NCG550193_Wasteload Allocation_19820421

t5Tb ` C- Nk rJG Et, 7G) ls'SN�`�-ckl- Cf°--M J`" 6\(41 •
Engineer Date Rec.
NP ES WASTE LOAD A LOCATION1r? FR
. .i
Ii Facility Name:
warren Prate 5 ikest C t Date: AM
v Existing 1I Permit No. • tAe (1(D"\_ Pipe No. : County: 1 ,, , .
o Proposed aig
U- Design Capacity (MGD) : O.00 0 3 Industrial (% of low) : Domestic (% of Flow) : l�
V_ Receiving Stream: vr � e L e/ t� /c.iL ae 1. Class: 3 Sub-Basin: _Q "6/
IZ o_ eed%1t00 (Please attach) Requestor: �' w ' 4'/ , Regional Office �G Lt
Reference USGS Quad:` � q
il
L 74'5W
C (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) •
Design Temp. : Drainage Area: Avg. Streamflow:
7Q10: Winter 7Q10: 30Q2:
�; Sloe:..
a, Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall) : P y
E Velocity (fps) : K1 (base e, per day, 20°C) : K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) :
0
c1
o
rr _Effluent Monthly 'Effluent Monthly 1
H
ID Characteristics Average Comments Characteristics Average Comments
c
21.y
f3o17 -
90 SSlil/
71 H- 6 5s.u.
s , 4).cal(011- e he% faDlit504061 ,
ell ' 7—SS 1
Original Allocation 1 ✓r ___--PLOTTED—
Revised Allocation I 1 Date(s) of Revision(s)
Co,of irmation
U (Please attach previous allocation)
1' 6 VP epared By: 11/7 (/!/LLi�L� Reviewed By: .46.02,, Date: 4,— 7—g;2.
J

- ,• For Appropriate Dischargers, List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
Effluent Monthly Maximum Daily
Characteristics Average Average Comments
Type of Product Produced Lbs/Day Produced Effluent Guideline Reference

I
1
I REQUEST NO . : 383
*:t***********:*******:* WASTELOAU ALLOCATION APPROVE 104
*********************
IFACILITY NAME : WARREN FRANKS RESIDENCE
MAY 25 1982
TYPE OF WASTE : DOMESTIC
RAL iQH fitGIONAL OFFICE
COUNTY DURHAM
REGIONAL OFFICE : RALEIGH REOUESTOR : J . W . REID
RECEIVING STREAM : FALLS LAKE SUBBASIN : 03-04 -01
:010 : 0 Cf- E W701.0 : CF'S. 3002 : CF.::
I+F;AINAGE AREA : 0 . 10 SO . MI . STREAM CLASS : C
***:*********************: RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ******t****************:r
WASTEFLOW (5 ) ( MOD ) . 0003 DISCHARGE Wii�c MODELED AS ENTCF'
BOD-S (MG/L. ) : 30 I NG AN AF i OF FALLS LAKE . THE
NH3- N ( MG/L ) : NR AVAILAI.LE DILUTION OF THE ARM
0+ . 0 . ( MG/L ) : t5 IS GREAT COMPARED TO THE DAILY
PH ( SU) : 6-9 VOLUME OF WASTEFLOW . THEREFORE
FECAL COLIFORM ( /100ML) : 1000 SECONDARY" LIMITS WILL PROTECT
ISO (MG/L ) : 30 THE D . O . STANDARD IN THIS ARM .
****************:*********:4**fi:**:***:4 *:, 4:**4***4**4:*********:**:*4.4.*:44:*********:*****
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ✓) EXISTING ( ) NEW ( ) 1
LIMIT'S ARE : RE'YISIOH ) COdFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUEI.i
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY :
MOI+ELER --Dr"ATE : __ __ _ _ . __ .
SUPERVISOR , MODELING GROUP : _ _ . _.__.._ . . _... __..DATE : _.._._... .._-.-... .......
/
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR : �. ____._I.l t__.__..___ ....._Dr'+TE : _...._.__.._Sf�4L.�Z
PERMITS MANAGER : __WLP DATE ZT J
0_
.,
1
APPROVED BY :
t211
DIVISION DIRECTOR : _._ _---._ +i,TF . _ ._.. ..

.. t •` ,
1

REQUEST NO . 383
,
********************* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
FACILITY NAME WARREN FRANKS RES
TYPE OF WASTE i DOMESTIC K4AY -
. mv�
COUNTY ^ DURHAM �
^ A8
,,,, . . ,~`` . REGIONAL OFFICE
REGIONAL OFFICE RALEIGH REQUESTOR : J^W^ REID
�
�
RECEIVING STREAM UT L LICK CR SUBBASIN : 03-04-01
� 7010 O CFS W7010 CFS 3002 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA i 0 . 10 SQ ^MI ^ STREAM CLASS : C
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ************************
�
WASTEFLOW ( S ) ( MGD ) ^ 0003 NO DISCHARGE IS RECOMMENDED ^
DOD-5 ( MG/L ) ON MAP , OUTFALL IS SHOWN TO BE
NH3-N (MG/L) DIRECTLY INTO THE FALLS RESER-
D . O ^ ( MG/L ) VOIR ^ THE ASSIMILATIVE CAPAC-
PH ( SU ) ITY OF THE ARM OF THE LAKE
FECAL COLIFORM ( /100ML ) : WHICH WOULD RECEIVE THE WASTE
TSS ( MG/L ) IS SEVERLY LIMITED ^ i
�
_� �
FACILITY IS 1 PROPOSED ( - / EXISTING ( ) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY :
" ^
MODELER DATE
HEAD , TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR ATE
PERMITS MANAGER ^ k��� �~f-
_ ^ ----_-----,�������-^�����u
APPROVED BY
BY �
DIVISION DIRECTOR ...........DATE � ----

e. • V
.

4//
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No^
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: (Mack Wigginsl
td
Y _ f
�••r.r'l'N}'r v:7:7i14�FV-N.R;'s.' 7
Date 2/5/93 RECEIVE .
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Durham FEB 1 7 a;',
Permit No. NCA951464 TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH
NcGssokg3
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION tiECEIVPII
1. Facility and Address: Warren Franks SFR 3,o _o\
Rt. 6, Box 165 A-2
Durham, NC 27703 ,Q
2 . Date of Investigation: 1/26/93 (--4.rrt L i - Grteu-
3 . Report Prepared by: Daniel Rowe
4 . Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Warren Franks
( 919) 596-4213
5. Directions to Site: From Raleigh take Six Forks Rd. to Hwy
98 and go West toward Durham, Make right onto Baptist
Rd. , (SR1807 ) and go 3 . 6 miles to drive on left.
6. Discharge Point(s) , List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 36°00 ' 27 ' Longitude: 78°44 ' 07"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. C24SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Creedmoor
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ?
Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included) : <10°

r ri
br .§ if° a
') )N...?'
, .

•
•
9. Location of nearest dwelling: -200 '
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Little Lick Crk
a. Classification: WS 1V NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No. : 03: 04: 01
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Falls Lake Water Supply
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 300 GPD(Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 300 GPD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity) ?
d. Date( s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years:
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities: Septic tank, sandfilter in parallel,
p
chlorination.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities:
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only) :
in development
approved
should be required not needed
X
2 . Residuals handling and utilization/disposal
scheme:Septic Hauler
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
permit no.
NPDES Permit Staff Report

Residuals Contractor
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify) :
3 . Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet) :
4. SIC Code(s) : 4952
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities i.e. . , non-contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 04 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: _ 4407
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1 . Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only) ?
2. Special monitoring or limitations ( including toxicity)
requests:
3 . Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate)
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non-discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation:
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Not within city service
Subsurface:
NPDES Permit Staff Report

•
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS- Mr. Franks had
originally applied for renewal of his existing NPDES permit. He
completed an application and sent the appropriate fee in at that
time. He was subsequently informed that a general permit would
be more appropriate for his system. He completed a general
permit application and sent in the appropriate fee. Upon
inspection of the system, it was discovered that the sandfilter
was in parallel and not dual, and therefore the RRO does not feel
that a general permit is appropriate due to the annual monitoring
requirements and the potential difficulty in meeting permitted
limits. The RRO recommends renewal of the NPDES permit in
accordance with the basin wide monitoring strategy.
44 (
ig tur o re ort preparer
Water Quality egional Supervisor
02 7/0;
Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report

•;;.��. �ai"Ei[jiiiEi S'�;� �iFEi��'y'i3'��i7�':.:.
II
1 II-- i /
\ 7iiiiii 1\ C!
7 O
II
2.30 ::. \ j
:i ..:r"::. '..:c'i o \\ \\ / =`°;iiiE=?''iiiiiF.SiEic iiiiciiiifi>iii:;"rcEliiEiE f! :`i:_ ., U /i
....... ..
\ v a
• EL � - i. II -_ ' /lam
......... ........
..__....__.. ,r.
.............
\ j \\.`�,
...:..............
(• ,.�-'Cerra_— i
I
:::. \ r •
1
•
�:�' �''��:i=:Si::=:'�_:::_:::::::::::��:?:::::::i:��ii::�iiiiiii�i::i::i:i::'1:'::::: ,::::::::::::::::�ii:::::.:.: .. \\ .. .. H.
�•::.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::.. .. :: •:::: c:r.::::c::::::::::.::::::::::::ca::::::::::::c::::::::::::: :..::r..::: c::: :::liiiilii i::::cil:::i:: i_i. \ ::: ::::::::e:::::-
..;;i;i.:�: �'" 'ii�i�i��i:7.-'. :: 2i :=�ii:i:::��:::::�::::::�::::::::::::::i:i_:: \ _._........_....._..._._...................................................... .::_w:::a._iiiii_i?
:i::::ii:z:�::��: i:lilliiiiiiiii:.1.111_"� �:�:� :�:::�'?::::.. .............................:::�::::::::: :::• :::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::::�: i:i:�:iii: -:c=:�r..a::•_e:::e_:::::::��:::::�:::::::::::: .,:::... .........-.
1 II i. /
1
ii;:riii.....,dijili.i.:::1!,:.1711.ill:ji.i.:..LL..11!1:ii.i.i.,!:,r..i.,..:,,,
yes =:..;. :: ........::.:::..:.:::..:: : :�::::-:>>:_...�;�:::::::::::::....... � :::�-:..:.::::; ::::::: =::°:. .
,
...............,!::::::::,.. .. ......
•
iili:./(1141. Ni,-:'...... -'1.i.iiiiiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiii-49:giii.iiileilligiiiillii'i.:- li A'11:',11F .--
................ 1 isiiiEi`:;liNiciiiiiiiiiiiSifi'r_iii.2iiiiC.2si,, :::!:: ':-,!::: ::o,
IL\ - ....: \ .1 ':',I. ''''' .:'...:.:-...:...)....-.........-,.:11-'.'1:1'.:11-1.-'...' ' :',..;:-='--'%\k"'jr---741ii:::(1'iTilliiiiiii....;!,....r.H.'i:'.:::::3:i:.:.:i':...'..;i:.
I
u \,
Up / o�.
..':kiii
•
• o s : . --VC
,--:. „-- .. t..
.,. ce. i ' .., .
=� >> \�:
FEET�82 '? V' ;,_..� .'�__ � • \\ �! _ - •��.—�`\
LI-
.nr
�i�:[:sla:[
_7:. . r___ . ‘.s,
v
36°O---- �03 �04 2 oso 000 FEET �p5 ipg 42'30"
P�\ Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
JF+� Control by USGS, NOS/NOAA, USCE, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey * E
O F MN
.c\ •
Tnnnn.anhv by nhntnarommnf.:' �h l f.n ^�•:^I - ^^-