820269_Routine Inspection_20240730

type of visit: ri Uompliance inspection U operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Timer County: dY7 Region: /r-7/ej
Farm Name: (/q/�1Gt'f M Owner Email:
Owner Name:P��fh &2iY11
//l Gtri/� I Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �.'6 J 2e42 9Leit c Title:
Onsite Representative: l t
Certified Operator: t l/Jt li�C�[Ce tr
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Phone:
Integrator:�•�
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[—]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - (y / Date of Inspection: -.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural heavy less
dNo
plus storm storage plus rainfall) than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes E2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): l Cam/
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes -0—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
,[]i
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes LENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes E� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CCroop- ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
�/Winnddow
12. Crop Type(s): l/Uc�JT/%/ �//� d�%/�kf( Os' J `-o
13. Soil Type(s): Wa 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes Ej'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 12No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes �;_TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes E:rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes J�!J`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes _[2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENO
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ,'No
❑ Yes .j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: IDate of Inspection:rJ-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ff&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [—]Yes �j`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes _&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
xo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Grp Po )4
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020

racutty NO, g,2 Time In
-�� _ Time Out
Farm Name � G�i��
Owner
Integrator
—
Operator • Site Ra;^
lack -up No.
No.
HOC Circle: General or NPDES
FREEBOA
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test a/ Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard ✓ Daily Rainfall v
Spray/Freeboar Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis;
Date Nitrogen (N)
g aS
Date
Sludge Survey & 1.31 Y3 / g
Calibration/GPM G llaua�
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
i
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)
i i8 a, 3 1 7 �>2,U/