300003_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240904

®Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - Co_S � O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: i County-A)ZAt Region:
Farm Name: �� ��, �- (�Y� Owner Email: 51nI k0611 A�lalne�r�,Lo��
Owner Name: Al�im �Q��,� Phone: 37j�p-4012-G '
Mailing Address: 'TI J C-10CA ►� SV(��Q/ NC 2]D7—(A
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: '1�Jq��f Title: Phone: ;zU_%$A 8_12;1
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
1
Back-up Operator: �W( � jf Certification Number: Ym owl yialysi
Location of Farm: Latitude: ��p� 5aY�{-Z�` Longitude: %' -31" V5
5i10.i Ciree 7 1
S40�nI �e�k 1r2$7© EiL �.d �.V vvhn v" .
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J�J_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: ?.;, _ 02Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W/
*M�� Spillway?: V
Peered Freeboard(in): 12-"
Observed Freeboard(in): t
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo 0 NA ❑ N E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes `5?1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA [] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes -Q�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes '&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:] Yes ;�<,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail4to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ]KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes `2f�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes '<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA D NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design []Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?I ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tilVaste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑Este-�r'ai Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking ❑ 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Q Date of Inspection: q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No 'V�CNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes -�KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �U _\
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes $ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [:] No ;?�NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes :KNo ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes '52�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ]2�Alo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility,.to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
21. SOS day. ZC4'1 Cw\J1ekd �I�!2A-� dw�a�i�n 2U2� .
\Z1Z3 ILb 2± 3113 -2.,} 41cl2A j12A 2�A U�4 kl4(2
0,2-3 0,
VYf \rr Y-Y \w
Reviewer/Inspector Name: N , '_?6fW_0L _ Phone: JAL�1479 " —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: "I 19'`2-4
Page 3 of 3 511212020