310822_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240919

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:'/ u j ,Q j Region:
Farm Name: (�Ut �Prr'�a� ,� —"� Owner Email:
a
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: "�` � �/�� p ____ -_ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
i
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
� 3/0 �a3
E
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes QAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: a
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [:) Yes [._�?Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 12z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EjlfVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [3/No ❑ NA ON I,
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes QAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes QI�0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes .211Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [:�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑.No ❑ NA ❑ NE i
acres determination? I
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? M Yes EJ�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes a<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement'? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 13'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes F3-N)o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

[Facility Number: JDate of Inspection: 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes E34 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E3"No [] NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [.�No [] NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [J/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E�-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�'�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [g o 0 NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
az
���M_�CW GA _51W 6�_ -4510-f vt�_ �
Reviewer/Inspector Name; L6Qj Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 5112/2020