240812 Stamey Farms WMP 2024 Update.pdf

This plan has been prepared for:
Stamey Farms
Stamey Farms LLP
255 Stamey Farm Road
Statesville, NC 28677
Stamey Farms
8/12/2024
This plan has been developed by:
NCDA&CS DSWC
Michael Shepherd
191 S. Main St.
Mocksville, NC 27028
336-940-8901
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan,
re (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
(�// L/L�L
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan ApprovedBy:
pp BY �J l
Technical Specialist Signa re Date

Stamey Farms
8/12/2024
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Narrative:
2023 Stamey Farm Waste Plan Update
This waste plan update is to address the change of crops in some application fields, application
fields available for land application, nutrient concentration of waste source in the plan and the
farm's goals of closing the facility. The farm continues to receive wash water from Origin foods
across the street. In 2023 the farm will have corn grain, soybeans, and grass to land apply the
waste onto. The plan is to convert most everything into grass hay in the fall of 2023 which will
provide for a wider application window. Land application will consist of using the irrigation reel on
the 10 pulls or honeywagon broadcast application. The nutrient contents of the waste are low at
approximately 1 — 2 lbs. of nitrogen per 1,000 gallons so land application of waste will be limited by
the soil hydraulic loading limits to ensure the soil can uptake the waste and not result in runoff.
Application rates per hour and maximum application amount per application event are listed in the
table below.
Soil Type App Rate
In/hr Max Event
LcB2 0.4" 1 "
LcC2 0.4" 1 "
CeB2 0.4" 1"
CeC2 0.4" 1"
MdB 0.45" 1"
ChA 0.35" 1"
Stamey Farms is in the process of closing the facility and eventually the waste structures. The
municipal sewer system is being extended from the City of Statesville Regional Airport to 140. The
timeline for this extension is within the next two years. Once the sewer extension is complete,
Origin foods will connect into the sewer system to discharge their wash water. Stamey Farm has
applied and been approved for the Swine and Dairy Assistance Program to close out their waste
storage structures. Waste structures must be closed prior to December 2026 deadline for the
Swine and Dairy Assistance Program funding.
August 2024 Update:
This plan update is to address adding Alfalfa hay to several fields.
Alfalfa Application Rates:
Based on communications with NCDA&CS Regional Agronomist Daniel Overcash, it is suggested
that a maximum annual applied nitrogen rate of 50 lbs. per ton of expected yield be used for alfalfa,
depending on the soil types. In the Lloyd (LcC2) and Cecil (CeB2) soil types where alfalfa is being
grown, the expected yield is 5 tons of dry matter per acre per year. A Nitrogen rate of 50 lb/ton of
yield should be nearly equivalent to the N removed (50 lb/ton) in the harvested hay. If a
combination of haying and grazing is used be sure to reduce the N rate by 25% for the grazed
portion of total yield. Maintain accurate yield records so that modifications can be made to this plan
amendment in the future if necessary. Due to the low nitrogen rate of the waste water source,
caution should be given to over application of water resulting a root suffocation or fungal root
infection that can reduce yields.
8/7/2024 1:36:04 PM 1 / 2

Stamey Farms
8/12/2024
Application Window:
Start Month = 3/1
End Month = 8/31
Residual Nitrogen:
For a crop following alfalfa, 80 Ibs of N are to be applied as a residual credit. This would be
upon termination of an alfalfa stand and establishment of a different crop.
8/7/2024 1:36:04 PM 2 / 2

Sources in Plan
Stamey Farms
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
u 1001
Stamey Farms Liquid waste generated 9,125,000 gals/year by a 1 Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure
Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 42 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
6,347
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
6,347
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
4,231
Broadcast
4,231
Irrigated
4,231
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
4,231
47,378
(43,147)
102,180,005
(93,055,005)
Year
4,231
54,956
(50,725)
118,523,390
(109,398,390)
Year
4,231
41,545
(37,314)
89,599,096
(80,474,096)
Year 4
4,231
22,309
(18,078)
48,113,687
(38,988,687)
8/7/2024 9:39:25 AM 1 / 1

1
2
3
a
s
6
7
8
9
1a
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Stamev Farms PAN Application Rates Ob/ad by Field and Crop
Tract
Field
Acres
Crop PAN application rate: (Ibs. Plant Available Nitrogen per Acre )
Corn Wheat Small Grain Soybean Orchardgrass Alfalfa Fescue
Grain Grain Cover Double Crop Hay Hay Pasture/Hay
Application Windows
2/15-6/30
9/1-3/31
9/1-3/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
3/1-8/31
8/1-7/31
1914 1 9.2 132 98 144 30 172
2018 1 12.8 135 118 30 159 172
2019 1 16.2 132 105 30 144 172
2019 2 7.5 135 125 30 159 172
5689 3 18 123 92 136 30 163
9347 Pull 13-7 5.91 123 97 30 136 163
9347 Pull 13-8 6.03 123 97 30 136 163
9347 Pull 13-9 5.14 135 125 30 159 172
9347 Pull 5A-1 5.91 135 125 30 159 172
9347 Pull 5A-2 5.67 135 125 30 159 172
9347 Pull 5A-3 8.61 135 125 30 159 172
9347 Pull56-4 5.72 123 97 30 136 163
9347 Pull56-5 8.23 123 97 30 136 163
9347 Pull56-6 7.64 133 97 30 136 163
9347 Pull 7-1 5.7 135 125 30 159 172
9347 Pull7-16 5.29 135 118 159 30 172 -
9347 Pull2-36 9.77 123 92 136 30 163 250
9347 Pull2-26 9.08 135 118 159 30 172 250
9347 2 10.9 123 92 136 30 163 250 -
9347 3 2.9 - - - - - - 202
9347 5A 3.21 135 125 30 159 172 -
9347 5B 2.21 123 97 30 136 163 -
9347 6 4.85 - - - - - 152
9347 7 3.1 135 125 30 159 172 -
9347 8 4.3 - - - - - 145
9347 9 19.6 152
9347 10 4.2 152
9347 11 3.2 - 152
9347 12 12.5 - - - - 150 -
9347 13 8.12 123 97 30 136 163 -
9347 14 9.1 - - - - - 142
9347 15 23.3 123 97 30 136 163 - -
Total acres
Total lbs. PAN for all acres (by crop)
263.89
26,168
1 21,486
1 13,099
22,499
35,880
7,438
7,343
cropland *Any crop following Alfalfa must have N reduced by 80 Ibs.
hay or pasture *Any crop following Soybeans must have N reduced by 20 Ibs.
*Any crop following Small Grain Cover must have N reduced by 30 Ibs.

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Wettable
Acres
SMU
LI
Crop Name RYE
Recom-
mended
PAN
PLAT
Rating
P205 (lbs/acre)
Crop
Removal Applied
1914 -
1
11.55
9.2
LcB2
13
Corn, Grain
171 Bushels
132
Unknown
75
120
Wheat, Grain
55 Bushels
98
Unknown
28
89
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
93 Bushels
144
Unknown
74
131
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
2018 -
1
14.1
12.8
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
33
123
107
Wheat, Grain
66.3
Bushels
118
Unknown
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
103 Bushels
159
Unknown
82
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
2019 -
1
17
16.2
LcB2
13
Corn, Grain
171 Bushels
132
Unknown
75
120
Wheat, Grain
59 Bushels
105
Unknown
30
96
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
69 Bushels
144
Unknown
55
131
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
2019 -
2
8
7.5
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain 176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 1 / 6

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
5689 —
3
18
18
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain 160 Bushels 123 Unknown 70 112
Wheat, Grain
51.7
Bushels
92
Unknown
26
84
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
87 Bushels
136
Unknown
70
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull 13-
7
5.91
5.91
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
1 3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull
5A-1
5.91
5.91
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
9347
Pull 13-
8
6.03
6.03
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull 13-
9
5.14
5.14
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
9347
Pull
1 5A-2
5.67
5.67
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 2 / 6

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
Pull
9347 5A-3 8.61 8.61 CeB2 13
Small Grain Cover
1 0 Tons
1 301
UnknownI
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57 157
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
9347
Pull 7-1
5.7
5.7
CeB21
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
9347
Pull
5B-6
7.64
7.64
LcC21
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull
5B-4
5.72
5.72
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull
5B-5
8.23
8.23
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
Pull 7-
1 B
5.29
5.29
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 3 / 6

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
Wheat, Grain
66.3
Bushels
118
Unknown
33
107
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
103 Bushels
159
Unknown
82
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
9347
Pull 2-
3B
9.77
9.77
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
51.7
Bushels
92
Unknown
26
84
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
87 Bushels
136
Unknown
70
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
301
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
121
Alfalfa Hay
5.0 Tons
250
Unknown
68
228
9347
Pull 2-
2B
9.08
9.08
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
66.3
Bushels
118
Unknown
33
107
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
103 Bushels
159
Unknown
82
145
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
Alfalfa Hay
5 Tons
250
Unknown
62
228
9347
2
30.5
10.9
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
51.7
Bushels
92
Unknown
26
84
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
87 Bushels
136
Unknown
70
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
121
Alfalfa Hay
5 Tons
250
Unknown
62
228
9347
3
2.9
2.9
Lc C2
13
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
202
Unknown
72
184
9347
5A
23.4
3.21
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
1 0 Tons
1 30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
9347
5B
23.8
2.21
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain 160 Bushels 123 Unknown 70 112
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 4 / 6

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 Bushels
136
Unknown
28
124
Small Grain Cover
64 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
9347
6
4.85
4.85
LcC2
13
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
152
Unknown
7
138
9347
7
10.6
3.1
CeB2
13
Corn, Grain
176 Bushels
135
Unknown
77
123
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
125
Unknown
35
114
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
82 Bushels
159
Unknown
66
145
Small Grain Cover
1 0 Tons
1 30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
172
Unknown
57
157
9347
8
4.3
4.3
MdB
13
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
145
Unknown
7
132
9347
9
19.6
19.6
LcC2
13
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
152
Unknown
7
138
9347
10
4.2
4.2
LeC2
13
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
152
Unknown
7
138
9347
11
3.2
3.2
CeC2
13
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
152
Unknown
7
138
9347
1 12
12.5
12.5
Md6
13
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
150
Unknown
50
137
9347
13
25.2
8.12
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
163
Unknown
54
148
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
9347
14
9.1
9.1
ChA
6.6
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
142
Unknown
7
129
9347
15
23.3
23.3
LcC2
13
Corn, Grain
160 Bushels
123
Unknown
70
112
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
97
Unknown
27
88
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
64 Bushels
136
Unknown
51
124
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
30
Unknown
0
27
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 5 / 6

Planned Crops Summary
Stamey Farms
Orchardgrass Hay 1 3.7 Tons 1631 Unknownl 541 148
Totals: I 354.801 263.89
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
LI
Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient None
<2
leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> = 2 & < = 10
leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone.
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index
Rating 6-
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
8/7/2024 9:38:55 AM 6 / 6

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
Res.
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
(Ibs/A)
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Field
Source
Total
Wettable
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract ID
ID
ID
SMU
Acreage
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
1914 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Corn, Grain
171
2/15-6/30
132
0
0
Broad.
132
284.49
0
2,617.35
0
Bushels
1914 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Wheat, Grain
55 Bushels
9/1-4/30
*98
0
0
Broad.
49
105.61
0
971.59
0
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Broad.
135
290.96
0
3,724.29
0
Bushels
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Broad.
59
127.16
0
1,627.65
0
Bushels
2019 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Corn, Grain
171
2/15-6/30
132
0
0
Broad.
132
284.49
0
4,608.80
0
Bushels
2019 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Wheat, Grain
59 Bushels
9/1-4/30
*105
0
0
Broad.
53
113.15
0
1,833.05
0
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Broad.
135
290.96
0
2,182.20
0
Bushels
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
1,010.28
0
Bushels
5689 -
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Broad.
123
265.10
0
4,771.74
0
Bushels
5689 -
3
'1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Broad.
46
99.14
0
1,784.55
0
1
Bushels
1
1
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 1 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
1,495.53
0
13-9
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
1,598.53
0
13-8
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
2,641.91
0
-2B
I
I
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
2,590.00
0
-3B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
1,566.72
0
13-7
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
1,719.57
0
5A-1
I
I
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
1,649.74
0
5A-2
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
2,505.16
0
5A-3
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
1,516.35
0
5B-4
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Broad.
135
290.96
0
1,539.18
0
-1 B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
2,181.75
0
5B-5
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
290.96
0
1,658.47
0
-1
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
265.10
0
2,025.34
0
5B-6
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
630.32
0
13-8
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
692.38
0
13-9
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
860.28
0
5B-5
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
763.77
0
5A-2
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Irrig.
46
99.14
0
968.62
0
-3B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
617.77
0
13-7
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
796.10
0
5A-1
Bushels
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 2 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Irrig.
59
127.16
0
1,154.62
0
-2B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
597.91
0
5B-4
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Broad.
59
127.16
0
672.68
0
-1 B
I
I
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
798.61
0
5B-6
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
1,159.80
0
5A-3
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
767.81
0
-1
1
1
Bushels
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Broad.
123
265.10
0
2,889.55
0
Bushels
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Broad.
46
99.14
0
1,080.65
0
Bushels
9347
3
* 1001
LcC2
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
202
0
0
Broad.
202
435.36
0
2,960.46
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Broad.
135
290.96
0
933.98
0
Bushels
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Corn, Grain
160
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Broad.
123
265.10
0
585.86
0
Bushels
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
432.40
0
Bushels
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Broad.
49
104.53
0
231.01
0
Bushels
9347
6
* 1001
LcC2
4.85
4.85
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,588.86
0
9347
7
* 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Corn, Grain
176
2/15-6/30
135
0
0
Broad.
135
290.96
0
901.98
0
Bushels
9347
7
* 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
417.58
0
Bushels
9347
8
* 1001
MdB
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
145
0
0
Broad.
145
312.51
0
1,343.80
0
9347
9
* 1001
LcC2
19.60
19.60
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
6,420.94
0
9347
10
* 1001
LcC2
4.20
4.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,375.92
0
9347
11
* 1001
CeC2
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,048.32
0
9347
12
* 1001
MdB
12.50
12.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
323.29
0
5,269.61
0
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 3 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
13
* 1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Corn, Grain
160
Bushels
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Broad.
123
265.10
0
2,152.59
0
9347
13
* 1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Broad.
49
104.53
0
848.78
0
9347
14
* 1001
ChA
9.10
9.10
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
142
306.05
0
2,785.02
0
9347
15
* 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Corn, Grain
160
Bushels
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Broad.
123
265.10
0
6,176.75
0
9347
15
* 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
9/1-4/30
1 *97
1 0
0
1 Broad.
49
104.53
0
2,435.55
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
102,180.01
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
9,125.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
(93,055.01)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 4 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen
Comm.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
Res.
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
(Ibs/A)
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Field
Source
Total
Wettable
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract ID
ID
ID
SMU
Acreage
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
1914 --
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
30
64.66
0
594.85
0
1914 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Soybeans, Manured,
93 Bushels
4/1-9/15
362
0
0
Broad.
144
310.36
0
2,855.29
0
Double Crop
1914 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Wheat, Grain
55 Bushels
9/1-4/30
*98
0
0
Broad.
49
105.61
0
971.59
0
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
30
64.66
0
827.62
0
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Soybeans, Manured,
103
4/1-9/15
401
0
0
Broad.
159
342.69
0
4,386.38
0
Double Crop
Bushels
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Broad.
59
127.16
0
1,627.65
0
Bushels
2019 --
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
523.73
0
2019 --
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Soybeans, Manured,
69 Bushels
4/1-9/15
268
0
0
Broad.
144
310.36
0
5,027.79
0
Double Crop
2019 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Wheat, Grain
59 Bushels
9/1-4/30
*105
0
0
Broad.
53
113.15
0
1,833.05
0
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
242.47
0
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Broad.
159
342.69
0
2,570.15
0
Double Crop
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
1,010.28
0
Bushels
5689 -
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
30
64.66
0
1,163.84
0
5689 --
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Soybeans, Manured,
87 Bushels
4/1-9/15
338
0
0
Broad.
136
293.12
0
5,276.07
0
Double Crop
5689 -
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Broad.
46
99.14
0
1,784.55
0
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
191.06
0
13-7
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
194.94
0
13-8
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 5 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
166.17
0
13-9
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
30
64.66
0
587.09
0
-2B
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
191.06
0
5A-1
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
184.92
0
5B-4
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
30
64.66
0
342.04
0
-1B
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LCC2
9.77
9.77
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
30
64.66
0
631.71
0
-3B
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
246.99
0
5B-6
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
278.35
0
5A-3
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
266.07
0
5B-5
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
184.27
0
-1
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
183.31
0
5A-2
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Soybeans, Manured,
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
1,732.31
0
13-7
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Soybeans, Manured,
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
1,767.48
0
13-8
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
1,761.41
0
13-9
Double Crop
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Soybeans, Manured,
103
4/1-9/15
401
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
3,111.59
0
-2B
Double Crop
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Soybeans, Manured,
87 Bushels
4/1-9/15
338
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
2,863.73
0
-3B
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Soybeans, Manured,
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
2,412.34
0
5B-5
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Soybeans, Manured,
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
1,676.62
0
5B-4
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
2,950.53
0
5A-3
Double Crop
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Soybeans, Manured,
103
4/1-9/15
401
0
0
Broad.
159
342.69
0
1,812.81
0
-1 B
Double Crop
Bushels
1
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 6 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
1,953.31
0
-1
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
2,025.27
0
5A-1
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Soybeans, Manured,
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Irrig.
136
293.12
0
2,239.40
0
5B-6
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Soybeans, Manured,
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Irrig.
159
342.69
0
1,943.03
0
5A-2
Double Crop
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
617.77
0
13-7
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Irrig.
59
127.16
0
1,154.62
0
-2B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
692.38
0
13-9
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
630.32
0
13-8
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
860.28
0
5B-5
Bushels
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Irrig.
46
99.14
0
968.62
0
-3B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
796.10
0
5A-1
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
763.77
0
5A-2
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
597.91
0
5B-4
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Wheat, Grain
66.3
9/1-4/30
*118
0
0
Broad.
59
127.16
0
672.68
0
-1 B
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Wheat, Grain
54.5
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Irrig.
49
104.53
0
798.61
0
5B-6
Bushels
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
767.81
0
-1
Bushels
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Wheat, Grain
70.2
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Irrig.
63
134.70
0
1,159.80
0
5A-3
Bushels
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
30
64.66
0
704.77
0
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Soybeans, Manured,
87 Bushels
4/1-9/15
338
0
0
Broad.
136
293.12
0
3,194.95
0
Double Crop
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Wheat, Grain
51.7
9/1-4/30
*92
0
0
Broad.
46
99.14
0
1,080.65
0
Bushels
9347
3
* 1001
LcC2
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
202
0
0
Broad.
202
435.36
0
2,960.46
0
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 7 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Small Grain Cover
64 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
71.45
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
103.78
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Broad.
159
342.69
0
1,100.02
0
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
35 Bushels
4/1-9/15
136
0
0
Broad.
136
293.12
0
647.78
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
432.40
0
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Broad.
49
104.53
0
231.01
0
9347
6
'1001
LcC2
4.85
4.85
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,588.86
0
9347
7
' 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
100.22
0
9347
7
* 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
82 Bushels
4/1-9/15
319
0
0
Broad.
159
342.69
0
1,062.33
0
9347
7
' 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Wheat, Grain
70.2
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*125
0
0
Broad.
63
134.70
0
417.58
0
9347
8
1001
MdB
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
145
0
0
Broad.
145
312.51
0
1,343.80
0
9347
9
1001
LcC2
19.60
19.60
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
6,420.94
0
9347
10
1001
LcC2
4.20
4.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,375.92
0
9347
11
1001
CeC2
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,048.32
0
9347
12
1001
MdB
12.50
12.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
323.29
0
5,269.61
0
9347
13
1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
262.51
0
9347
13
1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Broad.
136
293.12
0
2,380.09
0
9347
13
' 1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Broad.
49
104.53
0
848.78
0
9347
14
" 1001
ChA
9.10
9.10
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
142
306.05
0
2,785.02
0
9347
15
" 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
753.26
0
9347
15
* 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
64 Bushels
4/1-9/15
249
0
0
Broad.
136
293.12
0
6,829.58
0
9347
15
* 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
1 Wheat, Grain
54.5
Bushels
9/1-4/30
*97
0
0
Broad.
49
104.53
0
2,435.55
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
118,523.39
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 8 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
9,125.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
(109,398.3
9)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 9 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
Waste Utilization Table Year 3
Nitrogen
Comm.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
Res.
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
(Ibs/A)
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Field
Source
Total
Wettable
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract ID
ID
ID
SMU
Acreage
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
1914 --
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
3,410.48
0
1914 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
11.55
9.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
172
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
4,745.02
0
2018 -
1
* 1001
CeB2
14.10
12.80
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2019 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
6,005.41
0
2019 -
1
* 1001
LcB2
17.00
16.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
523.73
0
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
2,780.28
0
2019 -
2
* 1001
CeB2
8.00
7.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
242.47
0
5689 -
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
163
30
Broad.
163
351.31
0
6,323.53
0
5689 -
3
* 1001
LcC2
18.00
18.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
163
351.31
0
2,076.22
0
13-7
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
163
351.31
0
2,118.38
0
13-8
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
1,905.42
0
13-9
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
-2B
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
-3B
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
2,190.86
0
5A-1
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
3,191.76
0
5A-3
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
1,961.03
0
-1B
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 10 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
163
351.31
0
2,891.26
0
5B-5
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
163
351.31
0
2,683.99
0
5B-6
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
2,113.01
0
1
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
163
351.31
0
2,009.48
0
5B-4
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
2,101.89
0
5A-2
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.91
5.91
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
191.06
0
13-7
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.91
5.91
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
191.06
0
5A-1
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.14
5.14
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
166.17
0
13-9
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
7.64
7.64
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
246.99
0
5B-6
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
6.03
6.03
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
194.94
0
13-8
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
-2B
9347
Pull 2
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
-3B
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
5.72
5.72
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
184.92
0
5B-4
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
8.61
8.61
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
278.35
0
5A-3
9347
Pull
* 1001
CeB2
5.67
5.67
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
183.31
0
5A-2
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.29
5.29
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
-1B
9347
Pull
* 1001
LcC2
8.23
8.23
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
266.07
0
5B-5
9347
Pull 7
* 1001
CeB2
5.70
5.70
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Irrig.
15
32.33
0
184.27
0
-1
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
9347
3
* 1001
LcC2
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
202
0
0
Broad.
202
435.36
0
2,960.46
0
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 11 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Broad.
163
351.31
0
776.39
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
1,189.96
0
9347
5A
* 1001
CeB2
23.40
3.21
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
103.78
0
9347
5B
* 1001
LcC2
23.80
2.21
Small Grain Cover
64 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
71.45
0
9347
6
*1001
LcC2
4.85
4.85
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,588.86
0
9347
7
* 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Broad.
172
370.70
0
1,149.18
0
9347
7
* 1001
CeB2
10.60
3.10
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
1 0
100.22
0
9347
8
* 1001
MdB
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
145
0
0
Broad.
145
312.51
0
1,343.80
0
9347
9
* 1001
LcC2
19.60
19.60
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
6,420.94
0
9347
10
*1001
LcC2
4.20
4.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,375.92
0
9347
11
* 1001
CeC2
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
1 0
1,048.32
0
9347
12
* 1001
MdB
12.50
12.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
323.29
0
5,269.61
0
9347
13
* 1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Broad.
163
351.31
0
2,852.61
0
9347
13
* 1001
LcC2
25.20
8.12
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
262.51
0
9347
14
* 1001
ChA
9.10
9.10
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
142
306.05
0
2,785.02
0
9347
15
* 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Broad.
163
351.31
0
8,185.45
0
9347
15
� 1001
LcC2
23.30
23.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
30
0
20
Broad.
15
32.33
0
753.26
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
89,599.10
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
9,125.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
(80,474.10)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 12 / 14

Waste Utilization Table
Stamey Farms
Waste Utilization Table Year 4
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
9347
Pull 2
-2B
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Alfalfa Hay
5 Tons
3/1-8/31
*250
0
0
Irrig.
250
538.81
0
4,892.43
0
9347
Pull 2
-3B
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Alfalfa Hay
5 Tons
3/1-8/31
*275
0
0
Irrig.
250
538.81
0
5,264.22
0
9347
Pull 2
-2B
* 1001
CeB2
9.08
9.08
Orchardgrass Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
172
0
30
Irrig.
172
370.70
0
3,366.00
0
9347
Pull 2
-3B
* 1001
LcC2
9.77
9.77
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Irrig.
133
286.65
0
2,800.56
0
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Alfalfa Hay
5 Tons
3/1-8/31
*250
0
0
Broad.
250
538.81
0
5,873.08
0
9347
2
* 1001
LcC2
30.50
10.90
Orchardgrass Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
163
0
30
Broad.
133
286.65
0
3,124.48
0
9347
3
* 1001
LcC2
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
202
0
0
Broad.
202
435.36
0
2,960.46
0
9347
6
* 1001
LcC2
4.85
4.85
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,588.86
0
9347
8
* 1001
MdB
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
145
0
0
Broad.
145
312.51
0
1,343.80
0
9347
9
* 1001
LcC2
19.60
19.60
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
1 0
6,420.94
0
9347
10
*1001
LcC2
4.20
4.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,375.92
0
9347
11
* 1001
CeC2
3.20
3.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
327.60
0
1,048.32
0
9347
12
* 1001
MdB
12.50
12.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
323.29
0
5,269.61
0
9347
14
* 1001
ChA
9.10
9.10
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
142
306.05
0
2,785.02
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
48,113.69
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
9,125.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
(38,988.69)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
8/7/2024 9:39:37 AM 13 / 14

- \ ,r
n ..
r
Or
u
+� a
1
v
R gRIM
All
l ,)
i
Tt
�Obgle Earth

Google Earth
N
700 ft

Stamey Farms Land Application Fields :
2�
\< >>« 2 O «
Legend
jand Pulls�

Field 6
Field 11
Google Earth
Field 9
Field 14
Field 8
Field 12
900 n

Google Earth
Tract Al
a y
w• Field 1 �+' •
<ary
;
r. a
Y3'
yo �++'
�. .
Tract2019 a__..f�
Field 2 *' aRfi
.AShb'nQk. Rd- --
Ashfim ORd6
�y
Ae
N
I 600n I

Tract 1914 Field 1
vvv M L01 u 1
i
. NewlonDr.
Tract 5689 Field 3
ip{
1
1
I
1
Lepentl
O APPrtto�Fems
Buffers
t
1 � Y
�1
A
N
700 ft

Stamey Farms Land Applications Fields
Legend
O AFloicfion Fields
Buffers I
9 s74
H

♦ 'n
r) 0 m m
0 0-
3 o
0 0
CL
Ln
smal
3
0
ro
rD
0
O
3
0
<
G)
m
Z
m
z
El
0 r) r
'D jD n
z
" o
is - r)
rL
—
0
Zm
fp
4 3 >
0
-0 go
3 0 cn
CL n
0
cn
rD
0
Cts
O
CU W
im,
CL
(D
Rr
M
>
0
0-
(D
r_
0
(D
(D
(D
(D
(D
(D
ro
ID
;
-<
rD
CL
0-
0
ro
CL
a
<
CL W
LA --Sro
- m
CL
Qj
m
o < 0
0
CD
(D
CL
(D
CL
cr
<
Ln
0
M
<
r�
=r
rD
M-
�
0--a
e-t
r-
CD
(D
0_
0 V
GQ
0
ET
m
m
m
=
*
=;
(D
(D (D
o-
0
=
= 0_
CL
CD
M
W
0
r
C2-
<
rr
0 Z
0
0
cy
(n
CL
0
(1)
0
0
r)
-N
LA
C:
<
0
n
aD
(D
I
z
>
r)
0
0
CL ro
='
C_
o
77
(D
o
Z
0
w
:3
0
CD
2LO
, a:
(D
Ln
� 0
rD -
,
CD
CD
o
C)
e-D
o
rD
rD
n
0
Ln
,+
(D
rD
7'
(D
a)
(D
CL (D
CL
ID
Ln
0
r+
(D
r3
rD
co
rD
L,
=
rD
(D
M
rD
0
0
Ln
M
1+
o
ol
<
m
rD
CD
fu
ID
NJ
m
rD
Ln
0
rD
M
1 UV

MXFMI
(D
(D <
(D
CL (D
CL cr
(D M
ro
77
(D
<
M
n CL
CD 0-
0-70 =
C)
(D (D
I
FE
7)
m
C)
uj
Co
>
>
>
CY
0
(D
0
O
O (D
CL
0
0
O
0 0 DODD 00000
0 CL if w (= :z x — -n -n Ln Ln
E Z;;. 5 - ID D - w M a)
_a (D Ln c I -S
us rt CL W _ w ai ru
;:� r+ 0 -0
C: 0 . - M (D rD CAD
7.
n < (D :3 fD-e"t J CL CL
Ln M CL
r<D E
Ln
CL (D
Ln 90 r O Q (A
CL 0- M
M ID E E
3 CL Ln
c c —
n x
0
CD
as 3 -03 :E --h (D -0 -0 +
(D 0- on LLnn
(D
Ln cu 3 0 0
Ln + — = —h —h
-< 0 rj o
03
(D
CL a)
M CL
0 5
O o'Q 0-
Vs
'n
Ply
>
m
Ln
,-+
3
0
C)
O
=3
CL
z
4
0
CL
<
0
0
m
0rr
Ln
N
Ln
0
CD
Ln
=3
Cr
fD
0 W e-
L') P9 0 0_10 =.
W jZZ' (D eD — CL 0
z 0 —(D 3 FD
c'
ro L <
m M (D
0 (D
0--c = ,
= (D (D Q o- 0
n CL tD n < � 0
(D -h CL M
(D 0
(D
CL (D (D
V) 0
(D
0 CrQ M
" uo rD
M = C: Z
0 3
=; n = o
0 0
3
Ln
aq
CL
CL
eD
O -0
SD
-a
(D
tra
P.
I
OE
el!
I

(D
0
0
m
O
Gw
> 0 >
fD Z
M C:
0 (D X
3 no m
*0 cr
0
0
El El El 1:11:1 El
0 n
n
L", 0 0
o
o
<
® < <
, m m
(D
(D
0
c
3
o
0
ru
0ro ,
m
0
00
Lq 0
rD
0
0
rb 0
rr
Ln
co
Ln
,Fl
0
0
0
G)
>
K <
W r-
LM
Ln ;
(D
rD
n
C)
rD
a)
= 0
LA cr
0
3
-1
0
m
-0
0
>
(D
LA.
CL
0
>
3
0
c
HT
1+
V)
000 0000
0 C: -1 O. E70 T G) G)
owmnn
=r m -0 w3
(D C) (D M
O
<
CO rD (D -0
.0 57-
CL
C:
Di (D
LA aq V) a)
(D a CL ID Ln
Ln
rD
0 a 3
3
rj
M rD
Ln sn 0
(D
CL rD
(D
U)
3 Ep 8,
'I n
0 0
rD Ln Ln
rD m (D
N
0- CL
;;Y- (D Lai. W.
vi
rD
3
0
35
>
;5-
0
R Fl R
El
r
® m F
0
C)
ro 0m
-
(D
z
x 3
(D
ram.
nroa
rD +
(D
0
0
0-
Ln
rD
rD
Go
ro
CD
za
>
(D =
n 0) m
0 (D
1 3 0
-0
ro
C) >
0
z
m
O
1111 El
0
>
<
(D rD
rD
0 0
rD 0_-0 (D
CL 0
rD n
CD CL
x
(D rD M rD
c-
'n c-
Ln C,
3
r+ V, 0
a,
3 rD
3
rw
0
fD
3
0
CL
0
n
I

O (D Ln (A yi :74; o X CD
(D e-4- + (D M n M
-0 . = (D -0 <
e+ 0 -a M
co 0 (D + (D -n 0L" 0-0
7
<
0 (D 0-
Ln 0 CA EA (D 0.)
CL
2- 2-
0 Ln :3 C) 0- n 0 (D
0 w (D (D " o DL ; 7F o 0
:3 (D :z n L:� < o- < m
(D aj 73 0 n 0 (D C7 rD LA
n Q) < (D Ln
0- 0 0 �<
rD m-5 'D cr
EA z" L-� (D CD w o-
a) 0 -1 rD 1 c M
0- 3 -0 'a
CT (D a) —
(D CD 0
rD
0 cr 0 0
as n (A rD
Q_ (D
CL 0 cCL
CL C: rD Q C:
(D
< 0 0 E7 r+
rD
(D CL
m
M rD a
(D PD
9
Ln
0 r-
0 0 0 0
(D 0
<
m rD
cu w
CL M
0
0 ro
=3 ID R (D CDLn
o tn
cr
(D 0 0
3 co as ap
0
0 -.+, 0 0
LA (D Ln
(D 0
(D
CA
V)
0 ® (D z Pr
n 0
LM Q < (D 0
0 (D CL
3 3 ,
aq n 0
tD
(D
3
r+ CL
5 m
IMP
®R
0
0
0
C
V)
G)
CD
(A
0
0
M
<
0
r
rD
3
rD
3 —
m CL
rD
r+
0
* (A
m
m
x
rD
0
(D
>
Q. Z
M
CL 5)
cr
c
nol
0 =
(D
3
(D
0
u 0
Ln
70 (D
<
(D
CD
0-
(D -3
0
r+
(D =-
Ln
I

0.
0
0
sera
(D
LA
NEI E E '
0, 0o,
PD E 3
ID ID -0 -0
rD VQ
m 0 D IR rD < Ln (D
eD
o<
-2--o 6- m
m 0 o- L" I;D @
M Cl Z ID
0 0
rD ID 2. 0 m 0
<0 -
w Ln m =r En -0
- rD
0 , -0 0 mo <' c
Ln + a) 0 < 3
(D cL n F� 1+ o Ln -0
rD 0 0- 3 = cr
CL 41 E: W CD ID ID = ID
m (-D 0 CD Cr
(D �; U :E m 0 rD CL 0
'n 3 o �; - M V) m o CL I -%
w m 1+ n CL
cr
Oa aCD m 3 w
-0 < CL (D z CL =r
w EA 0 --h
m 3 Ln+ 0 3 0 n 3 0
rD 0 E M
Ln 0 0 m LM 0
< IL < 0, =� . " = =
(D 2� CL
PD
CD -0 0 3 m CD :E
CA uq 0 ;w
CL
oi 0
(D
PD 0 = ,
3 rD
7- (A CL
m 0 o 0 CD
Ln rs
o
Ln 1,4 0 =
V) -
O
-0 (D
rD
r+
> >
0 0 = (D 0.
0 * F, 0 C. E
CL :a— 3 L a)
0_-u m
0 all 3
- rD (D M ft) -0 CL
w cr < 0- 0- D cr
0-
CL 0
= = (D
n 0 0 P.
rt CD CL
Nj
�
cu F,
:a- �
0o
CL CD
oa o- <
0 11 F;. m
=S -0 + Ln
0 -0 0 --s ?D
N a) --q, Z5
LL - m
ct 0 rD 0 CL < 0 m 7z-
0 0 m = 00
0 CL
0
0
m
0
CD
I

I
-1
>
3
0
0
0-
0
11 El El
M CL (D
S a ,
77- Q M-
io '0 CL
<
(D
0 0
n CL <
0 (D
M
0
CL
Ln Z
CD
O
is
O
ar
0
3
O
=r
rD
♦
0
0
R
Al
CIL
0
0
c
LM
(DLA
(n
Do El 0 0
0 * ET > --i
0 Ln M Ln -0 �
0
70
o
Ln
CD in
rD -0 CL
Ln
rD m -0
ro
0 n. =r
D
E- o o
CL
M <
M 0 m ®
0
HT
B = w w - CL r,D
rD -0 -0 m
0 �o -0 CL
0--a m
<
- -< (D
m wcra m
0) a
Ln Ln
fn 0 --
C: 0 0
(D O n :3
=
v,cu CA 7:1
(D LA
+
n rD L^
(D
(D
W-1 Xl
=
Sl
� CL
co
0 =
0
r <
0
ro
0 cn
0 GQ
r+ -
X
CL
2,
0
C
ro
L72

rD
0
WR
zzzzmm>>
nnnnwwm-
zzzzmm�K
> > G)
:o 7o � � -n i- '," 0)
Ul L/I V) I)n W M iU
UI un V) rat to CO
(D
CL CL 0- CL
I I I I
0- CL 0- CL
� 4p W Uj
-g� NJ 00 Cm O—j 5— I
n
Ili N) 0 LD
I rD CD
O
CD (D M
CD 0 (D
<
V)
,-+ ET L=n 3
'D (D CD (D
rt
rD 0
OLt CL
I Ln
W 0 , + -0
W >
CD
Z- rD
rD
(D
rD
rD
3
(D 0
ID rD CD
CL
V)
r+
0
crQ
rD
22 �
0
o
C)
< 0
(D <
n
CD
0. CL
ID ID
0 0 0 C2- CL
< < < c c
IS
9

❑ C
Q CL S4� C
C3
® uc'
CD
R.
p CD
ft4 CD
CD
i~D O
� O
.v. e
Ll
CD
cn C
p' < fir � Z
O fl UQ �2 O 4
O CD CD- O
CD y WO 0 �n
® O� g
CD CND
00CD
Q ca
CD CD
UQ vn (7Q
(D
cn
I
❑
❑
n� X
JP CD
CD
CA
CD
uq
n .
aR
CL
O
CD
U)
r
UP
v
c- CD
Un
CD-
L o
o
CD
CD
L
C
a�
W�
LPG

z
G
CD
CD
�1
ro
N
W
z
uj
a
P
� j
°
CD
CDTZ
❑ ❑ Li ❑ Li
cz
° s rn 3 n O ROQ t3"
O gv
O ran CCDD
CD
CD n CD N CD
cn CD V,CD
p rr CAD `C
w CD CD
M CD
CD �° O CD Q CDco
Sn O t�n n
S� a�4 CDCAD�CD CD n CD
n
r� CD CD
Eo O O
® r CD.
Sy CD
CD
n e-t c PD
cz
r' O O
Q O CD U4
fla 0
CD G.,cn
Q Q CD
CD
CD U — rn
CD
G
uq
CD
•
[•]
r-r rr
CL N S.
® "t 0
SID .r.
,r
CD
(TQ
O
CD = CD
w ut4 O C n O
na CT
CD CD O �_
flo O..
CTQ
.1
fD
CD

Version —November 26, 2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
h4ethods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian,
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEO under GS 15A NCAC
D D 13B .0200.
71 7 Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
F] D Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off -farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ,
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
F-1 NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health,
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit),
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additopal temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
Signature of Farm
Signature of Technical Specialist
Date
�-2?_z0z,
Date

Bural S to
Google Earth
IVc.oi9'a%,
N
ac 1000ft

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD
NRCS
704-235-2180
704-878-3039
704-873-6761 x 3
704-873-6761 x 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:-
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

gNRCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for: Stamey Farms
22
Michael Shepherd
Farm:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
Tract(s):
Date:___/_J
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncaqr.gov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
ht4o.-Anutrients. soil. ncsu. edu/index.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
htto://www. ncagr. gov/SWC/tech/12l7committee. ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P 'drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index.php
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from a well.

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.