310282_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240905

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number EM] - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County• LI Region: uV i` v
Farm Name:T)"Joix (�—� �tij{� �": '� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: � V� ►�tU(�e� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
ftW�3/ bZM
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
can to Feeder 1 INon-Layer I Dairy Calf _
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes dNo DNA ONE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Stricture ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

1?acilit Number: - Date of Inspection: lj o2
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [a'*Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �� U? A I VV �
Spillway?: i
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 kIR
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc,)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:) Yes �Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 63,Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste strictures require ❑ Yes [TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes glo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LSO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to ❑NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ] Yes E34o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes EJKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents // I
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 940 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes F34o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers []Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [9 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA QNE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: ,�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ Nf�,
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑-NIA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document D Yes [Er'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [I�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
yw� t 6 IS�rcv rev f � vJ ,�t
ae
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 4 ( Phone: C /(J T ,
tj
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ,2
Page 3 of 3 S 12120-20