Plan For PN

ID#* 20230137 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Blake Hartshorn
Initial Review Completed Date 08/05/2024
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/31/2024
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Jordan Burbage [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20230137 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site
County: Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 240731 New Farm 20230137v2 NOBMP Final.pdf 30.11 MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jordan Burbage
Signature: *
0 0me"?-r owtxki v

Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Site
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201 (excluding the Falls Lake Watershed)
Wayne County, NC
DWR Project #: 2023-0137 V2
SPONSORED BY: PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR:
J
_ D_E
�+ ^ V- l��y NORTH CAROLINA \\\
eco terra,,
{ 1., Oeparlmenlaf Enimnmental QualiQ�
I I `.1 MCADAMS
117 Centrewest Court 621 Hillsborough St 1617 Mail Service Center
Cary, NC 27513 Suite 500 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Raleigh, NC 27603
J U LY 2024

� MCADAMS
July 30, 2025
Katie Merritt
NCDEQ— DWR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
RE: New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
NCDWR Project #2023-0137 V2
Response to 1st Review Comments
ECT22003
The following are the response comments for the above -mentioned project. Our response comments are in bold.
Please note, one change was made that was not in response to a specific comment. The proposed vegetation plot
locations were modified due to the number of proposed plots being reduced from 17 to 16. The proposed locations
are depicted in Figure 8 - Planting Plan & Monitoring Map.
NCDEQ— DWR REVIEW
Blake Hartshorn 919. 707. 3684
Katie Merritt 919. 707. 3637
Page Label is
1. Change DWR Project # to V2 [2023-0137-V2].
McAdams Response: The DWR Project Number has been updated to say "2023-0137 V2".
Page Label iii:
2. [Tables] Change Table 10 header to read "Project Credit Table as is what is referenced in the template UBI.
McAdams Response: The header has been updated to read "Project Credits Table".
3. [Figures] Change Figure 7 to exclude monitoring plots. See comments on Figure 7 for editing requirements.
McAdams Response: Veg plots have been moved to Figure 8 - Planting Plan & Monitoring Map.
4. [Figures] Add a Figure 8 to represent "Planting Plan & Monitoring Map".
McAdams Response: Figure 8 - Planting Plan & Monitoring Map has been added.
creating experiences through experience 621 Hillsborough Street, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27603 / 919. 361. 5000

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
5. [Appendices] These photos pre -date the viability site visit by DWR. Include more updated photos that are dated
closer to the date of the Plan submittal. Make sure the photos included will be timestamped and represent the
riparian areas adjacent to the streams and the ditch. DWR is not suggesting replacing the photos, just adding a
new set of more recently taken photos depicting site conditions.
McAdams Response: Site photos taken on July 10, 2024 have been added to the Appendix A.
Page Label 4:
6. [Section 1.0 Introduction] This sentence is very long, slightly confusing to understand who the "Sponsor" is.
Clean this sentence up a little to make it clear the Sponsor is Terra 2023, LLC.
McAdams Response: The sentence has been updated to clarify that Terra 2023, LLC is the Bank Sponsor.
7. [Section 1.0 Introduction] UBI should be UMBI since there are both nutrient offsets AND mitigation.
McAdams Response: The document has been updated so that all instances where "Umbrella Banking
Instrument" or "UBI" were used now read "Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument" or "UMBI"
respectively.
Page Label 6:
8. [Section 2.2 Existing Conditions] While this language does clarify no changes have occurred, photos need to be
included in the Plan that support this statement.
McAdams Response: Photos taken on July 10, 2024 support the statement and have been added to the
Appendix A.
Page Label 7:
9. [Table 2: Project Attributes] I recommend the 12 digit HUC here.
McAdams Response: The HUC has been updated to the 12-digit HUC.
Label Page 9:
10. [Section 2.6 Vegetation] There is mention to bushhogging the top of banks before planting, but I'm not sure
what the purpose of bushhogging or mowing is. Explain the vegetation along the banks of where the Sponsor is
planning to mow/bushhog, so I/we can understand the intent of this necessity.
McAdams Response: To clarify, bushhogging is not planned for the streambanks. This description has
been added to Section 2.6. In between D2 and S2, herbaceous vegetation extends approximately 30 to 80-
feet from the top of bank to active row crops. These areas will need to be mowed prior to planting so that
equipment can access and mechanically plant the riparian area up to and including the top of streambank.
creating experiences through experience 2 of 9

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
Label Page 10:
11. Culverts are also considered constraints. Acknowledge those culverts here and reference Figure 3 where I need
you to add the location of existing culvert.
McAdams Response: The survey crew did not pick up any culverts and a site visit was conducted on July
10, 2024 confirming that no culverts exist on this reach.
Page Label 11:
12. [Section 4.0 Mitigation Work Plan] Since there are no riparian areas less than 50', change 30 to 50. Nutrient
offset isn't viable off widths less than 50, so by making sure you tell me the site isn't less than 50', it helps me
know that the entire site will likely be convertible to NOC.
McAdams Response: The paragraph has been updated to indicate a minimum buffer width of 50 feet.
13. [Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation] Add details about culvert removal, bank stabilization where culverts are
removed is required to ensure banks are not eroding and contributing nutrients or sediment to the streams.
McAdams Response: The survey crew and a subsequent field visit conducted on July 10, 2024 could not
locate the referenced culvert. A note has been added that if the culvert is encountered during the Site
Preparation, it will be removed and the banks stabilized.
14. [Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation] Bushhogging invasives between the rows is not an activity DWR supports as a
standard response to handling invasives or herbaceous competition. This could be done.
McAdams Response: Sentence has been reworded to include bushhogging prior to planting as a means for
invasive plant removal during parcel preparation.
Page Label 12:
15. [Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation] Explain what exactly will be considered "dense vegetation" that will be mowed.
Clarify that trees will not be mowed prior to planting.
McAdams Response: A description of the existing herbaceous vegetation was added to Section 2.6 and an
explanation for mowing was added to Section 4.1. The statement "No trees will be removed" has been
added to Section 4.1.
16. [Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation] More detail surrounding the placement of hay bales is needed. How will the hay
bales be secured? Will there be trees planted within the swale, any live staking in the hay (we've seen this in all
cases where hay bales are used to control sediment), any coir matting used ... etc. Just back filling with hay bales
and dirt isn't likely to resolve the sediment loss on this steep sloped area long term.
McAdams Response: Additional details have been provided for stabilizing the swale, see Section 4.1 Parcel
Preparation.
creating experiences through experience 3 of 9

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
17. [Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation] All rills and erosional features... These areas need to be identified at this stage in
the process. Figure 3 needs to show where these areas are and how prevalent it is observed for this Mitigation
Plan. If things change between now and AsBuilt, then Terra can inform DWR of those changes prior to the Task 2
site walk. DWR will be observing these areas during the As -Built walk.
McAdams Response: Areas of erosional concern have been added to Figure 3 (Existing Conditions Map).
18. [Section 4.2 Restoration Activities] Add a Site Plan Map that shows "areas to be planted" and reference that
figure in this section.
McAdams Response: Figure 8 - Planting Plan & Monitoring Map has been added to NOBMP and
referenced in Section 4.3 (formerly Section 4.2).
19. [Section 4.2 Restoration Activities] What trees were ID'd in the reference survey? This information should be in
the Plan and provided under Existing Conditions.
McAdams Response: A summary of observed existing vegetation has been added to the Existing
Conditions Section 2.6.
20. [Section 4.2 Restoration Activities] Change Spring 2024 to another acceptable time frame.
McAdams Response: The sentence has been updated to say that planting is planned for Spring 2025. The
schedule has been updated throughout the document to reflect this updated timeframe.
Page Label 13:
21. [Table 8: Proposed Planting Plan] This column isn't necessary since the entire site is being planted with MMHF.
McAdams Response: The planting zone column and associated footnote has been removed from Table 8.
22. [Table 8: Proposed Planting Plan] These 13 species all add up to 100% density to be planted, however, the text
above in 4.2 doesn't specifically state 13 species will be planted, instead it says a minimum of 8. If at least 8
species will be planted, then Sponsor needs to identify which 8 of the 13 are their primary species and then
select the remaining 5 that will be used as "substitutions" if any of the 8 primary species are not available.
Additionally, the Sponsor needs to include the % of those remaining 4 substitutions that may need to be utilized.
McAdams Response: The paragraph has been updated to indicate that all species listed in Table 8 are to
be planted in accordance to their respective percentages. As these species are subject to nursery
availability, if the species are unavailable, a new species list will be submitted for DWR approval.
23. [Table 8: Proposed Planting Plan] Add a column for "Tree/Shrub" and add that information for each species
proposed.
McAdams Response: A Tree/Shrub column has been added to Table 8.
creating experiences through experience 4 of 9

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
24. [Section 4.3 DWR As -Built Evaluation] Add language to this section identifying what activities should be
completed at this stage: including adequately marking the easement boundaries, installing all the plots,
plantings completed, culvert maintenance complete (if applicable), culvert removals (if applicable), bank
stabilization measures, sediment and erosion controls of rills and gullies, etc.
McAdams Response: A description of completed activities has been included in Section 4.4 (formerly
Section 4.3).
25. [Section 5.1 Performance Standards] Correct the reference from UBI to UMBI throughout.
McAdams Response: All UBI and Umbrella Banking Instrument references have been changed to UMBI
and Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, respectively.
Page Label 14:
26. [Section 5.2 Monitoring] Clarify that the number of plots is in fact making up 2 percent of the planted area, not
the mitigation area. Therefore, Preservation wouldn't be included in these totals. What is the total planted area
in acres?? According to the DRAFT project credit table, it's about 19 acres.
McAdams Response: The number of plots is based on the total planted area for credit. It does not include
the preservation area. Total planted area is 19.5 acres (849,506 sf). Calculation has been updated for the
revised credit areas.
27. [Section 5.2 Monitoring] Commit to including a photo representing the swale with each monitoring report. Since
this area is credit generating, it has to be planted and it has to be maintained throughout the 5 years to keep it
stable and functioning.
McAdams Response: A statement committing to photo documentation of the swale in each monitoring
report has been added to Section 5.2.
28. [Section 5.2 Monitoring] The new monitoring protocol for height and vigor is to record height for each stem in
each plot in years 1, 3 and 5. Average vigor per plot is to be recorded in years 1, 3, and 5. adjust language
accordingly. Remember that all other monitoring expectations are the same for years 1-5 consecutively. This
was voted on during the Fall Provider's meeting at DWR.
McAdams Response: Section 5.2 and Table 9 have been revised to reflect the new monitoring protocol.
Page Label 15:
29. [Section 5.4 Parcel Boundary Maintenance] Add that additional boundary markers will be added within the
utility crossing to clearly mark the easement.
McAdams Response: The paragraph has been updated to indicate that additional boundary markers will
be added with the utility to clearly mark the easement.
creating experiences through experience 5 of 9

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
30. [Section 5.4 Parcel Boundary Maintenance] Add language that if there are any encroachments within the
conservation easement that the Sponsor will notify DWR promptly, take corrective measures, provide written
notification to the landowner (or third party) and include all information in the monitoring report.
McAdams Response: A sentence has been added to Section 5.4 to indicate that the Sponsor will follow
proper procedures if encroachments are observed within the easement.
Page Label 16:
31. [Section 7.1 Credit Potential] If the entire easement boundary is going to be planted, it is assumed that this
means even the areas >200'. Back this statement up with supporting figure that shows "Planted Area".
McAdams Response: Section 7.1 has been revised to specifically describe the areas within the
conservation easement that will not be planted. The proposed planting area is shown on Figure 8 and is
referenced in Section 7.1.
Page Label 17:
32. [Table 10: Project Credits] Change title to be "Project Credit Table".
McAdams Response: The title for Table 10 has been updated to read "Project Credit Table".
33. [Table 10: Project Credits] Remove any area recorded in this column [Total Creditable Area of Buffer Mitigation]
if the credit type selected is nutrient offset and it is checked "NO" for buffer credit.
McAdams Response: Total (Creditable) Area of Buffer Mitigation column has been revised per comment.
34. [Table 10: Project Credits] Add a row showing non -diffused flow off D1 and check "No" for both buffer credit and
nutrient offset credit.
McAdams Response: D1 does not enter the easement boundary. S1 is the feature that enters the
boundary. As such, a reduction for diffuse flow is not applicable.
Figure 3 — Existing Conditions Map:
35. [D2 Origin] This area was described as dense herbs and invasives in the viability letter. How is this area being
addressed during the Site Preparation section?
McAdams Response: A description has been added to Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation.
36. [S2] There was a culvert found here during the site viability. Add a culvert here. Will this culvert be removed? If
so, state that in the Site Plan Map you create.
McAdams Response: Survey did not pick up a culvert at this location. The Sponsor has revisited the site on
07.10.24 and confirmed that a culvert does not exist on this stream. A statement has been added to
Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation that the if a culvert is found, it will be removed, streambanks stabilized and
planted as necessary.
creating experiences through experience 6 of 9

MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
37. [S2] Add a zoomed in "Call out" to D3. It's hard to tell if D3 is including in the CE or not.
McAdams Response: D3 feature has been added to Figure 3 and a description has been added to Section
2.2 Existing Conditions clarifying that it is within the Parcel but a non-credit area.
38. [Electric Utility Line Easement] This easement line appears to be on the DOT ROW... it is best to stay an
additional 10-20' off the R.O.W when at all possible to reduce risk of DOT mowing farther than their restricted
area.
McAdams Response: Conservation Easement has been revised as a 10' offset from DOT right-of-way.
39. Add any "major" areas of sink holes, gullies, swales, etc that will need to be addressed. Minor erosion and
erosion that continues to change course depending on the day, do not need to be called out. I remember more
issues than just the Swale.
McAdams Response: Additional erosional areas have been added to Figure 3.
Figure 7 — Draft Credit Generation Map:
40. [S2] At least 50' but no more than 100' can be measured off the S2. Here, there are no credits being measured
off S2 at this confluence with the ditch. Revise to show at least 50 but no more than 100' of restoration being
measured off S2.
McAdams Response: A 100' wide credit for buffer mitigation has been added to S2 upstream of
confluence with D2.
41. [PP3] Add a Photo Point for the Swale.
McAdams Response: A Photo Point has been added for the Swale to Figure 8.
42. [Center of parcel area] The tree line survey on Figure 3 shows a thin riparian buffer existing along S2. Modify the
restoration to be Preservation within the tree line boundaries as depicted on Figure 3. Update the project credit
table accordingly and any relevant text within the Plan.
McAdams Response: The tree line originally shown on Figure 3 was determined by survey location of
canopy and dense herbaceous vegetation and does not accurately depict the forested area that meets the
requirements to qualify as a designated Preservation Area. The Sponsor has revisited the site to validate
existing the tree line boundaries and proposed Preservation Areas. The tree line depicted on Figure 3,
project credit table and text in Section 2.2 have been revised accordingly.
43. [S1 Start] The ditch would be non -diffused flow... show that reduction here and add a line item to the Project
Credit Table showing that Ditch as non -diffused flow. Add the Clarification memo (referenced in the UMBI) to
the Appendix of this Plan.
McAdams Response: D1 does not enter the easement boundary. S1 is the feature that enters the CE. As
such, a deduction for diffuse flow and the Clarification Memo are not applicable.
creating experiences through experience 7 of 9

MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
44. [Electric Utility Line Easement] Add a call out here to show that the CE boundary within this crossing will be
marked differently than the rest of the easement - with more markers and even flagging to give this area a clear
boundary. Add text to section 5.4 to indicate this additional boundary marking within this crossing.
McAdams Response: A callout has been added to Figure 7 and text has been added to Section 5.4.
45. [Electric Utility Line Easement] What about these areas that are greater than 200', are they being planted, are
they considered "non=credit"? Explain in Section 7 and label accordingly.
McAdams Response: Figure 8 has been generated to show the area to be planted within the easement
boundary. Figure 7 has been revised to show all non-credit areas within the easement boundary. Text has
been added to Section 7.1 describing the non-credit areas and areas to be planted within the easement
boundary.
46. [Legend] Add "Riparian" to all these identifiers. example: Riparian Preservation.
McAdams Response: The Legend items have been revised.
47. [Legend] Show the width boundaries differently (see map). Each boundary (50, 100, 200) needs to be
represented in the legend. Currently, the lines are gray on the Figure and the gray lines represent all the
boundaries.
McAdams Response: 30, 50, 100, 200 ft boundary lines have been added to Figure 7 and 8. Existing credit
boundary lines have been changed from gray to their respective colors in the legend.
48. Remove plots from this Figure and create a separate figure for showing Plots and "Planted Area".
McAdams Response: Veg plots have been removed from Figure 7 and added to Figure 8 - Planting Plan &
Monitoring Map with the planting area.
49. [Title Block] Redefine this map and call it Riparian Mitigation Plan, Site Plan or Mitigation Work Plan, etc. Create
a separate map for the monitoring plots. This figure should provide credit assets as well as anything important
noted in the text of the Plan.
McAdams Response: Figure 7 has been renamed Riparian Mitigation Plan and Figure 8 — Planting Plan &
Monitoring Map has been generated.
Pages 30-31, Appendix A — Site Photographs:
50. These are actually great photos for representing the riparian conditions. Keep these photos but we need more
recent ones as well.
McAdams Response: Additional photos taken on July 10, 2024 have been added to Appendix A.
creating experiences through experience 8 of 9

� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22003
Consideration of this response is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919.361.5000.
Sincerely,
MCADAMS
Kerry Bray, PE
Senior Project Manager, Water Resources
KB/M FB/kt
creating experiences through experience 9 of 9

Eco Ter, I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table of Contents
NUTRIENT OFFSET & BUFFER MITIGATION PLAN
NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET & RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE................................................................I
1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY...............................................................................................................5
2.1
PROJECT GOALS.............................................................................................................................................. 5
2.2
EXISTING CONDITIONS......................................................................................................................................
5
2.3
PARCEL VIABILITY............................................................................................................................................7
2.4
WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION.......................................................................................................................
7
2.5
SOILS AND GEOLOGY........................................................................................................................................
8
2.6
VEGETATION...................................................................................................................................................9
2.7
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES............................................................................................................
9
2.8
CULTURAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................................................
10
2.9
FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND PERMITTING COMPLIANCE...........................................................................................
10
2.10
PARCEL CONSTRAINTS AND ACCESS..................................................................................................................
10
2.11
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS..............................................................................................................
10
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT AND LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT.............................................................11
4.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN.........................................................................................................................11
4.1
PARCEL PREPARATION....................................................................................................................................
11
4.2
PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES..............................................................................................................................
13
4.3
RESTORATION ACTIVITIES...............................................................................................................................
13
4.4
DWR AS -BUILT EVALUATION..........................................................................................................................
14
5.0 MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING PLAN..................................................................................................15
5.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS............................................................................................................................15
5.2 MONITORING............................................................................................................................................... 15
5.3 PARCEL MAINTENANCE.................................................................................................................................. 16
5.4 PARCEL BOUNDARY MAINTENANCE.................................................................................................................. 16
6.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES...........................................................................................................................17
6.1 PERFORMANCE AND MAINTENANCE BONDS...................................................................................................... 17
7.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS AND CREDIT RELEASE..................................................................................17
7.1 CREDIT POTENTIAL......................................................................................................................................... 17
7.2 CREDIT RELEASE............................................................................................................................................ 18
8.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................................20
�,� New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan ii
ecnkterm HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Tables
Table 1: Water Quality and Ecological Goals and Objectives.
Table 2: Project Attributes
Table 3: Project Features and Viability
Table 4: Drainage Area and Land Use
Table 5: Soil Series
Table 6: Federally Listed Species
Table 7: Landowner and Long-term Protection
Table 8: Proposed Plating Plan
Table 9: Monitoring Plan Components
Table 10: Project Credits Table
Figures
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Credit Service Area Map
Figure 3. Existing Conditions Map
Figure 4. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5. Drainage Area Map
Figure 6. NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 7. Riparian Mitigation Plan
Figure 8. Planting Plan & Monitoring Map
Appendices
Appendix A. Site Photographs — July 11, 2023 & July 10, 2024
Appendix B. Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix C. DWR Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules Letter — March 22, 2023
DWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter — October 24, 2023
Appendix D. USFWS List of Threatened and Endangered Species Letter — October 11, 2023
NCNHP Natural Heritage Resources Letter — October 12, 2022
Request for Cultural Resource Review to SHPO — September 7, 2023
SHPO Cultural Resource Review Letter — December 6, 2023
Appendix E. EDR Report — October 12, 2022
Appendix F. Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Letter of Intent — November 13, 2023
Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Estimate for Long-term Endowment
�, k New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
eCO,GrrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
iii
July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
1.0 Introduction
The New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Parcel) is located near Mount
Olive, NC, in the Thunder Swamp -Thoroughfare Swamp watershed of the Neuse River Basin. The
project site is situated along the north side of NC Highway 55 approximately 0.6 miles west of the
Suttontown Road intersection in Wayne County, NC (Figure 1). The Nutrient Offset & Buffer
Mitigation Plan (NOBMP) is being submitted for review under the proposed Terra Neuse 01
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) between the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (DWR) and the Bank Sponsor, Terra 2023, LLC (Sponsor). Terra 2023, LLC, is a
disregarded entity of Eco Terra, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company with further registration
with North Carolina Secretary of State. The proposed Parcel has been planned and designed
according to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 for buffer mitigation, 15A NCAC 02B .0703 for nutrient offsets,
and the UMBI since Rule .0703 doesn't specifically address riparian restoration for generating
nutrient offsets.
The Parcel is approximately 22.51 acres (ac), or 980,695 square feet (sgft), of a 35.6-ac tract that
encompasses a series of forked, interconnected ditches and unnamed tributaries to Thoroughfare
Swamp. The project is located within the Neuse River Basin 8-digit hydrological unit code (HUC)
03020201, commonly referred to as Neuse 01. The NOBMP is being submitted for riparian buffer
credit (RBC) and nutrient offset credit (NOC) in the service area designated by Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201, excluding Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2). The Parcel encompasses three
unnamed tributaries and one agricultural ditch that converge and flow into Thoroughfare Swamp,
approximately 1,300 linear feet downstream of the project area, and subsequently into Falling
Creek and the Neuse River.
The proposed project is expected to generate 480,169.348 (RBC) and 19,470.318 pounds (Ibs) of
nitrogen NOC. The final Parcel area will be delineated and depicted in the As -Built Survey and
submitted with the As -Built Survey. Therefore, credit totals may change slightly depending on the
As -Built Survey.
The Parcel will address agricultural runoff by reducing sediment and nutrient loading into the
unnamed tributaries and Thoroughfare Swamp. Thoroughfare Swamp is classified as Class C and
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by DWR. The project area and surrounding areas are open
agricultural land, primarily managed for sweet potatoes and soybeans. The proposed project will
improve terrestrial habitats along the streams and ditches by establishing and preserving the
riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas and allowing the land to undergo a natural succession
to a forested community. The project will restore forested riparian buffers and adjacent riparian
areas a minimum width of 50 feet from tops of banks and extend out to a maximum of
approximately 200 feet from the project features (streams and ditches) and will remove crop and
fertilizer inputs. The restored riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas will filter agricultural
runoff from the surrounding farm fields and provide shading to reduce stream temperatures and
improve aquatic habitat. Invasive vegetation will be managed as needed within the project area
to promote native vegetation.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 4
�CO'k rrQ.. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
The project involves the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers and adjacent riparian
areas along two unnamed tributaries and one ditch that flow to Thoroughfare Swamp. Land
disturbing activities include site preparation for planting trees to enhance the vegetative buffer
up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches within the approximate 22.51-acre project easement.
Historical land use has been agriculture for the past 70 years according to historical USDA aerials.
The project site will be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation easement that
will ultimately be transferred to a DWR-approved land trust for long-term stewardship according
to the UMBI.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goal of the proposed buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration is to improve water
quality through ecological enhancements within the Neuse River Basin. This will be accomplished
with specific goals to address agricultural runoff, including nutrients and sediment, restore
terrestrial habitat and protect the project parcel in perpetuity. This aligns with DWR's Neuse River
Basin Restoration Priorities which include "promote nutrient and sediment reduction in
agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers." Specific
goals and objectives are outlined in Table 1.
Table 7: Water Quality and Ecological Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent riparian
Reduce nutrient loading
areas to filter runoff and subsurface flows from adjacent
agricultural fields. Remove fertilizer input through conversion
of agricultural field to forested riparian buffer.
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent riparian
Reduce sediment loading
areas to filter runoff from adjacent agricultural fields. Provide
vegetative bank stabilization to decrease sediment input.
Establish a wide riparian corridor with canopy closure to filter
Decrease water temperature
nutrients and provide stream shading, reducing water
and increase dissolved oxygen
temperature and increasing concentration of dissolved
oxygen.
Restore terrestrial habitat
Plant riparian corridor with native vegetation and manage
invasives.
Protect project in perpetuity
Implement and record a conservation easement on the
Parcel.
2.2 Existing Conditions
The Parcel will convert approximately 22.51 acres of agricultural fields — most recently in sweet
potatoes and soybeans — to forested buffers and riparian areas along two unnamed tributaries
(S1 and S2) and one agricultural ditch (D2). Refer to Figure 3 and Appendix A for the Existing
Conditions Map and site photographs collected on July 11, 2023, and July 10, 2024, respectively.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 5
GCO'Grra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
The tree line shown in Figure 3, delineating Preservation areas from Restoration areas was
determined by survey location of canopy and adjusted inward to approximate trunk locations
using recent aerial imagery and subsequent field visits. The tree line will be revised during the As -
Built Survey by locating tree trunks and preservation and riparian areas will be finalized. The site
has been revisited several times during the NOBMP development process and there have been
no changes to land use nor site conditions.
D1 originates from a culvert crossing under NC Highway 55 and is located west of the project
area. It flows through a 42-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert under a farm path, just
outside of the project area and transitions into stream S1 (within the project area). S1, an
intermittent stream, flows northeast until its confluence with S2. S2, an intermittent stream, enters
the project area from a culvert crossing under NC Highway 55 at the southern end of the project
area and flows north past its confluence with S1 and D2 to the project terminus. D2 originates
within the agricultural field in the northwestern region of the project area and flows northeast
until its confluence with S2. D3 is a disconnected ditch that exists within the Parcel to the east of
S2. D3 will remain in place and the western top of bank serves as a boundary that limits the NOC
credit potential for a portion of the riparian area adjacent to S2. Both S1 and S2 are mapped water
features on the 1974 Wayne County Soil Survey; however, only S2 is depicted on the 1997 US
Geological Survey's (USGS) 1:24000 scale Dobbersville, NC 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle
(Figure 4).
The majority of the parcel is composed of agricultural fields, except for mature trees to be
preserved along S2 and D2, as shown on Figure 3. The east and west sides of the project area
border agricultural fields, the north side abuts a forested area, and the south side runs along the
NC Highway 55 right-of-way. Historical aerials denote that land use, including configuration of
the channels, at the project site has been consistent since 1950 (see Appendix B). Between 1999
and 2006 a ditch to the west of S2 was filled between S1 and D2. There are several erosional rills
located within the project area that will be stabilized as part of the riparian restoration (see section
4.1). There is an overhead electric line with a 20-foot utility easement that crosses S1 and S2 within
the southern part of the Parcel. Project attributes associated with the proposed Parcel are outlined
in Table 2.
Table 2: Project Attributes
New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Site
• •• ••
030202011402
Neuse
Neuse 03020201 (excluding Falls Lake Watershed)
• • • •
1-7 -78.192267
Conservation Easement (to be recorded)
Ilype of Credits
Riparian Buffer, Nutrient Offset (Nitrogen)
p
Ial Credits
480,169.348 RBC
19,470.318 NOC
Mitigation Plan Date
November 2023
�& New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Gc7f ep rM HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
6
July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
September 2024
March 2025
April 2025
2025
December 2026
iN16December
December 2027
December 2028
' • •ir
December 2029
2.3 Parcel Viability
DWR staff visited the project Parcel on January 27, 2023, to review features and determine
applicability to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A NCAC 02B .0714.
DWR issued the official Stream Call Determination letter on March 22, 2023. On August 8, 2023,
DWR staff re -visited the site to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset within the proposed easement boundary per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0703,
respectively. DWR issued the official Site Viability letter on October 24, 2023. A copy of both the
"Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset" letters issued by DWR are provided in Appendix C and summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Project Features and Viability
Feature Name
I
S1
Classification
Stream
Riparian Buffer
I Credit Viable
Yes
Nutrient Offset
Viable
Yes
S2
Stream
Yes
Yes
S3'
Stream
Yes
No
D1 z
Ditch
N/A
N/A
D2
Ditch >3'
No
Yes
D33
Ditch
No
No
S3 is located on the adjacent property and outside the limits of the proposed conservation easement
2 D I is outside the limits of the proposed conservation easement
s D3 is identified in the Site Viability letter. It will remain as -is but no credits will be generated beyond the ditch.
2.4 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the Thunder Swamp -Thoroughfare Swamp subwatershed (HUC
030202011402) and Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Watershed). All the
site's water conveyance features drain to S2 which flows to Thoroughfare Swamp. Thoroughfare
Swamp is classified as Class C and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by DWR. Thoroughfare Swamp
is approximately 1,300 linear feet downstream of the project area. Class C waters are protected
for uses which include aquatic life propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity,
wildlife, secondary contact recreation and agriculture. The NSW designation is for waters needing
nutrient management due to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
ecn, erra. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
7
July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Drainage areas were delineated for the project area's streams (S1, S2) and viable ditch feature (D2)
utilizing Wayne County's 2-foot Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data (Figure 5). According
to the 2019 USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD), the drainage area is primarily agricultural
use with limited residential use. Table 4 summarizes the drainage areas and current land use.
Table 4: Drainage Area and Land Use
2.5 Soils and Geology
The project area's soils, as mapped by the 1974 Soil Survey of Wayne County, are loamy sand and
sandy loam, and consist of the Bibb (Bb), Kalmia (Ka) and Norfolk (No) series (see Figure 6). A
description of the site's soils is provided in Table 5. Norfolk soils comprise most of the soils
underlying the Parcel at 87.3%. S1 and S2 are depicted as streams on the Wayne County 1974
USDA Soil Survey map sheet 35 (see Figure 6).
Table 5: Soil Series
Name
Map Unit
SymbolSoil
Poorly drained soil on flood plains. Infiltration is
Bibb sandy loam
Bb
moderate, and surface runoff is slow. Seasonal high-
water table is at the surface.
Kalmia loamy sand, 10 to
Well -drained soil on short sides of divides.
15 percent slopes
KaD
Infiltration is moderate, and surface runoff is rapid.
(Winton)
Seasonal high-water table remains below a depth of
2.5 feet.
Well -drained soil on smooth, broad divides.
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to
Infiltration is moderate and surface runoff is slow.
2 percent slopes
NoA
Seasonal high-water table remains below a depth of
5 feet.
Well -drained soil on smooth sides of divides.
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to
NoB
Infiltration is moderate, and surface runoff is
5 percent slopes
medium. Seasonal high-water table remains below a
depth of 5 feet.
Well -drained soil on short sides of divides.
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to
NoC
Infiltration is moderate, and surface runoff is
10 percent slopes
medium. Seasonal high-water table remains below a
depth of 5 feet.
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
ecn, erra. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
8
July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Geologically, the Parcel is located within the Rolling Coastal Plain of the Middle and Upper Coastal
Plains physiographic province. Broad, flat terraces, adjacent to low -gradient stream channels,
characterize both the Middle and Upper Coastal Plains.
2.6 Vegetation
Vegetative communities within the project area consist of active row crops of sweet potatoes,
soybeans and early successional, herbaceous, and woody vegetation along the streams, ditches
and riparian areas that are mowed and maintained. In some areas, specifically the riparian area
adjacent to S2 and in between D2 and S2, herbaceous vegetation extends approximately 30 to
80-feet from the top of bank to active row crops. These areas will need to be mowed prior to
planting so that equipment can access and mechanically plant the riparian area up to and
including the top of streambank. Existing vegetation includes several facultative (FAC), facultative
wetland (FACW) and facultative upland (FACU) species with some obligate wetland (OBL) and
obligate upland (UPL) species present. Observed species include:
• Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) FAC
• Willow oak (Quercus phellos) FACW
• Water oak (Quercus nigra) FAC
• Post oak (Quercus stellata) UPL
• Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
FACU
• Black cherry (Prunus serotina) FACU
• American basswood (Tilia americana)
FACU
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
• Sugarberry (Celtis laevigata) FACW
• Common elderberry (Sambucus
canadensis) FACW
• Black willow (Salix nigra) OBL
• Red maple (Acer rubrum) FAC
• American holly (Ilex opaca) FAC
• Devil's walkingstick (Aralia spinosa) FAC
• Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) FACU
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database were utilized to identify federally
threatened and endangered species in the project area. In a letter dated October 11, 2022, the
USFWS identified four federally threatened and endangered species under the Endangered
Species Act and one species under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as potentially occurring in the
project vicinity. According to the USFWS, there are no critical habitats within the project area. A
review of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data dated October 12, 2022, did not identify
any known occurrences of federally listed species within one mile of the project site, although it
did make note of three species classified under the North Carolina Status as Significantly Rare.
Significantly Rare designations indicate rarity and the need for population monitoring and
conservative action; However, it is a non -regulatory NCNHP designation.
No eagles or eagle nests were observed, and construction activities will occur outside the window
of the breeding time for local birds. Letters and responses have been included in the Appendix D.
Table 6 summarizes the threatened and endangered species evaluation.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 9
�CO'k rra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 6: Federally Listed SpPr-
Scientific Name
Picoides borealis
Common Name
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Federal Status
.E=
Endangered
Suitable
Habitat
No
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River Waterdog
Threatened
No
Noturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
Endangered
No
Danaus plexippus
Monarch Butterfly
Candidate
No
2.8 Cultural Resources
The NC State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project site. According to the
database, there are no known historical resources within the project site. Three features were
found within a mile of the project site. The Marshall Kornegay House and Cemetery are located
0.56 miles from the project site and are classified as "National Register" sites. Odom Mill
Crossroads is located 0.6 miles from the project site and is classified as a "Surveyed Area, No
designation" site. An unnamed house is located 0.77 miles from the project site. These sites will
not be disturbed for the proposed project. A letter was submitted to SHPO on September 7, 2023,
requesting review and comment and is included in Appendix D. SHPO responded on December
6, 2023, indicating they were not aware of any historic resources that would be affected by the
project. Both letters are included in Appendix D.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain and Permitting Compliance
The Parcel is not located within the 100-year floodplain and will not require FEMA coordination
nor a floodplain development permit. Neither substantial grading activities nor hydraulic
modeling are proposed for this project. Stabilization of the erosional rill west of S2 will be
backfilled with a clay plug, hay bales and fill dirt and stabilized with seeding prior to planting. The
project will not encroach on the NCDOT right-of-way along NC Highway 55 W or the overhead
power line 20-foot easement. There are no other known easements at or near the project site that
would prevent project implementation.
2.10 Parcel Constraints and Access
The Parcel can be accessed via a farm path off NC Highway 55 at the southwestern corner of the
project area for long-term access and site maintenance and monitoring. As shown in Appendix A,
Figure 3 Existing Conditions Map, the only constraint is an electric utility easement running
through the south boundary of the site. This easement will not be disturbed and will be excluded
from the conservation easement boundary. The Parcel is bordered by an NCDOT right-of-way to
the south. The proposed easement is located 10 feet from the right-of-way in order to protect the
Parcel from accidental mowing or other right-of-way maintenance. The Site Viability letter noted
a culvert present along S2 however on -site surveys did not locate this culvert. There are no other
known constraints on the proposed project Parcel.
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
A site assessment was conducted by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to comply with
standards set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) and other environmental due diligence requests to evaluate environmental
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 10
eCO, errC. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
risk for the Parcel. The EDR report, October 12, 2022, determined the site was not located in any
Federal, State or Tribal environmental databases and there were no known, potentially hazardous,
waste sites within or immediately adjacent to the project site. The EDR report is provided in
Appendix E.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument and Long-term
Management
The land required to plant and restore the riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas, access the
conservation easement, and manage the mitigation project includes 22.51 acres of the Parcel
listed in Table 7. The Parcel will be transferred to an approved DWR long-term stewardship entity
prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. It will remain in private ownership,
protected in its entirety by the long-term stewardship entity, and will be managed under the terms
detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement. The long-term trustee and manager will be
responsible for the periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure the conservation easement is
upheld and the land is protected in perpetuity. The Sponsor has selected Southern Conservation
Trust, Inc. (SCT) to assume responsibility as holding the conservation easement and serving as the
long-term steward. Refer to Appendix F for SCT's letter of intent.
Table 7: Landowner and Long-term Protection
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The proposed project will restore riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas along one
agricultural ditch (D2) and two unnamed tributaries (S1 and S2) that flow to Thoroughfare Swamp.
The Parcel will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits by protecting the riparian area from top
of bank to a minimum 50-foot width and maximum 100-foot width along the streams (S1 and S2).
Riparian buffer mitigation credits are also proposed through preservation of a riparian area
adjacent to S1 and, S2 for a minimum 30-foot width and maximum 200-ft width. The parcel will
provide nutrient offset credits by protecting the riparian area from the 100-foot offset from top
of banks along the streams and minimum 50-foot width along the ditch, to a maximum 200-foot
width. The project will not have any adverse impacts to existing stream and water conveyance.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land proposed for riparian restoration is currently in agricultural row crop production,
therefore the site preparation will require minimal soil disturbance. Soil fertility may be assessed
to determine any site soil deficiencies prior to plant establishment. Planting will occur using
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 11
eCO, errC. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
located, photographed, and addressed through minor grading, erosion control matting, seeding
and/or live staking, as necessary, for soil stabilization. Areas of erosional concern have been
identified and are depicted on the Existing Conditions Map (Figure 3). No NC Division of Energy,
Mineral, and Land Resources (DEMLR) nor local County permits are anticipated for stabilizing
compromised areas. An appropriate temporary seed mix will be applied, as necessary, to provide
temporary ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in
areas without existing herbaceous cover.
The Site Viability letter noted a culvert present along S2 however site surveys did not locate the
referenced culvert. S2 will be walked before planting begins and if a culvert is found, it will be
removed and the streambanks will be stabilized with minor grading, erosion control matting,
seeding and live stakes planted as necessary.
4.2 Preservation Activities
There will be no parcel preparation work done in the riparian preservation areas along S1 and S2
as shown in Figure 7 and as defined 15NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5). There is a small area of existing tree
line that is just outside of the 200-foot width from top of S2's bank. As such, it is shown as a no
credit area as it does not meet the width requirements to provide preservation for mitigation
credit. The area of preservation credit within the Parcel shall comprise of no more than 25% of the
total area of buffer mitigation proposed.
4.3 Restoration Activities
The planting plan for the riparian restoration area includes restoring native tree species with bare
root seedlings and seeding to convert the active farming area to a vegetated riparian corridor as
shown in Figure 8. Trees will be planted with a density sufficient to meet the performance
standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and in the UMBI of 260 trees per acre at the
end of five years. Initial planting densities will be approximately 622 trees per acre (10-foot by 7-
foot spacing). All species will be well mixed in bags prior to being planted to ensure adequate
distribution across the planting areas. The Sponsorwill oversee the planting efforts bythe planting
crews to ensure adequate stem placement and diversity, including planting the top of banks. The
Parcel's riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas will be re -vegetated with species consistent
of those identified during the reference survey and additional species suggested by Schafale
(2012) for the Mixed Forest and Coastal Plain. Target community tree species are shown in Table
8, which includes 16 species and ensures that no one tree species will be greater than 50% (as
noted in the aforementioned rule). Species may vary based on nursery availability. If the species
found in Table 8 are not available, a new species list will be submitted for DWR approval. An
appropriate permanent seed mixture will be planted that may include species beneficial to
pollinators or species that act as larval hosts for pollinators such as butterflies (e.g., big bluestem).
Seeding will not be applied to areas with an existing native herbaceous layer. Planting is planned
for winter 2024-2025.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 13
�CC'k rrC. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
mechanical and manual methods. Soil ripping will occur in the mechanically planted rows to break
up plow pans and compacted soils. Additional site preparation such as ripping and discing will
occur within compacted areas, like farm paths proposed for planting.
The Sponsor will be using an integrated pest management approach to deal with invasive species.
This technique falls in line with the site's best management practices and will use a combination
of in field practices to allow for the success of this restoration. The Sponsor will identify the
invasive species and work with a NC agriculture certified applicator with the aquatic certification.
The chemical application (herbicidal spray application) will be used in coordination with
mechanical (bushhogging prior to planting), cultural and biological controls to prevent
adverse impacts to non -target organisms. The Sponsor will be contracting a seed drill to install
the conservation cover and permanent seed thus allowing the native seed bank to regenerate.
Herbicide may be applied during the post -planting phase for at least the first three years as
needed and approved by DWR. The fields within the project area contain a limited number of
invasive plants and herbicide will only be sprayed in areas where there is an existing population
of non-native invasive plant species. These techniques and infield practices will assure the viability
and long-term success of this restoration.
Areas immediately adjacent to the top of banks will be handplanted, not ripped, to prevent soil
erosion and runoff from entering the surface water. Riparian areas, where dense herbaceous
vegetation exists between the top of stream banks and previous row crops, will be mowed and
treated with an herbicidal spray prior to planting so that proposed planting areas can be accessed
with equipment and mechanically planted up to and including the top of bank. No trees will be
removed. Non-native invasive species are present and will be removed during planting to
minimize potential for competition with target vegetative communities.
As noted in the DWR Site Viability Assessment letter, there is an erosional swale, approximately
300-feet in length, that needs to be stabilized adjacent to S2. Within the proposed conservation
easement, the swale will be backfilled with a clay plug at the upstream extent, intermittent hay
bale check -dams and fill dirt. The clay plug will be rip -rap lined on the upstream face to diffuse
flow entering the proposed easement. The clay plug and stone used to line the clay plug will be
placed outside of the NOC credit area within the 20-foot wide space between the easement
boundary and the credit area. Within the credit area, the swale will be backfilled with soil and hay
bale check -dams to be secured with wooden stakes and plugged with soil and bare root seedlings.
The fill dirt will be stabilized with temporary and permanent seeding prior to planting with bare
root seedlings. Erosion control matting may be utilized if warranted. Silt fence will be installed
along the conservation easement boundary where the swale and other erosional rills enter the
easement to prevent sediment deposition from overland flow and protect seeded areas. Silt fence
will be removed once vegetation is established and erosion stabilized.
Planting rows will be approximately aligned to follow the existing contours to impede overland
flow and prevent erosion. Sediment and erosion control measures, including silt fence and
matting, may be utilized, if necessary, in all areas with existing rills and unstable banks, as well as
areas prone to erosion, to prevent stormwater runoff from entering surface waters during
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 12
LCO'Grrc. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 8a: Proposed Planting Plan
Scientific Name
Betula nigra
Common Name
IL
River Birch
Tree/
Shrub
Tree
Forest
Strata
Canopy
Approximate
Percentage
10%
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
Tree
Canopy
5%
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
Tree
Subcanopy
5%
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree
Subcanopy
10%
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
Canopy
5%
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree
Canopy
5%
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree
Subcanopy
5%
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum Tupelo
Tree
Canopy
5%
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
Canopy
10%
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
Canopy
10%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Quercus shumardi
Shumard Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Quercus texana
Nuttall Oak
Tree
Canopy
5%
Table 8b: Proposed Planting Plan — Ground Cover
Scientific Name
Andropogon gerardi
Common Name PWI
Big bluestem
Planting
Zone
Permanent Seed Mix
Echinacea purpurea
Eastern purple coneflower
Permanent Seed Mix
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
Permanent Seed Mix
Rudbeckia hirta
Black-eyed Susan
Permanent Seed Mix
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
Permanent Seed Mix
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
Permanent Seed Mix
Symphyotrichum cordifolium
Common blue wood aster
Permanent Seed Mix
4.4 DWR As -Built Evaluation
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer and nutrient offset areas,
the Sponsor will submit written notification to DWR documenting that all buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset activities have been completed. Completed activities include:
• Plantings have been installed
• Easement boundaries are adequately marked
• Sediment and erosion control measures are in place to stabilize rills
• Bank stabilization measures are installed
• Vegetation plots are installed for monitoring
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 14
eCO, errC. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
• Culvert maintenance and/or removal has been completed (if applicable)
Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may result in a modified credit release
schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases. An as -built report will be submitted to DWR,
following the restoration planting, to document the mitigation work plan to date.
5.0 Maintenance and Monitoring Plan
The maintenance and monitoring plan has been developed to demonstrate required performance
standards and success criteria are met and project goals and objectives are achieved.
5.1 Performance Standards
The performance standards for the proposed project follow approved criteria presented in the
Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295). Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will
be conducted to assess the condition of the finished project. Performance standards will be
evaluated throughout the five-year post -construction monitoring period and summarized
annually in a monitoring report. This annual report shall provide project data and chronicle issues
that arise during the five-year monitoring period. The Sponsor shall submit annual monitoring
reports to DWR by December 31 st of each year for at least 5 consecutive years until project close-
out and will follow the terms and conditions of the Neuse 01 UMBI.
5.2 Monitoring
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be established and assessed within the riparian buffer
and adjacent riparian areas to document the survival and vigor of the planted trees. A total of 16
plots that are 10 meters (m) by 10 m each will be randomly established within the planted
restoration areas to document tree survival (Figure 8). The number of plots represent 2% of the
total planted area for credit and is calculated as follows:
2% x 849,506 sqft = 16,990 sgft = 1,578 square meters
1,578 square meters - 10-m x 10-m plot = 16 plots
The Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) and corresponding UMBI require survival of at
least 260 stems per acre at the end of the five-year monitoring period. Measures will be taken to
ensure that the site is diverse, where a minimum of four native hardwood tree species are
represented throughout the site and that no one species represents more than 50% of the plot.
Vegetation monitoring will follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) — NC Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).
The vegetation plots will be photographed each year with an additional seven photographs (23
total) taken to document project conditions and easement integrity. The photo -stations will be
permanently established and photos will be taken at the same location and orientation each year.
At least one of the additional seven photographs will be taken of the stabilized swale to document
its stability in the annual monitoring reports. Plots will be demarcated with durable PVC or metal
markers and flagging during the monitoring period.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 15
�CO'k rrQ.. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Visual assessments will be performed twice a year during the five-year monitoring period. Areas
of concern, low stem density, invasive species, or easement encroachment, will be mapped,
photographed, and described in the monitoring report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during
subsequent site visits. Table 9 summarizes the proposed monitoring plan components associated
with this project.
QuantityF-IW16%0 Reach
Vegetation
CVS Level I/Photos
All 16 Years 1, 3, 5
Reference Stations
Photo Points
All 7 Annual
Visual Assessments
Visual Assessment/Photos
All As needed Semi-annual
The first growing period will be documented in the first annual report to be completed at least
five months after planting has occurred and no earlier than the fall season. Quantitative data for
species composition (and planting date) shall be collected and reported for all five consecutive
years of monitoring. Specifically, plot data for years 1, 3 and 5, will include individual stem heights
along with the average vigor evaluated per plot. Upon DWR approval, desirable native volunteer
species may be included in the overall tree density for the Parcel to meet performance standards
and success criteria.
5.3 Parcel Maintenance
Actions will be taken to correct issues identified in the annual monitoring reports that jeopardize
the success of the project such as tree survival and easement encroachment. Parcel maintenance
activities will be included in annual reports. As noted in the Parcel Preparation section, effective
herbicide application is critical to success of restoration areas, primarily historical agricultural land.
Herbicides approved for aquatic environments will be applied as necessary and in accordance with
the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA) rules and regulations by a
qualified NC licensed pesticide/herbicide applicator. Prior approval from DWR is required if
mowing within Zones 1 and 2 of the Neuse River basin buffers is deemed necessary.
5.4 Parcel Easement Boundary Maintenance
Conservation easement boundaries will be clearly marked with fencing, posts, or other permanent
material and will include appropriate contact information on the boundaries. Boundary markers
and flagging will be installed more frequently along the utility easement boundary to clearly
demarcate the credit area from the utility easement. Established boundaries between the
easement and the remaining parcel in agriculture will ensure project protection and prevent
encroachment. Boundary installation will occur immediately after planting is completed and prior
to the as -built survey and the Task 2 Milestone of the Credit Release Schedule/DWR site walk
according to the UMBI. Boundary markers incidentally destroyed, damaged or disturbed will be
repaired and/or replaced as needed during the monitoring period and in the future under the
long-term trustee management. All easement boundaries will be visually assessed twice per year
as part of the monitoring protocol. Any easement encroachment or performed maintenance will
be documented in the annual monitoring reports. If any encroachments are observed within the
conservation easement, the Sponsor will notify DWR promptly, take corrective measures, provide
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 16
�CO'k rra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
written notification to the landowner (or third party) and include all information in the monitoring
report.
6.0 Financial Assurances
6.1 Performance and Maintenance Bonds
Following approval of the NOBMP, the Sponsor shall provide a Performance Bond from a surety
that is rated no less than an "A-" by A.M. Best. The performance bond amount shall be 100% of
the estimated cost for implementation of the project, but not less than $150,000 to comply with
the UMBI. In lieu of posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project
prior to the first credit release. Under the latter option, a performance bond is not necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will
be secured for 100% of the estimated cost, but not less than $100,000 initially to comply with the
UMBI. Upon DWR approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete
the monitoring. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the
next year's monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report (when applicable). DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule
if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals. Refer to Appendix F for SCT's
estimate for long-term endowment.
7.0 Determination of Credits and Credit Release
7.1 Credit Potential
The potential project credits are based on the top of bank of the two unnamed tributaries (S1,
and S2) and agricultural ditch (D2). All areas within 200-linear feet landward of the top of bank
will be planted and accounted as either riparian buffer credit or nutrient offset credit with the
exception of the area to the east of D3's western top of bank. Non-credit areas that are within the
easement but lie outside of the 200-foot width from top of bank are depicted on Figure 7. The
entire conservation easement boundary will be planted except for the preservation areas, area to
the east and immediately north of D3, and the small non-credit area adjacent to D2. Refer to
Figures 7 and 8 for a depiction of the proposed riparian buffer and nutrient offset credit areas and
planted area for the Parcel. Riparian restoration adjacent to the streams is primarily intended to
be used to generate RBC out to 100 feet and to generate NOC beyond 100 feet in width to a
maximum of 200 feet. RBC generated from preservation areas are capped at 25% of the total area
of buffer mitigation. The preservation area for the proposed Parcel represents 8.1 % of total buffer
mitigation area. Riparian restoration adjacent to the ditches will be used to generate NOC because
they are not viable to generate RBC. Credits that could be converted from RBC to NOC if still
available are depicted in Table 10. Any credit conversion requests must be submitted to DWR in
writing and receive written approval from DWR prior to debiting or crediting credits from the
Parcel's credit ledgers. It should be noted the final project area will be delineated and depicted in
the As -Built Survey and submitted with the As -Built Report. Therefore, credit totals may change
slightly depending on the As -Built Survey. The project's credit potential is summarized in the
Project Credit Table (Table 10).
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 17
�CO'k rrQ.. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
In accordance with the UMBI, any credit conversions will be calculated using the guidance
provided in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits letter issued by the DWR.
7.2 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by
DWR, the riparian buffer and nutrient credits associated with the New Farm Nutrient Offset &
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as described in the approved UMBI.
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 18
�CO'k rrQ.. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 10: Project Credits Table — New Farm Bank Parcel
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft'/Pound�
P Credit Conversion Ratio Jf12/pound)
�pherneral or
dit,h 'I
Feature Name
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft I
Ratio f.: If
convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Nutrient Offset
Delive.re
Nutrien t set:
Its)
Nutrient
Offset: P (lbs)
To
Total tals Buffer
Total Nutrient r
Total Ephemeral Area )ft') for Credit
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft)
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (h')
CredkType Wcation Subject? I Feature Type Mitigation Activity Width (III
ff) Min -Mar Buffer Feature Name
Preservation Area Subtotals
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
476,37R
476,379 000
Enhancement:
a
0.000
Preservation:
51,485
3,791,348
Total Riparian Buffer:
527,863
480,169-34R
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
I Square FeetLV
Nutrient Offset:
Nitro en:
373 128
Phos horus.
o
a
131,966
0.0%
158,793
B.1%
Total Area Of)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
M itigatlon {ft' )
31,229
3L,22�
20,256
20,256
51,485
51,485
.phemeral Reaches as %TABM
'reservation as %TABM
Initial Credit
Ratio {aa}
%Full [redlt
Final Credit
Ratio (a:l)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
10
100%
10.00000
3,122,900
10
33%
30.30303
668.448
At,M New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 19
eCO, err(] HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
8.0 References
15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers. 2015.
15A NCAC 02B .0703 Nutrient Offset Credit Trading. 2020.
15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy:
Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers. 2020
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Available at: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services. 2018. Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. N.C. State Historic Preservation
Office. [web mapping application]. Available at:
https://nc.maps.arcciis.com/home/group.html?id=d56ec9c8aa77423b93l f4d359f103ae6&view=l
ist&categories=%5B%22%2FCategories%2FHPOWEB%22%5D#content. (Accessed October
2022)
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number
3720254300K. 2018.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2022. Natural Heritage Data Explorer [web
application]. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC. Available at: https:Hncnhde.natureserve.orci (Accessed
October 2022)
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth. North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR. Raleigh, North Carolina.
217 pp.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1974. Soil
Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2019. Web
Soil Survey [web mapping application]. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/ap-W.
(Accessed October 2022)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Wayne County, NC. Available at:
,' New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 20
GCO'Grra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.ciov/?state=wC6sc65YLNAOFQvWg2MR5NmErSVrwH (Accessed
October 2022)
United State Department of Interior. United States Geological Survey. Grantham, NC Quadrangle
Topographical Map. Scale 1:24000. 1997.
Wayne County Tax Department. Online Geographic Information System Maps. Available at:
https://wayne.connectciis.com/Map.aspx. (Accessed October 2022)
�W New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan 21
ecn, erra. HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

Eco Terra I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
FIGURES
VICINITY MAP
CREDIT SERVICE AREA MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DRAINAGE AREA MAP
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
RIPARIAN MITIGATION PLAN
PLANTING PLAN & MONITORING MAP
New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
eCOterm HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

W
70
169 ft
Legend
O Proposed Conservation Easement
Goldsboro
Project Site � /� �
C Highway 55 W
N
A
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Prepared For: NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn 1 AMR FIGURE
`� RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date: 11/1/17/2023
VICINITY MAP Project No.: ECT22003 i1
MCADAMS eco,1errc. Neuse 03020201 excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1
Wayne County, North Carolina

`/
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
501
IN
North
Carolina
Sanford
Falls
Durham Reservoir
ry a 543fY
39
1 64
Haliwa-Sad
276 ftI
M
401 r
87
95
13
�
5__ � Coharie SDTSA
Little Rivet
N Project Site
Legend
O 8-Digit HUC 03020201
= Proposed Conservation Easement 0 5.5 11 22
cv
® RBC & NOC Service Area - Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
files
Prepared For: NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn `1 AMR FIGURE � RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date: 11/1/17/2023
CREDIT SERVICE AREA MAP Project No.: ECT22003
MCADAMS ecolerrc. Neuse 03020201 excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 inch = 11 miles
Wayne County, North Carolina

-/
Hf�J,ti 1
ri
0$
s
~� O
Swale To be Stabilized for Diffuse Flow
O
i
0
O
O
S1 Start 5� O
O
O
01
Existing 42" RCP Culvert
Legend
Proposed Conservation Easement
Stream Centerline
- Ditch Centerline
= Existing Pipe
O Electric Utility Line Easement (Non -Credit Area)
NC DOT ROW
O Erosional Rills
0 Erosional Swale
Existing Tree Line
Dense Herbaceous Vegetation
N
In
Electric Utility Line Easement
11
NC HIGHWAY 55 W
S2 Start
IF
', Prepared For: NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn 3 FIGURE
`� RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:07/7/30/20/2024
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Project No.: ECT22003
MCADAMS eco,1errc. Neuse 03020201 excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 inch = 40o feet
Wayne County, North Carolina

n
z
_
—'1
a
3
O
'
O
p
_ J. J. J< J.'• hfar¢ySwamp
vain
p
L J. _
- _
il
--
y
A. .Lk .J. Jc .I. 14.
J< .4 16. .1.. .1. .1.. 14 .
a4 1 1 J. 1
QQ-
1 .I.. +4 �:�t • =. _ Jo- J. Jr .6 J
wAV
J.
L' 4.�.i..SAM SONC�VNTY O
J. Al A,
-
.4 �.. +L 4 1 Jc .L. .4 1 .r .^u z.L ^•,1. .4 Jc .,.
1
J<
a4. ... Ja -A Ja 1 1
l
J.. AF aL J
J.- J1
yILI
0 r< .4 C•Oe,R`Ti t 1
p1F
O ?'
r
0
nN
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
'� Prepared For: NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn 3 FIGURE
`y� RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:07/7/30/20/2024
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Project No.: ECT22003 A
MCADAMS ecolerrc. Neuse 03020201 excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 feet �F
Wayne County, North Carolina

sEl -
We
JS
i
4CD) =�
-� Ira,
f,t6-
1 �
Will
Po
•� QG
Legend-
O Proposed Conservation Easement - rh
r
NRCS 1974 Wayne County
o zso soo i,000
Soil Survey Map Sheet 35
Feet
r�
Prepared For: NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn 3 FIGURE
`�� RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:07/7/30/20/2024
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP Project No.: = 500f et C
WADAMs ecolerra. Neuse 03020201 excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 inch = 50o feet V
Wayne County, North Carolina

A
Legend
O Proposed Conservation Easement
• • Stream Centerline
• • Ditch Centerline
1111111110 Riparian Preservation for RBC (0-100)
� Riparian Preservation for RBC (101-200)
� Riparian Restoration for RBC (0-100)
O Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200)
0 Ditch Riparian Restoration for NOC (0-100)
m Ditch Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200)
C7 Electric Utility Line Easement (Non -Credit Area)
30' from Top of Bank
'0' from Top of Bank
O 100' from Top of Bank
O 200' from Top of Bank
Photo Points
= Vegetation Plots
Planted Area
M Existing Pipe
NC DOT ROW
Prepared For:
`04
ecolrra
McADAMs
D2 Origin
PP5
PP2
S1 Start
©r
"•
PP1
S2 Start
Boundary Markers and Flagging to be
Installed more Frequently along Electric
Utility Line Easement to Demarcate Credit
Area from Utility Easement
NEW FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET &
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
PLANTING PLAN & MONITORING MAP
Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Lake
Wayne County, North Carolina
Drawn By: KAB FIGURE
Date: 07/30/2024
Project No.: ECT22003 Q
Scale:1 inch = 400 feet Q

Eco Terr- I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
%V New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
eCOlCrra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
July 2024

Ditch D1 — Looking Upstream/Southwest (07-11-23) Ditch D1 — Looking Downstream/Northeast (07-11-23)
S1 — Looking Upstream/Southwest (07-11-23) S1 — Looking Upstream/Southeast (07-11-23)
S2/D2 Confluence — Looking Downstream/Northwest (07-11-23) S2/D2 Confluence —Looking Upstream/Southeast, (07-11-23)

D2 — Looking Downstream/North, (07-11-23) D2 — Looking Upstream/Northwest (07-11-23)
FS2 Utility Easement Crossing — Looking Northeast (07-11-23) S2 — Looking Downstream/North (07-11-23)
Existing swale to be stabilized, confluence with S2 (07-11-23) F
Existing swale to be stabilized (07-11-23)

t1 5.21811, .78.19362 Aft11tt 182 V_ 12sw
i 0-ISS
Qt1sh
35.21818,-76.19332�fti�n18rj'/; 12NE42

QWQ504 1t '.T WG504 1t ° T
<_1"'356ft.21780,-78.19164�_11,204 t12N11 vt16h35.21883,-78.19165� 11ft187'! _`12NE;
start New Farm
--3185 NC-55, Mount Oiive NC 28365, US 0 10-JUI-24 11:41
0 """35.21919, v78„19164 jA11ft ft 1 90 ',T
t45ft t1'e
IONIC r -
-
0
.,F f..
w
S2 New Farm
Mount Olive NC 28365, United States o 10-Jul-24 11:39:03
2� A
ew farm'
Olive NC 28365, United States d 10-Jul-24 11:39:51
A I
New Farm
a4nt,Olive NC 28365. United States - 10-Jul-24 11:21 :29

QWysft35.22242,-78,19328�ft��n171 - 121\
�""35.22031,-78.19243Aft,1ft182mt 4
7`
r s�
New Farm
nt Olive NC 28365, United States o 10-Jul-24 11:20:45
Q t16ft 35.22033,-78.19237 Aft, 7ft 1 76 m t 4
IM
' w�Z !�
4 -
T.
7
Erosionaf Rill New Far
Mount Olive NC 28365, Unit-IState
ul-24 11:09:20
a „ e
3
- k
ional Rill New Farm
[ Olive NC 28365, United States o 11
22033' ' 78'19240 R 1ft11ft17& E72
i
IM
t S
y
,u
ft,
..
Dnal Rill New Farm
Olive NC 28365, United States o 10-Jul-24 11:09:30

Eco Terr- I New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX 6
HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
%V New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
eCOlCrra HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
July 2024

Mcclenny Site
Not Reported
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Inquiry Number: 7145794.5
October 17, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDR� Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 10/17/22
Site Name: Client Name:
Mcclenny Site
Not Reported
Mount Olive, NC 28365
EDR Inquiry # 7145794.5
John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Contact: Kerry Bray
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year
Scale
Details
Source
2016
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1999
1"=500'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1999
USGS/DOQQ
1993
1"=500'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1983
1"=500'
Flight Date: March 02, 1983
NHAP
1973
1 "=500'
Flight Date: February 24, 1973
USGS
1964
1 "=500'
Flight Date: April 01, 1964
USGS
1961
1 "=500'
Flight Date: July 30, 1961
USGS
1959
1 "=500'
Flight Date: March 04, 1959
USDA
1950
1 "=500'
Flight Date: November 21, 1950
USGS
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
7145794 - 5 page 2

Whom -Nq
INQUIRY #: 7145794.5
YEAR: 2016 N��Jr
= 500' (rEDR"

elk;Aiv oln�..

-;, m

x
INQUIRY #: 7145794.5 /�
YEAR: 2006 1
= 500' (rEDR`

f
woo
low
I

f

T !

7145794.5
1961
= 500'
7145794.5
1959
= 500'
7145794.5
1950
= 500'
Eco Terra | New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site

New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

APPENDIX C

DWR APPLICABILITY TO THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN BUFFER RULES LETTER DWR SITE VIABILITY FOR BUFFER MITIGATION OFFSET LETTER
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1611 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000
October 24, 2023
Eco Terra, LLC. DWR ID: 2023-0137
Attn: Jordan Burbage
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation – New Farm Site
Near 35.220386, -78.192267 near 3000 NC Hwy 55, Mount Olive, NC
Neuse 03020201, not in Falls Watershed
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Burbage,
On March 24, 2023, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Eco Terra, LLC (Eco Terra) for a site visit near the above-referenced site in
the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site visit was to
determine the potential for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation within a proposed conservation
easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached maps labeled “Existing
Conditions Map” (Figure 3) prepared by Eco Terra and edited by DWR. DWR also included a
Figure 2 to depict additional site characteristics described in the table below. The proposed easement
boundaries on Figure 1 include all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of the mitigation
site. On August 8, 2023, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with Eco
Terra were also present.
Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and for
nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703 using 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to define the
mitigation type determinations.
DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
New Farm Site
Eco Terra
October 24, 2023

Page 2 of 4
Feature Classification
onsite Subject
to
Buffer
Rule1
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
Nutrient
Offset
Viable3

Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas 4,5,8
D1 Ditch No Not located within
proposed conservation
easement
N/A N/A N/A

S1

Stream

Yes

Non forested agricultural
fields. Partially located
within DOT R.O.W

Electric utility line bisects
S1
Yes

Yes (non-
forested ag
fields only)

Non-forested ag. Fields - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or within Electric Utility line

S2 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with thick
herbaceous weeds and
invasives within Zone 1 of
the neuse buffer. Wider
forested fringes present
and mature forests
downstream (see map).
Partially located within
DOT R.O.W

Severe active erosional
rills and depressions
within riparian zone were
observed.

Any culverts along the
stream should be removed.

Electric utility line bisects
S2
Yes2 Yes (non-
forested ag
fields only)

Non-forested ag. Fields - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested fringes and forested areas –
Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Minor bank/riparian stabilization efforts
and grading needed where bank stability
is compromised and where erosional
rills, sink holes and gullies within the
riparian areas are observed contributing
sediment to S1.

Site constraints consist of an Electric
Utility line and one culvert that should be
removed but did not appear to be
impeding in-stream flow or aquatic
passage.

No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or within Electric Utility Line

S3 Stream Yes Mature forest Yes2

No Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
D2 Ditch >3’
depth
No Mostly non forested
agricultural fields with
some forested areas
present. thick herbaceous
weeds and invasives (see
Figure 3)
No Yes (non-
forested ag
fields only)

Non-forested ag. fields - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested non-ag areas – no credit

DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
New Farm Site Eco Terra
October 24, 2023
Page 3 of 4
1Subjectivity calls and stream origins for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 22, 2023 (DWR# 2023-
0137) using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey
map prepared by the NRCS.
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
8The confluence of a ditch to a stream is required to be secured with a conservation easement to preserve the hydrologic connectivity of
ditches to streams to be viable to generate buffer and/or nutrient offset credits
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas and features shown on Figure 3 as well as Figure 2 prepared by DWR.
The figures representing the proposal for the site are attached to this letter and initialed by Ms.
Merritt on October 23, 2023. Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as any
site constraints identified in this letter that are not addressed in a riparian restoration plan, could
affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on October 24, 2025 or upon the submittal of a complete
mitigation plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any
nutrient offset, buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Feature Classification
onsite Subject
to
Buffer
Rule1
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
Nutrient
Offset
Viable3
Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas 4,5,8
D3 Ditch No N/A No No Ditch needs to be removed: filled, graded
and planted. If not filled, graded and
planted, no credits can be generated
beyond the ditch (see Figure 2)
DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
New Farm Site Eco Terra
October 24, 2023
Page 4 of 4
Please contact Katie Merritt at [e-mail] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Goss, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: Figure 2, Figure 3
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
DocuSign Envelope ID: F72B7D40-BEFA-4E3A-ADA9-D6F4EF2EA66B
Eco Terra | New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site

New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

APPENDIX D

USFWS LIST OF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES LETTER NCNHP NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES LETTER REQUEST FOR CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW TO SHPO SHPO CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW LETTER
October 11, 2022
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0003303
Project Name: McClenny Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area 
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species.  If suitable habitat is present, surveys 
should be conducted to determine the species’ presence or absence within the project area.  The 
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.  
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
10/11/2022   2

species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.
10/11/2022   3

▪
▪
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
Migratory Birds
10/11/2022   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
10/11/2022   2

Project Summary
Project Code:2023-0003303
Project Name:McClenny Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Project Type:Mitigation Development/Review - Mitigation or Conservation Bank
Project Description:riparian buffer mitigation
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.2207851,-78.19212267897632,14z
Counties:Wayne County, North Carolina
10/11/2022   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Endangered
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
1
10/11/2022   4

Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
10/11/2022   1

1.
2.
3.
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
1
2
10/11/2022   2

1.
2.
3.
 no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
10/11/2022   3

▪
▪
▪
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
10/11/2022   4

1.
2.
3.
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
"Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
10/11/2022   5

Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
10/11/2022   6

IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:McAdams
Name:Kerry Bray
Address:621 Hillsborough St
Address Line 2:Suite 500
City:Raleigh
State:NC
Zip:27603
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]
NCNHDE-19616
October 12, 2022
Kerry Bray
McAdams
621 Hillsborough St
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: McClenny Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Kerry Bray:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
McClenny Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
October 12, 2022
NCNHDE-19616
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33771 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S1?
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33781 Stylurus ivae Shining Clubtail 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G4 S1?
Freshwater
Bivalve
39292 Elliptio fisheriana Northern Lance 2020-10-08 E 3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G4 S3
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on October 12, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q2, July 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
117 Centrewest Ct, Cary, NC 27513 | EcoTerra.com
September 7, 2023
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Cultural Resource Environmental Review
New Farm Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
Eco Terra is requesting consultation with respect to a nutrient offset and riparian buffer
restoration site and the project's impact (if any) on archaeological or cultural resources.
The project information is summarized below.
Project Name: New Farm Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Project Location: Hwy 55, Grantham NC
Wayne County
35°13'13.39"N 78°11'32.16"W
Project Contact: Jordan Burbage
Eco Terra, LLC
117 Centrewest Court
Cary, NC 27513
919.922.9508
[e-mail]
Project Description:
The New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Parcel or project area)
is located near Mount Olive, NC, in the Thunder Swamp-Thoroughfare Swamp
watershed of the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201). The proposed project will provide
riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the Neuse River Basin. The project
involves the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along three unnamed
tributaries and one ditch that flow to Thoroughfare Swamp. Land disturbing activities
include site preparation for planting trees to enhance the vegetative buffer up to 200
feet from the streams and ditches within the approximate 26.48-acre Parcel. The project

117 Centrewest Ct, Cary, NC 27513 | EcoTerra.com

area and surrounding areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops.
Historical land use has been agriculture for the past 70 years according to historical
USDA aerials. The Parcel will be permanently protected and preserved with a
conservation easement that will ultimately be transferred to a land trust for long-term
stewardship.

The NC State Historic Preservation Office's online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project area.
According to the database, there are no known historical resources within the Parcel.
Three features were found within a mile of the project area. The Marshall Kornegay
House and Cemetery (SP0530) are located 0.56 miles from the Parcel and are classified
as “National Register” sites. Odom Mill Crossroads (WY0653) is located 0.61 miles from
the project area and is classified as a “Surveyed Area, No designation” site. An unnamed
house (WY0652) is located 0.77 miles from the Parcel. These sites will not be disturbed
for the proposed project and are classified as “Surveyed Only” areas.

Project Area Map: See attached Figures 1 and 2

Site Photographs: See attached

We are requesting that you review the project area to determine if any historic
resources are present within the proposed conservation easement as shown in the
attached Figures 1 and 2. If you should have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].

Sincerely,

Jordan Burbage

117 Centrewest Ct, Cary, NC 27513 | EcoTerra.com

Stream 1 (S1)
Stream 2 (S2)

117 Centrewest Ct, Cary, NC 27513 | EcoTerra.com

Stream 2 (S2)
Ditch 2 (D2)

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.

Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

December 6, 2023

Mason Hancock [e-mail]
McAdams
621 Hillsborough Street, Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27603

Re: New Farm Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site, Highway 55, Grantham, Wayne County, ER 23-2529

Dear Mr. Hancock:

Thank you for your letter of November 7, 2023, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.

We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.

Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

Eco Terra | New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site

New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

APPENDIX E

EDR REPORT
FORM-LBD-MGA
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Mcclenny Site
Not Reported
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Inquiry Number: 7145794.2s
October 12, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist
from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES,
AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,
COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT,
MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates,
ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property.
Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the
environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any
report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC7145794.2s Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
NOT REPORTED
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
COORDINATES
35.2203490 - 35ˆ 13’ 13.25’’Latitude (North):
78.1927900 - 78ˆ 11’ 34.04’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
755514.4UTM X (Meters):
3900892.8UTM Y (Meters):
162 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
13847209 DOBBERSVILLE, NCTarget Property Map:
2019Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20141018Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
7145794.2s Page 2
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
NOT REPORTED
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7145794.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0160
16 01
6
0
16 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1
6
0
1 6 0 16 0
1
160
160
1 6 0
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1
6
0
1
16
0
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
TC7145794.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPFAS
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
TC7145794.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAOP
TC7145794.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSEPT HAULERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMINES MRDS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC7145794.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NO SITES FOUND
TC7145794.2s Page 8
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
Count: 0 records.
NO SITES FOUND
TC7145794.2s Page 9
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC7145794.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7145794.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/16/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/16/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/16/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site’s responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 06/13/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7145794.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/07/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/11/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7145794.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC7145794.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC7145794.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/19/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 9
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 08/11/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7145794.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 07/18/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC7145794.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7145794.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 06/10/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC7145794.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 08/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/03/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 06/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 08/11/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 12
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 07/05/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7145794.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2023
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC7145794.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
TC7145794.2s Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7145794.2s Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC7145794.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2019Version Date:
13847209 DOBBERSVILLE, NCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
162 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3900892.8UTM Y (Meters):
755514.4UTM X (Meters):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
78.19279 - 78ˆ 11’ 34.04’’Longitude (West):
35.220349 - 35ˆ 13’ 13.26’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
NOT REPORTED
MCCLENNY SITE
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC7145794.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 162 ft.
North South
West East
16
4
16
9
17
1
17
2
16
9
17
3
17
1
16
9
16
2
16
2
15
1
14
1
15
2
12
7
13
4
14
2
15
4
15
9
16
4
17
1
17
0
16
9
16
9
16
8
16
7
16
8
16
4
16
7
16
2
16
4
16
6
16
4
16
6
16
6
16
6
17
0
17
1
16
6
General NorthGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7145794.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapDOBBERSVILLE
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720253300K
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720254400J
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720253400J
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720254300J
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7145794.2s Page A-4

> 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max:
> 60 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
MODERATECorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
water table is more than 6 feet.
Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth toSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
loamy sandSoil Surface Texture:
NORFOLK Soil Component Name:
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Stratified SequenceCategory:MesozoicEra:
CretaceousSystem:
Washita GroupSeries:
lK3Code: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7145794.2s Page A-5
sandy clay
stratified
sandy clay loamDeeper Soil Types:
clay loam
sandy clay loam
fine sandy loamShallow Soil Types:
mucky - loam
loam
sandy loamSurficial Soil Types:
mucky - loam
loam
sandy loamSoil Surface Textures:
appear within the general area of target property.
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00Not reportedNot reportedvariable99 inches70 inches 4
Min: 3.60
Max: 5.50
Min: 0.60
Max: 2.00
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam70 inches38 inches 3
Min: 3.60
Max: 5.50
Min: 0.60
Max: 2.00
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy loam38 inches14 inches 2
Min: 3.60
Max: 6.00
Min: 6.00
Max: 20.00
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularloamy sand14 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Permeability
Rate (in/hr)
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7145794.2s Page A-6
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1/2 - 1 Mile NNWUSGS40000885613 1
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
NC
TC7145794.2s Page A-8
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 30Feet below surface:
1952-12-16Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units:
106Well Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Black Creek AquiferFormation Type:
Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer systemAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
03020201HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: WA-089Monitor Location:
USGS North Carolina Water Science CenterOrganization Name:
USGS-NCOrganization ID:
1
NNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40000885613FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7145794.2s Page A-9
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%0%100%0.300 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 2
Federal Area Radon Information for WAYNE COUNTY, NC
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAYNE County: 3
0.30.30.301
__________________________________
Max pCi/LMin pCi/LAvg pCi/LNum Results
Radon Test Results
State Database: NC Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC7145794.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC7145794.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7145794.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
Eco Terra | New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site

New Farm Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed July 2024

APPENDIX F

SOUTHERN CONSERVATION TRUST, INC. LETTER OF INTENT SOUTHERN CONSERVATION TRUST, INC. ESTIMATE FOR LONG-TERM ENDOWMENT
Mr. Burbage,
It is the Southern Conservation Trust’s intent to serve as holder of a permanentconservation easement on approximately 24.6 acres in Wayne County, NorthCarolina as part of the New Farm Mitigation Project (for Nutrient Offset andRiparian Buffer Mitigation) that you, Eco Terra, sponsor. We understand that youare in the submittal phase of the mitigation plan for this project. We plan to workwith you as the project moves forward and are ready to assume responsibility forholding the easement as soon as it is ready to be recorded.
We are also agreeable to and intend to serve as the long-term manager uponproject closeout. We estimate we will need approximately $26,900 as a long-termendowment for the responsibilities you have summarized to date, includingboundary inspection, easement enforcement, and signage repair. Please don'thesitate to reach out for discussion if adjustments need to be made to meet newmitigation plan or third party requirements.
Our 501(c)(3) nonprofit land trust is a qualified easement holder and committedto elevating nature through exceptional stewardship. We hold conservationeasements and own and manage fee simple property throughout the state ofNorth Carolina, including in the direct vicinity of this site. We are prepared andwell-equipped to carry out the long term management responsibilities detailedin the plan you have proposed.
We look forward to working with you, the North Carolina Division of WaterResources, and landowner partners on this important mitigation project in theNeuse River Basin HUC-8 03020201.
Please reach out to us at the contact information below for questions orclarification.
November 20, 2023Eco Terra, LLCAttn: Jordan Burbage117 Centrewest Ct,Cary, NC 27513 Delivered electronically: [e-mail]
Re: New Farm Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project NC DWR Project # 2023-0137
Regards,
Jesse Woodsmith
W: WWW.SCTLANDTRUST.ORG
DIRECTOR OF CONSERVATION & STEWARDSHIP
SOUTHERN CONSERVATION TRUST
E: [e-mail]
P: 770-486-7774 EXT. 2 - CONSERVATION
Southern Conservation Trust, Inc.
305 Beauregard Blvd
Fayetteville, Georgia 30214
Requested by SCT: $26,900
A. Estimations
Travel Expenses
Miles from office to property (one-way) 5.0 In this case miles from closest existing SCT
easement in Wayne County, NC, <5 miles and 7 min
away. (SCT owned property within 2 hrs (free
lodging).)
Average travel time in hours to property (one-way) 0.1 Time from nearest CE (lower since this will be
monitored with other properties in the area)
Reimbursement per mile $0.650 The IRS issues standard mileage rates based on the
Other reimbursable travel expenses (e.g., tolls, parking,
meals, lodging)
$180.00 1 meal & Hotel (Overestimate, budgeting for needing
to stay at a hotel in area. Reality is lower since this will
be monitored with other properties in the area and is
<2 hours from SCT lodging at owned property in
Pinehurst, NC.)
Annual Monitoring Expenses For monitoring, calculate based on Stewardship
Coordinator (Staff #2) lead. This was previously
entered backwards, with Cons/Stew Director lead
(Staff #1). For violations & amendments, will be
Cons/Stew Director lead.
Staff #1: Hours of preparation time per inspection 0.00
Staff #1: Hours of monitoring time per inspection-excluding
travel time
0.00
Staff #1: Hours of reporting and follow up 0.5
Staff #2: Hours of preparation time per inspection 1.0
Staff #2: Hours of monitoring time per inspection-excluding 1.25 Overestimating slightly for larger relative size.
Staff #2: Hours of reporting and follow up per inspection 1.0
Other Staff: Hours per inspection 0.0
Equipment and supplies per inspection $10.00 Easement holders may depreciate the costs of
equipment (e.g., gps device, camera, computer) as
appropriate for the equipment and its use for each
property.
Number of regular monitoring visits per year 1
Property: New Farm Buffer Project (Wayne County, NC) 32.2 ac
Number of cars used per monitoring trip 1 Staff may travel separately to the property
Consultant costs per year $0.00 Depending on the features of the property and the
easement, the holder occasionally may need outside
expertise.
Number of drive-by monitoring trips per year 0.25 Occasional monitoring from the public road is
sometimes desirable to supplement on-site
inspections. (average rounded to 1 in 4 visits)
Staff #1: Average time (in hours) needed per drive-by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.00
Staff #2: Average time (in hours) needed per drive-by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.25
Cost of aerial flyover $10.00 Some organizations use aerial monitoring to
supplement onsite visits. We fly the drone we own.
Cost for incidentals and depreciation.
There will be an aerial flyover approximately every ____
years
3 For example, entering the number 20 would mean the
land trust expects 1 aerial flyover per 20 years.
Landowner Communication Expenses 1 landowner
Staff #1: Hours per year 0.75
Staff #2: Hours per year 1.00
Other Staff: Hours per year 0.00
Materials and supplies per year $0.00 For example, printing of educational materials and
postage
Landowner Communication Expenses: Change in
Landowner
These costs should reflect the time and costs
associated with one change in ownership. Stew
Coordinator Lead (Staff #2).
Staff #1: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
1.00
Staff #2: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
2.00
Other staff: Hours for establishing a relationship with new 0.50
Drive By and Flyover Monitoring Expenses (used occasionally)
Staff #1: Number of site visits needed to establish a
relationship with new landowner
0.00 This number may reflect an average for all properties
and therefore is not necessarily a whole number.
Staff #2: Number of site visits needed to establish a
relationship with new landowner
0.5 Reduced to 0.5 because these are generally planned
for the next annual monitoring visit with the new
landowner and not a second visit during the same
year.
Supplies $0.00 For example, a copy of the easement and materials
about the land trust's stewardship program
It is estimated that there will be one change in land
ownership every ____ years
30.0 This should not be zero.
Review of Reserved and Permitted Rights and
Approvals
The conservation easement document may specify
that the landowner will pay for the land trust's costs at
the time of review. If this is the case, enter zeros in
this section.
It is estimated that there will be one review every ___years 30.0 If the easement does not contain reserved or
permited rights, place a zero here.
Staff #1: Hours needed per action subject to review 1.00
Staff #2: Hours needed per action subject to review 2.00
Other staff: Hours needed per action subject to review 1.00
Staff #1: Number of site visits required to complete one 0.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required to complete one 1.00
Consultant costs per review $0.00
Land Trust Initiated Amendment Expenses If the landowner seeks an easement amendment, the
landowner would normally be expected to pay the
costs associated with the amendment at the time of
amendment. SCT has received feedback that prior
estimates were too low and have thus been
increased, as well as ocassional legal costs, for most
prudent long-term defense.
Staff #1: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
excluding travel time
7.00 Occasionally a holder will want to initiate an
amendment. The Pennsylvania Land Trust
Association has little empirical data on the costs of
these amendments, and no information on their
Staff #2: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
excluding travel time
0.00
Other staff: Hours needed to complete an amendment 1.00
Staff #1: Number of visits required per amendment 1.00
Staff #2: Number of visits required per amendment 0.00
It is estimated that there will be one land trust initiated
amendment every ____ years.
50 Got the feedback to increase the frequency.
Legal Expenses
Legal fees per year $250.00 Minor and miscellaneous legal expenses may be
incurred as the easement holder seeks to reconcile
monitoring findings with easement terms, the
landowner seeks clarification on easement terms, etc.
These costs are expected to occur with no particular
frequency. Many attorneys SCT works with donate
their time, but this is not always the case.
Minor Violation Incidents (resolved without resort to the On buffer projects with straightforward terms, this is red
It is estimated that there will be one minor violation every
____ years.
15.0 This should not be zero
Staff #1: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
3.00
Staff #2: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
1.00
Other staff: Hours needed to address the violation 0.50
Staff #1: Number of site visits required per violation 1.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required per violation 0.00
Legal costs per incident $500.00
Consultant costs per incident $0.00 Depending on the complexity and provisions of the
easement, easement holders should plan for the
costs of hiring a consultant.
Major Violation Incidents (requiring litigation)Reduced for buffer project type
It is estimated that there will be one major violation every
____ years
50 This should not be zero
Average cost to address major violation (staff, attorney,
court fees & other)
$10,000 Got the feedback not to reduce beyond ~$10k.
Conservation defense insurance annual premium $0.00 It is not our practice to insert this here - this line is
from another organization's template.
Annual Rate of Return
Average annual return on Stewardship Fund investments
less inflation rate
4.00%
Staff and Overhead Rates
Staff #1 Conservation Director: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$31.00
Staff #2 Stewardship Coordinator: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$20.00
Other Staff Executive Director: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$67.00
Office overhead costs (rent, insurance, equipment) as a 5%
Annual stewardship costs (including the cost to
respond to minor violations)
$876
Endowment needed to fully cover annual
stewardship costs
$21,899
Annual costs needed to defend against major
violations
$200
Endowment needed to fund easements against
major violations
$5,000
Total $26,899.39
Stewardship Needs-Final Calculations (This will automatically calculate
based on your entries in the estimations section)
Formulas used in this calculator to calculate total stewardship needs (the formalas are here to show users how total stewardship needs
Formulae Used
Staff Costs
Executive Director: Hourly rate, including overhead and $31.00 B94+(B94*B97)
Director of Conservation: Hourly rate, including overhead $27.00 B95+(B95*B97)
Field Biologist: Hourly rate, including overhead and benefits $17.00 B96+(B96*B97)
Travel Costs
Roundtrip mileage cost $6.50 B15*B17*2
Other reimbursable travel expenses $180.00 B18
Staff #1: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased $6.20 (B112*B16*2)
Staff #2: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased $5.40 (B113*B16*2)
Total Annual
Stewardship
Costs Formulae
Annual Monitoring Costs
Staff time per regular inspection $108.65 ((B21+B22+B23)*B112)+((B24+B25+B26)*B113)+(B2
Travel costs per regular inspection $186.50 (B117+B118)*B30
Consultant costs per regular inspection $0.00 B31
Supplies per regular inspection $10.00 B28
Annualized cost of drive-by monitoring $188 IF(B34=0,0,(B35*B119)+(B36*B120)+B117+B118)
Annualized cost of aerial flyover $3 IF(B38=0,0,(1/B38)*B37)
Total annual monitoring costs $496.33 (B124+B125+B127)*B29+B128+B129
Staff time $50.25 (B41*B112)+(B42*B113)+(B43*B114)
Supplies $0.00 B44
Total costs of general landowner communications $50.25 B133+B134
Annualized Costs of Landowner Communications-Change in Landownership
Staff time $96.20 (B47*B112)+(B48*B113)+(B49*B114)+(B50*B119)+(B
Travel costs $93.25 B50*(B117+B118)+B51*(B117+B118)
Supplies $0.00 B52
Likelihood of a new landowner in any given year 3% 1/B53
Annualized cost associated with new landowner $6.32 (B138+B139+B140)*B141
Annualized Costs for Review of Reserved and Permitted Rights and Approvals
These are all calculated automatically, you don't need to do anything!
Annual Costs of General Landowner Communications
Staff costs $107.40 (B112*B57)+(B113*B58)+(B114*B59)+(B60*B119)+(B
Travel costs $186.50 (B60*(B117+B118))+(B61*(B117+B118))
Consultant Costs $0.00 B62
Likelihood of an exercise of a reserved right in any given 3% IF(B56=0,0,1/B56)
Annualized cost for review and approval of reserved rights $9.80 (B145+B146+B147)*B148
Annual Costs of Holder Initiated Amendments
Staff time per amendment $240.20 (B65*B112)+(B66*B113)+(B67*B114)+(B68*B119)+(B
Travel costs per amendment $186.50 (B68*(B117+B118))+(B69*(B117+B118))
Likelihood of a holder initiated amendment in any given year 2% 1/B70
Total annualized holder initiated amendment costs $8.53 (B153+B154)*B155
Annual Legal Costs
Legal fees per year $250.00 B73
Total annual legal costs $250.00 B159
Total Annual Regular Stewardship Expenses $821.23 C130+C135+C142+C149+C156+C160
Minor Violations
Staff costs to address violation $134.70 (B112*B77)+(B113*B78)+(B114*B79)+(B80*B119)+(B
Travel costs $186.50 (B80*(B117+B118))+(B81*(B117+B118))
Legal costs $500.00 B82
Likelihood of violation in any given year 7% 1/B76
Total annualized cost to deal with minor violations $54.75 (B167+B168+B169)*B170
Major Violations
Cost to address violation $10,000 B87
Likelihood of major violation in any given year 2%1/B86
Annualized cost to deal with major violations $200.00 B174*B175
D. Endowment Calculations
C. Calculation of Costs Associated with Violations
Annual stewardship and minor violation costs $876 C162+C171
Average annual return on stewardship fund investments less 4.00% B91
Endowment needed to cover annual stewardship costs $21,899.39 C182/C183
Annual costs needed to defend against major violations $200.00 C176
Average annual return on stewardship fund investments less 4.00% B91
Endowment needed to fund easements against major $5,000.00 C187/C188