470003_Sludge Plan of Removal WUP_20240131

Vfflfls Nursery Ueanr ow
TMS P�afl has been prepared for:
Wayne Willis
Wayne Willis
705 McDonald Ave
Raeford, NC 28376
7/25/2023
Th6s plan has been deveHoped by.
NCDAICS-DSWC
Sam Edwards
5798 Joe Brown Hwy. South
Chadbourn, NC 28431
910-770-2168
Developer Signature
Type of Man: Nutlent HI anagement wRh Uosure Ueanout OMy
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (manager or producer)
70 Z
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
5-7
Man Approved By:
Ir- ZOZ
Technical Specialist Signature Date

Willis Nursery Clean -Out
7/25/2023
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Closure Clean -out Only
Narrative:
This plan was designed for Wayne Willis Nursery, a 3552 head wean to feeder swine facility. This is a
clean out plan used in conjunction with the North Carolina Ag-Cost share Program BMP Bio-solids
Removal Practice.
The rates have been reduced to meet cost share BMP objectives. PLAT has been run on all new
application fields and reduced to be applied at the phosphorus application rate to 50% of what may be
applied under a nitrogen based bio-solids application plan, unless otherwise recommended by
NCDA&CS soil test recommendations.
Methodology for sludge removal is agitation followed by Pump and Haul to to applied up to 30 days
pre -plant corn crop. The application window for Corn grain is Feb 15 through June 15. Animal waste is
not to be applied before or after these dates using this plan.
Make sure the correct column is read when applying waste. Maps are provided with the setbacks and
usable acres.
An updated slurry sample must be taken once lagoon has been agitated to meet permit rules. This
sample is to be used when filling out SLUR 1 and 2 .
The producer needs to get a sludge potential impact on site form signed by all landowners that sludge
is being applied on. Contractors or producers should flag all setbacks cited below to make sure
operators do not apply in setback areas.
These setbacks must be followed:
75-foot distance to a perennial stream/river other than an irrigation ditch or canal
(House Bill 515)
75-foot distance to a residential property boundary (House Bill 515)
200' from dwelling not owned by producer.
100' from a well
25' From field ditch or canal
9/25/2023 1:37:38 PM 1 / 1

Waste Storage Closure Source Description
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
SOURCE: Willis Lagoon
Date Measured: 11/29/2022
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 299 X 94; BOTTOM - 239 X 34; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Liquid Depth: 1.50 ft.; Liquid Volume: 184,592 gallons
Sludge Depth: 6.10 ft.; Sludge Volume: 648,743 gallons.
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W002691
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W002691
U 1003
Willis Lagoon is a 3552 head wean to feeder nursery with an animal waste storage structure. There are an
estimated 833,335 gals in this structure prior to bio-solids removal.
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Application Method
(Ibs N/1000 gals)
Source Total (Ibs)
Injected
19.34
16,096
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
19.34
16,096
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
16.12
13,414
Broadcast
16.12
13,414
Irrigated
16.12
13,414
Max. Available PAN (Ibs)
Actual PAN Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus / Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
13,414
16,657
(3,243)
1,034,830
(201,495)
* Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
9/22/2023 5:03:22 PM 1 / 1

Sources in Plan
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U 1003
Willis Lagoon waste generated 833,335 gals/year by a 3255 head Swine Lagoon Sludge -
Wean -Feeder operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
16,096
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
16,096
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
13,414
Broadcast
13,414
Irrigated
13,414
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
13,414
16,657
(3,243)
1,034,830
(201,495)
9/22/2023 5:02:59 PM 1 / 1

Planned Crops Summary
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
9/22/2023 5:03:46 PM 1 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
Tract Field Total Wettable SMU LI Crop Name RYE Recom- PLAT P205 (lbs/acre)
Acres Acres mended Rating Crop
PAN Removal Applied
1205 - 1 18 16.1 NoA 18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
1 37
NA
1205 -
2
10
8.6
NoA
18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
1 37
NA
1205 -
3
21.7
20.2
NoA
18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
37
NA
1205 -
4
31.3
29.3
NoA
18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
1 37
NA
1239.
1
53
51.4
DpA
7.7
Corn, Grain 84 Bushels 61
Low
1 37
NA
1239 -
2
10
9.1
Wa6
17
Corn, Grain
59 Bushels
45
Low
26
NA
2569 -
1
21.7
21.7
BaB
7.7
Corn, Grain
52 Bushels
38
Medium
23
NA
2573 -
1
11
7.4
NoA
18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
37
NA
2573 -
2-3
24
20.4
NoA
18
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
66
Low
1 37
NA
2573 -
4-5
13.4
12.5
Co
1 5.7
Corn, Grain
87 Bushels 65
Medium
38
NA
2573 -
6-7
32
29
No6
18
Ell
Corn, Grain
83 Bushels
65
Low
37
NA
2576 -
1
28.6
28.6
CaB
17
Corn, Grain
46 Bushels
33
Low
1 20
NA
2783 -
1
21.2
19
Dn
1 5.7
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
61
Medium
37
NA
2784 -
2
18.4
17
WaB
18
Corn, Grain 59 Bushels 45 Low 26 NA
Totals:
314.30
290.30
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
9/22/2023 5:03:46 PM 2 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
None
<2
leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> = 2 & < = 10
leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone.
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
9/22/2023 5:03:46 PM 3 / 3

Land Application Table
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
Req'd
Applied
Manure
Applic.
Crop
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Applied
Amount
Source
Total
Wettable
PLAT
Applic.
Applic.
1000
(Inches/
Tract
Field
ID
SMU
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
gal/Acre
Acre)
1205
1
1003
NoA
18
16.1
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
1205
2
1003
NoA
10
8.6
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
1205
3
1003
NoA
21.7
20.2
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
1205
4
1003
NoA
31.3
29.3
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
1239
1
1003
DpA
53
51.4
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
61
61
3.79
0.14
Bushels
6/30
1239
2
1003
WaB
10
9.1
Low
Corn, Grain
59
2/15 -
Broadcast
45
45
2.79
0.1
Bushels
6/30
2569
1
1003
BaB
21.7
21.7
Medium
Corn, Grain
52
2/15 -
Broadcast
38
38
2.36
0.09
Bushels
6/30
2573
1
1003
NoA
11
7.4
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
2573
2-3
1003
NoA
24
20.4
Low
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
66
66
4.10
0.15
Bushels
6/30
2573
4-5
1003
Co
13.4
12.5
Medium
Corn, Grain
87
2/15 -
Broadcast
65
65
4.04
0.15
Bushels
6/30
2573
6-7
1003
NoB
32
29
Low
Corn, Grain
83
2/15 -
Broadcast
65
65
4.04
0.15
Bushels
6/30
2576
1
1003
CaB
28.6
28.6
Low
Corn, Grain
46
2/15 -
Broadcast
33
33
2.05
0.08
Bushels
6/30
2783
1
1003
Dn
21.2
19
Medium
Corn, Grain
84
2/15 -
Broadcast
61
61
3.79
0.14
Bushels
6/30
NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
9/22/2023 5:05:15 PM 1 / 2

2784 2 1003 WaB 18.4 17 Low Corn, Grain 59 2/15 - Broadcast 45 45 2.79 0.1
Bushels 6/30
NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
Willis Nursery Clean -Out Summar.
Source Volume Available: 833,335 gals
Source Volume Applied: 1,034,830 gals
Excess Volume Remaining: (201,495) gals
9/22/2023 5:05:15 PM 2 / 2

Waste Utilization Table
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
1205 -
1
* 1003
NoA
18.00
16.10
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
65.98
0
1205 -
2
* 1003
NoA
10.00
8.60
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
35.24
0
1205 -
3
* 1003
NoA
21.70
20.20
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
82.78
0
1205 -
4
* 1003
NoA
31.30
29.30
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
120.07
0
1239 -
1
* 1003
DpA
53.00
51.40
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*61
0
0
Broad.
61
3.79
0
194.68
0
1239 -
2
* 1003
WaB
10.00
9.10
Corn, Grain
59 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*45
0
0
Broad.
45
2.79
0
25.43
0
2569 -
1
* 1003
BaB
21.70
21.70
Corn, Grain
52 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*38
0
0
Broad.
38
2.36
0
51.20
0
2573 -
1
* 1003
NoA
11.00
7.40
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
30.32
0
2573 -
2-3
* 1003
NoA
24.00
20.40
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*66
0
0
Broad.
66
4.10
0
83.60
0
2573 -
4-5
* 1003
Co
13.40
12.50
Corn, Grain
87 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*65
0
0
Broad.
65
4.04
0
50.45
0
2573 -
6-7
* 1003
NoB
32.00
29.00
Corn, Grain
83 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*65
0
0
Broad.
65
4.04
0
117.04
0
2576 -
1
* 1003
CaB
28.60
28.60
Corn, Grain
46 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*33
0
0
Broad.
33
2.05
0
58.60
0
9/22/2023 5:04:18 PM 1 / 2

Waste Utilization Table
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
2783 -
1
* 1003
Dn
21.20
19.00
Corn, Grain
84 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*61
0
0
Broad.
61
3.79
0
71.96
0
2784 -
2
* 1003
1 WaB
18.40
17.00
Corn, Grain
59 Bushels
2/15-6/30
*45
0
0
Broad.
45
2.79
0
47.50
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,034.83
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
833.34
Balance, 1000 gallons
(201.49)
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 1. Symbol * means user entered data.
9/22/2023 5:04:18 PM 2 / 2

Soil Metal Indices
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following table
provides a conservative(maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values.* Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is recommended
that conservative soil target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-1 < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn=1 < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown; for other cropland
Zn-1 < 700-1000). Alternative application sites should be selected if the following table indicates that concentrations of these metals may approach excessive
levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
Applic
Waste
Waste
Soil Test
Soil Test
Cu-I
Zn-I
Estimated New
Number Date
ID
Inches
Cu ppm
Zn ppm
Cu-I
Zn-I
Adj.
Adj.
Soil Cu-I Soil Zn-I
1205
1
SL029906
04/24/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
44
65
122
759
166.00
824.00
1201S
1205
2
SL024737
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
38
62
122
759
160.00
821.00
1S120
1205
3
SL024737
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
45
75
122
759
167.00
834.00
BS120
1205
4
SL024737
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
48
71
122
759
170.00
830.00
CS120
1239
1
SL002059 1 S
08/23/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.14
128.17
1575.62
50
103
113
702
163.00
805.00
1239
2
SL002059 2S
08/23/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.10
128.17
1575.62
67
185
83
518
150.00
703.00
2569
1
SL029902
4/24/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.09
128.17
1575.62
271
231
70
437
341.00
668.00
2561S
2573
1
SL024831
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
178
231
122
759
300.00
990.00
1S257
2573
2-3
SL024831
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
115
93
122
759
237.00
852.00
BS257
1
1
1
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
9/22/2023 5:06:09 PM 1 / 4

Soil Metal Indices
2573
4-5
SL024831
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
125
130
120
748
245.00
878.00
65257
2573
6-7
SL024831
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.15
128.17
1575.62
213
215
120
748
333.00
963.00
85257
2576
1
SL033400
6/7/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.08
128.17
1575.62
445
285
61
380
506.00
665.00
2576S
2783
1
SL024708
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.14
128.17
1575.62
113
126
113
702
226.00
828.00
15246
2784
2
SL024708
3/3/2023
Corn, Grain
1003
0.10
128.17
1575.62
98
178
83
518
181.00
696.00
BS246
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
9/22/2023 5:06:09 PM 3 / 4

Required Soil Test Values
Willis Nursery Clean -Out
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop
based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes, these
recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are maintained.
Tract ID
Field ID
Crop(s)
pH
Lime Recom.
for Crop(s)
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper
Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc
Recommendation
1205
1
Corn grain
5.8
0,0
44
0
65
0
1205
2
Corn grain
5.8
0,0
38
0
62
0
1205
3
Corn grain
6.4
0,0
45
0
75
0
1205
4
Corn grain
5.8
0,0
48
0
71
0
1239
1
Corn grain
5.9
0,0
50
0
103
0
1239
2
Corn grain
5.6
0.5, 0
67
0
185
0
2569
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn grain
5
0.9, 0
271
0,0
231
0,0
2573
1
Corn grain
5.2
0.6, 0
178
0
231
0
2573
2-3
Corn grain
4.7
1, 0
115
0
93
0
2573
4-5
Corn grain
5.4
0.9, 0
125
0
130
0
2573
6-7
Corn grain
4.8
1, 0
213
0
215
0
2576
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn grain
5.1
0.7, 0
445
0,0
285
0,0
2783
1
Corn grain
5.2
0.7, 0
113
0
126
0
2784
2
Corn grain
5.8
0,0
98
0
178
0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
Cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
9/22/2023 5:06:55 PM 1 / 1

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD
NRCS
910-433-3300
910.848.8032
910.848.8032
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:-
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

gNRCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for: —Wayne Willis
By: Sam Edward
Farm: Tract(s):
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
Date:_10J_31J_2023
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncaqr.gov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
ht4o.-Anutrients. soil. ncsu. edu/index.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
htto://www. ncagr. gov/SWC/tech/12l7committee. ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P 'drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index.php
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

■ a,
�.,. �a Pe,, Hsa naat,
\ %
a
ours Ai.CPfl services
R

Google Earth
k �
A+ N
400n I

F1239 F1
wt descriptio
& F2
mrv0ur map.
gle,Earth
a.
Tract 12`,c
Field 2
9.1 Ac
odd �
t
�Srp
a%
�1
r N
�tDuke Energy F'aeford South 1100 f[

Google Eai
N
1000 ft

l t
9a 34
mom
1 -
a^j
Vill N
Goy gle Earth oon 1

PAN Application Rates (lb/ac) by Field and Crop
Tract
Field
Acres
Crop PAN Application Rates: (Plant Availble Nutrients Per Acre)
Corn Wheat S/G
Grain Grain Overseed
Application Windows
2/15-6/15
1205
1
16.1
66
1205
2
8.6
66
1205
3
20.2
66
1205
4
29.3
66
2573
1
7.4
66
2573
23
20.4
66
2573
45
12.5
65
2573
67
29
65
2783
1
19
61
2784
2
17
45
2569
1
21.7
38
1239
1
51.4
61
1239
2
9.1
45
2576
1
28.6
33
Corn, Grain
Total Acres
Total lbs. PAN for all acres (by crop)

VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
Length (Top)
299.00
Width (Top)
94.00
Total Depth
10.00
Side Slopes
3 Note: Enter horizontal # for side slopes
Liquid Depth (ft)
1.15 Example: For 3:1 side slopes, enter 3
Sludge Depth (ft)
6.10
Freeboard (ft)
2.40
Length
Width
Lagoon Dims. @ Liquid Level
284.60
79.60
Lagoon Dims. @ Sludge Level
277.68
72.68
Lagoon Dims. @ Bottom
241.08
36.08
Cubic Feet Gallons
Liquid Depth 241678 184,592
Sludge Depth 86,730 648,743
Total 111,408 833,335

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 1205
Field ID:
Field ID: 1
Soil Series:
NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.6 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
73
WV Factor (USER) 1.33
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 3
Total P Rating = 4 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 1205
Field ID:
Field ID: 2
Soil Series:
NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.21 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
71
WV Factor (USER) 1.41
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 3
Total P Rating = 4 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 1205
Field ID: Field ID: 3
Soil Series: NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .21 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 99
WV Factor (USER) 1.34
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 5
Total P Rating = 6 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 1205
Field ID:
Field ID: 4
Soil Series:
NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.21 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
144
WV Factor (USER) 1.36
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 2
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 3
Total P Rating = 5 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 1239
Field ID: Field ID: 1
Soil Series: DpA: Duplin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.8 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .6 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 128
WV Factor (USER) 1.55
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 7
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 18
Total P Rating = 25 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 1239
Field ID:
Field ID: 2
Soil Series:
WaB: Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 2.8 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.25 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
101
WV Factor (USER) 1.29
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 1
Total P Rating = 2 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 2569
Field ID:
Field ID: 1
Soil Series:
BaB: Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 2.4 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
7 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 251
WV Factor (USER) 1.43
Soil Test 28" to 32" 11
WV Factor (USER) 1.18
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 4
Soluble P = 20
Leachate P = 4
Source P = 8
Total P Rating 36 (Medium)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 2573
Field ID:
Field ID: 1
Soil Series:
NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.21 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
140
WV Factor (USER) 1.32
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 2
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 3
Total P Rating = 5 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 2573
Field ID: Field ID: 2-3
Soil Series: NoA: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .21 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 109
WV Factor (USER) 1.31
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 5
Total P Rating = 6 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 2573
Field ID: Field ID: 4-5
Soil Series: Co: Coxville loam
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .82 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 67
WV Factor (USER) 1.16
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 10
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 37
Total P Rating = 47 (Medium)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 2573
Field ID: Field ID: 6-7
Soil Series: NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 4 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .32 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 144
WV Factor (USER) 1.31
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 3
Total P Rating = 4 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 2576
Field ID:
Field ID: 1
Soil Series:
CaB: Candor sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 2.1 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.05 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
190
WV Factor (USER) 1.48
Soil Test 28" to 32"
33
WV —Factor (USER) 1.4
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 12
Source P = 1
Total P Rating = 14 (Low)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County: Hoke
Tract ID: Tract ID: 2783
Field ID: Field ID: 1
Soil Series: Dn: Dunbar loam
Crop: Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 3.8 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss: .4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 118
WV Factor (USER) 1.3
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 15
Leachate P = 0
Source P = 35
Total P Rating = 50 (Medium)

PLAT Results For: Hoke 9/22/2023 12:00:00 AM
INPUTS
County:
Hoke
Tract ID:
Tract ID: 2784
Field ID:
Field ID: 2
Soil Series:
WaB: Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Crop:
Corn, Grain: Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width
Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers:
Willis Lagoon
Yearly Applied Amount: 2.8 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 59.51 lbs
Application Method: Broadcast
Soil Loss:
.25 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4"
132
WV Factor (USER) 1.48
Soil Test 28" to 32"
7
WV Factor (USER) 1.14
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
Particulate P = 0
Soluble P = 1
Leachate P = 3
Source P = 1
Total P Rating = 5 (Low)