820696_Routine Inspection_20240909

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:-O'goutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: di7/Gj/ (11 Arrival Time: ;30 Departure Time:�7 ounty: Region: ��)
Farm Name: z .40�4u Owner Email:
Owner Name: �w.•:Tt•c?i. rzo_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: / /
Certified Operator: ��/�%�°L cl�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
//
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
a
�
gg
rj
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder,
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
)�t,
{{
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
ff:
III
E D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
I.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finishli!
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
}}j
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
I
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
„ir�l`II
t +
tP1 i
.thH
TurkeyPoults
,� �
Other
, f
i FitYf t i
777�,.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,E 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ja'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes J[3 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2 r , , yw
Spillway?.
Designed Freeboard (in): �e
Observed Freeboard (in): !Z-7 j ds
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ,Eno
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes f o
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
r—
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ,�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes 4E!rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes -rj'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ Yes
P3"No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA
❑ Yes 1'No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ceNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes La'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [:]Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes J2"'No
❑ Yes P]-IL
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: C'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes J 'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ;z
3 4
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: , y U , 1
, 38' , S 6-
9/j -4
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes _.[TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes .EnNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1:1,1�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
12rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ETN� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: `<V
Date: of /C `� C/,
511212020

r acnny No. TimeoTime Out _
Farm Name /'2 Integrates
Owner Site Re;_
Operator No.
lack up No. _
COC Circle: General . or NPDES
Data
Design
Current
Design Current 1
Wean - Feed
I Farrow -Feed
Wean- Finish
I Farrow - FINsh
Feed: Finish
Gilts /Boars
Farrow -.Wean
I I Ofhe e_
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard __ .,- Daily Rainfall _ _
sprayfFreeboarJ Drop
`heather Codes 120 min Inspections _
Waste Analysis:
Date Ni Pgen (N)-
fiy ,
la 1
/ro ,-(I f, ;13 )a (ol
Sludge Survey 611i31 )_0 38
Calibration/GPM` /r h-p ) 4y / y S
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)