20080111 Ver 1_401 Application_20080108

-0-~8 -:~ 1~;1~,1
SEGO
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
910.452.2711 (office) • 910.452.2899 (fax)
Date: January 11, 2008
To: Mr. Ian McMillan
Of: DWQ -Raleigh Office
Attached you will find:*
^ Proposal ^ Sketch(es)
^ JD Package ^ Report(s)
~~~~ ~ ~~;
~~
t~~Era~ - enAr~ra viliallr rn
\~JcTiAt~D~ RN`J ~7URMV`L~T. rp n*i11~,
^D Permit ^ Signed Wetland Map ^ Photo(s)
^ Plans ^ Information Request ^ Other
Copies Dated Description
x, 1/11/08 PCN and accompanying documentation for NWP- 1't; DWQ Courtesy
Copy

These are being delivered:
*If noted items are NOT attached, please contact our office.
^X For your Review/Comment X^ For your Records ^ Returned for Correction(s)
^ Corrected. and Returned ^ For your Signature ^ As Requested
^ Other:
By: ^ Hand Delivery ^X Fed-Ex ^ UPS ^ Regular Mail ^ Other
Notes:
'Ian, Please find enclosed the courtesy copy of the request to utilize NWP-,(~ for impacts associated with the i
proposed Best Western Hotel, to be located in Leland, Brunswick County, North Carolina. In addition, an !,
'.electronic copy of the request has been emailed to Joanne Steenhuis.
_._ _ ___
Signature and (Typed) Name: Dana A. Lutheran
Date: January 11, 2008
SEGi Project #: 07-050.01
(Client Name: Sankey Properties
.USAGE AID: UNCLASSIFIED
Transmittal Letter

1 1
~ou~~err~ ~,r~viror~mer~~a~ ~rou , ~nc.
53 1 5jouth Co~~e~e }load, `juite ~ Wi~min~ton, North Carolina 2841 2
9 10.452.2)1 1 ~ax: ~ 10.452.2899 o{fice@se~i.us
www.se~i.us
January 10, 2008
Hand Delivery
Ms. Kimberly Garvey
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
RE: Proposed Best Western Hotel /Restaurant
Lot 2 and 13 Towne Lake Drive at West Gate
Leland, Brunswick County
UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Ms. Garvey:
[SEGi Project #: 07-050.01]
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi) has been retained by Sankey Properties, LLC, herein
referred to as the "Applicant," to pursue Department of the Army approval to utilize NWP-18.
The Applicant proposes to permanently impact 0.08 acre (3,343 SF) of 404 jurisdictional
wetlands. The project area is comprised of two parcels, one fronting US Highway 17, and the
other, Towne Lake Drive in Leland, Towne Creek Township, Brunswick County, North
Carolina. The PIN numbers associated with this project are as follows: Tract 2 - 219606385698
and Tract 13 - 219606388580.
Tract 2 has been cleared of most upland vegetation, while Tract 13 is in its natural state. On
July 3, 2007, you verified the wetland delineation performed by SEGi. However, to my
knowledge, a USACE Action ID has not been assigned to this project. The wetland feature abuts
a run of Jackey's Creek and can be classified as bottomland hardwood forest, along the upper
edges, and swamp forest, adjacent to the creek. On 18 December 2007, Heather Coats, with the
Division of Coastal Management determined that this area of the creek did not fall into DCM
jurisdiction, as it did not meet the characteristics of a navigable water. An email with this
determination has been attached to this correspondence.
It is the Applicants' vision to establish a Best Western Hotel and attendant features on the subject
parcels. Original site plans for the hotel did not call for impacts to wetlands, but upon comments
received from the Technical Review Committee, it was determined a fire lane would be
necessary. The code of ordinances for the Town of Leland, Section 8-212, states: "For the
purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire,

sE~~
explosion, or exposure to hazardous materials, the North Carolina Fire Prevention Code and
appendices of said code, along with the North Carolina Amendments of said code are hereby
adopted by reference and are set forth herein as the Fire Code for the town..." In order to adhere
to the safety standards set forth by the Town of Leland Fire Department, the discharge of 0.08
acre of fill into 404 jurisdictional wetlands is necessary. (Note: some of the fill falls within the
FEMA 100 floodplain.)
In order to ensure no unauthorized impacts occur in areas where the proposed retaining wall falls
either within wetlands or relatively close to 404 wetlands, the Applicant has incorporated a 5'
construction buffer into the plan. The two areas in questions tota10.04 acre (1,335 SF) and will
be fully restored to thier existing state once construction has been completed. Restoration will
be carried out by replacing the excavated hydric soils and root mat. This will bring the two areas
back to existing grade and promote natural revegetation.
The requested impacts are outlined in the table below:
.Impact Number Type `Type of Feature Area (ac)
A _ f Fill Wetlands
~' 0.07
', B ~ Fill _
Wetland i 0.01
fi- - _ _ _ - -- --
1
_- ~- Temporary
_ - ~ Wetland ! 0.02
2
- -- -
- -__ Temporary
_ - ~ Wetland
-- - -- 0.02
__- ---
~ _Total Permanent Im acts 1
P ~ 0.08
Table 1: Proposed Permanent and Temporary Impacts to Waters of the U.S
The Applicant demonstrated avoidance and minimization in the original site plan, by placing all
structures and attendant features outside of the wetland line. According to the architect, at least
one parking spot is required per room at the hotel. The proposed hotel will have 100 rooms,
thus, at a minimum, 100 parking spots must be provided. In addition, the restaurant is required
to have 1 parking spot per 150 square feet of gross leasable area, thus, at a minimum, 37 parking
spaces are required for the restaurant. The Applicant has provided 119 parking spaces for the
hotel and 38 for the restaurant, bringing the total number of parking spots to 157. As is evident
in the original site plan, the parking spots were situated around the wetland complex, so as not to
cause an impact. With the incorporation of a fire lane, and the parking requirements associated
with the hotel and attendant features, wetland impacts are now inevitable. A retaining wall will
be utilized to minimize the impacts to the maximum extent possible.
Taking into consideration the minimal impact associated with this project (0.08 ac.) and the
Applicant's desire to demonstrate minimization of impacts to wetlands, compensatory mitigation
is not being offered with this permit request. According to the conditions of Nationwide Permit
#18, Section 20(c), authorized March 19, 2007, "For wetland losses of 1/10 acre or less that
require pre-construction notifications, the district engineer may determine on a case-by-case basis
that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in minimal adverse

SEGO
affects on the aquatic environment." SEGi does not feel that the impacts associated with
proposed fill will adversely affect the aquatic environment in this area.
For clarification and verification of the statements made above, please refer to the following
documentation attached to this correspondence:
Attachment 1. Pre-Construction Notification
Attachment 2. Overall Impact Map
Attachment 3. Cross Sections and Zooms of Impact Areas
Attachment 4. Wetland Boundary Survey (unsigned by the Corps)
Attachment 5. Vicinity Maps (2 scales)
Attachment 6. Aerial Photograph
Attachment 7. Property Owner Tax Information
Attachment 8. Email from Heather Coats -DCM (pertaining to not DCM jurisdiction)
Attachment 9. Email from Chief of Fire and Emergency Services (pertaining to fire lane)
Attachment 10. Preliminary Site Plan Requiring No Wetland Impacts
Attachment 11. Letter of Agency
At this time, SEGi is requesting the review and processing of the attached permit application for
authorization to utilize the NWP-18 for the proposed activity. Should you have any questions,
concerns, or comments, feel free to contact me at 910.452.2711. Thank you in advance for your
assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
~ --~~~~~~~1~
G_=
Dana Lutheran
Project Manager
cc: Michael R. McLeod, Architect, PA
Joanne Steenhuis -DWQ Wilmington (electronic)
Ian McMillan -DWQ Raleigh
Enclosures (11)

A-I-(aeh~nenf ~ - ~c~
0 8 -0 1 1 1
Office Use Ong:
--- _ __ -
~ USACE Action ID No.
Revised Version December '06
DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
© Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP :I f~
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ~
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information: Sankey Properties, LLC ~ ~ ~ C ` ~ ; ~ '~~ ~
Name: Riley Evans ~,..a~._.~ 3 s ~~;
,~
Mailing Address: PO Box 847 ~,q~; ~ ~ ?~~~
Clarkton, NC 28433
Telephone Number: 910.270.9778 Fax Number: NA r~~r~~ ~'" `'' `~'
E-mail Address: NA t~criA~~os.a~:n sr s~,~~~Tts ~1~.i~r;h
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Dana Lutheran
Company Affiliation: Southern Environmental Groug, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5315 S. College Rd. Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
Telephone Number: 910.452.2711 Fax Number: 910.452.2899
E-mail Address: dlutheran(a~,Segl.us
Page l of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings
rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a
small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project
has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1, Name of project: West Gate Best Western
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Tract 2 - 219606385698 and Tract 13 -
219606388580.
4. Location
County: Brunswick Nearest Town: Leland
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take US 17 South to West
Gate Drive, on left, and then right onto Towne Lake Drive. The site is located at the
terminus and left of Town Lake.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): Latitude: 34.2090 °N Longitude: 78.0293 °W
6. Property size (acres): .3.57 ac (155,600 square feet
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Jacke_ye's Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application:
There are no structures located on the subject property. Towne Lake Drive dead ends on
the eastern side of Lot 2 and is the northern boundary for most of Lot 13. There are no
other paved or dirt roads located on either site. A water line has been installed between
the two lots and service covers are located approximately 40 feet west of the terminus of
Page 2 of 10

Towne Lake Drive. There are no other improvements on site. Most of the site is located
on a high ridge to the north of Jackeye's Creek. The south and western sides of the
propertygrade stee~iy to the flat, wetland floo~lain of the Creek. The proper ~ is
located in an emerging commercial and residential area.
Wetlands cover 0.44 acre (19,166.4 square feet) of the subject parcel and can be classified
as PEM-1. The jurisdictiona1404 wetlands are vegetated with a canopy of: Liyuidambar
styraciflua (sweetgum), Acer rubrum (red maple), Persea borbonia (red bay~Quercus
micliauxii (swamp chestnut oak), and Ilex Baca American holly). The shrub laL
includes: Mvrica cerifera (southern wax myrtle). The vine laver is composed of: Vitis
spp. (grape species), Smilax bona-nox (saw greenbriar), Gelsemium sempervirens ( ely low
'asmine .
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Applicant wishes to construct a Best Western hotel and attendant features on the
2.68 acre site. Utility corridors, sewer areas, fire hydrants and roadways will be put
into service to meet the requirements set forth by Brunswick County and Town of
Leland Planning Departments. Heav~quipment will be used in this ,project, such as
back-hoe and bull-dozer. The machinery will be used to clear the land, stabilize the
soil, install infrastructure and establish grade.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Originall ,the project did not pro ose impacts to wetlands. However, due to fire
safe requirements set forth by the Town of Leland Fire Marshal, 0.08 acre of 404
jurisdictional wetlands will need to be filled to support the required 20' fire lane (see
attached email re uq esting the addition of a 20' fire lane and proposed preliminary site
plans proposing no wetland impacts.)
During the construction phase of the bulkhead, the potential to temporarily impact
wetlands exists. Therefore, the Applicant has incorporated a 5' construction buffer into
the plan. The two areas in questions tota10.04 acre (1,335 SF) and will be fully restored
to their existing state once construction has been completed.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
On July 3, 2007, Kim Garve~(USACE) verified the delineation performed by SEGi.
However, at this time, a USACE Action ID has not been ass~ned to this project.
Page 3 of 10

State stormwater permit SW8# 990807 was ass~ned to Tract 2.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future project plans, nor any future federal permits, anticipated for this
rp oject•
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Two areas, totaling 0.08 acre, of permanent wetland impact are proposed, and are
necessary for the incorporation of a fire lane for the proposed hotel. 0.04 ac. of
temporary impacts are proposed, and are associated with the installation of
necessary retaining wall, which aids in minimizing impacts to wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For
dams. separately list impacts due to berth structure and fl~~ding_
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain (yes/
no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
A Fill PEM-1 No 500 0.07
B Fill PEM-1 No 400 0.01
1 Temporary PEM-1 No 500 0.02
2 Temporary PEM-1 No 400 0.02
Total Permanent Wetland Impact (Acres) 0.08
Total Temporary Wetland Impact (Acres) 0.04
Page 4 of 10

3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland acreage totals: 0.44 acre (19,166.4 square feet
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement
walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream
relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the
original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X
width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
(~ p)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act
p Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not
limited to fill, excavation, dred~ine, flooding. drainaee. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water
Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact

(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Im act (acres): N/A
Wetland Itrt act (acres): 0.08
O en Water Im act (acres): N/A
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.08
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): N/A
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ^D No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation: Yes
Page 5 of 10

If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): D uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirement
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The original site plan did not call for any impacts to jurisdictional features. It was only
until comments were received from the Town of Leland fire department, requesting the
Applicant incorporate a fire lane into their design plan, that the impacts were determined
to be necessary.
The fire lane must be incorporated in this location, as the hotel will be required to have at
least a single parking snot per hotel room. In the original site plan, the Auplicant took
every precaution to avoid impacting wetlands for the purpose of parking. Thus, the
majority of buildable uplands were already allocated to adhere to other Town
requirements. The only feasible location for the fire lane is to the east of the proposed
structure.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and. practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/
Page 6 of 10

or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
In accordance with General Condition #20, compensatory mitigation is not offered for
this project, as the anticipated permanent impacts are less than the mitigation threshold
requirement.
In areas where temporary impacts may occur, the Applicant proposes to replace
excavated hydric soils and root mat to bring it back to existing grade. Its of SEGi's
professional opinion that replacing the original rootmat will allow natural revegetation
will occur. Monitoring of the area will ensue over a period of 2 pears to ensure success
of the restoration. Should revegetation not occur, a wetland seed mix will be applied.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: N/A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):_
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):_
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):_
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):_
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (arres):_
Page7of10

I. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ^ No ^D
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^
IX. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ^ No ~ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
- _ _ __ _ r --- - --___ __ p
* Impact ~ ~ Required ~
Zone Multi Tier
(square feet) Mitigation J
1 3
2 ~ _ 1.5
--- _ -- --
--- -
- - _ __ 1
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Page 8 of 10

X.
XI.
II.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide
calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level
Stormwater will be managed via an on-site stormwater facilities. Originally, Tract 2 was
permitted to consist of 85% impervious surface area (ISA). To my knowledge, the
Applicant intends to utilize the existing stormwater permit and design an additional
stormwater treatment plan to manage the remaining ISA proposed for Tract 13.
Entire Proiect:
Existing ISA : 0.0 SF
Total Acreage: 155,655.0 SF
Proposed ISA: 98,809.0 SF
Percent ISA: 63%
Original Tract 2 Permitted:
Existing ISA: 0.0 SF
Total Acreage: 57,804 SF
Proposed ISA: 49,134 SF (85%)
Total ISA: 98,809 SF
Tract 2 ISA Permitted: 49,134 SF
Tract 13 ISA Proposed: 49,675 SF
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available .capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sewer and water will be utilized. No discharge of wastewater will be generated
from the proposed project.
Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No ~
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes O No ^D
Page 9 of 10

XI1. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No D
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is an independent development, not associated with any other development
Implementation of an approved sedimentation and erosion control and stormwater
mechanisms will control potential impacts to adjacent and downstream jurisdictional
features.
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose
to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work
schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature d Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

08-0111
NOTES
THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN EVALUATED
6Y HEATHER COATS WITH THE NC DIVISION '
OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT AND WILL NOT
REQUIRE A CAMA PERMIT,
88,808 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS
155,587 SF TOTAL SITE
63,5% IMPERVIOUS
%j
LL` '.R2TAINING.~e.r~.. ~v
~: ; ~,~:aNALL._ ~ .. ~.'_'_~'.
_~~~~~ I
..,
t. .~.".`.'.".'.'.',','.",',`,",',`.`,',',',',',~
......................
KEY PLAN ....,.. ~,~~.~.~~:~,,:
,~;-~~~ti
A . , Lam'
F~~ ~ ~ J 1, Uo V
.~~,~~r
Z

H
m ~
o J
z ~d
U ~
~
~
W
~

(~ Z
w~
W 3~ W
3 0~ Z

O

W
~ m
v
/~
W N
U~
U Z
~ °
aN
E N o
~N~
U a

A/ ~~ I
^ t a lL
`x
~.G~ ro w eo
°m ~ rn
~

W H

x _
~ga
~ N
~ 0 O
W
~ U ~
A'
W d c
~L
as
~ U ~
N

r~
C
scrv.E r =,~~
~,
0 5 10 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 100'
~„ lkAh>l y r
tinIFTI ~~`~`',

Y
01-10-08

~E~
PROPOSED TEMP IMPACT AREA 1
0,02 ACRE 1670 SFI
PROPOSED PERM IMPACT AREA A
0,07 ACRE 12960 SFI
22
20
18
16 N
14 ~
f
11
~~W
8
PANTR
w b1 y _v. ~_ y w w w~ y v, _
1~r~~~~ ~'i{ C~~e~,,,,
W
a
s,a
- 32.0
~~
J
i ~ ~ EXISTING
Q ~ GRADE PROFILE
A GRADE PROFILE
~ 2 SCALE 9r'32' = f-0'
grad e
ENLARGED PLAN
1 AT IMPACT AREA A
NORTH 2 ~E } _ ~~
"'',~
0 1 30
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=30'
TAINING WALL
O
22
20 Y
J
i8 m r ~ 'vo.
16 ~ F _ _
14 ~ ~ Z _
t2 z
~ W ~ y J ~, = ~_ z _
- _ ~ EXISTING
GRADE PROFILE
10___-
~ ~= =-~ Q ~ Q
J
8 f ~ W
f
O
a
~ ~ ~
~
a B GRADE PROFILE
- s,o~ - ]o,o~ 2 scALE ~ = t~
~U
A ~°~
~ ~z
~ Zo
'a. w 3~
L1 3 ° ~
5
i

/' i `
5~~~7~d;4J ~~`
FT ~~ "`
1 f
~'9i~0 RETAJNING WALL '~ ~~N 1 ~ ~~~~
6
~G
~ ~ C7Ef~ft•~1A7 RMP'~t~"'<~`t
0
gyp} , ~~5 qND 5Y0,
PROPOSED PERM IMPACT AREA B 2
0
0,01 ACRE 1383 SFI / yo 0
PROPOSED TEMP IMPACT AREA 2 ~~
0,02 ACRE 1665 SFI
ENLARGED PLAN
2 AT IMPACT AREA B
NORTH 2 ~~ T = ~~
J
~
_

~/ ~
{ cn
~,

rn
W ~
m ~
TAINING WALL ~
~d
~
1~~1
O
~~
u.
Q ~
WW
g~
w~
W
O
2
z
W
~ a ~~
Um

U Z
aN
E H ~
U ~arn
• L Q LL
_/
(
Y, ~ 2
m LLj W
^ ~ A
3 > N
O
~ U Q
W~
~d
a c
L
Qa
U
M
u
^
5
1`--'1
01-10-08 12

WETLAND SURVEY
WEST GATE
TRACT 1,2 & 13
TOWN CREEK iDWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
TOWN DF IELAND
DEVELOPED BC ARBORGATE PROPERTIES LLC
P. D. BOX ]167
WiLMINGiDN, N.C. 18406
/ PHONE d (910f J91-II96 A
DATE: MAY 1I, ?007 `~
eee~~~°°~~~
V ~ LSXO ~
TRACT 2
]DAN uulTS a LfIAND
71951 so. n
167 ACRES
A8 le A9 19 i1p ~ ,
7 A10 A11
I A11
A7
'
~ru~ ~.
78.56' A!J
N ee'ssle' w
R
z
J.
A14
r
~`^I
A15
~4
,
~
y
°fq Q,

NN1111
1
,
1
.,~
lly S~k
f,
p
~
'
y
,

t
p
~ ~;
~ ~
~
.
Y
1
`~I~eee
' UMCRON IRACi
~ I11
,
d.// i ~
l~°
~L'l M.B. 17 PC. 187
~'L~1 ~
N07f$
1. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD
2. ALL aS7ANCES ARE HORIZONTAL
J. fOR REFERENCE SEf M.C. 16 PG J42
4, SURVEYED : MAY il, 1007
5. 4.57 ACRES i01A1 AREA
6, THIS PROPCRtt IS NOT LOCA TED W11HIN 1000' pF 'J2
EXISTING N.C. GRID MONUMENT
LCCEND
EJ,P EXISTING WON PIPE
E.I. = ExISDNC IRON
E.C.M. EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
R\W = RIGHT Of WAY
C.P. COMPUTED POINT
• = METLAHO iLAG
SIGN ~
°R<"""" ' ~ LOCATION MAP
Dnun
EASENENI. - Nor ra sLUf
SD,O'
uwTr ~
EASEMENT
~ `dl o
~[ ~~
y y 1~,
~,.
~d't n
:\$
q, r. f GN NAII II u.e. NW. H-76 °t`yy~7
J ?. 31 \ ~ C 7
- _ 1 - G m p
. o. \ ° P ,x5,p 1531 ; to
SIGN AuD f ~ - ~ us N^. It =
EAS[MfN \ pM[ 1~ 0N<~KUN7~ ~ J
7 ~ ~ w
TRACT 1
43e06 50 n
I.OD ACRES
~:
f os
~~
\ 51 4
i OPT
NAR kk R
a~,~ a1~
M1~ ~', ~
!' ~/ k'e \
! M V,
O~ ~ o,- C
~ ~ \
' o~ i \ \ V.X. NAN / ~ PHASE 1 $ELnCN 1
Y r !~ ^ tb ~,. PON71N S \8.88. ~ MC. J1 PO 519
o an a ae aELw k'DesJ aa,rNai \
f P.X. NAA ~
!~ ~C~ ~~~3 I~ rv
i• 9 / ~ \ \ ~
h~ ~ wFS~
t ~ ~ ~ ., ;.
i ~0 \
CM1 / I `~ ~ wESE WiE
W PHASE 1 SECnON I
`~ .~~~ 15°'_~f~ ~ RETENTION POND TRACT R~~F
L, P' `P , ~
AV ~
w Gi R
Lt
`
~ I
AJ1i ~~ LS
/
O~ I~,
A31
~
,

TRACT 13 AJO z
~ 5
e26)) so n
1.90 ALRFS
N '• AI)
\4 L
A16
~y ~ Q
`Vile?~s ,;e
ro•
~ A19
JS '•. 5 e5'4T4i' w 186!
OJ A10 IPD ,111
` TOWN IIMIT$ Of LELAND
DAS CERixlFS 1HAi M15 PLAT ACCtMA IELY DEMCTS DIE Ba1NDARY ;!
I DIE A1R15'aCDCA' OE SFCDC.N 104 CF THE CLEAN wA7ER ACi PURSUA1f1 EO
THE 79L7 CORPS 0<ENGNYEPS DELIkAl1aN MANUAL A$ OErERYlNEO RY
UIC UNDER51a9(0 av DNS DAtf aAf55 EVER[ I$ A CNANOf RL 1NE IAw
OR WR PUBLISHED R[CUU EIONS 1H15 D(1ERNWAnON MAY BE R[L1fD
WON FOR A PCRIOD a nM" KARS FROM MIS DATE, SOLAEED MR wD5
OR WA7ER5 MAE ARf a/i 0( 017RP5 A/RISaCMAV HAVE BEEN LABELED
a7 M SURKY
SIW/ANRf U.S. ARMY CORPS OF fNaNCERS O7H.7AL WILE DAEE
FXPWAnav DAf a OELINCADa1 _
USACf AClia+q; _.
A1J A78
I
<< <,~
<11
•
A11 b <IJ
~^ ~ I
J•
~70. ~J`= AIS
9RAelA9E rsvr.
1.81 ACRES [filANO LWE
JaJj\ AI6 5 M I
th6J ~
55 I
1
I
I
I
I
L-
/ / i
5O' 25' O ~ 50'
--
/ .4Fw .
1~"yl
I I;NF BEFMNG ~i<16"iCF L19 ' N 15'a7T w i
1 1,~1 5 JO7Y<E' f 2560' LJO N OE 17J' f
II U~l ~ 5 J071'1E' E 15.LO' , LJI w 01^, l9 C
qE 131 N 8S'a a2' E
TIE tJ5 S 56'1159 E
I .JFeE. TRNUV ANG ~ ,:rORO L. CHpItD BEARrvG lI
i LI tLn 10.79 1C 75'
- S 60'0206 N
C2 85 L ', I •,.1 rtt:2_JY` N 46']5 e7 E
CJ 35 D[ 1<,,.fi?' wa n8'
- S46'JB 3f k
_
G _
425 C0' I'<LPa ITSP' N 38'24'56 w
37500' ; 12; 7B' IN.11' , N 357]'43' w
Cfi ! ]75.00' ~ 110.<9' 710.09' , 5 577T0T E
C7 I JI0.00' I I)4.+5 IJ)AO'
~- S A~)6'16 w
CS 125.00 24.78 ' 7x.17 N~ 55'0'04 w.
HANOVER DESIGN SERVICES, P,A.
LAND SURVEYORS ENGINCfRS LAND PLANNCRS
ti1J FLORAL PARKWAY
MLMING70N, N.C. 1840]
PHONE: (910) J4J-8002
fAX; (910) NJ-9941
weslgRle/6]09 we04nJ 1007 p (((JJJ•••JJJ

L
~
~1 M
V
w~

~v
~ ~
C rf,,T, Y'°9 P~ /
IFno ITS( ~ V
~~
JA.~ ~ r °`
nkr~n.1,~; I,
IDS ANJ 41 ~ it9.- . ,.' ``:ter

ti_

~ ~~~
~v:
~ ~ ?QOII

L
++
.~.
~~~~ ~
f~
a

v M
;t. ~.
~.

~~
~~~'
A~-I-a~hm,sn~ S ~ a o~ a.
~~
~~
~~~~
~~~~
~,
~'1
~~~

~'~~ ~~
t~~~
"~
~~,~'~~
~~;.;.
~~
S''~ ~
~ ~°,~
~~
;,, ~~ ~
k~
a?
~~,
r~~
4./
~~
~.
~'
~~~~ ~~;
.i/~fv ~ 4 7008
)~I~4t • { ~g ~.a•
l°.~Ti.As~ 1:S aNt~. ,1 '~"tsi`a^!µT rE ~';•_1~ r;r;
-'i4-

7
fJ
P
7
G'
r-
n
r,
r-
r° 3.F
(J ~ g~ rt

, °~

¢~~,#-~
~.;
~~
`~
~ :y
',
'
~.,
~" ~~~ ~
~ ` .w~
~`gF
N

~'
•
~
S~ ~_ ~~ -~

~ y ~:
~.
.~
z ,~ _
~~
^.
,
~
~ '
aed ~~
~ %
`
~3 ~
~ d 4
Y`~
~
~ ~
~

kY
r~.,,
~~

n

Print Preview ~.~'~~ ~'~ ~+ ~ Page 1
I r~ n -=; ~ - ~}-
Tract 2 Towne Lake Drive T'Q~C Srt-~

Parcel Number 1 0470002406
~ _
~ Plat Date
~~
Account Number _ _ _
203 26550 Land Value
~` $504,000 _
____ ~P ~
PIN C 2~
Owner
Owner Address 1 ~ ~
219606385698 °I- 21 Q ~~~a gg_b`~C7.~ _~_
SANKEY PROPERTIES LLC
j Building Value
~__ _
~ Other Value
Deferred Value $0
4___~_______
$0
$0
Owner Address 2
f PPO~BOX 847
~ Total Taxable Value $504,000 ___
_
City ___...____
CLARKTON .
Heated Sq Ft
--

!
State - -_ ...

N
C ,

Year Built
Zip
Legal Description
_______~_~ ___..__--..--
Parcel Street Number 28433
~L-2 1.68AC S-1 PH 1 WEST GATE PL 26/342
I--- - Bedrooms
Ful Baths

Stories
Parcel Street 1 Ext. Wall 1
Street Type " '~ ~ ~ E Wall 2 _
Street Dir Ne-ghborhood 2001
Subdivision
----- -- _
Deed Book ~
Deed Page ~ WEST GATE

2585
0100 Municipality

!Fire Tax Distract
i Township _ LELAND

LELAND

!~___ _
TOWN CREEK
Deed Date ~ 4/4/2007 j Acreage 1.679999
--- ~- r
~...,,.,~,.,, ,~At/nrintPraviP~a~ acrix9Prinr(lntnat~=Tract 2 Towne Lake DrivelOlOltruel... 1/10/2008

Yahoo! Mail - [e-mail] ~ ~G~ ~~L
----- Original Message -----
From: Heather Coats
To: mrmcleod(c~bellsouth.net
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: Jackey's Creek determination
Hello Charles,

~~i
Page 1 of 1
As discussed Tuesday, my site visit to the property adjacent to Jackey's Creek, located immediately south of
NC Hwy 17, revealed that Jackey's Creek is not navigable to this point, and therefore the proposed upland
development on this particular tract is not within our jurisdiction and would not require a CAMA permit. Please
be aware that permits may be required by other state and federal agencies, including, but not limited to, the
NC Division of Water Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Land Resources.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or if I can be of further assistance. I hope you have happy
holidays.
Sincerely,
Heather Coats
Field Representative
NC Division of Coastal. Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone] Fax [phone]
Toll free: 1-888-912-CAMA
httr,•/MS ma;t vah~~.cam/vm/se~i.us/ShowLetter?Ms~Id=6835 13761634 4816 1668 20... 1/10/2008

Yahoo! Mail - [e-mail] Page 1 of 2
~~-~~~m~~- q
Uohn ~r~ mes ~nar-• J
From: John Grimes
To: 'Mike McLeod'
Cc: 'Ronnie Haves' ; chunt(g~ec.rr.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:46 PM
Subject: RE: WEST GATE BEST WESTERN HOTEL
Mike;
I understand that the elevations are different in the rear of the building. What is the Height at the five
story section relative to the fire apparatus road in the rear? I have also attached a copy of the fire
code for the road. Will the roads be gated? If so gates have to be siren activated. They can be open
for public travel but must be posted as "NO PARKING" "FIRE LANE". If it is one way it must be
posted that way, etc.,etc.,etc.
SECTION D105
AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
D105.1 Where required. Buildings or portions of buildings or
facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the lowest
level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided
with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating
fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility
and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus
access roadway.
D105.2 Width. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum
unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm) in the immediate
vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30
feet (9144 mm) in height.
D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required
access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a
minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel
httn~//h5 mail vahnn rnm/vm/ceui nc/4hnwi,etter?Ms~Id=9671 0 2097 1596 653917 0 ... 1/10/2008

Yahoo! Mail - [e-mail] ~~~~1~t~ ~ g Page 2 of 2
to one entire side of the building,
John Grimes
Chief of Fire and Emergency Services
Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Department, Inc.
PO Box 176
1004 Village Road
Leland, NC 28451-1076
910-371-2727 Station
910-371-1838 Fax
[e-mail]
www.lelandfirerescue.com
~...r.in.c .,.,,;i ,.,,i.nn ,.n,,,/.,,,,/OPlt; nc/ChnwT P~*PY71\~CQT/7=Qfl / ~ ~ x(197 1 SqF h5~917 0 1/1O/~(lOR

~ , ~ / Reneiori xv oAre
1 bRAmARd I
Wµe /
~'*' I
IRM I
I1 I
11 ',', I J
,, r
J5 ~~ \ \ 1 ~r = ~
\ , ~i II \ t
~ \
\ ~' \\
__ \ \ ~~ Z
.. \
` 03. /--- ~ \ \ 1111 `\\ ~
,~;~~ ,> ~
WE GAT ~~ \ ~, I~ w
N_ ~
'~ cn
~~ ~ ~I~I
~I \~~ ~
J
' m W
w,
,/ r/)'\j \~• X11= ~ ~O O''
/ / / ` TRACT 1 i // ~ It. ~: ~ Q m
1 ~ / ~\ ~
// t /ED ~ \\ \ ,m,aa ri / 1,~ \\\\ \ YU
\ ~gZ
// CT \ ~ ~ I ~ I~ ~ Ali \\~~ ~ II/\ \~ W zz w
/ 7m,7esri n. \ ~ A 2~ 11 t~\ \ \ ~~
/ / \ \'6 I .P~ / / I ~ ~ nwu S 6 \\ ~ F J
/ ~ ~ ~ PORTE ~\ ~ i ~ / \ G ~~
COCHER \ ~ / ~ I ~ ~``''~qT~`
~dt / / ~~ POOL 1 STORT L066T \ ~* \ /~~ / ~ ~ I" I ~ \
/ ~ / ~ ~iPORT10N OF ~ \ i / ~ I~ I I• ~ ~ ~ \
Aa
~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / / ,r ° x4eAa rtoWeq roR+xrue '~ ~1 )~ b \ \ ~ ' ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ / / ` I '~ ~ ~/I1~ ~ _
<a ~ \ Wk /LAMB W Z
xeeR7R i / a 1 v
~A ~ ~ ~- - as ~ _ _ V i
\ h, ~ Ae ~ ewlDRk RlTxa! A eTDR77'1 b \ / ~/ I I V ~ ~ N
~aabb~ ` ~ `~ /- - » en~e'u•: - An 100 ROOM (," / - - - - - - - ~ ~ a „
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ HOTEL b ~\V c ~~ ~ --- ~+m
\ ~~ ~ + I ~U~=m
~ I a n ALWlI w~ w m
\~~ I \ 0 /Q _y ~ ~ Dn
.\ \ ~ gESTAURANT R, P ~1 I i `H g d
- ~_ _ _ ~ 1n 0 /PARKING a I he [j^] S a
_ - ~ _ ,~\ ~ ~` 5 STORY I I r ~.+t w'ia ~ u ti~ I I~ I ^ ~ ~ ~ m
- - ~ 'i ~ \ \ TOWER e I ~ -
rowx lxure or lnAxo ~ A1R ~\ ASS' HEIGHTS !` I ~ kl "" I II ~ ~ ~
~ Yi 4 ~ ~ Ig IJ ~R ' <
I eeaexrxw 7roxo i a
V ~• ~~~ ~ \ \~ ~~~ ~ SI C RESTAURANT ~ Sl
'}, I I I
'b ~I q ~ I I
\ \ " \ ~ I I I e+ f V~ ' 118
\ s ~\ TEL II . ~/
6\f ~ V PARKING ~ I I
~ An \ ncltae lT4 \ ISED Iu I.
\ TRACT I
~ I \ ~ \\ ~ ,or pa III r///
\ ~~ \ " I I
tAE616.~t01®YClRl \~ *, \ ~r \ ~ I I I r
None ~aTe7: i 7Waa RR auteTROOU WN \ `~ \ I I
70o RODI/ • tD0 wun ReowMO \ • ~~ ~ ~ PROPOSED AR r
4 ARlA cowwrlD eT caWa,un werHOO \ 1NB R[4Rt~1~ k w •
M NA2R RROYwlD ~. a ewe euu "wt*u'+t RETENTION ' r
a. All DI87ANDl6 ARe MO7nSpRA1 a ~ ~ POND I I I3
RuTAUtA1R: ~ ePAR R!A 470 dr ar •• _. ~ ~~ L I
a. roR u~lRewrx ue r.c. Re K. R+a eROU tiARAett ARlA WN 'dy. ewe !ww m~~- w. ~ u~ ~Id
x. NARY[T!D : IIAT ry a007 „1, Nil tl0 WDARb RlDUI7lD \\ to s~ - ~~ ~ I I ~~-~ Z
!. /.07 ACI7lD TOTAL ARlA ~' ~ Ln tla ` ~ ~ ( I
/_
~~ ~, ~ g
t. TXI6 /ROP7!RTr p RpT lOG7[D WITI7N a000' Of AN ~ ,]G taG a7 +r I I
exunrwP xc. ovo wvwrerrt ~ `4a\~.,< ~/ / I r a
SITE PLAN °R b~~~, RY% ; ', W
SD1 SCNE:fi9U~Y\'d~ A:,d~ I r I-
\ \ v, I
1 ~ ~ ,,Rr I ~ U)
/rorn7 tnm a uwo \ ,U ~" I I
Y I I'
\ is° I S'~
\ ~/ IIZ '~,~ ~ SD2
o \
g
pL
N~
C
t„
na
1'*~
`^I,

cuu,-,c-uo nao IorncoreyEVans 91[1-64e-4407» 9104522699
~tt~~ n l ~~" ~~
SEGO
,~out~~rn ~nvironmenta~ ~jr~u , ~nc.•
~nvir•pr~mrnta~, ~cve~n~?ment, aria ~,c~nservativn ~c~visUrS
Www.s~~~.Us
elter of e_~
1,

herc6y grant
P U1
,`~outhcrn ~nvironmcnta~ ~jrC~r~~, ,nc.., ~~F ~ji} t~c ri~ht to
--~~-~in mat rrs rc~.~r, rrlt~cnvirC~nrtlcntat
(C ~ t.,r)
Ct7n$~lltlnJ fiCNI~('.$ Un rf.:l~ ~rv~+Crty c~wncd ~y ~ ~ l
~~
II , 7, / i
~..._~-.. _._ in f-~''C?/1t-.,._~ __.~_...~
'~ ~~c~rru~ ~{ ,ity~
---~ ~'~! _,~~ ~ountli, Nnr•t~l (,_arp~ina.
// 'l'/y
j „9nc~ C7w r/~pcnt
~~~z__
Da<<
3 ~ f 7 ~a~th f~oAe,~e Road, ,~uitc ~ • ~lllilmington, North ~arolina 284 f 2
9 f o.4f 2.2J f f • r'ax~ g 10.4g2.28gy • o~+tc~se~i.ua