820430_Routine Inspection_20240830

Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Type of Visit: Q
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Vo: Departure Time: ounty: f
Farm Name: o wGwi✓� Owner Email:
Owner Name: �(�q/� // /G : Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region: )X7_d
Facility Contact: i�L 2zjhyy1f_ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: /i Integrator: O Ertl/'G
CertiSed Operator: Certification Number: 22L-12 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[—]Yes E2'lVo NA NE
Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Ej Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Ej NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q IVo
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E]"&o
NA
NE
Page I of 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes r ❑'130
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes F1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes -�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes E]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes J ' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
i
13. Soil Type(s):Jb
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes J❑ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes 12"'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes _{�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes AfrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes _[3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes QINo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ENo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

[Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [—]Yes ,eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon /�` f/
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: of `dl- .-
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _E5'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes .E]'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues �
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
n t
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 916 c?35 -%29S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
f
Date: 91-3& /?!�
511212020

r-acnny No. Yoh - C`�U Time In Time Out _
Farm Name p✓!e A4t� //f>��, lniegrato
Owner Site Pcac.
Operator No _
lack -up No. _
COC Circle: General or NPDES
Data
Wean - Feed
Design
IFarrow
Current Design Current
- Feed
Wean- Finish
Farrow - Firiis`
Feed _ Finish
Guts / Boars
Farrow -.Wean
j I Ode
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test o2 A'
Weekly Freeboard
Spray/Freeboard Drop _
`heather Codes
Waste Analysis:
Date
Sludge Survey
Calibration/GPM��_
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
Wettable Acres PLAT
— Daily Rainfall 1-in Inspections
120 min Inspections
Nitrogen (N)
Dote Nifmn.n IN\