The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820112_Routine Inspection_20240917Type of Visit: -p Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Pr*utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: fOG Departure Time: a 6 //h 7 County. Region: A6d Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 1�� !/ ` Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: �� Integrator: c�?� Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: ¢itrt#£9k 3hni^6at 8m>t Mie 4i1 jai,"�aLa cia�wa a#q aqi ��yy#ryryp (y9yp,ypq xrgrk4 Hvt $a#>a. g y � p#&;##ro+Y?.:ae.5t$§Ka#fl::au9tak}4rT�Sya a`y6%3#(#�0arya4ry9y�###%tl xks xitYGl,��j}}jIt�$@@nYr.3rt "{tY#r�fik 9q s4 dx x#aa #k�+k��C'ra>`d(d8Yk5 gig014 ,Aq+Ra{itn�K!$MIF`YY0#`:YbK{4#%:iR^#50-99#kdek Cfi 9EE§pp H ai taii AkY H9P+v ti4 �.}b+$B# 'iy5'2j�34%$dk 4$•4 T.9+"555k:•'91b "sa raaiEy##ir'•p�e$#'Afi $a W.h694't4 b55 8#.§k§#5%.%t!xd%a d4 �ti 55 $C d 3% C4 h$II k4B4a##i'#•gn $ a§rod# #tia ib[YR tx Op il# k%�rogkagstti yb.}#4yth riPb r. 9}9� gr, Q %a...4bxi #Ak 0.x 44159Y t•k.V % tro$& #$ ####ki ID# 4Q X'A$§ k# fr $a#3 4ak'&(,`69µap�## tYitvs43a q+Y+`GfiRsit a„km Ytlfr3AFfi 4fit#xk#�`.5$gspyyx .yg# * La er {�# Da Cow,? Wean to Finish #? Wean to Feeder 11 Dairy Calf' Feeder to Finish 7'4E UD"a#fl"sI »§a$ $; �§$$*rN�: �}'�aa§6aao�as $�,�$$ Asa "�) Dairy Heifer a Farrow to Wean§ k� { §��#tlsmsiwHilaesl�il�,�`4t .46.. D COW � }p Farrow to Feeder #a�.��£§#� $a§a#31n Rq� ,k� Non -Dairy Layers i( Beef Stocker) a' is Non -Layers Beef Feeder' $ Farrow to Finish Gilts $ Boars l Pullets $5; Beef Brood Cow'' It Turke S A9 a$ibro YSA x#n 4ktb-yd#wJti W Rxxa4 k$'@q rq #9ka$4+$$isC'ak Ni B#ee-#a§#YP*•T49£#'#a $=a*"#'«roa wfi#'n*u'k t48kkivB kB d•}N4 }a Nii.M#x.b8}6@G,Vk* Ra g@6a{$4rY do4 #✓^t #tas-.#kv $tfr rYt M3 ski##4+5.'c n#3krt$IV kqk itxi'x#}'flegx 9t$igaS qa is $}$AlinQlfii.x— t#m t°Y1i 4�9 a� ie ae so-s #sus # TurkeyPoults ak rxgx #+#•q##~ai# 45 '+4&5$#E'M. fl#pb48 vi+quY. �F �d# #G$Mk dp.y gq#yd#p.+g a01 t *ro Other •krs-mi'am+u'eyana+tea#. w•s# e1g$##saa%mma ::..„#Nxxfiu.+ •.... axaiz#:.:§mkea#,Yaax`aava aaat§aa-$*dkaaas'tr ro%iCSd##-9a Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes e`6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes H No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 71-= jDate of Inspection: a Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): _t Observed Freeboard (in): d 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes nj o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? T If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,C],No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes _L2"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [—]Yes MNo ❑ NA NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence ofWind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area _ 12. Crop Type(s):,n�rA� ecGo� Gc!J` 13. Soil Type(s): LJG / tl 14u 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑4No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes F7`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes PkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes P'No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 6No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - ` Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes C;�'No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Ppr-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes C7rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [D"No ❑ NA ❑ NE [-]Yes C7No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ffrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Q`f\o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 17(No ❑ NA ❑ NE �4Lle ISO AD Phone: Date: 511212020 raDNry NO, Farm Name Owner _ iJperator back -Up _ HOC _ Time In Circle: General or Time Out Integrara? _ Site Re;, No. No. NPDES Data Des' n Current I Design Current Wean -Feed Farrow -Feed Wean- Finish I Farrow - Finis' Feed _ Finlsh Gilts / Boars Farrow -.Wean � l ��= FREEBOARD: Design Observed Crop Yield —9"Vd Rain Gauge Soil Testa/Y%a Wettable Acres Weekly Freeboard L/ Daily Rainfall SpraylFreeboarJ Drop Weather Codes 120 min Inspections Waste Analysis: Date Nitrogen (N) Sludge Survey Calibration/GPM 4/a�la3 Waste Transfers Rain Breaker PLAT 1-in Inspections Date Nitrogen (N) d-6