WQCS00038_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240823

Docusign Envelope ID: 3DC07736-62B9-4422-948D-5669B860A543
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Claudia 0. Hager, County Manager
Durham County
200 E Main St, 2nd Floor
Durham, NC 27701
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 23, 2024
SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION REPORT
Permit No. WQCS00038
Durham County Collection System
Durham County
Dear Ms. Hager:
On June 27, 2024, Division of Water Resources (DWR) Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) staff Jesse Barnes conducted
a routine compliance evaluation inspection of the subject wastewater collection system to evaluate compliance with
the subject permit. ORC Wade Shaw was present during the inspection. A review of records, operations,
maintenance, and system components was completed. This review reflected compliance with the subject permit.
Any permit violation(s), item(s) of concern, and/or general observations are listed below. Inspection findings are
detailed in the attached Compliance Inspection Report.
General Observation Items
1. Permit Details: Version 4.0 of the subject permit is effective from October 24, 2019, until October 23, 2027.
DWR records indicate the wastewater collection system consists of approximately 105 miles of gravity sewer,
10.3 miles of force main, and 13 duplex pump stations. The system appeared to be as described in the permit.
2. Reported Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs): During the 12-month period prior to the inspection, two SSOs were
reported to DWR: Incident 202301115, 5,000 gal (3,000 gal to surface water) released from a manhole at 31
Alexandria Way due to rags in the line and Incident 202301508, 180 gal released to surface water from 6909
Wexford Woods Trl due to pipe failure. Notices of violation were issued for both SSOs and neither incident
resulted in further enforcement action/penalties.
3. Fats, Oils and Grease Program: The permittee has developed and implements an educational fats, oils, and
grease program that includes at least bi-annual distribution of educational material targeted at both residential
and non-residential users. Educational materials were reviewed during the inspection and appeared to be
sufficient. Permittee records indicated the most recent distribution of educational material via mail occurred July
5, 2023. Educational materials are also maintained continuously online via the permittee's public website and
social media platforms. Additional educational materials and notices are sent as needed to any identified problem
areas. The permittee has also developed and implements an enforceable FOG program for non-residential users,
which is established by the Sewer Use Ordinance. FOG Program Coordinator Fernando Lopez had inspected each
non-residential user at least once within the past year. No written enforcement actions were taken within the
past year.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources D E Q
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NORTH CAROLINA
oe M—A or Enrif—unlal Quality 919.791.4200

Docusign Envelope ID: 3DC07736-62B9-4422-948D-5669B860A543
Page 2 of 3
4. Capital Improvement Plan: A Capital Improvement Plan was available for review during the inspection and
appeared to be compliant with permit requirements. The current CIP approximates a need of $65 million for the
entire department through 2033. Planned projects include new lift station installations, force main extensions,
system modeling, and various lift station improvements.
5. Contingency Plan for Pump Failure: A digital copy of the written contingency plan for pump failure was available
during the inspection and appeared to be compliant. The contingency plan included a contact list, diagrams,
troubleshooting instructions, and necessary equipment. Additionally, each lift station has a dedicated standby
power generator and bypass piping in place. Three additional portable generators are also available.
6. Pump Stations Inspected: The following pump stations were inspected: #13 at 3752 Louis Stephens Rd, #5 at
Keystone Duplex, and #12 at 4805 Hopson Rd. The inspector's observations noted in the next five items below
refer to the pump stations inspected. All inspected pump stations were checked for general condition, proper
operation and maintenance with appropriate recordkeeping, presence of debris, evidence of spills, and
operational standby power. No issues were noted.
7. Pump Station Signage: Each pump station has signage clearly and conspicuously posted that identifies the pump
station, provides an emergency 24-hour contact telephone number(s), and provides instructions for notification
if the visual alarm illuminates and/or the audible alarm sounds, or if an emergency is apparent.
8. Pump Station Restricted Access: All inspected pump station sites, equipment, and components were observed
to have restricted access via locked gated fences.
9. Pump Stations Automatic Polling Feature: Automatic polling was not present at this system. All pump stations
are equipped with telemetric alarms, which appeared to be operable during the inspection.
10. Pump Station High Water Alarms: High-water alarms were tested at each inspected pump station and appeared
to operate properly during the inspection.
11. Pump Station Inspection Program: The permittee has developed and implements a routine inspection program
of each pump station that includes the following maintenance activities: cleaning and removing debris from the
pump station area and wet well; inspecting all valves; inspecting pumps and other mechanical equipment; and
verifying the proper operation of the alarms, telemetry system, and auxiliary equipment. Inspection logs are
reviewed weekly and emergency/standby equipment are tested weekly by the permittee. Records related to
inspection and maintenance activities are maintained. The inspector reviewed the inspection logs of the pump
stations visited and observed adequate entries of the date and time of the operator's inspection, observations
made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken.
12. Designated Operators: The subject collection system is classified as a CS-3 system. The designated certified
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) is Wade Shaw (CS-3) and the back-up ORCs (BORCs) are Johnny Heard
(CS-3), Amy Jo Moore (CS-2), and Leslie Shifflett (CS-3). The certification status for each operator is reflected
as active in DWR's records.
13. Cleaning Sewer Lines: The permittee has developed and implements a program for cleaning the sewer lines. As
required by Section II.8 of the subject permit, at least 10% of the wastewater collection system should be
cleaned each year. Preventative cleaning is not required for sewer lines less than five years old, unless an
inspection reveals the need for cleaning. Line cleaning records were reviewed during the inspection and appeared
to be compliant with permit requirements.
D E ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
4Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Nprh C AOLINa 919.791.4200
Peparhnanf of Erm.onmaribl Ouali�

Docusign Envelope ID: 3DC07736-62B9-4422-948D-5669B860A543
Page 3 of 3
14. Spill Response Action Plan: A written Spill Response Action Plan was available for review during the inspection
and addressed the following minimum required items: 24-hour emergency response numbers, response time,
equipment list and spare parts inventory, access to cleaning equipment, access to construction
crews/contractors/engineers, source(s) of emergency funds, site restoration and cleanup materials, and post-
SSO assessment. The Spill Response Action Plan appeared to be compliant during the inspection.
15. SSO Records: The permittee has maintained adequate records pertaining to SSOs and sewer complaints for the
three-year period prior to the inspection. A list of reported SSOs, unreported SSOs, and complaints were
available, reviewed, and appeared to be compliant during the inspection.
16. Comprehensive Sewer Maw The permittee maintains an up-to-date comprehensive map of its sewer collection
system digitally via ArcGIS. The map includes pipe size, pipe material, pipe location, flow direction, approximate
pipe age, number of active service taps, and each pump station's identification, location, and capacity. The map
was reviewed during the inspection and appeared to be compliant.
17. Inspection of High Priority Lines: Section V. 4. of the subject permit requires all high priority sewer lines (HPLs)
to be inspected by the permittee at least once every six -months. According to reviewed records, all HPLs have
been inspected twice annually by a contractor. No deficiencies in routine inspection requirements were noted.
The following HPL was inspected (as applicable) for corrosion, misalignment, leaks, pylon condition,
bracket/brace condition, right of way maintenance, accessibility, and general compliance: HPL at UT to Burden's
Creek (stream crossing). No issues were noted during the inspection.
Conclusion
No violations or items of concern relative to the subject permit were noted during the inspection. No further action
is required.
Please be aware that DWR may take enforcement action against any individual who fails to comply with the
requirements of all applicable permits, regulations, and/or statutes. Pursuant to NC General Statute (NCGS) 143-
215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against any
person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit, or
applicable regulations, issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1.
If you need assistance, please contact Jesse Barnes at [phone] or [e-mail]. Thank you for
your time and assistance.
Sincerely,
ocuSigned by:
E�D
a. f. At.avu,u,(,2916E6AB32144F_
Vanessa E. Manuel, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Attachment(s):
Compliance Inspection Report, WQCS00038
Cc: Laserfiche Files
D E ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
4��Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NOR-H C AOLINa 919.791.4200
Deparhnanf of Erm.onmaribl Ouali�

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCS00038 Effective: 10/24/19 Expiration: 10/23/27 Owner : Durham County
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Durham County Collection System
County: Durham 5926 NC Hwy 55 E
Region: Raleigh
Durham NC 27713
Contact Person: Wendell Davis Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: CS3,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NC0026051 Durham County - Triangle WWTP
WQCS00005 City of Durham - Durham Collection System
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Entry Time 10:OOAM
Primary Inspector: Jesse Barnes
Secondary Inspector(s):
Exit Time: 12:OOPM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Collection system management and operation
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions General Sewer & FOG Ordinances
Capital Improvement Plan Map Reporting Requirements
Inspections Spill Response Plan Spills
Lines Manholes Pump Stations
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On June 27, 2024, Division of Water Resources (DWR) Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) staff Jesse Barnes conducted a
routine compliance evaluation inspection of the subject wastewater collection system to evaluate compliance with the
subject permit. ORC Wade Shaw was present during the inspection. A review of records, operations, maintenance, and
system components was completed. This review reflected compliance with the subject permit. Any permit violation(s),
item(s) of concern, and/or general observations are listed below. Inspection findings are detailed in the attached Compliance
Inspection Report.
General Observation Items
1. Permit Details: Version 4.0 of the subject permit is effective from October 24, 2019, until October 23, 2027. DWR
records indicate the wastewater collection system consists of approximately 105 miles of gravity sewer, 10.3 miles of force
main, and 13 duplex pump stations. The system appeared to be as described in the permit.
2. Reported Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs): During the 12-month period prior to the inspection, two SSOs were reportec
to DWR: Incident 202301115, 5,000 gal (3,000 gal to surface water) released from a manhole at 31 Alexandria Way due to
rags in the line and Incident 202301508, 180 gal released to surface water from 6909 Wexford Woods Trl due to pipe failure.
Notices of violation were issued for both SSOs and neither incident resulted in further enforcement action/penalties.
3. Fats, Oils and Grease Program: The permittee has developed and implements an educational fats, oils, and grease
program that includes at least bi-annual distribution of educational material targeted at both residential and non-residential
users. Educational materials were reviewed during the inspection and appeared to be sufficient Permittee records indicated
the most recent distribution of educational material via mail occurred July 5, 2023. Educational materials are also maintained
continuously online via the permittee's public website and social media platforms. Additional educational materials and
notices are sent as needed to any identified problem areas. The permittee has also developed and implements an
enforceable FOG program for non-residential users, which is established by the Sewer Use Ordinance. FOG Program
Coordinator Fernando Lopez had inspected each non-residential user at least once within the past year. No written
enforcement actions were taken within the past year.
4. Capital Improvement Plan: A Capital Improvement Plan was available for review during the inspection and appeared to b�
compliant with permit requirements. The current CIP approximates a need of $65 million for the entire department through
2033. Planned projects include new lift station installations, force main extensions, system modeling, and various lift station
improvements.
5. Contingency Plan for Pump Failure: A digital copy of the written contingency plan for pump failure was available during
the inspection and appeared to be compliant. The contingency plan included a contact list, diagrams, troubleshooting
instructions, and necessary equipment. Additionally, each lift station has a dedicated standby power generator and bypass
piping in place. Three additional portable generators are also available.
6. Pump Stations Inspected: The following pump stations were inspected: #13 at 3752 Louis Stephens Rd, #5 at Keystone
Duplex, and #12 at 4805 Hopson Rd. The inspector's observations noted in the next five items below refer to the pump
stations inspected. All inspected pump stations were checked for general condition, proper operation and maintenance with
appropriate recordkeeping, presence of debris, evidence of spills, and operational standby power. No issues were noted.
7. Pump Station Signage: Each pump station has signage clearly and conspicuously posted that identifies the pump
station, provides an emergency 24-hour contact telephone number(s), and provides instructions for notification if the visual
alarm illuminates and/or the audible alarm sounds, or if an emergency is apparent.
8. Pump Station Restricted Access: All inspected pump station sites, equipment, and components were observed to have
restricted access via locked gated fences.
9. Pump Stations Automatic Polling Feature: Automatic polling was not present at this system. All pump stations are
Page 2 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
equipped with telemetric alarms, which appeared to be operable during the inspection.
10. Pump Station High Water Alarms: High-water alarms were tested at each inspected pump station and appeared to
operate properly during the inspection.
11. Pump Station Inspection Program: The permittee has developed and implements a routine inspection program of each
pump station that includes the following maintenance activities: cleaning and removing debris from the pump station area
and wet well; inspecting all valves; inspecting pumps and other mechanical equipment; and verifying the proper operation of
the alarms, telemetry system, and auxiliary equipment. Inspection logs are reviewed weekly and emergency/standby
equipment are tested weekly by the permittee. Records related to inspection and maintenance activities are maintained. The
inspector reviewed the inspection logs of the pump stations visited and observed adequate entries of the date and time of the
operator's inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken.
12. Designated Operators: The subject collection system is classified as a CS-3 system. The designated certified Operator
in Responsible Charge (ORC) is Wade Shaw (CS-3) and the back-up ORCs (BORCs) are Johnny Heard (CS-3), Amy Jo
Moore (CS-2), and Leslie Shifflett (CS-3). The certification status for each operator is reflected as active in DWR's records.
13. Cleaning Sewer Lines: The permittee has developed and implements a program for cleaning the sewer lines. As requirec
by Section 11.8 of the subject permit, at least 10% of the wastewater collection system should be cleaned each year.
Preventative cleaning is not required for sewer lines less than five years old, unless an inspection reveals the need for
cleaning. Line cleaning records were reviewed during the inspection and appeared to be compliant with permit requirements.
14. Spill Response Action Plan: A written Spill Response Action Plan was available for review during the inspection and
addressed the following minimum required items: 24-hour emergency response numbers, response time, equipment list and
spare parts inventory, access to cleaning equipment, access to construction crews/contractors/engineers, source(s) of
emergency funds, site restoration and cleanup materials, and post-SSO assessment. The Spill Response Action Plan
appeared to be compliant during the inspection.
15. SSO Records: The permittee has maintained adequate records pertaining to SSOs and sewer complaints for the
three-year period prior to the inspection. A list of reported SSOs, unreported SSOs, and complaints were available, reviewed,
and appeared to be compliant during the inspection.
16. Comprehensive Sewer Map: The permittee maintains an up-to-date comprehensive map of its sewer collection system
digitally via ArcGIS. The map includes pipe size, pipe material, pipe location, flow direction, approximate pipe age, number of
active service taps, and each pump station's identification, location, and capacity. The map was reviewed during the
inspection and appeared to be compliant.
17. Inspection of High Priority Lines: Section V. 4. of the subject permit requires all high priority sewer lines (HPLs) to be
inspected by the permittee at least once every six -months. According to reviewed records, all HPLs have been inspected
twice annually by a contractor. No deficiencies in routine inspection requirements were noted. The following HPL was
inspected for corrosion, misalignment, leaks, pylon condition, bracket/brace condition, right of way maintenance,
accessibility, and general compliance: HPL at UT to Burden's Creek (stream crossing). No issues were noted during the
inspection.
Conclusion
No violations or items of concern relative to the subject permit were noted during the inspection. No further action is required.
Page 3 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
General Yes No NA NE
Is there a properly designated primary ORC and at least one back-up of proper grade? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are logs being reviewed by the system management or owner on a regular basis? ❑ ❑ ❑
# What is that frequency?
# Are there any issues being addressed currently or any in the planning stages? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there a specific pump failure plan available for all pump stations? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does plan indicate if pump parts/new pumps are in spare parts/equipment inventory? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are new/significantly upgraded pump stations equipped with anti -corrosion materials? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the permittee have a copy of their permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is permit expiring within the next 6 months? ❑ ❑ ❑
If Yes, has the Permittee applied for renewal? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Sewer and FOG Ordinances
Yes No NA NE
Is Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) or other Legal Authority available?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there a Grease Control Program that legally requires grease control devices?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
What is the standard grease trap cleaning requirement in the FOG ordinance?
Is Grease Control Program enforced via periodic inspections/records review?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is action taken against violators?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Have satellite systems adopted an equivalent or more stringent ordinance?
❑
❑ ❑
Is grease/sewer education program documented with req'd customer distribution?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Are other types of education tools used like websites, booths, special meetings, etc?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
If Yes, what are they? (This can reduce mailing to annual.)
Permittee website and social media.
Comment:
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No NA NE
Has a Capital (CIP) or System Improvement Plan been developed and adopted? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is it designated for wastewater only or does it have a dedicated section? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP cover three to five year period of earmarked improvements? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of project area? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of existing facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include known deficiencies? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include forecasted future needs? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Map Yes No NA NE
Page 4 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is there a overall sewer system map?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the map include:
Pipe Type (GS/FM)
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Pipe sizes
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Pipe materials (PVC, DIP, etc)
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Pipe location
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Flow direction
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Approximate pipe age
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station ID, location and capacity
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Force main air release valve location & type
❑
❑ ❑
# Location of satellite connections
❑
❑ ❑
Is the map being updated for changes/additions within 1 year of activation?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Reporting Requirements Yes No NA NE
# Have there been any sewer spills in the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑
If Yes, were they reported to the Division if meeting the reportable criteria? ❑ ❑ ❑
If applicable, is there documentation of press releases and public notices issued? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is an Annual Wastewater Performance Report being filed with the Division, if required? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the report being made available to all its sewer customers? ❑ ❑ ❑
# How is it being made available?
Comment:
Inspections
Yes No NA NE
Are adequate maintenance records maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are pump stations being inspected at the required frequency?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is at least one complete functionality test conducted weekly per pump station?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is there a system or plan in place to observe the entire system annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the annual inspection documented?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the system have any high -priority lines/locations?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are inspections of HPL documented at least every 6 months?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are new lines being added to the HPL list when found or created?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Spill Response Action Plan Yes No NA NE
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel? ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the plan include:
Page 5 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
24-hour contact numbers
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Response time
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Equipment list and spare parts inventory
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Access to cleaning equipment
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Source of emergency funds
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Site sanitation and cleanup materials
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Post-overflow/spill assessment
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the Permittee appear to respond within 2 hours of first knowledge of a spill?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
$RiL Yes No NA NE
Is system free of known points of bypass? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If No, describe type of bypass and location
Are all spills or sewer related issues/complaints documented? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there repeated overflows/problems (2 or more in 12 months) at same location? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# If Yes, is there a corrective action plan? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerial Lines Yes No NA NE
Please list the Lines/Right of Ways/Aerial Lines Inspected:
Stream crossing HPL at UT to Burden's Creek
Are right-of-ways/easements maintained for full width for access by staff/equipment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If No, give details on temporary access:
Is maintenance documented? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are gravity sewer cleaning records available? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has at least 10% of lines older than 5 yrs been cleaned annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Were all areas/lines inspected free of issues? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Manholes
Yes No NA NE
Please list the Manholes Inspected:
T-22-007, T-22-008
Are manholes accessible?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Are manhole covers/vents above grade?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of visible signs of overflow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of sinkholes and depressions?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manhole covers present?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Are manholes properly seated?
❑ ❑ ❑
Page 6 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
# Are manholes in good condition?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Are inverts in good condition?
❑
❑ ❑
Is flow unrestricted in manholes?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of excessive amounts of grease?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of excessive roots?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of excessive sand?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are manhole vents screened?
❑
❑ ❑
Are vents free of submergence?
❑
❑ ❑
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Pump Stations
Yes No NA NE
Please list the Pump Stations Inspected:
PS #13 3752 Louis Stephens Rd, PS #5 Keystone Duplex, PS #12 4805 Hopson Rd
# Number of duplex or larger pump stations in system
13
# Number of vacuum stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system serving more than one building
How many pump/vacuum stations have:
# A two-way "auto polling" communication system (SCADA) installed?
# A simple one-way telemetry/communication system (auto -dialer) installed?
13
For pump stations inspected:
Are they secure with restricted access?
❑ ❑ ❑
Were they free of by-pass structures/pipes?
❑ ❑ ❑
Were wet wells free of excessive grease/debris?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Do they all have telemetry installed?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the communication system functional?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted ?
❑ ❑ ❑
Does the sign include:
Owner Name?
❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Address?
❑ ❑ ❑
Instructions for notification?
❑ ❑ ❑
24-hour emergency contact numbers?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is there a backup generator or bypass pump connected?
❑ ❑ ❑
Page 7 of 8

Permit: WQCS00038 Owner - Facility: Durham County
Inspection Date: 06/27/2024 Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
If tested during inspection, did it function properly?
Is the back-up system tested at least bi-annually under normal operating conditions?
# Does it have a dedicated connection for a portable generator?
# Is the owner relying on portable units in the event of a power outage?
# If Yes, is there a distribution plan?
If Yes, what resources (Units/Staff/Vehicles/etc) are included in Plan?
# Does Permittee have the approved percentage of replacement simplex pumps?
Is recordkeeping of pump station inspection and maintenance program adequate?
Do pump station logs include at a minimum:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Comment:
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
❑❑❑■
❑❑❑■
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 8 of 8