Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0040918_Comments_20190503 Clean Water for fs North Carolina May 3, 2019 DWR Wastewater Permitting Via email to publiccomments(@ncdenr.gov Subject: Comments of Clean Water for North Carolina on "North Toe Mines" Dear DWR Discharge Permitting Staff: Clean Water for NC is a 501 c3 statewide science-based Environmental Justice organization with members in over 60 NC counties. On behalf of our members and allies in Mitchell and Yancey Counties, we are writing to call for permit provisions for the 6 Avery and Mitchell County mines that will be significantly more protective of the Toe River for aquatic life, recreation, aesthetics and as a reliable and safe secondary drinking water source for the town of Spruce Pine. The current permits for these mines are significantly too weak to protect folks who might have to drink water from the Toe River, but also fail to protect the river's aquatic life, and recreational users from high turbidity (cloudiness), the highly caustic hydrofluoric acid which has been spilled into the River before, and a variety of toxic metals likely to be in the mines' wastewater. The current permits for these mines are also inadequately protective of the River as a secondary drinking water source. For to long, these mines have been allowed to pollute this magnificent waterway, which belongs to the people and aquatic life of the Toe River region, and has been treated instead as a wastewater pipe for a group of large mining operations that supply quartz to high tech industries. Specific weaknesses of these permits include: 1) As the new Water Quality Standards were approved by the EMC by November, 2014 and the USEPA by April, 2016, the implementation of the new numeric standards for metals and the associated hardness instream data to calculate them, should have been accomplished as part of the pre-permitting process, rather than issuing a draft that will only start the process of collecting hardness data to calculate the dissolved metal numeric standards for critical metals likely to be in the mines' discharges. 2) Fluoride and total suspended solids have a daily limit which is meaningless, though the mines' discharges are only regulated on the basis of a weekly average and are only actually measured MONTHLY, rendering the daily limit essentially meaningless. No attention is being paid to the cumulative impact of these discharges; if more than one of these facilities discharged at the daily maximum, the consequences for water quality and aquatic life would be devastating. 3) As chloride levels downstream of one of these facilities have substantially violated instream water quality standards, a discharge limit for chloride must be provided, and chloride analyzed daily, rather than merely quarterly monitoring. 4) There must be specific standards and required sampling sufficient to assure that "narrative standards" for protecting fishing, recreation, aquatic life, and aesthetics are protected. Based on photos we have seen, the instream conditions frequently violate the trout stream NC 10 NTU limit without any other sources contributing. The permit must include a method for reliable and several times daily sampling and measurement downstream of each of these mines, with stipulated penalties for violations, with increasing violations for increasing opacity and/or frequency of exceedances, sufficient to prevent ongoing occurrences. 5) If currently available stormwater data indicates a contribution of any chemical or physical component that has at least a 50% chance of violating any instream WQ standard, DWR should not wait for the expiration of the Stormwater General Permit to require application for a specific permit for any facility which is documented as contributing such pollutants. 6) We appreciate the reopener clauses in these permits for turbidity and other parameters, but given the long delays that such a reopening process can entail, a more precautionary approach of incorporating strict sample collection and analysis, frequent visual inspection reports on equipment and emergency ponds, and photographic evidence of river conditions should have been required in the permit. Thank you very much for holding a public hearing for these permits, which we understand was well-attended and in which most speakers called for more protective permit conditions. These mining operations have had far too much freedom to degrade the North Toe River and impair the conditions that protect the many uses and needs the River must be allowed to provide. Yours sincerely, Hope Taylor, MSPH, Exec. Director, Clean Water for North Carolina hope(@cwfnc.org 919-401-9600