310109_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240801

)ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 7� - � 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �`.� `� f Owner Email:
Owner Name: (�,j� r j nk Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: n Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �(�/�/((�' ( C/V�(IA4 Integrator:
Certified Operator: C+,Lu;� . �(`j" Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
can to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed frorn any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [a/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste managernent system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [!2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 S/1212020 Cominaed

Facilit Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes QXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes a&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ,� 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): o7_3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes j o ❑ NA ❑ N 1'.
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [JNo ❑ NA ❑ NIF,
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NI:
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Eg o ❑ N A ❑ N L
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need [:] Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NF'
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes F,-LX' ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [!I/No ❑ NA ❑ NI?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NF
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ N 1?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NF,
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes &rNNo ❑ NA
Page 2 of 3 .511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:] Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [�fNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [Q"/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [:] Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E 2*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes LrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes E(N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ila by .t-D vt&s V3 j I"
Reviewer/Inspector Name: n h duo Phone: -�qa
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y1AfDate: j 2,y
Page 3 of 3 S 12/2020