Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820042_Routine Inspection_20240821Iiype in visit: Av i,ompnance inspection lJ uperatron Review U Structure Evaluation (]'Technical Assistance I Reason for Visit:-ErRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Ly& // Farm Name: - Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: 441 /(e7� � it Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: Latitude: Time: /. County: Owner Email: Phone: Phone: Region: ' A) Integrator: Y Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: y##{at tBdaxa # gg qq p _ ryK}#bi0�2av#,.*r4#Ala. �Q2#n#tla%$.4N yRs4p#�'##5 ##sraaq'dndmma t+¥e y &0a �+ytyt;$'# HN,4d6a,#at#Fk s.111tZ141 #3#x �;, ¢¢� � �b5 #�&.� •W��d##saYamm4 a5 tu$a {D11-+r1�� `k')�, *t 4# nr4 Ga Px#R ttkx m95k 8V#•# �g��#aRK# #9yyaaq#B Wb ApPo 65'xtw{swaaiimr#s F ++� 5tY StFt4 aa¢"l��,pp} 46r+## #d#&#4895*A #GrAWA:,'+aQn aa*daa �qp tt r4iad#aa '#" roarsOapr mmaa §§gg �� ,4�ag qyyy,��}a ?3g�y k# 9 46 b0 #akP be to #Gr#tx4 +# 4#bR Rt ga ia8. weas�ravt &... ,t# J5t8#a1'a k'#'9 5k0 @ mct# 8#a M` d�dr 'xa b.a4#P1 n'...�..0 ,d k*x et%bff444E§5s##Rwb 4 as yv again Na to 44: & mb=k'mato *y §§#'.'�#4#L vadu,: t54Ws±s%ar ~�'a<tSat7 tFR Wean to Finish #` Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder r Non Layer Dairy Calf § FeedertoFinish ()Qv �(� �.. a a�sntr Farrow to Wean Dairy Heifer It @ a Dry Cow ; ua ga Farrow to Feeder rq ply am$ ac ,,xaS Non- Dai $� Farrow to Finish 1—layers Beef Stocker Beef Feeder to Gilts Non -Layers ak> Boars Pullets :off Beef Brood Cow a'r' tab#soars>�a aar#aa#�ara+^'t aarvaa�rrax«rd° ttd 5,tdc.rssszt a$ra r ###0&93¢W SW llij Lt4 $ as'b'#k $Kn4�'4 Turkeys 'ia .a 59a a#ter#ar.a'swvr #€a 't#gt x.a#S&3#9wb4 aaxt0 ## a 94r �.a 6#rEAi6* { as ax-A{#*+tit fi"4kff5t § a4&`a'�ad5x4a1¢'a rim �s" aa-° Turke Points Iry rk#'..$'k#m a r�� n# m* 'a m tt' �•aaea rra sago Otherke"aa"a*'pd a x.. exa -:dares+ A ra:xar* `raar Discharges and Stream Impacts Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [—]yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Ej`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E✓rr o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: t Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 1 19 Observed Freeboard (in):_ A 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes „❑ZVo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑/ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes JE'1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes •.❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4�1`No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ej`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window, ❑]Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): /(Lcj&" 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E;KNO ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes E]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 4ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes �No ❑ Yes ,E]'No ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes „❑`No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes fTNo 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes F`�JNo ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 2V- Date of inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes _,E�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 ❑ Yes —O'Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes B IQo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,E No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ffr—No ❑ Yes L3-No ❑ Yes �Ao ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE 0� Phone: ?Io Date: `(Fblb 511212020 racmry NO. _ `1 Time In Time Out Farm Name IntegratO' — Owner Site R% Operator No. Sack -up No. HOC Circle: General , or NPDES FREEBOARD: Design Observed Crop Yield Rain Gauge Soil TestWettable Acres Weekly Freeboard ii Daily Rainfall Spray/Freeboard DrOF Weather Codes 120 min Inspections — Waste Analysis: Date Nitrogen (N) �%JaS/,�U �•�S Data Sludge Survey / 6 4- 3.3 . �(r e D,6 Calibration/GPM dcc-e pt)O � Waste Transfers Rain Breaker PLAT 1-in Inspections Date Nitrogen (N) /ai/a� /1/9 lvoe , 7C.)