HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0038261_Complete File_19950502State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
DAVID GANNON
GUILFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS
120 FRANKLIN BLVD
GREENSBORO NC 27401
Subjecrt
Dear Mr. Gannon:
May 2, 1995
A /i
A4
�4
A
ED FE F3
03- 06-ov
Rescission of NPDES Permits - Guilford County Schools _
Colfax Elementary School , NPDES Permit No. NC0038261 }'
Stokesdale Elementary School, NPDES Permit No. NC0038237
Rena Bullock School, NPDES Permit No. NCO038202
Summerfield School, NPDES Permit No. NCO038245
Guilford County
,& r n FvQ,u
Reference is made to the rescission of the subject NPDES Permits. Staff of our
Winston-Salem Regional Office have confirmed that none of the above schools currently
discharge wastewater and these Discharge Permits are no longer required. Therefore, these
NPDES Permits will be removed from our computer systems, effective immediately.
If in the future you wish to again discharge wastewater to the State's surface waters,
you must first apply for and receive new NPDES Permits. Discharging without a valid
NPDES Permit will subject the discharger to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day.
If it would be helpful to discuss this matter further, I would suggest that you contact
Steve Mauney, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, Winston-Salem Regional Office at
910n71-4600.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Guilford County Health Department
Winston-Salem Regional Office
ftrmits & Engineering Unit - Dave Goodrich - w/attachments
Fran McPherson, DEM Budget Office
Operator Training and Certification
Facilities Assessment Unit - Robert Farmer - w/attachments
Central Files - w/attachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
Clams
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO038261
PERMTITEE NAME: Guilford County Board of Education / Colfax
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.
PI
Minor J
Design Capacity: 0.0067 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow): n/a %
e% air' Mom 1TWITTM
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Reedy Fork
Class: WS-III NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-06-02
Reference USGS Quad: C18SE (please attach)
County: Guilford
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/90 Treatment Plant Class: 1
Classification changes within three miles:
IT',
��
t,''3' ° �
0 4 � a Lay i
Requested by: Mack Wiggins Date: 11/6/89
Prepared by: /' ( , SCo�jlk Date: 0 28
Reviewed by: 2d, a Da 11, VITS
Modeler
Date Rec.
I #
MD-,
\\ \3 85
'54411
Drainage Area (miz) 0.10 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): o,09
7Q10 (cfs) 0,p Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0.0 30Q2 (cfs) 0. 0
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters Tungrw4ure boy Vetal Cel.%rrl� condud;QQ' y
Upstream i Location fir'
Downstream Y Location zoo 4d JQ2&dwam
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
2 ►
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
O
N
D.O. (mg/1)
6
TSS (mg/1)
30
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
ZOo
ZOO
pH (SU)
6 _q
6-1
Fer ,v
n c ure
d; cintr fc sirtcy4
u, an
- MA
teMlnwl
Q 011 A &,I
MI IINK11 O a
� dt C /I 6
4vund N nG4M
I. ,rc n
6c elro
iac i- r
wr.�rn nV,
Jule
of J
s
t
1
1101 nit Cl,�S-taA3 J.M.+$.
� �_ � I � ,8 rry Waler Gar en C ]fAl Qi
O
950
L 1,r1 \ /
UU�LI LJ. --_ J J ii
r _._J. r hem.
JUN• - 950 li p1 //
Aj
PP
"�C11. :• / 'jntl'i. �a l . .1. II �.�I� �• ' i •'.i9 _
J�o n Pilgrim, O_BMr_• S �.I v �J50� a5 I
-0O IPR •� �� i I ` •���
VDec moo'\\ • .1 ! • �I NQ Ty I� // • • �
N\11
421
949
. � �\•./i/ .ate a_ —i "\ I Q � II' k`:_>:. '�.
� V'Itv
Tno
94
906
L •I II (`
c\11g /r • CI�\ tl Sou ._—__ -E�4^r, .�� I _ �+ / �� � -4�'b °
0
1 ! - •It :.-. ; „Vi V c..__ • � li. %. ICI - _
V o
II
° 1�, � �_\\ \ _. rr 11 I _ - •I li .••I _ `�\ I/`\"_—__9�- � =_____ I, .; I
r
6 O zsozl
Mir 0
_ •L I
20011
C Sandy ol! m
p { •I _ II \ I �iij�Te >' ° .�AI III \,• 1, .G 4,' � "' � .'° ° '�l1 � m $� .E�e — S
Nr \ \- 00 / %i _ Ill \ / \c_ 999 I850
1 ( a ', r9se �I,1' •\ It \ 1l - /Radio.o
fir; n -.' \ I '\. �. i / .;/ '° Tower
71
Request No.: 5464
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM ------------
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
Colfax Elementary
NCO038261
Domestic
Existing/Renewal
UT to Reedy Fork
WSIII-NSW
030602
Guilford
Winston-Salem
Mack Wiggins
11/6/89
C18SE
School
Drainage area:
Summer 7Q10:
Winter 7Q10:
Average flow:
30Q2:
-------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
Summer Winter
0.100
sq mi
0.00
cfs
0.00
cfs
0.09
cfs
0.00
cfs
Wasteflow (mgd): 0.0067 0.0067
BOD5 (mg/1): 21 30
NH3N (mg/1): 20 NR (Existing Limits)
DO (mg/1): 6 6
TSS (mg/1): 30 30
Fecal coliform (M/100m1): 200 200
pH (su): 6-9 6-9
---------------------------- MONITORING ----------------------------------
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location: 50 feet upstream, when there is flow
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location: 200 feet downstream of discharge
----------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------------
Per standard Division procedure for discharges to streams with 7Q10=0
and 30Q2=0, recommend removal of discharge as soon as an alternate method
of waste disposal can be found. The instream monitoring requirement may
be dropped as soon as the facility agrees, in writing, to a schedule for
removal of discharge. Recommend instream monitoring of temperature, DO,
conductivity, and fecal coliform.
The downstream monitoring site has been changed to provide data more
representative of the discharges impact.
Knoy
- tst►n s1�jwraoannx �er e4 {ea�o/n c%►��tIuoc_C_vtnd}oJ: tchaf; ClnN:Njrh
,wa bL6td----------- -
Recommended by:--_�!"rL'�^'� -v_ ��Q�{X�-------- Date: lS SR
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
U1t�`1b� Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL
----"--------------
SERVICES BY: DEC 16 1989
---------------
Date: -LItz M -----
Date:
Date:
-REL`F'VED
N,C, D.6},i 11,90D
NOV 2 1 1989
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
H
€I
VI
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATNN! 14 Date Rec.-
��i7 fi r qc��
Facility Name: [j- Date
Existing
Proposed Permit No.: _fJ� (��,3 '02�� Pipe No.: 6'cl County:
Design Capacity (MGD) : d, 0�,6 % / Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow) : �� O _.
Receiving Stream: //T fo Yoc/11/ �C Class: IT Sub -Basin:
Reference USGS Quad: S5 T (Please attach) Requestor: /r_� •, T.0 Regional Office
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design 71emp
7010 (cfs)
Drainage Area (mi2): Q. I (M'Z Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs) D .� c 30Q2 (cfs) I
Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): Slope (fpm)
Velocity (fps): V , I Ki (base e, per day): K2 (base e. per day):
OL.
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
(; _
/1 S.
d iginal Allocation
Revised Allocation
Comments:
Effluent ;Dnthly
Characteristics t_verage Comments
Confirmation O
Prepared By: ('�) � P eviewed By: // Date
L-ey
on,
For Appropriate .Dischargers, List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
Effluent Monthly Maximum Daily
Characteristics Average Average Comments
Type of Product Produced Lbs/Day Produced I Ufltient Guideline Reference
Request No. 8 S 4
----- WASTELOAD ALL.00ATION APPROVAL.. FORM ---------------------
Facility Name
T-ape Of Waste
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Reouestor
Drainage Area (so mi)
7010 (cfs)
Winter 7010 (cfs)
3002 (cfs)
COI -FAX ELEM SCHOOL
DOMESTIC
UT REEDY FORK £-&
A -II
030602
GUILFORD
WINSTON-SALEM
HELEN FOWLER
.1
0.0
0.0
------------------------- RECOMMENDEB EFFLUFNT LIMITS --------------------------
A'Ut'illQ.lr WUCUA .
Wasteflow (mgd) : .0067 .0067
5-Day BOD (mg/1) : 21 30
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1): 20
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1): 6 6
PH (SU) : 6-8.5 6-8.5
Fecal Coliform (/100ml): 1000 1000
TSS (mg/1) : 30 30 N✓q%(� �����
--';" /.
----------------------------------- COMMENTS ------------ ..�...�--------------
------------------------------------------- -----------------------•----------
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( /i EXISTING ( NFW ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATTnN ( ) OF THOSF PRFVTOUSLY ISSUED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
SUPERVISOR.MODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
.......... _ .%.... ___.___ _._.DATE
BATE
__ .d ... DATE