NC0001210_Complete File - Historical_20050804

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
August 4, 2005
Mr. Henry B. Mangum, Jr.
Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemier
P.O. Box 3463
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Permit NC0001210
Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Mangum:
Division staff has confirmed that the subject permit is no longer required. Therefore, in
accordance with your request, NPDES Permit NC0001210 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If in the future your client's firm wishes to again discharge wastewater to the State's surface
waters from the former Monarch Hosiery Mills location, they must first apply for and receive a new
NPDES permit. Discharge of wastewater without a valid NPDES permit will subject the responsible
party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact Charles Weaver of my staff at the telephone
number or address listed below.
Sincerely,
/64
�i�
rirAlan W. Klimek
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Jenny Freeman
NPDES Permit file
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
512 North Salisbury Street. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Internet: h2o.encstate.nc.us
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
Y-Lr�, . -
NorthCarolina
JVaturallry
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/100% Post Consumer Paper

Re: NC0001210 rescission request
Subject: Re: NC0001210 rescission request
From: Jenny Freeman <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:16:31 -0400
To: Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
CC: Steve Tedder <[e-mail]>
What they say is true. I did an inspection up there in May 2005, the building is vacant. No discharge
from the wwtp. They do have an active Pump & Haul permit with us - they send in monthly reports
on those activities, which there have been none as of late.
No problems on my end with rescinding NC0001210.
On 8/4/2005 1:25 PM, Charles Weaver wrote:
The attorneys for Monarch Hosiery state that "Monarch ceased all business operations prior to
May 1, 2005" and that Monarch "is not currently engaged in any active business operations."
They are requesting rescission of the permit. Shall I rescind it?
Let me know - and thanks [as always] for your help.
CHW
Jenny Freeman
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone] ext 294
FAX: [phone]
1 of 1 8/4/2005 2:19 PM

EXSENIPRUET
ADAMS KLEEMEIER
July 28, 2005
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Dept. of Environment
and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTN: Ms. Fran McPherson
Re: Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. ("Monarch')
Charleston Permit No: NC0001210
Charlotte
Columbia Dear Ms. McPherson:
Greensboro
This will confirm our telephone conversation of this date regarding the annual permit
Greenville invoice for the period from May 1, 2005, to April 30, 2006, received by Monarch, a
Hilton Head copy of which is enclosed.
Myrtle Beach
We are attorneys for Monarch in this matter. Monarch ceased all business operations
prior to May 1, 2005, and has been engaged in the process of "winding up" and
liquidation since that time. It is not currently engaged in any active business
operations.
Based on the foregoing, you have indicated that Monarch is not liable for the charges
described in the annual permit invoice and that our conversation and this letter will
enable you to handle the relevant file accordingly.
If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not to hesitate to
contact us. Otherwise, your assistance in this matter is certainly appreciated.
701 Green Valley Road T 336.373.1600
Suite 100 (27408) F 336.273.5357
P.O. Box 3463 Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC
Greensboro, NC 27402 Attornevs and Counselors at Law
GBO 673943v1

Division of Water Quality
July 28, 2005
Page 2
With kindest regards, we are
Very truly yours,
NEXSEN PRUET ADAMS KLEEMEIER, PLLC
Henry. angum, Jr. U
HBM,Wslm
cc: Mr. Roger W. Overman (w/encl.)
Mr. Larry D. Overman (w/encl.)
Mr. Jack D. Overman (w/encl.)
Mr. Vance Forrester (via electronic mail, w/encl.)
GB0673943vi

June 18, 2004
Mr. Richard C. Keziah
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
PO BOX 1205
BURLINGTON NC 27216-1205
Michael F. Easley, Governor
I William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Waiver of Monthly Reporting Requirement
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. — Altamahaw Plant
NPDES Permit NC0001210
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Keziah
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2B, Section .0506 enumerates
specific reporting requirements applicable to holders of NPDES permits issued by the State of
North Carolina. 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (a)(1)(E) states that permittees must continue to submit
monthly discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) to the Division of Water Quality, even when there
is no discharge from the facility during the reporting period. This requirement may be waived by
the Director of the Division of Water Quality during extended periods of no discharge.
I have reviewed your correspondence of June 8, 2004, which describes the unfortunate ceasing of
manufacturing operations at Monarch Hosiery Mills' Altamahaw Plant and requests a suspension
of NPDES reporting requirements for the facility's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). You
state that due to the plant shut down, the WWTP receives no influent from manufacturing
processes. However, the WWTP will continue to serve a small office staff working on the site.
This small volume of domestic flow to the WWTP is planned to be pumped and hauled from the
facility for treatment and disposal. A pump and haul permit was secured on May 24, 2004 so
you could perform this activity.
After reviewing your letter and considering the recommendation of the staff of the Winston-
Salem Regional Office, I have agreed to waive the requirement to submit monthly DMRs for the
subject facility, effective June 1, 2004. The DMRs for September 2003, December 2003, and
May 2004 should be submitted, and include a summary report on progress made in implementing
those actions that will preclude the WWTP from discharging. Please note that the issuance of
this waiver is conditional upon your compliance with all terms and conditions of the pump and
haul permit. Please be further advised that if and when a discharge resumes, the discharge must
be monitored as per the terms of the NPDES permit and other applicable rules or statutes. Please
keep the Winston-Salem Regional Office apprised of any pertinent developments that arise
regarding wastewater treatment at this facility, especially if plant operations resume and the
WWTP is again activated.
Aga
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 800 623-7748 [phone] Fax: [phone]

In addition, this letter waives the requirement for certified operator visitation during this period
of no discharge activity. Though the visitation requirement is waived, it is strongly suggested
that knowledgeable personnel continue to perform routine oversight of wastewater management
operations in order to minimize the chance of an unintended discharge.
Please also be advised that while requirements for operator visitation, monitoring and reporting
are being waived during the period of no discharge, your company is still required to pay the
Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee that is associated with this and all
NPDES permits.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact the
Water Quality Section staff in our Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely.
rj4 . 44
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
Charles Weaver
Jeanne Phillips
Central Files

JUN-10-2004 09:06 FROM:NC DIVISION OF WATER 3367714630 TO:89197339612 P:2/3
I L4 N.C.
MONARCIi HOSIERY MILLS9 INC. / JUN
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, NO 27216.1205
FAX [phone]
June 8, 2004 '\
Mickey
/
. ichael M. _
Division of Watct:-Quarzry
W' - a em Regional. Otficc
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0001210
Dear Mr. Mickey:
2729 Ossipee Front St.
Altamahaw, NO 27202.0247
Phone: [phone]
1.800-334-5168
Monarch Hosiery ceased manufacturing operations at our Altamahaw, NC
Plant in June 2002. We presently have seven employees using the office space
at this facility. Since the only waste going into our waster treatment plant is
domestic waste from our of£1ce, we applied for and have received a Pump and
Haul permit. Our Pump and haul permit number is W00023939 and is dated
May 24, 2004.
We are requesting that our NPDES Permit status be changed to " on hold".
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincere ,
Richard C. Keziah

JUN-10-2004 09:06 FROM:NC DIVISION OF WATER 3367714630 TO:89197T39612 P:�/3
Mieltacl F. Faslcy, Govcmor
William G• Ross Jr., Secramry
North Carolina celuai eat of Environment and Natural Rmourcrs
Alan W. Klimek. P. F- Director
Division of water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 30, 2004
Mr, Richard C. Keziah, President
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, NC 27216-1205
SUBJECT: DMR Submittal
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
NPDES Permit No. NC0001210
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Keziah:
1 spoke with Boyd McKenzie on April 15, 2004, concerning the process for
Monarch Hosiery to suspend submittal of the monthly self -monitoring reports (DMR's).
This option is possible because Monarch Hosiery has not discharged any wastewater
into Reedy Fork Creek since October 2002.
The process involves submitting a letter to our office explaining your current
situation and requesting that the permit status be changed to "on hold". Please note,
however, thatthis letter cannot be submitted until a Pump and Haul permit is issued and
in effect for the small quantity of domestic wastewater that Monarch still. generating.
The "on hold" status will not affect the validity of the permit, your ability to transfer
the permit nor the annual permit fee payment requirement. It simply means that our
computer system no longer expects DMR's from the Monarch facility.
Should you have any questions, please give me a call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael M. Mickey
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Central Files
WSRO
RIM
N. C. Division of Water Qualiry/Woter Quality Section SSS waughtatNl Spcct WinstoDSalcm. North Carolina 27107 (336) 771�4600 customer Service
I Q / 7J! 1.977-93.6748
V

01
, , I I Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 25, 2002
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Richard C. Keziah, President
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
P. O. Box 1205
Burlington, North Carolina 27216-1205
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0001210
Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Keziah:
Division staff have reviewed and approved your renewal application for an NPDES discharge
permit. Accordingly, the Division is forwarding the subject NPDES permit. This permit is
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
The final permit includes the following changes from the draft permit as a result of comments
provided by the Environmental Protection Agency during the review of the draft permit and
the effluent testing submitted to the Division on June 21, 2002:
BOD, COD and TSS limits: The daily maximum and monthly average limitations for
BOD, COD and TSS were modified. A sock production of 3690 pounds per day and 3657
pounds per month were used to derive the daily maximum and monthly average limits.
These limits are based on production figures from 1999 and 2000. If these production
figures are expected to increase during the permit cycle you should request a permit
modification to revise the limits prior to the production increase;.
Total Copper: Monthly monitoring for total copper was added to the permit. Copper was
detected in the effluent above the allowable concentration.
Ready Fork Creek is listed as an impaired stream on North Carolina's 303(d) list. This means
that the stream does not meet all water quality standards. Although no particular sources
are identified as the cause for this degradation, the Division will continue to monitor
compliance at your facility. A plan is in place to develop a nutrient fate -and -transport model
for the Jordan/Haw River watershed to better identify point and non -point source impacts.
Ultimately, more stringent limits may be included in your permit as a result of the modeling
efforts.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and
binding.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleiah. North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
FAX[phone]
On the Internet at htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
N CDENR
Customer Service
1800 623-7748

Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0001210
Monarch Hosiery WWTP
Page 2
This permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits that may be required by the Division of Water Quality,
the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or
local governmental permit.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at
telephone number [phone], extension 595.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Central Files
NPDES Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Roosevelt Childress / EPA

Permit NC0001210
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
2729 Ossipee Front Street
Altamahaw
Alamance County
to receiving waters designated as Reedy Fork Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, and III hereof.
The permit shall become effective November 1, 2002.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2006.
Signed this day September 25, 2002.
original Signed BY
Devid A. Goodrich
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0001210
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Monarch Hosiery Mills. Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.05 MGD wastewater treatment facility located in
Alamance County at 2729 Ossipee Front Street, Altamahaw, discharging via outfall
001 and consisting of the following wastewater treatment components:
• Bar screen
• Aerated holding and equalization tank
• Pre -aeration basin
• Aeration tank
• Clarifier
• Sludge holding tank
• Sand filter
2. Discharge from said treatment works into Reedy Fork Creek, a class C-NSW stream
in the Cape Fear River Basin, at the location specified on the attached map.

-� s ••
ILI
�F; , 4.
Outfall 001
.
' ( `` I
J /
1 ��( �1 � � �I���\\`� ✓J �� �'} , Aso',\ C
if
r— J
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Stall Grid/Onad: Ossipee, N.C. Latitude: 36' 10' 30" N f I
Facility Location
Longitude: 79' 31' 00" W not to scale v
Receiving Stream: Reedy Fork Creek Drainage Basin: Cape Fear River Basin NPDES Permit NC0001210
Stream Class: C-NSW Sub -Basin: 30602 North Alamance County

Permit NC0001210
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT - CHARACTERISTICS
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly Average
-
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location[
Flow
0.05 MGD
Continuous
Recorder
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 200C
9.55 pounds/day
19.06 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
40.27 pounds/day
81.05 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
COD
146.28 pounds/day
295.20 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorusz
2.0 mg/L Quarterly Average
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Upstream & Downstream
pH3
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Upstream & Downstream
Sulfides
0.40 pounds/day
0.95 pounds/day
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Chromium
0.20 pounds/day
0.48 pounds/day
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Phenols
0.20 pounds/day
0.48 pounds/day
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NOz+NOs+TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Acute Toxicity^
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Conductivity
Quarterly
Grab
Upstream & Downstream
Notes:
1. Upstream = at least 50 feet upstream from the outfall. Downstream = at NCSR 1558.
2. Compliance shall be based upon quarterly average of weekly samples (see A. (2)).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow 24 hour) with testing in March, June, September and December (see A. (3)).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (2) NUTRIENT CONDITION FOR PERMITS WITH PHOSPHOROUS LIMITS
This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to change the effluent limitations on nutrients for
this discharge depending upon the following:
1. The findings of a study by the Division determine nutrient control is necessary.
2. Local actions do not successfully reduce the nutrient loading on the receiving stream.
3. The onset of problems conditions in the receiving stream.

I•• rZ�1 K611h113VAH
A. (3) ACUTE TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In
A Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised -July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be
performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24-hour static test. The effluent concentration at
which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the
procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be performed during the
months of March, June, September and December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGE6C. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the
report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to
the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing,
this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be
re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.

ED srtt�.S
A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
o e ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
;Fi�11I102 61 FORSYTH STREET
t11 PNUTED ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
JUL 0 8 2002
Ms. Teresa Rodriguez
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJ: NPDES Permit for Monarch Hosiery
Permit No. NC001210
Dear Ms. Rodriguez:
I w'.y91 10 2002
-- Le ao.a!In
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR MOA, we have completed review of the draft
permit referenced above and we have no objections to the draft permit conditions. We request
that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are made to the
permit prior to issuance, or if significant comments objecting to the permit are received.
Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit when issued.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable 6 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30 % Poslconsumer)

Monarch Hosiery update
Subject: Monarch Hosiery update
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:02:46 -0500
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
looks like we've made good progress
EPA comment
NC response
EPA reply.
The format for these is:
1. The NC Std. Form C was used - only sulfides, chromium, and phenols
were marked as "present". This application and its data are
insufficient. If this concern is not addressed, it would be a basis
for an EPA objection, per 40 CFR 122.21(e)(1). If NC does have
analytical data for this facility for the parameters/fractions specified
below, EPA would accept that data. -•
My interpretation of the requirements of the EPA Form 2C is that because
this facility is a textile facility and hence a primary industry, at
least one analysis should be conducted and submitted for 1) the
volatile, acid, and base/neutral GC/MS fractions, per 40 CFR 122,
Appendix D, last Table 1 and 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(v)(A); 2) all total
metals, cyanide, and total phenols, per 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(v)(B); and
3) BOD5, COD, TOC, TSS,.NH3, temp (both winter and summer), and pH, per
40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(iii). Also, the permittee must address the
requirements of conventional and nonconventional pollutants at 40 CFR
122.21(g)(7)(vi)(A). EPA would accept a condition in the draft permit
to require this monitoring and submittal to NC within the first 6 months
of permit issuance. The permit should also include a specific reopener
if the results indicate the need for permit modification.
I agree that they have to do the pollutants analysis specified in
122.21
Appendix D. I have already told the facility that they need to
perform
these analysis. As soon as I get the information I will forward it.
Thanks. Will permit issuance be held up until these data are received
and reviewed by NC and EPA? If not, you could issue this permit with
specific requirements re its submittal and a reopener based on what the
data may show. What do you plan to do? Depending on your answer, looks
like this issue is resolved.
2. Because this facility is covered by an effluent guideline that is
production -based, 40 CFR 122.21(g)(5) applies. This section requires
that the permittee include in its application a reasonable measure of
its actual production. Based on the fact sheet, you apparently had this
data available to you. Please make sure that in such future draft
permits that are sent here for review, those data are submitted to us
since they don't seem to be required by NC Std. Form C.
The production data is in the file attached (1210 limits
calculations). This is a spreadsheet with the production data and
the calculations for the limits. This data was sent to Caroline
when she was reviewing the permit back in August 2001.
I am glad that you had previously sent something to EPA re this. I was
1 of 4 6/5/02 3:51 PM

Monarch Hosiery update
P
not aware of that. Am awaiting your fax of the second pg of the
spreadsheet. Comment re sending EPA the production data resolved.
3. Are the specific effluent guidelines that apply to this facility 40
CFR 410.52(a) and 410.53(a)? The fact sheet doesn't specify and it does
make a difference for what COD limits apply.
The applicable guidelines are 410.52(a) and 410.53(a) and (b). They
are also specified in the attached file.
Comment resolved.
4. The fact sheet seems to indicate that the max annual avg
production(of 4770# socks/day) from the years 1998, 1999, and 2000 were
used, as well as the max monthly (from that period) of 3974 #
socks/day). It seems strange that the max monthly from this period is
lower than the max annual avg prod - can you explain?
I do understand that the production from these years is less than
typical. However, 40 CFR 122.45(b)(2)(i) requires that permit limits be
based on "a reasonable measure of actual production". EPA does not
believe that the use of the max annual or max monthly average production
(even from a period of less production) meets that requirement. I would
like you to provide a rationale for how use of the max monthly
production over this period does meet that requirement. The use of
such maximums could be a basis for an EPA objection because the permit
would not meet the 40 CFR cite cited above.
Our interpretation of the reasonable measure of actual production
is the highest daily maximum and the highest monthly average for a
recent period of production. This is how this and other permit
limits are being calculated. We talked over the phone about how to
derive different acceptable measurements. When you look at the
data attached we can talk again about your suggestions.
I appreciate your sending the data and re-examining it yourself. Based
on our discussion, I am comfortable with your using the 1999 and 2000
data and checking whether 2001 data are similar. I am comfortable with
your using a daily max of 3690 #/day and a 95% confidence limit for the
monthly avg data. If you derive limits consistent with these, my
comment is resolved. Pls let me know how you derived the production
values that you used.
5. It would be very useful in future fact sheets if a sample calculation
of the monthly avg and daily max for at least one parameter required by
an effluent guideline was provided.
The file attached has a spreadsheet with the calculations for all
the limits.
Comment resolved.
6. This draft permit contains a daily max COD limit of 381.6 #/day.
The fact sheet indicates that in general, production for the last 3
years is lower than the long-term production. If this is the case, why
is this limit higher (less stringent) than the previous permit's daily
max COD limit of 342 #/day? (The BOD5 limits in the draft are lower
than the previous permit - this seems appropriate). The fact sheet does
not address this. On its face, this appears to be backsliding and could
be an EPA objection per 40 CFR 122.44(1). Pls explain.
2 of 4 6/5/02 3:51 PM

Monarch Hosiery update
The calculations for the COD limits were based on the applicable
effluent guidelines. COD was the only parameter that was higher
than the previous permit, we feel it is justified as it was
calculated following the guidelines.
I haven't run across a guideline like this one, where some items are in
addition to others. I'm waiting for clarification from a fellow staff
person here and will contact you as soon as I hear from them.
7. The previous permit contained effluent guidelines -based monthly avg
and daily max limits for sulfides, total chromium, and phenols. The
fact sheet says that a reasonable potential analysis was done for 1999
and 2000 data and it was concluded that there is no RP and thus, no need
to include limits for these parameters in this permit. Please know that
the regs only address the concept of and specify "reasonable potential"
in relation to water quality -based effluent limits that are in addition
to or more stringent than technology -based limits - see 40 CFR
122.44(d). The lack of RP cannot be used as a basis to delete or
backslide from technology -based requirements. The permit must continue
to require effluent guidelines -based limits for sulfides, total
chromium, and phenols. If not corrected, this would result in an EPA
objection per 40 CFR 122.44(1).
I agree with you that these limits should be in the permit. At the
moment that I did the permit I wasn't aware that the limits
couldn't be removed based on reasonable potential.
Based on your agreement to put these limits back in the permit, comment
resolved.
8. Does this permit contain or require BMPs? If not, why not?
This permit does not contain BMP other than what is on the general
conditions because all the activities take place inside the main
building.
I looked at the 7/17/01 letter from Dave to Caroline that transmitted
NC's boilerplate. I saw no language that specifically required BMPs be
developed. I left Dave a message asking what NC does re BMPs. The
seven other Region 4 states routinely require such language in their
industrial permits. Regardless of his answer, this is a programmatic
issue that I will bring up at the midyear. Comment resolved.
9. The receiving waterbody is listed as NSW. The permit does contain a
total P conc limit of 2.0 mg/l. Is there a need for annual avg mass
limits? Is the reason that total N is not limited because total P is
the limiting nutrient?
The limit included for phosphorus follows the basinwide plan
strategy in place for nutrient sensitive waters in the Haw River
watershed, which includes Reedy Fork Creek. This strategy mandated
a total phosphorus limit of 2 mg/l for dischargers over 50,000 gpd,
it does not require an annual average mass limit.
Comment resolved.
10. re the acute WET requirements, pls help me understand why testing
using Pimephales is done. Also, most other Reg 4 states use grab
samples to assess acute toxicity. Why does NC use composites?
I understand that this issue was clarified in your conversation
3 of 4 6/5/02 3:51 PM

Monarch_ Hosiery update
with Matt Matthews.
Matt told me the reason that fish are used as the species is to protect
NC's narrative standard that requires that acutely toxic conditions not
impede fish passage. NC uses composites because it is cheaper than
running tests on 4 separate grabs. Comment resolved.
4 of 4 6/5/02 3:51 PM

Re: Moqarch Hosiery Mills W WTP
Subject: Re: Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:40:33 -0400
From: Teresa Rodriguez <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
The following is in response to your comments regarding the draft permit for Monarch Hosiery Inc.:
1. The effluent data for Monarch Hosiery show that the facility is meeting all permit limits. Instream
data reviewed for 1999 and 2000 shows similar DO concentrations upstream and downstream of the
facility. Only two downstream samples were below 5 mg/l. In August 1999 downstream DO was 4.8
mg/l and 4.9 mg/l upstream and in June 2000, DO was 4.95 mg/l downstream and 5.52 mg/l
upstream. This facility is a small discharge with 0.16 % instream waste concentration and does not
appear to contribute to the impairment of the stream. The basinwide plan recommendation is to
develop a nutrient fate and transport model for the Jordan/Haw River watershed to better identify point
and nonpoint source impacts. A statement will be added to the final permit cover letter explaining the
strategy and the need for more stringent limits in the future depending on the results of the modeling
effort in the watershed.
2. The reasonable potential analysis was inadvertently omitted when the draft permit was sent for EPA
review. The file for the reasonable potential analysis is attached (Tox Spread Monarch 1210).
3. The proposed limits were established based on the production figures for the past three years and the
Effluent Guidelines in 40 CFR 410.52 and 410.53. The new limits are lower than previous permit limits
due to a decrease in production at the facility. The file with the production data for the facility and the
calculations for the allowable concentrations is attached (Monarch limits 1210).
4. See the attached file for item #3 above which includes the calculations showing that the new limits
represent BPT and BAT.
5. Monarch Hosiery has a total phosphorus limit of 2 mg/l. The basinwide plan strategy in place for
nutrient sensitive waters in the Haw River watershed, which includes Reedy Fork Creek, mandated a
total phosphorus limit of 2 mg/l for dischargers over 50,000 gpd. Furthermore, House Bill 515 outlines
the strategy for NSW waters statewide. Limits of 2 mg/1 total phosphorus and 5.5 mg/1 total nitrogen for
facilities discharging over 0.5 MOD are required under this strategy. Monarch Hosiery's discharge is
0.05 MGD, therefore, it is not subject to the total nitrogen limit requirement.
6. The limits included in the proposed permit are more stringent than the previous permit with the
exception of COD. The COD limit was calculated following 40 CFR 410 using the most recent production
data from the facility. The limits are technically justified and we feel this does not constitutes
backsliding.
Please advise if this information answers your concerns or if I can be of further assistance.
Teresa Rodriguez
[e-mail] wrote:
This letter is in response to the draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit for Monarch Hosiery Mills Wastewater
Treatment Plant (NPDES Permit No. NC0001210) in Alamance County. EPA has
completed its review of this draft permit and, in accordance with the EPA/
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource (NCDENR)
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and the federal regulations, we provide the
enclosed comments, and request for additional information:
1 of 3 3/6/02 8:08 AM

Re: Mogarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
M
1) This facility discharges to a 303(d) waterbody, Reedy Fork Creek, and
is biologically impaired due to unknown causes. Based on EPA's Draft
02/24/99 EPA Permitting Principles for Dischargers to Impaired Waters
and Flow Chart, the effluent characteristics may need to be more
stringent in order to protect the receiving water. Documentation is
needed to show that the discharge from Outfall 001 will not contribute
to a violation of water quality standards for Class C-NSW water
streams impaired by unknown causes.
2) A reasonable potential analysis of the wastewater discharged at
Outfall 001 was mentioned in the fact sheet but not provided.
3) The fact sheet and transmittal letter state a change from the effluent
limits but adequate justification is not provided for the individual
effluent limits proposed.
4) The permit does not reflect the effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently available as required by 40
CFR 410.52. The permit also does not reflect the effluent limitations
representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best available technology economically achievable
as required by 40 CFR 410.53.
5) Reedy Fork Creek is a nutrient sensitive waterbody and as such, should
have effluent limits for nitrogen and phosphorus.
6) Many of the limits in the permit were changed from the previous
permit. 40 CFR 122.44(1) states that generally, reissued permits
should contain limits that as stringent as the previous permit. The
Clean Water Act addresses several exemptions which allow "backsliding"
from limits of the previous permit. Backsliding was not addressed in
the fact sheets; it needs to be addressed in the fact sheet.
7) The permit application form provided with the draft permit was North
Carolina's own Standard Form C. This application does not provide the
effluent characteristic information required in the EPA application
Standard Form C which would be applicable to this facility. 40 C.F.R.
§ 122.21(a)(2)(iv) and 40 C.F.R. § 123.25(a) mandate that permit
applications used by the State require at a minimum the information
required in the EPA application forms. Therefore, EPA has determined
that the application used to develop the proposed Monarch Hosiery
Mills WWTP permit was inadequate and a complete application including
an evaluation of effluent characteristics is needed prior to the
issuance of this permit.
Please respond to these concerns and provide copies of any revised proposed
permits and fact sheets, for EPA review, before the final permit is issued.
Thank You.
Caroline Ejimofor
NPDES and Biosolids Permits Section
Permits, Grants and Technical Assistance Branch
EPA Water Management Division
2 of 3 3/6/02 8:08 AM

Re: Monarch Hosiery Mills W WTP
Subject: Re: Monarch Hosiery Mills W WTP
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:14:19 -0400
From: [e-mail]
To: Teresa Rodriguez <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
This letter is in response to the draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit for Monarch Hosiery Mills Wastewater
Treatment Plant (NPDES Permit No. NC0001210) in Alamance County. EPA has
completed its review of this draft permit and, in accordance with the EPA/
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource (NCDENR)
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and the federal regulations, we provide the
enclosed comments, and request for additional information:
1) This facility discharges to a 303(d) waterbody, Reedy Fork Creek, and
is biologically impaired due to unknown causes. Based on EPA's Draft
02/24/99 EPA Permitting Principles for Dischargers to Impaired Waters
and Flow Chart, the effluent characteristics may need to be more
stringent in order to protect the receiving water. Documentation is
needed to show that the discharge from Outfall 001 will not contribute
to a violation of water quality standards for Class C-NSW water
streams impaired by unknown causes.
2) A reasonable potential analysis of the wastewater discharged at
Outfall 001 was mentioned in the fact sheet but not provided.
3) The fact sheet and transmittal letter state a change from the effluent
limits but adequate justification is not provided for the individual
effluent limits proposed.
4) The permit does not reflect the effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently available as required by 40
CFR 410.52. The permit also does not reflect the effluent limitations
representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best available technology economically achievable
as required by 40 CFR 410.53.
5) Reedy Fork Creek is a nutrient sensitive waterbody and as such, should
have effluent limits for nitrogen and phosphorus.
6) Many of the limits in the permit were changed from the previous
permit. 40 CFR 122.44(1) states that generally, reissued permits
should contain limits that as stringent as the previous permit. The
Clean Water Act addresses several exemptions which allow "backsliding"
from limits of the previous permit. Backsliding was not addressed in
the fact sheets; it needs to be addressed in the fact sheet.
7) The permit application form provided with the draft permit was North
Carolina's own Standard Form C. This application does not provide the
effluent characteristic information required in the EPA application
Standard Form C which would be applicable to this facility. 40 C.F.R.
§122.21(a)(2)(iv) and 40 C.F.R. §123.25(a) mandate that permit
applications used by the State require at a minimum the information
required in the EPA application forms. Therefore, EPA has determined
that the application used to develop the proposed Monarch Hosiery
Mills WWTP permit was inadequate and a complete application including
an evaluation of effluent characteristics is needed prior to the
issuance of this permit.
Please respond to these concerns and provide copies of any revised proposed
permits and fact sheets, for EPA review, before the final permit is issued.
Thank You.
Caroline Ejimofor
NPDES and Biosolids Permits Section
Permits, Grants and Technical Assistance Branch
EPA Water Management Division
1 of 2 3/6/02 8:08 AM

DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0001210
Facility Information
Applicant/FacilityApplicant/Facility Name
Monarch Hosiery Mills
Applicant Address
P.O. Box 1205, Burlington, North Carolina 27216-1205
Facility Address
2729 Ossi ee Front St., Altamahaw, North Carolina
Permitted Flow (MGD)
0.05 MGD
Type of Waste
Domestic and process wastewater from socks dyeing
Facility Class
Class II
County
Regional Office
I Alamance
Facility Status
I Renewal
Winston-Salem
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream
Reedy Fork Creek
Drainage basin:
Cape Fear
Stream Classification
C-NSW
State Grid
C20NE
Use Support
PS
USGS To o Quad
Ossipee
303(d) Listed
Yes
Permit Writer
Teresa Rodriguez
Subbasin
030602
Date:
3/13/01
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
255
f '
x ° >J
Lat. 36° 10' 30" Long. 79° 31' 00"
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
47.8 -
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
60.8
30Q2 (cfs)
Average Flow (cfs)
229
IWC (%)
0.16
Summary
• The facility is a hosiery finishing facility. They receive finished socks which are dyed, dried and
packaged for distribution. The effluent from the dyeing machines and the domestic flow go into
the wastewater treatment plant. The domestic flow was estimated to be 1,625 gallons per day
based on one shift of 65 employees at 25 gallons per person per shift (15A NCAC 2H .0219
(1)(2)).
• Production figures for the years 1998, 1999 and 2000 indicated that the facility dyed a maximum
of 4770 lbs of socks/day. The maximum monthly average was 3974 lbs of socks/day. The
calculated limits using the most recent production data are lower than existing limits due to
reduced production figures in the last three years. They are projecting an increase in production
of 340 lbs/day with the addition of a new customer. The facility has not finalized a contract or
formal agreement for this additional production so it was not included for the calculations.
Adding the 3401b/day to the daily maximum and monthly average from the most recent
production figures (year 2000) will not increase their limits.
• The effluent guideline that covers this facility is 40 CFR Part 410 Subpart E, Kint Fabric
Finishing Subcategory, Sections 410.52 (BPT) and 410.53 (BAT).
• The wastewater treatment facility consists of bar screen, aerated holding and equalization tank,
Pre -aeration basin, aeration tank, clarifier, sludge holding tank and sand filter.
Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES Permil NC0001210
Pa-c I
Vs

Permit History/Issues
Reedy Fork Creek is listed in the 303(d) list as biologically impaired water from unknown causes.
Waste Load Allocation (WLA). A WLA was conducted in 1995. Total phosphorous was the only
water quality limited parameter.
COMPLIANCE REVIEW
DMR Data.
• Chemical Data. Two years of data was reviewed (1999 and 2000). The facility has consistently
met the permit limits. The average flow for this period was 0.0195 MGD.
• Toxicity Data. Two years of data was reviewed (1999 and 2000). The facility passed 8 out of 8
toxicity tests.
Reasonable Potential Analysis.
A RPA was conducted for Sulfides, Total Chromium and Phenols using the data from 1999 and 2000.
The permit limits were used as allowable concentrations as these are more restrictive than water
quality standards.
• Sulfides — The allowable concentration is 0.95 lbs/day. The maximum value was 0.31 lbs/day
and the maximum predicted concentration was 0.65 lbs/day.
• Total Chromium — The allowable concentration is 0.48 lbs/day. The maximum value was
0.08 lbs/day and the maximum predicted concentration was 0.18 lbs/day.
• Phenols — The allowable concentration is 0.48 Ibs/day. The maximum value was 0.04 lbs/day
and the maximum predicted concentration was 0.14 lbs/day.
None of the parameters presented reasonable potential.
DMR Instream Data Review.
Dissolved Oxygen was slightly below 5 mg/l in two occasions downstream and one occasion
upstream, during summer conditions. The lowest value recorded for instream DO was 4.81 mg/l.
Data for BOD, temperature and conductivity are within reasonable levels. As noted in the 1995 WLA,
the percent saturation in this waterboby is poor.
Regional Office Data.
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed on September 24, 2000. The facility was found
to be in compliance with their NPDES permit.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Limitations and Monitoring frequency for Sulfides, Chromium and Phenols —Eliminate limits
and reduce sampling frequency to monthly. The reasonable potential analysis showed no
reasonable potential to exceed allowable concentrations.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: May 16, 2001
Permit Scheduled to Issue: July 9, 2001
NPDES UNIT CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Teresa Rodriguez at [phone] ext. 595.
Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES N00001210
Page ?

Regional Office Comments
NAME: I / DA IT:
NPDES SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Favi $heel
Renewal -- NPDIiS \('(N(nl' Ill
Pa^_c

Facility Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. NC0001210
Domestic Flow
65 employees @ 25 al/person/shift
Flow: 1 0.001625 MGD
Parameter
Standard (mg/1)
Mthly ave Daily max
Load (lb/day)
Mthly ave Dail max
BOD
301
45
0.4111
0.61
TSS
301
45
0.411
0.61
Production Information
Effluent Guideline section: 410.50 Subpart E Knit Fa
Production units as per EG Ib/1000 Ib
Monthly average 3.974 Ib/1000 lb
Daily maximum 4.77 Ib/1000 lb
BPT or BAT
Parameter
Guideline limit
Daily max Mthly ave
Allowable Load (lb/d)
Daily max Mthly ave
BPT (410.52)
BOD
5
2.5
23.85
9.935
TSS
21.8
10.9
103.986
43.3166
BAT(410.53,a)
COD
60
30
286.2
119.22
Sulfides
0.2
0.1
0.954
0.3974
Phenols
0.1
0.05
0.477
0.1987
Tot Chromium
0.1
0.051
0.477
0.1987
BAT(410.53,b)
COD
20
101
95.4
39.74
Limits
Parameter
Daily max
(lb/d)
Mthly ave
(lb/d)
BOD
24.46
10.34
TSS
104.60
43.72
COD
381.60
158.96
Sulfides
0.954
0.3974
Phenols
1 0.477
0.1987
Tot Chromium
1 0.477
0.1987
Previous Limits
Parameter
Daily max
(Ib/d)
Mthly ave
(Ib/d)
BOD
28.50
14.25
TSS
124.26
62.13
COD
342
171
Sulfides
1.14
0.57
Phenols
0.5171
0.28
Tot Chromiumi
0.57
0.28

f
t�u�is (Zh(©r 3
AFFIDAVIT OF INSERTION OF ADVERTISMEI
The Times -News Publishing Company
Burlington, NC
Alamance County
I, LINDA WHITAKER Legal Advertising Manager of the The Times -News
Publishing Co., do certify that the advertisement of NCDENR/DWQ/Budget
entitled
Public Notice
State of North
Measuring 99 lines appeared in The Times -News, a newspaper publishi
Alamance County, Burlington, NC ,in issues of June 3, 2001
Legal Advertising Manager
$4PPo5.2 b
a
• /,� N�m2387i
Sworn to and subscribed before me this z day of l
Notary blic
My commission expires

DENR / DW Q / NPDES Unit
AMENDMENT TO FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT No.N00001210
Limits Development
The production data from Monarch Hosiery was reevaluated and permit limits for BOD, COD,
TSS, Sulfides, phenols and total chromium were recalculated.
Production data from 1999 and 2000 was used to calculate the limits. As per Monarch Hosiery
president, Mr. Richard Keziah, data for 2001 was not available but it was similar to 2000. The
data from 1998 was not used because it was not considered to be representative of actual
production.
To calculate the daily maximum limits a production of 3,690 pounds per day was used. To
calculate the monthly average limits a production of 3,657 pounds per month was used. These
figures are the maximum values for the two years. The data for the two years does not show
much variability, therefore the maximum values are an appropriate measure of production. This
procedure follows the policy established by the Division in 1995.
PPA
A priority pollutant analysis was performed on the effluent and results were submitted to the
Division on June 21, 2002.
The following parameters were detected:
• Copper — Copper was detected at 300 µg/1. The allowable concentration for copper is 68
µgll. Since copper is an action level standard, monitoring only will be included in the permit.
Action level policy will be implemented as needed.
• Aluminum, cadmium, lead, nickel and silver were detected below water quality standards.
• Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected at 89 µg/l. The criteria for consumption of
organisms is 5.9 14g/1. Since DEHP is considered a carcinogen, the average flow of the
receiving stream (229 cfs) was considered to calculate the allowable concentration. The
allowable concentration is 254.9 µg/1. DEHP is a component of plastic products and is a
common contaminant from sampling or laboratory handling. No monitoring will be required.
Teresa Rodriguez
6/27/2002

Facility Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. NC0001210
Domestic Flow
65 employees @ 25 al/ erson/shift
Flow: I 0.001625 MGD
Parameter
Standard (mg/1)
Mthly ave Daily max
Load (lb/day)
Mthly ave Daily max
BOD
30
45
0.411
0.61
TSS
301
45
0.411
0.61
Production Information
Effluent Guideline section: 410.50 Sub art E Knit R
Production units as per EG Ib/1000 lb
Monthly average 3.657 Ib/1000 lb
Daily maximum 3.69 Ib/1000 lb
BPT or BAT
Parameter
Guideline limit
Daily max Mthly ave
Allowable Load (lb/d)
Daily max Mthly ave
BPT (410.52)
BOD
5
2.5
18.45
9.1425
TSS
21.8
10.9
80.442
39.8613
BAT 410.53,a
COD
60
30
221.4
109.71
Sulfides
0.2
0.1
0.738
0.3657
Phenols
0.1
0.05
0.369
0.18285
Tot Chromium
0.1
0.05
0.369
0.18285
BAT 410.53,b
COD
20
101
73.8
36.57
Limits
Parameter
Daily max
(Ib/d)
Mthly ave
(lb/d)
BOD
19.06
9.55
TSS
81.05
40.27
COD
295.20
146.28
Sulfides
0.95
0.40
Phenols
1 0.48
0.20
Tot Chromium
1 0.481
0.20
Previous Limits
Parameter
Daily max
(lb/d)
Mthly ave
(Ib/d)
BOD
28.50
14.25
TSS
124.26
62.13
COD
342
171
Sulfides
1.14
0.57
Phenols
0.57
0.28
Tot Chromiumi
0.571
0.28

NC001210
Monarch Hosiery
Two year data summary 1999-2000
Date
Daily max
Mthly ave
(lb)
(lb)
Jan-99
3690
3542
Feb-99
3690
2835
Mar-99
3690
3069
Apr-99
3690
3492
May-99
3690
3519
Jun-99
3690
3543
Jul-99
3690
3542
Aug-99
3690
3573
Sep-99
3690
3572
Oct-99
3690
3574
Nov-99
3690
3380
Dec-99
3690
3657
Jan-00
3690
2566
Feb-00
3690
2734
Mar-00
3510
3102
Apr-00
3690
2880
May-00
3690
3059
Jun-00
3690
2952
Jul-00
3240
3010
Aug-00
3570
2946
Sep-00
3690
2887
Oct-00
3600
2987
Nov-00
3690
2846
Dec-00
3600
2881
Dailv max Mthlv ave
2 yr-Ave
3651
3173
2 r-Max
3690
3657
95th perc
3690
3574
90th perc
3690
3573
Ranked by
order
Date
Daily max
Date
Mthly ave
(lb)
(lb)
Jan-00
3690
Dec-99
3657
Feb-00
3690
Oct-99
3574
Apr-00
3690
Aug-99
3573
May-00
3690
Sep-99
3572
Jun-00
3690
Jun-99
3543
Sep-00
3690
Jan-99
3542
Nov-00
3690
Jul-99
3542
Jan-99
3690
May-99
3519
Feb-99
3690
Apr-99
3492
Mar-99
3690
Nov-99
3380
Apr-99
3690
Mar-00
3102
May-99
3690
Mar-99
3069
Jun-99
3690
May-00
3059
Jul-99
3690
Jul-00
3010
Aug-99
3690
Oct-00
2987
Sep-99
3690
Jun-00
2952
Oct-99
3690
Aug-00
2946
Nov-99
3690
Sep-00
2887
Dec-99
3690
Dec-00
2881
Oct-00
3600
Apr-00
2880
Dec-00
3600
Nov-00
2846
Aug-00
3570
Feb-99
2835
Mar-00
3510
Feb-00
2734
Jul-00
3240
Jan-00
2566

Facility Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. NC0001210
Domestic Flow
65 employees @ 25 al/ arson/shift
Flow: 0.001625 MGD
Parameter
Standard (mg/1)
Mthly ave Daily max
Load (lb/day)
Mthly ave Daily max
BOD
30
45
0.411
0.61
TSS
301
45
0.411
0.61
Production Information
Effluent Guideline section: 410.50 Subpart E Knit R
Production units as per EG Ib/1000 lb
Monthly average 3.974 Ib/1000 lb
Daily maximum 4.77 Ib/1000 lb
BPT or BAT
Parameter
Guideline limit
Daily max Mthly ave
Allowable Load (Ib/d)
Daily max Mthly ave
BPT (410.52)
BOD
5
2.5
23.85
9.935
TSS
21.8
10.9
103.986
43.3166
BAT(410.53,a)
COD
60
30
286.2
119.22
Sulfides
0.2
0.1
0.954
0.3974
Phenols
0.1
0.05
0.477
0.1987
Tot Chromium
0.1
0.05
0.477
0.1987
BAT(410.53,b)
COD
20
101
95.4
39.74
Limits (�ro?osed)
Parameter
Daily max
(lb/d)
Mthly ave
(lb/d)
BOD
24.46
10.34
TSS
104.60
43.72
COD
381.60
158.96
Sulfides
0.954
0.3974
Phenols
0.477
0.1987
Tot Chromium
0.477
0.1987
Previous Limits
Parameter
Daily max
(Ib/d)
Mthly ave
(lb/d)
BOD
28.50
14.25
TSS
124.26
62.13
COD
342
171
Sulfides
1.14
0.57
Phenols
0.57
0.28
Tot Chromiumi
0.571
0.28

dux=dEx�dExa
�_
o�z-:
<
a
n
<
m
n
3
<
m
n
d
A�
m
Q
m
TI
m
d
d
d
00
N
3�
I
m
E
F
m
F
E
m
H
O
m
T
O
OO
Z
tZnn
o
m
m
F
O
O
0
n
w
000
000
00
O
C
i
m
n-O
A
O
m
m
m
p
+
N
N
W
+
V
G
A
m
W
W
0
(OT
oQ
a
vc
III
u
w
m
oni
oai
1
N
m
p
tWp
m
p
A
p
W
N
n
p
O
b
W
V
W
N
A
W
N
-W'
O
INO
V
ONl
N
A
N
N
0
0
W
V
W
W
A
W
N+
O
(O
W
V
W
W
A
W
N+
II
II
m
W
O
r
n
R
n
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f3
b
m
PnPnPnPnPnPnSiPiiPiiPiisiPii$iPiiPiiPiiPiiPiiSiPiiPiiPiifii�PisPnPnPnR.PiiPiiPiiPnPnPnP.+oPnB�ai�iP..�>�r
�'
3
c
A
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
n
n
AAA
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
o
N
A
n
n
0
q0q
w
m
v
J
J
J
S
J
J
6
p
o
A
A
a
is
3
o
Q
<
d
n
m
�
O
W
C
m
c
n
n
m
o
W
F
�
u
000
atop
�
O
O+
N
0
O
N
W
N
J
V
V
A
d
d
a;
p
A
p
fJ
A
N
p
p
O
W
mt
W
W
W
V
W
W
W
W
W
A
W
W
W
N
W
W
O
N
t0
N
W
N
V
N
W
N
W
N
A
N
W
N
N
N
N+
O
W
W
J
W
W
A
W
N+
O
W
W
V
W
W
A
W
N+
7
II
II
o
n
o0
00
0
0
0
0
00
�88888888800000
000
00
Opp
oIS
r
o3
T
o
000000000000000088
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
PPP
88oOo0o
oao
o0
880
o0o
W
A
N
N
W
N
N+
W W
N
N
N
N
W
A
N
A
N
V
A
(Oil
W
P
N
N
W
4t
W
W
N
N
N
W
tOit
m
O
ma
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
Op
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OP
O
O
'op
C
d
O
Q
`n
p
p
p
SS
pOp
p
p
p
p
p
Q
d
W
W
Gt
d
T<
N
m
r
m
(mF
F
n
O
m
o
II
W
O
O
O
OO
O
m
(p
O
O
W
N
VV
V
V
V
j
6
6
6
y
m
N
y
A
m
N�
L
O
b
m
V
T
fWil
(J
A
W
N
�+
O
�l
)O
ONo
NV
ONi
tNit
P
Ei
AAll
N
C
O
tO
W
J
W
W
A
W
N+
O
t0
W
V
W
W
A
W
N+�
Ila
II
O
�
0
00000
g
8
g
g
g
000000
H
H
H
0
0
S
00
88800
H
00
0
0
0p0p
0000
88888888
po
0
880
p0
00
0000
ool
88
0_
m
O
t0
N
N+
N
W
(T
U�
W
4Ni
(!t
4Ni
O
V
A
O
N
O
N
N
(T
(lt
S
0
0
N
0
W+
0
0
W+
S
O
IJ
N
N
N
N
H
W
O
A
P
HJ
(T
O
�J
H
H
H
H
N-
AW
O
8
O
O
O
O
O
A
A
A
A
A
A
O
O
S
AA
O
O
O
S
O
S
O
O
O
p
O
O+
O
A
A
A
A
O
S88Q
O
O
88
O
8
O
O
O
OE
8
G
Q
t0
S
N
S
N+
O
S
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
W
o
S
W
S
W
S
V
p
S
O
N
O
N
O
W
O
W++
O
S
O
O
O
O
W
O
8
N
8
Vt
S
(ll
8
!lt
8
!T
W
G
()t
}Q{$p
W
�PKR
Ono=
F
x
x
.00
C
00
m
o
W
F
F
II
+
O
0
000
m
W
u
O
$
WW
o
o
a
c
W
vov
nnn

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary January 18, 2001
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
YEAR JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SE],
OCT
NOV
DEC
MO lndaslrles Peon 24hr lVfac her: W. 0hd
v I", _
_
Pau
-
-
Pe
-
-
Fe
-
-
Pre
NCIIIRI0311MI Begm:ID119'M Predate,Q + MaNuns'Dec
NonComp: Single
Im -
-
Pa.
-
-
Par
-
-
Pre
-
-
Pe
County: Trnmylvenia Region'. ARO Suebal FRB01
tugs -
_
Pax
-
-
Paw
-
-
Pe
-
-
ew1Ve
PP 0.030 Saurian
2" -
-
Pax
-
-
Pe
-
-
NgrPas,
-
-
Paw
7Q10: 279 IWC(%)..t7 Order
3001
Manor. W WTP Perm eW lam 90`.
Y 199, Pau
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pe
-
-
Fare
-
_
NCM31474M] Begin:41111996 Froqurcy: QPT + Jon Apr Jul Der
N..Comp. Single
'No Paw
-
-
Pass
-
-
raga
-
-
Pe
-
-
County: Alumwce Rceaon: WSRO Subbaem: CPF02
IM Paw
-
-
Pe
-
-
Pe
-
-
Pe
-
-
PF:2S sm.
2W11 Pax
-
-
Pr
-
-
Page
-
-
Paw
-
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100 a.
2001
Meld Industries PERM 4&HR LC50 AC LIM: 7M(GRAB)
Y Lear live
021
-12.5
Baal
a12.5
.125
-125
a12.5
.Ili
.125
.125
a25
NCM57819IMI Rossini Frequency QINF + Marlun SePDOC
NoriComP: SINGLE
I9M .12.6
.125
.12.5
02.5
IF]
.12.5
a2.5
-12.5
.12.5
.125
.125
025
Cecil McDowell Barren: ARO Started.: Cf610
tale 12.4,0.5t
a125
Q1.5
.12.5
a125
-125
-25
-In
.13
05
.1.5
05
PP : 0.01 social SOC:3A9.1WI/2M04WLC50uc ii M(1.5.5.6.123ZI
2M0 a15
alS
06
a25
-25
.25
NR
H
H
N
N
7Q10: 2.0 IWC(%).0.77 Order:
M01
Miner appeals Co. Perm clr lam: 2.1%
sm -
Pam
Pass
--
Pass
-
-
Pe
-
-
Pe
-
NC002"8=1 Began V 111997 Fregwnry: Q PI + Feb May Aug Nov
+ NrComP:Smek
Lees -
Pass
-
Paes
-
-
Pm
-
-
Pe
-
Coumy: Rockingham Region: WSRO Scroll ROA03
1919 -
Pae
-
--
Pau
-
-
Poe
-
-
NRNae
-
Ple: 5.2 3{QW
2002 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
B,
-
Pont
Pars
7QI0: 311 IWCI%)151 Order
2001
Meckoville WWTP Bee Creek Pern cnr bon: 37°n
Y 1997 --
Pass
-
_
NRme
-
-
NR6r
NR
Pass
Pas
--
NCW50901N101 Begin: 1/1/20110 Fraqurnry: Q P1F Feb May Aug No.
NeoCemP Single
IBM --
Pae
-
-
Peas
-
-
Paw
-
-
Pax
...
County Dan, Real. WSRO Subbaum YAM
1999 --
Pass
-
Pass
-
-
Pax
Pass
-
PP 025 Styr,
1000 _
Pew
-
.-.
Pax
...
_.
Pass
._
_.
NP
7010 U65 IWCIv'.197 Order
2001
Mackev111v W"Ir Dutch...', Cr. PERM CHR LIM T%
Y 1997 Paw
...
-
Pars
-
Fat
NRnar
NR
Pass
NCatl2141W 01 &gm711I994 Frgww'y Q PIF • Ian Apr Jul Get
Nonfor" SINGLE
r9M NR/P..
-
-
Pass
-
Pass
._
_.
Pas,
--
-
C'unnly Ouvw Region WSRO Sdrba n. YAMS
1999 Pass
-
-
Pam
_.
_.
Pass
-.
_.
Pass
...
...
Pp Ore s'mv„t
2000 Pe
-
-
Pass
...
-.
Pas
_.
Pau
_.
7QI01511 IWCP4651 ram.
21101
MpMKy 1"A7 Peem24WNrx Lim: 9oR
Plost Page
_.
Pax
...
...
Pax
-
_
Pars
_.
._
Pass
NC111NI1210tl101 Beyn2llll44fr Fnqueocy:Q + Marluns'Dce
NonCamp:St{k
sled —
—
Pax
Pau
_.
_-
Pas
—
._
Pax
County AWmawa Room WSRO Subleun: CPFN
nos —
--
Pax
-
-
Pau
Pax
—
--
Pau
PE 005 spout
200 -
-.
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
."ass
-
7QU) 47.8 IWC(%)0.16 art.:
Mgt
Mears WWTP PERM CHR LIM: WS.; PP NOT TO ERCEED I IMGD
1997 -
-
Pax
-
-
Pass
--
-
Pau.Pass
-
---
Pass
NCM24333MI Reganll UIS94 Fns,uodcy:QWF + Marlun ScPDec
NeaCmmP: SINGLE
19118 -
--
Pan
-
-
Pau
--
_
Pas
--
-
Pas
County: Union Region: MRO Subteen. YAD14
1999 -
-
Pau
-
-
Pax
-
-
Pas
-
...
Pau
PC : 90 Several
2t1M _
_
Pen
_
_
Pax
-
._
Pas
7QlW 041 IWC(%)51b.18 OrQr.
2111Yr
Meassate/001,0101 Perm24W p/faclim' W°.BMllcombircJ.ufirl)
Y 1le7 -
Pe
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pax
_.
Pas
NCM0571910132 Bcein:1JUIM Frequ,wy: QPT + Fcb May Aug Non
So.nCaugr Sugk
191111 -
Pe
-
-
Pass
--
-
Pass
--
-
Pas
-
County.CmMVWtd Bagel PRO Subba.in: CPF15
1999 -
Pass
-
-
Late
Pass
-.
I.,
Pass Pas
Pass
--
PP: L3 sryN
2032 -
Pas
-
-
Pam
Pass
-
--
Pass
7COM WIA IWC(%)015 Order
2001
Mean County WWII Perm c1r her 41%
Y 1w, —
—
Pe _
_
Pass _-
._Pass
1.11
NC0373081MI Begam WI12000 runpurny:Q Met nun S, Dee
Nonce"Smgle 1998 Pan
_.
Pax -
-
Pau _.
_
Pas
- - Pax
Crump Moore Reeton: FRO Substrate, LUMM
1999 -
-
Pao -
-
Pass --
-
Lone
Pan _- Pass
PP : 6.7 Spooner
2000 -
-
reason -
_.
Pass _.
._
Pas
- -
7QI0:15.2 IWC(%):-54 Omer
2001
MetrnNIH WWTIP PERM CHR LIM: 901.
Y r991 -
Pa.
- -
Pas
- -
Pau
-
- Pas -
NC0M67281001 Began: 1111119s Flegwrny. QP,T . Fob Me, Aug Nov
NonCo"SINGLE race -
Pass
- -
Pax
- --
Pass
-
- Pas -
Cwnty: louden Reiter: MRO S1Mem. YADI I
1991) -
Pass
- -
Pass
- -
ran
Frl
pas Pe -
PF:5.2 S,mal
?Pno -
Pass
-
pars
- -
Fan
+IW
�100 Pe
7010: 0.5 IWC(%1W Is Itder
2001
LEGEND.
PERM Pam.Rcgmnnlem LET-AJmmmranv Letre, Farad Fmwuau. Monnurmg frgwmry O-Ooareirly:M-Momhly:BM Rimomhlyy SA-ScPr.Pudlh'.A-Annually OWD}0nlyy when dsclurging:O-PaommueJ mmnonri nqutrcmao
Hcgin • Foo mnnlh reymnd 7QIU = Rccavmg.peer low One <n6mon I,fao qo ly nenesto, ruler 1a monlhly wren Nilure tar NR Momhn Ihanaung must wear - cx. Ian. Apr. Jul. Dell NouCOmp - C.. C.Mtowlee R,gennla,
PF - PcmmeiJ flow (MGD) W('. - hulneao wsac concenrnun PT • PaelFul Nm AC • Acute CHR - Chronic
D.I. Near".. f - Fronted Minnow. ° - Cencountmn y1. or, - My,d annex, (b% - Chronic valet: P Mortality of sated parernwge at Wghen ceneanaton. or Perf aPrPJ by DWD Aquatic Its Unit, to - Bad not
Rerun,, Nmauon.... - Dmu nor ngmred. NR Not ue,oned Rrnboy Atuen)Smas: 1. Inecea. N - Newly lestion To construct, H - Ama but net Jincharying; .Mon don mailable for month in gocuron. • • ORC ugnunm nmint
31

SG^Ar=p
Wier
<- — 36
000
G—G�
Flow .
So�eF:l+er' ao ual;za+ioN
Teak fle�•d+ION
- � Teak
—'` Recrrclafion Recirc)a+ieN
Oaf ItQuile
R mp
Zane eare a ION. --- lets .0
'Pam RcivrN $lodgeru
8S� gel.
/ I
12000y�•,,�' ., .
to• sr aa, IO'HP
I
r�
�J O�rrflolu ['
— Trou h 165�
00 1
1 S H � -- -�
SW
l
60000 gal.
. 1 II• I
Il
I
Fioa f-- 36 8500, ya1.
paer I I li
I I
ar + Screens ----Tr----
TwnK rryy
. 16 .r18Nf•
' Domeshia Sawa e
R�ehcWse Wafer yOfN
Nolo)In9 -
aLzaflor
rao�_
GItVBflb
Ouflefs

05/03/2001 ee:29 MONRRCH HOSIERY 4 19197330719 N0.294 D02
rI 1 17
1
i
PRODUCTION SUMMARY
Nighest'8ingld-D"=d
in Thousands
Praducdon Averages.
(in Thousands ot_ Pounds)
7
: e.'J.
:R..'J'i47i�i:'••�SF .�eioG...
Year 1999
Y .:.'�ry..'.Y_"�t�'�i i �"S.r'.
.K ^' X:Tv..ICb'� •+v
Januar
'
February
March
A ril
Ma
June
July
Amin
se tamber
October
November
December
`
•�iy-1'1'Y�[, Il Y I. i.'i
i.l.. H• J�.-�' A 'Js 'N
Year 2000
• irr'i$� 7'�4`•nU :d w�,+,.4vi �?5: IA.., iy "-1V
. -�`Y. � .d. :A,✓ is 7- 'v
January
Frbrua
March
and
!O
April
4P
Ma
June
691S
so2
JUIV
.3_7
*
August
>
.29al`
se tember
jgo
October
,3/.0`1
9S. 9
November
310919112
SqG
December
3GJ
1� rW)
Date: Cs -el/

03/27/2001 08:21 MONARCH HOSIERY i 19197330719
- 919 733 0419 Feb 22 01 11:46
Fax:[phone]
PRODUCTION SUMMARY
Signature: G� Title: 0���
NO.075
P.01/02
I
i
I

0327/2001 2e:21 MONARCH HOSIERY 4 19197330719
NO.075 o01
MONARCH ®SIERYMILLS, INC.
JG(anufaaltuu o f ���liy dEosleey foe fiu �isE(as �am71y,•
P.O.DON 1205
eall'mgton, NO 27216-12.05
FAX 336.5U-036S _
I`icn>'-trR
Ms. Tereea Rodriguez
2724 Ossipas Front St.
Allamahaw, NO 27202-0247
Phona:330-58°W301
1'80"34.5168
March 26, 2001
Dear Ms, Rodriguez, L} -
We are £finalizing plane for a new auatomer:uko,will add
3.40 lbs. of goods! par 'day on a 5'day weelc. Please -Allow for
this increase for our new permit.
Sincerely,
�r- --- -
Xtml
Mr. Riohard C. Keziah
Prooident
Monarch Hosiery Wills, Ync.
•f

t
03/,05/2001 11:08 MONa2CH HOSIERY 4 19197330719 NO.923 PM
gig
ax 919-7
rY.DEI�Gi-oilio 33-0719 Feb 22 '01 11:46 P.01/02
�yj,�l�' ` 7 DAYS A WEEK
�V_ 1 PARTS & SERVICE - 24 HOURS A DAYS �nC.
Lev"s Boiler Supply
1,&vds Boiler Service Co.
NATI-goo52g TOLL -FREE
7Ye4r
signature:
Date:
P.O. Box 13229 Greensboro, NC 27415.3229 Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
t

BILL HOLMAN
�. SECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
September 28, 2000 RECEIVED
Mr. Richard C. Kezieh
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, N.C. 27216
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0001210
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Kezieh:
JAN 3 1 lUUI
WATER QUALITY SECTION
- --harp Compliance Enf.
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed on the wastewater
treatment system serving Monarch Hosiery Mills by Mike Mickey and Corey
Basinger of this office on September 24, 2000. Mr. Neal Moore, ORC, was
present for the inspection. This type of inspection consists of two basic parts:
an in -office review of facility files and self -monitoring data; and an on -site
inspection of the facility.
A review of the self monitoring forms submitted for the period January
2000 through July 2000 showed that all of the required data was recorded and
submitted per the frequencies specified in the permit. In regards to compliance
with effluent limits, an evaluation of the effluent data for the same time period
revealed complete compliance with all monthly average and daily maximum
permit limits (See data summary attached).
Our office appreciates the efforts of Monarch Hosiery Mills to comply
with the NPDES permit. Should you have any questions concerning this report,
please contact Mike Mickey or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
WSRO
SRS WAVGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APiIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Monarch Hosiery Mills WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO0O121O
Self Monitoring Data Summary
January 2000 - July 2000
Parameters
Monthly Avg.
Permit Limits
Monthly Avg. Limit
Violations per DMR
Daily Maximum
Permit Limit
Daily Max. Limit
Violations per DMR
Flow (MGD)
0.45
None
NA
BOD (Ibs/day)
14.25
None
28.50
None
TSS (Ibs/day)
62.13
None
124.26
None
Sulfides (Ibs/day)
0.57
None
1.14
None
Chromium (Ibs/day)
0.28
None
0.57
None
COD (Ibs/day)
171
None
342
None
Phosphorus (mg/1)
2.0'
None
NA
Toxicity (acute)
P/F 90%
None
-
NA
Phenols Ibs/da)
0.28
None
0.57
None
'Quarterly average limit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Neil Moore
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, NC 27216
e
NCDENR
NORTM CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 22, 2000
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit NC0001210
Monarch Hosiery Mills
Alamance County
The Division is beginning the cycle of permit renewals for the Cape Fear river basin. An examination of the Cape
Fear basin plan and the NPDES permit schedule has revealed that the existing expiration dates in Cape Fear NPDES
permits do not coincide with the revised permit expiration dates for the basin. This discrepancy could create unnecessary
delays in the processing of over 200 permit renewals. Accordingly, the Division is changing the permit expiration dates for
NPDES permits in the Cape Fear river basin.
This permit modification changes the expiration date of the subject permit in subbasin 30602 to May 31, 2001. Please
find enclosed the revised permit cover page. Insert the new cover page into your permit and discard the old page. All
other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification
is issued under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
In accordance with the modification of the permit expiration date, the new due date for your renewal application is
December 2, 2000. Renewal application forms will be sent to you approximately 6-8 weeks in advance of the new due
date or you may download the forms from the NPDES web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents.htnil.
You will need to download Standard Form C. If you have already submitted a permit renewal form, there is no need to
submit any other forms to the Division; the application will be processed during the renewal period for your subbasin.
If any part of this permit modification are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions concerning this permit modification, please contact Natalie Sierra at [phone],
extension 551.
Sincerely,
11o�
Kerr T. Stevens/
CC: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VISIT us ON THE INTERNET @ http:/fn2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

Permit NC0001210
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Monarch Hosiery Mills
NCSR 1558
Altamahaw
Alamance County
to receiving waters designated as Reedy Fork Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2000.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2001.
Signed this day September 22, 2000.
Kerr T. Stevens, l5irector
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

WDES'Perfi7it Rioting Work Street
NPDES No.: lAli GI
❑ RegularAdditton
❑' n DistretfoaayAddkion
❑' Sco'e chsnye, but no:,
statuschange
Deletion
Facility Name:
An
�IT'
City: I P I US �I / I& O I=O I ^i� IIi_I_II/VI GI_I_I_I '
Receiving Water: l/\ I CI AID l Y I'
irl
Reach Number. 1_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I
/s this facility a steam electric power plant (SIC=4911) Is this permit for a munldpal separate storm sewer
with one or more of the following characteristics? serving a population greater than 100,0007
1. Power output 500 MW or greater (not using a coding pond lake)
1. A nuclear power plant ❑ YES; score is 700 (stop here)
3. Cooling water discharge greater than 25%of the receiving stream's 7QI0 flow rate X NO (continue)
❑ YES; score is 600 (stop here) A NO (continue)
FACTOR 1: Toxic Pollutant Potential
PCs SIC Code: I-Z�611 PrimarySIC Code: I Z I Z-1 611,
Other SIC Codes: 1 21 Z 1 l I ?-q1 1_I_I_I_I
Industrial Subcategory Code: 16 1 Q ZI (Code 000 if no subcategory)
Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A. Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one)
Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ No process
waste streams
❑ I.
❑ 2.
Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ 3. 3 15 ❑ 7. 7
0 0 ❑ 4. 4 20�❑{{ B. B
1 5 ❑ S. 5 25 rC1, 9. 9
2 10 ❑ 6. 6 30 10
FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream Flow Volume (Corniolete eBherSectfonA orSodlon B; check only one)
Section A —Wastewater Flow Only Considered Section B Wastewater and Stream Fbw Consider
Wastewater Type
Code
Points
Wastewater Type
Percent of Instream
Code
Points
(See Instructions)
(See Instructions)
Wastewater Concen-
Type I: Flow <5 MGD
❑
11
0
[ration at Receiving
Flow 5 to 10 MGD
❑
12
10
Stream law Flow
Flow >10 to 50 MGD
❑
13
20
Flow> 50 MGD
❑
14
30
TYPE I/III:
<10% ❑
41
0
Type II: Flow <1 MGD
❑
21
10
a 10% to <50% ❑
42
10
Flow 1 to 5 MGD
❑
22
20
Flow >5 to 10 MGD
Cl
23
30
2 50% ❑
43
20
Flow >10 MGD
❑
24
50
.
Type II:
< 10%
51
0
Type III: Flow <1 MGD
❑
31
0
Flow 1 to 5 MGD
❑
32
10
2 10% to <50% ❑
52
20
Flow>5 to 10 MGD
❑
33
20
Flow >10 MGD
❑
34
z0
250% ❑
53
30
'Code Checked from Section
A or 0:
1 SI I 1
.
' Total Points Factor 2:
1_1 01

NPDES Permit Rating"Work Sheet
FACTOR 3:�Conventional Pollutants NPDES No.: I Al 1 6- 10 16 I D 111 Z I�I 0 I
(only when limited by the permit)
A. Oxygen Demanding Pollutant: (check one) )4BOD ❑ COD ❑
Code
Points
Permit Limits: (check one) ❑
<100 lbs/day
1
0
100 to 1000 lbs/day
2
5
❑
>1000 to 3000 lbs/day
3
15
❑
>30001bs/day
4
20
Code Checked:.'YJ
::
Points Scored:- I d I
B. Total Suspended Solids (FSS)
Code
Points
Permit Umits: (check one) ❑
<100 lbs/day
1
0
100 to 1000 lbs/day
2
5
❑
>1000 to 5000 lbs/day
3
15
❑
>5000 lbs/day
4
20
.` Code Checked: 1
..
_
...
r2-1
Points Scored: 1 b7•"? I
C. Nitrogen Pollutant: (check one) ❑ Ammonia Other: , V O&15-
Permit Limits: )2r,
Nitrogen Equiwlent
Code
Points
(check one)
<300 lbs/day
1
0
❑
300 to 1000 lbs/day
2
S
❑
>1000 to 3000 lbs/day
3
15
❑
>3000 lbs/day
4
20
...
,..
Code Checked• I '� I'
Pants Scored: l_I�I
Total Points Factor 3 II -OI
FACTOR 4: Public Health Impact
Is there a public drinking water supply located within 50 miles downstream of the effluent discharge (this Includes any body of
water to which the receiving water Is a tributary)7 A public drinking water supply may Include infiltration galleries, or other
methods of conveyance that ultimately get water from the above referenced supply.
)KYFS (If yes, check toxicity potential number below)
❑ NO (If no, go to Factor 5)
Determine the human health toxicity potential from Appendix A. Use the same SIC code and subcategory reference as In Factor 1. (Be
sure to use the human health toxicity group column — check one below)
Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ No process ❑ 3. 3 0
waste streams 0 0 4. 4 0
❑ 1. 1 0 ❑ S. 5 5
❑ 2. 2 0 ❑ 6. 6 10
Toxicity Group Code Points
7. 7 15
❑ 8. 8 20
❑ 9. 9 25
❑ 10. 10 t300
Cade Number Checked: 161 f 1
Tatal Points Factor 4: 1151
2

NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
FACTOR 5: Wafer Quality Factors / NPDFS No.: IU I C I D I I ©ILIZ I(1 d 1
A. Is (or will) one or more of the effluent discharge limits based on water quality factors'"of the recelving stream (rather than
technology -based federal effluent guidelines, or technology -based state effluent guidelines), or has a wasteload allocation V-11,
been assigned to the discharge?
Code Points
X Yes 1 10
❑ No 2 0
B. Is the receiving water In compliance with applicable water quality standards for pollutants that are water quality limited in
the pennit7 — -
Code Points
Yes 1 0
❑ No 2 5
C. Does the effluent discharged from this facility exhibit the reasonable potential to violate water quality standards due to whole
effluent toxicity?
Code Points
Yes 1 10
❑ No 2 0
..Code Number Checked:. Af i I C,
f.
Points Factor . A I I I . + C LI I � TOTAt
FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters Brij0 1 fa-17 /((B&
A. Base Score: Enter flow code here (from Factor 2): 151 1 1 Enter the multiplication factor that corresponds
to the flow code: 16 1+ I I
Check appropriate facility HPRI Code (from PCS):�
HPRI N Code HPRI Score
❑ 1 1 20
❑ 2 2 0 r/lL
❑ 3 3 30
❑ 4 4 0
❑ 5 5 20
HPRI code checked: 1 1
Base Score: (HPRI Score) x (Muldpiicadon Factor)
Flow Code Multiplication Factor
11, 31, or 41
0.00
12, 32, or 42
0.05
13, 33, or 43
0.10
14 or 34
0.15
21 or 51
0.10
22 or 52
0.30
23 or 53
-
0.60
24
1.00
(TOTAL POINT5)
B. Additional Points— NEP Program C. Additional Points— Great Lakes Area of Concern
For a facility that has an HPRI code of 3, does the facility For a facility that has an HPRI code ofS, does the facility
discharge to one of the estuaries enrolled In the National discharge any of the pollutants of concern Into one of the
Estuary Protection (NEP) program (see Instructions) or Great Lakes' 31 areas of concern (see Instructions)
the Chesapeake Bay?
3

NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
SCORE SUMMARY
II
NPDES No.: I,4A CI d 1 01 6111 ZI
Factor
Description
Total Points
1
Toxic Pollutant Potential
2
Flow/Stmamflow Volume
0
3
Conventional Pollutants
0
4
Public Health Impacts
5
Water Quality Factors
6
Proximity to Near Coastal Waters
TOTAL (Factors 1 through 6)
�=
SI. Is the total score equal
to or greater than 80? Kes (Facility is a maim) ❑ No
S2. If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major?
❑ No
❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below:
Reason:
NEW SCORE:
OLD SCORE
Permit Reviewer's Name
( IN) 5-03
Phone Number
71F-00
Date
4

06/20/2000 11:32 MONARCH HOSIERY 4 19197330719
NO.059 001
Pn Rnw 1A05
gurnngton,NC Y721A�17nh
r..x oaa inn alga
MONARCH HOSIIirRY MILLS, INC.
"dYlanu%mlaturs of f3w%ihj dloamy fos 44 6df%g 94ndy„
FAX COVER SHEET
DATF:
To. GJh►ltc�5>[
FROM: eic o
2729 Ossipne Front St.
Alleiialiaw. NO M09-OC47
alone' jib-004-036i
1^/ry11-1.W0100
IF TOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS FAX CALL: 3364044NI
FAX TELEPHONE NUMBER: 336-6W366
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER LETTER: S
MESSAGE'
r z
`7

06/20/2000 11:32 MONARCH HOSIERY 4 19197330719
NO.059 D02
1b ONARU,H HOSIERY MILLS, INC.
:V W ' f'dwl ss Vf wafa1y As1asy `os i9a Enuv 9-6
i< mstraown'40
wnmpwn, 14 64aL6 t1koa
FAX 330•3C14-03CE
a
TO, Mr, Charles Weaver
FROM: Neil Moore
DATE: 6-20-00
one Monarch Road
nnmmmhaw, NL: 27202.0247
rmue, aax•aa+'vw•
t•600.7Si•3toe
According to your definitions and fee Schedule sheets, our
facility should be changed to a Minor facility because we are
permitted for less than one (1) million gallons per day. Also,
mlr brae chnuld nnlv he $716 A 9Qr Year. Could you please cnange
our facility status in your computer system to Minor Facility.
1hdnkIny yuu !n udranLt,
Neil Moerr.

06202000 11:32 MONARCH HOSIERY 4 19197330719 NO.059
--..._. •
E.
NORTH CAROLINA 00PANTINENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL ROSOURCES
v�z',� �t' INVOICE
w, Annual PerMlt FOB
This annual fee is required by the North Carolina Administrative Code. It covers the administrative costs
associated with your permit. It is required of'any person holding a permit for any time during the annual fee
period, regardless of the facility's operating status, Failure to pay the fee by the due date will subject the
permit to revocation. Operating without a valid permit is a violation and is subject to as 10,000 per day fine_
if the permit is revoked and you later decide a permit is needed, you most reapply, with the understanding the
permit request may be denied due to changes in environmental, regulatory, or modeling conditions.
t+ermfr. hhtmhur: NG6nA149 0 Annual ii PP. PP.rind: 5//12000 to 4/3012001
Inrulvm Dula• J.ina 7-0, 0000
Nti� mi.,, inr chin TIntar Juiv 14.200n
MONARCH HOSIERY MII I S, INC, pptn,uul Fumy 9389�•�
P. O• pox 1 VMS
BURLINGTON NC 27216
Notes,
d. n J'k''-1"g Y'Y"`^"'•"C 1`•"' "' •tl LL+ ■aAognd rnr rn„„no,t ,•t in ! o in nrznrdnnoo with thy 1'lo(n' f'aMlma
General Statute 25-3-512,
.s., Nap-t'uyumu,l ,.L1uis frA by the pp1y1mnt due date win Initiate the permit revocation process.
3. Remit payment to:
NCDRNR -Division of Water Quality
1617 MaU Service Center
ftleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
4. Should you have any Questions regarding this invoice, please contact the Annual' Administering and
Compliance Fee Coordinator at 919-733-5083 extension 210.
........................................... ..... .I.....1.,,....,1......1....-,,,,...I..,,,...,........,...I.I........% 11..-• , . , I..,,. I.......
permit Number: MC0001210
NEIL MOORE
MONARCH HOSIRRY MILLS, INC.
p. 0. BOX 1205
BURLINGTON NC 27216
ANNUAL PeRmI ' INVOICE
(Retum This Portion With Check)
Annual Fee Periods
Invoice note:
Don Dates
Annual Few
Check Number:
511/2000 to 4130/2001
Juno 14, 2000
Inly 1 a. onnn
$2865.00

08/20/2000 11:32 MONARCH HOSIERY 19197330719 NO.059 PO4
JUN 10 '55 1V7:eb"-1
t?e;
I Refer to definitions page for specific descriptions of each aclivltY Category-
2 For new permit requests under activities listed in Category A, a fee eqquivelong to the corresponding annual
fee asthe
is
required. This fee is non-refundable if the permit request is denied. If the permit is granted, this fee appli
ounuol r-b for the firrt Year attar permit Knuance.
This t'ae is non-refundable if the Permit request is denied. A major modification shall be defined as one that
results n a the
the rearaste sPoisuof itl load,
waste gene in a
ai significant
gnlncant relocation of the dlscnarga point. or
a These fees shall be in addition to the associated annual fso as listed under Category A.
This lee is non-refundable it the permit request is denied.

Definitions
Activ<!y
(Category A)
®otinitlon
Ntajarindvwaal NPOES Permits
> t.0 miltiongallons per day. hidostdeswith Pugh toxic pclential, munici;waies with preliesiment
programs and municipal slormwater permits
Minor Individual NPOES Permits
< 1.0 million gallons per day. lndusiries with Inv toxicc potential, municipafil'mes, small domestic waste
facilities and bneusbial stormwater permits.
Single remily Residences
All individual systems covered underNPQES General Peirnit Ntunber NCG550000 and imn-
discharge single Family residenlial systems.
StorrmfraterandWastewatwDischarge General Permits
Factgliescoveredunder stale -wide General NFDES Permits. Common examples include: mine
devralering, cooling water, vehicle maintenance activities, etc.
Recycle Systems
Most he complete dosed-ioop recycle system.
38,591) to 99.999 Steady State Live Weight
Aramal Permits (Small Operations)
Animat Permits. (Medium Operations)
100,000 to 79R.999 Steady Stale Uve Weight
Animal Permits (Large Operations)
n 800,000 Steady Stale Live Weight
Nondscharge Major Perm is
> 10,000 gallons per day or > 300 aces of land requved.
Nondischarge afmorPemil .
< 10,000 gallons per day or < 309 acres of land required.
dclreiPy '
{category 6)
Definition
Spedal Order by Consent— Mlor
Refer locat"oriesdescribed above forMa)ar facilities.
Special Order by Consent— Minor
Refer to categories described above for Minor facilities.
Act'lany
{CaEegoly C)
Defin34len.
Collection system consimcfion or eAension 10an existing system.
Sewer Exiensians
Stale Stormwalef
All new development fir the ZO coastal cotinlfes- New develepmentlacaled thr"houi Ike state
near designated sensitive waleis ( e. High Quafilly Wafers. Outslanding Resource Waleis)
Water Quality Certrmalians—Major
> 1.0 acrewetlandfill, > 150feel stream impacts
Water Quality Cerdiicalians—Minor
< 1.0 axtewelland fill, a 150ferl stream impacts
Pelratearn Contaminated Sails
Removal, treatment and disposal ofpetrcleurri-contaminated soils.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Neil Moore
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, North Carolina 27216
L
� FE F?L
December 27, 1995
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0001210
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Moore:
In accordance with the application for a discharge permit received on May 22, 1995 the Division is
forwarding herewith the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina
and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and riled with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is
made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the requirements to be
followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by
the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Jeanette Powell at telephone number
[phone],extension 537.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mr, Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Permits and Engineering Unit
Facilities Assessment Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 101/6 post -consumer paper

Permit No. NC0001210
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
One Monarch Road
Altamahaw
Alamance County
to receiving waters designated as Reedy Fork Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, and III hereof.
The permit shall become effective February 1, 1996.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on January 31, 2001.
Signed this day December 27, 1995.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NC0001210
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.05 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of bar
screens, an aerated holding tank, pre - aeration basin, aeration tank, clarifier, holding tank and
sand filter located at Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc., One Monarch Road, Altamahaw, Alamance
County (See Part III of this Permit), and
2 Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Reedy
Fork Creek which is classified Class C-NSW waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

V
7
V.
M in
M
���- ,� a, : o , ,,moo--- -.f •�,..
T
&
<
e
r
-V -
TO,
I sn
�500
L
C .0 C
-7
MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC. '002
7
Burlington, NC/Alamance County ?I F.:.
t1 Quad Name — Ossipee, C20 NE
Latitude: 360 101
3011
Longitude: 790 31' ()Off
Cape Fear River Basin %
Discharge from treatment works treatment works
into Reedy Fork Creek

A. O. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0001210
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) scrial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations
Monitoring
Requirements
Lbs/day Units (specify)
Measurement
Samole
*Sample
Mon. Avg. Daily Max Mon. Avg. Daily Max.
Frequency
Type
Location
Flow 0.050 MGD
Continuous
Recorder
E
BOD, 5 Day, 20 °C 14.25 28.50
Weekly
Composite
E, U, D
Total Suspended Residue 62.13 124.26
Weekly
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen (minimum)
Weekly
Grab
E,U,D
Sulfides 0.57 1.14
2/Month
Grab
E
Total Chromium 0.28 0.57
2/Month
Composite
E
COD 171.0 342.0
Weekly
Composite
E
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
E,U,D
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus 2.0 mg/I (+)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Conductivity
Weekly
Grab
U,D
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent, U - Upstream approximately 50 feet, D - Downstream at SR 1558
** Acute Toxicity ( Fathead Minnow 24 Hr), March, June, September and December, See Part III, Condition F.
(+) Compliance shall be based upon a quarterly average of weekly samples.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENT'S FINAL
Permit No. NC0001210
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. (Continued)
Effluent Characteristics -Discharge Limitations
Monitoring
Requirements
Lbs/day Other Units (specify)
Measurement
Sample
'Sample
Mon. Avg. Daily Max Mon. Avg. Daily Max.
Frequency
Type
Location
Acute Toxicity
Quarterly
Composite
E
Phenols 0.28 0.57
2/Month
Grab
E

Part III ' Permit No. NC0001210
E. Nutrient Condition for Permits with Phosphorus Limits
This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to change the effluent limitation on nutrients
for this discharge depending upon the following:
1. The findings of a study by the Division of Environmental Management determine nutrient
control is necessary.
2. Local actions do not successfully reduce the nutrient loading on the receiving waters.
3. The onset of problem conditions in the receiving waters.
F. ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute
Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration. The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality
is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for
self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit
during the months of March, June, September December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

tot 6kT
add eab "Iinrt 2
2P u.k t. Loocof
A� -lo!�7
r.
to
c�
�P-Az2
a.cc-

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0001210
PERMITI'EE NAME: Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Hosiery Mill
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Minor q
0.05 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: Reedy Fork Mk
Jvd�w.
dapa�-�
4
ftm '
ltJ C3/0.
Class: C-NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-06-02
Reference USGS Quad: C20NE (please attach)
rnrtnrv- Alamance
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 01/31/96 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
no change in Reedy Fork Creek
Requested by:,
Prepared by:
Reviewed byre(- Z.,f
kzw Gl S�—
Jeanette Powell W Date: 07/26/95
�= Date: zvrro-
D
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
:,
33
Drainage Area (mi2): 255 Average Streamfbw (cts): 229
s7010 (cfs): 47.8 w7010 (cts): 60.8 30Q2 (cts): -
Toxicity Limits: Acute (Fathead Minnow, 24 hr) No Significant Mortality at 90%
March, June, September, and December
Upstream Location: approximately 50' above outfall
Downstream Location: SR 1558
Parameters: temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity
Mo.,rel y
Daily Maximum
YrAverage
Flow (mgd):
0.050
BOD5 (lbs/day):
25
8.34
TSS (lbs/day):
109
36.34
pH (SU):
6-9
COD (lbs/day):
320
106.69
Total Chromium (ibs/day):
0.50
0.17
Sulfides (lbs/day):
1.00
0.33
Phenols (lbs/day):
0.50
0.17
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/I):
monitor
Temperature (° C):
monitor
Total Nitrogen i No, . No, . nw ) (mg/l):
monitor
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
2.0'
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other
than trace amounts.
Quarterly average based on weekly
samples.
PI nTT EID

Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc. EFFLUENT GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS
NC0001210
Type of Product Produced
Daily Max
1000 lb/day
Mo. Avg.
1000 lb/day
Effluent Guideline Reference
Knit Fabric Finishing - Synthetic
4
2.667
40 CFR 410, Subpart E
Knit Fabric Finishing - N/S Blend--
1.
0.667
40 CFR 410, Subpart E
5poo 5.3�4
Effluent Parameter
EPA Limitations in 40 CFR
Ibs/1000 Ibs ofproduct)
EffluentLlmits
Ibs/day)
Comments
Footnote
Daily Max
30 day avg.
Daily Max
30 daV avg.
BOD5
5.00
2.50
25.00
8.34
BPT, 40 CFR 410.52(a)
TSS
21.80
10.90
109.00
36.34
BPT, 40 CFR 410.52(a)
pH
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
BPT, 40 CFR 410.52(a),
COD
60.00
30.00
300.00
100.02
BPT, 40 CFR 410.52(a)
COD
20.00
10.00
20.00
6.67
BPT, 40 CFR 410.52(b)
1
COD (cumulative)
320.00
106.69
Sulfide
0.20
0.10
1.00
0.33
BAT, 40 CFR 410.53(a)7
Phenols
0.10
0.05
0.60
0.17
BAT, 40 CFR 410.53(a) )
Total Chromium
0.10
0.05
0.50
0.17
BAT, 40 CFR 410.53(a) Jl
NOTES:
The facility performs only simple knit fabric finishing manufacturing operations and is not a 'commission finishing" facility.
Conventional parameters are determined using BPT. Non -conventional parameters are determined using BAT per DEM policy.
FOOTNOTES:
1 Additional allocation attributable to finishing of knit fabrics through simple manufaturing operations and employing
a natural and synthetic fiber.

RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNA
AIJG 15 10
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 8334
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Incorporated
NC0001210
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Stream Characteristic:
Reedy Fork Creek
USGS #
C NSW
Date:
03-06-02
Drainage Area (mi2):
Alamance
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winston - Salem
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Powell
Average Flow (cfs):
7 / 26 / 95
30Q2 (cfs):
C 20 NE
1WC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Production rates: Daily Maximum Monthly Average
Knit Fabric Finishing - Synthetic 4,000 lbs/day 2,667 lbs/day
Knit Fabric Finishing - N/S Blend 1,000 lbs/day 667 lbs/day
(previous permit based on 6,2W lbs/day)
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
255
47.8
60.8
229
0.16 %
Phenols limit, (as required by CFR) was inadvertently omitted from last permit; will be
recommended for this permit renewal.
From November, 1993 through March, 1994, DMR's indicate facility was in violation of BODS
limit as well as COD violations for February and March, 1994. Toxicity test failures and problems
accompany these periods.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Instream Assessment: 6'ahCIA . M0,
Regional Supervisor: ID
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: 3 E P 0 8 1995
0
0

r
2
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Type of Toxicity Test: Acute (Fathead Minnow, 24 hr)
Existing Limit: No Significant Mortality at 90%
Recommended Limit No Significant Mortality at 90%
Monitoring Schedule: March, June, September, and December
Existing Limits
Daily Maximum
Monthly Average
Flow (mgd):
0.050
BOD5 (lbs/day):
28.5
14.25
TSS (lbs/day):
124.26
62.13
pH (SU):
6-9
COD abs/day):
342
171
Total Chromium pbs/day):
0.57
0.28
Sulfides abs/day):
1.14
0.57
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
monitor
Temperature (° C):
monitor
Total Nitrogen [ NO2 + NO3 + TKN ] (mg/1):
monitor
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
2.0 *
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Quarterly average based on weekly samples
Recommended Limits
Daily Maximum
Monthly Average WQ / EL
Flow (mgd):
0.050
BOD5 (lbs/day):
25
8.34
EL
TSS (lbs/day):
109
36.34
EL
pH (SU):
6-9
COD (lbs/day):
320
106.69
EL
Total Chromium abs/day):
0.50
0.17
EL
Sulfides (lbs/day):
1.00
0.33
EL
Phenols abs/day):
0.50
0.17
EL
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
monitor
Temperature (° C):
monitor
Total Nitrogen [ NO2+NO3+TKN ] (mg/1):
monitor
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
2.0 *
WQ
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Quarterly average based on weekly samples
Parameters) Affected Limits Changes Due To:
BOD5, TSS, COD, Total Chromium, Sulfides changes in production rates
Phenols
omitted from previous permit, (refer cover)
_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: approximately 50' above outfall
Downstream Location: SR 1558
Parameters: Temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Has the facility deTptstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes t.- No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No _i.z
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling analysisif
modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

FacilityName Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inca Permit # NC0001210 Pipe # 001
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarrerjy basis using protocols defined in the North
Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A
Single Effluent Concentration." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Dime hn ales
romelas 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour composite. The effluent concentration
at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90 % (defined as treatment two in the North
Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed after thirty
days from the effective date of this permit during the months of March, June, September, and
December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring
will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may
be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will
constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
47.8 cfs
Permitted Flow
0.050 MGD
IWC
0.16 %
Basin & Sub -basin
03-06-02
Receiving Stream
Reedy Fork Creek_
County
Alamance
QAL• PlF Fathead 24 Version 9191
Recommended by:
Date

NPDeS Permit Reiii i-Work Sheet
SCORE SUMMARY NPDES No.: &L I0 I 10 I-LLILI�
Factor Description Total Points
1 Toxic Pollutant Potential 5D
2 Flow/Stream8ow Volume �0
3 Conventional Pollutants
4 Public Health Impacts 215
—_5
5 Water Quality Factors —2-6
6 Proximity to Near Coastal Waters 0
TOTAL (Factors 1 throughh66) - `
51. Is the total score equal to or greater than 80? XYes (Facility is a major) ❑ No
S2. If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major?
❑ No
❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below:
Reason:
NEW SCORE:
OLD SCORE:
Permit Reviewer's Name
r , -
Phone Number
Gf

NPDES Perrr4tRating Work Sheet
FACTOR 5: Wafer Quality Factors ` NPDES No.: IV I C IQI V ��11
IQIlI ZI I I
A. is (or will) one or more of the effluent discharge limits based on water quality factors of the receiving stream (rather than
technology -based federal effluent guidelines, or technology -based state effluent guidelines), or has a wasteload allocation
been assigned to the d1scharge7
Code Points
Yes 1 10
❑ No 2 0
B. Is the receiving water In compliance with applicable water quality standards for pollutants that are water quality limited In
the permit? — -
Code Points
Yes 1 0
❑ No 2 5
C. Does the effluent discharged from this facility exhibit the reasonable potential to violate water quality standards due to whole
effluent toxlclty7
Code Points
V, Yes 1 10
❑ No 2 0
Code Number Checked... A 1 t I - R I I: C II' '
Points Factor 5.�.AI �TOTALV:
FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters [c —�/.¢
1v
A. Base Score: Enter flow code here (from Factor 2): 1 J 1 l 1
Check appropriate facility HPRI Code (from PCS):�
HPRI # Code HPRI soon
1
❑ 1 1 20
❑ 2 2 0
❑ 3 3 30
❑ 4 4 0
❑ 5 5 20
HPRI code checked: 11
A" N, K, Owl -
Enter the multiplication factor that corresponds
to the flow code. Ao�r 0.16
Base Score: (HPRI Score) x (Multiplication Factor) =
Row Code Multiplication Factor
11, 31, or 41
0.00
12, 32, or 42
0.05
13, 33, or 43
0.10
14 or 34
0.15
21 or 51
0.10
22 or 52
0.30
23 or 53
0.60
24
1.00
(TOTAL POINTS)
B. Additional Points— NEP Program C. Additional Points— Great Lakes Area of Concern
For a facility that has an HPRI code of 3, does the facility For a facility that has an HPRI code of 5, does the facility
discharge to one of the estuaries enrolled In the National discharge any of the pollutants of concern Into one of the
Estuary Protection (NEP) program (see Instructions) or Great Lakes' 31 areas of concern (see Instructions)
the Chesapeake Bay?
Code Points
❑ Yes 1 10
X No 2 0
Code Points
❑ Yes 1 10
No 2 0
Code Number Checke
' A I I
BlJ
t' LL.
Points Factor 6:
A
+ 8 I_I—J
+ . C i_I_I = 1 (TOTAL

NPDES Permit Rating 'Work Shee��t//
FACTOR 1-Conventionol Pollutants NPDES No.: 1,A I c-I 0I 6I 611 ZILLQ I
(only when limited by the permit)
A Oxygen Demanding Pollutant: (check one) *OBOD 14COD ❑
. Code
Points
Permit Limits: (check one) ❑
<100 Ibs/day
1
0
100 to 1000 lb,/day
2
5
❑
>1000 to 3000 lbs/day
3
15
❑
>3000 lbs/day
4
20
.
Lode Checked:. T' j
_
..
Points Scored II
B. Total Suspended Solids CFSS)
Code Points
Permit Limits: (check one)
C. Nitrogen Pollutant: (check one) ❑ Ammonia Other: 410AI
Nitmgm Equivalent Code Pohts
Permit Limits: (check one) <300 Ibs/day 1 0
FACTOR 4: Public Health Impact
Is there a public drinking water supply located within SO miles downstream of the effluent discharge (this Includes any body of
water to which the receiving water 1s a trlbutary)7 A public drinking water supply may Include Infiltration galleries, or other
methods of conveyance that ultimately get water from the above referenced supply.
DYES (If yes, check toxicity potential number below)
❑ NO (If no, go to Factor 5)
Determine the human health toxicity potential from Appendix A. Use the same SIC code and subcategory reference as In Factor 1. (Be
sure to use the human health toxicity group column — check one below)
Toxicity Group
Code Points Toxicity Group Code
Points
Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ No process
❑ 3. 3
0
- ❑ 7. 7 15
waste streams
Cl
0 0 ❑ 4. 4
0
B. a 20
1.
❑
1 0 Cl 5. 5
5
}❑
T� 9. 9 25
2.
.2 0 ❑ 6. 6
10
❑ 10. 10 330
\
lI
Code Number Checked: AIL
' Total Points Fodor 4: 1 LI-21
2

NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet ❑ Regular Addition
❑ Olscretlonary Addition
�y�� �J ❑""S�or¢ change, but no
NPDES No.: IL1 GI �I DI�I�ILI D I status change.
❑�-D'eletlon' •.. ..
Facility Name:
O S �'�"
I RI 01 /U I4 Iff—I
City: 1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I_I
Receiving Water:
Reach Number. I I III III I I I I
Is this facility a steam electric power plant (SIC=4911) Is this permit for a municipal separate storm sewer
with one or more of the following characteristics7 serving a population greater than 700,0007
1. Power output 500 MW or greater (not using a cooling pondflake)
2. A nuclear power plant ❑ YES; score is 700 (stop here)
3. Cooling water discharge greater than 25% of the receiving stream's 7Q10 flow rate tr NO (continue)
Cl YES; score is 600 (stop here) NO (continue)
FACTOR 1: Toxic Pollutant Potential
PCs SIC Code: I�I ��I�I
Primary SIC Code: I -�; Z-, (I f I
Other SIC Codes: 1 ZI ZI
I_I_I_I_I I_I_I_I_I
I_I_I_I_I
Industrial Subcategory Code: I_I_I_I
(Code 000 if no subcategory)
Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A. Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one)
Toxicity Group Code Points
Toxicity Group Code
Points
Toxicity Group Code Points
❑ No process
❑ 3. 3
15
❑ 7. 7 35
waste streams 0 0
❑ 4, 4
20
❑ B. 8 40
❑ 1' 1 5
❑
❑ S. 5
25
❑ 9. 9 45
2. 2 10
❑ 6. 6
3010.
10 50
Number Checked: II-0-1
..Code
' Total Points FaGOr 1:' I SI t
FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream Flow Volume(complete antorSocfionAorsxllon8,check only one)
Section A —Wastewater Flow Only Considered
Section B—Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered
Wastewater Type
Code
Points
Wastewater Type
Percent of lnstream Code Points
(See Instructions)
(See Instructions)
Wastewater Ccncen.
Type I: Flow < 5 MGD
❑
11
0
[ration at Receiving
Flow 5 to 10 MGD
❑
12
10
Stream Low Flow
Flow >10 to 50 MGD
❑
13
20
Flow > 50 MGD
14
30
TYPE 1/III:
< 10% ❑ 41
0
Type II. Flow <7 MGD
y❑
21
10
2 I D% to <50% ❑ 42
10
Flow 1 to 5 MGD
22
20
Flow>5 to 10 MGD
❑
23
30
250% ❑ 43
20
Flow >10 MGD
❑
24
so
Type 11:
< 1096 X51
0
Type III: Flow <7 MGD
❑
31
0
Flow 1 to 5 MGD
❑
32
10
2 1096 to <50% ❑ 52
20
Flow>5 to 70 MGD
❑
33
20
Flow >10 MGD
❑
34
10
2 SO% ❑ 53
30
_.
Code Checked from Section A or 8:
1 I I
-.
.. Total Points Factor 2:
I1
1

Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc
Permit NC0001210
Location: One Monarch Road
Altamahaw
Alamance County
Facility Description: Hosiery finishing facility. Scores and dyes nylon, cotton and acrylic hosiery.
Discharge is 100% industrial, 0.05 MGD, the treatment system consists of a bar screen, aerated holding
tank, pre -aeration basin, aeration tank, clarifier, holding tank and a sand filter.
Receiving stream: Reedy Fork Creek
Classification: C-NSW
Sub -basin: 03 06 02
Monitoring: Instream and acute toxicity

d�� QstQW_ /seas : rz�1
O
Cb zss�
zs° rs° Zo' _
opC,7,
�
0
.J

t Cn� give 0 2
ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY EVALUATION
LEVEL "B" ANALYSIS
SOURCE OF POLLUTION: floonAeCA D,S/�iI t�BMpA/�y
Areawide (208) Planning Area: /,/O /U - �a C�lAr�/
Facilities (201) Planning Area: IL)OA —©e— /�L1Ct'f ,CG��
A. RECEIVING STREAM /PGCC1Y
;r7o-.et eeeek
Classification: 14 —2z
7/10 Flow (Qs)' /6 C:{S
B. ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY DATA
�/ p
Water Surface Slope (ft/mi)
Stream Velocity (fps)
Stream Depth (ft)
Elevation @ Discharge Pt. (ft)
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
•m
7/10 Yield (cfsm)
Design Temperature °C)
Groundwater Runoff cfs/mi)
Deosygenatien Rate KI Base e)
Reaeration Rate (K2 Base e)
Mtn. Daily Avg. D.O. (mg/1
C. REQUIRED EFFLUENT LIMITS--,
Design Flow (MGD)
BOD5 (mg/l)
3c
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1)
Dissolved Oxygen
Total Suspended Solids(mg/1)
Fecal Coliform (#/100 MI)
o�
PH (S.U.)
D. COMMENTS 'Pe& f
&6kj roUNC
/
Dos" 7,5,4
es = a•a
500
400
300
200
E
O�
m e0
so
c 40
u
30
ti
4
YO
10 / 5
Design Flow (m d)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
C!°cT u°naTF I PAr,E I SECOND UPDATE ( THIRD UPDATE

b
�S Z') I '
CSZ.II)ISo'
cis) LZ'
(sysE)Ell
CS'oE �) z'ys
(T�W)(wt) Wed - 11
b-1
Hd
CVjo. b 10,
Ci'S9) q'6Z
551
UA)
6-9
CS z� • )9so �'"""'id
C88£� 41,1 Qo�
(f8 )Sf SSl
So� S'S81 ryv� I
v5'~�V ed
fbIl4I21
+YrT A

DATEECEMBFiiC is, k9n+
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE ALLOCATION NEEDED:Ielty-, 3Ae Zat IT-4
MEMO TO: Alan Klimek
FROM:
SUBJECT: Effluent limits for Permit Review --�`
DISCHARGE IDENTITY: "C;V1N%A kk
COUNTY: A -%"A4Qr=-
SUB-BASIN: GAPE Figtt
RECEIVING STREAM:?-EEb' F,6%4g, CLASS: D
7/10 MINIMUM FLOW: to — 'ZO C,FS, SLOPE: feet/mile
LOCATION OF DISCHARGE: APPRextMPItES=%t Q. Vf%VD-SAm FMQhd
DESIGN CAPACITY: 501OOC y.P.C.
EFFLUENT LIMITS
Parameter
UOD
BOD5
TKN vcf
TSS
Coliform (Fecal)
pH
Temperature
1) 12.,t
REMARKS:
PLEA SE
APFa1 As
l i Aaq (kh'1A51r
Limits (DUer)
_400 0 )44w
�-I��t_ �MF'aRt�A�t-�ot►I t�.1 �c "Iles-Co3cp
Mit. CgRT>6� �IE6.as �t�S 1MMEO�A�EL`�
E PA

V-.-"2 2q
�QQ2/ oOo-U,/
goo S -
a s-
so
y
7-SS -
/o. 6
- 2 /. S�
Co(D -
30
- GCS
�l
T Cl
-,o,5
- o, I
—
- . 6 S
— CC. /
C6 . /
- 0, 2
� 1
6 b J. ,�
//•S
— 3
— /UO.212
/.3
a -76
6,YS
0.4,5
©.52-

goo
n ,p a y ��r7o�I p''✓ krrnu�/ uo si uno xtv ne �F
4
(//y""Q bwul155b�

r
_ COD
Cr-r _
'1�?cobks -
Ju1 fd&5
PH
Saco>-d 1fm vcs f
N,gnafch. ?5 /7-roe-aged- %tarry hle__p-F kzeo A&-�
e y_ h1r e i�,7c-rease Pvoclv�f %o � ,/ �rr9m �� 600 #1d� - /0 �o
row p� �e5 ✓v/3S_ _/3D- ylO,S�__- BPT
- QP�a�iooe ally 7t/d7
av9- - - "'z�X - - - -
a,s s ,o ao
$o
ayv
-
61g
wi
l�
�lnlGL✓rGP�i 1�� Toxi`cs-c,5�ielore�.GrSsvm(t�a-74io
IW
wav 9 occur- of
al ovle 1oad1kjS6
FD r G'v7, Ptireh015 -
G'w = 0,4 ©,C76 ll - %,c = oss
C,os—
'
9 73
UT -

£or Industrial Dischargers List BP`i Below
y*�
F�ff_uent
Wnt Av
'- A era e
v--kv
la)
Characteristics
Conc.
:Toad,
Conc.
Ioad,
Conc.
nsd
Conc,
Iosd
Cone
Zaad
Fecal Colifonn
:solved en
otal SS
gok'd./
iz0 D
�N
H (range)
_5
(a
J Y H � �
. /- O 4
o
V X,4L/
0,4 -6
x' 4
l�
u
O
Industrial SIC Code: `i pe of Waste:
Effluent Guideline Reference:
Routing
To Initial
Information Services
Q Modeling and Alloc.
Q Regional Office

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION ��� ! 1 �`tIng °�3V° w-
Facility Name:
1/... - - - - --- Date:
County:(2 Permit No. Pipe No.:
Receiving Stream:j
Design Capacity (MM): 0. o S' Design Temp.: Requestor:
• _ �Mq
I.
i . ice— ♦ .•,__— r ' ___
_-
I �
IS -378
IS -378

a
Use �QID _aid sQ �d, 146514
�d'60 -
ih'L ��J!
pDu5 av�G��s�S G�Ji�l1a/ P�lyy �C��c��
S�ioltJS YLb �✓liS`�2.a � ��L��iS7l��Cl�Si v14ri�JY� ,
arely.
/t%fe
&/&�j (oLn
- DSS i �Z
�bCG7 C J U 5-� dow" 5�✓cG�--
DT
MP 2� a 1
�C g Dli
1
f no �/I�erFG�ic9Y� pccurs.

MoharG�j �fOSiery l�,lls,lv�C.. — �eec�yF-orlC
%�P7"l%SaPd� a
7910
1{ac fed s�e�e —
/l, s/h�jCla —
To-o Cr ►i y �l
cKr/rOunC� CrF -fr�Wl /ri'mary lyoni-1ol�I1C- AVdorK SX -.Kfv,,
2t OPO�Sass/ — 4ee6
larnce o/ et,/oac/as in�u�
OVP = ?,� (Pi
Cor
q.m,;,e = 1. 7 Th)q
Ci,ix =
im; x = ©.L 3P7" old
S�hc� /5 score- sf✓ihyenf 74kay7

i 4n<,
°I
acility Name:ot,)A- (ZCA I E r
V llj S _l-lu'r- .
Count;,; • f—f
JJ
IQatta-N-�
Permit No.
Preparedby:
Lat'i't
Date: l�l`i 17
CD0A
- Plarnirc Area Code:
�
Sut-basis. -cde:
03 a(o '-t ni-basis: ode:
__
r - - TJischa.?c- Plr)e: Dezrees:
�Q �LnL,=_. �/�
ce_cnd=_:
o_
Di _ : c a ogre s .
_ '" :1. .._---F�—

For Industrial Dischargers List BPT Below
Industrial SIC Code: j 2 92 Type of Waste:
'1
Effluent Guideline Reference:
-. • �1. P 3 Y� 136. 4/0
Routing
To Initial
— 1
Information Services p
Q Modeling and Alloc.
Q Regional Office

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Reverse Side
Facility Name: yY1 J-+ ), ,LI Date: 10 - 2-
County: (7p,. , o Permit No.: Pipe No.:
Receiving Stream: PLO PQ Class:
Design Capacity (IID): 1^, c Design Temp.: Requestor: O
S- /
Rout i
Sub —basin: C 3 - 0 (<
— C:` Drainage Area:
7Q1O:
/ S' c � S
Other Stream Affected:
/"1&.---._
Class:
C�
Limits (circle one):
Effluent or Wat•rQuetity Avg. Stream Flow:
DO Sag Pt.
(mi.)
t -
il? 1 •_ -
��
V- 1:
V.- .• .III. 11_
y. 1. 11 11 ■
- •• •
/// I
II • - • • _--__--____
r I
:M10,
Prepared by:4a��/ (�/�Xw�,ko Reviewed by: // �1l Date:
IS -3/78

*** INPUT IJATA SUMMARY ***
I
FLOW I
CBOL I
NBOD 1
Ii.O. I
I
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
CFS I
MG/L I
MG/L I
MG/L I
I
SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
WASTE 1
0.08 1
162.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
HEADWATERSI
48.00 1
2.00 1
0.00 1
7.56 1
TRIBUTARY 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
RUNOFF * 1
---------------------------------------------------------
0.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
:R RUNOFF FLOW IS IN
CFS/MILE

Request No
:4434
------ WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL. FORM ---------
Permit Number
Facility Name
Type of Waste
Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Requestor
Date of Request,
Quad
Wasteflow
5-Day BOD
COD
TSS
Sulfide
Phenols
T. Chromium
pH
: NCO001210
: MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC
: 5% DOMESTIC / 95%
INDUSTRIAL
EXISTING
REEDY FORK CRE0::
: C
030602
ALAMANCE
Drainage Area
(sq mi)
: 255.
WSRO
Average Flow
(cfs)
: 229.1
LULA HARRIS
Summer 7010
(cfs)
: 47.8
1/20/88
Winter 7Q10
(cfs)
: 60.8
C20NE
3002
(cfs)
.
- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS-------
MON AVE DAL MAX
(mgd):
0.05
0.05
(#/d):
14.25
28.5
(#/d):
171
342
(#/d):
62.13
124.26
(#/d):
0.57
1.14
(#/d)-
„,= %,2as
0.57
(#/d):
,215
0.57
(SU):
6-4
6-9
----------- MONITORING
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. NRCD
Division of
Environmental Mammoment
Wlnuton•Salom Rog, Office
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location: ABOVE DISCHARGE POINT
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location: BELOW DISCHARGE AT SR 1558
---------------------------------- COMMENTS ----------------------------
THESE LIMITS ARE THE BPTS.
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN CONCURRENCE WITH REGION
INSTREAM MONITORING FOR DO AND BOD5 ]WIPE C
FREQUENCY: WEEKLY FOR SUMMER (APR-OCT) AND MONTHLY F WINTER (NOV-MAR)
SEE. ATTACHED TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENTS
----- -
Recommended byDate
Reviewed by: iii_ `Ilp�
Tech. Support Supervisor -__.__ ..__1�`'�...._...__..._....._. _.. Date[oO _
Regional Supervisor .. . fDc/ Date 3/-13_Pp
Permits °.. Engineering ..... ._._.._.__ :._.-.----_---- Date _�ZzZA.-..
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES By -APR 05 1988.

Facility Name W6y,- h 4:5UN I L5 Permit # Aleboole? o
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT (QRTRLY)
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - No Significant Mortality
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a ouarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute
Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration". The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow (Pirnephalespmmelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour
composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality,
is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent samples for
self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. The first test will be performed after thirty days from issuance of this permit during the
months of Mar,.-i1)A.ti St/ /CEP.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGE6C. Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Technical Services Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit
suitable test results will constitute a failure of permit condition.
7Q10 �/'7 g cfs
Reconiniended
it
**Acute Toxicity(Fathead Minnow 24hr) No Significant Mortality at 90%, %YJ.TlJA/. A4
See Part 3 , Condition 1r.

S OO- �1 ��" 'f'°2�C3✓
urru �aT�a 61z/ a� �yC( 'Sso��Ja��'czl�-ID

Wou) ,oc
Y C6--W�O
7ss O
Mno is
P(acl tA-ch e-r,)
-" 7 v
ad.
.q 5'
5qo
755 (�iy)
Lea. l3
Cw
:5orv1-Uge-4- e>T

e
SUMMER
MODEL- RUN AT BPT FOR DODS
------------ MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC
Receiving Stream REEDY FORK CREEK
--------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O. is 7.67 mg/l.
The End CB0D is 2.09 mg/ l .
The End NDOD in 0.91 mg/l.
WLA
DO Min L:L-:i.1D
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1)
Segment 1 7.29 0.03 1.
Reach 1 107,.01
Reach 2 0.00
WLA
WLA
NBOD
DO
Waste Floc,
(mg/1)
(mpg/1)
(mgd)
0.00
0.00
0.05000
0.00
0.00
0.00000

�x* MODEL. SUMMARY DATA **
Discharger : MONARCH HOSIERY MILL -SF 1P1CSl.l"uhasiln e 630602
Receiving Stream : REEDY FORK CREEK Stream Class: C
Summer 70.1O : 47.8 Winter 701O a 6O.8
Design Temperature: 26.
1LEN'STH1 SLOPE! VELOCITY 1 DEPTH! Kd : Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 K11 : KH : KHR ! KHR 1
1 bile 1 ft/mil fps 1 It :design! 3200 !design: 320' :design; 3200 (design! D201 :
Segment 1 0.201 2.901 0.459 1 2.64 ! 0.29 1 0.22 1.33 1 1.17: 0.46 ! 0.30 ! 0.48 ! 0.00
Reach I: 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 1
1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 1 0.90: 14,301 0.729 1 2.09 1 0.29 1 0.90 110.46 1 9,181 0.48 1 0.30 1 0.48 : 0.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1
I Float 1 CDOD !
1 c:fs 1 mg/1 1
Segment 1 Reach! 1
Waste 0.O7e 1107.010 1
Headwaters! 47.800 1 2.O00 1
Tributary ! 0.000 1 2.000 1
* Runoff i C1. 1go i 2„0C)Si i
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1
Tributary 1 01000 , 2.000 1
* Runoff 1 O.18O 1 2.000 !
Rl.xnoff flow is in cfs/mil..e
NBOD 1
D.O. 1
mg/1 1
mg/1 1
0.000 1
0.000
1.000 1
7.3O0
1.000 1
7.300
1 . (.till') i
7.300
0.000 O.000
1.000 1 7.300
1.000 7.300

In 0)
m m
.r #
N U)
lid - - LO
:3 C.s Nw.P. f_l 0` 1.20).0 0 C. 0) 0`.p N o 0)C*-4`f0 '='3
C) 0. 01 01 Cl Cl Cl r .R 0) 'W 'Pi N fU N iJ N ') Ill N N N N ❑
v-PF MCI Nw Lo. -P.G J3 '7 •k�"o •p G -0 45 0°O sj°
� n
m N i� N N fU N N N N [U fn I Itl Ill N. I I i0 N M
CJ r.µN�4.µk.. �+. s_n-+. f+. t-•t+�r=mot-. �µµ�-.s-'. Li
•OOn _, N,Nu)OJ ^Ci CI Cl Cl O`0`L 0^^0`U``l j
Z Z
O 3
�!�O O C
t7 °il `0 `0 oof `0 .0 `0 .0 •0 q) `0 .D V `010.0 1) 10
Cl Cl O`0f 0`v�CJ C0 7m47 •L •+)•t?•d��l�0 1 C'r, Cl 0 0m
rr-M
m
C-
0 u1NNcom`�<`1<,Ili aa a.j�,.j
T i
GOnrJ Ci `0-0 vl-^, 0.Y).J) `0 �, �0 `0 �) 7)O)03 Co 03
0)0`4-'-wi--•:W 0`CA WC'0 C'1 •00)NO) w
0
1
T,
n
1
rn
O
Cl

6
SUMMER
MODEL RUN AT 1/1+TH DESIGN
FLOW & CORRESPONDING BP'i
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
:
MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC
Receiving Stream
2
REEDY FORT: CREEK
The End D.O.
is 7.67
mg/l.
The End CBOD
is 2.09
mg/l.
The End NBOD
1s 0.95
mg/ 1 .
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flwo
(mg/1.)
Milepoi.nt Reach
4 (mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/.1)
(mgd)
Segment 1
7.30
0.20 1
Reach 1
1070.10
0.00
0.00
0.00500
Reach 2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

0
SUMMER
MODEL RUM AT .0236 MGD AND
LOAD OF 63..5 MG/L BOD5 f4/37)
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
a
MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC
Receiving Stream
REEDY FORK:
CHEER'.
The End D.O.
is 7.66
mg/l.
The End CHOD
is 2.69
mg/l.
The End NBOD
is 0.95
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Mir:
CBOD
MBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach
fmg/I)
(mgd)
Segment i
7.29
0.20
1
Reach 1
r r.03
i..J4 t
0.00
0.00
0.02360
Reach 2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

MEMORANDUM
North Carolina Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section / Technical Services Branch
Intensive Survey Unit �30(yDZ
11 December 1967 C.
jed ForK
To: Trevor Clements
Thru: Jay Sauber4m%llt
From: Howard Bryant hl.4
Subject. Monarch Hosiery BOD Longterm (94 %)
Date Collected: 22 July 1987
Collector: J. Howells
Setup: 23 July 1987
(1315)
Day
BOD
NH3
TKN
NOX
TOT N
Reps
0
1.4
7.5
7.0
14.5
5
36
2.1
6.0
4.5
10.5
6
10
67
0.97
4.9
7.0
11.9
5
15
85
4
20
95
0.06
3.0
9.7
12.7
4
25
103
3
30
111
3
40
130
3
50
141
3
60
155
3
70
169
3
81
177
3
90
189
3
100
197
3
110
205
3
120
212
3
130
218
3
139
222
3
Comments: Cary Lab BOD5: 52 mg/1- pH: 6.65
Sulfite: 107 drops/100 ml sample(16 ml/BOD bottle)
Sample was seeded.
Test evaluation: good.

North Carolina Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section / Technical Services Branch
Intensive Survey Unit
1 1 December 1987
MEMORANDUM
To:
Trevor Cleme
Thru:
Jay Sauberd
From:
Howard Bryant /,J(d�j
Subject:
Monarch Hosiery BOD Longterm (100 %)
Date Collected: 22 July 1987 Setup: 23 July 1987
Collector: J. Howells (1655)
Day
BOD NH3 TKN NOX TOT N
Reps
0
1.4 7.5 7.0 14.5
5
41
3
10
66
3
20
68
3
25
97
3
' 30
106
3 '
40
124 _
3 -
50
136 -
3 --- -- -
60
14B. - ------
-3
70
>161 0.06 3.1 12.0 15.1
--=
81
>168
2 -
90
179
2 -
100
188
2
110
197
2
120
203
2
130
208
2
139
211
2
Comments: Cary Lab BOD5: 52 mg/l. pH: 6.65
Sample was seeded but no sulfite was added.
Total phosphorus: 28.0 mg/l.
Test evaluation: good.

North Carolina Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section / Technical Services Branch
Intensive Survey Unit
11 December 1907
MEMORANDUM
To: Trevor Cleme t
Thru: Jay Sauber
From: Howard Bryant I-/A�
Subject: Monarch Hosiery ODD Longterm (20 %)
Date Collected: 22 July 1987
Setup: 23 July 1987
Collector: Howard Bryant
(1350)
Day
BOD NH3 TKN
NOX TOT N Rep—s
3
29
3
5
51
3
10
80
3
13
91
3
20
106
3
25
116
3
30
126
3
40
142
-3 -
50
152
3
60
162
3
70
172
3
81,
184
3
90
193
3
100
201
3
110
210
2
120
217
2
130
225
2
139
231
2
Comments: Cary Lab BOD5: 52 mg/l.
pH: 6.65
Sulfite: 107 drops/100 ml sample(66
drops/62 ml sample)
Sample was seeded.
Test evaluation: good.

I
0
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
1' 1 1
rn�
rl 1-7-$�
-W-4 53
Date: —�(o -0
Permit No.: NCoOo 1 1 ) 0 Pipe No.: 00I County: 1V4M1zr�)ce.
Design Capacity (MGD): 0- 0 57 Industrial (% of Flow):
1,901.
Domestic (% of Flow):
Receiving
Stream: Kee_Q
T/L/Z liUx-ic
Class: C_ Sub -Basin: 0.3-
06 -O Z
Reference
USGS Quad:
ZO�F (Please attach)
Requestor: IZ7;�t/e � �✓�
Rog3s i Office
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: erJ`r Drainage Area: arJ`i m:1 Avg. Streamflow: z3�ic1a
7Q10: 4 A C�s Winter 7Q10: L I 45 30Q2: 7b e�d
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): G.0 Slope. .0� �m
Velocity (fps): O.5 Kl (base e, per day, 200C): G.49 K2 (base e, per day, 200C): a'$S
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
aaC.
;1 U
Comments
ACAD5
a
S
98.
CIA E
0,
cl.95
0,
k
0.
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
rEw UT '310 c\E tt
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
`�� Prepared By: `��r �UZ-0h Reviewed By: Date: /0'/6_8o

a
For Appropriate Dischargers, List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Maximum Daily
Ava€sge
Comments
z2. 1#
4s'0v
Ce
o `�
o`',
TS
98.1 r
196•Z�
l+
o.
Type
of Product
Produced
Lbs/Day
Produced
Effluent
Guideline Reference
KN,' Enkie,
f:;.V/Sk^Ij

MEMO. -
TO: 6�C�6U
1176WAChi hib5 o�j A` i
DATE:
SUBJECT:
�//o /4ko
-17
a" Co tAw � LIaGo i�U1a�c�
a2 �
�h
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development

. HK-
REQUEST NO. : 453
*####*****###*****#* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM #********************
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 : 48 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
MONARCH HOSIERY MILL
INDUSTRIAL
ALAMANCE
WINSTON-SALEM REQUESTOR : DAVE ADKINS
REEDY FORK SUBBASIN : CPF02
W7010 : 61 CFS 3002 : 70 CFS
254.00 SQ.MI. STREAM CLASS :C
***#**#****#********# RECOMMENDED
EFFLUENT
LIMITS #***#*##*****#*********
Ayaj
bd
WASTEFLOW(S)
(MGD)
0.05
COD = 270.09 540.0 LBS/DAY
BOD-5
(VcklL: :
22.5
45.0
SULFIDE = 0.99 1.8 LBS/DAY
NH3-N
(MG/L� :
PHENOLS = 0.45r 0.9 LBS/LAY
D.O.
(MG/L) :
TOT. CR = 0.451 0.9 LBS.DAY
PH
(SU)
6-9
FECAL COLIFORM
(/100ML):
TSS
(VblAgS :
98.1 196.2
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING (V) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION (t/) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
U
MODELER
SUPERVISORYMODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY :
DIVISION DIRECTOR
%%J�LLD�q� x( ,_DATE :Jkla�.1_
_DATE --
_ DATE
----DATE
------------------- ATE .---1_1?e�

LAIN
C
�♦
11
fi
fn
ll
tl
r
I LOP
71
C3
r
O
W
F
n
%'
rp

loW Chronli om S+d = . o, ► ,,3/1
B6 �,os5 bQlnre�
Cw = O,1 m9/1 C'�%C]c�s+ O.OsrnCO-
O-OSrnc7o I,SS
cis- 0,o5"8/I)
�i 5, 3 'ill
18, 9 Ibs/d ? BPT Iirn aF c,,A 5
rountl c�ron,7um ConeE-n• ldrn ure4rFo.p,n
�lc�w •� rarn pr'�mQr� � Itilonl�afiny j�l�wk s�c� ,
paa�i5�81 — R��a� F, 1L. CvtiElc
1360 ' ,nnal�5�s rfdon�- vs'ine�
i s'+ V031.0 Ira
`clfv = 5`lo "
new -7g10l cc-lcu"j vd,�
IZ l
L oSrn
VEl CCJCU(CJrJ
Q�, = Q38cps
�ru�=Cli
C�S o,n5mc7tN
DU b "'S/I
1 I 4 r3 BP"f golb5 = aa,515s/day
- 5�f 1'"5/1
usinc� CIBCZ: $OQS = 31, o_rA
&-ssunOlny nb NH3 -N
J
rn5A
b
ss
f<i�n li.U. iA d- niiJC �oi11�.
= 7.55 rn�/I
,� CLR �1rn;7S
Lo

MODEL RESULTS **********
DISCHARGER 'MONARCH HOSIERY MILL
RECEIVING STREAM 'REEDY FORK
THE END D.O. IS 7.61 MG/L
THE END CBOD IS 2.20 MG/L
THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L
THE D.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 7.55 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEFOINT 0
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 IS 162 MG/L OF CBOD
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS 0 MG/L
THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 REACH 1 IS 0.05 MOD

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
DISCHARGER
:
MONARCH HOSIERY MILL
SUBDASIN :
CPF02
RECEIVING STREAM
:
REEDY FORK
STREAM CLASS:
C
7010
:
48 CFS
WINTER 7Q10 :
61 CFS
DESIGN TEMPERATURE
:
25 DEGREES C.
WASTEFLOW :
0.05 MGD
ILENGTHISLOPE I VELOCITY [DEPTH I K1 I Kr I Kri I K2 I Oro I
(MILES IFT/MI I FPS I FT I /DAY I/LAY ]/DAY I/LAY ICFS/MII
SEGMENT 1 1 0.501 5.001 0.58 1 2.35 1 0.49 1 0.49 1 0.00 1 2.85 1 0.00 1
REACH 1 I I I I I I I I I I
ALL RATES ARE AT 25 DEGREES C.
REVISED ANALYSIS: NEW USGS FLOW ESTIMATEY NEW TSIVOGLOU
K2 EON.r AND USED FORMULA IN PGM TO CALCULATE VELOCITY.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCOOO/ag)O
FACILITY NAME: d]anM rCJ nos<,y ?)L) s 1„e.
Facility Status: = FCC wnNo J PSOPOSM
(circle osa) //�
Permit Status: OitE7�ff:VAL J YOOFICATION UbWER60TrED NEW
v4mis oaf
Mayor a 0 T
Pipe No: a0% --
Design Capacity (MGD): , 2 =' r 1Z
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments -
RECEIVING STREAM:
2e,��/ krk(ii=
Class: L
Sub -Basin:
o3
Ob
ate'
Referents USGS
Quad:
(please attach)
County:
l_l «,Wane
Regional Office:
As
Fa
Mo
He We Wi CJ
(clrite easy
Requested By:
Date: rl�——
Prepared By:
Ar
Date:i� r�
Reviewed By:
(JoDate:
Modeler
Date Rec.
•
Silv
t zo 6�
Drainage Area (m?) LZY Avg..Streamflow (cfs):C2z
7Q10 (cis)Z_ LSL_Winter 7Q10 (cfs)(CO-9_30Q2 (cis)
Toxicity Limits: IWCL.LLL—% (circle oae) Acute / Chronic
Instream Monitoring: n
Parameters ten tOA6rfi/l, �i�� til(611d11(t�t(l/1
Upstream 4— Location d&Ve Q�SCi1(//►e� )1'JLiL�
Downstream Location abu) d-56m4e
j /"Pl�1,v2KCt(1 • (;l%2�iy,-�v SU:LtliO/) �y �� .
/ CC IVIAN�hooly�v w�f (011`-*v)
Effluent
Characteristics
j'1?6jt. _� U�.
�li(. I�G�K
GODS C )
��. �25
.2,
/4�
d)
sv
-�
5-9
_
l5

r
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
6(' 1,5
+n w
Monthly
Average
rJ3
Daly
Maximum
Comments
2-,
L' U
Type
of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
1 Effluent
Guideline Reference
%'A2
— ;:e Fin15h:
OZJ
+f 'fC/0,�z

A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file
by the permittee for a minimum of five years from the dnte of .issuance.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to
YOU. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Babette McRemie, telephone number [phone], ext. 546.
Sincerely,
Pain
cc: Alamance County Health eD partment
Applied Water Tech
Winston-Salem Regional Supervisor
Mr. Dennis Ramsey
Mr. John Campbell
Engineer's Certification
1 as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that construction of these permitted
facilities has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications.
Signature Registration Number Date
Permit No. NC0001210

0
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary September. 30, 1988 Director
Mr. Charles Blackwell
Monarch Hosiery Mills
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, NC 27215
Subject: Permit No. NC0001.210
Authorization to Construct
Monarch Hosiery Mils
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Blackwell:
A letter of request for Authorization to Construct was received August 18,
1988, by the Division and final plans and specifications for the subject project
have neen reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby
granted for the construction of an effluent sand filter on the existing .05 MGD
wastewater treatment plant.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III,
paragraph B of NPDES Permit No. NC0001210 issued May 31, 1988, and shall be
subject to revocation unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed
in accordance with the conditions and limitations specified in Permit No.
NC0001210.
The Permittee must employ a certified wastewater operator in accordance
with Part III paragraph C of the referenced permit.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must he disposed of in
accordance with General Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approvable by the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
In the event the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily in meeting its
NPDES permit effluent limits, the Permittee.shall take such .immediate corrective
action as may be required by this Division, including the construction of
additional wastewater treatment and disposal facilities.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted
facility, a certification must be received from a professional engineer
certifying that the permitted facility has been installed in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the certification to the Permits and
Engineering Unit, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 2761.1-7687.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]

The Permittee shall employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in
responsible charge of the wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the
grade at least equivalent to the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment facilities by the
Certification Commission.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the Pennittee
for the life of the facility.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Babette McKemie, telephone number
919n33-5083.
Sincerely,
/ �—�
. Paul Wihns
m cc: Alaance County Health Department
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Mark D. Reich, P.E.

F
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
December 6, 1989
Mr. Richard Keziah
Monarch Hosiery Mills
P.O. Box 1205
Burlington, N.C. 27215
Subject: Permit No. NC0001210
Authorization to Construct
Monarch Hosiery Mills
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Keziah:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received November 13, 1989 by
the Division and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and found
to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the construction of an additional 45,000
gallon equalization basin at their existing wastewater treatment plant with continued discharge of
treated wastewater into Reedy Fork Creek.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III paragraph B of
NPDES Permit No. NC0001210 issued May 31, 1988 and shall be subject to revocation unless the
wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and limitations
specified in Permit No. NC0001210.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Pemrittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be
required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office, phone no. [phone], shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility has
been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to the Permits and Engineering Unit,
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611.

Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility has
been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to the Permits and Engineering Unit,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535.
The subject wastewater treatment and disposal facilities shall be connected to an operational
publicly owned wastewater collection system within 180 days of its availability to the subject
facilities, if the subject wastewater treatment or disposal facilities are in noncompliance with the
terms and conditions of the NPDES permit, the Authorization to Construct, or the governing
statutes or regulations.
Prior to the initiation of these connection activities, appropriate approval must be received
from this Division.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at least
equivalent to the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment facilities by the Certification
Commission. Once the facility is classified, the Permittee must submit a letter to the Certification
Commission which designates the operator in responsible charge.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the Permittee
for the life of the facility.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
'44V The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. John Seymour, telephone
number 919/733-5083.
ce
Geor
cc;_ Alamancc_County Health Departmeri�
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Training and Certification Unit
Facilities Assessment Unit
0

AC9,90lzio
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
July 31, 1991
Mr. Richard C. Keziah, President
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Incorporated
Post Office Box 1205
Burlington, North Carolina 27216
Subject: Permit No. NC0001210
Authorization to Construct
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Alarrance County
Dear Mr. Keziah:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received June 26, 1991 by the
Division and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and found to
be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the construction of an 8,000 gallon sludge
thickener with air spurges, influent impact diffuser, 3 inch decant line to clarifier and overflow
trough to aeration basin; and all associated piping, valves, and appurtenances with discharge of
treated wastewater into Reedy Fork Creek, classified Class "C Nutrient Sensitive" waters.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NC0001210 issued May 31, 1988, and shall be subject to revocation unless
the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and limitations
specified in Permit No. NC0001210.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management. _ ------_—
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Pemuttee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be
required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office, phone no. 919/ 896-7007, shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
• Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh. North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

O
(7OC
-IAN+% -j*jA i11 1'^i2A.49 'l0. 4f'
y` ,Au1wV.5 of 'J^+�} J&4 .i_»AAGM 'f0W#+ oa �u»o
2-0;tWIVIA �,24hM hAp Z-410(al
Of A4Ab /^^�ti 4oa' p1.+oA of b�baa/1 aA
b+5Aooq at -oil Z 4.:.il �-r.5 Wf WGI--*: bAA
-UAV vri w}Ab 1PPI

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Reedy Fork Creek approximately 50' upstream of outfall
Downstream Location: Reedy Fork Creek at SR 1558
Parameters: D.O., Temperature, BODS, Conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No ✓
If no, which parameters cannot be met? B
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes v/ No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

•1 ' . ! " . .
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Test/Limit:
Monitoring Schedule.
Existing Limits
FLOW (MGD):
BODS (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (SU):
COD (lbs/day):
Sulfide (Ibs/day):
Chromium (lbs/day):
Phenols (lbs/day):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1):
Temperature (°C):
Recommended Limits
FLOW (MGD):
BODS abs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
PH (SL*
COD (ibs/day):
Sulfide (lbs/day):
Chromium (Ibs/day):
Phenols (lbs/day):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Temperature (°C):
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1):
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Acute toxicity (24-hour) using fathead minnows
No significant mortality at 90%
same
Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec
Monthly Average
0.05
14.25
62.13
6-9
171
0.57
0.28
0.28
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
0.05
8.75
38.15
6-9
105
0.35
0.17
0.17
2.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification X
Data from Priority Pollutant Analysis
Change in production rates x
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Weekly Average
28.5
124.26
342
1.14
0.57
0.57
Daily Maximum WQ or EL
17.5 EL
76.3 EL
210
EL
0.7
EL
0.35
EL
0.35
EL
'.r• '_.r ''. ''
-rp
various
_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
92
x No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

v-) �q`i �o? RECEIVED
fp�Q6-00 N.C. Dept. of EHNR
F E B 1 1 M3
FACT SHEET FOR WAS TELO ALLOCATION
Winston-Salem
Request# 7264 Regional Office
Facility Name: Monarch Hosiery Mills, cJHosiery Mill
NPDES No.: NC0001210
Type of Waste: Industrial - 100%
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: Cape Fear River
Stream Classification: C-NSW
Subbasin: 030602
County: Alamance ,% / Stream CharacXeom
Regional Office: Winston-Salem USGS #956. 110
Requestor: Kepler ' 1� Date:
Date of Request: 1 Zt= Drainage Area
Topo Quad: C20NESummer 7Q10
inter 7Q10 (pverage Flow � 30Q2 (cfs):
Wasteload Allocation Summary_.,(approach taken, correspondence with region, EP�M( etc;
Dilution here is 625:1. Limits for oxygen -consuming wastes
and knit fabric finishing plants (SUBPART E 40 CFR 410.521
since the last WLA and this is reflected in lower mass limits. A
the last permit will be kept in this permit.
6 BPT 1' is for socks, textile, 7
). Production rates have changed,
other requirements contained in
The previous permit was written to include weekly ave ges instead of daily maximums. This
appears to have been a mistake since the effluent guide ' es read "average daily values for 30
consecutive days". It is therefore recommended that Ifirlits be gkven as daily maximums and
zpec
thly averages.ial Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL

WG4 / L
/gad.5 � SeD'i! �►j #//��ff/ i�Ft ' C �i� �� G1/i'// G /,ASS .
`/O//f ccJJrttrtG� • I /f �i1'/i o� Gvas AivGf�I �i/y Al
clAf�il7G9�OY7. ✓✓ `,
✓✓Alt�, c�Gcs �trc r uryuu�rle'rL .
/ Pii A '► ✓S f C � i we .,- f4 vt ef li `ZC �� / ��Q1/JG✓c !�/
C-/ i ms 4 hApC m«(e A v,l �u�� o� y�e�// ii� i ia,
o�/sW4c�i� , Dn 6��./L n� Z`f; �c193 Ar All/"I
%�DO�,e. fLY7�(�R'i'c�/ G( /��� Gtc:1f��1 P�:%ti ��L r%✓L��Cl� r%
���Irrltd�t's' �t' �� 2C'�!' ��S�C�•i-�f. ��� �ir��'�S S�i��<�
A ye w� so a S ,-re7o'
5

a3��OZ
`/fei AJ lov�
/n v lC. �Z . P2cf�,rC fil✓Y� K/0- /h
e2�eG�
5z" ewOGiii/��C
In
�O Dn /d S16-r/ 70 �/Cr n 1114 11�r"
/l�/TD ��OSS/�///�/ of��L�'`'�f �3?C2t�/�✓a�itM— � Gt �,c(�
✓,M� ,hsfca � .,n�ss-�✓�ed�", 1074 inks
� � caG�i�Js Gt/lt'� 4 r ✓.cry i� I� fir-rGt�.
47 Sl'C WQ isSuc�C �1c t��f c G�/��
f rnee
��ei1 �- cl/xM�?ic• .

IF MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC.
P.O. BOX 1205
BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27216
KNITTING DIVISION February 24, 1993
PHONE [phone] i
127 N. BROAD STREET
BURLINGTON, NC 27217
Ms. Coleen Sullins
DEHNR C
JUf'i�i1 L,.'.iG4Y2 1
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 pspi
B�
Dear Ms. Sullins:
When I filled out the application for permit to discharge wastewater,
(Standard Form C) in August of 1992, I listed an inaccurate figure for
our production rates. In Section II-3 under products, I listed our
maximum amount per day at 3,500 lbs. After talking with the president
of our company, Mr. Richard Keziah, on 2-17-93 I realized that the
accurate figure was 6,200 lbs. per day, instead of 3,500 lbs. per day.
I am sorry for any inconvenience and if you have any questions, please
contact me at 919-584-0361.
NM/gc
cc: Randy Kepler
Dave Goodridge
Best Regards,
*4(4
Neil Moore
Maintenance Supervisior
MONARCH HOSIERY MILLS, INC.
SALES OFFICE
FINISHING DIVISION
NO. I MONARCH ROAD
PHONE 919/SM 0361
ALTAMAHAW, NC 27202
FAX 919/SM 066
CClll Nell
?116,1 C
lot-,V'!RS ��ta 4-ZI -93

2/-z4 �°^"
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
f! ,
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Comments
t r
3/
T.61
7.
/ j.' Z'
µ10. 5Z (ef
31
0. aL
6, Z
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
Zee)

•�' _ '�
_
� tea, ..

6F.072V ZA4mcw
/UC0001?i1o, = QOStiro 5�93
14(;4 �sr� isz
11301�Z
AF d dab ckbt/UE //✓ c rkrTS
7 ye"/d pW, a oe, 1 / /- i —
lint
".zd 1,1514 cls .tA.i:- 7%13.�rvz4rG�
47
74 �� � y a?W 7,& ate
a5ka 4tG y 41u'

Facility Name
Q/✓ Gfl �l7i�E� y N� Pemvt # 61Z,10 Pipe #
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a guarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent
Concentration." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas 24 hour static
test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour composite. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time
significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). Effluent
samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste
treatment. The first test will tie performed after thirty days , from the effective date of this permit during the
ninths of _ ���/�SeRef
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity.
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 47
cfs
Permitted Flow o. 0 5
MGD
IWC (0. 76
%
Basin & Sub -basin c�PF
o 306•dz/
Receiving Stream �o nr
Rur./ e46;Ie'
County191jlrt��w
Reco nded by:
m
fNC/
Date 2 /
QAL PlF Fathead 24 Version 9191

Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Test/Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
Existiniz Limits
FLOW (MGD):
BODS (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (Sin:
COD (lbs/day):
Sulfide pbs/day):
Chromium (lbs/day):
Phenols (lbs/day):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/I):
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1):
Temperature CQ:
Recommended Limits
FLOW (MGD):
BODS (Ibs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (Si):
COD (lbs/day):
Sulfide (lbs/day):
Chromium (lbs/day):
Phenols (lbs/day):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Temperature CQ:
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1):
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Acute toxicity (24-hour) using fathead minnows
No significant mortality at 90%
same
Mar, Jun, Sep, Dee
Monthly Average Weekly Average
0.05
14.25
28.5
62.13
124.26
6-9
171
342
0.57
1.14
0.28
0.57
0.28
0.57
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average
Daily Maximum
WQ or EL
0.05
14.25
28.5
EL
62.13
124.26
EL
6-9
6- 9
171
342
EL
0.57
1.14
EL
0.28
0.57
EL
0.28
0.57
EL
2.0 q4
monitor
monitor
monitor
rrh1'�CvtG9L
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification x TP
Data from Priority Pollutant Analysis
Change in production rates
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
M
x No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

�^ f D
Cc'� "
w VtEHNR
L m,�z' On txtcic Of
FACT SHEEP FOR WAS I EtbALLOCnM �41
� qq� ve„ 19QS
�,, 'lk ctie �wc Salem
//���� �/Q Reque r f ei tO"S Office
Facilit l�lf%i -17y �Zj/93
NPDE
Type< r3� /7"o t CD�ittl tt�Nt
L
Facih[ hpul $4 ffav wfuee- 019Permii�
i�l Rece�C� �gci�/7w! /i91i3. �ti1�1
Strean a9�aG( 1%4f Al'sjaci Y+/�i
Subba nef k+rf h'� q/a6/4w ut/cu/afi'
Count �1rscS s%nu if �s s/�//fox
Regiol /i�+tfiorl. Gtk W/�YC A�/
Reque jvr 7'A ` K4' calla h sGe-
�ohea/,S
Date c o
u/clae
Topo I � �'I��/�5
/ � �s�/���u� e✓`sdrnt /inih.
—D��yrf r1
v rru-Ve l ul/ rWLAJ —A vw�-�> L.MU,
Tzn `I
Wasteload Alloc '" ,{
n� ..: t l �� ., l e r 19 1 I I n
nc./Hosie:
01A bccK o{ WV-1 ar-e
�a�ed oY, 3&()"- (��aduc �avt
WhA4 OCLOYG(i NW VLj
i ✓�CUVI^2 C�.
Ne w/ ncu ] �d K = (Pico"
et'IJeu (7$on oqJ)
O1� �vrd�Chev1=�r7664k/
(approal a.4 _ Ak)-d. AskiYUt M d
THIS IS ��q yy« 2�Ji �y. 'Pf., Pn.00�ch d #s ! 1N
NUMB] •e is 625:1.
Limits f WtA 60 K 6,J4 �( c0 �1 G3L( (/Jt Vj // c finishing
plants (t B � I ast WLA, but
limits st � CB r ,f us I W� 1. a v f ma`s `/e
The pr tums. This
appears ) 001r Gw j l . N m -1-o GLO s for 30
consecu Ims and
monthll^",1C)� L fi �d
Special fJ
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly lam/
Average 1 ((d
M ximum
Comments
1�5
o
�.75
05'Do
17.5D
21o.od
�ASc� oti 4 1065 2 a
i SS
38 . IS
76 , 3 O
O b
`t�ENOLS
0.17
U' . 33
CH Iu
17
O 35
�.o - 9
o Ste=
�Auu l/ 14E�i-ep �5 .
Type
of Product Produced
Lbs/ a
oduced
Effluent Guideline Reference
SDKs I@cT.1=
INN\. �iaa$z\(- �iN sN.N
�� r7C7�71
'-1 SU3P{y,Zi O

PERMIT NO.: NC0001210
PERMITTEE NAME: Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Hosiery Mill
Facility Status: _Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Minor -4
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.05 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
02693� 9y�o
b z o5 3 G 795o
N ycq39 .185o
RECEIVING STREAM: Reedy Fork am
Class: C-NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-06-02
Reference USGS Quad: C20NE (please attach)
County: Alamance
Regional Office:_ _Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/93 Treatment Plant Class: class I
Classification changes within three miles:
no change within three miles
Requested
Prepared by: LA
Reviewed by:
-�,Ob /ol, s
Date: 12/2/92
Date: G 93
Date:
3_ a
Modeler
Date Rec.
I #
D
IZ s Sv
'lze,,
Drainage Area (miL ) 2jS Avg. Streamflow (cfs): ZZ
7Q10 (cfs) Z17 � Winter 7Q10 (cfs) CO. F 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC —?P % Acu C nic QaL F
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream
Effluent
Characteristics
op
BODS 4 ""
//� 7iS
2 , S
NH3-N (mgA)
D.O. (mg/1)
A1OAJ1To,e
TSS 1}L65/01a7
2�1 Z6
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
COD CLes/CIAv)
1-7
lFiy&lqM(°c
NMI rD
Comments:,
y

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section / Intensive Survey Group
August 26, 1993
MEMORANDUM
To: Ruth Swranek
Through: Jay Sauber
From: Howard Bryant
Subject: Long-term BOD Analysis for Monarch Hosiery
County: Alamance
NPDES # NC0001210
Receiving Stream: Reedy Fork Creek
Sub -basin: 030602
DAY
BOD
NH3-N
TKN-N
NOX-N TN-N
0
2.80
5.1
1.20 6.3
5
22.9
2.70
4.4
1.40 5.8
10
42.3
1.70
2.4
1.70 4.1
15
65.3
1.40
4.0
2.00 6.0
20
87.6
1.00
2.0
2.40 4.4
25
104.6
30
125.7
0.06
2.6
3.30 5.9
35
141.6
40
155.8
50
179.3
60
196.5
0.10
3.7
5.30 9.0
70
211.5
80
220.9
90
227.3
0.05
4.3
6.30 10.6
100
232.4
110
236.9
120
240.8
0.08
3.7
6.10 9.8
160
251.1
Date Collected:
January 14, 1993
Collected by: Russell Test evaluation: excellent
1430-1530
pH:8.0
Seeded: seeded
K' D• 02a
NBOD: 22.85
CBOD: 228.25
CBOD/BOD-5: 9.97
cc: Central Files
C(3
= �(�3
;o0
G - 3a I
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
16, 5

PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECONNENDATIONS
The influent to the plant overflows when all the dye vats
are dumped simultaneously. The reason for the overflow is that
the pipe to the holding basin is not large enough to handle the
flow. It is recommended that a special condition be put in the
permit that requires a larger pipe to be installed to prevent
further overflows.
It is recommended that permit NC0001210 be reissued in
accordance with Division policy.
7✓
gnature of oport prepay
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
,6,9-q5
-o
Date

3.
4.
b.Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Sludge is
pumped from the holding tank and taken to the City of
Burlington.
Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Class II
SIC Code(s): 2252
Primary 55_ Secondary 02_
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0 4 1 X 7
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals
only)?
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests:
3
Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates
indicate)
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
(Please
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:

9. Location of nearest dwelling:
feet.
No dwellings within 1000
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Reedy Fork
Creek.
a. Classification: C-NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-06-02
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Has permitted discharges into
it.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: =0.05
MGD(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 0.05 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? 0.05 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities: Bar screen, aerated holding tank, to pre -
aeration basin, to aeration tank, clarifier, holding
tank, sand filter. Sludge holding tank.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit no.
Residuals Contractor
Telephone No.

C
cc: Permits and Engineerina
Technical Support Branch
County Health Department
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No. ---
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: (Jeanette Powell)
Date June 9, 1995
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECC
County Alamance
Permit No. NC0001210
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc.
PO Box 1205
Burlington, NC 27216
2. Date of Investigation: June 8, 1995
3. Report Prepared by: Jim Johnston
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
Mr. Richard Keziah, President [phone]
5. Directions to Site: Take I-85 to Burlington. Take the Elon
College Esit travelling North through Elon College on
Williamson Ave. which turns into Elon Ossipee Road. Stay on
this road until it runs into SR 1558 or old Highway 87.
Monarch is located near the old bridge on Old Highway 87.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 36 10' 30" Longitude: 79 31' 00"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. C20NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Ossipee
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
_X Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Located above the flood plain.

January, 1994 Crcwgh June, 1996
neoWgble bnsd o,d St4wdo0S](50-- ) //.
0.0963LI 4 0.050 ngd = I A l ibs�dm,
Puamerer:
Chromium
v GFQ•
AAbwabw:
671.5
]�
ye4 j belday IIO]
=IDs/tl/0.0834/flwv
otiB
cOMllQ.t�c4
n
IDe / d
m9d
RESULTS ♦o `"'JcC'1RI
1
106.6
0.008
0.009
Sid Dev. 153.3
2
165.4
0.040
0.029
Mean 228.3
3
184.5
0.020
0.013
C.V. 0.7
4
126.2
0.020
0.019
5
60.0
0-009
0.018
9
141.1
0.020
0.017
".41 Fawn = 2.1
7
66.6
0,010
0.018
Max. Value 671.5
8
74.9
0,010
0.016
Max. Pred Gw 1,410. yyl
9
266.5
0.040
0,018
Allowable Cw 671.1(' eyl
10
11
171.3
525 Jai '95
0,020
0.070
0.014
0.016
12
99.9
0.020
0.024
AIIa.W4ble bg3ed
0u
14
342.6
0.020
0.007
SicN�r♦¢d
15
222.0
0,050
0.027
16
211.6
0-060
0.034
17
246.9
0.070
0.034
18
171.3
0.040
0,028
19
126.2
0.020
0.019
20
199.8
0.050
0.030
21
82.7
0.020
0.029
zz
36.3
0,010
0.033
z3
119.9
0.003
0.003
24
129.6
0.040
0.037
M
112.4
0.030
0.032
26
319.7
0,120
0.045
27
171.3
0,010
0,007
28
249.8
0.050
0.024
29
177.6
0.040
0.027
30
166.5
0.050
0.036
31
473.3
0,150
0.038
32
299.8
0.080
0.032
33
671 February,'94
0.140
0,025
M
526 February,'94
OA10
0.025
35
417.1
0,080
0.023
3B
490.5
0.090
0,022
37
38
36
�"JA 16
mew: Sulfides
New: 1366.9
µWl i bNday / 0.0834 / 0.050 mgrl ]
Ibs/d / 0.0834 / flow
OW
Ibs/d
mgd
RESULTS
1 230.6
0.050 •
0,026
Sid Dev. 964.2
2 206.7
0.050 •
0,029
Mean 414.7
3 599.5
0.050 '
0,010
C.V. 2.3
4 272.5
0.050
0.022
5 60.0
0.009
0,018
e 5995 April, 95
0.050
0.001
Mull Factor= 4.8
7 1199 May, g5
0,050
0.005
Max. Value 5,995 µ
8 499.6
0.050
0,012
Max. Pred Cw 28,777 µ
9 315.5
0.050 •
0,019
Allowable Cw 1,367 µ
10 .2
0.050 '
0.014
4q �/
11 374.7
374
0.050
0.016
12 l l
0.050
0.032
13 239.8
0.050
0.025
14 166.5
0.050
0.036
t(,13 /S i 11E
15 545.0
0.050 '
0,011
1s 206.7
0.050 '
0.029(Z
MA5.5
17 230.6
0.050 '
0.026
�lMy. GONJEQ;Itd
1s 109.0
0.010
0.011
��
19 149.9
0.050
0,040
COAli:r, 4,0
20 176.3
0.050 '
0,034
21 187.4
0.050
0,032
22 399.7
0.050 '
0.015
23 187.4
0.050
0.032
24 166.5
0.050 '
0.036
26 260.7
0.050
0.023
W 105.8
0-030
0.034
27 157.8
0.050
0,038
28 193.4
0.050 '
0.031
29 206.7
0.050 '
0,029
30 159.9
0,020
0.015
31 138.4
OMID
0.026
32 102.8
0.030
0,035
33 214.1
0,050
0.028
34 159.9
0.040
0.030
35 99.9
0.030
0.036
3s 184.5
0.040
0.026
37 224.8
0.060
0.032
38 0,050 ' is one-half the detection
limit for
[nose values
39 feu than deta(ton
&895

J.', • 1• 1 1 1 1
Upstream: 50' above discharge
Downstream: SR 1558
Month
Temp
DO
Saturation
BOD 5
Conductivity
Temp DO Saturation
BOD 5
Conductivity
Jun-95
26
4.4
64%
4.45
215
27 4.5
560/6
3.95
208
May-95
23
6.6
65%
3.0
440
24 5.6
67%
3.2
436
Apr-95
21
4.0
45%
6.15
483
21 4.2
47%
6.8
463
Mar-95
17
6.1
63%
6.1
321
17 6.4
66%
5.2
319
Feb-95
12
7.5
70%
5.3
269
12 7.3
680%
7.3
271
Jan-95
11
8.1
74%
2.6
350
11 7.5
68%
3.15
360
Dec-94
15
7.0
69%
2.2
518
15 6.8
68%
1.65
508
Nov-94
16
6.1
61 %
1.95
480
16 5.8
590%
1.95
494
Oct-94
18
6.3
66%
2.2
458
19 6.2
66%
1.75
458
Sep-94
24
6.7
80%
2.1
444
25 6.2
75%
1.85
421
Aug-94
26
4.4
54%
1.9 •
227
26 4.6
57%
4.6 •
225
Jul-94
26
4.8
59%
2.2
359
26 4.7
68%
2.0
370
•
BOD 5 same day and time, (only one sample that month)
Ammonia [2 / 4 mgA] - Residual Chlorine - Fecal Colllorm
Instreem Waste Concentrations
Ammonia as NH3
Residual Chlorine
(summer)
7010 (cfs)
47.8
47.8
7010 (cfs)
Design Flow (mgd)
0.05
0.05
Design Flow (mgd)
Design Flow (cfs)
0.077
0.077
Design Flow (cfs)
Stream Std (µgo)
17
1
Stream Sul (mgA)
Upstream bkgrd level (µgA)
0
0.22
Upstream bkgrd level (mgA)
IWC (%)
0.2%
0.2%
IWC (Ye)
Allowable Concentration W)
10570.2
485.2
Allowable Concentration (mgA)
Albwabb Cwwtratbn(mein
10.570
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
60.8
7010 (cfs)
0.05
Design Flow (mgd)
Fecal Limit
Not Required
0.077
Design Flow (cfs)
Ratio of 618 :1
1.8
Stream Std (mgA)
0.22
Upstream bkgrd level (mgA)
0.1%
IWC(%)
1249.4
Allowable Concentration (mgA)
c
aws

sr� i
U Lkr 76
Maha
3
It
u .. •i•'Clm 1 I_
03
f
03
�" _ 4
o 611
i x 0
G.EN
5 N�TAMANAW- OfS. EE
�• � 4'` 1.0 Fw.E ui.gfA� SLMUOL
.'�V..:•
I Al mehxw-(Ins � i
CD F r, cem f
' OY/4 ('�IOJARL.N i�oS�E�%��y5
oz-09359`102
HDRNER SNVESt Mr �- -•
i
i I
I,..��i
`',.``, �. I t j( .\�� ����< 1� II' 1 '� :� � ,�I, I� pa• ��a \I'�l l`\//�qo \\:� �
7
T'ona6`A
LE
/ \rm .os Inf , ; n oz.o9sc.0 now / - `i J - -!S .°�`''�•- �.
I ° �'�••• I,�. 2r.)AA+{1 NtE CiWT) -'I �•y. i\_�-_� 1, l J�
J / e
/ L
Da
I sso J J
{ 1—
'V) • H 1 • II let.. � I)

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
Monarch Hosiery Mills, Inc
NC0001210
100 % Industrial
Existing
Renewal
Reedy Fork Creek
C NSW
03-06-02 1
Alamance
Winston - Salem
Powell
7/26/95
C 20 NE
t Request # 8334
Stream x
USGS #
Date:
1993 WLA
Drainage Area (mi2):
255
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
47.8
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
60.8
Average Flow (cfs):
229
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
0.16 %
Existing WLA checked:
x
Staff Report:
x comments for P & E
Topo checked:
x map attached
USGS Flows confirmed:
IWC Spreadsheet:
nr
fnstream Data:
x attached
1993 and before: refer 1993 WLA write-up for good history overview
1993: Fad Sheet was completed and returned when facility faxed in a letter indicating that they made a mistake in their production
levels and that they should have used 6,200 Ibs/day. This increased their loading. To mitigate this situation the facility
accepted the limits from their previous permit. A 2.0 mg/I Total Phosphorus limit was added to the permit during this renewal.
Note: phenols was limited on the last Fad Sheet, but did not get into the final WLA or the permit. Phenols are limited per CFR's,
therefore they will be recommended in this WLA.
DMR's
from November, 1993 through March, 1994 this facility was in violation of its BOD limit
also failed COD limit for February and March, 1994
Toxics
attached spreadsheet, (Toxics Spreadsheet) which calculates the concentrations of the reported discharges. Both Chromium and
Sulfides indicate strong potential for concentration violations, (concentration is based on CFR mass limits - State Standard
concentration limits would be much more lenient). After consultation with Golsen Sullins, (P & E) about this issue, she pointed out that
these limits are much lower than the water quality concentration limits and that by limiting this facility on a concentration basis we would
be discouraging any water conservation practices. Therefore, I will recommend the CFR mass loading limits.
Instream Monitorinc
as the BODs information is not really useful. (an ultimate BOD would be useful) 1 will drop that requirement.
the percent saturation in this waterbody is poor. there is a dam downstream, (as portrayed on the topographic map) and this may be
driving the velocities down and hence the DO's, (this facility constitutes only 0.16 % IWC).
Basin Issues
This subbasin contains a number of major facilities, industrial and municipal, and several areas where water quality is impaired due to
overallocation, facility non-compliance, excessive non -point runoff, and other factors. Modeling analyses suggest that point sources are
causing BOD/DO and toxicity problems, and contributing largely to nutrient related problems. Recommended allocations reflect the
level of treatment necessary to reduce the magnitude and frequency of water quality standard violations.
...A QUAL2E model has been developed from Cone Mills on North Buffalo Creek and from the T.Z. Osborne WWTP on South Buffalo
Creek to Reedy Fork at Ossippee in order to reallocate NPDES permit limits for the protection of water quality.
In light of the extremely limited assimilative capacity for oxygen -consuming wastes in Buffalo Creek, no new wastewater outfalls should
be permitted within the basin. The existing municipal facilities, should serve as regional treatment facilities to handle future wastewater
needs. All remaining permitted facilities should be required to conduct an engineering alternatives and economic analysis including the
feasibility of connecting to municipal sewer service. If there are no feasible alternatives, limits of BODs=5 mg/I, NH3N=1 mg/l, and
DO=6 mg/I will be required and a schedule for implementation developed. It is anticipated that, through basinwide planning, all
discharges within the Buffalo Creek Basin will eventually be required to implement state-of-the-art treatment technology. At this time,
the technology limits are BODS=5 mgll, NH3 N-1 mg/l, and DO-6 mg/I. Future wastewater expansions will require environmental
assessments.