310256_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240722

le
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 - F2—: Q� O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: goutine
liance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 'jvl Arrival Time: :Qa Departure Time: m County: �a,��y� Region:
Farm Name:��L7��1 (r6S duf m Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: _Ybhtafi �)2� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dr Cow
Farrow to Feeder DrD�PoultI Ca Capacity Pop.Po . Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Cominued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes FA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (5p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ([�f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes CVjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ��lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �T
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes (121,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (1�4_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes jo No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 6kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NI?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes (a No ❑ NA ❑ N F,
Reguired Records& Documents V�
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NI:
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes (M No ❑ NA ❑ N t�,
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design ❑Maps [:] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis [—]Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes &I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17
23. 1f selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Z Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No [] NA ONE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes QQ No ❑ N,\ ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes All NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes &No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 6% No NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 6%,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
s'e �'(Z'� z �66teG�'l
-��1 ons 4'oY1Y1. Mari`- ."bmcy-gQ nG 96 V
Veje,�. bye spy arowxd \ -J o l^
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V to _ _ Phone: 5z-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: v _ _ Date: 12Z--� - l.�
Page 3 of 3 511212020