20051225 Ver 2_Application_20080104

.. `y
~~~lfl/; ~~ ~ CC~P~C.~I
O

~~3d.~
u5-~aasv~
~~~
January 4, 2008 ~ ~~~ s ~~~~
D ~"
.:
Ms. Cyndi Karoly ~I~~v 4 ~~~".~
Wetlands Program Development Unit
401/Wetlands Unit yy~'tgPIDSANDSTORi~iNA~~;~.~''"~"*'~'
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Dear Ms. Karoly:
The City of Raleigh is pleased to submit (one copy to USACE and 7 copies to DWQ) copies of the Pre-
construction Notification (PCN) application form and a check in the amount of $570.00 made out to
"N.C. Division of Water Quality" to obtain applicable US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section
404 permits and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications for the proposed Fred J. Fletcher Extended
Detention Wetland Project. The project was conceived by the City of Raleigh to address non-point source
pollution in the Pigeon House Branch watershed, which is subject to a recent Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) allocation and to the Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy. This unique
project is part of a watershed-wide initiative that has been undertaken by the City to improve water
quality in Pigeon House Branch, the City's most impaired waterbody. The City's proposed efforts have
been recognized with $1.4 million in financial assistance from the 319(h) program and from the Clean
Water Management Trust Fund for nonpoint source pollution and streambank stabilization projects
planned for the watershed. The City is being assisted in the design of the extended detention wetland
project by Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM). The City has involved staff from both the USACE and North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
throughout the design process, including Monte Matthews (USACE), Thomas Brown (USACE), John
Dorney (DWQ) ,Eric Kulz (DWQ), and Amy Chapman (DWQ).
Project Purpose and Need
CDM completed a study of the five-square-mile Pigeon House Branch Watershed on behalf of the City of
Raleigh in 1994 as part of the City's ongoing stormwater management program. The study identified
recommendations for structural and nonstructural improvements that may be made in the watershed to
alleviate existing and projected future stormwater problems related to flooding, streambank erosion, and
water quality. As part of the study, CDM identified candidate sites in the watershed that would
potentially be suitable for the construction of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to improve
water quality in the watershed. Fred Fletcher Park is located in the Pigeon House Branch watershed as
shown on Figure 1.
Following the completion of the Pigeon House Branch study, the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission adopted new rules to support the implementation of the Neuse River Nutrient
Page 1
OFFICES 222 WEST HARGETT STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 590 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27602
RECYCLED PAPER

r, ~'
,.
''
.,.,
. ~ti >

;~
Fred J. Fletcher Extended Detention Wetland Project
January 4, 2008
Sensitive Waters Management Strategy (the Neuse Rules). These rules require select municipalities in
the Neuse River Basin to take steps to reduce nitrogen pollution coming form non-point sources by 30%
from 1995 levels through the use of newly constructed and retrofit water quality facilities.
In addition, since 1998, the Pigeon House Branch watershed has been listed on the State of North
Carolina's 303(d) list as non-supporting due to levels of copper, fecal coliform, and low dissolved
oxygen. This listing led to the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocation for the
Pigeon House Branch, which was published in June 2003 by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality and approved by US EPA. The TMDL
identified combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, cross-connections of sanitary sewers to
storm sewers, illegal dumping, non-human wastes, urban development, and abraded brake pads as the
possible sources of pollutants in the watershed.
Faced with these new and pending requirements, the City proceeded with the development of another
study, the Pigeon House Branch Updated Water Quality Improvement Plan (CDM, 2001) to identify
comprehensive cost-effective stormwater best management practices to address flooding and water
quality concerns in Pigeon House Branch. The study considered the following key elements:
^ Assessment of twelve potential stormwater detention sites for flood attenuation and/or water quality
improvement;
^ Identification of streambank stabilization and rehabilitation needs to reduce sediment loads;
^ Investigation of on-site controls for ten industrial and commercial sites to reduce nonpoint source
pollution; and
^ Development of neighborhood education programs as nonstructural source controls for nonpoint
source pollution.
Elements of each these activities are being implemented by the City. The City has also undertaken a
comprehensive fecal coliform tracing study and a systematic sanitary sewer rehabilitation program to
identify and control likely sources of fecal coliform bacteria.
Alternatives Evaluation
The Pigeon House Branch watershed is almost completely developed and much of the existing
development pre-dates existing stormwater management regulations. As a result, siting potential
structural best management practices in an effort to reduce nonpoint source pollution and address known
watershed stressors has been a challenge. The 2001 Water Quality Improvement Plan identified twelve
candidate sites in the watershed for the construction of wet ponds or dry ponds; five of these sites were
found to have adequate capacity for the construction of a wet detention pond, selected as the preferred
practice for the reduction of total nitrogen in accordance with the Neuse River Nutrient Management
Strategy.
Using abenefit-cost analysis, the best management practice proposed at Fred Fletcher Park was
determined to have the most favorable benefit-cost ratio of the five feasible sites and was selected for
implementation by the City. In 2005, the City received a 319(H) grant from NC DENR via US EPA for
the construction and monitoring of the project. During preliminary design, the proposed wet detention
pond was reconfigured as an extended detention wetland to comply with the City's Master Plan for Fred
Fletcher Park and to meet project hydraulic design criteria.
Page 2

r~
Fred J. Fletcher Extended Detention Wetland Project
January 4, 2008
Proposed Project
The proposed Fred Fletcher Park extended detention constructed wetland would function as a multi-
objective facility, serving as an aesthetic water feature and critical element of the park's master plan while
also helping the City improve water quality in the Pigeon House Branch watershed by controlling runoff
from 48 acres of park lands, single and multifamily residential, paved parking lots, and public streets land
uses. The facility is designed to reduce the primary pollutants of concern noted in the TMDL and the
Neuse River Nutrient Management Strategy -fecal coliform, copper, and total nitrogen. It will treat
runoff from the first one inch of runoff and would have captured 86% of all historical rain events between
1948 and 2004 and approximately 80% of all rainfall volume over that same time period.
The proposed extended detention constructed wetland at Fred J. Fletcher Park is a key element in the City
of Raleigh's strategy to develop awatershed-based solution to nonpoint source pollution in the Pigeon
House Branch watershed, and represents one of the first retrofit projects undertaken by the City. The
project has been supported by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, the City of Raleigh Public Works Department, the City of Raleigh Parks~and
Recreation Department, and the surrounding community. We look forward to your endorsement of the
proposed project. Please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or our engineer, Brenan
Buckley, P.E., of CDM at [phone] if you have any questions about the project.
Thank you for your consideration of this important project.
Sincerely,
~lYt/~"~
Cki,~
Danny Bowden
Stormwater Program Manager
City of Raleigh Stormwater Management Division
Page 3

Figure 1
Fletcher Park Project
Pigeon House Branch Watershed and Project Location

~~P~~
,~
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. D S~ t a a s v z
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
~3'o3d.~
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide #27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c p ~~. ~s ., ~., .W` 1
~4 _m., ;lPx
II. Applicant Information
~~~~` ~ zoos
Owner/Applicant Information
OePih~ . bow ~ k t~UHLl7't
Name: Mr. Carl R. Dawson, Jr. P.E. ~rri~~os~NOSroaa~wA~~~~~ n~cw
Mailing Address: City of Raleigh Public Works Department
P.O. BOX 590
Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
Telephone Number: 919-890-3030 Fax Number: 919-890-3832
E-mail Address: carl.dawson(a~ci.raleigh.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. J. Brenan Buckley, P.E.
Company Affiliation: CDM
Mailing Address: 5400 Glenwood Ave. Ste. 300
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: 919-787-5620 Fax Number: 919-781-5730
E-mail Address: buckleyjb(a~cdm.com
Page 5 of 13

r
r 'i1 •~.r~ ~A'..f .~ /5

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fred Fletcher Park Extended Detention Wetland
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Tax Parcel ID # 1704432648
4. Location
County: Wake County Nearest Town: City of Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Located on Glenwood
Ave. approximately 0.35 miles south of the intersection of Glenwood and Wade Ave.
Site is located in Fred Fletcher Park, which is adjacent to Washington Street.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7926 °N -78.6472 °W
6. Property size (acres): Deeded Parcel Acres = 8.37 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed tributary of Pigeon House Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin (in Crabtree Creek watershed)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site consists of park features with a small wooded area
surrounding a short reach of stream at the confluence of the watershed at Glenwood Ave.
Land use is primarilypark land with collector streets and small areas of single family
multifamily housing and office/institutional zones.
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project includes construction of an extended detention wetland at the lower end of the park,
just upstream of Glenwood Ave. The wetland has been designed to capture and treat the first
flush (approximately 1.0 inches of rain). The wetland will include an open pool foreba~,
upper marsh and lower marsh. The project also includes piping and stabilization of a small
drainage channel upstream of the wetland to repair downcutting and reduce sediment loading
to the wetland. Equipment used for the project will be a backhoe, front-loader, dump truck
and trenching equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The Pigeon House Branch watershed has been
listed on the State's 303(d) list for since 1998 as non-supporting.due to levels of copper, fecal
coliforms and low dissolved oxygen. A TMDL has also been issues for the watershed. The
site is also located within the Neuse River basin and represents a retrofit opportunity to
reduce total nitrogen. The Citesperformed a watershed study to determine the most cost
effective sites for BMPs. The study ranked the Fred Fletcher park site as the most beneficial
in terms of cost and removal capabilities. The wetland would treat runoff from approximately
50 acres of land in the basin.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. The City has engaged the permitting agencies throughout the design
process. However, no prior permits have been issued for this project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future work is anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Page7of13

Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The project involves the creation of
an extended detention wetland that would impact approximately 184 feet of Intermittent stream
as defined in May 2007 using the DWQ stream I.D. form, included in the PCN packet. The
remaining stream reach impacted b~project is Ephemeral. There is no wetland impact
associated with this project.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
No impacts

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: No wetland
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
UT to Pigeon Permanent Impact
1 House Branch from Wetland Intermittent 8 feet 184 0.034
Creation

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 184 0.034
Page 8 of 13

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact

(acres)
No impacts

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.034
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.034
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 184
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation (note: proposed project is an extended detention wetland)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ®stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): The proiect is an extended detention wetland;
Construction will include excavation of wetland area and forebav. Also, construction of a
riser structure to inundate the wetland.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): The project is an extended detention wetland; it will
serve as a non-point stormwater runoff control BMP to reduce pollutant loadings to 303(d)
listed stream with a TMDL
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: City-owned park
Size of watershed draining to pond: 47.8 acres Expected pond surface area: 0.83 acres
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
Page 9 of 13

financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The Pigeon House Branch
watershed is the most highly developed watershed in the City of Raleigh with minimal
opportunities for stormwater retrofits. The City performed an analysis of 12 alternative sites for
implementation of BMPs to improve water quality in Pigeon House Branch, which is listed on
the State's 303(d) list and has a TMDL. The Fred Fletcher Park site ranked as the #1 alternative
on a cost/benefit analysis when compared to the other 11 sites.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
andlor map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is required. City staff met with Amy Chapman and John Dorney from DWQ
on 25 June 2007. It was verbally a rg eed upon that with this project, considered as a wetland
restoration project, would not be required to re-establish buffers around the perimeter of the
wetland.
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
Page 11 of 13

buffer multipliers. The impact to each zone was calculated by using the 184 linear feet of
intermittent stream defined by the DWQ, and offsetting each zone by 30 feet and 20 feet on
either side of the stream bank. The areas formed by zones 1 and 2 are illustrated in the
attached Existing Site Conditions plan sheet.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 11,040 3 (2 for Catawba) Exempt
2 7,360 1.5 Exempt
Total 18,400 Exempt
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. The City of Raleigh has discussed the
proposed proiect with the Division of Water Oualitv. specifically Amv Chapman and John
Dorney - it is DWQ's interpretation that the proposed project is a wetland restoration project
and as such is an allowed use and no buffer mitigation will be required.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious .surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Approximately 34% of the existing 47.8-acre
watershed is impervious. which represents nearly 708.000 sauare feet. As Hart of this proiect. a
walking path constructed with asphalt will be installed to provide foot traffic adjacent to the
wetland. The path will be 6-feet wide by 340-feet in length (total area = 2,040 square feet). This
represents less than a 0.3 percent increase in the total impervious surface percentage for the
watershed. Runoff from this additional impervious area will be treated by the proposed extended
detention wetland.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Page 12 of 13

Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
;,
r'
,.~ f' ,
~ ~ ~;~ t
Applicant/Agent's Signature ©,~~ ~ ~/~ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization le er from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

0 100 200 400 600 Feet
l i i i l l i i l i i i l
N
~ ton St Jefferson St
dashing
0
E
Adams St
Fred J. Fletcher
Extended Wetland
Detention Project Area Q
a
0
0
3
c
C7
N~
N
N
r
I~
Cleveland St ~~
Tilden St

CDM
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Fred J. Fletcher
Extended Wetland Detention
~ uevereux a[
m
0
m
Z
Hinsdale St

TOPO! map printed on 11/13/07 from "North Carolina.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg"
/ti"4U.000' W /ti":i9,000' W /tJ"3ti,000' W WGSij4 /ti"3/,UUU' W
~.,,
1 11t A~~~ P~ i~L~'rs ~'~3ai3~r~ `:A .~i u i . .~. 1 __
~'.
~,~..~,.

Y `

' ''
'' .
~„~ ~{ \ ,psi ~?
E ~lorrt~ i ~-^
- t
f A , ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,t
i
~

~
1
~ ~h J~ 0.1'~'yiaP ~
S ~` ~
* ~ ~.~ i
. '
~
~4 t N~
/ Yc~ Y .M` ~ ~
A
i

/~
~s_
_-
f '~

i.
' _ ~ ~ ~ ~+~ Ka~teiv~
-
~
~ A~ .. ~
qtr/"
r-~ .~
t"ti > i
,jr~ `
,e
~ ~
s it
~
~
b
'~!~f~~' `~ ~ Fred J. Fletcher
~,~T',
Extended Wetland ~~ ,~
`` ~ .,~~
'
~ --~ ~ ~~-~'
Detention Project Area i i~'~°~ ~~

MN ~TN v i actc
g" ~04P FEEI U 541 t~DO MFT[fl5
Printed from TOPO! ®2001 National Geograpluc Holdings (www.topo.com)
z
O
O
O
7
0
m
z
0
0
0
0
M
z
0
0
0
a
n
z
a
n

fCeG2 CeB�, `kF \\ 11 Ap al
ro Cc\ vo j }• vCr ���, L' CeC2 r /
eQ
\ Cm / CeD' Q C G2 C
Apl) _Y / CJ C h ,
Cm
Cg
eel) CeC2 ��°' � ,..•
WkL
Cm t Ce8?
ep ! Co —
\I 1 Cm p
APD CeC2 �AfA _—� Cm \ i CeC2, N
CeQ + '
!, k.
CcU
` %
fq �t' fi�D2. 1 � F r��Bu Ro
A
'Calf? U .� /
Cel / i Q�aP? ,'r ♦.• Qu :� / M@
,t CeC2
Cm �. �r,•
i e
Cb W x
\ F' w , ' � � P 1 Ma
eel
CeC2 Cer"2 1
AfA
eel) Ma
\� �S, Cm Cm
` IIre/ _\� B2 � \ - _
CeC2 _ -
CCC2� - ��09, CCC2 j Fe82
/ PeB2
lU Ceb \ Cel'hnL'2 Ma WkE e `
1a t t .'AfA Me Co
i tl t
Cob., \ APC? 1 i U
hl t}n.
Cee - h CeC2 / , t
� nnCz s
CeB2 G�lr 4pB2 ♦°L
_/ • ; 'Y W o
• -CeC2 � % t � �� 3s v
S r.
COB?'
CeD CCC? \ AIX2 ` 1 Gu PQ zQ
:!A \ �8�{�; �_h •'. �.•i I ! r r � Cefi2 ''� ��Y �'co r � / Ma
f 'C2 ..
( '^v � �'�� q: s r;l CeB2 •� ,,+
` 4�\ f Ceb
VALE) � r Apo?
4••
CeC2 t,.. Ce�2 \ : r• C AP(2 %'3( �.' .�� APD
'Mddf,,�..
epi llL'eC2 ApC?tti' yoJ /` ��,/ eot�'i
Till
CeB2
CeB2 i
CO2!
1 �v
Ce02 ' Ma
CeC2 Cm
Fred J. Fletcher quCr
` ceQ \ Extended Wetland ApC2 Apuz
...... Detention Project
Me T... r Area E` • t \
Ca/ Ci Ma
eQ
A
I
CeB2 CeQ \\ . �P ' a ? �c,1 APB r . Ceci"C }
eC P CeC2 I %' h�1z�1 �' f:� �. Ma IN
APCZ
CeD
� CeC2 i 101 r 1 a• j ,� a � f Q
3
Figure 3.
Cecz Wake County Soil Survey
cec
f
Fred J. Fletcher
Extended Detention
�c'» ¢J'f`p!`,4 ' Wetland Vicinity Map
t�eC2

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: FIC~Cha Park- ~q/~`d ~ Latitude:
Evaluator: ~L. vor-c Site: o~ ~ ~ ~`~~_ Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent Z 3 County: W~.k~- e.g. Quad Name:
it 2 19 or erennia! i1 Z 30
A. Geomorphology ~Subt
1a. Continuous bed and bank
r = -=----
sent Weak Moderate
0 1 - --_ __2 _____
i c. onwusuy ~ Q j ~ 2 3
~3. In channel structure: rifne-pool sequence
~e~~ 1
~ 2
~- 3
~' 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ~
0 1 2 j 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ___
_ _
1
0 1
, 2 ~ 3
~ 6. Depositional bars or benches _
~ 0 _ _
_
j ~2 3
7 Braided channel
--- j 0 ,
~ 1 i 2 3

8. Recent alluvial deposits --

~ 0
---
1 ' ,
-- - -
2 ? -

3
CQ a Nah iral lavaac ~ n - ~ ~ i o - -_-- ~
~_ 10. Headcuts 0 1 _ !_ 2
_ _ .- - __.
11. Grade controls l _ „ - 0.5 ' ___ 1 1.5
~ 12. Natural valley or drainageway ~ 0 0.5 r 1 1.
13. Second or greater order channel on xi in j ~
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No =~ j Yes = 3 r
evidence. ( ~ ~
Man-made dllches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav fSuhtntal = 1
f 14. Groundwater flow/discharge_
' 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, Q
~ Water in channel -- dry
or growing season ! 0

0
I __ _ 1

~ 1 2 j 3

2 ~ 3
_
_
16. Leaflitter
___ _.
17
S
di -- --- ---
1 1.5

--
1 ~ ~..
0.5 ~ O Ej

_.__.
- --

~
.
e
ment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 .5
!
18.Organtc debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 j 1.5
19. liydric soils redoxtmor htc features resent? ~
_ _ _ _
_
No
_ 0 _ _ _
Yes = 1.5 .~
C. Biololav (Subtotal = ) ~
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1
---
21 . Rooted plants in channel

_ ____
-----
~ 22. Crayfish
_ - --- ---
-- --_
3

-. _ __

~
-
2

__

5 ~
----- -----
1 i 0

--

1 ( 1.5
~ 23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 .5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance} 0 i 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ': 1 2 3 '
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ~ 0.5 1 i 1.5 -
_
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed ~ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquallc or wetland plants. '~
w~~
~vgtch•
Notes: (use back side of this farm for additional notes.)

• ~ G~~
e~ ~'~
~d
~~;+
~ G

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: v awf~-
~ ~ ~ p~ Project: ~t r-, Latitude:
Evaluator: ~ ~Crovvz Site: u~ ~'e~ b ~ „~ Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent +l ~ 5 County: ~ ~ ~ e.g. Quad Name'
i/ 2 19 or erennial i12 30 1 YY!! '
--
A. Geomorphology_~subtotal = Absent _
Weak _ -- -
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuous bed and bank ~ 0 j ` 2 i 3
~ 2 Sinuosity ~ 0 ~
-- ------ - --- 1 '~ 2 '
3 ~
r
3 In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ` _ ___
4
S
if
~ A 1 2 _ _
_ 3
~
.
o
texture or stream substrate sorting 1 j 2 3
- -----

5. Active/relic floodplain I

1

~
_ ___
3

6. Depositional bars or benches i 0 1 j 2 ! 3
7
Braided channel
0
G- ---
_ _ _ I I ~
I
8. Recent alluvial de osits I 0
p
--- - ----
- --~
e
9 N
t
l l ----- 1 2 ._ -
_
a
ura
evees i _
_-___
_._._. -
Headcuts 0 ~
10 ~ 1

1 2

2 _ ___3
.
,_ _ _._
___ _
~_. __ I__._ -Q__
12. N to a site I or drains ewa _ 0
_ Y 9 ___ Y
~ ~ __ ~

0.5 ~ _

1

1
~

1.5

_ 1.5
~~ -
13. Second or greater order channel on xistin
~ USGS or NRCS map or other documented ~ No =~ ~ Yes = 3
~ evidence. ~ i
man-made ai[cnes are not rates; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav fSu6total = 1
--
14. Groundwater flowldischarge _ __
0
1
2
3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, Q ____ _
0
~ ©
2 ___
3
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
! 16. Leafl~tter 1. 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
1~ 8.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack Ilnes) _ _
0.5 1 1.5
119. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.
C. Biolotav lSubtotal =

_
- --
20 . Fibrous roots in channel

3
_
2
v__ _~_

0
2~Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
i_ 22. Crayfish

_-.__.._....--
23. Bivalves _ __ _

0.5
---~ -1 -

1
2
.. ---
1.5
3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 i 1 1.5
~ 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ( 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
i 29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
uems zu and zi rotas on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants
Rtzalch~
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
\~C
`~~rUl
N~
~,,,,r

(9HY-'Lti-LUUb h K l l U~ LH H("I UCIVK KKU
\o~pr r• ' c9QG
~ ~
.r --I
Q -C
rrln lvu. t~t~~r I~tr to ~ . ~~
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
~lorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
Division of Water duality
April 24, 2006
J. Brenan Bucklay,
Camp Dresser & N
5400 Crlenwood A~
Raleigh, NC 2761:
ax Note 7671
Post-its F Dare C" G pages ~ S
**
To ~ RV 3~J I p y J s 0'~ .. From r~(t~ v ~Z
co.~oept. r~ f+
~ co.
Phone q Pho~~e u ~ / !. f Z' O
k
Fox ~ - 5~? 3o Fax ~ .~ _~ ~
N>s~o a6-o9s
County: Wake
BASIN:
Neusc X Tar-Pamlico
(l5A NCAC 2B .0233) (15A NCAC 213 .0259)
Complaint NOV Huffer Detet~nination X
Incident # Appear Call
Project Name: Fred Fletcher hark Water t"eature
LocatioNDireetions: Site is located at the southwest corner of the interseetlon of GlCnwood Avenue and
Washington Street In Raleigh.
Subiect Stream; UT to Pi¢eon House Branch
Dlato of Determination: 4/19/06
Feature Start Buffer
t3PS Points (if provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Surve Located on
USGS
To o ra hie
A Subject at "8tart A" Flag X
B Not 8ub,~ect X
C Not Subject 7C
This determination shall expiieJlve (S) years from the date oJthls latter, Landowners or ajjected parties that
disp,tte a rleterminatlon made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is
subJect to the bt{rfer rule,nr{y request a determinatlon by t1,e Director. A re7uest jar a delerminatlo„ by the
Director shall be rejeried to the Director fn wrtrtng c% Cyndl Karoly, DWQ Wetniids/~I01 Unlt, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd, RalelgJ,, NC 77604-7x60. Individuals that dispute n delarmination 6y the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surjoce waterjrom the bttJ, jrer role may ask for an ad Jrtdicatory bearing. FoN ,mrst
act wJN,ln 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Apptica„ts are berehy „ot(Jled that t/ie b0-day sralarory
appeal 1}me does not start until the q/fected party (lticludhrg downstream and adjacent landowners) Is „ot~ed of
this dectsios. 17WQ recomtnenrls that the applicant conduct this rrot~cation In order ro be certa/n that thbd
party appeals are made in a timely manner: Tv askjor a hearing, sand a written petition, wl,tch cor,forn,s ro
Chapter 1 SOB ojthe North Carolina General Statutes to the OjJlce of Ad»itnistratlve Nearl>sgs, 67141Ka11
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 77699.6714. This detenf,U,etia„ lsJinal and bltrding unless you ask jot a hearing
within 6o days.
t`nrth Carolina Division of Vtator Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Wmtcr Protection Phone (9l9) 79J •A200 Customer Service
Inlemat h2a.enrs;lam.ne.~~s Ib7R Mail Rnrvir~ f'rnrrr nalrioh Ur ~7600.1h91t ~4Y /QIQ1 S7t_d910 1.049 RD9 R7e0
iVo`~t1lCsrolj:
~~~ttrr2 ~:

1'IH1r-Lti-LUUt) f K l l U~ JU HI'I UCI1K KKU r nn t~~• s a t au ~ t •+ i t u ~• ~~
Page 2 of 2
Thc• (owner/falure owners) s/:mild note the lsivisios, of Water Quality (inclr,ding a,ey ot/rdv L~ ocal, Stare, and
Ft:de,wl Agencies) ojthis declslott concetv,ing any future correspondences regarding ti:e suh}ect property (stated
above). This pro, jeet may require a See#on 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any tngufrles should be
rllrected to the DivfsJon of Water Quality (Ce„tral Office) at (919)-733-1986, and tl,e CIS Army Corp ojE»gineers
(12aletgh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-h441.
CC: 'File Copy
Cenhal Filas
DWQ Watlands and Stormwate>• Branch
Ben Brown -City of Raleigh
Or.~
No iCar~.
Rt/lC~.
"~urlh Corulina Division of Watar Quality RwlciQh Regional Oftlcc Surface 1Valcr Protecuun Phonc [phone] Customer Servica
~..Iu.nuP h9n en- stets nr oa ~ F2R lvtnit Srrvice Censer Mleizl-, h'C 27499-1628 FAX [phone].523.6748

MAY-26-2006 FKl 1U~31 A(9 U~NK KKU rHn ivu, iai~nri4+in r, ~~
u(~uc.ut-c - i uc ., cu a 1 uNu~iaNutL _vtaN
uu~:.; www.wpuaune.cu[rvprin~.a~p:~°i ~o;.n=~vo~~va.yyyts ~ lA~c

Ratatgfi ~l~af~ quadrangle M~-8.85a
Projection is UTM Zorn 17 NAD83 Daturn G=1.3?7

P1Ay-26-2006 FR 110 ; 33 RM DENR RRU h HX NU, 1 y l y9 t t 4 ~ 1 tS r, u4
O
~.
,~ ..
;:
..,
i
~ u ~~
s ~~~ ~~

MRY-26-2006 FRI 10;36 AM DENR RRO FAK NU. lylyb~lq~1~ r, u~
Parcel Number: 17D4396579
Map created on 4/21lY006 11:07:44 AM.
Copyright 20D3. Clry of Raleigh, Wake County.

REIb: 0121080
OWNERI: RALEIGH CITY OF
ADDR1: PO BOX S90
ADDR2: RALEIGH NC
27602.0590
ADDRS:
GEED 800K: 02989
OEEp PAGE: 03!!9
DEED DATE: t7l1l1991
DEED ACRES: 12.6
6LbG VAL: 441159
V1ND VAL: 5575880
BILLING CLASS: EXEMPT
DESCRIPTION: METHOOIS7
ORPHANGEIAND
MAP NAME: 170414
PIN NUM: 1704336579
PIN EXT: 000
CITY: RAL
PLAN JURIS: RA
TOWNSHIP: RALEIGH
YEAR GUILT: 1996
SAL6PRICE: 0
SALEOATLr:
TYPE USE: Olney
DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
UNITS: 1
LANG CLASS: EXEMPT
OLD PARCEL 523.00000.0038
NUMBER:
AAL6IGH StfE AOORESSBS 1
STREET NUM: 801
STREET SUITE:
STREET OIR PRE:
STREET NAME: WASHINGTON
STREET TYPE: ST
STREET DIR SUF:
ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel
0 ae~ 20 N AODRESS STATUS
CODE DESCR: ACTIVE
~l-+b~
wa 2i.e~..na~ac~ry:~n.~n
ti AY K.E ~. ~ ! ~ ~~~~~'Yt~'
l UlWl\

7ENPORARILY REIACATE BLEACHERS -
REMOVE CONCRETE BASKETBALL
COURT AND COALS
,r .
,rte ~~
~~ ~ ~-
REMOVE IXISTING G1TCH BASIN
ANO RETNN COYER I
flENOVE 25 LF SIDEWALK
AND CURB AND CUTTER I
ABWDON IXIS7ING SS MH i
SEE NDTE 2 ,
REMONE 20 if SIDEWALK I
(IF REQUIRED) FOR PATH
CONSTRUCiWN.
awr x wet
1
v-nu
NI d14N
REMOVE IXISIING HEADWALL
TO EJ(1ENi REQUIRED ~
flEMOVE IXISTMG CONC FLUME -~
REMOVE IXISRNC FOOTBRIOCE -
- REMOVE 24 lF 48' OIA PCP
-REMOVE IXIS7INC HEADWALL
REMOVE 40 LF OF IXISTINC
DD' RCP. ABANDON
REMNNDER IN PUCE WITH
FLOWAOLE FlLL PER
SPECIFICATIONS
REMOVE IXISIINC HEADWALL
AND PAD
p r smy nt
r wr ruw
REMOVE 25 lF SIDEWALK
AND CURB AND GUf1ER
NOTE:
COMOURS IN iH5 AREA
OBTNNEO FRON C6 DAiI
AND ME NOT SURYEYEO~
CONTRACTOR STOCKPILE/UY
DOWN MD1, SEE NOTE 5
o5-t a~,svz
4
N
2~~ !0
REMDNE RIPRAP, BRIDGE, \ ~ P" '~ ~ i yq ya u`u yy i lEGEMD
AND GEOTF)(TIIE ~ ~ ~ I
I I --15p0---- IXISRNG INOIX CONTOUR
~- I
9 _______
~4 ~M~, rew ue,oc I ______ ' ' IXISRNC INTER UNffSTE CONTOUR
""~ --1 mmmmrmmwn.m
~~ a I--T'-"-""~ --- TREEUNE
,~N fir.. ` I I ~------r----~------~---- --------- CONSIRDGTq
r~ I I I I~~g I ~~ VMfl~ I
\_ 0 / ~ ~r ~ VI u~puuw I ~nri I ~ Iwwa WCa e{!u I m~uu of ny r. ell I NOTES:
y+ ~ OI MIt P. 111 AAyRM yYt tNl. Iy
V ~ I µ~ ~y rM~A I I~° u;,y I. ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS AND MATEflIAIS FROM
Y \~ ®~~ / I Imi u u ~ec I ~ ~ u ~ I 11p1 N A` ~'y I I CLEARING ANO GRUBBING ACTMIIES INCLUgNG
_ \ I I I I ABANDONED DEBPoS, YARD WASTE, ETC SHALL BE
• ~O '~'~ ~' ~° g I I I I I I REMOVED FROM SRE AND gSPOSED AT
~ CONTRACTORS IXPENSE
~ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND CLEAR, TRUNK GRIND
R•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ MATERUL RN ACCORDANCE WRTH SPECIFIGTgNSpIOUS
~ ~
~ ~ ®~ 4 ® REPAVE IXISRNC 3 YECLTA~IONRAT ID RECTION OF CRYE PMROTECTION
_ _ ~ ~ r ~~~~"'- ,~~ ~' • ~ °' PAVEMENT (24' K 5'f) AND/OR ENGINEER
I RII RAP ID FES __ -- I ---~~ 4. CONTOURS LOCATED IN CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA
I I i I ' i ~ I I iL , + I VEREFY ACTUALIGRONDMAEIFlATIONNTRACTOR TO
I I I I I I I a b2 ~ S. CONTRACTOR SNALL STOCKPILE AND REINSTALL, IF
I I I i I I III nLUS MAfa! at. Jere qWN UNK FENgNCLLCONDIT10N AND ACCEPTANCE
I I I I ---__J $ . PRIOR TO RE-I~AllATiON DDAMACED NtEASESNALL
~ I I i I I
I I 2 r p gSCRETA)N. AND REPLACED AT OWNER'S
I Ohm gr. J.B. BUCNIEY PROIFxf N0. 8879-5007
~~ ~ J C~ CITY OF RALEIGH FnE ~E; c_I
Cnlpo..~6lkJfy NORTH CAROLINA EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND BHEET ND.
~"~ `y`b Br.y. B~NCHFK SAaoal.l~a~.,sl`SOO FRED J. FLETCHER PARK EXTENDED
NWWI, xnn ra.rn17
CR055 °"`'° "' T.Ln,~l,e7~o DEMOLITION PLAN C-1
Ire,, ~*°~° ~' ,~,..~I,yI,~N.,~l,.,~,1, DETENTION WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PLAN
N0. ~~ ORWN CXKO REWRIfS GATE: NOJNBtlt 10°7 ~
100% SUBM ITTAL -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

..
.~
w ... ~ a
.~
..
A 1EMPORARY ROIECT REDBIRD
M CONSTRUC110N SCULPTURE W/ TREE
gn. - ENTRMCE PROTECTION FENCEING
o"" WASHINGTON ST. A TEMPdiNO'
~ DRAINAGE SYSTEM _ CONSTRUCTION
~ ENTW9ICE
.._. r,
L~ ~f~~
_ ,~
~. ,~ ~~
>P~

Qww Aw ~
?w
1~
°~
Gµ
B+~
UMR TREE CLFNiINC IN
THIS MU TO E%iEM
REQUIRED TO INSTALL PIPE
ATHLETIC
DRAWAi
SEGMENTA BLOCK ~ ~ .I~ ~ / ..- r ... `"
RETAINING WALL rw,~ 1 cw ,, ~ ~W / \ ~61~j~
I, ~ ~ ~ lFw
PROPOSm 8 R °~yy'~F ;;~~'~~~,
ASPHALT PATH ~ ~" (3' y';j~ ._ ~ (~
{~ -- STOCKPILE/
~K . :, tfi~R I IAYWWN-
„~ ~~i i MEA f
~~'_ ~ ! ~ L
~ I
. ~~` ~ ~~ ~
F ~ i
- ~' .•,• ~,~1/1~ ...-" li~, , WERAND DUREE

/^
r
wEnwa '~""ji ,
=~~ \~{r. ~ P~ NO~N1
Bw STOCKPILE HAUL
ROAD, SEE NOTE 2 " _~/~P"-^
- PHASE 2'APFi1 / `k U
-
~,M
bw /. 1 .
/ , / ~,w,~ S
w~ ~°".° A TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
r~__~~.~_~~ r // r ~ / _
/ _ -
.BECMEMAI 61.OCK FNTRANCE
d„
I CONTRACTOR _
S
h
L ~ RETAADNG wAu
NOTE: STOCKPILE MU /
/
UMRS OF STOCKPILE M~ /
..
Bti~i
0'w~ SHAL BE AS SH~ OR 9~
~~w 10' OfF FOOTBALL FlELD TREE PROTECTION MU / f"""
~ / r
ti,°w"~ ~ 0v II - / ~ (- /, GEOCEII
~"' ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ j PRROTECTON ~ ACCESS PATH
TREE oww 9pw ~ / ~ 0 ~
~' 1 DE HAUL PROTECTK)N ~ ~ ~ 30 FT MADE PATH CROSSING
RDAD CORRIDOR "~ n >/ f ~, ~~ PdNi, SEE NOTE 3
~ ~j ~ i .
IXISfING 6' WIDE ASPHAT PATH `I / ` ~ ~ , ~
M"'SHALL 9["REPgytEp OR REDUCED ~ ~ ~ / _ f A ' ~
AT ENGINEERS' DESCRE110N Mw jpp ,,,,, ~ Mw TREE PROTECTNN AREA
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
~`"DONS~ ONE ~/ ~. ~ ~~ ~/-L • 6+w
P EAeRCTION~ -' .s ~'~"_, L -.»
15' PATH CROSSING , I ~ \ ~ I
0~Pdt$niEE NOTE 3
~ UPPER PMK
~w
-Ow ~ ~~ ~ DRNNAGE MU
N~ ~ ^ -ls~ / ~ Y ~~~ I TREE PROlEC110N MU
j
f h
N-,., ,
o5-~aa,~ ,ra
4
N
2~ ~0
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
PHASE 1.
1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRATICES AT WASHINGTON STREET AND CLENW000
AVENUE. DEFlNE STOCKPILE MFRS AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.
2. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING W/IN PHASE 1 AS SHOWN.
3. INSTALL TEMPORMY EROSK)N CONTROL DEVICES AT PHASE 1 ARU MD
PERFORM LINKED CLFAPoNC 6 OEMOLffN)N IN PHASE I AREA DEMO
BASKETBALL COURTS, MO REMOVE MD STOCKPILE FOR flASNETBAL GOALS MD
BLEACHERS FOR REUSE.
4. INSTALL 48' RCP MD E%TENDED DETENTION WETLAND OUTLET STRUCTURE.
INSTAL LONG-TERM EROSION CONTROL DEVICE AT OUTLET. BACKFILL PHASE 1
MU TO ALLOW FLOW BY GRAVITY TO THE OUTLET AT ELEVATION 282.0.
PHASE 2.
5. INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSN)N COMROL DEWCES IN PHASE 2 MFRS MD
PERFORM LINKED CLEMINC MD DEMOLIHON IN PHASE 2 MFA
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROCEED TO CONSTRUCT UPPER AREA
7. WHILE WORKING UPPER AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL SPOIL ALL CUT MATERWL MD
IMPORT ANY FILL.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY STOCKPEE MATERIALS TO BE USED DURING PHASE 2.
9. PERFORM EARTHWORK IN WETLAND ARU i0 SUBGMDE EIEVAT10NS, INSTALL
DRAINAGE PIPING TO WETAND FRdd WASHINGTON STREET MD ATHLETIC FIELDS,
10. PLUGGING 30' RCP FROM WASHINGTON STREET MD REMOVING WEIR.
CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENTS, MAMENMCE ACCESS ROADS, MD RETMNINC WALLS
MD DNERT RUNOFF AS REQUIRED IN fOREBAY MD WETLAND TO iACIUTATE
EMTHWORK EFFORTS.
11. PERFORM CHMNEL STABIUUTION GRADING ANO INSTAUTION UPSTRUN OF
FOAEl41Y.
12. INSTALL PPING MID STRUCTURES IN UPPER PMK NUS.
13. INSTALL TOPSOA MD PIANRNGS IN FOREBAY MD NETLMID NUS. PERFORM
PERMMEM SITE STABIUUTION MD RESTORATION.
Qtld5L3.
14. REMOVE 30' PLUG AT WASHINGTON STREET MO INSTAL DNERSION WEIR.
15. REMOVE LONG-TERN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AT OUTLET MD CLOSE BOTTOM
DRNN.
NHS,
1, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SPECIA CME TO REMOVE TREES MD SHRUBS ON
E%6TING EMBMKMENT AT CLENWOOD AVENUE. CLEMING SHALL BE
ACCOMPLISHED USING HAND TOdS. (LE. NO VEHICLES SHAL ACCESS THE
SLOPES MD SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONSOU7gN WITH THE CITY'S URBM
FORESTER. TREES MD SHRUBS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH TO GRADE MD SLUMPS
TRUTEO WIM MPROVED HERBICIDE ANY xOLES SHALL BE BACKFIIIED WITH
SOIL MATCHING THE CONSISTENCY OF THE SURROUNDING GROUND.
2. CONTRACTOR SHAL CONSTRUCT MD MNNTAIN HAUL ROAD DURING
CONSTRUCTION. MU MAY BE GRADED, HOWEVER, MU MUST BE RES10RE0 TO
EXISTING GRADE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT EARTH MOVING OPERATIONS TO 70 FT WIDE PATH
CROSSING POIM TO EXTEM PRACTICABLE.
lEGEN0
®- - IXISTINC INDIX CONTOUR
IXISIINC INIERNEDMTE COMOUR
TREELIKE
UMffS OF CONSTRUCTION
.----------- UMffS OF TREE PROTEC110N
OEBIONm Ri• J8 BUCKLEY ~ PROTECT N0. 8879-5007
J. NILUNOSNURM
°RAMN ~' CITY OF RALEIGH FILE NWe c-2

' CmppYwANtl4~ NORTH CAROLINA
SITE DEVELOPMENT
SHEET No

o ar: u. elrNOr~c
sH¢r aK
cRass cxN•o 9r:
aw9el.womA.w,Dmsao
"""~"~"°"'~`'""'°"
rrt lelelmbem

FRED J. FLETCHER PARK EXTENDED .

REV
"°"°~° ~'~
I
~H
.
.~.
DETENTION WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PLAN C-2
. DALE DRWN CXKD REIAVMB 01iE: NOVEI~ER ]007 «~.
,
re
N0.
100°~ SUBMITTAL -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

1( I
• ~~
..,. ~, ~,, gIa14~ .
P;}'I~r
~,. ~
ASPHALT PAVENENi - ~
REPNR - ~ ~
~
NR ~
~~'~ ~/
_
SIDEWALK REP ~
N
~„°~" 1wLLr .
y
our, ~
80' % 10' X 4' CONCRETE
I
BASKETBALL COURT W/ CONS ~ I
(INSTAll AS DIRECTED BY OWNER) ~ ~ Y` ~ ~, _ f n
MH 2 & 3 NCCOT STD
DWG 810.51 W/BASE
RSER ONLY
CREST EL=285.0
NY. IN. EL=281.0
6' INV. EL. OlR•282.0

iAWLE
~.ym, ~H_K'JRW r
e RV1NFl11~ `..' .
~'POPUA ~IIPLEI~
'•"'gCPOPUR \
70ALAR
~...
\% I ~ I \'/ I \/ I
~
~... ,
... 6'%B' PR gpN,AC~~DBOX
H COVER
f 30 D~
~
4' 1 C I/~
~~ ~ 1 a a J Y 4
4L
.T4
RIV,OUi•28
/ TOP EL. • 294.5.(FIELD VERR'Qt .. '
IIAr IN/WL'i2' RCP (L 291.13 ' . ~

(YIELD VEWFY) ..
~~/~~ -
'
:
,
.
i 4
~~Y ~1
I ~' ~ r "~ N
' .. r~~{~vAaIJ! ~ ~ H`
A
~
T P
~ .' I

~
-
SP
IW
.
AT A
I I
~}'xaur A DRNEWAY ANO

%
(~'XdLY ~IIOLLY
- SgEWNJC U
. / . ~ 1' = ZO'
Y 1. ~ Apr
ids- -20

3
~
~ ~ '\
\ ~
~MpLr
LL~~1,,..,,,,,,,,,,~~ C-S
q'AIAOEARMII"`r ~ _ C~AAI,:
REDBIRD SCULPTURE
/ )
`
- "'
- .
N4IES
CURB INLETS
AND
DROP INLETS
NCTION BO%E5
I
A
/ ~ ~ ~ ,
,
.
,
LL JU
MANHOLE DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS PACE ARE MINIMUM
1 /
T DIMENSIONS, AND SHALL COYERN OVER THOSE INCLUDED ON
C-S
F
'
~ I NCOOT STD DWGS.
----- - SEE PIANIING PLW L
~
,~: ~, FOR VEGETATNE ZONES
'
'
~. I
Z' HIGH - 200
SEGMENTAL B
~
flETNN G
~~ I
fv;"

(' O'SPAU!£ CE
~"~~ M" 7~'~AA ~
I
• 'MMIE
pq~g~~~~~
•
y
.~~ "'
"
l. MH-4
NCDOT STD DWC B/0.52
TOP EL. 193.1 (FLUSH WITH CRAOE)
~7
~_~ , y~ Vl ".u"
cc!!
L
10: • ~' Vl ^"'"tlt" ~ ~ .
_i
~ ~ OUT EL12B 1BI
72 LF 18 INCH RCP
L COLLAPSI
CONSTRUCTION TEMPORARY CRAVA /
STAGING AREA ACCESS ROAD /
_ _ _ ~ / / / r'J':.
// ~~. ~:
7'
,;.,,...
~/`
," (~' cO~AyyK,
'J. BIROI
":a "
,~~
~ ~` ' paG,NE ~~~ /
•~; t~~•Y ~ , - ~ ® IXIS-NG INDIX COMOUR
~'";•`• .~ ~"'"- p'11p9ERRY\, C~ ~ _ IXISIING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
~/ ~, ~' TREFLNE
/. ~~ ~4.~~. \ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- PROPOSED INDIX CONTWR
/i. ' ~ ~ 176 ,~` ~ PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
~' '. M.Pop~ I \~ /" ~ ~ GEOCELLUTAR ACCESS PATH
~'4A;LE ~... " ~ \~ ~ ' " ~;.... , ... ~'s : ASPFVLT PATH
"/. ~ \ .
DLSYxkD Br J.B. BIICI(LEr ~
CITY OF RALEIGH PROJECT NO. 667B.i00]
C-3
A KILUNCSwoRIN FIIF NAME:
oww~r ~, OmAp~e4Nw NORTH CAROLINA EXTENDED DETENTION WETLAND seLEr xa
ACET LNKD BT: Y. BRINtl1EK AIODf~moJAwu0.Aib9W

CRDSS CNK'D B!:

TN:IB1~iL1aeA
~~'~~~'= FRED J. FLETCHER PARK EXTENDED
GRADING PLAN
C
3
APED A4: DETENTION WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PLAN -
~,, O/TE DAWN CXKO AE4MN5 p
AH; NOYE4BEA M07 ~.,„,,,..~,.,,;,~.m.,~,,,.,P..v.
N0. , 100% SUBMITTAL -NOT FOR C NSTRUCTION

n rr n n ~
.
~ os-lads V~

n
~ ~
~~ ~ .:

r
~ ~~
- I~I~
,

+~, CONSTRUCTION STAGNC MFA i
I ? ~ /` ".* r v

,
1 TEMPORARY GRAVEL L / ~i z~ ~~ ` E I'
('
ACCESS ROID ;, y ~~~ i ,
" /'' I
N
,
~4 ~7/ ~
x }~ L z // (~
,
~ MM
~
i4

/ , IJ
I \ _
y5
~i' ~
+.
~
,~ / '
'
~/
/
~ ~ / ~ .20
1
~
J
.
F~
, ,~ '/
~
/ I~0
C5 I i
.
i ~ q /

b / `' NOTES:
I CJ 8 TI /
~//
-
.~(~ ~
S ~'tl~~~~G~
It `~\
\ 1J 0.L JUNCTION BO%ES, DROP INLETS, CURB INLE15, AND
MANHOLE DIMENSONS AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE ARE MINIMUM
' 'x4' P /
,
1
/
C
`
r~l s AND SHALL GOVERN OVER THOSE INp.UDED NCDOT
DIMENSIONS
" J OP - / .~
M
wJ I ~
p ~
+ ~
~ ~ ,
STD DWCS.
~ ~ ,
y, ,
(~ /
/ / I
~ \
s
OU 295;1)
(~ 120 ~
~
. ~ /~
/
NN
~ T~ '
~ I~ -
[~
283.6 A
/. ~
` ' r'r
/C~ n ~ N
y
~
~, 2.) ALL PIPES SMALL BE TYPE III RCP WITH REFERENCE i0 NCDOT
STD DWG 300.01 TOR BEDONC REQUIREMENTS.
^
`
\ /
~
/ \ /
~
J'
/
~ / p
~ \
.
~

~: // ` /
CRADE SWALE ID
/
M
OIE: ;

r;
~
y •~/
~ ~
\
~
I
~
S ~/
`~~
/ 7 IINV.~" N~D•>!O

~ { / /
1 ~
'° ~
~t \ ~ / 4 IN 2 f
~5 IN 2 ~W `/ / /
/ / ~ ~~.~F R~1

i \ ~'
/ a ,./r~~ 1
/
ili~'~ / /
50,1
/

` t ~ h Y / I
t

\ 5 ~, ,MEET dISTING CAACE
~ M / I

~'f
1
~' ` '';
^ /

~

I
.
~
1
;
~ we 315
I
I
~
; /
„ r
/
,; `
~;: ~~~ ~
~ i
`~ I

~ ~
j ~
k~IM
~ ~, -~
'
Ili"
~ 7 ~
I 1
~S~ X
~
6 FOOT WIDE BffUMIN0U5 CONCRETE WALK
JI4
T .1711XppM~,~X~ ~
T .22IkNPW) ~TEI ~\
p '.BOX JI!
316 T~ IB
IA I %
CRUSHED STONE SWAIE
IN 13 I
~ ~ I .314 lI,.3
x Si ______

1 X PRECAST MASONRY PIER (2)

1
I S ~

~ „ ~.
311 1Q5 ~ ~ I I
,~ _~
S13
!11
i~~,~ 't I X ALCESSIBIE CURB RAMP

2
\ SU
' ~2 i
~
\ 712
~- ~
.!
~ ~ _
/ B
_
_ CURB AND GUTTER
~
i
` / ~ 2 a-1
/ ( NOWT STD DWG 810.02 (BO%)
I ~ ~

! ~,~ ~ ~ ..- ~

- ,... I ' I NCOOx3'-2' (0) PRECAST( RAM% CRATE AND HOW)
TOP EL. -FIELD VERIFY
• 1...; CRATE EL = 323.75
L
w ` ~
..1 15'NV. WT-717.0
l Ertun
' ADJUST IXISIINC SSMH TOP

PROTECT TREE AS SPECIFlED. AS REOUIRFD TO MATCH GRADE
JOW IXISIING INDIX COMOUR

' W NOT ALLOW ANY TRAFFIC OR
'. STWKPILINC Of MATERIALS
IXISTINC IMERMEOUTE CONRIUR
'..
. WRHN FENCED AREA.
,. •, .. TRFIIINE

' AFT % 10R RIPRAP SPLASH PAD S.
~JOQ'- PROPOSED INDIX CONTOUR
.

~ J9-1
NCDOT STD DWG 810.31 ., ,. t.

~ -
PROPOSED INIERMEDWTE CONTOUR
', 4'%1' (ID) PRECAST 80X _ - - - - - LAAffS W CONSTRUCTION
' W/MH C04ER
: TOP EL - 320.5
NV IN 0..-315.60
INV OUT EL. - 712
ALL GRAINS SHALL 86
FIELD LOGTED AND
CONNECTED TO JUNCTN)N
BOXES.
OESGNO) BY: J.A. BUCKLE/ ~
CITY OF RALEIGH PROTECT ND. 6679-3007
ow~x ~ J. IaINC6xoRIx FILE NAMe c-,

SHEET CIND N.N~ BPoNDNTX ~o~6N~
'~3`>I~,~'A,~-„'6~`~3 NORTH CAROLINA UPPER FIE LD 1 BOYLAN AVE PIPE SYSTEM :MEET rb.

cAOSS cxl'o Br:
rail jeiq ~ Tlnz FRED J. FLETCHER PARK EXTENDED

GR
D ~~ DETENTION WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PLAN ADING PLAN C-4
R~,
N0. ~~ DAMN CHKO AEMMMS pQE: NOVc18EA 1007 ~.A„,..~,.,,,re.,,.,, ,„,,,
IVU70 JVDIVIII I/iL-IVVI FVR VVIYJIRVVIIVIV