NC0025453_Historical information_20061231

I
Weather conditions:
Source of spill/bypass (check one): .Sanitary Sewer
Level of treatment (check one):
gallons
-^LZLPL'ecjlc^ pipe 2. Cause of spill/bypass:

Revision#! 6/11/99
Please explain the time taken to make initial assessment: 'Sig/Y A)
tAC ---------------~—___Z u ---------------------------------------
Please provide the following information:
'1. Location of spill/bypass: Q. r

How long did it take to get ,a repair crew onsite?
---------------Hours 15 Minutes
4. How long did it take to mak£
Hours IS
an initial assessment of the spill/overflow after first knowledge?
_Minutes
%/4
IC? /vu V x
r 3 /
3 holida'Jsh)?^e PerS°nnel available t0 Perform initial assessment 24 hours/day (including weekends and
Yes No
Did spill/bypass reach surface waters? Yes
Volume reaching surface waters?
Name of surface water L/ufe
No (If Yes, please list the following)
Q Z,oo6
s&frlGi ctCM
Did spill/bypass result in a fish kill?Yes
. If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed?
^fcwage Spill Response EvaStFatidW
(page 1 of 2)
Permittee TXu/V Permjt Number /UC 0025^ 53 County
Incident Ended: (Date/Time) p/ C'^iS Estimated Duration (Time)
First knowledge of incident: (Date/Time) / D~)S
Estimated volume of spill/bypass i ’gallons. Show rational for volume.
*3> V A/w ■ — T-p'ZG)
If spill is ongoing, please notify Regional Office on a daily basis until spill can be stopped. '/
Reported to: / L-C(/l; (Date/time) 1 / 1 o/00 I H 3O
Name of person ~ "
QloCcdo/
Pump Station WWTP
None Primary Treatment Gnct^)
Secondary Treatment Chlorination Only
!aj

Yes No
Revision#] 6/11/99
<
<
_ Phone Number: ?V5^3 h
_____ Date: / 13 O6>
cy>
‘^==^
/ /uz x? _JZ€a 4
& freer && Vtcu''^'ZXs aJceq ,
Other agencies notifed:
Person reporting spill/bypass:
Signature
“=:==================:==:=======___________________________
For DWQ Use Only:
DWQ requested additional written report?
It yes, what additional information is needed?-----
Requested by ’-----

8. Repairs made are: Permanent Temporary

______ ____ ~ ---------------------------------------------------------
Sewage Spill Response Evaluation:
(Page 2 of 2)
O&iA&rmit Number /^'C 2 3~ yjO’County ZTo/) /Usi/) xJ
5. Action taken to contain spill, clean up waste, and/or remediate the site:
. z Q^Ga. cterb
Oc'Ccobo

Permittee

7. If the spill/overflow occurred at a pump station, or was the result of a pump station failure
was the alarm system functional at the time of the spill? Yes No If the alarm
system did not function, please explain why: Ay/T-
6. Were the equipment and parts needed to make repairs_readily available?
Yes No ■ If no, please explain why:
-kcrtcji rnatry
d^/'L^Ltjd
. ■ -r------------------- -- QL-Ct
1/7^ -fry

10. Comments.^y/^
2oo(,oo\^
1. Gather Required Information:
Date of call Time of call
Name of caller
End date LA.PM
Estimated volume
Location
Cause
Steps taken to correct
(Give Caller My Name) Received by
3. Comments:
()]/ u/
Standard Operating Procedure for SSO Calls
Did Spill/SSO reach surface waters
Name of Surface Water
Volume reaching surface waters
Conveyance
Did Spill/SSO result in fish kill
1 d / '
2. Enter into Bl MS v
Log into the public portal version of BIMS (http://bims.enr.state.nc.us:7001/Welcome.do)
Go to Tasks, Incident, Enter Incident
For SSO, fill in the SSO and 24 hour forms, record the incident number, then save the file and close.
For Spills, Complaints etc, check the type of spill box, fill in the Incident report, record the incident
number and close.
Caller phone #
Facility name
County_____
Permit # (if available) WQCS
Start date| j | ()1oC»____Start time
\/[I lob End Time
Mi 2^ISA z — X7
WlATlf
NPDES K/CQ0 r?
> AMf P
(J JO
^0
_JL
F
April 13, 2006
Dear Mr. Biggs:
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone].
KLH.dr
cc:
4.
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1633
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: www.nccgl.net
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. R. Steven Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
Post Office Box 879
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
The Wooten Company - Shankar Mistry. P.E.
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Daniel Blaisdell, P.E.
PMB/DMU/FEU/SRF
Sincerely,
IL
Michael
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
K. Lawrence Horton, III, P.E., Supervisor
Facilities Evaluation Unit
SUBJECT: Town of Clayton
Engineering Report for Wastewater Discharge
to City of Raleigh Wastewater System
Project No. CS370431-06
V c-f DUQI
Z-
I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the subject Engineering Report on
March 28. 2006. The Facilities Evaluation Unit has initiated the project review, and we will
notify you and your engineer upon 'ompletion of our review.
OneNorthCarolinaNaturally
1 -
152 cr
I
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 3, 2006
Dear Mr. Biggs:
Sincerely,
cc:Central Files
James Warren, Town of Clayton
Dana Folley, Pretreatment Unit
Christopher Wu, RRO
Christopher Wu
Environmental Specialist
Phone[phone]
FAX [phone]
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Steve Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
P.O. Box 879
Clayton, NC 27520
Subject: Pretreatment Annual Report Review
Town of Clayton
Johnston County
NPDES Number: NC0025453
OneNofthCarolina-----------Naturally
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
------- X
4
DUQ
The PAR is considered complete and satisfies the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) and
the Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
The Central and Regional Offices have reviewed the Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
covering January through December 2005. This PAR was received on March 1, 2006.
NC DWQ/PERCS Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/Pretreat'index.html 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Thank you for your continued cooperation with the Pretreatment Program. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact Dana Folley at [phone] ext. 523 [email:
dana. [e-mail]].
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Date May 25, 2006
<3^
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report NC0025453
Dear Permittee:
Sincerely,
Michele Phillips
cc:
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Attention: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division’s database. Our data entry staff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached form along with a copy of the problem DMR for details regarding the DMR’s deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect our staff’s ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES permit and 15A NCAC 02B .0506, and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
1617 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Raleigh, NC 27604
Steve Biggs
Little Creek Water Reclamation
PO Box 879
Clayton, NC 27528
..One, _North Carolina____ Naturally
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
£
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext. 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
V)
0^^
co/r\i I ifj
> ILjrwSjS
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carol inauepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report
□The written values are illegible.
□The Average, Maximum, and/or the Minimum data points have been omitted.
□The Units of Measure have been omitted or are incorrect.
The DMR Parameter Codes have been omitted.
Other:
,'Vkx (Vi
Hr/I &
Facility:
County:
DMR Month and Year:
The Division of Water Quality deems the aforementioned DMR as incomplete due to the
following reason(s): (Please see the highlighted areas on the attached DMR for
details.)
Zlo J
V Ci
■5
^24
Permit Number: (2 & 0 3
U IkU CriMther"
I
Questions
11
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
Action Plan
3.
7.
Project Schedule
2007 2Q09 2010
10
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
Council continue its review of options
Implement the Clayton/Raleigh connection
(Target 1Q 2008)
Initiate design & permitting for Phase I
improvements
Receive NPDES Permit (Target 4Q 2008)
Pursue financing options
Pursue TN allocation purchase within NRCA
Membership or through State
On-line with expanded WWTP (Target 3Q 2010)
; Task
Council reviews options
Implement Clayton/
Raleigh connection
Design & permitting of
Phase I improvements
Secure TN allocation
j for expanded flow
Receive NPDES permit
Pursue financing
; options____________
I Advertise and bid
| project_____________
' Expand WWTP
2008
-A
Financing Options
Likely Financing Scenario
* Bond Referendum is Required
9
■ NC-DENR: State Revolving Fund
(Loan @ 2.3% for 20 years; maximum $15M)
■ General Obligation Bonds *
(Loan @ 5% for 20 years; $5M - $10M)
■ Certificates of Participation
(Loan @ 5.5% for 20 years; $5M - $10M)
■ Possible Grants (July 2008)
> CWB Grant (Potential of $3.5M)
> Rural Center Grant (Potential of $0.4M)
■ NC-DENR
> State Revolving “Loan”
> State Revolving “Fund” (Loan)
> Clean Water Bond Grant
■ General Obligation Bonds *
■ USDA Rural Development
■ Certificates of Participation
■ Combination of the Above
* Bond Referendum is Required
$22.650.15 22.5
$30.52.0 3.0 27.5
$45.58.03.0 37.5
Project Timeline
8
Begin Design & Permitting of Phase I Improvements
Secure Required TN Allocation for Expanded Flow
Receive NPDES Permit
Advertise and Bid Project
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
Begin Planning for Phase II Improvements
Prepare Preliminary Engineering Report
Request for Speculative Discharge Limits
Nitrogen
Purchase Cost
(million $)
Construction
Cost
(million $)
Estimated Total
Project Cost
(million $)
1Q2007
4Q 2007
4Q 2008
1Q 2009
2Q 2009
3Q 2010
1Q2011
Completed
Completed
Phase 1
Capacity
Increase
(mgd)
1.5
Phase 1 Total Project Cost
Comparison
Pertinent Issues Regarding Phasing
Pertinent Issues - Cont’d
7
■ Near term growth (1.6 mgd in five years)
requires additional capacity
■ Additional TN allocation required
■ Project financing more palatable
■ Increased customer base required
■ Securing an expanded NPDES permit may require two
years
■ Construction improvements can begin only after NPDES
and required TN allocation are in hand
■ While permitting may require two years, an additional
two years may be required to bid, award, construct and
attain compliance
■ Expansion at existing plant yields only marginal capacity
increase (0.4 mgd) without requiring major process train
improvements
■ Expansion at existing plant would be concurrent with
Phase 1 improvements at Neuse River Site
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0 1
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0 -
1.0
$22.51.5
$27.52.0
$37.53.0
* Costs are projected for project bidding in 2009 assuming a 10% inflation increase per year.
6
Phase 1 Capacity
Increase
(mgd)
2014
Year
Estimated
Construction Cost
(million $) *
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
(Expanded capacity constructed In 4 phases)
0.0 -F .
2004
I
I
I
!
Clayton Phase 4 Expanded
Capacity [1.50 mgd]
Clayton Phase 3 t
Capacity [1.50 m
Phase 1 Construction Cost
Comparison
Clayion Phajp-Z^expanded -padj^Tmgd]
Phase 1 Expanded Capacity [1.50 mgd)
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
Clayton Phaj
5.0
3.0
1.0 -
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
2022
5
0.0
2004
3.0 —
2.0 - I
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
(Expanded capacity constructed In 3 phases)
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
(Expanded capacity constructed In 2 phases)
0.0
2004
—
Expanded Capacity [3.0 mgdj
>»
o
Q.
O
22s<
. o, C 40 m,al
-
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year
E_
£•
o
s-
O
Ji
1 4.0
ra >
s o
H 2.0 -
------------Glay+en Phase-3-----------
Expanded Capacity [2.0
— '"e
«<E«p.„d«aC.P.cK,I2 0™0d)
....
e Capacity [O.Ad'mgd]
..r'rrzrzr.
P012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Year
20242006 2008 2010
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
10.0
9.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
4
0.0
2004 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year
' - • ■
2006 2008 2010
8.0
1 -
i-
8 6.0
8-o
>
3o
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
.....-------—q
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
a 6.0
I
o 5.0
2
| 4.0
5 3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Wastewater Capacity: All Sources
Projection of WW Flow vs. Available Sewer Capacity
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
2012 2018 2020 2024
3
LCWRF
Johnson County/Benson
City of Raleigh
Expanded Clayton Facility (ail phases)
Total
I
E
£• £ a.
O
a>
S>
5 o
2.5 MOD
0.4 MGD
1.0 MGD
6.0 MGD
9.9 MGD
2014 2016
Year
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 H
Evidence of Growth
■ Approved Development Requested Flow = 0.702 MGD
■ Pending Development Requested Flow = 1.197 MGD
■ Average Number of Building Permits Issued per Year = 748
2
■ Approximately 85% of total wastewater flow requested to date
for approved and pending development is expected to be
required within the next 5 years.
■ Projected 2025 Population - 66,554
■ Projected 2025 Wastewater Demand - 8.1 MGD
■ Most cost effective solution is to optimize
capacity at the existing plant and construct future
capacity improvements at the Neuse River site.
Key Findings of 2005 Wastewater
Capacity Study
<
November 6, 2006
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
Current Wastewater Status
c s_
1
■ Permitted WWTP Capacity = 2.50 MGD
■ Rolling 12 Month Average = 1.6 MGD
■ Sewer Customers = 5,521
■ In Compliance with Discharge Permit
Wastewater Capacity
Update