation.
5.5 System Maintenance and Safety
Maintenance of the ground water recovery and treatment system will be conducted by Wysong personnel
with assistance and oversight from Delta. A maintenance log will be kept and updated regularly to ensure
efficient system operation. The system includes several control devices to protect the equipment in case
of any malfunctions. These devices include:

Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 7
1) a cutoff switch that turns off the ground water pumps in case of high water in the surge tanks
preceding and following the air stripping tower, thereby preventing overflow of the surge tanks;
2) a float switch in the air stripping tower that turns the entire system off in case of high water in
the base of the air stripping tower, thereby preventing water from entering and short-circuiting the
A air stripping tower blower; and
3) a sail switch in the air stripping tower that turns the ground water pumps off in case the air
stripping tower blower fails to operate and provide the air flow needed for adequate treatment.
-J
The proposed ground water treatment system will be located on Wysong property next to their
manufacturing facility. This property is under surveillance, and the system will be located at least 100 feet
from any area of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. All wiring at the site will be completed according to the
applicable electrical code.
6.0 SOLIDS OR FUEL DISPOSAL
No solids will he generated from the treatment process.
7.0 PLANS TO REDUCE THE DISCHARGE OF WASTE AND POLLUTANTS
As required under North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(g), plans to reduce the discharge of waste
and pollutants by "source reduction or recycling" were considered in the design of this ground water
remediation system. No solid waste or sludge is generated by this system, and no technique for further
reducing the waste source or recycling the effluent of the treatment system has been identified. Therefore,
no additional means of reducing or 'recycling the waste discharged by this system were found to be
-J applicable to this treatment process.
&0 SYSTEM MONITORING
&1 Monitoring of Ground Water Recovery and Treatment System
The ground water remediation system will be monitored by Wysong personnel daily during working hours
to verify that the system is operating properly. The treatment system influent and effluent will be sampled
monthly for one year and quarterly thereafter. Effluent samples will be monitored for volatile organic
parameters using EPA Method 601 by an independent, certified laboratory. A totalizing flow meter will
be installed on each of the recovery wells to document the total volume of ground water being pumped
Iand treated.

Engineering Report
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Page 8
82 System Performance Evaluation
Delta maintains an internally developed data base system to monitor the successful performance of all
systems installed by Delta. Included in this data base is a complete listing of all equipment at the site
as well as a complete record of all sampling events and results. Using this data base, including the influent
and effluent sampling results for the ground water treatment system, the performance efficiency of the
treatment system will be evaluated and charted throughout the duration of its operation. The results of
this evaluation will be included in the system performance reports prepared by Delta for this site. If this
evaluation indicates that the system is not operating at its expected design efficiency, improvements and/or
modifications to the system will be implemented promptly to bring the system performance up to
acceptable treatment efficiencies.
9.0 PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT
See Appendix C.
10.0 NPDES APPLICATION
See Appendix D.
This report was prepared by:
DELTA ENviRoNMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
A�M, a,
Paul I{. Muller, M.S. l
Project Environmental Engineer
This report was reviewed by:
Gary M. W' nlewski, P.E.
M na Project ger
NCPE Registration No. 15499
/lms
Date
c2 d FA D
Date
—
CA.
�diESS p is '
or •, �l�_
15499 °
!1'G F4.^5:

TABU 1
Primary Ground Water Contaminant Concentrations in Recovery Wells
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-M173
I. Analytical results from Pump Test Samples, November 1989
Contaminant RW-1 (10 eom) RW-2 (1 nm)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 53.000 mg/l 290.000 mg/l
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.400 mg4 0.680 mg/I
ill-Dichloroethene 8.900 mg/l 23.000 mg/l
Note: Flow rate for RW-1 was 10 gallons per minute (gpm); flow rate for RW-2 was 1 gpm.
All concentrations in units of mg/l.
II. Analytical results from Wysong supply well sample, November 1988
Contaminant Concentration (m 41
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6.10
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.93
1,1-Dichloroethene 5.00
Note: Estimated well yield for the Wysong supply well is 10-20 gpm.

TABLE 2
Design Treatment Efficiencies of Proposed Ground Water Treatment
1 System for the Three Primary Contaminants
Wysong & Mils Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-8&173
10
94
Estimated
Influent
Contaminant
Concentration
10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
41.90
1,1-Dichloroethene
7.70
IN 1,1-Dichloroethane
2.10
All concentrations in units of mg/1.
Estimated
Design
Effluent
Removal
Concentration
Efficiency
0.200
99.52%
0.007
99.91%
0.005
99.76%

TABLE 3
Pretreatment System Removal Efficiencies Based on
Pump Test Sample Results for RW-1
Wysong & Mils Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-88-173
Influent
Contaminant
Concentrations
1,1,1 -Trichl oroethane
53.000
1,1-Dichloroethane
3.400
1,1-Dichloroethene
8.900
Trichlorofluoromethane
0.460
Effluent
Removal
Concentrations
Efficiency
0 �,
BQL (<0.005)
>99.99%
C 'a�
—`'to c (h
BQL (<0.005)
>99.85%
BQL (<0.005)
>99.94%
3, a
BQL (<0.005)
>98.91%
0
All concentrations in units of mg/1.
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit; Quantitation Limit = 0.005 mg/1
Pump test flow rate = 10 gpm

TABLE 4
Summary of Trace Ground Water Contaminants and Maidmum Concentrations
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 50-M173
Contaminant
1,1,2-Trichl oroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorotluoromethane
Tetrachloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Concentration (mM)
�2
0.110
0.890
9
8U. %
�a• 1
0.160
////
770
0.460
'r
0.056
0.005
/S7 F
0.310
0.370
0.060
Di
0.014

TABLE 5
Henry's Constants of Detected Contaminants
Wysong & Miles Company
Greensboro, North Carolina
Delta No. 5043&173
Contaminant
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
111,2-Trichloroeth ane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Trichioroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Tetrachloroethane
Benzene
Toluene
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
Xylenes (average)
Henrv's Constant
3.6 E-03
7.8 E-04
5.1 E-03
1.1 E-03
1.7 E-01
1.0 E-01
1.1 E-01
4.2 E-04
4.6 E-03
5.7 E-03
2.5 E-03
4.0 E-04•
4.9 E-03
'Estimated; none reported yet in the literature.
Note: All Henry's Constants values in units of atm • m'/mole.

ui
GLT yi. FHe� arl e Q 3 -61;, - O .-.2
JN f� t� idnl o r oa�r6.a r 2 3 `I �,Q L rJ
go it
I-,
►.1vs�.c
nn 7o(urne .aoB •� �� i i1 k4!!
rv! X,.IQxQ ,.14 .14 — —
°" 737
aew , r- Q 99 V. 17% r&mj

S
e
T 33
,
T
y�:
"
ryp
Y3
yK i S•,"4 �4i..
1
V ti
1,
3.`
•�
""
..
,
", i�
� fir,
x
-
WRA
�-
7pl;.:
=
IM
1

Facility
NPDES
Req. #: 5616
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM -------------------
Name: Wysong & Miles Co.
No.: NCO027553
Type of Waste: Industrial/Groundwater
Status: Existing/Modification
Receiving Stream: UT to Reedy Fork Creek
Classification: C-NSW
remediation d o a
7
Subbasin:
30602
Drainage
area:
0.600
sq mi
County:
Guilford
Summer
7Q10:
0.00
cfs
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Winter
7Q10:
0.00
cfs
Requestor:
Lula Harris
Average
flow:
0.50
cfs
Date of Request:
3/6/90
30Q2:
0.08
cfs
Ouad:
C20NW
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS --------------------------
Mo. Avg. Daily Max. Min/Max Mon. Freq
Flow (mgd): 0.0504
1,1 Dichloroethene (ug/1): 23
ph (su) :
QRTRLY
6-9 2/month
cTk
Toxicity Testing Req.: Chronic Ceriodaphnia QRTPL �� E D
-------------------------- COMMENTS ------------------ I 7 r-• ---------------
The modification is for a new outfall, 002. 10
The following products will be recovered: solvents
No other products are to be recovered without modikT;V9f16Yi"Vf111this permit.
* All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be continuously
monitored. If a pump totalizer is used to monitor flow, then monthly Average
flow, or total volume/month, along with instantaneous flows at the time
of all sampling may be used in lieu of continuous flow monitoring.
Monitor quarterly using EPA method 601 and 602 for the following:
1,1,1 Trichloroethane, 1,1 Dichloroethane, 1,1 Dichloroethene, Benzene,
Trichloroflouroethane, 1,1,2 Trichloroethane, 1,2 Dichloroethane, Toluene,
Trichloroethene, Tetrachloroethane, and Methylene Chloride.
Also monitor for MTBE and Xylenes.
Monitoring and toxicity testing should be done at the
the same time. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow
for limits to be placed on toxicants should the facility's whole
effluent toxicity monitoring indicate toxic effects.
NOTE: THE DRAFT PERMIT SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE GROUNDWATER SECTION.
-,� P� e�a4, W40 Ti
wv4s -Nu 4KAtVa to rPrepared
tKI O_„ea(�b�r, e5 Betsy Johnson
creellievi�Y,g�a by
-R; s WLA (law so
KZ+ed
1V%*0 "e.:,'
'ns PevIA
ha.VtK�
vb �ino �h eo"+ «
by:
-
Date:
+ki-d;ScluVe Instream Assessment:
W\7 Regional Supervisor:
1400 Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNIC
( 'QALw JL,�� Date:
Date:
Date:
AL SUPPORT BY: JUN 06 1990
,Zke, w!'fG0
�9J
S-S-S0
5� �

10A9
Facility Name ki% 'S- ; rY1,7e_s �'o. �Daf {( �n Permit # _ dYC/JCJa Z;Q -
CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY) `
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity in any two consecutive toxicity tests; jj: '
K using test procedures outlined in:
1
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is _2�2_010 (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish
compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from
issuance of this permit during the ntonths of JA•N APR.JUL nc-r . Effluent
sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES peennttted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes. -
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7QIOPenn � cfs
Petmited low . osoy MGD Recommended by:
1WC% 100
Basin & Sub -basin 0 s- o - o z
Receiving Stream uT A.'-k eeA' ViWY,C,�k�--
County Gk.1-VorA Date t///j / 90
**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 31%,J&� A?PiJUL, OCT, See Part 3 , Condition _G--.

A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
November 15, 1990
Mr. L. C. Lackney
Wysong & Miles Company
PO Box 21168
Greensboro, NC 27420-1168
Dear Mr. Lackney:
OS-ob-eZ
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC27553
Wysong & Miles Company
Guilford County
ta- -Qltp:j %nLt awdbw-
The Division of Environmental Management is in receipt of information which confirms that
the subject facility no longer wishes to discharge treated domestic wastewater from outfall 001
to the surface waters of the State of North Carolina. Therefore, as you requested, NPDES Permit
No. NCO027553 is hereby issued to removed outfall 001 and to allow a discharge of
groundwater remediation from outfall 002.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Mack Wiggins at (919)
733-5083.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Compliance
Winston Salem Regional Office
Permit File
Budget Office
Technical Support Branch
Si cerelly�,.,eu
,
A.., —
e T
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

*CGS!0/zS
PERMIT NO.: 'N 00
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
FACILITY NAME:
T
Facility Status: PROP06ED
(circle one)
Permit Status: M?O-WAL TION UNPERmnTED NEW
(circle one)
MaJor Irino[�—
Pipe No:
Design Capacity (MGD): A
Domestic (X of Flow): IWO
Industrial (X of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:
Class: er �.ir I��✓.rG ll/.>�crS
Sub -Basin: t�s 00y
Reference USSGS Quad: �.�4 /Wg (please attach)
County: �-
Regional Office: As Fa Me Re We WI Ill`s
(Circle one)
Requested By GGt'`G All Date:
Prepared By: Date: 6�5--�-
Reviewed By:_f r��rNu� xJJ `tN1
Zak 7"
Z�2 B
Modeler
Date Rec.
*"
J-2-
Drainage Area (in?)Y
) 0.62' Avg. Streamflow (cfs): o•SU
7Q10 (cfs) 01y Winter 7Q10 (cfs) '' L 30Q2 (cfs) 108
Toxicity Limits: IWC X (circle one) Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
-km?
Lrr) 20;ccn1
col,;ar,ni con
Upstream
i
Location SO_=�
oG Ls""
�s�reaM
Downstream
Location L
mouill o� UT
(A
lRl
Effluent
Characteristics
SuMnur
WIA46r
BODE (mg/1)
3U
5
10
NHj N (mg/0
N R
z
y
D.O. (mg/0
6
6
6
TSS (mg/0
30
30
30
F. Col. (/100ml)
1000
1000
1006
PH (SU)
6-1
6
6-7
T M Si10N
co ) Z LfM
1 T Q
II
FcLrL
I 1990
Fe%rv.aLr 1 149U
t� 2—� se{ of
k Ott, 1L

I
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE-, GUIDELINE LIMITATIONSBELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Daily
Comments
Average
Maximum
7..
1z"\ V.
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference

Request No.: 5270
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FbRM
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
WYSONG & MILES COMPANY
NCO027553
DOMESTIC
EXISTING f+?Y-
UT TO REEDY =ReE4`
C-NSW
030602
Drainige
GUILFORD
Summer
WINSTON-SALEM
Winter
MACK WIGGINS
Average
5/10/89
C20NW
RECEIVED
MAY 3 0 1989
n'rr"f ED
h. _ iJ M
v 2 3 IN9
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
u_nnvG
area:
0.600 s mi
7Q10:
0.00 c
7010:
0.00 c s
flow:
0.50 cfs
3002:
0.09 cfs
-------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS -------------------------
(A) Summer Winter 'T5 6 9
Wastef low ( mgd) : 0.008 0.008 0.008 $ n
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 5 10 4A"'v�cpenSesdua�e
NH3N (mg/1): NR 2 4 Q` �`a`���}_{y_
DO (mg/1) : 6 6 6 �;� rlei;AIDPAeed QIiCs
TSS (mg/1).- 30 30 30 qhopmdkwtFn fl4niEd of inn c�14is
Fecal col iform ( #/100m1) : 1000 1000 1000 SoluC'rtt ynit 4o)re-&U A b0t&
pH ( su) : 6-9 6-9 6-9 n�AS��hlt ((���'0°ti b¢�er(
-th canhw�d(¢-tti,. Cast ei'
hoolCi n �c(� ae tke C'�iy Sawet
---------------------------- MONITORING----------------------�----------`
6w�n� s+,&0kA1f4 +%ey
Upstream (Y/N). Y Location: 50 FEET UPSTREAM OF DA!MHVGE <Y' jxAnkaut�Jl99o.
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location: AT MOUTH OF UT lA(Z)�-WS(e,
----------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------------
IN CONCURRENCE WITH THE WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE, RECOMMEND A FIVE(Aw.1 jkSa.j.)
YEAR PERMIT BE ISSUED WITH THE (A) LIMITS APPLICABLE FOR THE FIRST SIX 19903
MONTHS AND THE (B) LIMITS APPLYING FOR THE REMAINING 4'¢ YEARS. THE
i n (1 inlq
FACILITY IS ONLY 50 FEET AWAY FROM THE A SEWER HOOK- (SEE ATTACHED, CJ
REQUEST THE REGION TO ADD ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). teb.1,199 c
RECOMMEND INSTREAM MONITORING OF TEMPERATURE, DO, CONDUCTIVITY, AND
FECAL COLIFORM. THE DOWNSTREAM SAMPLING SITE HAS BEEN MOVED FURTHER
DOWNSTREAM TO PROVIDE A BETTER INDICATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE DISCHARGE.
---------------------------------------------�-------------------�-J---------
Recommended by: --- -sis- /�,-------- Date: - 5100-----
Reviewed by 4(/,��,,
Tech Support Supervisor: _ �ON(--------------- Date:
/ZZ
IAT� Regional Supervisor:
'qL0Permits & Engineering:
* Water Qual Section Chief:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL
Date: _.f=_ZX_ k S_
Date: _A0in__-_
Date: _Alyl-4y __

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 19, 1929
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wysong & Miles Company WLA File
FROM: Mike Scoville
SUBJECT: Explanation of NPDES Limit Recommendations
(NPDES No. NCO027553, Guilford County)
Wysong & Miles Company discharges to an unnamed tributary to Reedy Fork
Creek (C-NSW) at a location USGS estimates the 7Q10 to be zero and the 3002
to be 0.075 cfs. The facility has repeatedly indicated that they would like
to connect to the Greensboro city sewer and has implied that they are plan-
ning to do so, but no action has been taken to that effect to date. The
nearest available hook-up site is approximately 50 feet from the discharge.
Although no instream water quality problems have been documented by the
self -monitoring data, the downstream sampling site is only 200 feet down-
stream and not where the greatest impact would be expected.
For the last two years (1987 and 1988) it has been the understanding of
Technical Support that this facility was actively making plans to connect to
the sewer system and thereby cease discharge. Accordingly, two one-year
permits in a row were issued with expectations that subsequent permit
renewal would not be necessary. Both times it was recommended that if the
permit was renewed summer (winter) limits of BOD5=5 (10) mg/1, NH3-N=2 (4)
mg/l, and DO=6 (6) mg/1 be applied. Given these circumstances, it is the
recommendation of Technical Support, in concurrence with the Winston-Salem
Regional Office, that a 5 year permit be issued with the existing effluent
limits applicable for the first six months and the above, more stringent,
limits applicable for the remainder. The six month period will provide the
facility t6 time to investigate the alternatives and perhaps the more strin-
gent limits will provide incentive to finally connect to the sewer.

RECEIVED
M.C. Dept. NFICD
MAY 23 5339
Winston-Salem
Regional Office

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCOO -__7 S.S3
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: � PROPOSED
(circle one)
Permit Status:, W)OFICATION UrBEILMMED NEW
(circle oae)
Major Minor -
Pipe No:
Design Capacity (MGD):
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): _
Comments: �No�/ AOL.
Un.Ly� A�T�� w»�cit T+eV WtL-RG 't-Inok.� iiA1 TJ �,
RECEIVING STREAM:
Class:
Sub -Basin: f>5-o6-02
Reference USGS Quad: C-20 - Nu1 (please attach)
County:
Regional Office: As Fa Me Re Wa Wi WAS
(circle one)
Requested By:Date:
Prepared By:
Reviewed By:
Modeler
Date Re_
K '
SDV
g1i4�96
�g-3� '�
Drainage Area (mil) � , Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 2•54—
7Q10 (cfs) '
Winter
7Q10
(cfs) '
30Q2 (cfs) LEY
Toxicity Limits:
IWC
%
(circle one)
Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters Te,,40.ra�(4.e � bo Band=c•1; � %eat rehforAl
Upstream Location a• uRsfnan a1 d�ch... �.f
Downstream Location Zoo doWec{ren., .1
Frelue4Ly ; vveekly in the sumM+.r (()P : ocfolasr)
Nlon}hl./ ;n the w;✓��,er (Aleue�nller- Ma�cl7�
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BODE (mg/0
3d
NHj N (mg/1)
NR
D.O. (mg/I)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100m1)
1660
PH (SU)
6-9
-k&e ef`G CA
CA;mrecymnucY�u
r
f
.swA
�ac;l'�, o
eW r
II
(M,r
C Llt �Y lMIT
�S owgJ a M/l
r
and 30Q2 > o eF3.

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics Monthly DailyAverage Maximum Comments
Type of Product Produced I Lbs/Day Produced I Effluent Guideline Reference

sac• �� o\ ��+,�`'
n� R
Request
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
i lit y Name:
NP DE S No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
NCO027553
DOMESTIC
EXISTING
REEDY FORK GR99X
C-NSW
030602
GUILFORD
WINSTON-SALEM
DAVID FOSTER
9/12/88
C20NW
pmq ---
Epp ffllttff yy0
oERMI-IS & ENGINEERING
Drainage area: 0.600 sq mi
Summer 7010: 0.00 cfs
Winter 7010: 0.00 cfs
Average flow: 0.50 cfs
3002: 0.075 cfs
-------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS-------------
Wasteflow (mgd):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal coliform (#/100ml):
pH (su):
Toxicity Testing Req.:
Upstream (Y/N): Y
Downstream (Y/N): Y
.008
30
N6 �Wn wail be iQe z"R IYw� �ekmi�.
1000 wh/ nrl• �ssw- eAotin a Srean ekhTpi-� Oct �w
6-9 Y' w1ivvtAs � 514w "2 vow rat.*PUW lase
MONITORING fL 14-w`-)*}"A {
3 013 o. T, wj fi.wo..,ii l� � ✓� b dee...,.,,.i.�rh tC
Location: 50 FEET UPSTREAM OF DISCHARGE �`"�*P^•
Location: 200 FEET DOWNSTREAM OF DISCHARGE Yj4)*.Ac
--- COMMENTS------------------
10.0
THESE ARE EXISTING LIMITS.
RECOMMEND THE FACILITY TIE INTO THE GREENSBORO SEWER SYSTEM DURING THIS
ONE-YEAR PERMIT CYCLE. IF PERMIT IS RENEWED AGAIN, LIMITS WILL BE
BOD5=5 mg/1 AND NH3-N=2 mg/l, PER STANDARD DIVISIONAL PROCEDURE INVOLVING
DISCHARGES TO STREAMS WITH A POSITIVE 3002 AND A 7Q10=0.
RECOMMEND INSTREAM MONITORING OF TEMPERATURE, DO, FECAL COLIFORM, AND
CONDUCTIVITY. SAMPLING SHOULD BE WEEKLY IN THE SUMMER (APRIL-OCTOBER)
AND MONTHLY IN THE WINTER (NOVEMBER-MARCH).
----------------------------
Recommended by: --------- Date:
Reviewed by
�OCTech Support Supervisor: __ A ----- Date:
y�j Regional Supervisor:
Date:
Permits & Engineering: ------------ Date:
OCT 18 1988
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: ------ ______-------

RECEIVED
14.C. Dept. NRCD
SEP ZU 1988
uivis�on ut
Environmental Management
Winston-Salem Reg. Office

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCOO 2755
FACILITY NAME: WV5 t1i �
Facility Status: �[7CtS7�K' PROPOSED
(circle one)
Permit Status: Ftaq 1 MODIRCAMON
(circle one)
Minor Minor
Pipe No: O
Design Capacity (MGD): O, D o 8
Domestic (% of Flow): I co
Industrial (% of Flow): D
Comments:
abv
RECEIVING STREAM: dT__3? �ezcly �[Xk
Class: G usw
Sub -Basin: 0
Reference USGS Quad: C 2,42 J JW (please attach)
County: Gy-, (,~ tnd
Regional Office: As Fa Mo Ra)Wa W1 WS
teircle enel
Requested By: ° "�'—'� Date: q1167
�l 8
Prepared By: __(Yn bLI/nv Date:
Reviewed By: - '/Da (Z-te: 3�
Modeler
Date
SCV
44
z187
3g31
Drainage Area (mil) ( .b Avg. Streamflow (cfs):6,!�
7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) r_30Q2 (cfs)(2,b75
Toxicity Limits: IWC % (circle one) Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters w
Upstream Location
Downstream Location WZL, ;dgibly
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BODS (mg/1)
'yG
NHS N (mg/1)
_
D.O. (mg/1)
�p
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100ml)
I
pH (SU)
_
c0 �Yx(�il
r
D

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
MonthlyAverage
M ximum
Comments
Type of Product Produced I Lbs/Day Produced I Effluent Guideline Reference

Request No. :3931
• �.---------------------
Permit Number
Facility Name
Type of Waste
Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Requ.estor
Date of Request
Quad
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
: NCO027553
: WYSONG AND MILES COMPANY
: DOMESTIC
: EXISTING
: UT REEDY FORK.ZCRREFFr
C-NSW
030602
GUILFORD
RR& mo
JULE _S'HANKLIN
7/2/87
C20NW
Wast:eflow (mgd):
5-Day NOD (mg/1):
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1):
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
T'SS (mg/1):
Fecal Coliform (#/100ml):
pH (SU):
Drainage Area
Average Flow
Summer 7010
Winter 7Q10
3i i02
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
0.008
30
6
30
1000
6-9
MONITORING --
IYe1t_ _
�4-1 VED
dot o
( cY 1"EICH
REGIONAL OFFICE
(cfs)
: E)..`.J
(cfs)
: 0.Ci
(cfs)
: 0.0
(cfs)
: 0.075
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. NRCD
JUL 23 W
wkbn of
Environmental Management
Wln3ton-Salem Reg. Offi^a
Upstream (Y/N): N Location:
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location: APPROXIMATELY 200 FT BELOW DISCHARGE POINT
TiruLrlM►101
THESE
ARE THE EXISTING
LIMITS. ACCORDING TO DEM'S PROCEDURES FOR STREAMS
WITH
7010=0 AND 3002>0,
THIS
FACILITY'S
LIMITS WILL CHANGE AT THE NEXT
PERMIT
RENEWAL TO 5 & 2 FOR
SUMMER t
10 �: 4 FOR W
Ce..4n aS
ea-5
w. �n
�s Ps1n .
4 en w% p ex m +
d QS
� �-y-, ---- - --- - - -... --
Recommended by(( (ti_. .- Date
Reviewed by:
Tech. Support Supervisor
,4rrar(s
�j�vt�0 Regional Supervisor
I Permits & Engineering
-- Ott.__-... Date
---- -- --l/ a t e
- -
__tf __..... _._.. Date
AUG 06
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY