310194_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240919

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: GKompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:O Departure Time: County Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: � (� _ Integrator: j
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish U Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dair
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers 113eef Feeder
Boars Pullets lBeef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turkey Poults I
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [] Yes ❑ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WN
� ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA [] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - jqq jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [:kKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
I
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): c i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [U,)do ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes G_<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [DAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [g, ]o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes FQ,/N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EaN/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ['�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes []]No ❑ NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes,check ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall 7 Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [] Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [:] No ❑ NA [�/NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - ( Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [1No ❑ NA ❑ NF
25. Is the facility out of compliance with pen-nit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [2-No ❑ N A ❑ N E
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [,j'1'es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0,?QA/ ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [:],il o 0 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes EKO ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [JXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EKO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E]�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [. to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use
drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
P wvvkp
�5� �e.�-�- owe, c�t�s rc., ,�;�-�► �1 ✓t�e.�-
l V\,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: '� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j 1AA Date: ,-T
Page 3 of 3 v,212020