NC0090336_Application_20240919

. STATE,
ROY COOPER 0; 'H
Governor ,�, , _
ELIZABETH S.BISERs'e °""
f Qum V00. /
Secretary ,mE
RICHARD E.ROGERS,JR. NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
September 19, 2024
Sandoval Farmhouse Event Center, LLC
Attn: Ernesto Sandoval, Owner
1916 Hendersonville Rd
Asheville, NC 28803
Subject: Permit Application
Application No. NC0090336
Sandoval Farmhouse Event Center, LLC
Buncombe County
Dear Applicant:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your application for a new NPDES WW permit, including
supporting documentation and your check number 11903 in the amount of$1,150.00 as payment of the application fee.
These items were received in our offices on September 19, 2024. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer
within the Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required
to complete evaluation of your application. Your timely and direct response to any such request will help to expedite the
review process. Please note that acceptance of the application does not guarantee a NPDES permit will be issued for the
proposed activity. A permit will only be issued following a complete review of the application, concluding the proposed
discharge is allowable per applicable statutes and rules.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://www.deq.nc.gov/permits-rules/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sin el
00T L�
ren hed •rd
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
cc: Kevin Davidson, P.E.-AWT
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
��. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S.Highway 70 Swannanoa.North Carolina 28778
wh� 828 296 4500

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. \``.��4�CAROI:y•N
,�moo:•oEESSIO, :;4 F1'a'`'
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502 - sat.
919-859-0669 = 024582
www.agriwaste.com ;az August 28, 2024
Mr. John Hennessy %, L'OOGE r‘`` RECEIVED
NPDES Permitting Program f
Division of Water Quality '(Z�1202
1617 Mail Service Center $EP 19 2024
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES
RE: Application for Individual NPDES Discharge System—Ernesto Sandoval Property
5 Greene Ln, Fletcher,NC 28732 (PIN: 968408169200000)
Dear Mr. Hennessy,
Enclosed please find information supporting an application for a new Individual NPDES
discharge system for a proposed Event Center located in Buncombe County,North Carolina. The
Event Center will consist of ten (10) 2 bedroom cabins and a 300 seat event center with kitchen.
The site has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by
Ferguson Walker L.S.S..
The proposed system is to be sized for 6,000 gallons per day and has been designed to convey all
wastewater from the proposed facilities, including greywater, to the new Discharge System. This
application is being submitted with the intent to gain an Individual Discharge Permit.
The following information is included with this letter:
NPDES - Form 1. Attachment A.
- Modified Application—Form 2A. Attachment B.
Soils Evaluation report by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management,
PLLC. Attachment C.
Correspondence from USGS. Attachment D.
- Correspondence from NCNHP. AttachmentE.
- Stream Classification.Attachment F.
Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature.Attachment G.
- Information on connection to Regional Sewer System.Attachment H.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis(EAA).Attachment I.
- Local Government Review Forms. Attachment J.
- Topography Map(per 40 CFR 122.21(0(7)). Attachment K.
Process Flow Diagram. Attachment L.
Nearby Facilities Discharge Limits.Attachment M.

The proposed discharge point is an unnamed tributary of Cane Creek on the subject
property. The discharge system will utilize the following components:
New Septic Tanks with Effluent Filter and/or new STEP systems
2X AdvanTex AX-100 Treatment Pod
- 3X AdvanTex AX-20 Treatment Pod
Re-circulation Tank
UV Disinfection
- Flow Meter
- Discharge Point with Rip-Rap
The proposed system will be comprised of two Phases. Phase 1 involves the installation
of 1 AX-20, 1 AX-100, a 2,500 gal grease tank, 5,000 gal septic tank, 8,000 gal
recirculation tank, pump vault, and a UV unit for the Event Center and Kitchen. Phase 2
will consist of the installation of the collection sewer for the cabins and a 2,500 gal septic
tank that will feed into the recirculation tank. Additional treatment units for Phase 2
include the installation of 2 AX-20 treatment pods and a second AX-100 treatment pod.
NPDES- Form 1
As part of Form 1, the feasibility of alternatives to discharging must be addressed. The
following alternatives are to be evaluated:
- Connection to a regional or municipal sewer collection system.
- Letter from the local or county health department describing the suitability
or non-suitability of the site for all types of wastewater ground adsorption
and innovative non-discharge systems, as well as documenting the repair
potential of the failed system.
Investigate land application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Modified Application—Form 2A
As part of Form 2A, monitoring Table A was completed. The facility is proposed, so no
site-specific effluent could be tested. The provided data is the average pollutant levels
from upstream and downstream domestic facilities.
Investigate Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Per the soil evaluation by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management,the site
does not have suitable soil to accommodate a non-discharge surface spray or drip
wastewater system (Attachment C). Based on the map provided, the majority of the
property is unsuitable for septic permitting.

7Q10&30Q2 Flow Estimates
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and
30Q2 flow estimates for the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed
discharge point is an unnamed tributary to Cane Creek. The analysis from USGS
indicates both the 7Q10 and 30Q2 discharge for the point in question are positive The
annual low-flow yields for the 7Q 10 is about 0.31 cfsm, and the annual low-flow yields
for the 30Q2 for 0.58cfsm(Attachment D).
Endangered Species Information
The NC Heritage Program was contacted to gather endangered species information. One
freshwater fish, Percina burtoni, is listed as being within a one-mile radius of the
property, however it is listed as no longer occurring in this region. No species were found
within the project area that hold federal endangered status(Attachment E).
Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature
The discharge point is a unnamed tributary of Crane Creek located on the applicants
property. A map showing the path from the discharge point to the first "blue-line"
stream, as shown on the NC DEQ Stream Classification Map, can be seen in(Attachment
G).
Receiving Stream Crane Creek
Stream Class C
Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System
Connection to a sewer collection system will likely not be available. Correspondence
from Buncombe County Metropolitan Sewerage District (MSD) Planning &
Development indicates that there were no lines in the area. A MSD map showed that the
nearest sewer system to the applicants property is 3.96 miles. At an estimated cost of
$150/ft, the cost to extend the sewer line would be $3,136,320 (plus engineering and tap
fees) (Attachment H).

Engineering Alternatives Analysis
An Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) has been completed for this site and is
included as (Attachment I). The completed EAA demonstrates that a wastewater
treatment system permitted as an Individual Discharge is the only feasible option for this
site. We have exhausted all other options for this site as follows:
a.) connection to a municipal or regional sewer collection system
- Not feasible due to costs (at the present time).
b.) subsurface disposal
- Inadequate soil for a subsurface absorption system.
c.) wastewater irrigation (drip and spray)
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
non-discharge ground absorption system.
d.) reclaimed-water systems
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
reclaimed water system. No reasonable ability to operate
as a bulk distributor of reclaimed water.
e.) Any viable combination of the above
- There are no viable combinations of the above due to soil
and cost limitations.
Local Government Review Forms
As part of the EAA, Local Government Review Forms were sent to Buncombe County
and the City of Fletcher. A copy of the form submittals is included as Attachment J. Both
signed copies have been received and are attached.
Topography Map
A topographic map(per 40 CFR 122.21(0(7))is included as Attachment K.
Process Flow Diagram
A process flow diagram for the proposed system is included as Attachment L.

Suggested Permit Compliance Limits
Suggested permit limits are based on the limits of both upstream and downstream
neighboring facilities. An existing facility, Flesher's Fairview Rest Home, is located 3.2
miles upstream of the proposed facility location, with a permitted daily discharge of
35,000 GPD. Located 1.2 miles downstream of the proposed facility is Cane Creek
Middle School with a permitted daily discharge of 12,000 GPD. The BOD and TSS
values are based on the average values of the permitted concentrations of these facilities.
The Fecal Coliform value is based on the Cane Creek impairment limits(Attachment M).
Effluent Characteristics Limits
Monthly Average Daily Max
Flow 6,000 gpd 6,000 gpd
BOD, 5-day 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L
Total Suspended Soils 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L
Fecal 200 MPN/100 mL 400 MPN/100 mL
I appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. If you have any
questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering

Attachment List
Attachment A NPDES—Form 1
Attachment B Modified Application—Form 2A
Attachment C Land Resource Management Soils Evaluation Report
Attachment D Correspondence from USGS
Attachment E Correspondence from NCNHP
Attachment F Stream Classification
Attachment G Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature
Attachment H Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System
Attachment I Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Attachment J Local Government Review Forms
Attachment K Topographic Map
Attachment L Process Flow Diagram
Attachment M Nearby Facilities Discharge Limits

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No.2040-0004
Form U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
NPDES GENERAL INFORMATION
SECTION 1.ACTIVITIES REQUIRING AN NPDES PERMIT(40 CFR 122.21(f)and (f)(1))
1.1 Applicants Not Required to Submit Form 1
Is the facility a new or existing publicly owned Is the facility a new or existing treatment works
1.1.1 12
treatment works? 1. treating domestic sewage?
If yes,STOP. Do NOT complete 2 No If yes.STOP.Do NOT ID No
Form 1.Complete Form 2A. complete Form 1.Complete
Form 2S.
1.2 Applicants Required to Submit Form 1
1.2.1 Is the facility a concentrated animal feeding 1.2.2 Is the facility an existing manufacturing,
operation or a concentrated aquatic animal commercial.mining,or silvicultural facility that is
a production facility? currently discharging process wastewater'?
o D Yes 4 Complete Form 1 0 No El Yes 4 Complete Form 0 No
and Form 2B. 1 and Form 2C.
z
c 1.2.3 Is the facility a new manufacturing,commercial. 1.2.4 Is the facility a new or existing manufacturing,
10
CD mining,or silvicultural facility that has not yet commercial,mining,or silvicultural facility that
commenced to discharge? discharges only nonprocess wastewater?
c Yes 4 Complete Form 1 0 No ElYes 4 Complete Form No
and Form 2D. 1 and Form 2E.
1.2.5 Is the facility a new or existing facility whose
discharge is composed entirely of stormwater
associated with industrial activity or whose
discharge is composed of both stormwater and
non-stormwater?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1 No
and Form 2F
unless exempted by
40 CFR
122.26(b)(14)(x)or
b 15 .
SECTION 2. NAME, MAILING ADDRESS,AND LOCATION(40 CFR 122.21(f)(2))
2.1 Facility Name
Sandoval Farmhouse Event Center,LLC
O 2.2 EPA Identification Number
8
J
2.3 Facility Contact
Name(first and last) Title Phone number
43 Ernesto Sandoval Owner [phone]
v
o/ Email address
[e-mail]
; 2.4 Facility Mailing Address
Street or P.O.box
1916 Hendersonville Road
City or town State ZIP code
Asheville NC 28803
EPA Form 3510-1(revised 3-19) Page 1

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Form Approved 03/05/19
(sj (49`►W DOCtr3 OMB No.2040-0004
y 13 2.5 Facility Location
EStreet, route number,or other specific identifier
0 5 Greene Lane
rn
c o County name County code(f known)
Buncombe
o 3 City or town State ZIP code
z Fletcher NC 28732
SECTION 3. SIC AND NAICS CODES(40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))
3.1 SIC Code(s) Description(optional)
7999 Event Center 1
an
m
v
0
U
N
U
3.2 NAICS Code(s) Description(optional)
SECTION 4. OPERATOR INFORMATION(40 CFR 122.21(f)(4))
4.1 Name of Operator
AQWA
4.2 Is the name you listed in Item 4.1 also the owner?
o ❑ Yes El No
4.3 Operator Status
❑ Public—federal ❑ Public—state ❑ Other public(specify)
0 El Private ❑ Other(specify)
4.4 Phone Number of Operator
[phone]
4.5 Operator Address
Street or P.O.Box
2604 Willis Court
o
•c City or town State ZIP code
o Wilson NC 27896
e
Email address of operator
0 [e-mail]
SECTION 5.INDIAN LAND(40 CFR 122.21(f)(5))
0 5.1 Is the facility located on Indian Land?
CO
'v CO
-r ❑Yes El No
EPA Form 3510-1(revised 3-19) Page 2

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Form Approved 03105/19
OMB No.2040-0004
SECTION 6. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS(40 CFR 122.21(f)(6))
6.1 Existing Environmental Permits(check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit number for each)
d ❑ NPDES(discharges to surface ❑ RCRA(hazardous wastes) ❑ UIC(underground injection of
o w water) fluids)
L
C G
❑ PSD(air emissions) ❑ Nonattainment program(CAA) ❑ NESHAPs(CM)
❑ Ocean dumping(MPRSA) ❑ Dredge or fill(CWA Section 404) ❑Other(specify)
SECTION 7. MAP(40 CFR 122.21(0(7))
7.1 Have you attached a topographic map containing all required information to this application?(See instructions for
12- specific requirements.)
co
❑r Yes ❑ No El CAFO—Not Applicable(See requirements in Form 2B.)
SECTION 8. NATURE OF BUSINESS(40 CFR 122.21(f)(8))
8.1 Describe the nature of your business.
Weekend Event Center with Kitchen and dwelling units for visitation.
e,
aa)
c
y
O
a)
2
SECTION 9. COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES(40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
9.1 Does your facility use cooling water?
d ❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 10.1.
CD
9.2 Identify the source of cooling water.(Note that facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at
2 40 CFR 125,Subparts I and J may have additional application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r).Consult with your
NPDES permitting authority to determine what specific information needs to be submitted and when.)
Y
U -
c
SECTION 10.VARIANCE REQUESTS(40 CFR 122.21(f)(10))
10.1 Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(m)?(Check all that
apply.Consult with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and
when.)
❑ Fundamentally different factors(CWA ❑ Water quality related effluent limitations(CWA Section
Section 301(n)) 302(b)(2))
El Non-conventional pollutants(CWA ❑ Thermal discharges(CWA Section 316(a))
co
Section 301(c)and(g))
Q Not applicable
EPA Form 3510-1(revised 3-19) Page 3

•
c=i Ide ":a1: ,,Prber r;PDES Perm t C;u-te• Fat.'/Na. Form 4pre:ed G3 OS 19
OMB No 2C4-C 4
SECTION 11.CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT(40 CFR 122.22(a)and(d))
11 1 In Column 1 below,mark the sections of Form 1 that you have completed and are submitting v.ith your app!:ca!cn
For each section specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the perma.ng authonty Note
that not all applicants are required to pro;'de attachments
Column 1 Column 2
0 Section 1 Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit El v, attachments
0 Section 2.Name.Mailing Address,and Location ❑ w'attachments
0 Section 3:SIC Codes ❑ wi attachments
0 Section 4 Operator Information ❑ vr'attachments
0 Section 5:Indian Land ❑ wi attachments
Section 6:Existing Environmental Permits ❑ w attachments
wl topographic
0 Section 7:Map ❑r map ❑ w!additional attachments
Er)
o El Section 8:Nature of Business ❑ v„attachments
0 Section 9 Cooling Water Intake Structures ❑ wi attachments
0 Section 10 Vanance Requests ❑ v;'attachments
-0
r' ❑ Section 11:Checklist and Certification Statement ❑ vr;attachments
11.2 Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supen;s:on
in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information. the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and
belief,true,accurate. and complete I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false informaton
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for km...mg violations
Name(print or type first and last name) Official title
Ernesto Sandoval Owner
Signature Date signed
EPA Fern 3510.1 ire:sod 3-1111 Pap 4
Scanned with CamScanner

North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality Modified Application Form 2A
Division of Water Resources Revised March 2021
Modified Application
Form 2A
Minor Sewage Facilities < 0.1 MGD
and No Pretreatment Program
NPDES Permitting Program
Note: Complete this form if your facility is a MINOR new or existing publicly owned treatment works.

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Form NC Department of Environmental Quality-Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
NPDES MINOR SEWAGE FACILITIES(Before completing this form,please read the instructions.Failure to follow
the instructions ma result in denial of the(if,.ication.
SECTION 1.BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS(40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)and(9))
1.1 Facility name
Sandoval Farmhouse Event Center,LLC
Mailing address(street or P.O.box)
1916 Hendersonville Road
City or town State ZIP code
Asheville NC 28803
Contact name(first and last) Title Phone number Email address
Ernesto Sandoval Owner [phone] [e-mail]
Location address(street,route number,or other specific identifier) ❑ Same as mailing address
is
5 Greene Lane
w
City or town State ZIP code
Fletcher North Carolina 28732
1.2 Is this application for a facility that has yet to commence discharge?
❑ Yes 4 See instructions on data submission ❑ No
requirements for new dischargers.
1.3 Is applicant different from entity listed under Item 1.1 above?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 1.4.
Applicant name
Applicant address(street or P.O. box)
0
E`o City or town State ZIP code
0
Contact name(first and last) Title Phone number Email address
1.4 Is the applicant the facility's owner,operator, or both?(Check only one response.)
Owner ❑ Operator ❑ Both
1.5 To which entity should the NPDES permitting authority send correspondence?(Check only one response.)
❑ Facility ❑r Applicant ❑ Facility and applicant
(they are one and the same)
1.6 Indicate below any existing environmental permits.(Check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit
number for each.)
Existing Environmental Permits
a 111 NPDES(discharges to surface RCRA(hazardous waste) UIC(underground injection
water) control)
E
❑ PSD(air emissions) ❑ Nonattainment program(CM) ❑ NESHAPs(CAA)
a� —
4 ❑ Ocean dumping(MPRSA) ❑ Dredge or fill(CWA Section ❑ Other(specify)
404)
Page 1

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
1.7 Provide the collection system information requested below for the treatment works.
Municipality Population Collection System Type
Served Served (indicate percentage) Ownership Status
100 %separate sanitary sewer 0 Own ❑ Maintain
to co 300 %combined storm and sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
in 0 Unknown 0 Own 0 Maintain
c _ %separate sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
.� %combined storm and sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
a 0 Unknown 0 Own 0 Maintain
a %separate sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
c %combined storm and sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
E0 Unknown 0 Own 0 Maintain
cu %separate sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
›n %combined storm and sanitary sewer 0 Own 0 Maintain
c ❑ Unknown 0 Own 0 Maintain
o
Total
o
d Population 300
c�i Served
Separate Sanitary Sewer System Combined Storm and
Sanitary Sewer
Total percentage of each type of 100 %
sewer line(in miles)
z' 1.8 Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
C
_o 0 Yes El No
`m 1.9 Does the facility discharge to a receiving water that flows through Indian Country?
c ❑ Yes El No
1.10 Provide design and actual flow rates in the designated spaces. Design Flow Rate
.006 mgd
Wi
= Annual Average Flow Rates(Actual)
a 2 Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
-0ce
c CO mgd mgd mgd
vi a: Maximum Daily Flow Rates(Actual)
cu
en Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
mgd mgd mgd
u) 1.11 Provide the total number of effluent discharge points to waters of the State of North Carolina by type.
.o Total Number of Effluent Discharge Points by Type
a a Constructed
Pi- Treated Effluent Untreated Effluent Combined Sewer Bypasses Emergency
z03 a Overflows Overflows
U
tn
c5 1
Page 2

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Outfalls Other Than to Waters of the State of North Carolina
1.12 Does the POTW discharge wastewater to basins,ponds,or other surface impoundments that do not have outlets
for discharge to waters of the State of North Carolina?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 1.14.
1.13 Provide the location of each surface impoundment and associated discharge information in the table below.
Surface Impoundment Location and Discharge Data
Average Daily Volume Continuous or Intermittent
Location Discharged to Surface (check one)
Impoundment
❑ Continuous
gpd ❑ Intermittent
❑ Continuous
gpd ❑ Intermittent
❑ Continuous
gpd ❑ Intermittent
1.14 Is wastewater applied to land?
❑ Yes ❑r No 4 SKIP to Item 1.16.
0 1.15 Provide the land application site and discharge data requested below.
Land Application Site and Discharge Data
a Continuous or
o Average Daily Volume
Location Size A lied Intermittent
1 pp (check one)
acresgpd ❑ Continuous
o 0 Intermittent
t acresgpd 0 Continuous
o ❑ Intermittent
❑ Continuous
R acres gpd 0 Intermittent
U)
1.16 Is effluent transported to another facility for treatment prior to discharge?
0
❑ Yes ❑✓ No 4 SKIP to Item 1.21.
1.17 Describe the means by which the effluent is transported(e.g.,tank truck,pipe).
1.18 Is the effluent transported by a party other than the applicant?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 1.20.
1.19 Provide information on the transporter below.
Transporter Data
Entity name Mailing address(street or P.O.box)
City or town State ZIP code
Contact name(first and last) Title
Phone number Email address
Page 3

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
1.20 In the table below,indicate the name,address,contact information, NPDES number,and average daily flow rate of the
receiving facility.
Receiving Facility Data
0 Facility name Mailing address(street or P.O.box)
City or town State ZIP code
0
anContact name(first and last) Title
0
Phone number Email address
oNPDES number of receiving facility(if any) 0 None Average daily flow rate mgd
0 1.21 Is the wastewater disposed of in a manner other than those already mentioned in Items 1.14 through 1.21 that do
not have outlets to waters of the State of North Carolina(e.g.,underground percolation,underground injection)?
❑ Yes ❑ No -)SKIP to Item 1.23.
U
0 1.22 Provide information in the table below on these other disposal methods.
Information on Other Disposal Methods
-c o Disposal Location of Size of Annual Average Continuous or Intermittent
Method Disposal Site Disposal Site Daily Discharge (check one)
Description Volume
acres gpd 0 Continuous
❑ Intermittent
❑ Continuous
acres gpd 0 Intermittent
acresgpd El Continuous
❑ Intermittent
1.23 Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(n)?(Check all that apply.
n Consult with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and when.)
o ❑ Discharges into marine waters(CWA ❑ Water quality related effluent limitation(CWA Section
> cr
Section 301(h)) 302(b)(2))
El Not applicable
1.24 Are any operational or maintenance aspects(related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality)of the treatment works
the responsibility of a contractor?
El Yes ❑ No+SKIP to Section 2.
1.25 Provide location and contact information for each contractor in addition to a description of the contractor's operational
and maintenance responsibilities.
Contractor Information
Contractor 1 T Contractor 2 Contractor 3
Contractor name
AQWA
(company name)
Mailing address
0 2604 Willis Court
(street or P.O.box)
S City,state,and ZIP Wilson,NC,27896
code
oContact name(first and Steve Barry
c� last)
Phone number [phone]
Email address [e-mail]
Operational and Sample and Maintain the
maintenance System
responsibilities of
contractor
Page 4

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
SECTION 2.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)and(2))
c Outfalls to Waters of the State of North Carolina
2.1 Does the treatment works have a design flow greater than or equal to 0.1 mgd?
rn
c ❑ Yes 0 No 4 SKIP to Section 3.
= 2.2 Provide the treatment works'current average daily volume of inflow Average Daily Volume of Inflow and Infiltration
0
'1 and infiltration.
gpd
Indicate the steps the facility is taking to minimize inflow and infiltration.
-o
A
0
0
2.3 Have you attached a topographic map to this application that contains all the required information?(See instructions for
specific requirements.)
rn�
0
0 ❑ Yes ❑ No
E 2.4 Have you attached a process flow diagram or schematic to this application that contains all the required information?
(See instructions for specific requirements.)
o cm
LT. ra
❑ Yes El No
2.5 Are improvements to the facility scheduled?
❑ Yes El No 4 SKIP to Section 3.
= Briefly list and describe the scheduled improvements.
m 1.
a
E
d
2.
0
d 3.
C)
= 4.
U)
0 2.6 Provide scheduled or actual dates of completion for improvements.
Scheduled or Actual Dates of Completion for Improvements
Affected Attainment of
Scheduled Begin End Begin
> Outfalls Operational
2 Improvement Construction Construction Discharge
Level
(from above) (list outfall (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) (MMJDD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)
)
1.
V
d
2.
cn
3.
4.
2.7 Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other federal/state requirements been obtained?Briefly explain your
response.
❑ Yes El No ❑ None required or applicable
Explanation:
Page 5

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
SECTION 3.INFORMATION ON EFFLUENT DISCHARGES(40 CFR 122.216)(3)to(5))
3.1 Provide the following information for each outfall.(Attach additional sheets if you have more than three outfalls.)
Outfall Number ool Outfall Number Outfall Number
State North Carolina
In County ounty
Buncombe
o City or town Fletcher
0
c
s Distance from shore ft. ft. ft.
0.
d Depth below surface ft. ft. ft.
0
Average daily flow rate .006 mgd mgd mgd
Latitude 35' 29' 1.26" N ° „
Longitude -82° 25 44.5" W ' "
3.2 Do any of the outfalls described under Item 3.1 have seasonal or periodic discharges?
co
o ❑ Yes El No 4 SKIP to Item 3.4.
3.3 If so,provide the following information for each applicable outfall.
s
tn Outfall Number Outfall Number Outfall Number
0
o
Number of times per year
discharge occurs
a Average duration of each
`o discharge(specify units)
oAverage flow of each mgd mgd mgd
0) discharge
9
co
in Months in which discharge
occurs
3.4 Are any of the outfalls listed under Item 3.1 equipped with a diffuser?
❑✓ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.6.
3.5 Briefly describe the diffuser type at each applicable outfall.
0.
1- Outfall Number 001 Outfall Number Outfall Number
N
Rip Rap
0
c vi 3.6 Does the treatment works discharge or plan to discharge wastewater to waters of the State of North Carolina from
d = one or more discharge points?
w ❑ Yes ❑ No-*SKIP to Section 6.
Page 6

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
3.7 Provide the receiving water and related information(if known)for each outfall.
Outfall Number 001 Outfall Number Outfall Number
Receiving water name Crane Creek
Name of watershed,river, French Broad
c or stream system
a U.S. Soil Conservation
dService 14-digit watershed 12-digit HUC 060101050701
o code
== Name of state
1O
management/river basin North Carolina French Broad
a)
c U.S. Geological Survey
'� 8-digit hydrologic 06010105
cc cataloging unit code
Critical low flow(acute) 30Q2 0.49 cfs cfs cfs
Critical low flow(chronic) 7Q10 0.26 cfs cfs cfs
Total hardness at critical mg/L of mglL of mg/L of
low flow N/A CaCO3 CaCO3 CaCO3
3.8 Provide the following information describing the treatment provided for discharges from each outfall.
Outfall Number 001 Outfall Number Outfall Number
Highest Level of 0 Primary ❑ Primary ❑ Primary
Treatment(check all that ❑ Equivalent to ❑ Equivalent to ❑ Equivalent to
apply per outfall) secondary secondary secondary
El Secondary El Secondary ❑ Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Advanced ❑ Advanced
❑ Other(specify) 0 Other(specify) El Other(specify)
c
0 -
'Q
.0 Design Removal Rates by
Outfall
N
BODs or CBODs >95
E
TSS >95 % % %
H
PI Not applicable 0 Not applicable El Not applicable
Phosphorus
❑ Not applicable ❑Not applicable ❑ Not applicable
Nitrogen >95 NH3
Other(specify) 0 Not applicable ❑Not applicable ❑ Not applicable
%
Page 7

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
3.9 Describe the type of disinfection used for the effluent from each outfall in the table below.If disinfection varies by
season,describe below.
0
c Outfall Number 001 Outfall Number Outfall Number
1 Disinfection type Dual UV
Seasons used all
d Dechlorination used? El Not applicable ❑ Not applicable 0 Not applicable
❑ Yes ❑ Yes 0 Yes
❑ No 0 No 0 No
3.10 Have you completed monitoring for all Table A parameters and attached the results to the application package?
0 Yes Comparable Facilities ❑ No
3.11 Have you conducted any WET tests during the 4.5 years prior to the date of the application on any of the facility's
discharges or on any receiving water near the discharge points?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.13.
3.12 Indicate the number of acute and chronic WET tests conducted since the last permit reissuance of the facility's
discharges by outfall number or of the receiving water near the discharge points.
Outfall Number Outfall Number Outfall Number
Acute Chronic Acute Chronic Acute Chronic
Number of tests of discharge
water
Number of tests of receiving
water
3.14 Does the POTW use chlorine for disinfection,use chlorine elsewhere in the treatment process,or otherwise have
reasonable potential to discharge chlorine in its effluent?
❑ Yes 4 Complete Table B,including chlorine. ❑r No 4 Complete Table B,omitting chlorine.
3.15 Have you completed monitoring for all applicable Table B pollutants and attached the results to this application
package?
❑ Yes ✓❑ No
Have you completed monitoring for all applicable Table D pollutants required by your NPDES permitting authority and
3.18 attached the results to this application package?
❑ Yes a No additional sampling required by NPDES
permitting authority.
Page 8

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
3.19 Has the POTW conducted either(1)minimum of four quarterly WET tests for one year preceding this permit application
or(2)at least four annual WET tests in the past 4.5 years?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 Complete tests and Table E and SKIP to
Item 3.26.
3.20 Have you previously submitted the results of the above tests to your NPDES permitting authority?
El Yes ❑ No 4 Provide results in Table E and SKIP to
Item 3.26.
3.21 Indicate the dates the data were submitted to your NPDES permitting authority and provide a summary of the results.
Date(s)Submitted Summary of Results
(MWDDNYYY)
v
m
c
O
CO 3.22 Regardless of how you provided your WET testing data to the NPDES permitting authority,did any of the tests result in
toxicity?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.26.
0 3.23 Describe the cause(s)of the toxicity:
•
w
3.24 Has the treatment works conducted a toxicity reduction evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.26.
3.25 Provide details of any toxicity reduction evaluations conducted.
3.26 Have you completed Table E for all applicable outfalls and attached the results to the application package?
❑ Yes Not Applicable ❑ Not applicable because previously submitted
information to the NPDES•ermittin• authori .
Page 9

NPOES Permit Number ac.'ry Nare Modfed?gp,ca.on Fam 2A
MoMed March 2021
SECTION 6.CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT(40 CFR 122.22(a)and(d))
6.1 In Column 1 below,mark the sections of Form 2A that you have completed and are submitting with your application.For
each section,specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority.Note that not
all applicants are required to provide attachments
Column 1 Column 2
• Section 1:Basic Application
Information for All Applicants ❑ w/variance request(s) ❑ wl addtional attachments
O Section 2:Additional El wi topographic map 0 wl process flow dagram
Information ❑ wl additional attachments
© w/Table A ❑ w/Table D
O Section 3:Information on ❑ wl Table B ❑ w/additional attachments
Effluent Discharges
❑ w/Table C
Section 4:Not Applicable
41.
0
.41
Section 5:Not Applicable
_ ❑ Section 6:Checklist and ❑ w/attachments
Certification Statement
6.2 Certification Statement
d
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted.Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,or those persons directly responsible
for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true.accurate,and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information.including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name(print or type first and last name) Official title
Ernesto Sandoval Owner
Signature Date signed
Page to
Scanned with CamScanner

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Outfall Number Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE A.EFFLUENT PARAMETERS FOR ALL POTWS
Maximum Daily Discharge Average Daily Discharge Analytical ML or MDL
Pollutant Value Units Value Units Number of Methods (include units)
Samples
Biochemical oxygen demand
0 ML
o BOD5 or o CBOD5 45 mg/L 30 mg/L 1 SM5210B 20 mg/L O MDL
(report one)
Fecal coliform 400/100 MPN/mL 200/100 MPN/mL 1 IDEXX Coliform t MPN/100mL D ML
O MDL
Design flow rate 6000 gal/day 6000 gal/day 30
pH(minimum)
pH(maximum)
Temperature(winter)
Temperature(summer)
Total suspended solids(TSS) 45 mg/L 30 mg/L 1 SM2540D 2.5 mg/mL El ML
O MDL
s Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures(i.e.,methods)approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I,subchapter N or 0.See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
Page 11

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Outfall Number Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE B.EFFLUENT PARAMETERS FOR ALL POTWS WITH A FLOW EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Maximum Daily Discharge Average Daily Discharge Analytical ML or MDL
Pollutant Value Units Value Units Number of Method, (include units)
Samples
•
Ammonia(as N) ❑ML
❑MDL
Chlorine ❑ML
(total residual,TRC)2 ❑MDL
Dissolved oxygen ❑ML
❑MDL
Nitrate/nitrite ❑ML
❑MDL
Kjeldahl nitrogen ❑ML
❑MDL
Oil and grease ❑ML
❑MDL
Phosphorus ❑ML
❑MDL
Total dissolved solids ❑ML
0 MDL
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures(i.e.,methods)approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I,subchapter N or 0.See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
2 Facilities that do not use chlorine for disinfection,do not use chlorine elsewhere in the treatment process,and have no reasonable potential to discharge chlorine in their effluent are not
required to report data for chlorine.
EPA Form 3510-2A(Revised 3-19) Page 12

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Outfall Number Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS FOR SELECTED POTWS
Maximum Daily Discharge Average Daily Discharge Analytical ML or MDL
Pollutant Number of Method', (include units)
Value Units Value Units Samples
Metals,Cyanide,and Total Phenols
❑ML
Hardness(as CaCO3) ❑MDL
Antimony,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Arsenic,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Beryllium,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Cadmium,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Chromium,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Copper,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Lead,total recoverable 0 ML
❑MDL
Mercury,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Nickel,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Selenium,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Silver,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Thallium,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Zinc,total recoverable ❑ML
❑MDL
Cyanide ❑ML
❑MDL
Total phenolic compounds ❑ML
❑MDL
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acrolein ❑ML
❑MDL
Acrylonitrile ❑ML
❑MDL
Benzene ❑ML
❑MDL
Bromoform ❑ML
❑MDL
EPA Form 3510-2A(Revised 3-19) Page 13

a
NC' J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
J O J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J O J 0 _J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 _J O J 0 J 0 J Cl
u G c ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ a
g
o 2 ` 0
0° o 2
CU
aU
0
U
p
>.t
CC C)
c m
a
0
O N
C C)
W d
.0 E
fO
E Z
z
a
8 En
p =
U
Cn
0
A
E
a =
C)
O)
CC
C)
Q
0)
E C)
z 2
U
co
C) 4
C
tC E
V) U
o
E• o a
iv
Z 0 p
E W
F- E
a V z
Cn J •E
X 7
d LLI
N m >
CC
U-
I-
I-
W
C) I
Q c a) _
cu c
n Q c a`) c m rn
E a a) CO L m _c a) a) c L a) a) rS
z I— CC g N a) da) c O N c c C) O c a
Z pE >` coE CO T d 0. O C) _c
=▪ W L O 0 C 0 _c _c O L O O O N O L L O O y
U co d L Uor
o J d N O L O O O U O O O E U p O O QQ
u_ N L L L O O O O O N O ,= c `p L L
U U
9 W c N 0 O 2 L L CV L L L N d U Q) Cl)L _ O_
p 0 0 O p O O U U ' U U U .a T > T N U c 7
d 0 -O O O O :E O L C ? 'D >. -C L_ L_ N f` O _ N r)
W W CC L L .E U ,� U N co • N cl. L C) Cl) C) _ y O • _ _ €
J 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ...c- . � a- LU . aC .- I- I- <- O
m LL
Q d I
I- W

m 03 n -1
D
CD D
N
_o CO CO CO CO = > D CI' N m 'O A N N.) A N N N 'O d -{ W
3 A CD CD CD 7 7 7 Q N ? lD C 7 A 03 J, ? 6 6 k 5 n' m m
cn CD O O d N N C p d d _Q_. d 0 `� O C7 y
Gov N d N 7 (OD 7- 7- N n 7' "Q C = O O• n �_ m
0 453 N CD 7 5 7' 0 CD CD O O ? O 0.�. Oi O O T
o `G 7 CD .• ,,C CD C7 0 01 7 7 'O C' fl. -0 r a
co m o o o o h ro CD ' o C
< 7 7 co 3 - = 7 = o F m —
ro ro v 7
c�i 0 N CD N p 7 c m
0 0 o 0 o O 0 3 co = —1 z
, c7n CD n o o .. m
N c D
o_ D
N
Rl
VI
-I
T
0
73
Na
m co
x m m o
r cn
m
c m
m 3
v CDz
5
v _
A (I)
C =
7 d
CA A
-n
C r,
d
c z
Co
CD
m
Is..
CD
iii
CO
CD
a v
7
C)v
• 7• 0
d
ua =
(I) -
•
Z 5
°1 3 co
Crvro
ro
N o
3 =
co c)
0 -
Q.
o =
- ci
d
0
0
n
a
Co
n
n S.-0
m ". o
❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 12000000000000000000000 0000 m p ss o
m K K K K K K K K K K K K K KKK K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K ti r ro 3
Co O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r- o
r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r r j
C"

CO
N N J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
O J 0 J O J O J O J C] J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J O N
co
O ` a)
�0 O
1p
1p
T L
IC N
C m
Q
w
O U)
i d
0 O.
N
E Z N
0
z
io 0
EP
6 La
O L
C)
N_
tT CH
o
a)
O)
/C
CD
a
E a
Z
= >
U
Co
LL
coal 4
C
(I) C)
y
0
E 0 >.
0 CL .=
cu
Z 0 0
€ 1- E
a U =
v.) J E CD
K =
Z
CC
0
Ll
SS
a)
Lu C tCu a, t 0(6
.:C _c LC .L-1
a) o) (u a) a) a)
E L ?, T d C
E a . c N O_ L C a7 a) c 0 a) a) a) c ch
C a) a) >, ^ D_ a) C a, a) a) ai c c c a] -V
Z Z w a) L O >, Q. C C]. -C N O. IC CU L N N N �N a) ca c C c-
O W Oci, X L L CC CO C C Cco Is 2 C C (D (C a) a) >
J d d 0 O _O O L N d E.
L L O O O O L L O O Q�
LI L O O O > C C CCCI Cl 0 d _n 0 0 0 0 0 L _a O O N
d W V L L L O a) O O0 C O L L L L d A .'�" O
Y Y Y 4) E 0 a) _ O N C 0 0 0 >, c_ C
Q C-.) N ON v O L L y L 4 cs '0 "D 't7 L a) -O r`)
LL) W a) a) y) c_n Li) cn L U U t C C .L_ N CDrt CO a) _E ,r co €
J CO CO CO CO CO CO V CO N V 0 a -0 0 .— r- C,-) C o N c. O
CO Q
<( a
I— LL
I

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Outfall Number Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS FOR SELECTED POTWS
Maximum Daily Discharge Average Daily Discharge Analytical ML or MDL
Pollutant Number of Method' (include units)
Value Units Value Units Samples
1,2-diphenylhydrazine ❑ML
❑MDL
Fluoranthene ❑ML
❑MDL
Fluorene ❑ML
❑MDL
Hexachlorobenzene ❑ML
❑MDL
Hexachlorobutadiene ❑ML
❑MDL
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene ❑ML
❑MDL
Hexachloroethane ❑ML
❑MDL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ❑ML
❑MDL
Isophorone ❑ML
❑MDL
Naphthalene ❑ML
❑MDL
Nitrobenzene ❑ML
❑MDL
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ❑ML
❑MDL
N-nitrosodimethylamine ❑ML
❑MDL
N-nitrosodiphenylamine ❑ML
❑MDL
Phenanthrene ❑ML
❑MDL
Pyrene ❑ML
❑MDL
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene ❑ML
❑MDL
Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures(i.e., methods)approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR Chapter I,Subchapter N or 0.See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
EPA Form 3510-2A(Revised 3-19) Page 17

NPDES Permit Number Facility Name Outfall Number Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE D.ADDITIONAL POLLUTANTS AS REQUIRED BY NPDES PERMITTING AUTHORITY
Maximum Daily Discharge Average Daily Dischar e
Pollutant Analytical ML or MDL
(list) Value Units Value Units Number of Method1 (include units)
Samples
❑ No additional sampling is required by NPDES permitting authority.
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
❑ML
❑MDL
I Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures(i.e.,methods)approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or required
under 40 CFR chapter I,subchapter N or 0.See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
Page 18

Attachment C
Land Resource Management Soil Evaluation Report

LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Land Evaluation by Land Experts
P.O.BOX 9251,ASHEVILLE,NC 28815 I 828-900-8700 II WWW.LANORM.COM
June 19, 2024
Earnesto Sandoval
C/O Raul Souza
[e-mail]
Regarding: Report of Findings—Septic/Soils Evaluation
PIN#9684-08-1692
Buncombe County,NC
LRM Project#410323
Dear Mr. Sandoval,
In December 2023,Seth Early of Land Resource Management,PLLC(LRM) conducted a soil and
site investigation on Buncombe County PIN#9684-08-1692. The purpose of the soil and site
investigation was to determine any available options for an on-site wastewater septic system to
service an event venue/rental cabin.
Recommendations are based on,but not limited to,observations made and data collected on
topography, landscape position,parent material,underlying geology,and soil characteristics. Soil
characteristics include,but are not limited to,depth to a seasonal high-water table(SHWT),depth to a
restrictive horizon,total soil depth,soil horizonation,soil structure,soil color,clay mineralogy,bulk
density,consistence,plasticity,stone content,and percent sand,silt,clay,and mica. They follow the
guidelines set forth in the North Carolina Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal
Systems,Subchapter 18E- Wastewater Treatment and Dispersal Systems. 1
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
• LRM found the lot to be unsuitable for any subsurface on-site wastewater disposal(septic)
system. The site contains unsuitable soil conditions. Massive soil structure and shallow
Seasonal High-Water Table(SHWT)depths were observed throughout the property.
Therefore,LRM concludes that there are no subsurface septic system options available for
this parcel.
LRM appreciates the opportunity to provide this report.Please do not hesitate to call with any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely, 14--/-----/- e'Ok
Walker Ferguson,LSS t,. zs •11 �,
President,Land Resource Management,LLC =-. i
424.
, 1439
611
LRM 1
Project#410323

7Q10/30Q2 Flow Request-5 Greene Ln,Fletcher,NC 28732-Sandoval Farm
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC20240311163916999000
Clicked Point(Latitude,Longitude): 35.48372,-82.42898
Time: 2024-03-11 12:39:37-0400
, . �.
- Craig c:. c'#o ¢ d ,:a
SG F "}O
t J
�.l �
r .
=onrrN., a w CEP• � `
�7
✓�
'Q1a, .r5� a^ij Fig, -p, ,.:-
7 �odat,�
u
c
wttte a`,
s ��e �
cs
,s`m 0 o
e .fix
°A$Dr .a ' ., rf
r o k
,, p
Drainage area exceeds 0.1 square miles.This requires a formal request to USGS.This request was made 3/11/2024.
0 Collapse All
Basin Characteristics
Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 0.85 square miles
Bankfull Statistics
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [Appalachian Highlands D Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.85 square miles 0.07722 940.1535
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.85 square miles 5.459454 125.999874
Bankfull Statistics Parameters [USA Bieger 2015]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 0.85 square miles 0.07722 59927.7393
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Appalachian Highlands D Bieger 2015]
Statistic Value Unit
Bieger_D_channel_width 14.2 ft
Bieger_D_channel_depth 1.07 ft

Statistic Value Unit
Bieger_D_channel cross_sectionalarea 15.4 ft"2
Bankfull Statistics Disclaimers [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
One or more of the parameters Is outside the suggested range.Estimates were extrapolated with unknown errors.
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Blue Ridge P Bieger 2015]
Statistic Value Unit
Bieger_P_channel_width 16.8 ft
Bieger_P_channel_depth 1.05 ft
Bieger_P_channel_cross_sectional_area 18.3 ft"2
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [USA Bieger 2015]
Statistic Value Unit
Bieger_USA_channel_width 11.7 ft
Bieger_USA_channel_depth 1.16 ft
Bieger_USA_channel_cross_sectional_area 15.7 ft"2
Bankfull Statistics Flow Report [Area-Averaged]
Statistic Value Unit
Bieger_D_channel_width 14.2 ft
Bieger_D channel depth 1.07 ft
Bieger_D_channel_cross_sectional_area 15.4 ft"2
Bieger_P_channel_width 16.8 ft
Bieger_P_channel_depth 1.05 ft
Bieger_P_channel_cross_sectional_area 18.3 ft"2
Bieger_USA_channel_width 11.7 ft
Bieger_USA_channel_depth 1.16 ft
Bieger_USA_channel_cross_sectional_area 15.7 ft"2
Bankfull Statistics Citations
Bieger,Katrin;Rathjens,Hendrik;Allen,Peter M.;and Arnold,Jeffrey G.,2015,Development and Evaluation of Bankfull Hydraulic
Geometry Relationships for the Physiographic Regions of the United States,Publications from USDA-ARS/UNL Faculty,17p.
(https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1515?
utm_source=digitalcommoos.unl.edu%2Fusdaarsfacpub%2F1515&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverpages)
USGS Data Disclaimer:Unless otherwise stated,all data,metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were
collected.Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS),no warranty
expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes,nor on all computer systems,nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer:This software has been approved for release by the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS).Although the software has been subjected to rigorous review,the USGS reserves
the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review.No warranty,expressed or implied,is made by the USGS or the U.S.Government as to the functionality of
the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty.Furthermore,the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S.Government
shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer:Any use of trade,firm,or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.Government.
Application Version:4.19.4
StreamStats Services Version:1.2.22
NSS Services Version:2.2.1

Bryan Isherwood
From: Julie Davidson
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2024 9:51 PM
To: Bryan Isherwood
Subject: Fwd: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2024-320(dated 2024/03/11)
for UT Cane Creek Buncombe County...RE: [EXTERNAL] Low-flow request approval
Here is your 7Q 10 for Sandoval
Julie Davidson
Sr. GIS Analyst
Cell: 919.971.2326
Office: 919.376.6315
From:Weaver,John C <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2024 4:06 PM
To:Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kebede, Adugna <[e-mail]>; Montebello, Michael J
<[e-mail]>; Denard, Derek<[e-mail]>; Litzenberger, Kristin S
<[e-mail]>; Dowden, Doug<[e-mail]>; Albertin, Klaus P
<[e-mail]>; Weaver,John C<[e-mail]>
Subject: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request# 2024-320 (dated 2024/03/11) for UT Cane Creek
Buncombe County...RE: [EXTERNAL] Low-flow request approval
Ms. Davidson,
In response to your inquiry about the low-flow characteristics for a location on an unnamed tributary to Cane Creek
approximately 1,700 feet downstream from Upper Brush Creek Road (NC Secondary Road 3138)near Barnhill Mountain
in southeast Buncombe County,the following information is provided:
A check of the low-flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center(SAWSC, Raleigh office)does not
indicate a previous low-flow determination for the specific point of interest, identified by the lat/long coordinates
(35.48372, -82.42898) provided via email dated 03/11/2024 from the DWR USGS Low Flows portal following your
request submission.
No USGS discharge records are known to exist for the point of interest.
In the absence of site-specific discharge records sufficient for a low-flow analysis,estimates of low-flow characteristics at
ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low-flow yields(expressed as flow per square mile
drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates have been determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina
(https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest(StreamStats adjusted
coordinates 35.48371, -82.42897 NAD83) is 0.85 sqmi,which confirms the drainage area submitted as part of the
request information.
t

For streams in Buncombe County, low-flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the following
reports:
(1)The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water-Supply Paper 2403, "Low-flow
characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993). An online version of the report is available
at http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2403/report.pdf. The report provides the low-flow characteristics (based on data through
1988)via regional relations and at-site values for sites with drainage basins between 1 and 400 sqmi and not considered
or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2)The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5001,
"Low-flow characteristics and flow-duration statistics for selected USGS continuous-record streamgaging stations in
North Carolina through 2012 (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online
at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The report provides updated low-flow characteristics and flow-duration
statistics for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where a minimum of 10
climatic years discharge records were available for flow
ganalyses.
Low-flow characteristics estimated for point of interest:
For the record:There are very limited USGS streamflow records for small to very small basins in North Carolina.
Inspection of the reports indicates the presence of ten (10) nearby selected USGS partial-record sites(8)and
continuous-record streamgages (2)across southern Buncombe County and northern Henderson County in general
vicinity of the point of interest where low-flow characteristics have previously been published. Among these 10 index
sites,the low-flow discharge yields for the indicated flow statistics are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 low-flow yields==>from 0.094 to 0.67 cfsm (average about 0.31 cfsm, median about 0.26 cfsm)
Annual 30Q2 low-flow yields==>from 0.25 to 0.91 cfsm (average about 0.58 cfsm, median about 0.55 cfsm)
Winter 7Q10 low-flow yields==>from 0.15 to 1.3 cfsm (average about 0.46 cfsm, median about 0.37 cfsm)
Annual 7Q2 low-flow yields==>from 0.19 to 1.1 cfsm (average about 0.53 cfsm, median about 0.45 cfsm)
Average annual discharge yields==>from 1 to 2.5 cfsm (average about 1.4 cfsm, median about 1.3 cfsm)
Application of the above range in yields to the drainage area (0.85 sqmi)for the point of interest results in the following
estimated low-flow discharges:
Annual 7010 low-flow discharges==>from 0.08 to 0.57 cfs (average about 0.26 cfs, median about 0.22 cfs)
Annual 30Q2 low-flow discharges==>from 0.21 to 0.77 cfs(average about 0.49 cfs, median about 0.47 cfs)
Winter 7Q10 low-flow discharges==>from 0.13 to 1.1 cfs(average about 0.39 cfs, median about 0.31 cfs)
Annual 7Q2 low-flow discharges==>from 0.16 to 0.94 cfs(average about 0.45 cfs, median about 0.38 cfs)
Average annualdischarge discharges==>from 0.85 to 2.1 cfs(average about 1.2 cfs, median about 1.1 cfs)
Please note:
(1)The estimated flows are provided in units of cubic feet per second (cfs).
(2)The low-flow yields provided above are rounded to 2 significant figures. Estimated low-flow discharges less than 1
cfs are rounded to 2 significant figures. If between 1 and 100 cfs, then rounded to 1 decimal place; if greater than 100,
then rounded to the nearest whole number(zero decimal places).
(3)The information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered provisional, subject
to revision pending collection of future data and further analyses.
2

These provisional streamflow statistics are provided via the DWR USGS Low Flows cooperative agreement between
the USGS and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
Hope this information is helpful.
Thank you.
Curtis Weaver
J. Curtis Weaver, PE
Assistant Director for Data- North Carolina
USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center(GA-SC-NC)
3916 Sunset Ridge Road I Raleigh, NC 27607
Mobile: [phone]
From:Albertin, Klaus P<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 1:13 PM
To:[e-mail]
Cc:Weaver,John C<[e-mail]>; Albertin, Klaus P<[e-mail]>; Kebede, Adugna
<[e-mail]>; Montebello, Michael J <[e-mail]>; Denard, Derek
<[e-mail]>; Litzenberger, Kristin S<[e-mail]>; Dowden, Doug
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Low-flow request approval
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links,opening
attachments,or responding.
Your request has been approved and will be forwarded to USGS.A response from USGS usually takes 7 -
10 business days.
Request Flow Statistic Approval
Request ID: 320
Requestor: Sandoval Farms
Requestor e-mail:jdavidson( agriwaste.com
Requestor Phone: [phone]
3

Local Government:
Public Water Supply:
Consultant:Agriwaste Technology, Inc.
Contact:Julie Davidson
Reason: Permit
River/Stream: Cane Creek
Drainage Area (sq. mi.): 0.85
Latitude: 35.48372
Longitude: -82.42898
Other Information:
Statististics: ["7Q10","30Q21
Approved by:Albertin, Klaus P
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized
state official.
4

Attachment E
Correspondence from NCNHP

Roy Cooper,Governor
e Mil
MI"* NC DEPARTMENT OF D-Reid Wilson,Secretary
■•U■� NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
f•'-Nom Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director,Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-25331
March 18, 2024
Julie Davidson
Agriwaste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St.
Apex, NC 27502
RE: Sandoval Farm
Dear Julie Davidson:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas,and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence:the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any,are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
tannin project review, and scientific research, n p g.
and not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP,and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritagenadncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
9 121 W JONES STREET.RALEIGH.NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGI4.NC 27699
tg OFC 919.7079120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Sandoval Farm
March 18, 2024
NCNHDE-25331
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Amphibian 29361 Cryptobranchus Eastern Hellbender 2011-05-01 E 3-Medium --- Special G3T2 S3
alleganiensis Concern
alleganiensis
Bird 36627 Vermivora cyanoptera Blue-winged Warbler 1983-07-01 H 4-Low --- Significantly G5 S2B
Rare
Freshwater Fish4O888 Cottus carolinae Banded Sculpin 1979 H? 3-Medium --- Special G5 S1
Concern
Freshwater Fish5893 Erimystax insignis Blotched Chub 2014-04-10 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G4 S2
Freshwater Fish15724 Percina burtoni Blotchside Logperch 1900s X 3-Medium --- Endangered G2G3 S1
Vascular Plant 25168 Dendrolycopodium Prickly Ground-pine 1949-Pre H 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2
dendroideum Low Rare
Peripheral
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httns//ncnhde.natiireserve org/help.Data query generated on March 18,2024;source:NCNHP,Winter(January)2024.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-25331 : Sandoval,J Farm
�ioe Shmor CrpP4,
i
a�
>e
t
�
1 9
0.yr
Cc
r
' V -4.44
' `
Barn, II
Mo rain
N 3O53 ft
W-t-E ,
`�r , 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
SI I I I 1 A I , I - -''.. --
March 18,2024
J Buffered Project Boundary
n Project Boundary
Buncombe County.NC.State nt North Carolina DOT.Esrl.TomTnm,Garmm.
Sa(eGramh.GeoT inwluyies.Inc.METI NASA.USGS.EPA.NPS.US Census
Bureau.USDA.USL WS
Eau.NASA.NGA.USGS.FEMA
Page 3 of 3

Attachment F
Stream Classification

ArcGIS Web Map
cZ z
.- V
F ` Creek
F =
W
iOtt %
n
a
V .
s •
-,! . --°i
,ke yid ,'" _ 2 -
�' f
s#
=; ,-, ',�r, Surface Water Classifications: ED
Joo
9a
- J=``r . Stream Index. 6-57(9)
5
''`% j
Stream Name. Cane Creek
e) Qe v
slot.
p r -aunt'tt` - B . r;, Ma un J Description. From Ashworth Creek to French
+ t Broad River
ct �eµc Classification. C
:P Fox t::::
�,, M J Data of Cass.: March 31,1996
�I
Burney Mountain WhatdoesthisClass-mean? b'Ic,•:
r
R!ver Basin French Broad
,tee
3f2712024,3:18:04 PM 1 27.684
C C28 r55 11mi
I % t ti 1 t t %
C C 45 09 18km
tr.,DENR Dry man of Prater Resor^ea. Borcorrbe
Cant;:.NC.State:t"Jortti Carara DOT.Tennessee
STS GIS,Esr.MERE Garmm.INCREMENT P.USGS.
METI NASA EPA USDA

Attachment G
Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature

T 9 2 '��Z22� �53T9 4276
3396
♦ 5225
5357 8134
da19 � 8057
2063 mik.
3918�r 7976
7963 fik Arapp ,001101111111.."-
591? ,
1263
F*. -.', -... ...ussawadmi, if
_—n
141 7771
t 5550 8527
0425
4
le 110PP' AgllUlfllr91"a'n.'1
♦_ 1366 0353
5104
6 39 ' C IMIWile
5196
•
�1
�017 ..:- ,
`._ 4044 c�
r 920 ' 1
, _ A 6946 ,014111141111
L
J 1818=
.877 4872 ii8i;sa 444k"r
..
r
�0 062d
668 w0' . . _ „�„ ter/1A7407
• 85E0 2f467 6476 94055
f . / �� 0377 �N.\ 0973

Attachment H
Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System

Bryan Isherwood
From: Rhinehart, Heather <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 2:02 PM
To: Bryan Isherwood; Sewer Applications
Cc: PlanDevDept
Subject: RE: Sewer Availability Request
Attachments: 5 GREENE LN MAP.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Good afternoon Bryan,
MSD doesn't have any lines in the area.
I have attached a map for you to reference.
Thank you,
Heather A Rhinehart
System Coordinator II
MSD Planning&Development/Engineering Division
From: Bryan Isherwood<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, March 28, 2024 1:37 PM
To: Sewer Applications<[e-mail]>
Subject:Sewer Availability Request
Caution:This email originated from outside of MSD. Do not click on links or open attachments
unless you know the sender AND you are expecting the email. Forward to [e-mail] if
you are unsure.
Good Afternoon,
I have a sewer availability request for a property located in Buncombe County at 5 Greene Lane, Fletcher, NC
28732,
PIN:9684O81692O0OOO.
Can you please let me know the approximate distance to the nearest sewer location,as well as if there are any
plans for sewer line expansion towards the property in the next 5 years.
Thank you for your assistance,
AWI Bryan Isherwood
Assistant Project Engineer
[e-mail] I Direct:919.729.5694
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri-Waste Technology,Inc.(AWT)
501 N.Salem Street,Suite 203,Apex, NC 27502
agriwaste.com I Office:919.859.0669
1

a p 22 CQ ,�Lk
W4 !' O a,i s e 5 :e
/7----9---(! h '' a vB° 1 ' 22 4 0'
e. i o
A G
�,•° N 221V Y
N c
t o i .., ‘.3.," . 41401d t ' 1,9,, ,--14.' .;1.• tc*
1 '
.4- ' 0,
. . ,,., ,
,,, , 0 •••" .•
Linw
2220 .a R 222, ~ -
1.1 rv� % 219Q
' 'o , ,,, Ir'� 2190
r a� r f 4,
•
F ° o
° . O
go
� oE� � 0 `
ti> 1 - r1FC•ES 'To y
r
NI1i is) °. �mve.w 1
lT Ch
..ors .•sv
, i 0) 191 )
Z # --S4.. :p.i •
m
240 ry ry IQ i •
t G•• z
.`. o.- . :•fie. h'' i�l�i'C; ��a i" :.i
5 GREENE LN, 28732
1:4,000
Author:Heather Rhinehart Date: 3/28/2024
I The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, NC has prepared these maps based on best available information for use in assisting District maintenance work, service area analysis,and i
planning. The District does not warrant the accuracy of any of the information shown. Field verification is advised for all information shown on the maps or included with manhole data. No guarantee is I
given as to the accuracy or currency of any of the data. Therefore, in no event shall the District be liable for any special,indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from
loss of use, data, or profits,whether in an action of contract, negligence. or other action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the information herein provided. Grid shown is North Carolina
State Plane Coordinate System NAD 1983(North American Datum 1983).

Attachment I
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
III

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Sandoval Farms
5 Greene Lane
Fletcher, NC 28732
PIN: 968408169200000
Buncombe County
o ,a
pEESSlpy9;•4
•
SEAL
024582
)/ DODGEO \\\
¢7(z (2 2�1
Date: August 28, 2024
Design Engineer: Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
Office: 919-859-0669
Direct: 919-747-2306

Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
STEP 1. Determine if the proposed discharge will be allowed
Determination of whether the proposed wastewater discharge will be allowed. There are several potential
restrictions to a wastewater discharge to surface waters,including:
■ Zero flow stream restrictions [15A NCAC 2B.0206(d)(2)] apply to oxygen-consuming waste in
zero-flow streams. In order to determine streamflow at the P proposed osed discharge location, contact
the U.S. Geological Survey at 919-571-4000.
Response: The USGS was contacted for streamflow estimations for the tributary of Cane Creek. There is
positive flow for the 7Q10 and 30Q2 stream estimates.
• Receiving stream classification restrictions [e.g., ORW, WS, SA, NSW, and HQ class waters
have various discharge restrictions or require stricter treatment standards]. Stream
classifications are available on the the DWR Classification and Standards/Rule Review Branch
website: (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu), while wastewater discharge restrictions
for various stream classifications are presented in state regulations [15A NCAC 2B.0200].
Response: The DWR Surface Water Classification for Cane Creek is C.
• Basinwide Water Quality Plans. These basin-specific plans list NPDES permitting strategies
that may limit wastewater discharges to particular streams within the basin due to lack of stream
assimilative capacity,etc. Basin plans are available on the DWR website,or you may contact the
DWR Basinwide Planning Branch (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu).
Response: Cane Creek is within the French Broad River Basin.
• Impaired waters and TMDLs. Certain waterbodies listed as impaired on the 303(d) list and/or
subject to impending TMDLs may have wastewater discharge restrictions. The list of 303(d)
impaired waters is located on the DWR website, or you may contact the DWR Modeling and
Assessment Branch (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu).
Response: Cane Creek is an impaired water according to DWR Modeling and Assessment Branch. The
proposed system will be meeting the requirements of the impairment.
• Presence of Endangered Species. If endangered species are present in the proposed discharge
location, there may be wastewater discharge restrictions. Endangered species information may
be included in the Basinwide Water Quality Plan, or you may contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service(919-856-4520),N.C.Wildlife Resources Commission (919-733-3633), or the N.C.Natural
Heritage Program(919-733-7701).
Response: The NC Heritage Program was contacted to gather endangered species information.No species were
found on the subject property that held federal or state endangered status.No species within a 1 mile
radius of the project area held federal endangered status. While the Blotchside Logperch was listed
as endangered the NC Heritage Program indicated that the occurrence has been destroyed. Within
the one-mile radius of the property, the NC Heritage Program indicated the following Species
Federal and State Status:
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 1 of 10

- Eastern Hellbender(Amphibian)—State Status:Special Concern
- Blue-winged Warbler(Bird)—State Status:Significantly Rare
- Banded Sculpin(Freshwater Fish)—State Status:Special Concern
- Blotched Chub (Freshwater Fish')—State Status:Threatened
- Blotchside Logperch (Freshwater Fish)—State Status: Endangered
- Prickly Ground-pine (Vascular Plant)—State Status: Significantly Rare Peripheral
Non-municipal applicants.
Due to staff constraints, the NPDES Unit cannot prepare speculative limits for non-municipal applicants.
Thus,it is your responsibility to make your own determination as to whether the proposed discharge might be
allowed by the Division, by evaluating the water quality factors listed above. It is highly recommended that
you discuss the proposed discharge with the applicable DWR Regional Office and/or NPDES Unit staff,who
may be able to provide input on the likelihood of a new/expanding discharge. As a first step, you must
obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed discharge location to ensure that the receiving stream is not
subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data (specifically, drainage area, the summer and winter 7Q10,
average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in
Raleigh at 919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with the EAA, and will be used by the permit
writer to develop permit limits. You must also verify that the proposed action (i.e., construction of a
wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or subdivision
ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review Form
(Attachment A),and include the signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package.
Response: The United States Geological Survey (USGS)was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flow estimate for
the downstream tributary of the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed discharge point is a tributary
of Cane Creek. The analysis from USGS indicates the 7Q10 and 30Q2 discharge for the point in question is
positive for both flow estimates(Attachment E of application package).
All applicants.
If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the EAA
preparation by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project:
■ Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in phases, provide a
schedule for constructing each additional phase,and provide the projected flow per phase (see STEP 2).
Response: A wastewater discharge system is to be constructed for an event center located in Buncombe County, North
Carolina. The proposed system will serve a kitchen with a flow of 3,500 gallons per day combined with 10
cabins with a flow of 2,400 gallons per day for a total flow of 6,000 gallons per day. The proposed discharge
point is in a tributary of Cane Creek, located on the applicant's property. The proposed treatment system will
utilize the following components:
- 1 x 2,500 Gal Septic Tank With Effluent Filter
- 1 x 2,500 Gal Grease Tank
1 x 5,000 Gal Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
1 x 8,000 Gal Recirculation tank
3 x AdvanTex AX-20
- 2 x AdvanTex AX-100
UV Disinfection
Pump Vault
Flow Meter
Discharge Point with Rip-Rap
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 2 of 10

Construction of the proposed system will occur in two phases with an estimated completion time of two months
after the start of construction activity for each phase. Phase I involves the installation of 1 AX-20, 1 AX-100, a
2,500 gal grease tank, 5,000 gal septic tank,8,000 gal recirculation tank,pump vault,and a UV unit for the Event
Center and Kitchen. Phase 2 will consist of the installation of the collection sewer for the cabins and a 2,500 gal
septic tank that will feed into the recirculation tank. Additional treatment units for Phase 2 include the
installation of 2 AX-20 treatment pods and a second AX-100 treatment pod.
Applicant Information:
Name: Ernesto Sandoval Zaragoza
Mailing Address: 1916 Hendersonville Road
Asheville,NC 28803
Phone Number: 828-423-5463
Contact Person: Ernesto Sandoval Zaragoza
Facility Information:
Name: Sandoval Farm Event Center LLC.
Address: 5 Greene Ln
Fletcher,NC 28732
PIN: 968408169200000
County: Buncombe
Phone Number: 828-423-5463
Contact Person: Ernesto Sandoval Zaragoza
EAA Preparer's Information:
Name: Kevin Davidson, P.E.
Mailing Address: Agri-Waste Technology,Inc.
501 N.Salem Street
Apex,NC 27502
Phone Number: 919-859-0669
Contact Person: Kevin Davidson,P.E.
•
STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flo
w
Residential Population Projections.
Facilities requesting an NPDES discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges
must document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC
State Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on
the Internet at http://www.demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year population projections for specific areas are not
available, a linear extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation
from a linear projection method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future
annexations, include a proposed annexation schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be
met.
Response: The wastewater treatment system is designed for an event center with kitchen and 10 cabins. Flow for the event
center with kitchen will be limited by the number of seats while the cabins will be limited by the number of
bedrooms. For the 20-year planning period,the system will be designed for a 300 seat kitchen with a flow of 12
gallons per day per seat combined with 10 cabins with a flow of 240 gallons per day. The design flow is 6,000
gallons per day for the facility.
STEP 3. Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives
Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System.
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 3 of 10

You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a
municipality or other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non-Discharge Permit. All connection options
should include an evaluation of a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s).
1. Existing Sewerage System:
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five-mile radius,or consider a greater
radius if cost effective for the project size.
Response: Connection to a sewer collection system is not feasible for this facility. Ms. Heather Rhinehart, System
Coordinator II Metropolitan Sewerage District—Engineering Division,did not indicate that sewer is available or
any plans to extend the sewer at this time There are currently no lines in the area with the closest sewer system
located approximately 3.96 miles from the applicant's property (Attachment I). For reference, if an installation
cost of$150/ft of installed sewer line was assumed, the cost to connect this property to the sewer line would
exceed$3,136,320.Additional costs including the cost of the pump station, potential "tap"or sewer capital fees,
road repair costs,frontage fees and fees for right of way permits would also be incurred by the owner.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance from existing municipal or private
WWTPs under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept
the wastewater, include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative
technologically infeasible.
Response: N/A No sewerage available
(c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the
piping/pumps/resources necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant.
Attach a topographic map or a site drawing showing the physical route of this alternative.
Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
Response: N/A No sewerage available
2. Planned Sewerage System: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is
projected to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If
applicable, determine availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate
authority.
Response: As indicated above, a regional sewer system exists within a five mile radius of the applicant's property, but the
Metropolitan Sewerage District did not indicate any plans to extend their coverage area toward the applicant.
Alternative B. Land Application.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip
irrigation,and spray irrigation.
1. Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from
a soil evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic
loading rate and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system,including buffers.
Response:
Per the soil evaluation by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management, PLLC, the site does not have
suitable soil or space to accommodate the daily flow necessary using a ground absorption wastewater system
(Attachment D of application package).
Regardless of the fact that a subsurface ground absorption cannot be designed or permitted for this site, the
potential size of a subsurface system has been estimated. These soils would have a long-term acceptance rate
(LTAR) ranging from 0.05-0.15 gpd/sq.ft., with a typical rate of 0.1 gpd/sq.ft. Subsurface systems also require
the drainline to be installed with the contour so that each drainline is at a constant elevation. This results in a
"fanning"of the drainline and requires additional space in order to install the required amount of drainline. The
sizing calculation is summarized in the table below:
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 4 of 10

Subsurface Dripfleld Design Alternative
Daily Flow 6000 gpd
LTAR 0.1 gpd/sqft
Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 60,000 sqft =Day Flow/LTAR
Estimation for Topographical Variation 20,000 sqft
Estimated Area Required (Actual) 80,000 sqft
Approximate Area Available 157,406 sqft
The current property's land available for the system is 157,406 sqft, due to setbacks and existing site
conditions. A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A of the EAA. The land needed for a subsurface
dripfield design is a minimum of 80,000 sq. ft. Although there may be sufficient space, due to limitations
caused by the soil characteristics and conditions,this property is not suitable for a subsurface system.
The potential size of a non-discharge surface application system has also been estimated. According to the
county soil survey, the site is classified as a Worsham series soil. For a surface system in this soil, the SFR
loading rate group is likely restricted to a maximum annual loading of 19.5 in/year. The sizing calculation for
a non-discharge surface system is summarized in the table below:
Non-Discharge Surface Design Alternative
Daily Flow 6000 gpd
Surface Loading Rate 19.5 in/year
Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 180,162 sqft
Approximate Area Available 75,268 sqft
The current property's land available for a surface drip or spray system is 75,268 sqft, due to setbacks and
existing site conditions. The major limiting factors that prevent this type of system are the 100' stream setback,
the 50' property setback, and the location of future tiny homes as well as the 15' foundation setback associated
with them. A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A. The land needed for a non-discharge application
system is estimated at 180,162 sq.ft. so there is not a suitable amount of land.
2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary
land can be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices.
Alternatively,provide documentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in
the project area (include letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling
property).
Response: Because insufficient land is available onsite (due to inadequate soil) offsite land was reviewed. The table
below lists neighboring properties and the value of the land as listed by the Buncombe County GIS website.
The values listed in the table do not reflect the value of the single-family residences. While there is vacant lots
there is no guarantee they would be able to be purchased and they are likely to have the same soil restrictions
on the subject property. These sites, like the applicant's site, will be very restrictive for wastewater systems
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 5 of 10

due to the setbacks. Much of the listed southern and northern parcels are restricted for septic application by
topography.
AdjoiningProperty Values
P rtY
Area
Neighboring Property (ac) Vacant Price of Land ($)
Parcel PIN: 967498591200000 (Northwest) 10.00 Y $ 5,500.00
Parcel PIN: 967498136600000 (Southwest) 8.91 N $ 398,900.00
Parcel PIN: 967498842300000 (South) 1.36 N $ 81,200.00
Parcel PIN: 968408035300000 (South) 1.04 N $ 76,800.00
Parcel PIN: 968408510400000 (South) 2.74 N $ 70,000.00
Parcel PIN: 968408439200000 (South) 1.41 N $ 67,200.00
Parcel PIN: 968408627800000 (South) 1.64 N $ 68,700.00
Parcel PIN: 968418042500000 (Southeast) 0.90 N $ 104,500.00
Parcel PIN: 968409206300000 (North) 7.00 N $ 347,000.00
Parcel PIN: 968408779100000 (North) 0.29 N $ 50,400.00
Parcel PIN: 968408971300000 (North) 0.50 N $ 81,500.00
Parcel PIN: 968418284600000 (Northeast) 0.80 N $ 99,400.00
3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non-discharge application
system. Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing
structures,proposed structures, and other uses within the site.
Response: A typical subsurface drip system or a non-discharge surface spray or surface drip system with pretreatment
considers the following components:
-Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
-Recirculation Tank
-AdvanTex Treatment Pod(AX100 unit)
-Pump Tank
-UV Disinfection
-Headworks Box
-Control Panel
-Disposal Field(drip or spray)with addition of fill soil
Note: The proposed discharge system does not consider the pump tank,headworks box or disposal field.
Site drawings of these alternative systems showing the available application area are included as Appendix A
of the EAA. Due to the cost requirements of a drip or spray system and the lack of sufficient soil,there is no
ability to consider any of these systems on this property.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party.
Response: There is no reuse plan being considered either on-site or by a third party. It is not feasible to consider using
reclaimed water on the site or becoming a bulk distributor of reclaimed water. The table below summarizes
the amount of reclaimed water that could be beneficially used on site. As shown in Appendix A, there is
insufficient space to support a reclaimed water system.
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 6 of 10

On-site Utilization of Reclaimed Water
Daily flow through system 6000 gpd
Available Area to Irrigate 132,557 sqft •Veg.cover on property
Application Rate 0.5 in/week _ *Fescue Grass
Acceptable Volume to Irrigate 5,523 _ ft3/week
5,902 gpd
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the
potential revenue generated by selling the water.
Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis is included as Appendix B of the EAA. An analysis was performed for a
sub-surface drip system, a non-discharge surface application system, and a reclaimed water system. A
summary of the analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and
conclusions.
Response: Calculations performed to evaluate land application alternatives are shown above in Alternative B, Points 1
and 4.
7. Note: The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2T .0500 or 15A NCAC 18A.1900.
Response: The treatment systems specified above in Step B would meet the treatment standards required by these rules
as they pertain to single family residences. However, due to the restrictions listed above, no land-based
systems can be considered.
8. Note: Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systems must evaluate the potential
for an infiltration gallery treatment alternative.
Response: N/A
Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently
reusing wastewater within the confines of their WWTP property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing,
etc.,while other municipalities have established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse
applications might include golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation,
grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse
applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land Application. The design of reclaimed water
systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2U.
Response: All reuse applications for this project scale were evaluated under Alternative B,Point 4. Wastewater reuse
was determined to be infeasible for this project.
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 7of10

Alternative D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
1. No new or expanding (additional) discharge of oxygen-consuming waste will be allowed to
surface waters of North Carolina if both the summer 7Q10 and 30Q2 streamflows are estimated
to be zero,in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206(d). Private applicants must contact the USGS
in Raleigh at 919-571-4000 and obtain (generally for a nominal fee),the receiving streamflow data
(s7Q10,30Q2, annual average streamflow) at the proposed discharge location. This information
must be included in the EAA,and will be used to develop permit limits.
Response: Because this is a new treatment facility, estimated flow at the discharge point is required to be positive.
Based on the 7Q10 and 30Q2 reports provided by USGS, the flow is expected to be positive. The average
for the 7Q10 was about 0.26 cfsm and the average for the 30Q2 was about 0.49 cfsm.
2. All direct discharge systems of oxygen-consuming wastes should be evaluated both with tertiary
filtration [BOD5= 5 mg/1, NH3-N= 1 mg/1] and without, and assuming a weekly sampling
regime.
Response: Tertiary filtration is not required. Based on actual sample results from similar treatment systems (other
facilities using the same technology)in many cases,a BOD5 of 5 mg/1 and NH3-N of 1 mg/1 can be met.
3. Provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities, including a schematic
diagram of the major components and a site plan of the treatment facility with outfall line(s).
Response: Schematic drawings can be found in Attachment M(of application package).
4. Provide documentation of the availability of required land and/or easement agreements.
Response: N/A
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis for the discharge system is included in Appendix B. A summary of the
analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Note: All direct discharge treatment systems must comply with Reliability Requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0124.
Response: The system serves a private facility that is served by an onsite well and does not have elevated water storage
tanks. In the event of a power outage,water will not be available to the cabin and kitchen. There is storage
available in the system to hold some waste until power is restored to the system.
Alternative E. Combination of Alternatives.
You should evaluate the possibility of a combination of wastewater alternatives that would minimize or
eliminate a direct discharge alternative. For example, consider whether the facility can operate a land
application system during the dry season when streamflows are at their lowest and provide less dilution,and
operate an NPDES discharge system during the wet season when soils may not be as amenable to land
application and the receiving stream provides its greatest dilution.
Response: A non-discharge alternative is not feasible due to the space and soil constraints listed in Alternative B. The
presence or absence of a seasonal high water table will not relieve the other constraints.
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 8 of 10

STEP 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
PVCA Summary Table.
The EAA must include a Summary Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all
technologically feasible wastewater alternatives. The summary should include a breakdown of capital costs
and recurring costs. In some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for
some alternatives, or possibly collect actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative.
Ultimately, the final determination on cost effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of
monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
Response: The following table presents the cost analysis for several types of wastewater systems. Given the
information presented above,the only technologically feasible alternative is the Discharge System. The
"Install Cost"includes the estimated cost to design and install the specific type of system. The installation
cost does not include the cost of fill soil that would likely need be added,at the direction of a L.S.S.,to
maintain suitable soil depths within a drainfield. The"Present Value of Costs"is based on a discount factor
of 2.5%.
Cost Analysis for 6,000 GPD
20 year Annual Total Cost 20 Present Value
System Type Install Cost($) Cost($) years($) of Costs($)
Sub-Surface Drip $505,998 $43,010 $549,008 $524,568
Non Discharge $773,400 $257,680 $1,031,080 $790,948
Reclaimed $656,000 $286,033 $942,033 $676,856
Discharge $393,500 $211,338 $604,838 $408,384
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 9 of 10

Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6)allows input from local governments in the issuance
of NPDES Permits for non-municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non-municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility until it has
received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the
proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a
zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is consistent with
the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be
inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide
significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application(with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail,return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local govemment(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form,as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s),within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail,the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
• As evidence to the Commission that the local governments) failed to respond within 15 days,the applicant shall submit a
copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes[ ] No [ ] If no,please sign this form,have it notarized,and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [ ] No[
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect,is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes[ ]
No[ ]
Date Signature
(City Manager/County Manager)
State of ,County of
On this day of , ,personally appeared before me,the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he(or she)acknowledged that he(or she)executed the same and being duly sworn
by me,made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary Public)
Notary Public(Official Seal)
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April2014
Page 10 of 10

Appendix A. Site Maps
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non-Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option

UNRESTRICTED ANNT
AREAEngineer.•no Sod Sc,c6666.
(outside setbacks) �w•..r...,,._ ;
OJ
•a...91e59U669 n'D
►�♦�♦�•�♦�♦�♦.♦�♦, Sandoval Fenn Event Center
AREA = 157,406 sqft.
PROrESs .AL CNC NEER SEX.
POND
..... O' 40
.-.ti�•� I U" a [] - ���� 01 �% °� at ***•- �.• �0 I For
•-���. •
. ����i�`y .�i�i`�-��i����•�•���%_ �'0 'Q, ,��: Review
I __. r .s. ... .
,....
� ab.�i,_ � ��:11:11:-.11;11Har
® Ate, ...._ ... . • ....... ,. a"lraiTfoo Til!dr Ter J.,eiTee tr. ♦�
• . . ....'‘W Nr m,.. ,,—;
��►��� 8
1.•♦•.�'•�.�` ,_�y„. OI REEA4D rw Cd6RUCpN
P a .
Amicor-,,
az.
Ar
Ato•
___
1
SHEET TITLE
i
K.; -% Alternative Design:
F Subsurface Dripfield
I } DRAM DO CREATED OR:
B.Isherwood 07/01/2024
REVSED BY: REVSED Olt
REII D BY: REIIABEDD Olt
DRAM MAWR
SE-1

UNRESTRICTED A
AREA Bedews me b.s.Y.elleb
(outside setbacks) A.M1Wab Y.aedwr.Aa
Pr
919.850.0.9
►��AIL��•��������A SerMwel Farm Event Gaoler
Surface Derlarge
AREA = 75,268 soft.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEAL
ISii�� ® For
. # '�•i•�.. ��._.'i ` Q Review
♦••♦
4 a•
► � �...I ♦������♦ 0!�� �� Only
, tIWAwdirdwe.:11r.0!•0:agag 6==3 r=1 A , ..-C. .' P. . 4'r- V7 eye
_ ,
, _.„.i.:,,:,
LI! "SI
DE:.1
RELEAS cnalRUCrDN<j:rilli
41P
rsua na asoela
49111' Ira
w
N
SHEET DRL
Alternative Design.
illii;. Non—Discharge
y� Systems
# `— ORANM BY: PRATED Olt
�,�'�� g
DRAB-Isherwood 07/01/2024AD eI�. REN BY: REVHD OW
n RELEASED BY: REIU4D Olt
A 'MNG MAIBER
SE-2

UNRESTRICTED Alin'
AREAEtymon and Sod Solool,,,•
(outside setbacks) row•+•*•�•�.•�
OM North Caroko 27502
urface Discharge
��Ah. AL � Fenn B Caster
AREA = 132,557 sqft.
• K11111111
Pet▪IOMMIIMIO
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEAL
-...---d--
0 ©,•. — •
5 ..�., Q , •.., For
4#ii1i;i: :
�4 • 4 " •. 0 Review
•
. *��.�......•i•i•ii•‘ 4Z Only
re
w ...A.A.I Illr&N,:a..T IA"L',PA 1•Vs klIN 2 r-7-sA.--7 C.—71 E :23 d --.....ja7-• - '."--- . ::> ' '
. •-•-._.:.:.::-.-.-r,vr%% .-� •
. o_,_.-i,
NOTfbiLaO FOR COIISIRVCt10N
�_YY
All
41411P a
1,110 Ir.
Dir
SIT me
IAlternative Design:
Reclaimed Water
DRAM at CREATED OW
1� ��
> �',0 Isherwood 07/01/2024
igi WOREVISED
NAMING SAW
s DT: �Olt
SE-3

Appendix B. Present Value Cost Analysis
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non-Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option
- Surface Discharge Option

- ' O CA
< 0 c
c
-< c
CD CO OD V a) cn A c..) N -, C) CO CD V O cn A W N -+ a) N
H C9
cD
CM
CA N CA F.
w
Cn on co
1)4
w o on 3
m Co o CO
CO
O O 0) CO 0) 0) O 0) CO a) 0) CT) cn CO a) O 0) a) O COA Co
C) C) 0 CD CD 0 0 C) C) CD 0 0 CD CD CD CD C) CD C) 0
„ M=
-n _ m 1
[[�� (�(4 N N- N N N - -A- 0 D 0▪ 0- D 0- m Cn 0' < a
A A V V V Cn on Cn O C) O on U1 on O O O m ae 0 a)
O O O O O C1 O O Co co Co W W W O O O O O O o w C C)
p -n CD N
0 CD O
"' CD O
O 0
cnCD
n _w
o D) N CO
3 3
CD CO Co CO CO V V r r a) O O O O on on on cn cn on o V 7
DC
CD V CP NJ CD CO Cn W -, CO V cn c....) Ca Co cn A Cs) CACn CO (4 Co A O CO 0) A W W A Cn CO CoV Cn a? 0_
n 5 1
n O n
m w
cn
0' , w
3 3
m v n
onnOOOO 00000 CWn 00000 0000 mu, 7 0
O O O O o Ca M
a Cn
C
(0 3
c y
s <
xi
N N N o 0 L CI)
0 0 CD co co V V O O on on A A A W W N N O ET
CO- Co V on CO A Co Cs) Co W CO A CO Cn -+ V (+) CO on . w a A
CD
3
co
3
'C'' N N N N N N N N N N N N j
Wc
O CO A W W W O N CO C) O A(0 CD CO-CO -+ O 4I v CD - n
44 CO CD C) W A -4 CO O a) p V on N on j A N O a
A -+ O (n Cn (n -J CD on CD n.O A co W O O O n
C)
0
N
1
()m
CA- in in in- in W in in (n- C1 W in- C O)inCo Cn- O)- Cn Cnm
n co-4 C on C NJ O OD cn co V CO CD NJ CO CO A -, W CO
on Co cn A CO CD CO on Cn co -, N co A O O -1 O o
0
a
H
o_
c....) CAI NJ NJ NJ Ni NJ NJ 0 m _4
NJ CO V cn A W CO CO O A CO O O Cr)cn A C''') -' O 0 .
Cn O In O A O CDA (D W (n N CnO W Cn0 0 w
co V V N ()1 N Cn C) c) coCn C1 c..) 8
V L.) W V C) (q »
O -, C.../ --.1C.., 0 A Cn Cr) -, v (O CO CO ()I
m
m
01 Cn on Cn on on on on on on on on on on Cn U1 on on on Cn
co W W W Co W N N N N N N O O <
Co V on W N O CO -I CP A N O CO v O A N O CO -4 m -0
CD O In O A Co O A CO N V O N O O A in c0 N O — 2 <
co O -4 V N A N Cn Cr) CD W (n on C+) W Cn CD Cn A CO -+ on -4 co NJ W A CO on V 0) A W Cn _. (n co
n
O
N

Non-Discharge System
C„ $773,400 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
r 2.500%
1,1' = C + '
( I + r ) '
PV $971,428 Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
UV Replacement
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost Cost C, Total Ct PV
Increase 5%every 3 Increase 3%yearly Increase$50 every 5 Increase 3%yearly Annual Incurred Costs Annual Discounted Total Discounted Present Value of Costs
years years ($) Cost($) Costs($) ($)
1 60 10,400 429 0 125 11,014 10,745 10,745 784,145
2 60 10,400 442 0 129 11,031 10,499 21,244 794,644
3 60 10.400 455 0 133 11,048 10,259 31,503 804,903
4 60 10,920 469 0 137 11,585 10,496 41,999 815,399
5 60 10,920 483 300 141 11,904 10,521 52,520 825,920
6 60 10,920 497 0 145 11,622 10,022 62,542 835,942
7 60 11,466 512 0 149 12,188 10,253 72,795 846,195
8 60 11,466 528 0 154 12,207 10,019 82,814 856,214
9 60 11,466 543 0 158 12,228 9,791 92,605 866,005
10 60 12,039 560 350 163 13,172 10,290 102,895 876,295
11 60 12,039 577 0 168 12,844 9,789 112,684 886,084
12 60 12,039 594 0 173 12,866 9,567 122,251 895,651
13 60 12,641 612 0 178 13,491 9,787 132,038 905,438
14 60 12,641 630 0 184 13,515 9,565 141,602 915,002
15 60 12,641 649 400 189 13,939 9,625 151,227 924,627
16 60 13,273 668 0 195 14,196 9,563 160,790 934,190
17 60 13,273 688 0 201 14,222 9,347 170,137 943,537
18 60 13,273 709 0 207 14,249 9,136 179,273 952,673
19 60 13,937 730 0 213 14,940 9,345 188,618 962,018
20 60 13,937 752 450 219 15,418 9,409 198,028 971,428
257,680

Reclaimed System
C $656,000 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
2.500%
C
PI' = C +
1 ( 1 + r )
PV $875,097 Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
UV Replacement
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost Cost C, Total Ct PV
Increase 5%every 3 Increase 3%yearly Increase$50 every 5 Increase 3%yearly Annual Incurred Costs Annual Discounted Total Discounted Present Value of Costs
years years ($) Cost($) Costs($) ($)
1 60 7,800 3,718 0 125 11,703 11,418 11,418 667,417
2 60 7,800 3,830 0 129 11,818 11,249 22,666 678,666
3 60 7,800 3,944 0 133 11,937 11,085 33,751 689,751
4 60 8,190 4,063 0 137 12,449 11,278 45,030 701,029
5 60 8,190 4,185 300 141 12,875 11,380 56,410 712,409
6 60 8,190 4,310 0 145 12,705 10,956 67,365 723,365
7 60 8,600 4,439 0 149 13,248 11,145 78,510 734,510
8 60 8,600 4,573 0 154 13,386 10,986 89,497 745,497
9 60 8,600 4,710 0 158 13,528 10,832 100,329 756,329
10 60 9,029 4,851 350 163 14,454 11,291 111,620 767,620
11 60 9,029 4,997 0 168 14,254 10,864 122,484 778,484
12 60 9,029 5,147 0 173 14,409 10,714 133,198 789,198
13 60 9.481 5,301 0 178 15,020 10,896 144,094 800,093
14 60 9,481 5,460 0 184 15,185 10,747 154,840 810,840
15 60 9,481 5,624 400 189 15,754 10,877 165,718 821,717
16 60 9,955 5,793 0 195 16,002 10,780 176,497 832,497
17 60 9,955 5,966 0 201 16,182 10,635 187,132 843,132
18 60 9,955 6,145 0 207 16,367 10,494 197,626 853,625
19 60 10,453 6,330 0 213 17,055 10,668 208,294 864,294
20 60 10,453 6,520 450 219 17,701 10,803 219,097 875,097
286,033

0
0
`p N N- O V OD V 0 N (n OD O) M V 0) O 00 O M (n
.7 W N 00 O (0 V M 0) O N (O O N O N- O n O
> S w M O N V 0) O) - N N LU O 0 1n N t0 O V N .- N
a m O W(0 V N m LU M O) r In M O) h(n
> C) ,- N M V (0 (0 (ON- M 0) 0) O LU N M M V V V V V V V V V V V V V (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 t0 L(0
a`
v
d
• C 1` O V O V O) N U) N O) M V 0) O 07 O M l0
8 v 00 N 00 O O C M O) O N O O ,_ O (0
75 (n h O) V v (O 1- f- O O
Q C No Oj O V N 0) 1- (0 M N O 0 Q V N O N- (n M
F m U (V M V V (0 (0 1- N 0) M V (0 (D
0
H
v
m
,0 W M O) N (0 R O (0 M M M O) N )0 OD 00 N N
• '" M N M N V O M O 00) M O O) O 0 N OQ) 0L0 N OO) O
m U N 00 L co-co-OD OD co-n 00 00 1- OD 1- OD N N N 1- M
Q
0
U
v .- M N 00 M 1- (D O N
t
N (0 (0 (20QM V OM V ^O M •- 7 M N (D M OD V O O M
V w (0 O n L M n 00 O) __ _0 (0 O N 1_ OD O) __ (0 N
00 00 aD O) O) O O Q) O) 0 0 - - - .- - (N N M _
m N
CC
4.
C >,
a)
E G
a) 2itte 07 O) M 1- (0 O) V O M 00 M L V O) (0 1- M C)
d N 0 (") NNMM V ,1 V 00 (0 L N. N.
M OD O) 0 0
(0 a U d - r- .- .- . . . . . . . . . . ,- ,- N N N N
I- d 0
w
> c
co D
E
cn o o
N U >m
Oc2 T 0000 00000 (on 000000000 (on
V a co •t V
E 0 a
a aE.
co
U N m
c 0 i, _
o N n (0 L O 1- 00 m O) M M OD R7 N O M O N
y 1� t0 O O n N- m O M (D 0) N (0 O) <t 0) v O (0
N M V (0 O N O) O ,- N M to (0 1,- O) O N V 0
C M M M M (�'i(�7 cri(h V V V R R V .0 V (0 N N(N
LI) N c
O)o C
0
o d
o d
U Co O O O O O O M C) M 0 0 0 N- N N OD 00
-C C e m O O O (0 (D (D M M M N N N N N N M M M (0 (0
N N N V V a 1- 1- 1- O O O M M M O O O O) Q)
t G E ,s, (0 l0 In (n (n (n (0 (0 (n o (O (0 O (0 O O (D O (0 (0
E 1 + y d
N ° O
w a
_ a)
0)
eleln U.
0 o TO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(0 (0 f0 (O (0 O O O (O O O O O O O O O O O O
(On o t N C
m O Q
• N
E N - 0
Q)
N
>.
N
C) II
y _ N M V (0 O n a0 0) O - N M O L (0 1- 00 O) O
C }
CV
U
W >
CI U - d

Attachment J
Local Government Review Forms

AIAR"
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri-Waste Technology,Inc. July 19,2024
501 N Salem Street,Suite 203,Apex,NC 27502
agriwaste.com I 919.859.0669
Mr. Mark Biberdorf
Town Manager
Town of Fletcher
300 Old Cane Creek Rd.
Fletcher, NC 28732
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System—Sandoval Farm Event Center LLC.
5 Greene Ln, Fletcher,NC 28732
Dear Mr. Biberdorf,
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system. The proposed
system will be an Individual Discharge Permit that is permitted under the NPDES Permitting
Program. The proposed system will serve a proposed Event center located in Buncombe
County,North Carolina(nearby the Town of Fletcher).
It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the Individual Discharge
Permit is the only technologically feasible option for this property. The site has been deemed
unsuitable for ground absorption and unable to meet the required daily flow by a licensed soil
scientist.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed system.
The property is located in Buncombe County. Please note that this form is only meant to
determine zoning/jurisdiction information for the county and does not indicate your approval
of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
Scott P. Jones, P.E.
Sr. Project Engineer

Sandoval Farm Event Center LLC.
5 Greene Lane, Fletcher NC,28732
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
(General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non-municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission(EMC)may not act on an application for a new non-municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances arc to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect)whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The ENIC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Apphcanf: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility,the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application(with a written request for this form to he completed)to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail,return receipt requested.
• If either(or both)local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form,as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s),within 15 days after receivingand signing for the certified mail,the applicant may submit the application to
() � g PP y PP
the NPDES Unit.
• As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s)failed to respond within 15 days,the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s)failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to he located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must he signed and notarized.
Name of local government Town of Fletcher
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes[ ] No If no,please sign this form,have it notarized,and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes[ j No[ I
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect,is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes[ I
No[ ]
Date 1/2/2-e 2-* Signature�L%'��i% 'Z
(City Manager/County Man r)
State of \VI:N C.C.-i'G\1Ylc - ,County of C \e'V % .e.r3CD \
44A
On this 346 day of ' 3 t v ,may,personally appeared before me,the said
name i r\S \. %\ne-An r to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he(or she)acknowledged that he(or she)executed the same and being duly sworn
by me,made oath that the statements in the foregoing document arc true.
0 My Commission expires (Cl)a3 a9 .(Signature of Notary Public) (7r ..
Notary Public(Official Seal)
CHRISTINE F.THOMPSON
NOTARY PUBLIC
Henderson County
MY Commlosskon Expires
FAA Guidance Document Revision:. P
Page 9of8

AI A r •
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. July 19,2024
501 N Salem Street,Suite 203,Apex,NC 27502
agriwaste.com I 919.859.0669
Ms. Avril Pinder
County Manager
Buncombe County
200 College Street, Suite 300
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System—Sandoval Farm Event Center LLC.
5 Greene Lane, Fletcher,NC 28732
Dear Ms. Pinder,
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system. The proposed
system will be an Individual Discharge Permit that is permitted under the NPDES Permitting
Program. The proposed system will serve a proposed Event center located in Buncombe
County,North Carolina.
It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the Individual Discharge
Permit is the only technologically feasible option for this property. The site has been deemed
unsuitable for ground absorption and unable to meet the required daily flow by a licensed soil
scientist.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed system.
The property is located in Buncombe County. Please note that this form is only meant to
determine zoning/jurisdiction information for the county and does not indicate your approval
of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
1"#61-1V- —
Scott P. Jones, P.E.
Sr. Project Engineer

Sandoval Farm Event Center LLC.
5 Greene Lane,Fletcher NC, 28732
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
iienerai Statute Vvervtew: North Carolina General Statute 143-213.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non-municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission(EMC)may not act on an application for a new non-municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility,the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must.
• Submit a copy of the permit application(with a written request for this form to be completed)to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail,return receipt requested.
• If either(or both)local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form,as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s),within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail,the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
■ As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s)failed to respond within 15 days,the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form mint be signed and notarized.
Name of local government Buncombe County
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes[X] No[ I if no,please sign this form,have it notarized,and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes[X I No[ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect,is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes[X]
NoI I
Date 8/2/2024 Signature e4 (54:74'`Q' to
(City Manager/Co ty Manager)
State of ,County of
On this day of ,personally appeared before me,the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he(or she)acknowledged that he(or she)executed the same and being duly sworn
by me,made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary Public)
Notary Public (Official Seal)
EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014
Page 9 of 8

Attachment K
Topographic Map

,..„:
_, ,. ,.._
. ,
i O
Q 9
AWl T 1 -
O' Ads ���
Engineers and Soil Scientists '� ��`
Moore Lake Moore L�f;�f �r�, �0 �`
Agri-Waste Technology,Inc. '. ,/ ,f 4 �',,. - �` - IS
501 N Salem Street,Suite 203,Apes.NC 27502 1 t / ""-! `, % �.�
agnwastecom 919 859.6669 9 �� , , ♦` �,
I AK, ♦ LP
gy, ` L _ ♦♦ J
r' i/ BRUS ♦ 0
Discharge Point Location /� r n 2 Brush . e. [p
" , 0p J o`, la/ O tiNr •1 0 ; fig-
ft-
Sandoval Farm Event Center // %/ �9v 9/ �� O� xr ��
Buncombe Co.,NC /'�t �p p -' &J
PIN:968408169200000 QFv pR I' �O`/ ? O
• ? ��'N >ti / wr �
A0 /
PJt„/ r ,Z
/. _. `
''',.. 'I ''' (--
, „....... i _1 I
" I . .\\".„-•....„ i
3:_. IIIII.,i,
Z;1 .\\\C
I, -'„ r ij , , _ BRpgD1fAF pq ../..,','',. ,
po7) 1 r ' lII
,',
iGoo re
....- ._,,,,,- ,
TT-- ,
‹..,
. ..,..4
, eP 4
Discharge ; GJC` '-s
\ O Parcel '?, . 9? v
_i 1 Mile Radius /
co
!` �
! '�• yC.� e f //
N. .Z. '' t
• '0,,,-
f
or .F c_ /N.
�4 To /
`\N�` Gym Z3 t� _ / H/C�,.
♦ OJN, /
I
Creel'' ``♦� es��HENDERSON COUNT1.1..:.2.
�/ ,
♦` �J , Bamhdl Mountain
% •
`••••`` ,Y SR.-young Gop '���
Drawn By:William Snoeyink "�� ,_✓ �i
Reviewed By:Kevin Davidson '�...���� p'- �..�
Date:6/19/2024 --'."�ti, „_.�_--_--- �_
-, 0 500 1,000 2,000
•
/� Feet
'Surface water and/or bad topo areas have not been ottiaally evaluated for stream ID according to local regulatory requirements.This map is intended for preliminary purposes only and not to be used as a plat/survey or can it be assumed all streams are identified on this property.'

Attachment L
Process Flow Diagram

AWF
Cnyuwun arid Son Saenh,b
Sandoval Eann Event Center
KITCHEN/EVENT A
\ A A /A A A / \ ^ Surface Discharge
CENTER WWI CAM/ creel coact creel
2 2 . e e 7 s 9 to 0 boom LA
120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 ..,....,......
GPD ! GPD GPD GPD GPD GPD GPO GPD GPD GPD •.,r„s,,,
3,600 km.Ca*.
GPD , '...1.<;,;�
i /e.,4a>,.n
2,500
GAL
Grease ' V
Tonk 1
For
2.500
GAL Review
Grease
Tank Only
6,500
GAL
Septic
Tank
- DISCHARGE
1 POINT
am_ �a MY. DUD art asa
MD
8,000 GAL
Recirculoticn
Tank
0 0 i
0 0
X X SHEET ml'
Q Q
Flow Schematic
—i►"-i AX-20 H..--
f{AX-20 He.- DRAWN BY: CREATED ON:
B.Isherwood 04/19/1024
—ti AX-20 1--0.-- B.IshSEDerwood
, 07I/01 1
B.Isherwood REMO//2024
RELEASED BY: RE1E 0 Oµ
DRAM WINER
JCl Preliminary Drawing FS-1
� - SCALED FOR 11"X17"SHEET

Attachment M
Nearby Facilities Discharge Limits

z -o
n m
03
c
W
•
CD
0
C)
o'
H

DocuSign Envelope ID:28985B3E-61)07-463C-BC00-8033DD489E1 D
Permit N00086436
PART I.
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Grade II Biological WPCS [I5A NCAC 08G .0302]
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTIC LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter Code Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample
Average Maximum Frequency Location
Flow 50050 0.012MGD Weekly Instantaneous Influent or
Effluent
BOD,5-day(20°C) 00310 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 00530 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent
Temperature(°C) 00010 Weekly Grab Effluent
pH 00400 >6.0 and <9.0 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent
NH3 as N(mg/L) 00610 2/Month Grab Effluent
•
Total Residual Chlorine 2 50060 28 µg/L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Fecal Coliform 31616 200/ 100 ml 400/ 100 ml Weekly Grab Effluent
(geometric mean)
Fecal Coliform 31616 Monitor& Report Monthly Grab Upstream&
(geometric mean) Downstream
Footnotes:
1. The permittcc shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the NC DWR's eDMR
application system see Section A.(2)1.
2. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported<50 µg'L to be in compliance with the permit.
However,the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified
laboratory(including field certified),even if these values fall below 50 µg'L.
3. Instream sampling locations shall be approved by the Asheville Regional Office within 30 days of the permit
effective date. Monthly monitoring shall be performed for two(2)years,after which the permittee may
request to stop instream sampling per approval from the Asheville Regional Office.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:326FA523-3599-4C28-9CEA-530B943BEAF8
Permit NC0034924
Part I.
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
Grade II Biological WPCS [15A NCAC 08G .0302]
Beginning on the permit effective date and lasting until expiration, the permittee is authorized to
discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored t by the
Permittee as specified below:
LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Sample Sample
Frequency Type Location
[50050]Flow
nfluent
0.035 MGD Continuous Recorder I Effluent or
Total Residual Chlorine(TRC)2 28 µg/L 2/Week Grab Effluent
[50060]
BOD,5-day,20°C 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mglL Weekly Composite Effluent
[C0310]
Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Composite Effluent
[C0530]
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean) 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Weekly Grab Effluent
[31616]
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean) MonthlyGrab Upstream&
[31616] Downstream3
pH Not greater than 9.0 S.U.nor less than 6.0[00400] S.U. Weekly Grab Effluent
Temperature(SC)
[00010] Weekly Grab Effluent
Ammonia as Nitrogen(NH3-N) 2/Month Composite Effluent
[C0610]
Footnote:
I. The permittee shall submit discharge monitoring reports electronically using the Division's eDMR system [see A.
(2)].
2. Total Residual Chlorine compliance is required for chlorine or chlorine derivative used for disinfection. The Division
shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/I to be in compliance with the permit. However, the
Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory(including
field certified),even if these values fall below 50 ug/l.
3. Instream sampling locations shall be approved by the Asheville Regional Office. Monthly monitoring shall be
performed for two(2)years,after which the permittee may request to stop instream sampling if granted approval from
the Asheville Regional Office.
Discharge shall contain no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 6