NC0087556_Permit Issuance_20020308

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 8, 2002
Mr. Tony Riels
Schnyder/Riels Development, Inc.
410 Mills Gap Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28738
Subject•. Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO087556
Schnyder/Riels Development WW'IP
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Riels:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for the subject permit. Accordingly, we are
forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon.written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Michael Myers at telephone number (919)
733-5083, extension 508.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A Goodrich
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Asheville Regional Office/Water Quality Section
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
Central Files
NPDES File
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 -TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 1 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET@ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.US/NPDES

Permit NCO087556
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Schnyder/Riels Development, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Schnyder/Riels Development WW'TP
Miller Road (NCSR 2800)
Fairview
Buncombe County
to receiving waters designated as Cane Creek in the French Broad River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV
hereof.
This permit shall become effective April 1, 2002.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on December 31, 2005.
Signed this day March 8, 2002.
priginal Signed BY
David A. Goodrich
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit N00087556
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Schnyder and Riels Development, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. After receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division, construct and operate a
0.027 MGD wastewater treatment system. This facility will be located at the Schnyder and
Riels Development off NCSR 2800 near Fairview in Buncombe County.
2. Discharge wastewater from said facility at the location specified on the attached map into
Cane Creek, classified C-Trout waters in the French Broad River Basin.

Sj
i
i
i
Flo
CD
y✓ dcue
_ K�Q q�.M Ghm/A=r/Rialc rlavalnnmant \MA/TP
iBw#ioss 2000.shp
Fb -st
/ Tsb shp
ULrdy Bounday
0 M nicipat boundary
HQW/ORW watersheds
N
A
Cane Creek Hydrography
NCO087556
Buncombe County
0.5 0 0.5 1 Mies
a
Information
State Gnd: E 9 SE
USGS Quad: Oteen
Subbasin: 04-03-02

Permit NCO087556
A. (L) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge treated domestic wastewater from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Limits
Monitoring Requirements
J-
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measuremen
t Frequency
Sample Type
Sample Location
Flow
0.027 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 200C
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Residue
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
NH3-N
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
200/ 100ml
400/ 100 ml
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 µg/L
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
pH'
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. The pH'of the effluent shall not be less than 6.0 nor greater than 9.0 (on the standard units scale).
Definitions:
MGD — Million gallons per day mg/L — Milligram per liter
ml — Milliliter µg/L — Micrograms per liter
BOD — Biochemical Oxygen Demand

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
SS.
NORTH CAROLINA
PUBUC NOTICE
On the basis of thorough
staff review and applica-
tion of NC General Statute
143.21, Public law 92 M
and other lawful Stan-
lards, and regulations, the
North Carolina Environ•
ImentaCommlission Proposes to
Issue a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) waste-
water discharge permit to
' the persons) listed below
ive 4S days from the
ixalsh date of this notice.
Written comments regard-
Ing the proposed permit
Will be accepted until 30
days after the publish date
of this notice. All com-
ments received prior to.
that date are considered in .
the final determinations
regarciiirtg the plr000sed
perm•1t. I Director at
the NC Division of Wafer
Quality mrn+ decide to hold
a public meeting for the
• prap0�.,ed permit should
' the Division receive a
sig-
i, degree of public
Interest
Copies of the draft permit
and other supporting In-
formation an file used to
determine conditions Pre-
sent in the draft permit are
available upon request
and payment of the costs
of reproduction. Mail
comments arxt/or requests
for information to the NC
Division of Water Quality
at the above address or
(attached) in any com-
munication Interested
D1vi on oaf Walso atervi( ualitty
at 512 N. Salisbury Street.
Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 be-
tween the hours of 8:00 am
and 5:00 prn to review In-
formation an file.
NPDES Permit Number
NC0087556. Schnyder and
Riels Development, Inc.,
410 Mills Gap Road,
Fletcher, NC 28738 has ap-
plied for a new permit for
a facility boated In Bun•
'oornbe County discharging
treated wastewater Into
Cane Creek In the French
Broad River Basin. Cur-
rently No parameters are
water quality limited. This
discharge may affect fu-
ture allocations In this par
tion of the receiving
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared Janis Pierce, who, being first duly sworn,
deposes and says: that she is the Legal Billing
Clerk of The Asheville Citizen -Times, engaged in
publication of a newspaper known as The Asheville
Citizen -Times, published, issued, and entered as
second class mail in the City of Asheville, in said
County and State; that she is authorized to make
this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or
other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
attached hereto, was published in The Asheville
Citizen -Times on the following date: February 2,
2002. And that the said newspaper in which said
notice, paper, document or legal advertisement were
published were, at the time of each and every
publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of
the General Statues of North Carolina and was a
qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section
1-597 of the General Statues of North Carolina.
Signed this 18th day of February, 2002
(Signature of 4rsonmaking affidavit)
Sworn to and subscribed before me the 18th day of
February, 2002
My Cbmmission exbires the 17th day of August,
2003
February 2, 2142
(4095)
t _.

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: NPDES UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION: Mike Myers
DATE: October 29, 2001
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
NPDES PERMIT NO. NC0087556
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Schneider & Riels Development, Inc
Mailing: 410 Mills Gap Road
Fletcher, N.C. 28738
2. Date of Investigation: October 17, 2001
n�YT
3. Report Prepared By: Max L. Haner / ARO
G
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: "I Z
5. Directions to Site: Proposed site is located adjacent to Miller Road
( NCSR 2800) with the southern most boundary approximately 0.24 Mile
from its intersection with NC Hwy 74 near Fairview, N.C., Buncombe
County. The site encompasses both sides of Miller Road and abuts
Cane Creek on the East.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 31- 32.36" Longitude: 820 24' 12"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. E9SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Oteen, N.C.
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
X Yes No If No, explain:
-1-

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): WWTP Site not in
flood plain
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approx. 335 ft (House not in line of
sight from proposed wwtp site)
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Cane Creek
a. Classification: "C-Trout"
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: French Broad / 040302
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Wildlife, Agriculture
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted 0.027 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? N/A
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current
design capacity N/A
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years:
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: The proposed facility will be a 27,000 gpd dual
train, extended aeration type system with flow equalization,
aerated sludge holding, chlorination and dechlorination and
standby power. The discharge will be to Cane Creek, Class "C-
Trout" in the French Broad River Basin.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Dechlorination to be
provided.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed
-2-

2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit
Number
Residuals Contractor
Telephone Number
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP OTHER
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Waste solids will
be transported to the City of Brevard wwtp for final handling
and disposal in accordance with contracts issued to Harry
James, James & James Environmental, ORC from Mike Lust of
Mike's Septic Tank Service, and the City of Brevard WWTP.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
4. SIC Codes(s): 4952
Primary 04 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code:06007
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or
are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
None
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate)
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
-3-

In
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of
the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective
for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: Not costed due to insufficient available land.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Not cost effective due to
distance from site.
Subsurface: Not cost effective due to topography constraints.
Other disposal options: Private sewer system - not available
S. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Review of the alternatives analysis shows that the proposed NPDES permit
and wastewater treatment facility which will serve this proposed
residential development is the most cost effective, environmentally sound
treatment alternative. The proposed wwtp location is in accordance with
siting criteria found in 15 NCAC 2H.0200 and the receiving stream, Cane
Creek, appears to be suitably sized to accept this discharge.
As result of this review, ARO recommends that the permit go to public
notice and be issued baring any substantive adverb comment
Signat/are of Report Preparer
W ter Quality Regional Supervisor
/ v
Dat
-4-

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM D
To be filed only by dischargers of 100% domestic wastewater (<1 MGD flow)
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
North Carolina NPDES Permit Number I NC00
(if known)
Please print or type
1. Mailing address of applicant/permittee:
Facility Name
Owner Name
Street Address
City
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Schnyder/Riels Development WWTF
Schnyder and Riels Development, Inc.
410 Mills Gap Road -
Fletcher !, ;,
h s
North Carolina
28738 APR 2 7 2001
( 828) 687-0699
1 0Ao f oor-loov I UM - W.ATF1 01JALITY
e-mail Address PORN Sou.
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Name (If different from above)
Facility Contact Person Tony Riels
Street Address or State Road Miller Road (NC SR 2800)
City / Zip Code Fairview 28730
County Buncombe
Telephone Number ( ) Same as above
3. Reason for application:
Expansion/Modification *
Existing Unpermitted Discharge
Renewal New Facility
* Please provide a description of the expansion/modification:
4. Description of the existing treatment facilities (list all installed components with
capacities):
No existing treatment facilities on site.
X
S. Description of wastewater (check all that apply):
Page 1 of 2 Version 6199

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM D
To be filed only by dischargers of 100% domestic wastewater (< 1 MGD flow)
5. Description of wastewater (check all, that apply):
Type of Facility Generating Wastewater
Industrial
Commercial
Residential
School
Other
x
Number of Employees
Number of Employees
Number of Homes
Number of Students/Staff
75
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (example: subdivision, mobile home park, etc.):
Residential subdivision of single family three -bedroom homes
6. Number of separate wastewater discharge pipes (wastewater outfalls):
One (1)
7. If the facility has multiple discharge outfalls, record the source(s) of wastewater for each
outfall:
Not Applicable
8. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall):
Cane Creek
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
�
Tony Riels � i � ,� G C-r'P_S �• �� `�
Printed Name of Person Signing
_ 0W
r•
Title
of Applicant
_1� q(40 �
Date Signed
North Caro ii Ja General Statute 143-215.6(b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or
certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, hampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any
recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental
Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or
imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both for a similar offense.)
Page 2 of 2 Version &99

Local Government Review Requirements
for the Issuance of New Non -Municipal Domestic Wastewater Discharge Permits
General Statute Overview
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the issuance of NPDES Permits for non -
municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental Management Commission (ELNIC) may not act
on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facilir' until it has received a written statement from
each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the proposed facility and its
appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a zoning or subdivision
ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is consistent with the ordinance. The
E\IC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or count has determined to be inconsistent with zoning
or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide significance and is in the best
interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant
Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant shall request that both the
nearby city and county government complete this form.
The applicant must: -
♦ Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the
city and the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
♦ If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the
certified mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the
application'to the NPDES Unit.
♦ As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall
submit a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to
respond within the 15-day period. _
Instructions to the Local Government
The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the
proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this form to the applicant
within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government .1 /Y m6, 411 &kN
(City/County)
Does the city/count), havy jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances
are to be located? Yes [�J No [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes V No [
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordi ance in effect, is the plan for the proposed fac' .ty consistent with the
ordinance? Yes [ ] No [ J i * "Q
Date %�+� Signature
(City ager unty Manager)
State of I Ydr-17 1 aY1 h" aZ �, County of rCJt-� 1i co't &o
r-
On this 0( rid day- of (/0�/ � 0�; personally appeared before me, the said
name � KkiV-1 to me known and known to me to be the person
described in and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she)
executed the same and being duly- sworn by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document
are true.
My Commission expires c� -7 -0C0c i .(Signature of Notary Public)
tot. • Publi Eicial Seal)

DAVID D. SMITH and COMPANY
Civil Engineering Consultants
46 Haywood Street., Suite 201-A
Asheville, NC 28801
June 15, 2001
Mr. Charles Weaver
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
re: Schnyder/Riels Development
NPDES Permit Application
Buncombe County
DDS Project No. I33201-525-04
Dear Mr. Weaver:
I"',ft �
Enclosed please find the executed NPDES permit application and supporting documents for the Schnyder/Riels
Development. Desires of the owner, Schnyder and Riels Development, Inc., include a residential development
consisting of 75 one-third acre lots for single family homes.
We are providing the following Engineering Alternatives Analysis to aid in your review of the application for the
Schnyder/Riels Development in Buncombe County, North Carolina.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A.
B.
Ize`t��
I`
a5ff,
Facility Name: Schnyder/Riels Development
County:
Buncombe
Owner:
Schnyder and Riels Development, Inc.
Contact:
Tony Riels
Mailing Address:
410 Mills Gap Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28738
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Report By:
Amy F. Cook, P.E.
David D. Smith and Company
Civil Engineering Consultants
46 Haywood Street, Suite 201-A
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
Project and Property Description: The subject project is located on Miller Road (NC SR 2800)
in Buncombe County southeast of the City of Asheville. Desires of the owner include a residential
development consisting of 75 one-third acre In% for single family home% with a wastewater
treatment facility and surface water discharge to Cane Creek. A map indicating property and
approximate discharge locations has been included for your information. P,.r
e.t is A r„s 1, j/kaw
The subject property is approximately mere®. Stuart B. Black's Onsite Wastewater Soil/Site
Evaluation Report accurately describes physical properties of the site. "The property is roughly in
the shape of a rectangle that lays slightly northwest to southeast (almost due north to south) with a
large, thin notch missing from the southern end of the western edge. In addition there is a four and
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15,2001
Page 2 of 9
a half acre square protruding from the southeastern comer." Cane Creek forms the eastern edge of
the rectangle.
"There are two knolls on the property. One is near the center of the southern third of the property.
The other is just 150 feet or so south of the center of the northern property line. Two ridges
radiate out from the southern knoll. One goes nearly due north to about the northern third of the
land before ending abruptly in a nose slope. The other ridge goes nearly due west a couple of
hundred feet or so and then angles northwest off the property near the northern end of the missing
notch. Two ridges also radiate from the northern knoll. One goes slightly northwest (almost due
north) off the property. The other one goes almost due east (perpendicular to Miller Road) before
ending abruptly just west of (above) Miller Road.
"There is a series of valleys on the property. The largest one begins just west of the southern knoll
and flows generally northwest. It exits the property near the northern third of the eastern property
line. Most of the other valleys flow eastward (more or less) into the large valley.
"There is a large creek (Cane Creek) just east and parallel to Miller Road. There is a steep bank
(50% slope +/-) along the entire eastern edge of the property (except where the valley exits). This
steep bank, that is shallow to rock/rocky soils, is likely an old creek bluff. It was probably created
as the creek eroded its way down through the landscape and left the more resistant material.
"Both, the end of the ridge in the northeastern corner and the hillside in the southwestern comer,
exhibit complex topography or gullies at close intervals. There are other areas that show this
condition to a lesser degree.
"Some old logging or farm roads cross the property. The more prominent two are along the
southern two-thirds of the eastern edge and in the northwestern corner parallel to the western
property line.
"The vegetation on the property is largely"scrub" pines and white pines about 15 years bld-or so:
This is consistent with old grown up fields. There are no known wells, stream, or structures on the
property." ✓ 20av*
Wastewater Generation: At the regulation design flow of 360 gallons per day fGPD) per hone
for a three -bedroom home; the total daily flow is 27,000 GPD=
C. Existing Facilities: No treatment facilities exist on the subject property.
D. Phased Construction: Construction of the residential development as well as the proposed
wastewater treatment facility will be single phase.
II. EVALUATION OF DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
A. Connection to Existing Public Sewerage System: No municipality owned sewer collection
system currently serves the subject property. According to the Metropolitan Sewerage District of
Buncombe County (MSD), the subject property is outside their boundary and the nearest
collection line is located approximately &Tmiiesfrom the property At present, the MSD has no
plans to extend the collection system. The North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) will not allow a non -municipality owned sewer collection system to be constructed
within and parallel to the NCDOT right-of-way. Connection to the existing collection system will
require the following:
• Construction of a minimum of four (4) wastewater pumping stations capable of overcoming
an elevation difference of approximately 400 feet.
• Installation of an estimated 2,300 LF of gravity sewer and 17,250 LF of force main.
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 3 of 9
• Petition to Buncombe County to accept ownership of the sewer collection system because
MSD will not accept ownership of the sewer collection systems outside the District
boundaries. Based on our experience, it is our opinion is that Buncombe County will not
accept ownership of such an extensive sewer collection system. However, if the County
would accept ownership, the collection system must be adequately designed to collect and
transport all potential flows along its route. For evaluation purposes, costs associated with
the sewer collection system are based on facilities sized to transport wastewater from the
Schnyder/Riels Development only.
Operation and maintenance procedures anticipated are as follows:
• A certified operator will maintain the pump stations. His/her duties will include weekly
inspection of each pump station as well as annual inspection of the Schnyder/Riels on -site
collection system, the 8-inch gravity sewers and the force mains. Pipeline inspection costs
are included with the pump station maintenance. _
• Life expectancy of each pump is 10 years. _
• Life expectancy of the pipes is 50 years.
Cost Analysis:
Capital Cost:
Schnyder/Riels Development On -Site Collection System
Construction
$146,460
Engineering
$10,800
Surveying
$8,250
Schnyder/Riels Pump Station
Construction
$168,200
Engineering
$32,400
Surveying
$14,520
Pump Station A
Construction
$214,620
Engineering
$42,800
Surveying
$20,870
Pump Station B
Construction
$171,000
Engineering
$32,400
Surveying
$14,780
Pump Station C
Construction
$85,200
Engineering
$24,600
Surveying
$2,750
Gravity Sewer
Construction $140,400
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 4 of 9
Engineering $14,000
Surveying $6,330
MSD Depletion Fee $56,250
Total Project Capital Cost $1,206,630
Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost:
Schnyder/Riels Pump Station
Operator $2,600
Utilities $3,600
Pump Station A
Operator - $2,600
Utilities $5,150
Pump Station B
Operator $2,600
Utilities $5,950
Pump Station C
Operator $2,600
Utilities $840
MSD Annual Treatment Rate $36,460
Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost $62,400
Pump Replacement Cost (replace pumps a year 10 and 20):
Schnyder/Riels Pump Station $6,000
Pump Station A $7,200
Pump Station B $7,200
Pump Station C $4,000
Total Pump Replacement Cost (2001 dollars) $249400
Present Value Cost Analysis
Present Value Cost of Project $1,762,280
B. Connection to Existing Private Sewerage Systems:
1. Communications Instruments, Inc. (NPDES # NC0033227)
Communications Instruments, Inc. (CII) has been contacted by the Developer to request that
their facility accept and treat the expected wastewater to be generated by the subject
development. This request has been denied by CII.
2. Fairview Elementary School (NPDES # NC0066788)
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 5 of 9
The Buncombe County School system has been contacted by the Engineer's office to request
that their facility accept the expected wastewater to be generated by the subject development.
This request has been denied.
In addition, as previously stated, the NCDOT will not allow private sewer lines to be placed
parallel to and within their right-of-way. Based upon our experience, obtaining necessary
easement from individual property owners in order to transport waste from the development
site to the wastewater treatment facility will be difficult.
3. Flesher's Fairview Rest Home (NPDES # NC0034924)
Flesher's Fairview Rest Home is unable to accept additional wastewater flows from any waste
generator other than their facility. Their current treatment system has failed and construction
has begun for a new "package type" treatment facility. However, design of the facilityis to ,
' accommodate.a 20-year growth of the rest home.. Due to site/topography limitations and
existing utility locations, additional treatment capacity cannot be added.
C. Land Based Disposal:
1. Subsurface Disposal System:
a. Conventional Subsurface Treatment/Disposal System:
Soil scientist, Stuart B. Black, has investigated the site and performed soil sampling
related to the feasibility of utilizing on -site subsurface wastewater systems for this
project. Mr. Black's report (attached) concludes that "septic systems are not practical to
serve the wastewater needs of this proposed development." He also suggests that "a more
practical approach would be to pursue a discharge permit through the N.C. Division of
Water Quality or seek municipal sewer."
We have however, evaluated a subsurface disposal ' system utilizing a conventional
subsurface system on the suitable portion of the property. Because additional property is
not available for purchase, all subsurface alternatives must be placed within the
Schnyder/Riels Development property boundaries.
The approximate property size is 26.7 acres. Based on the "Soil/Site Evaluation Report",
it is our opinion that one-half of the property is unsuitable for a conventional subsurface
treatment and disposal system. Our assumptions for this evaluation are as follows:
• 13.35 acres will be divided into 1/3 -acre lots having individual septic tanks on the lot
and nitrification lines located in the "suitable" portion of the property.
• Approximately 13/a-acres of land will be dedicated to roadways and their associated
rights -of -way (3/:-acre per "suitable" and "unsuitable" areas).
• 13.35 acres of "suitable" portion of property will include a single area for the
location of nitrification lines which will serve the lots located on the "unsuitable"
portion of the property.
• Due to site topography and the amount of wooded areas in the "suitable" area, it is
our opinion that the minimum lot size will be 3/4-acre in order to accommodate
individual conventional subsurface systems.
• The sewage collection system for the lots located on the "unsuitable" property will
include a minimum of two pump stations, force main and a series of gravity sewer
lines.
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 6 of 9
Based on our evaluation, the "Soil/Site Evaluation Report", visual inspection of the
property, the average slope of the property in the range of 25 — 30% and being heavily
wooded, it is our opinion that additional area will be required to accommodate the
nitrification trenches. Approximately 11/z to 2 times the amount of area will be necessary
to compensate for the slopes, soils and required setbacks. Thus, an estimated 9.1 acres
(including repair area) of "suitable" area will be needed for location of the nitrification
trenches to serve the lots on the "unsuitable" portion of the property.
The remaining portion of the property suitable for lots with individual conventional
subsurface systems is 3.5 acres and allows for the placement of four 3/4-acre lots.
Operating procedures anticipated for this type of wastewater treatment and disposal
system include:
• A certified operator will operate and maintain the pump stations, dosing tank,
siphons and manifolds. "
•0 Power requirements per pump station are assumed to be 50,000 kWh per year.
• Life expectancy of each pump is 10 years.
• Life expectancy of the pipes is 50 years.
• Life expectancy of the nitrification trenches is 20 years.
• Septic tanks will be pumped every three years.
Cost Analysis
Capital Cost:
Construction $420000
Engineering $90,000
Surveying $43,430
Total Project Capital Cost $553,430
Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost:
Operator $7,600
Utilities $4,840
Septic Tank Pumping $2,750
Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost $15,190
Pump Replacement Cost (replace pumps at year 10 and 20):
On -Site Pump Stations $8,000
(4 pumps)
Total Pump Replacement Cost (2001 dollars) $8,000
Present Value Cost:
Present Value Cost of Project $690,750
Lost revenue due to 34 less lots @ $20,000.00/lot = $680,000.00
b. Low -Pressure Pipe System:
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June15,2001
Page 7 of 9
According to the Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems low-
pressure pipe nitrification fields may not be installed on slopes greater than 10% without
approved special design procedures to insure proper distribution of effluent over the
nitrification field. According to the "Soil/Site Evaluation" only one area on the property
exhibited a slope of less than 10%. This profile k3, slope of 8% however, is unsuitable
for the installation of a low-pressure pipe system because of the soil texture.
Therefore, based on the soil and site criteria of the Laws and Rules for Sewage Treatment
and Disposal Systems, the Schnyder/Riels Development Property will not support a low-
pressure pipe system and further evaluation is unnecessary.
2. Surface Disposal Systems:
Spray Irrigation: The estimated land area requirement for spray irrigation is 2.3 acres with
an additional 0.3 to 0.5 acre necessary for 30 days storage capacity. Based on the property
topography, wooded areas, required 400 feet setbacks and type of desired development, we
are of the opinion that Iand area available is insufficient and impractical to acc6mmod6te a
spray irrigation system.
Drip Irrigation: The estimated land area requirement for a drip irrigation system ranges
between 4.6 and 14.5 acres with an additional 0.3 to 0.5 acre necessary for 30 days storage
capacity. Based on the property topography, wooded areas, required 400 feet setbacks and
type of desired development, we are of the opinion that land area available is insufficient and
impractical to accommodate a drip irrigation system.
Mound System: Information regarding mound systems taken from Metcalf & Eddy, Water
Resources and Environmental Engineering, 1991 indicate that "Mound systems have been
used where... (3) slopes are less than 12%, ... Many regulatory agencies no longer approve the
use of community -sized mound systems because of the high rate of failure..."
The NCDENR refers to Mound Systems as Fill Systems in the Laws and Rules for Sewage
Treatment and Disposal Systems. 'These systems can be installed only on sites with uniform
slopes less than 15%. As evidenced by the "Soil/Site Evaluation" approximately one -fifth of
the property exhibits slopes which are less than 15%. Also, systems with greater than 480
gpd of wastewater flow must utilize low-pressure pipe distribution. As previously stated, the
Schnyder/Riels Development property will not support the installation of low-pressure pipe
distribution.
Thus, further evaluation of a mound system is unnecessary.
D. Surface Water Discharge:
1. Stream Flow Information: The Asheville Regional office of the NCDENR, Division of
Water Quality was consulted to obtain stream flow information for the proposed discharge's
receiving stream, Cane Creek. Information provided for Cane Creek in the area of the
proposed project indicates that the summer 7Q10 is 6 cfs and the winter 7Q10 is 8 cfs.
The USGS was also consulted for stream flow information and is as follows: 7010 is 5.6 cfs
and 3002 is 8.8 cfs*
2. Description of Proposed Facilities: It is proposed to construct a 27,000 GPD dual -train
aeratlelY'pe6 ai a -type wasviWater treatMent'faNilitty, consisting of the following
treatment components:
9,500 gallons flow equalization tank with dual alternating pumps and controls.
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 8 of 9
27,000 gallons of aeration with diffusers, blowers, motors and controls.
Dual 3,000 gallon clarifiers, with a total of 172 ft'- of surface area.
Airlift biosolids return pumps and airlift skimmer pumps, aerated biosolids holding
tank, 9,000 gallon capacity with supernatant biosolids holding tank integral with the
treatment facility.
1,000 gallons, total, chlorine contact tank to provide the minimum 30 minute
retention time.
750 gallons dechlorination and post -aeration tankage.
6" discharge piping to Cane Creek.
Standby power to be provided.
On -site sewer collection system as described in the evaluation of connection to the
MSD sewage system.
No additional easements will be required for discharge to Cane Creek.
3. Cost: Following is a cost estimate of the proposed discharge system:
Capital Cost:
Construction $373,250
Engineering $24,000
Surveying $11,500
Total Project Capital Cost $408,750
� f
Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost: "~
Operator S6,000
Monitoring $3,000
Utilities $4,500
Residuals Management S1,000
Chemicals S1,000
Maintenance $3,000
Annual Fees $715
Total Project Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost $19,215
Present Value Cost:
Present Value Cost of Project $572,340
4. Addition of Tertiary Filters: The addition of tertiary filters to the proposed wastewater
treatment facility will increase the capital cost of the project by approximately $20,000. Thus,
increasing the present value to $592, 340.
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

_.
Mr. Charles Weaver
June 15, 2001
Page 9 of 9
III. SUMMARY
Capital Cost.
Annual O&M Cost
Present Value Cost
Connection to MSD System
$1,206,630
$62,400
$1,762, 280
Connection to Private System
N/A
NIA
N/A
Conventional Subsurface System
$553,430
$15,190
$690,750
Low -Pressure Pipe System
N/A
N/A
N/A
Spray and Drip Irrigation
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mound System
NIA
N/A
N/A
Surface Water Discharge _
$408,750
$19,215
$572,340
Surface Water Discharge with Filters
$428,750
$19,215
$592,340
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on our analysis of alternative treatment and disposal options, it is our opinion that construction and
operation of a 27,000GPD extended aeration wastewater treatment facility with discharge to Cane Creek is
the only viable option. It is requested that you consider the above information included as supplementary
evidence to the NPDES Permit application.
We trust this information adequately addresses the requirements of the NPDES Permit Application. Due to the time
constraints placed on Schnyder/Riels Development, Inc. by the property seller, we will most certainly appreciate a
timely review. Please do not hesitate to contact our office should you need clarification or additional information.
Very truly yours,
DAVID D. SMITH AND COMPANY
111i't.0,
1
il PDX
1411,11,
Amy F. Cook, P.E.
AFC:
Enclosures:
NPDES Permit Application
$715.00 annual fee
Location Map
Local Government Review Form
On -Site Wastewater Soil/Site Evaluation Report
Supporting Calculations with maps and diagrams
cc: Tony Riels w/enclosures
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

MODEL INPUTS FOR LEVEL B ANALYSIS
r
GENERAL INFORMATION g 9, 3. 0. S, w3 S
Facility Name:
3cGa;d✓ -R,
CS
Fa:ea.•= E
NPDESNo:
nW�o-to
n1C00a
Jcoo G 8
Type of Waste:
�Ps;
onoesnL
~1
Facility Status:
Fx. s r,
. s<
Receiving Stream:
(y e C
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
p .o -oz
oN-o3-oz
oar-o3-oz
County:
(,a
13�.-
RegionalOffice:
AIZO
AReo
�o
TopoQuad:
orEEN
C9 -recllorBC�
FLOW INFORMATION
USGS#
Date of Flow Estimates:.
,o !
/3*7- /
Zoo I
Drainage Area (mi2):
1g. 3
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
G,
G 3
S.61
g l
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
7 %
�7, 7.1
7 j
o
Average Flow (cfs):
a3. O
a3. !
Z3. 3
a 3. 8
30Q2 (cfs):
g
�5
$ .9 r
9. o
IWC at Point of Discharge (%):
o. 71
p, as
— (
2. SS"
Cummulative IWC M:
MODEL INPUT INFORMATION
LENGTH OF REACH (miles)
0. oy 17
U. o<19
o - & G
o . y Z
INCREMENTAL LENGTH (miles)
b . o o s
o. oo S—
o . oS
o . o s-
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
FLOW (MGD)
o. oa 9
o , o l,7S
O, 0//
CBOD (mg/1)
y 7
S
</5'
NBOD(mg/1)
0
90
o
D.O. (mg/1)
RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs/mil)
0.31
G. 3
QA(cfs/mil)
/,Q Bl
. z8
7.4
/. 3
CBOD (mg/1)
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TRIBUTARY CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs)
0,01
QA (cfs)
0. o
CBOD (mg/1)
o
NBOD (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
SLOPE (fpm)
3t
9
3
Name of facility

PROJECT PROJ. NO. SHEET OF
5I )zZ �� C e(•Se�� r2R Fu "r ie, CcwO CRetK�
00C
I
U/(O 4� ut 10
LLT- io n LR Ltr-�o- L F• .Y✓; as f�e;,.).,ti. ?
I:Ai Yo
S� 12G = �71m•- i�'T � Ce�..z � jts � wo$ s'l, Gtea�,
Fie✓,Sec
S123 � . uTr C(ry��,-k. 4�, FAT
rr
�i {2H - (•l�r VRu ✓�'.:'....GIF-w.c•��4. �n _. �hu:c �Y�n �-G�.
'�, �S l5�lwc�i'� °C-Qseel� �, f- e6l�ers ja,-r✓.Y,�,
7Qee �ya d.SL r)
6S 7n�i
CS,nWNn'l,'Z.�..
�rhn._d..- 1Z,Y1a aw
�0.- (J.. g6 G <iVe
O� o o3q,hF0
/
V. •^IDS"n'laa
Nio - 0-0 o{'s S.Gcti
w+7C.0 �7. JefY:
=VFC6\
�3
�2 Fr
9,
1
a o. a
-
Irf
X, S Ra
r.
Fp ..r14'tw. lril V'tW
G2: u.oilMr�o
�iskw�,i CRa k s,�
s 0vv .vlzr
51
-so Z _ ).ocfs
y
S�1
3N 0 = LI-4 3. 0cFS
r
e� s�
24>lu 3, � c c3
c��, X4
c

PROJECT PROD. NO. SHEET OF
Jrl�e,�I�r 12e.. pi
cLio' e'l n,o SQ /tee, r5
A/1-V�<_0111
2 9OZ qZ2 0'
zt,' �. 2 9 Z 993&
C,; = 0. Z f10�1,T% �L_ a3 _ o.z/ 0a/5/ f+
A2CA Z
1` y
al" >
0. //o 57S9 G�
ay o. 4 3 3 92 9' F< L
uz
d�rcdrl,_
Aze,
o , 0 f1977
Prz ,
qL - o, //0 99j 9
P�
c{3 9.210759
P_
ay O,ZG /6-�a
h-
a= �.sGgc�7 Ffz
SC,& j ri-,� _�-a l:
�l/ono Z-
L o0o //42 X /O �
��jj
l' ,pb5,ed
3
= o,oa�l wl�D

PROJECT PROJ. NO.
SHEE1 OF
ti(e00
-50 caz
-'w c. = 0. 7 / %
,1- / i 9 / w /- /) iIXt m ✓»• Lwi, o.R,o 1.�3P2c�txc-�-.75
QA
Q-.
w 2alo
scc"
4Clef>
w ck)z
MAP kt, �lac0OR8
a�o�v Z a�� 1
�u�;,� �,w = /,S3</S1z`i � t7�a.�C r4yr�w - /. �!a(000�5 h� � J•
`C/D,ZZr.��`
we. w_ v,rfal! £�?,- gP110=u_o E'yPa„r 74iv -o.c
_i�13 = C7.``�.So�SOIrJ cnz Z
AAA--"A-
0 % V.Ia M
crp--r %Q/O : 0.0
Fr Z. U a,,-, 0- T A& w/ a, &-"//i7 Vv- oil p�'N, //`/-(
cla�.r.�}p uOyC,
Q = ..2 $Q K�'i l7 w. Z&OO /m = . 0544 x(c p ` /,
r �'"" � C✓Sc r�e STrdAb Vc%G /,.0' S-, . /S7yl.
Rli

SUMMER
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
:
FLESHER'S
FAIRVIEW REST HOME
Receiving Stream :
CANE CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O.
is 8.41
mg/l.
The End CBOD
is 2.27
mg/l.
The End NBOD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is 1.85
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach # (mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment 1
------
7.66
---------
0.00
-------
.1
Reach 1
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.02700
Reach 2
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.04700
Reach 3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach 4
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.01100
Reach 5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach 6
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.03500

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger
:
FLESHER'S FAIRVIEW
REST
HOME
Subbasin :
040302
Receiving Stream
:
CANE CREEK
Stream
Class:
C-TR
Summer 7Q10
:
5.6
Winter
7Q10
7.7
Design Temperature:
23.0
LENGTH
SLOPE
VELOCITY
DEPTH
Kd
Kd
Ka
Ka
KN
------------
mile
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ft/mi
fps I
ft
design I
@200
I design
@200
design
Segment 1
0.05
39.00
0.439
0.93
0.51
0.44
32.86
30.79
0.63
Reach 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
0.05
39.00
0.443
0.93
0.51
0.45
33.21
31.11
0.63
Reach 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
0.17
13.30
0.329
1.09
0.32
0.28
8.40
7.86
0.38
Reach 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
0.42
13.30
0.331
1.10
0.32
0.28
8.47
7.93
0.38
Reach 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
1.28
13.30
0.495
1.39
0.34
0.30
9.13
8.55
0.38
Reach 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment 1
1 0.90
30.30
0.637 1
1.25
1 0.49 1
0.43
126.77 1
25.08
0.63
Reach 6
t
Flow
CBOD
NBOD
D.O.
cfs
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
0.042
45.000
90.000
0.000
Headwaters
5.600
2.000
1.000
7.720
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.310
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
0.073
45.000
90.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.310
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
0.090
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.310
2.000
1.000
7.720

Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste
0.017
45.000
90.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.320
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 5
Waste
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Tributary
8.100
2.000
1.000
7.720
* Runoff
0.430
2.000
1.000
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 6
Waste
0.054
45.000
90.000
0.000
Tributary
0.000
2.000
1.000
0.000
* Runoff
0.310
2.000
1.000
0.000
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

SUMMER
Seg #
Reach ##
Seg Mi
D.O.
CBOD
NBOD
Flow
1
1
0.00
7.66
2.32
1.66
5.64
1
1
0.01
7.68
2.32
1.66
5.64
1
1
0.01
7.70
2.32
1.66
5.64
1
1
0.01
7.72
2.32
1.66
5.65
1
1
0.02
7.74
2.32
1.66
5.65
1
1
0.03
7.75
2.31
1.66
5.65
1
1
0.03
7.77
2.31
1.65
5.65
1
1
0.04
7.79
2.31
1.65
5.65
1
1
0.04
7.80
2.31
1.65
5.65
1
1
0.04
7.82
2.31
1.65
5.66
1
2
0.04
7.72
2.85
2.78
5.73
1
2
0.05
7.74
2.85
2.77
5.73
1
2
0.05
7.76
2.85
2.77
5.73
1
2
0.06
7.77
2.85
2.77
5.73
1
2
0.06
7.79
2.85
2.77
5.73
1
2
0.07
7.80
2.85
2.77
5.74
1
2
0.07
7.82
2.85
2.77
5.74
1
2
0.08
7.83
2.84
2.76
5.74
1
2
0.08
7.85
2.84
2:76
5.74
1
2
0.09
7.86
2.84
2.76
5.74
1
3
0.07
7.86
2.83
2.73
5.83
1
3
0.12
7.90
2.82
2.72
5.85
1
3
0.17
7.93
2.81
2.71
5.86
1
3
0.22
7.96
2.80
2.69
5.88
1
4
0.20
7.94
2.92
2.94
5.90
1
4
0.25
7.97
2.91
2.93
5.91
1
4
0.30
8.00
2.90
2.91
5.93
1
4
0.35
8.02
2.89
2.90
5.94
1
4
0.40
8.04
2.88
2.88
5.96
1
4
0.45
8.07
2.86
2.87
5.98
1
4
0.50
8.09
2.85
2.85
5.99
1
4
0.55
8.10
2.84
2.84
6.01
1
4
0.60
8.12
2.83
2.82
6.02
1
5
0.60
7.89
2.35
1.78
14.12
1
5
0.62
7.90
2.35
1.78
14.13
1
5
0.64
7.91
2.35
1.77
14.14
1
5
0.66
7.93
2.35
1.77
14.15
1
5
0.68
7.94
2.35
1.77
14.16
1
5
0.70
7.95
2.34
1.77
14.17
1
5
0.72
7.96
2.34
1.76
14.18
1
5
0.74
7.97
2.34
1.76
14.18
1
5
0.76
7.98
2.34
1.76
14.19
1
5
0.78
7.99
2.34
1.76
14.20
1
5
0.80
8.00
2.33
1.76
14.21
1
5
0.82
8.01
2.33
1.75
14.22
1
5
0.84
8.02
2.33
1.75
14.23
1
5
0.86
8.02
2.33
1.75
14.24
1
5
0.88
8.03
2.32
1.75
14.24
1
5
0.90
8.04
2.32
1.75
14.25
1
5
0.92
8.05
2.32
1.74
14.26
1
5
0.94
8.06
2.32
1.74
14.27
1
5
0.96
8.07
2.32
1.74
14.28
1
5
0.98
8.07
2.31
1.74
14.29
1
5
1.00
8.08
2.31
1.74
14.30
1
5
1.02
8.09
2.31
1.73
14.30
1
5
1.04
8.10
2.31
1.73
14.31

1' 5
1.06
8.10
2.31
1.73
14.32
1 5
1.08
8.11
2.30
1.73
14.33
1 5
1.10
8.12
2.30
1.73
14.34
1 5
1.12
8.12
2.30
1.72
14.35
1 5
1.14
8.13
2.30
1.72
14.36
1 5
1.16
8.14
2.29
1.72
14.36
1 5
1.18
8.14
2.29
1.72
14.37
1 5
1.20
8.15
2.29
1.71
14.38
1 5
1.22
8.15
2.29
1.71
14.39
l 5
1.24
8.16
2.29
1.71
14.40
l 5
1.26
8.17
2.28
1.71
14.41
1 5
1.28
8.17
2.28
1.71
14.42
1 5
1.30
8.18
2.28
1.70
14.43
1 5
1.32
8.18
2.28
1.70
14.43
1 5
1.34
8.19
2.28
1.70
14.44
1 5
1.36
8.19
2.27
1.70
14.45
1 5
1.38
8.20
2.27
1.70
14.46
1 5
1.40
8.20
2.27
1.69
14.47
1 5
1.42
8.21
2.27
1.69
14.48
1 5
1.44
8.21
2.27
1.69
14.49
1 5
1.46
8.22
2.26
1.69
14.49
1 5
1.48
8.22
2.26
1.69
14.50
1 5
1.50
8.22
2.26
1.68
14.51
1 5
1.52
8.23
2.26
1.68
14.52
1 5
1.54
8.23
2.26
1.68
14.53
1 5
1.56
8.24
2.25
1.68
14.54
1 5
1.58
8.24
2.25
1.68
14.55
1 5
1.60
8.24
2.25
1.68
14.55
1 5
1.62
8.25
2.25
1.67
14.56
1 5
1.64
8.25
2.25
1.67
14.57
1 5
1.66
8.26
2.24
1.67
14.58
1 5.
1.68
8.26
2.24
1.67
14.59
1 5
1.70
8.26
2.24
1.67
14.60
1 5
1.72
8.27
2.24
1.66
14.61
1 5
1.74
8.27
2.23
1.66
14.61
1 5
1.76
8.27
2.23
1.66
14.62
1 5
1.78
8.28
2.23
1.66
14.63
1 5
1.80
8.28
2.23
1.66
14.64
1 5
1.82
8.28
2.23
1.65
14.65
1 5
1.84
8.28
2.22
1.65
14.66
1 5
1.86
8.29
2.22
1.65
14.67
1 5
1.88
8.29
2.22
1.65
14.67
1 6
1.88
8.26
2.38
1.97
14.73
1 6
1.93
8.28
2.37
1.97
14.74
1 6
1.98
8.30
2.37
1.96
14.76
1 6
2.03
8.31
2.36
1.95
14.78
1 6
2.08
8.33
2.35
1.95
14.79
1 6
2.13
8.34
2.35
1.94
14.81
1 6
2.18
8.35
2.34
1.93
14.82
1 6
2.23
8.36
2.34
1.93
14.84
1 6
2.28
8.37
2.33
1.92
14.85
l 6
2.33
8.37
2.33
1.91
14.87
l 6
2.38
8.38
2.32
1.90
14.88
1 6
2.43
8.39
2.31
1.90
14.90
1 6
2.48
8.39
2.31
1.89
14.91
1 6
2.53
8.40
2.30
1.88
14.93
1 6
2.58
8.40
2.30
1.88
14.95
1 6
2.63
8.40
2.29
1.87
14.96
l 6
2.68
8.41
2.29
1.87
14.98
1 6
2.73
8.41
2.28
1.86
14.99

S
1 6 2.78 8.41 2.27 1.85 15.01
I,8eg # I Reach # I Seg Mi D.O. CBOD NBOD I Flow