HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0022900_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240807
SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY: NO HARD COPY WILL BE MAILED
August 21, 2024
Tony Konsul
Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina
Email: tony.konsul@nexuswg.com
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Sugar Mountain WWTP
NPDES WW Permit No. NC0022900
Avery County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Sugar Mountain WWTP
on 8/07/2024. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with
the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NC0022900. The findings and
comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report
entitled "Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Eguino with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4500 or via email at
richard.eguino@deq.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
Richard Eguino, Environmental Specialist I
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS: Inspection Report
Ec: Laserfische
Travis Thomas (ORC), travis.thomas@nexuswg.com
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 N 52 NC0022900 24/08/07 C S31112171819 20
21 66
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----------------------Reserved-------------------
N67707172 73 74 75 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Sugar Mountain WWTP
291 Norwood Hollow Rd
Banner Elk NC 28604
Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
08:30AM 24/08/07 24/05/01
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Travis Shane Thomas/ORC/828-559-6032/
Other Facility Data
11:30AM 24/08/07 27/09/30
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Tony Konsul,PO Box 240908 Charlotte NC 282240908/Vice President of
Operations/704-576-1685/
Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Richard Eguino DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4500/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#1
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
8/21/2024
8/21/2024
NPDES yr/mo/day
24/08/07
Inspection Type
C3111218
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Richard Eguino, with the Asheville Regional Office, conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of
the Sugar Mountain Wastewater Treatment Plant on August 7, 2024, to verify compliance with Permit
No. NC0022900. Travis Thomas (ORC) with Carolina Water Service was present and assisted in the
inspection.
This site consists of three separate plants operating in parallel (one 0.3 MGD plant and two 0.1 MGD
plants). Each plant consists of an aeration basin, a secondary clarifier, sludge holding tank, liquid
chlorine disinfection, liquid dechlorination, and post aeration. The facility utilizes one shared
equalization basin and one shared effluent flow meter, and discharges into Flattop Creek.
Overall, the facility appeared well maintained and to be operating in compliance with NPDES Permit
No. NC0022900.
The following items were noted during the inspection:
Records/File Review:
Records were available for review and appeared organized and complete. The Annual Performance
Reports for 2022 and 2023 were not available—a review of eDMRs shows that average annual flows
were approximately 179K GPD for 2022 and approximately 165K GPD for 2023 which is below the
200K GPD requirement for preparing Annual Performance Reports.
Aeration Basins/Secondary Clarifiers/Digesters:
All three plants appeared to be operating properly and producing visibly clear effluent . Mr. Thomas
explained that the sludge blanket is maintained at approximately 1/2 the height of the clarifier. It was
discussed that the sludge blanket should not exceed 1/4 the height of the clarifier to reduce the risk
of carryover and effluent limit violations. Mr. Thomas explained that they have not been experiencing
any bulking and that sludge is wasted as needed. It is recommended that the wasting practice is
adjusted to maintain a better sludge blanket depth. Sludge is pumped out of the digesters and hauled
off to Boone WWTP by Appalachian Pumping and TTT Pumping.
Chlorination/Dechlorination:
The previous inspection report noted that the chlorine contact chambers and the dechlorination
chambers had deteriorating concrete lids. During this inspection it was noted that these chambers
had all been repaired and appeared in good condition. Post aeration occurs in the dechlorination
chambers.
Standby power:
The site employ’s an emergency generator with a sub-based diesel tank. The generator auto tests
once per week on Wednesdays, which occurred during this inspection. When the generator auto
started for the weekly test, it tripped the blower that feeds one of the smaller plants. Mr. Thomas
explained he has notified the electrician so this issue can be resolved.
NC0022900 17 (Cont.)
Page#2
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
Permit:NC0022900
Inspection Date:08/07/2024
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Sugar Mountain WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain-of-custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified
operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
The most recent annual performance report on file is representative of the 2021
calendar year--eDMRs were reviewed for 2022 and 2023 and annual average flows
are less than 200K GPD, below the threshold requiring annual performance reports for
these years. See summary for details.
Comment:
Page#3
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
Permit:NC0022900
Inspection Date:08/07/2024
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Sugar Mountain WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Process Controls analyzed include pH, DO, sludge judge, settleable solids, and
ammonia.
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Influent pump station was inspected and floats, alarms, and SCADA all worked
satisfactorily. There were no visible signs of overflows and grease accumulation was
minimal.
Comment:
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Screenings are allowed dry on grating that drips liquids back into the bar screens
before being added to the dumpster, which goes to landfill.
Comment:
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated?
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Page#4
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
Permit:NC0022900
Inspection Date:08/07/2024
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Sugar Mountain WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Are float controls operable?
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
# Is basin size/volume adequate?
Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin’s surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/l)
Mr. Thomas explained the plant runs best with the DO between 1 and 2 and
settleability is satisfactory. One blower tripped when the emergency generator ran its
weekly test. See summary for details.
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately ¼ of the sidewall depth)
Mr. Thomas explained that the sludge blanket depth is kept at about 1/2 the clarifier
sidewall depth--it was discussed that this should be at about 1/4th the sidewall depth. It
is recommended that the wasting practice is adjusted to maintain an acceptable sludge
blanket depth. See summary for details.
Comment:
Page#5
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
Permit:NC0022900
Inspection Date:08/07/2024
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Sugar Mountain WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Disinfection-Liquid Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de-chlorination?
Liquid chlorine is stored in its own building in the southeast section of the facility. There
is one 250 gal and one 300 gal tank . See summary for further details.
Comment:
De-chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?Liquid
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de-chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Sodium bisulfite is used for dechlorination. It is stored in its own building in the
northwest section of the property. There is one 250 gal and one 300 gal tank . See
summary for further details.
Comment:
Are tablet de-chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
The most recent permit was modified to change the flow monitoring influent to effluent.
The flow meter is less than a year old. It was discussed with Mr. Thomas that flow meter
calibration will be needed annually.
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Page#6
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320
Permit:NC0022900
Inspection Date:08/07/2024
Owner - Facility:
Inspection Type:
Sugar Mountain WWTP
Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up
power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
The facility has their own trailered diesel dispenser tank for filling up their emergency
generator. If needed they will have Gouge Oil deliver fuel. See comments for further
details.
Comment:
Page#7
Docusign Envelope ID: 29CA07AD-5F86-4691-920B-249002A30320