The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820213_Routine Inspection_20240919s kgt4+,v tS xqk tld tp {}lx.. t,. x,tl�etS #Ati#Mbdbr 4x at» ti$a IVl IOn Ofk �y at01} i{s £tA k 3u„vrti x#rts#ak,xi'°` d# krE„ #t*Y*.t+.- tb AXz er f�. t#•Fwxy t$z#a*Spa:x##t v.,z. m ip QSbxz e'�p °i a#yE `*Ax$a§ra#xk•#Zos: uyt'dta£tfi` $yoa++tbW##, *it4a,/ #tr:wep#A4'a$k $Sth 4t$tb#^•.. ry Type of Visit: QrCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: )2,koutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: i Arrival Time: t (� eparture Time: _ /P/ County�Jl Farm Name: , p Gr Owner Email: Owner Name: ��{/j� Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: �Csyj r P/1Title: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: tZ 4 s / 14 i Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: Region: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: »} 44r 10.1#$1r$#$mei &LL 89$4$$ 4ot Siea4&$Av Ifutoo"&4$ylq ##kk#$4§db9 r+694&$#:$iis kala• lxp.. 'S0g r k t5$k $#6@$§ 6ft#k$4$$4»» $ e9 nta4 kqppq qq��} 6#s3R&pWW§§$$qR$.$»#9 4$ Y 6F§$»Na§USS$$g$$ #$ssa$b$$Y$S #spi$K$:. In t#�E .kp$.y A A# p# . $46w.3fb6 $ S #1#�#i'99'$�'k$Wtdd#x#te tt AR, �x${++y�p#$ at �$$ £g (�gpr } k4$Y$4tr3a }�5yppgqffidk .$9Yi t#tr $�$ $�$ #$$$ aPkt1'Itr''wooR X#`$a4a �#i #d"$P$:�$$# ei � hSM+kg6�+d3r�gga®lr }#q§4#}S#3t'#,Y¢ab#$#:.$kt6 $ gp�'N6 k'$ kxtr#&p-r ###, S, $# 54g dy $+y $'�$8$3¥$ Aii` 5�, $&SdP'Aiit!• f b4 tbdYY$dddd 4.*40Axrta's 9 eb11t. #m#1 bYrk$a#pa ,.. Wean to Finish Layer 4d .#9£eaaa nS6&#n$..+e'fi%+k 0#&ux4..a,#y6 $ $ Dairy Cow { A+#a.�.$# a s Wean to Feeder Non -Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to F+" »' it Da HeiferFinishv a » t Farrow to Wean $a'$»e m r t »$ D Cow r'. Farrow to Feeder $ p ,'t$g$ „$ -' ' Non -Dairy # k$' Farrow to Finish »* Layers Beef Stocker ., Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder gA, Boars ems Pullets a4 Beef Brood Cow mx t @xv ss 9 f#tt ndN4xar hdtf ft* kk k. gF`px30a gAdSgg9 $A4Qi&4pa44$$&##A%$?a#It �4##$f &A $pg#$''s9 �# ##$$A4# Turkeys t$6$q{ d$24 $a$#a$ !"fttt sa{{i kd C aat a$x+»ud sB@a �$ SY*�q%VAb$rx$$ M1t $k#. $4 :d � at. tm.s 4»8yy$rth# Sx Y M.' �$ m#4 43b #k: GD##;#q4'$ $n #$»(. t�k,4�s,yppa$$ : u{ rtw #$ $k# dk4 ar$aw» gg »$ Turkey Poults i#@ ¢k#4 Ix51V ka##. tdkmn,rtA $$$ aF}YS * $$ I$ . k#R$ $$#at $$e#$4 mao po i$. 'mt 'fla 404.UR# g kUt $# ba » $ #$µ$ $43{ $$t A I $B Other I -. +# 0d8' x a 7 9$'i .. a u & YB' $ a s' e$ » x a Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes,,E!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes/' ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ YesZ2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued ]Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): oZ� Observed Freeboard (in): -72 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes jjmNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes J�RTo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,3-INo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [;6No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2'*�o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes 1::[,No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable ❑ Evidence of WindDrift Application Outside of Approved Area yCrop yWindow `❑ 12. CroP TYpe(s) i��%C�J tli /i/ztc C��taiJ (i%%TrLJ C(�//J� GcG4�i J �UKJ Al1 l/ a 13. Soil Type(s): p 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes CKo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 'E2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reauired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes 'Lallo ❑ Yes �o ❑ Yes ET'�o ❑ Yes E;;eNo ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes Eno ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [!] No 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes eNo ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [3"N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. cT ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ) °No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes _E�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ja'No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? _,E]"No ❑ Yes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Name: ! I a�ei5d� Phone: C/`(1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Date: %/q/�l Page 3 of 3 511212020 racuily NO. &Z 2 l-3 Time In Time Out _ Farm Name ,40e Imegraw Owner Site R4 Jperator Back-up _ GOC _ Circle: General or No. No. NPDES Desn Current Design Current Wean -Feed Farrow - Fsea Wean- Finish Farrow - Finish Feed _ Finish Gilts / Boars Farrow -.Wean I I fie-^ FREEBOARD: Design Observed Crop Yield Rain Gauge Soil Test l/ Weekly Freeboard _ Spray/Freeboard DrOP _ weather Codes Sludge Survey Calibration/GPM b Waste Transfers Rain Breaker Wettable Acres PLAT - Daily Rainfall 1-in Inspections 12o min Inspections Waste Analysis: Date Nitrogen (N) J- Date Nitrogen (N) 9t is yj 22•53