Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW3240304_Soils/Geotechnical Report_20240820 U1tC'(tC'�C Intertek- PSI 5021-A W. WT Harris Blvd. Charlotte, North Carolina 28269 Phone: (704) 598-2234 Fax: (704) 598-2236 August 18, 2023 Waffle House, Inc. 5986 Financial Drive Norcross, Georgia 30071 Attn: Mr. Erik Haeffs email: erikhaeffs(D-wafflehouse.com Re: Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Waffle House Restaurant 7421 NC-73 Denver, North Carolina PSI Report No.: 05111114 Dear Mr. Haeffs: Professional Service Industries (PSI), an Intertek Company, is pleased to transmit our Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the proposed Waffle House Restaurant to be located at 7421 NC-73 in Denver, North Carolina. This report includes the results of field and laboratory testing, and recommendations for foundation and pavement design, as well as general site development. PSI appreciates the opportunity to perform this Geotechnical Study and looks forward to continued participation during the design and construction phases of this project. If you have any questions pertaining to this report, or if PSI may be of further service, please contact our office at 704-598-2234. PSI also has great interest in providing materials testing and inspection services during the construction of this project. If you will advise us of the appropriate time to discuss these engineering services, we will be pleased to meet with you at your convenience. Very truly yours, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND 1 SEALED BY: ,.\ cnR ''%� �r U Lloyd T Digitally signed by -�.� (N....._O(� .,� �. ESSj Lloyd T Lasher O.of 9 Lasher Date:2023.08.18 _ _�a SEAL 11:45:25-06'00' = 53158 Bryan L. Gordon, II Lloyd T. Lasher, Jr., P.E. : <'•.Froo,,,E�•',e;� Technician II - Construction Senior Geotechnical Engineer North Carolina License #53158 ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED. THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES www.intertek.com/building '^ V 1 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC PSI Report No.05111114 tonAugust 18, 2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROPOSAL AND PROJECT AUTHORIZATION ............................................ 1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................. 2 2 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES............................................................................2 2.1 FIELD SERVICES........................................................................................... 2 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING ............................................................................... 3 3 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ..............................................................3 3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION....................................................................................... 3 3.2 SITE GEOLOGY ............................................................................................. 4 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 4 4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................6 4.1 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................. 6 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK..................................................... 7 4.3 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................... 10 4.4 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 11 4.5 FLOOR SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 12 4.6 PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PARAMETERS........................... 13 5 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS................................................................ 15 5.1 GROUNDWATER ......................................................................................... 15 5.2 EXCAVATION AND SAFETY........................................................................ 15 6 REPORT LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX Site Vicinity Map Boring Location Plan General Notes and Soil Classification Chart Boring Logs Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 1 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 PROPOSAL AND PROJECT AUTHORIZATION This report presents the findings and recommendations of a geotechnical exploration and assessment performed by Professional Service Industries (PSI) for the proposed Waffle House Restaurant to be located at 7421 NC-73 in Denver, North Carolina. These services were performed in general accordance with PSI Proposal No. 0511-395291 dated March 15, 2023. Authorization to proceed was given to PSI on June 20, 2023. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project information was provided through an emailed request for quote (RFQ) from Erik Haeffs of Waffle House, Inc. on March 3, 2023. The RFQ included a boring location, presented as "Soil Tests Locations."An ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey by Professional Land Surveyors dated June 19, 2023 and a Site Plan by labelled Sheet CO2.1 by Contineo Group dated July 3, 2023 were also provided. Based on the provided information, we understand that the development will include construction of a single-story building with a concrete slab-on-grade floor to be located in the southwestern corner of the site. The building will have a footprint of approximately 2,600 square feet (20' by 90'). Based on structural loads from the, "Soils Report Criteria and Site Evaluation Authorization" document provided by Erik Haeffs; maximum anticipated column and wall loads will be on the order of 9 kips and 1.8 kips per foot, respectively. Proposed pavement areas are also proposed to the north and west of the proposed building. Traffic loading information was not provided at the time of this report. However, we anticipate that traffic loads will be produced primarily by automobile traffic, occasional delivery and trash removal trucks, and rare fully loaded semi-tractor trailers. The provided "Soils Report Criteria and Site Evaluation Authorization" document indicates a finished floor elevation (FFE) of 780 feet. No finished floor elevation or proposed grading information was included with the provided site plan. The ground surface across most of the site generally has a downward slope from north to south. Based on a review of Google Earth, the provided ALTA Survey and our site reconnaissance, the ground surface elevations across the site range from about 762 feet to 778 feet and about 767 to 771 feet in the proposed building area. Therefore, fill depths of about 5 to 10 feet are estimated for the proposed building. Proposed grades for the remainder of the site were not provided but fills on the order of 10 feet and cuts of up to 2 feet are anticipated based on current site grades and the proposed FFE. The need or location of any proposed retaining structures or slopes required to facilitate the proposed grade changes were not provided. The information presented in this section was used in the evaluation. Estimated loads and corresponding foundation sizes have a direct effect on the recommendations, including the type of foundation, the allowable soil bearing capacity, and the estimated potential settlement. In addition, estimated subgrade elevations and cut/fill quantities can have a direct effect on the provided recommendations. If any of the noted information is incorrect or has changed, please inform PSI so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report, if appropriate. If PSI is not retained to perform this function, PSI cannot be responsible for the impact of the changes on the performance of the project. Page 1 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this study was to obtain information regarding the general subsurface conditions within the proposed construction area, to assess the engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials, and to provide general design recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of the proposed construction. To accomplish this, PSI performed a site reconnaissance, drilled six soil test borings within the areas of proposed site improvements, conducted laboratory classification testing and prepared this report summarizing the findings, as well as our conclusions and recommendations. The scope of our geotechnical services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock, groundwater, or air, on or below or around this site. Any statement in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions are strictly for the information of our client. PSI did not provide nor was it requested to provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same. Client acknowledges that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Client further acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI's control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification. 2 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES 2.1 FIELD SERVICES PSI advanced eight soil test borings (Borings B-1 through B-8) within the proposed site. Not all borings provided from the "Soil Test Locations" matched up with the "Soils Report Criteria and Site Evaluation Authorization." Borings B-2 and B-4 were drilled to represent the proposed building footprint, borings B-5 through B-8 represent the proposed pavement areas, B-1 represents the location for the sign and B-3 represents the location for the detention pond. The approximate boring locations are shown on the "Boring Location Plan" (Figure 2) included in the Appendix. Horizontal and vertical survey control was not performed for the test boring locations prior to our field exploration program. The borings were located based upon estimated distances and relationships to obvious landmarks, and the site plan provided by the client. The boring locations are considered accurate to the degree implied by these methods. The soil test boring was advanced at this site by HPC Drilling, a subcontractor hired by PSI, utilizing a CME-55-X truck-mounted drilling rig using hollow-stem, continuous-flight augers. All boring and sampling operations were conducted in general compliance with ASTM D 1586. At regular intervals, soil samples were obtained with a standard 2-inch O.D. split-barrel sampler. An automatic trip drop hammer was used for the standard penetration testing, which generally has a higher efficiency than a manual cathead-and-rope hammer. Typically, the automatic hammer yields lower standard penetration test resistances (N-values) than a manual cathead- Page 2 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 and-rope hammer. This reduction has been taken into account in our evaluation. However, the N-values reported on the logs, and the consistency descriptions on the boring logs are based on the field-recorded values and were not corrected for hammer efficiency. The recovered soil samples were classified visually in the field by the drill crew and/or a PSI representative, then transported to our laboratory for additional visual classification and laboratory testing. A"Boring Log" was prepared for each boring and the "Logs" are included in the Appendix of the report. The logs were prepared using the observations made in the field, as well as the classifications in the laboratory and the laboratory test results. Strata descriptions, presented on the logs, were based on visual-manual evaluations by our geologist and include the classifications in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS). The"Soil Classification Chart", included in the Appendix, illustrates the USCS legend depicted on the logs. The ground surface elevations at each boring ground surface were interpolated from the provided topographic information and should be considered approximate. Groundwater levels were measured in the boreholes during drilling and upon completion. The results of the measurements are presented in Section 3.3.3 and included on the soil test boring logs when encountered. The borings were backfilled after removal of augers using the soil cuttings or bentonite chips for safety considerations. Therefore, delayed groundwater level readings are not available. Prior to backfilling the cave in depth was recorded. 2.2 LABORATORY TESTING A geologist visually-manually classified the soil samples in the laboratory in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM D2487 and D2488). Percent finer than the No. 200 sieve (ASTM D1140), Atterberg limits tests (ASTM D4318), and natural water content determinations (ASTM D2216) were conducted on representative samples recovered from the test boring locations. The laboratory test results are presented in Section 3.3.4 and/or are shown on the individual boring logs. 3 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The site encompasses an area of approximately 1 acre and is located southwest of the intersection of NC-73 and Brentwood Road in Denver, North Carolina. The site location is depicted on the "Site Vicinity Map" (Figure 1) included in the Appendix. At the time of our site reconnaissance, majority of the site was forested. Rip rap site drainage was observed in the southern end of the site (NC-73 side) along with sewer and utility lines parallel to NC-73. Additional rip rap was discovered scattered around the perimeter of the forested areas on site. The southern portion of the site was grass-covered with patches of overgrown vegetation. The ground surface across most of the site generally has a downward slope to the south. Based on site topographic information provided, relief across the site is approximately 20 feet with about half of that relief occurring in the southernmost portion of the site along NC Highway-73. Page 3 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 PSI performed a review of historical aerial photographs of the site available on Google Earth. Based on this, the site generally appears in its current condition from prior to 1993 until the construction of Brentwood Rd which appeared to happen in 2017. 3.2 SITE GEOLOGY The project site is located within Lincoln County, North Carolina, and lies within the Charlotte and Milton Belts of the Piedmont Physiographic Province of the eastern United States. This province is characterized by broad, gently rolling ridges formed on the stronger bedrock of the area. Between these ridges, lowlands and drainage areas are formed on the less resistant bedrock. The Piedmont is a complex assemblage of igneous (volcanic and plutonic) and sedimentary rocks that were generally formed during the Late Proterozoic Era and the Early Cambrian Period (approximately 550 to 900 million years ago). During and subsequent to formation, these rocks were subjected to several major tectonic events, including plate collisions,folding,faulting, and igneous intrusions,that resulted in the uplift and metamorphism of the preexisting rocks. The tectonic activity generally stopped about 200 to 250 million years ago and erosional forces have formed the current ground surface. Review of the Geologic Map of the Charlotte 1° by 2° Quadrangle, North Carolina and South Carolina (USGS, by Goldsmith, Milton and Horton, 1988)indicates the site is underlain by meta quartz diorite of late Proterozoic to early Cambrian age. Residual soils are the result of in-place physical and chemical weathering of the parent bedrock. In the Charlotte and Milton Belts residual soils generally consist of clays, silts and sands corresponding to the composition of the parent bedrock. Separating the residual soil from the underlying parent bedrock is typically a transition zone of high consistency material referred to as partially weathered rock. Partially weathered rock is defined as residual material with standard penetration resistance (ASTM D1586) in excess of 50 blows per 6-inches penetration. The weathering processes that produced the residual soils and partially weathered rock were extremely variable, due to such factors as rock type and mineralogy, past groundwater conditions, and the tectonic history of the specific area (resulting in localized fractures, joints and faults within the bedrock). Differential weathering of the parent bedrock has resulted in highly variable subsurface conditions and can include abrupt changes in soil type and consistency over relatively short horizontal and vertical distances. Furthermore, depths to rock can also be highly variable; and suspended boulders, discontinuous rock layers/lenses, or rock pinnacles can be present within the residual soils and transitional zones of soft weathered rock. 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS General subsurface conditions encountered during the subsurface exploration are described below. For more detailed soil descriptions and stratifications at the boring locations, the "Boring Logs" should be reviewed. The "Boring Logs" represent our interpretation of the subsurface conditions based on a review of the field logs and an engineering examination of the samples. The horizontal stratification lines designating the interface between various strata represent approximate boundaries. Transition between different strata in the field may be gradual in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Groundwater, or lack thereof, encountered in the borings and noted on the "Boring Logs" represents conditions only at the time of the exploration. Page 4 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18, 2023 3.3.1 SURFACE Topsoil ranged from approximately 5 to 8 inches thick across all the borings. However, deeper pockets of topsoil may be present in other areas of the site. The term topsoil, as used in this report, is a general designation given to the surface horizon of soil which appears to have an elevated organic content. No laboratory testing was performed on the topsoil to determine its suitability for supporting plant life, or ability to satisfy a particular specification. 3.3.2 RESIDUUM Residual soils were encountered beneath the topsoil layer and extended to boring termination at all of the boring locations. The residual soils consisted of medium stiff to very stiff Sandy SILT (ML), Sandy Elastic SILT (MH) and Elastic SILT with Sand (MH). 3.3.3 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION The borings were checked for groundwater during drilling and upon completion. Groundwater was apparent in 3 out of the 8 borings, B-1, B-2 and B-4 at depths of 17 to 18 feet during drilling and at a depth of 13 feet upon completion. The stabilized groundwater level in all other borings may have either been below the terminated depths of the borings or static levels were obscured as the on-site soils encountered were relatively impermeable. The borings were backfilled immediately upon completion, using the soil cuttings, for safety considerations. Therefore, delayed groundwater levels are not available. Measured Groundwater Boring Depth (feet) Boring Cave-in During At Depth (feet) depth drilling completion B-1 NA 13 20 14 B-2 17 13 20 17 B-3 NA NA 15 9 B-4 18 NA 20 11 1/2 B-5 NA NA 15 7 B-6 NA NA 10 6 '/2 B-7 NA NA 10 6 B-8 NA NA 10 5 The groundwater information presented in this report is the information that was collected at the time of our field activities. We recommend that the Contractor determine the actual groundwater level at the site at the time of the construction activities. Subsurface water levels within this region tend to fluctuate with seasonal and climatic changes, as well as with some types of construction operations. Generally, the highest groundwater levels occur in late winter and early spring; and the lowest levels in late summer and early fall. Therefore, water may be encountered during construction at depths not indicated during this study. Page 5 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18, 2023 Additionally, perched groundwater conditions can develop over low permeability soil or weathered rock following periods of heavy or prolonged precipitation. We anticipate groundwater may perch above the elastic SILTS encountered in the soil borings. Groundwater may be encountered during construction at depths not indicated during this exploration. 3.3.4 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS The results of the laboratory testing program are summarized in the following table. Sample Sample Moisture Percent ATTERBERG LIMITS USCS Location Depth Content /o)Fines LL PL PI Soil (/o) ((feet) Classification B-1 6—7 1/2 39 50.8 NP NP NP ML B-1 18 '/2- 20 30 -- NP NP NP ML B-2 13 '/2- 15 58 54.2 NP NP NP ML B-3 1 —2 1/2 24 83.1 73 38 35 MH* B-3 13 1/2- 15 70 -- -- -- -- MH* B-4 13 '/2- 15 54 -- NP NP NP ML B-5 8 '/2- 10 47 -- -- -- -- ML B-8 6—7 '/2 16 -- -- -- -- ML NP = Non-Plastic. *Typically, not recommended for direct support of foundations, slabs or pavements. 4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Highly plastic Elastic SILT (MH) was encountered at the site. These soils generally exhibit moderately to highly plastic properties and are typically susceptible to changes in volume with even slight changes in moisture content (i.e. shrink/swell behavior). As a result, MH soils are not recommended for direct support of foundations, slabs or pavements. For this site we recommend a minimum 2-foot thick buffer of low-plasticity structural fill material between these soils and slabs or foundations. A minimum of a 1-foot buffer would be recommended for the pavement areas. The extent of MH soils requiring undercutting during the proposed construction will be dependent upon proposed grading plans. When MH soils are encountered at or within 2 feet of the foundation or slab bearing elevation, they should be removed and replaced with low-plasticity structural fill as described above. Therefore, the project budget should include a contingency for the removal and replacement of residual MH soils to provide the buffers described above. The high plasticity MH soils should be replaced with properly compacted fill. In addition, MH soils are not recommended for reuse as structural fill and may consolidate if several feet of additional fill are added on top of the MH soils. Page 6 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 Based on finished site grades being approximately 10 to 15 feet higher than current, we anticipate the recommended buffers will be obtained by new fill placement and the majority of the highly plastic soils will not require undercutting and removal to obtain the recommended buffers in proposed fill areas. However, these MH soils will likely not pass a proofroll and will be difficult to dry and compact, especially if exposed to the elements or weather. Therefore, some undercutting and replacement or the placement of stone or aggregate may be required to achieve a stable platform for additional fill placement. Once site grades are finalized, we strongly recommend this information be provided so that potential consolidation or settlement due to the proposed fill weight can be evaluated. It may be necessary to surcharge or preload the residual soils in order to reduce potential settlement within tolerable levels.. High plasticity MH soils are moisture sensitive and will likely become unstable due to the presence of excess moisture and normal construction equipment traffic operating over them. Accordingly, construction traffic should be kept to a minimum on the exposed soils to reduce the potential for creating an unstable subgrade. Elevated moisture contents were noted in some of the recovered soil samples. Some drying and reworking of the on-site soils should be anticipated. The following geotechnical design recommendations are based on the information available on the proposed construction, the data obtained from our SPT soil borings, and our engineering studies on the existing soils on this site. Because the borings represent a limited statistical sampling of the subsurface materials, conditions encountered during construction may be different from those encountered in our borings. In these instances, adjustments to the design and construction may be necessary depending on the actual conditions encountered. If there is any change in the project criteria, including structural loading, the location or orientation of structures, or if the construction of earth retaining walls are required, PSI should be allowed to review the plan to determine if additional fieldwork and/or any modifications to our recommendations will be required. Once final design plans and specifications are available, a general review by PSI is recommended as a means to check that the evaluations made in preparation of this report are correct and that earthwork and foundation recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Based on the results of our field exploration, we anticipate site preparation procedures to include the steps listed below. All work should be carried out in accordance with current regulatory criteria. The earthwork, testing, and foundation inspection required herein should be performed under the supervision of PSI personnel. Site clearing, stripping and grubbing operations should only be performed in dry weather conditions. Initially, wet soils, topsoil, organics, debris and other unsuitable materials, should be stripped from an area extending at least ten feet beyond the outline of the proposed construction. Removal of trees should also include removal of their stumps and root balls, which can extend to several feet below Page 7 of 19 Proposed Waffle House Restaurant, Denver, NC tonPSI Report No.05111114 August 18,2023 grade. Removal of the near-surface, high plasticity MH soils as discussed in Section 4.1 will also be required. Depressions or low areas resulting from stripping and grubbing or removal of utility lines, septic systems, and other subsurface appurtenances should be backfilled with compacted structural fill in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. All unsuitable materials resulting from the clearing and demolition operations should be wasted in non-structural areas or legally disposed off-site. Based on grading plans, the need for undercutting of near surface plastic residual MH soils is not anticipated to provide adequate buffers for structural elements, however; may be required to provide a firm and stable subgrade for placement of new fill. Actual extents and depths of required undercut will be dependent upon final site grades and will be determined in the field by PSI personnel during grading operations. We do not recommend that the on-site Sandy Elastic SILT (MH) soils be reused as structural fill. We caution that the subgrade soils exposed after stripping may contain sufficient silt to render them both moisture sensitive and frost susceptible. Due to their moisture sensitivity, proper site drainage should be maintained during earthwork operations to reduce accumulation of moisture and wet weather delays.These soils may become unstable due to the presence of excess moisture and normal construction equipment traffic operating over them. Accordingly, construction traffic should be kept to a minimum on the exposed soils to reduce the potential for creating an unstable subgrade. If the surface soils become softened/unstable during wet weather or frozen, these soils should be removed before additional fill is placed. Drying soils for re-use as structural fill is often considered a routine aspect of typical grading operations and is not considered a pay item. However, the silt soils encountered at the site will be more difficult to dry and compact than most area soils typically considered suitable for support of commercial construction. If unit prices for earthwork operations are established, they should be examined closely before the contract is executed. If undercutting is a pay item, then undercut volumes should be determined by field measurement. Methods such as counting trucks should not be used for determination of undercut volume, as they are less accurate. Due to the presence of elevated in-situ moistures for the site soils, some drying should be expected. Recommended criteria for soil fill characteristics(both on-site and imported materials)and compaction procedures are listed below. The project design documents should include the following recommendations to address proper placement and compaction of project fill materials. Earthwork operations should not begin until representative samples are collected and tested. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content should be determined. Site preparation procedures should include stripping, removal of unsuitable surface soils, and rough excavation grading,we recommend that areas to provide support for the floor slabs, pavements,and/or structural fill be evaluated for the presence of soft, surficial soils and/or plastic soils by proofrolling and inspection by the Geotechnical Engineer. The proofroll should be performed using a loaded tandem axle dump truck, or similar rubber-tired equipment, weighing between 15 and 25 tons. The vehicle should make at least four passes over each location, with the last two passes perpendicular to the first two. Areas that wave, rut, or deflect significantly and continue to do so after several passes of the proofroller should be undercut to firmer soils as recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer. Based on the borings, some over-excavation of high plastic soils should be expected. Undercut areas should be backfilled in thin lifts with approved, compacted fill materials. Proofroll operations should be monitored carefully by PSI's Project Geotechnical Engineer. Page 8 of 19