820729_Routine Inspection_20240806

of Visit:
for Visit:
0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: f CtGary Owner Email:
Owner r
Owner Name: �t 24'C9) �Gtaz /Qew) Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,�Z¢c i�G Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: & /�vt1✓L�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Region: /� Ato
Phone:
Certification Number: / // �-y
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Illsu' jlij{a�f�t E,
11 III l�7��{Sts�`',, Ei'=�E'ry! �I
li
1
I�t#f!�1i GiG
Wean to Finish
ij Layer
Dai Coiw t
Wean to Feeder
17, ij Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
S DD ;IMP
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
'�y [! Its[ ��tl ��t�
'C f
!i�i ��i...
D Cow
Farrow to Feederui
;i k
+ I Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
'1 Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
IPullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
a
ITurkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑'go ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes.,,�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes__[;�FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yesj:jP(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway):
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
'�3
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
';D-No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes .E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes AE]' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ❑"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes „❑'Flo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes,,[ -No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑/Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ��iJ��iA �q ()eAffd5' S&O
13. Soil Type(s):
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes -[allo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
.�
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
.❑moo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[-]Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes,,?I-No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E' No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
/[244o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
I� No
J'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: <�j�(/i3S %J
Date: lJ /46-
Page 3 of 3 511212020

racmty NO.Time In Time out
n ^t—
Farm Name
w Integrator
Owner
Site Rep
Operator
No.
Back-up
No.
uOC Circle: General or NPDES
t•KtESOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test i. Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard Z�— Daily Rainfall
SpraylFreeboar4 Drop
Weather Codes 4,— 120 min Inspections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
�. aT y a 3d
_S /i0/2-/ 2_,16
Date
Sludge Survey V113%-3 3�
Calibration/GPM 1Gd 1
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)