820126_Routine Inspection_20240916

Date of Visit: / Arrival Time: Departure Time: /�.'O ounty �}
Region:
Farm Name: y r
�-GU�A E�L'rRirr'� #/ VA�7 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 4'a/4&..�7 A2.! Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: !! Ca ? tm Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
%6� 6��
If
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Ej Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure Ej Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes
[—]No
NA
❑ NE
Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Ej NE
❑ Yes
d!�No
❑ NA
NE
Yes
[a'�o
NA
NE
Page I of 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes .E j o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: !9
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): e7'
Observed Freeboard (in): yin
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes '240 ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
JE2-110
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Mo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
of Approved Area
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑�Applicatioonni
6Outside
12. Crop Type(s) l -:L e2 ✓� � is !n) �ic Gr ��S Ya (r 4 c I J U—G
13. Soil Type(s): �J/> i� 10M., ��P
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Ef]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes _E3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes,a`&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,,®`iQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _[]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes fjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rambreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 4/d7`rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ,[]-�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes 04
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
;a"&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
La'Ao
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
..0'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
J:;Jko
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
12010o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: �el(/ 6��
Date: 4F/,3/,3L%
Page 3 of 3 511212020

racnrty NO.
Time I�
Time Out
`
Farm Name
Integrate
Owner
Site Re;, ,
Operator
No.
Back-up
No. _
cOC
Circle: General
or NPDES
Date
Design
Current Des!n Current
Wean - Feed
Farrow -Feed
Wean- Finish
Farrow - Firiist
Feed _Finish
Gilts !Boars
Farrow -.Wean
I Othe
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
(lain Gauge
I Wettable Acres
Soil Test
Weekly Freeboard
Daily Rainfall
SpraylFreeboard Drop
`heather Codes
120 min Inspections —
Waste Analysis:'t')�
Date
NdrogWtl t
a�
q
a
Sludge Survey %X/ 3 i I;-3
Calibration1GPM02 �3 1 /_
Waste Transfers —
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)