20240998 Ver 1_HL-0008I table of contents_20240725

UW1I1I1I:1
Widening SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) from SR 2736
(Rock Service Station Rd) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Dr)
Wake County
Archaeology....................................................................................... 2
Historic Architecture........................................................................43
Tribal Coordination..........................................................................96
Permit Drawings with SWMP...........................................................99
CE-DIST-CIA....................................................................................118
NRTR— IPaC List -Threatened and Endangered Species.................177
PJD request and USACE letter........................................................221
DMS Mitigation Acceptance...........................................................267

Archaeology

Project TrackinD, No.:
.0.000�
bo ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM �P`A
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It
l is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult
separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team. ��
p Y p 'a` .
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No.
F.A. No:
HL-0008I
!LIcI&M
Federal Permit Required?
County
Document.
Wake
Federal CE
Funding: ❑ State
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type:
® Federal
usace
Project Description:
The project is located on SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) at SR 1106 (Old Stage Road) and SR 2736
(Rock Service Station Road) in Wake County, North Carolina. It involves improvements and
widening of Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive. The
archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) encompasses all areas of potential disturbance as
presented on the accompanying ARC-GIS mapping.
'SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES REVIEW: SURVEYREQUIRED
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions.
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input
required by state and federal laws. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply
because the project is federally funded. The Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) will serve
as the lead federal agency. Next, construction design and other data was examined (when
applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing
the improvement work. At this juncture, the APE was designed to capture all areas of -potential
impact within the project study area. The project length measures 0.75 mile and the width is 200ft
(100ft from each side of the SR 1006 center -line).
Once an APE was defined, a map review and site file search was conducted utilizing on-line
resources available from the Office of State Archaeology on Monday, August 23, 2021. One
previously documented archaeological site (31 WA1995), a prehistoric surface scatter, is located
within the APE. This resource was documented for the I-540 Southeastern Extension project by the
NCDOT. Due to landowner denial, no subsurface shovel testing could be conducted at the site
location. 31 WA1995 remains unassessed for NRHP eligibility as the site was avoided during
construction of I-540. A terrestrial archaeological survey should be undertaken to determine the
location of 31 WA1995 as it relates to the currently defined APE for this project and to ascertain the
NRHP eligibility status of the resource should it be situated in the APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally
Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing
resources available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of noteworthy
historic occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these
mapped resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED" FORM
1 of2

Project Tracking No.:
I - DS�oao
archaeological components are situated within or proximal to the APE. In addition, historic maps
of Wake County were appraised to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries,
or other confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical
reference materials were inspected as well. In general, the cultural background review established
that no NRHP properties or cemeteries are located within the APE.
Next, the APE was referenced on topographic, geologic, flood boundary, lidar and NRCS soil
survey maps for the evaluation of environmental, geomorphological, hydrological, and other
correlatives that may have resulted in past occupation in the project corridor. Also, aerial
photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer & other on-line sources) were examined and the Google
Street View map application was utilized (when amenable) for gaining a virtual, first-hand
perspective of the overall study area and for assessing disturbances, both natural and human
induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites/deposits. Environmental
determinants suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery within the APE.
Based on advantageous environmental perameters, the location of several archaeological sites in
the vicinity, and the need to assess the location and eligibility status of 31 WA1995, an
archaeological survey is recommended prior to construction activities. This work will seek to
determine if archaeological features, artifacts, or deposits are contained within the project APE. All
documented sites will be evaluated for NRHP eligibility.
We can complete these investigations using one of the Archaeology Team's on -call firms or if
Division 5 would like to manage and complete the survey they can use a NCDOT prequalified
archaeologist under contract with one of Division's on -call firms. We can provide a scope of work
for the Division to use, but we do need to know within seven days which path the Division plans to
follow. All products produced by the Division's consultant will need to be submitted to the
Archaeology Team for review, acceptance, and submittal to the Office of State Archaeology as per
the Programmatic Agreement. We would be happy to discuss this approach with you.
(This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the following federally recognized
tribes have expressed an interest: Catawba Indian Nation. We recommend that you ensure that this
documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process described in the current NCDOT
Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.)
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST — SUR VEYREQ UIRED
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
Winter 2021
Proposed fieldwork completion date
Date
2020 PROGRAMMA7IC AGREEMEN7'ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED" FORM
2 of 2

Cloverdale
Project Vicinity Map _
HL-00081
Emerald
Old Stage Road (SR 1006) at Rock Village
Service Station Road (SR 2736).
Widen Old Stage Road from Rock
Service Station Road to Rolling Garner °ywyw
Meadows Drive
Forest Hills
Wake County y
Pine Hurst Auburn
a� Park
F ale <�; bg TO
4V
6, i°IdDr w
HiHh
(L
I..
gikamnn'Rd °a
ICCullers t'°p A
rossroads to
C K'hlrc ao+Rd ,;
5D o' CIIIf°rd ftd �+
Williams a`
Crossroads
Dh°r°h-Rd.
j'
Project Study Area
n
q
Juniper /
eti
/
State of north Cara

Portion of the Lake Wheeler topographic map displaying the location and boundaries of the archaeological APE.

2/23/2022 Pro "ect Tracking No.
21-08-0005
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES _
PRESENT FORM ;;
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project.
o.:..
s It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult
separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No:
F.A. No:
HL-0008I
49367.1.5
n/a
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Funding:
® Yes ❑ No
Wake
Federal CE
❑ State ® Federal
Permit Type: USACE
Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 5 is
proposing improvements to and widening of Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station
Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive. The NCDOT has established an archaeological Area
of Potential Effects (APE) that measures approximately 0.75 mile in length and encompasses
approximately 45 acres, inclusive of existing roadways and development.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
An archaeological survey and evaluation of the proposed improvements to Old Stage Road and Rock
Service Station Road was conducted during December 2021 and January 2022 by Melissa McKay,
Becky Sponseller, Kristin Doshier, and Connor Seaton of Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon).
During the course of the survey, two new archaeological sites, 31 WA2455 and 31 WA2456, were
recorded and one previously recorded archaeological site, 31WA1995, was revisited within the APE.
In addition, a small cemetery (31 WA2457) was recorded approximately 70 meters west of the APE,
and will be avoided by the project as currently planned. Because this cemetery is located well outside
of the direct APE, the site was not investigated or assessed for its NRHP eligibility, and a site
description is not included in this report. The cemetery was assigned a site trinomial and a North
Carolina Cemetery Form was completed, however.
None of the sites within the APE are recommended Eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP). It is recommended that the proposed project be allowed to proceed without concern
for impacts to significant cultural resources.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Team has reviewed
the .subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area
of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed.)
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
1of12

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
Other:
Signed:
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
® Photos ❑Correspondence
2/23/2022
Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
2of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
INTENSIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY & EVALUATION
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
TIP HL-0008I
PA 21-08-0005; WBS# 49367.1.5
By: Melissa McKay, RPA
For:
Archaeology Team
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Terracon Consultants, Inc (Terracon) of Raleigh, North Carolina conducted an intensive
archaeological survey and evaluation of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed
improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) in Wake
County, North Carolina (TIP HL-0008I, PA No. 21-08-0005, WBS No. 49367.1.5). The APE
measures approximately 0.75 mile in length and encompasses approximately 45 acres, inclusive of
existing roadways and development (Figures 1 and 2).
The main goal of the investigation was to identify and assess the significance of cultural resources
(archaeological sites) that might occur within the project APE. "Significant" cultural resources are
those meeting the criteria of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
as defined in 36 CFR 60.4. This investigation was conducted by Terracon for the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to fulfill the requirements of Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 1966, as amended) and is administered under the 2020
Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects between the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), NCDOT, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), and the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Fieldwork was designed to comply with
guidelines established by the Office of the Secretary of the Interior of the United States and in
consultation with the NCDOT.
Background Summary
Research conducted on behalf of Terracon by the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA)
on December 6, 2021 revealed that one previously recorded site, 31WA1995, was located within the
APE, and two additional previously recorded sites (31 WA1991 and 31 WA1993) were mapped within
0.25 mile of the APE (Figure 3; Table 1). All three sites were recorded during a survey conducted
in 2017 by Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc. for the Preferred Alternative for the Complete 540
Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension in Wake and Johnston Counties (Stair et al. 2017). The
APE encompassed approximately 5,693.2 acres and was approximately 37.46 miles in length.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
3of12

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
Table 1: Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within 0.25 Mile of the APE
Site Number Component NRHP Status Within APE?
31WA1991 19t'to 20t' c. Early to Late Not Eligible No
Archaic
31 WA1993 Late 18t' to Mid-20t' c. Not Eligible No
31WA1995 Early to Middle Archaic Unassessed Yes
During the 2017 investigations, four previously recorded sites were revisited, and 63 new sites and
69 isolated finds were recorded. One site, 31WA1997, was recommended Eligible for the NRHP.
Sites 31 WA 1991 and 31 WA 1993 were recommended Not Eligible for the NRHP. Site 31 WA 1995,
located within the current APE, was not assessed for the NRHP because no shovel tests were
excavated at the site due to landowner denial.
Approximately 10 acres in the northern portion of the current APE were included in the 2017 survey.
However, it does not appear that any shovel testing was conducted in this area due landowner denial,
disturbance, slope, or low and wet areas. Portions of three fields along the east side of Old Stage Road
were subjected to pedestrian survey, which led to the discovery of Site 31WA1995. This site was
revisited during the current investigations and is described below (see Summary of Field
Investigations).
Research conducted using the North Carolina HPOWEB GIS service database on December 8, 2021
revealed that 13 previously recorded historic properties are located within 0.25 mile of the APE,
including eight that are located directly within the APE (see Figure 3; Table 2). All but one of these
resources have been determined to be Not Eligible for the NRHP, including two which have been
demolished. The B.N. Ferrell House and Farm Store (two resources both identified as WA1214) were
placed on the Study List in 1991; however, a 2012 historic architecture resource survey for the
Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension in Wake and Johnson Counties discovered that the Store
had since been demolished (Alexander and Mattson 2012), and HPOWEB indicates that the House is
Not Eligible for the NRHP.
Table 2: Historic Properties within 0.25 Mile of the APE
Resource Number
Name
NRHP Status
Within APE?
WA1214
B.N. Ferrell House and Farm Store
Study List (Gone);
Yes
Not Eligible
WA5716
Johnny W. & Viola Russell House
Not Eligible (Gone)
No
WA5717
Hickman & Addie Lee McGee House
Not Eligible (Gone)
No
WA5718
House
Not Eligible
No
WA5719
House
Not Eligible
No
WA5721
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA5722
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA5723
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA5724
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA5725
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA6371
House
Not Eligible
No
WA6372
House
Not Eligible
Yes
WA6374
House
Not Eligible
No
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
4of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
Topographic maps, aerial photography, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil survey
maps, and historic maps were examined for information on natural or cultural factors that might have
affected site locations or preservation. In general, with the exception of the topographic quadrangle
maps, the historical maps available were not at a scale sufficient to show possible structure locations
with any accuracy or detail. Historical aerial photography was also consulted to determine changes
in land use over time as well as to look for former structure locations.
The c. 1910 to 1919 Wake County Rural Delivery Routes Map depicts road alignments in this vicinity
that differ from the current alignments of Banks Road and Old Stage Road (Figure 4, top). The 1914
Wake County Soil Map (Figure 4, bottom) depicts Banks Road, Old Stage Road, and Rock Service
Station Road in alignments similar to their current ones (although none of the roads are labeled on
this map). The soil map depicts two structures within the APE east of Old Stage Road, and several
just outside the APE boundary. The 1938 Wake County Highway Map and 1964 Lake Wheeler, NC
quadrangle map depict several structures within the vicinity of the APE (Figure 5).
Aerial imagery from 1969 shows several structures within the central and northern portions of the
APE (Figure 6). Many of these structures appear to represent currently extant dwellings.
Environmental Setting
The APE is located within the Piedmont physiographic province. Elevations within the APE range
from approximately 340 to 400 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The APE is situated in the Neuse
River Basin. Panther Branch is located between 0.7 and 1.1 kilometers west of the APE. An unnamed
tributary of Panther Branch falls within the APE just south of Banks Road and terminates in an
artificial pond. Little Creek is located between approximately 0.45 and 0.55 kilometers east of the
APE. A tributary of Little Creek enters the APE along the eastern side of Rock Service Station Road
just south of its intersection with Old Stage Road and terminates in an artificial pond.
The APE is comprised primarily of residential areas interspersed with agricultural fields and wooded
areas (see Figures 7 and 8 for overview photographs of the APE). A church is situated within the
northern portion of the APE, and a gas station and convenience store are located just north of the Old
Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection. The area surrounding the APE is similarly
comprised primarily of residential, agricultural, and wooded areas.
Map units (soil series) are named for the major soil or soils within the unit but may have minor
inclusions of other soils. The soil map for Wake County shows five soil series occurring within the
APE (NRCS 2021; Table 3; Figure 9). The majority of the APE (approximately 37.9 acres) are
mapped as well drained soils, with the remaining areas mapped as moderately well drained Gritney
sandy loam.
Table 3: Proiect Area Soils
Soil Name
Code
Slope
Drainage
Landform
Cecil -Urban land complex
CfC
2-10%
Well drained
Interfluves
Dothan loamy sand
DoA
0-2%
Well drained
Interfluves
Dothan loamy sand
DoB
2-6%
Well drained
Interfluves
Gritney sandy loam
GrC
6-10%
Moderately well drained
Interfluves
Pacolet sandy loam
PaD
10-15%
Well drained
Interfluves
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
5of12

Project Tracktn No.
21-08-0005
Summary of Field Investigations
The current archaeological investigation included pedestrian (visual) inspection and shovel testing
within the APE. A systematic visual inspection of the APE was undertaken to search for surface
artifacts, above -ground resources, or other signs of cultural activity. Shovel tests were excavated at
30-meter (98.43-foot) intervals in areas determined suitable for shovel testing. No shovel tests were
excavated in wetlands/hydric areas, disturbed soils, landscaped residential or commercial areas, or on
slopes greater than 15 percent. Shovel tests measured approximately 38 centimeters (15 inches) in
diameter and were excavated by natural levels to sterile subsoil or the water table, or as deep as is
practicable given the limitations of subsurface testing through this methodology. A total of 51 shovel
tests, including transect and site delineation shovel tests, were excavated during the current
investigation (Figures lOa—b).
Many areas within the APE were not suitable for shovel testing due to landscaped residential and
commercial areas and disturbed utility corridors. Artificial ponds prevented shovel testing in some
areas within the southern portion of the APE.
Shovel test profiles varied across the APE. Soils in less disturbed portions of the APE generally
consisted of 10 to 45 centimeters of grayish brown, yellowish brown, or olive brown sandy loam over
strong brown or brownish yellow sandy clay subsoil. Occasionally, a stratum was encountered
between the plow zone and subsoil, which was a brown, light yellowish brown, or olive yellow loamy
sand or sandy loam that was generally between 5 and 20 centimeters thick.
Disturbed soils were encountered in several shovel tests, including in some areas east of Old Stage
Road north of its intersection with Rock Service Station Road. For example, shovel test (ST)80-2 and
ST80-4 consisted between 25 and 30 centimeters of dark grayish brown loamy sand over mottled very
dark gray and black sandy clay. Shovel test 80-4 also encountered road gravel in the first stratum.
As a result of the current investigation, two new archaeological sites, 31WA2455 and 31WA2456,
were recorded and one previously recorded site, 31WA1995, was revisited. The results of these
investigations are described below (see Figure 11 for site locations).
In addition, a small cemetery (31WA2457) was noted by field crew approximately 70 meters west of
the APE and will be avoided by the project as currently planned. Because this cemetery is located
well outside of the direct APE, the site was not formally investigated or assessed for its NRHP
eligibility, and a site description is not included in this report.
31WA1995 Revisit
UTM: 17S 710955mE 3946860mN
Site Size: 641m2
Elevation: 395 feet amsl
Environmental Setting: Agricultural Field
Soils: DoA, Dothan loamy sand, 0-2% slopes; DoB, Dothan loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
Surface Visibility: 75-100%
Field Procedures: Pedestrian Inspection; Shovel Testing (n=5)
Cultural Affiliation: Precontact Early to Middle Archaic; Early Woodland; Historic-19th to 20th
Century
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
6of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
Site Function: Precontact—Limited Activity; Historic —Domestic
Site Integrity: Poor
Recommendations: Not Eligible; No Further Work
Site Description: Site 31WA1995 was originally recorded as an Early to Middle Archaic Period site
in 2017 during an archaeological survey for the preferred alternative for the 540 Triangle Expressway
Southeast Extension (Stair et al. 2017). Pedestrian survey yielded 60 precontact period lithic artifacts,
which included 57 pieces of debitage (quartz and metavolcanic), a rhyolite Kirk Stemmed projectile
point fragment, a rhyolite Morrow Mountain II projectile point, and a quartz biface. No subsurface
testing was conducted at the site due to the landowner denying access to the property after the initial
surface inspection. Because no subsurface testing was conducted, the site was not assessed for the
NRHP.
During the current investigation, this area, situated within a recently plowed agricultural field,
exhibited high surface visibility (between 75 and 100%). Pedestrian inspection was conducted at 10
meter intervals. As a result, a total of 23 artifacts were recovered from the surface (Figures 12 and
13; Table 4). Five shovel tests were excavated within the site boundary and two shovel tests (dl and
d5) yielded two subsurface artifacts (both from the plow zone).
Table 4: Site 31WA1995 Revisit Artifacts
Prov.
Strat.
Depth
(cmbs)
Comp.
Category
Description
n=
dl
I
0-10
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
1
B
0
surf
Historic/Modem
glass
brown, bottle
1
sprite green, curved
1
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
2
quartz debitage
1
d5
0
surf
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic projectile point stem
1
quartz debitage
2
1
0-25
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
1
SF 1
0
surf
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic biface
1
SF2
0
surf
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
5
quartz debitage
2
SF3
0
surf
Precontact
lithic
quartz debitage
1
quartz projectile point (Swannanoa)
1
SF4
0
surf
Historic
ceramic
refined earthenware, brown glaze
1
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
1
SF5
0
surf
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic biface
2
metavolcanic debitage
1
Total
25
Soils in the shovel tests generally consisted of 10 to 30 centimeters of yellowish brown loamy sand
over brownish yellow or reddish yellow sandy clay subsoil (see Figure 13, bottom for a
representative shovel test profile).
The 25 artifacts included 22 precontact lithic artifacts and three historic period or modern artifacts.
The precontact artifacts included 17 pieces of debitage (II metavolcanic and six quartz), three
metavolcanic biface fragments, a metavolcanic projectile point stem (unidentified), and a broken
quartz projectile point (possible Swannanoa). The three historic period or modern artifacts included
two pieces of glass (brown bottle glass and green glass), and a piece of refined earthenware. The two
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
7of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
pieces of glass were recovered approximately 45 feet east of the road and likely represent modern
bottle glass.
Summary and Recommendations: This site was originally recorded as an Early to Middle Archaic
Period site during a 2017 archaeological survey for the preferred alternative for the 540 Triangle
Expressway Southeast Extension (Stair et al. 2017). During the 2017 investigations, the site was not
shovel tested and was considered Unassessed for its NRHP eligibility.
During the current investigation, a total of 25 artifacts were recovered from the site (22 precontact
and three historic/modern). A possible Swannanoa projectile point suggests an Early Woodland
Period occupation. Pedestrian survey recovered 23 artifacts from the surface of the field. Five shovel
tests were excavated and only two subsurface artifacts were recovered from the disturbed plow zone
of two shovel tests. Although three biface fragments and two projectile point fragments were
recovered from the site, all were found on the surface. In addition, no intact subsurface deposits or
cultural features were recorded.
The original site boundary recorded during the 2017 investigation extends beyond the current APE;
the current investigations were limited to the portion of the site located within the APE. The portion
of the site within the current APE does not have the potential to yield significant or unique information
to the precontact or historic occupation of the area. This portion of the site is recommended Not
Eligible for the NRHP; no additional archaeological work is recommended for this location.
31 WA2455
UTM: 17S 710662mE 3945758mN
Site Size: 177m2
Elevation: 372 feet amsl
Environmental Setting: Maintained Lawn
Soils: DoB, Dothan loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
Surface Visibility: <25%
Field Procedures: Shovel Testing (n=6)
Cultural Affiliation: Precontact Lithic (Unknown Subperiod)
Site Function: Isolated Find
Site Integrity: Poor
Recommendations: Not Eligible; No Further Work
Site Description: Shovel testing northwest of Old Stage Road, south of its intersection with Rock
Service Station Road, yielded a single precontact period lithic artifact from ST78-8 (Figures 14 and
15; Table 5). Delineation shovel testing at 15-meter intervals yielded no additional cultural materials.
No delineation shovel testing was conducted to the northwest of the positive shovel test due to the
APE boundary.
Soils in ST78-8 consisted of 10 centimeters of olive brown loamy sand over 50 centimeters of light
yellowish brown sand. Subsoil, encountered at 60 centimeters below surface (cmbs), consisted of
mottled olive yellow, brownish yellow, and yellowish red sandy clay (see Figure 15, bottom).
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
8of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
Table 5: Site 31WA2455 Artifacts
Prov. Strat. Depth Comp. Category Description n=
(cmbs)
78-8 II 10-60 Precontact lithic metavolcanic debitage 1
Total I
Summary and Recommendations: This site consists of a single piece of non -diagnostic lithic debitage
recovered from a shovel test. No intact subsurface deposits or cultural features were recorded, and
the low artifact density does not suggest a significant level of precontact activity in this area. The
portion of the site within the APE does nothave the potential to yield significant orunique information
to the precontact occupation of the area. This portion of the site is recommended Not Eligible for the
NRHP; no additional archaeological work is recommended for this location.
31 WA2456
UTM: 17S 710971mE 3946960mN
Site Size: 767m2
Elevation: 395 feet amsl
Environmental Setting: Agricultural Field
Soils: DoA, Dothan loamy sand, 0-2% slopes; DoB, Dothan loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
Surface Visibility: 75-100%
Field Procedures: Pedestrian Inspection; Shovel Testing (n=3)
Cultural Affiliation: Precontact Early to Middle Archaic; Historic —Mid 19th to 20th Century
Site Function: Precontact—Limited Activity; Historic —Domestic
Site Integrity: Poor
Recommendations: Not Eligible; No Further Work
Site Description: Pedestrian survey within a recently plowed agricultural field with high surface
visibility (between 75 and 100%) east of Old Stage Road yielded nine artifacts from the surface
(Figures 16 and 17). Three shovel tests were excavated within this area, and one shovel test, d3,
yielded a piece of whiteware from the first stratum (plow zone).
Soils in the shovel tests consisted of 15 to 30 centimeters of yellowish brown loamy sand over
brownish yellow or reddish yellow sandy clay subsoil (see Figure 17, bottom for a representative
shovel test profile). Shovel test dl encountered a thin 5 centimeter -thick lens of light yellowish brown
sand between the first and second strata.
Of the 10 artifacts recovered from the site, six were historic period artifacts and four were precontact
lithic artifacts (Table 6). The historic period artifacts included three pieces of undecorated whiteware
and three pieces of glass (light aqua, brown, and milk glass). The precontact artifacts included three
pieces of metavolcanic debitage and one metavolcanic Stanly projectile point (indicating an Early to
Middle Archaic Period occupation). All four of the precontact period artifacts were found on the
surface near shovel test dI.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
9of12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
Table 6: Site 31WA2456 Artifacts
Prov. Strat. Depth
(cmbs)
Comp.
Category
Description
n=
dl 0 surf
Historic
glass
light aqua., curved
1
Precontact
lithic
metavolcanic debitage
3
metavolcanic projectile point
I
(Stanly)
d2 0 surf
Historic
glass
brown, bottle
1
milk, curved 1
d3 0 surf Historic ceramic whiteware, undecorated 1
I 0-30 Historic ceramic whiteware, undecorated 1
SF 1 0 surf Historic ceramic whiteware, undecorated 1
Total 10
A structure is depicted in this vicinity on the 1914 Wake County Soil Map (see Figure 4). According
to Wake County tax records, the house to the south of the site (HPOWEB Resource WA5722) was
constructed in 1924. A 2012 architectural survey determined this house lacked integrity and was
recommended Not Eligible for the NRHP (Alexander and Mattson 2012). It is likely that the historic
component of Site 31WA2456 is related to this adjacent structure, or the structure depicted in this
area on the 1914 Wake County Soil Map.
Summary and Recommendations: The precontact component of this site consists of three pieces of
nondiagnostic lithic debitage and a Stanly projectile point recovered from the surface. The historic
component consists of a low density scatter of glass and ceramic materials recovered from the exposed
ground surface or disturbed plow zone.
The overall low artifact density and lack of subsurface deposits limits any specific interpretation of
this site. The site is not associated with events (Criterion A) or persons (Criterion B) significant to
local or regional history. No above ground structural remains were recorded, precluding an evaluation
of the site under Criterion C. This archaeological site does not have the potential to yield significant
or unique information regarding local or regional history or prehistory (Criterion D). This site is
recommended Not Eligible for the NRHP under Criteria A—D; no additional archaeological work is
recommended for this location.
Summary
Based on the results of the background research and field investigations, no NRHP-eligible
archaeological resources are located within the APE for the proposed improvements to SR 1006 (Old
Stage Road) and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) in Wake County, North Carolina. As a result
of the investigation, two new archaeological sites, 31 WA2455 and 31 WA2456, were recorded and
one previously recorded site, 31WA1995, was revisited (Table 7) within the APE. None of these sites
are recommended eligible for the NRHP.
In addition, a small cemetery (31 WA2457) was recorded approximately 70 meters west of the APE,
and will be avoided by the project as currently planned. Because this cemetery is located well outside
of the direct APE, the site was not formally investigated or assessed for its NRHP eligibility, and a
site description is not included in this report.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
10 of 12

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
Table 7: Summary of Site Data
Site No. Cultural Affiliation Site Type Recommendations
Precontact; Historic Limited Activity; *
31 WA1995 Revisit Period Domestic Not Eligible; NFW
31 WA2455 Precontact
Isolated Find
Not Eligible; NFW*
Precontact; Historic
31 WA2456
Limited Activity;
Not Eligible; NFW *
Period
Domestic
31 WA2457** Historic Period
Cemetery
Preservation by Avoidance
*NFW No Further Work
**Located outside of the APE
It is recommended that the proposed project be allowed to proceed without concern for impacts to
significant cultural resources. Should the boundary of the proposed APE be expanded or moved,
additional archaeological investigations may be necessary, as determined in consultation with the
NCDOT and/or SHPO per the Programmatic Agreement.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
11 of 12

Project Traclan No.
21-08-0005
REFERENCES CITED
Alexander, Frances and Richard Mattson
2012 Historic Architectural Resources Survey Report, Triangle Expressway Southeast
Extension, Wake and Johnston Counties, NCDOT TIP Nos. R-2721, R-2828, R-2829.
Mattson, Alexander and Associates, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
2020 Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration,
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, North Carolina
Department of Transportation, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officefor the Transportation Program in
North Carolina.
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
1966 National Historic Preservation Act. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Part 800.
United States of America: Washington D.C.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
2021 Wake County, North Carolina Soil Survey. Tabular Data. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture Web Soil Survey.
http:Ilwebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.,gov accessed 8 December 2021.
Stair, Joseph, Rhiannon M. Jones, Amy Krull, D. Allen Poyner, Amanda K. Stamper, Jeroen van
den Hurk, and Susan E. Bamann
2017 Intensive Archaeological Survey and Evaluation of the Preferred Alternative for
Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension, Wake and Johnston
Counties, North Carolina. Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc. Tarboro, NC. Ms.
on file, North Carolina Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh.
United States Bureau of Soils: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
1914 Soil Map, North Carolina, Wake County Sheet. On file, North Carolina State
Archives, Raleigh. https://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ncmaps/id/301, accessed
8 December 2021.
United States Geological Survey
1964 Lake Wheeler, N.C. 1:24,000 Topographic Quadrangle Map. U.S. Department of the
Interior, Washington D.C.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
12 of 12

a
N �a
cj
Q� Simpki
a
c Lake Na'heeloi
Willow spring
Legend
MAPE
Gr°vvnvnt Rd
Gam
a •
�rrnn� flr E
Lake Bana°n
Y
Rand Rd
Pph"T n Rai
J
T {
,1
J
J
J J
r
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),
NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
C�7
1.5
Miles
3
Drwn:
MM
Project Vicinity
FIGURE
U
NO.
Chkd:TR
TIP No. HL-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
Project No.:
70217777cSR
2736 (Rock Service Station Road)Date:
Wake County, North Carolina
February 2022

�N7]

10
Legend
31 WA1991 WA5716
♦ WA5717
�r♦
31 WA1993••
•
Stair et
al. 2017
•
•WA571— 8-
•
L�WA5719
■
♦
WA5721 �
■
L�—WA5722
•
WA5723 D-31 WA1995
■
WA1214
•
'
(Store)
■
z"i--WA5724
•
z�i--WA5725
■
■
■
■
■
sL—WA6371
'
♦ i
WA1214 �WA6372
■_
•
(House)
00
0
WA6374
■
■
r
■
0.25
ziMiles
0.5
MAPE r--1 Previous Archaeological Surveys (Approximate) A Historic Properties (HPOWEB)
"' ';0.25-Mile Buffer = Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites
D rwn:
MM
�onry
�4Rp
Previous Investigations
FIGURE
A�oF
9
m
No.
Chkd: TR
TIP No. HL-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
3
Project No
70217777C
��r,
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake Count y, North Carolina
Date:yroFra�
February 2022

lh®
c. 1910 to 1919 Rural Delivery Routes Map showing Project Vicinity
1914 Wake County Soil Map
Historical Maps
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
4

'Y,OF M� IP°
° + # • . t+ops + •
• ' Csr
a �
3 A * • *; r
� r • 4 +r
7
r r
1938 Wake County Highway Map showing Project Vicinity
1964 Lake Wheeler, NC Topographic Quadrangle Map
Historical Maps
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
5

1969 Aerial Photograph showing APE
Source: NCDOT Aerial Index
Historical Aerial Photographs
IP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Roa
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
6

Overview of APE, facing Southwest
Overview of APE, facing North
Project Area Photographs
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
7

FBI
DoB �� DoB
h I
RaA
PaE GrC
�. W
GrC -
iwC
DoB
Wi
r,*,It.
�1
CfC
Soil Mapping Units
CfC Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes
DoA Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
DoB Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
GrC Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
PaD Pacolet sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
W Water
Legend
APE
NRCS Soil Boundary
11PmLi
RA
We
Kilometers
0 0.25 0.5
ki I
DuB1I
Drwn:
MM
K°nry
NRCS Soils
FIGURE
of
�pI
9
m
No.
Chkd: TR
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
9
Project No.:
70217777c
�� �¢
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Date:yroFrn►H'Q°e
February 2022
Wake County, North Carolina

O i
O
O
31 WA1995
Revisit
O -
t.
Source: Terracon (Field Data) 2022; APE provided by NCDOT O
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and is not O S urCe: E— rl, M ar, Ge E- e, E rth&tar GeoFaphlcs, CN.. Airbus DS,
suitable for, legal or engineering purposes.
n
USDA, IJSGS,A GRID, IGN, d he GIS lJ er_C—onlm:unity
Legend
III APE O Negative Shovel Test
Site Boundary • Positive Shovel Test Meters
0 60 120 240
Pedestrian Survey Surface Positive
Developed/Disturbed x Shovel Test Not Dug
Drwn: MM
1AW11 c
Shovel Test Locations
FIGURE
of
�pI
9
m
NO.
Chkd: TR
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
Project No.:
10a
70217777c
��r,
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Date:
February 2022
yrOFT"A
Wake County, North Carolina

f
0
O
31 WA2455 0
00 F
O'
0
O
- - _ O
Source: Terracon (Field Data) 2022; APE provided by NCDOT
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and is not
suitable for, legal or engineering purposes.
Legend
APE 0 Negative Shovel Test
Site Boundary • Positive Shovel Test Meters
0 60 120 240
Pedestrian Survey + Surface Positive
Developed/Disturbed x Shovel Test Not Dug
Drwn:
MM
K°nry cgg
Shovel Test Locations
FIGURE
a��F
D
`p
No.
Chkd:
TR
m
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
10b
Project No..
70217777C
��r,
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Date:
February 2022
yrOFT"A
Wake County, North Carolina

■ L
3r1WA2456 _ r
f ..
r )
i ■
i
` V31 WAI 995
Revisit
It u
ti
� b
3�1 WA2457 1A _
.74
4
31 WA2455
-410
. � a
■ f ■
■ f a • aa�f
f �
As a
■
■
■ ■ ■ a a S
100,
Legend
MAPE Miles
=Site Boundary 0 0.25 0.5
Drwn:
MM
�onry
�4Rp
Archaeological Site Locations
FIGURE
A�oF
9
m
No.
Chkd: TR
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
11
ProjectN0:
70217777C
q v
g�OFTRAHSY'
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake Count Y, North Carolina
Date:
February 2022

N Roiling M�aaow
s a
46-1
O
d3—,
SF3
d5
SF5
F4 +
d1 �
'. SF1
+O
d2
1 ' . Original Site
Bounndary
d4
O
0995 Revisit
_ C
=ld Data) 2022; APE provided by NCDOT Z
mation depicted on this figure is for
=s only and was not prepared for, and is notmr/ Meters
engineering purposes. O 15 30
Legend
APE Pedestrian Survey�vree O Negative Shovel Test + Surface Positive
Site Boundary E�:] Building Road 0 Positive Shovel Test x Shovel Test Not Dug
Drwn:
MM
F HonrN c
Archaeological Site Plan: 31 WA1995 Revisit
FIGURE
Iwo �o
q `9
No.
Chkd:
TR
m
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
12
Project No.:
70217777C
q� �¢
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake Count North Carolina
Y�
Date:yroFmpH,4°Q
February 2022

Overview of 31WA1995 (Revisit), facing South -Southeast
Shovel Test dl Profile
Archaeological Site Photographs: 31 WA1995 (Revisit)
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
13

JJ�
N JJ
J
J✓
\J
J
lJ
`J
J
78-7
O
d2
31 WA2455 O
1,
1
78-8
d1 d3
O O
x
O 78-9 e
� C�a
Legend
APE Pedestrian Survey�vree O Negative Shovel Test + Surface Positive
Site Boundary E�:] Building Road 0 Positive Shovel Test x Shovel Test Not Dug
Drwn:
MM
F Hpgr+r
Archaeological Site Plan: 31 WA2455
FIGURE
hvw° �o�z
O.
Chkd:
TR
9
m
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
14
Project No.:
70217777C
q� �¢
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake Count North Carolina
Y�
Date:yroFMpH,4°Q
February 2022

Overview of Site 31WA2455, facing Northeast
FP
,C.
f
Shovel Test 78-8 Profile
Archaeological Site Photographs: 31 WA2455
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
15

45-1
O
Source: Terracon (Field Data) 2022; APE provided by NCDOT
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and is not
suitable for, legal or engineering purposes.
Legend
MAPE
Site Boundary
Pedestrian Survey�vree
Building
Road
WA2456
Meters
0 15 30
O Negative Shovel Test + Surface Positive
• Positive Shovel Test x Shovel Test Not Dug
Drwn:
MMO.
F HonrN
Archaeological Site Plan: 31 WA2456
FIGURE
hvw° �o�z
Chkd:
TR
9
m
TIP No. H L-00081
Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and
16
Project No.:
70217777C
q� �¢
SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake Count North Carolina
Y�
Date:yroFMpH,4°Q
February 2022

Overview of Site 31WA2456, facing West
Shovel Test d3 Profile
Archaeological Site Photographs: 31 WA2456
TIP No. HL-00081; Improvements to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
and SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road)
Wake County, North Carolina
Project:
70217777C
Date:
Feb 2022
Drwn/Chkd:
MM/TR
Figure:
17

Project Tracking No.
21-os-000s
Resubmit
N O ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
4
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this
o
project. It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must
T �'
consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.
4�
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No
Federal Aid No:
HL-0008I
493 67.1.9
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document
Funding:
❑ Yes ® No
Wake
Federal CE
❑ State
Permit Type.
® Federal
NIA
Project Description: The project involves the widening of Old Stage Road from Rocky Service
Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake County, North Carolina. The archaeological
APE corresponds with the overall project study area as depicted on the attached study area maps.
It encompasses nearly 50 acres of area.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input
required by state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review"
form, the project is federally funded with no federal permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act will apply and the Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) will
serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction design and other data was examined (when
applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces embracing
the project locale. The archaeological APE encompasses all areas of potential ground disturbing
activity.
Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted utilizing on-line
resources provided to the NCDOT by the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, November
29, 2022. During the intial survey work for the project, two new archaeological sites (31 WA2455 &
31 WA2456) were recorded and one previously documented archaeological site, 31 WA 1995, was
revisited within the original APE boundaries. Since the limits of the APE have expanded since the
archaeological survey work, a small cemetery (31 WA2457) is now within the project APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally
Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources
available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic
occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these mapped
resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing archaeological
components are situated within the APE. In addition, historic maps of Wake County were appraised
to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other confirmation of historic
occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as
well. In general, the cultural background review established that the project APE had already been
surveyed for archaeological resources. Based on cultural -historical factors, the APE is considered to
have a high potential for the documentation of archaeological resources.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTARCHAEOLOGY ThAM "NO ARCHA601.OGICAL SURVEY REQUIREIJ" FORM
1 of 2

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
Resubmit
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to
evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that
may have resulted in past occupation at this location. Aerial and on -ground photographs (NCDOT
Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map application (when amenable) were also
examined/utilized for additional assessment of disturbances, both natural and human induced, which
compromise the integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a
heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
(This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the following federally recognized
tribes have expressed an interest: Catawba. We recommend that you ensure that this
documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process described in the current NCDOT
Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.)
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably
predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The entire APE has been previously inspected and surveyed for archaeological resources.
Therefore, additional shovel testing of this area would be redundant. However, a small cemetery
recorded during the last survey is now located within the new APE boundaries. This resource is
not eligible for listing on the NRHP and is not considered significant. In any event, this cemetery
location should be avoided during construction activities. There is a high liklihood of the resource
containing unmarked gravesites. If avoidance is not possible, the graves will need to be removed
and relocated under state laws. There are no existing NRHP eligible archaeological sites within
the projects APE, and it is unlikely to contain significant, intact, and preserved archaeological
deposits. As currently proposed as a federally funded project, no further consultation is advocated.
A finding of "no archaeological survey required" is considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST: NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
Scott Halvorsen � l/�l
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST lI
Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENTARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY RFQUIRFD" FORM
2 of 2

Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Future 1-540 Alignment
ren Zell Rd
flanks R� a
C
m
C
LL
G,c
?j
"to of
5toue Iiui
Garneri,,,f ,- 4L
glagacr�s�a
b
n�
rn
a
� b
b �
Q
L
O
(d
c�
u
rr
q6tp;t6have111), o
e,doltr p` u
TUrrroT� N
a
sJ�
y
0
�r
a
a
R
V
L r pi
Harvey Jd�itis� Rd N
Rd
as
o�
0 0.5 1 U
a
L
Miles rf
Ka VICINITY MAP County: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
DEPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) Div: 5 STIPl�HL-UOOBI 9
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WBS: 49367.1.9
NOORTHRTH CAROILINA
EhTos ° COUNTY Date: OCTOBER2022

Legend
d4 s,
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Parcel Boundary
,41
�,{j[ ►
Banks
r
Id (�
0 500 1,000 41
Feet ��� ';,±#,!l o� 44 1 !
xonrM STUDY AREA MAP County: WAKE
ht� NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
4 DEPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) Div: 5 STiP#HL-0008i 9
$ OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR WBS: 49367.1.9
a DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~,�xr WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date: OCTOBER 2022

Historic Architecture

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-08-0005
bf 0, HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0008I
County:
Wake
WBS No.:
49367.1.9
Document
Federal CE
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
State X Federal
Federal
X Yes No
Permit
USACE
Permits):
I To e(s):
Project Description: Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service
Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) (no off -site detour specified in
review request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEWACTIVLTIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 17 August
2021 and yielded one SL, eight SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in the Area of Potential
Effects (APE). Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information
indicated a partly developed APE of cultivated fields and mostly residential and several
commercial and church resources dating between the 1890s to the 2020s (viewed 17 August
2021). Eighteen pre-1970 resources (about one third of the total) are unexceptional (many are
also altered) examples of their types. Included in the pre-1970 group are nine previously
recorded resources determined not NR-eligible for the R-2721 project in 2012, and all the
findings remain valid: seven Houses (WA5719, 5721-5, 6372, and 6374, and the B. N. Ferrell
House (WA1214). A cemetery is located on the parcel in the NW quadrant of the Banks
Road/Old Stage Road intersection, but is well outside the APE and beyond likely project impact.
Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the absence of critical architectural and landscape
resources in the APE (viewed 17 August 2021).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORICARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THEPROJECTAREA: APE equates with the study area provided in the review request (see
attached). The county architectural surveys (1988-91 and 2005-6) and related publication, as
well as later studies, recorded no properties in the APE apart from those noted above (Kelly Lally,
The Historic Architecture of Wake County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government, 1994)). County
GIS/tax materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural and
landscape resources. No National Register -listed properties are located within the APE.
Should the project design change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be required.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
1Q Au ust 2021
NCDOT Architectural Historian
9
Date
❑Design Plans
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

U Project Loca ion
s
3 L
w. r
■S
1
pioHct Vicinir k1n:� _ -...�. _ � �••
RLLOV8'
OW Stop Road (SR ' 006) at R"k N
Sonic@ Stenos Rood (SR 27361.
NSden Old ; tagd Hoed from A"k 'ry
Service Stevan Recta :a Railing
Aleadows Pave Fa•..e yrr ...
w
Wake coun!y
a •1r � �~h
i!. ■nwk
Pro Get Study A'ea
HL-00081 SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) Widening Wake C o u my
WBS No. 49367.1.9 Base maps: HPOWeb, NCDOT, nts
N CQOT — H i sto r i c Arch i tectu re
August 2021
PA Tracki ng No. 21-08-0005
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

Area of Potential Effects (APE)
HL-00081 SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) Widening Wake County
N CDOT — H i sWr i s Architecture
August 2021
PA Tracki ng No. 21-08-0005
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEPREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

r
1J
v
LO
N
F
II
dK a
a L
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-08-0005
Revised
� f 0, HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form supercedes that dated 19 August 2021
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0008I
County:
Wake
WBSNo.:
49367.1.9
Document
Federal CE
T e:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
State X Federal
Federal
Yes X No
Permit
Permits):
I Typ e(s):
Project Description: Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service
Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) (no off -site detour specified in
review request). Study area revision, October 2022.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIFTIoNOFREVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 17 August
2021 and 17 November 2022 and yielded one SL, eight SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in
the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography,
and tax information indicated a partly developed APE of cultivated fields and mostly residential
and several commercial and church resources dating between the 1890s to the 2020s (viewed
17 August 2021 and 17 November 2022). Eighteen pre-1970 resources (about one third of the
total) are unexceptional (many are also altered) examples of their types. Included in the pre-
1970 group are nine previously recorded resources determined not NR-eligible for the R-2721
project in 2012, and all the findings remain valid: seven Houses (WA5719, 5721-5, 6372, and
6374, and the B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214). The Banks Cemetery, located on a small parcel in
the NW quadrant of the Banks Road/Old Stage Road intersection (PIN: 0698773062), is not NR-
eligible, but should be afforded the usual protections during construction. Google Maps "Street
View" confirmed the absence of critical architectural and landscape resources in the APE
(viewed 17 August 2021 and 17 November 2022). The original finding of "no survey required"
remains valid.
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLYPREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THEPROJECTAREA: APE equates with the study area provided in the review request (see
attached). The county architectural surveys (1988-91 and 2005-6) and related publication, as
well as later studies, recorded no properties in the APE apart from those noted above (Kelly Lally,
The Historic Architecture of Wake County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government, 1994)). County
GIS/tax materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural and
landscape resources. No National Register -listed properties are located within the APE.
Should the project design change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be required.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
18 November 2022
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Future 1.540 Alignment
Ten ;en Fd
q
b
O
Gamer " ❑r i
Seattone St glage�e*��
y.,
� N
r
Y
V
b
�p�ldhaven ❑, �
n
da" ID'
N
O
at
t
a
H
'sp
f
3
6
n
n ISM
7
a a
Y
r
Haney ��nson Rd
� ' Rd
c�
y�
n
0 0.5 1
`Y
7
Miles tt o
VICINITY MAP County: WNCE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD ZSR 1006) Figure
DEPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) ❑w. s sTIPIFHL-0OOBI
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR Yygs: asasT.ts
.Q DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .1
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date: OCTOAFR M22
Historic Architecture andLandscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

IN •.+, � a r � Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Parcel Boundary
14
• � f 'f
Y
Tam—` �..
r: A ABankslRJsi>ia
r{ �
f Back FtiiieiC.f?d ��
tT
kk
A
y.. S,• Y .
O�
0 500 1-000 '
Feet
STUDY AREA MAP Cv�ry. WAKE
h V, NORTH
WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006)
aEPARTMENT AROLINA FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION Rp (SR 2736f D- 5 STINHL-0"1 Figure
hEPAFlT
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WB$: 49367.1.9
WAKE COUNTY
M 2
NORTH CAROLINA Date: OCTOBE R 2
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-08-0005
Revised #2
�t HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
a "SURVEY REQUIRED FORM"
This form supercedes those dated 18 November 2022 and 19 August 2021
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0008I
County:
Wake
WBSNo.:
49367.1.9
Document
Federal CE
T e:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
❑ State X Federal
Federal
Yes X No
Permit
Permits):
T e(s):
Project Description: Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service
Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive (no off -site detour specified in review
request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 17 August
2021 and 17 November 2022 and yielded one SL, eight SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in
the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography,
and tax information indicated a partly developed APE of cultivated fields and mostly residential
and several commercial and church resources dating between the 1890s to the 2020s (viewed
17 August 2021 and 17 November 2022). Eighteen pre-1970 resources (about one third of the
total) are unexceptional (many are also altered) examples of their types. Included in the pre-
1970 group are nine previously recorded resources determined not NR-eligible for the R-2721
project in 2012, and the findings for eight Houses (WA5719, WA5721 thru 5725, WA6372, and
WA6374) remain valid. The B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214), while study -listed in 1991 as a result
of the comprehensive county survey (1988-91), has not received the full evaluation for National
Register eligibility required for project compliance purposes. The Banks Cemetery, located on a
small parcel in the NW quadrant of the Banks Road/Old Stage Road intersection (PIN:
0698773062), is not NR-eligible, but should be afforded the usual protections during
construction.
The county architectural surveys (1988-91 and 2005-6) and related publication, as well as later
studies, recorded the properties in the APE noted above (Kelly Lally, The Historic Architecture of Wake
County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government, 1994)). County GIS/tax materials and other
visuals, like Google Maps "Streetview," clearly illustrate the relative placement of the resources
and the proposed work and indicate the need for field investigation and eligibility evaluation of
the B. N. Ferrell House property. The project is subject to compliance with both GS 121-12(a)
and Section 106.
We can complete this in vestigation using one of the Historic Architecture Team's on -call firms, or if Division
would like to manage and complete the work they can use an NCDOT-prequalified architectural historian
under contract with one of Division's on -call firms Historic Architecture will provide a scope of work for the
Division to use, but we do need to know within seven days which path the Division plans to follow.
All work products produced by the Division's consultant must be submitted to the
Historic Architecture Team for review, acceptance, and submittal to the State Historic Preservation Office
as per the Programmatic Agreement.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualzfied in the 2007 Programmatic .agreement.
Page 1 of 5

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- "SURVEY REQUIRED"
r
44
NCDOT Architectural Historian
❑Design Plans
19 December 2022
Date
HL-0008I. Wake County
Tracking No. 21-08-0005
Page 2 of 2
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 5

Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Future 1-540 Alignment
Fuquay yarina
r
r
�r
,0,., Rd
Ten tan {ld
a`
e 5t S ta9ecl as%
s N
e:
C7
R
rn
a
x
Nd 4
s
a
n
a
n �sR.
z
R �
Harvey 3drknson Rd
a
C
4
u
0 0.5 1 �, a
`v
7
Miles x o
n * VICINITY MAP County: WAKE
NORTHCAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
DEPARTMENT
FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) ok. s STIPlFHL-0OOBI
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WEIS: 49367-1.9
WAKE COUNTY
�*T o. 'n•� NORTH CAROLINA Date: OCTOeF R 2a2z
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 5

. �'• i�*
Legend
rx0.
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Parcel Boundary
'r
t
L
+
l` >4—69W
tiw
aBa�iks
J
• r
•
f
Back FIe
IR
• � rl' � � � i. F
s
a 500 1,000
Feet
STUDY AREA MAP couay: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
MPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) D.. 5 1 STIPVHL-00081
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY
WBS: 49367-1.5
.,, a,a,
71- NORTH CAROLINAROLINA DZiC: OCTOBER 2Q22
Historic Architecture andLandscapes SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 4 of 5

Property to be Evaluated
HL-00081, Wake County Base map: Wake County current GIS, nts
1. B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214 — SL). #10133 Old Stage Road.
PIN: 0698862235.
NLDOT — HlstoricArc h1tefture
December 2022
PA Tracki ng No. 2I-08-0005
Historic Architecture and Landscapes SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 5 of 5

Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive)
Wake County, North Carolina
TIP No.: HL-0008I WBS No.: 49367.1.1 PA Tracking No. 21-08-0005
Prepared for:
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Prepared by:
MdM Historical Consultants Inc.
Post Office Box 1399
Durham, NC 27702
919.368.1602
April 5, 2023

Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive)
Wake County, North Carolina
TIP No.: HL-0008I WBS No.: 49367.1.1 PA Tracking No. 21-08-0005
Prepared for:
Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Prepared by:
MdM Historical Consultants Inc.
Post Office Box 1399
Durham, NC 27702
919.368.1602
April 5, 2023
Jennifer F. Martin, Principal Investigator Date
MdM Historical Consultants Inc.
Mary Pope Furr, Supervisor Date
Historic Architecture Team
North Carolina Department of Transportation

Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road)
from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive)
Wake County, North Carolina
TIP No.: HL-0008I WBS No.: 49367.1.1 PA Tracking No. 21-08-0005
Management Summary
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen SR 1006 (Old
Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) in
Wake County, North Carolina. This project is subject to review under the Section 106
Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects
(NCDOT/NCHPO/FHWA/USACE/USFS 2020).
An NCDOT architectural historian defined an Area of Potential Effects (APE) and identified
and assessed all resources approximately fifty years of age or more within the APE. Following
this initial review, NCDOT staff identified one resource within the APE that warranted an
intensive evaluation of individual eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP). They determined that all other properties are not worthy of further study and
evaluation due to lack of historical significance and/or integrity. NCDOT requested MdM
Historical Consultants (MdM) evaluate the NRHP eligibility of the Stephens on- Sauls House
(WA8812) at 10133 Old Stage Road southeast of Garner in rural Wake County, North Carolina.
As part of the project, MdM intensively evaluated the property and provided a written report
that included photographs of the resource and landscapes; an historic and architectural
context; an evaluation of NRHP eligibility; comparisons to similar types of resources; and
carefully delineated and justified NRHP boundaries, as appropriate.
In February and March 2023, architectural historian and principal investigator Jennifer F.
Martin conducted fieldwork and research then authored this report. The table below
identifies the resource evaluated and summarizes the recommendations regarding its
eligibility.
This eligibility study confirms to the Historic Architecture Group Procedures and Work
Products (NCDOT 2015) and Report Standards for Historic Structures Survey
Reports/Determinations of Eligibility/Section 1061110 Compliance Reports in North Carolina
(NCHPO 2021). This report is on file at NCDOT and NCHPO and is available for review by the
general public.
Property Name and Survey Site
Address, PIN, and Parcel Number
NRHP Eligibility Recommendation
Number
and Criteria
Stephens on- Sauls House
10133 Old Stage Road
Recommended not eligible under
WA8812
0698862235/
any criteria
0483885
2
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Management Summary 2
I. Project Description and Methodology 4
II. Property Description and Evaluation: 8
Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812)
III. Bibliography 30
Stephens on-Sauls House, view from Old Stage Road to the east-southeast
3
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

I. Project Description and Methodology
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen SR 1006 (Old
Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) in
Wake County, North Carolina. The project area is located within Wake County, North Carolina.
The TIP number is TIP No. is HL-0008I, the WBS No. is 49367.1.1, and the PA Tracking No. is
21-08-0005.
An NCDOT architectural historian defined an Area of Potential Effects (APE) and identified
and assessed all resources of approximately fifty years of age or more within the APE.
Following this initial survey, NCDOT staff identified the Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812) as
warranting an intensive evaluation of its individual eligibility for the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP). They determined that all other properties in the APE are not worthy
of further study and evaluation due to lack of historical significance and/or integrity.
This project is subject to review under the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement for Minor
Transportation Projects (NCDOT/NCHPO/FHWA/USACE/USFS 2020). This eligibility study
was carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Secretary of the Interior's standards
and Guidelines for Archaeological and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716); 36 CFR Part 60;
36 CFR Part 800; and Historic Architecture Group Procedures and Work Products (NCDOT
2015) and Report Standards for Historic Structures Survey Reports/Determinations of
Eligibility/Section 1061110 Compliance Reports in North Carolina (NCHPO 2021). This
evaluation meets the guidelines of NCDOT, NCHPO, and the National Park Service.
In order to meet the requirements of the above laws, regulations, and guidelines, the work
plan for the evaluation of the Stephens on- Sauls House (WA8812) included the following
items: (1) conducting general historical and architectural background research in order to
develop contexts within which to evaluate the potential National Register eligibility of the
resource located within the APE; (2) field investigation on the resource and similar
properties; (3) specific historical and architectural research on the resource; and (4)
preparation of a report developed pursuant to the above -referenced laws, regulations and
guidelines. The report is on file at NCDOT and NCHPO and is available for review by the
general public.
In February and March 2023, MdM evaluated the Stephenson- Sauls House (WA8812) as
required, in compliance with the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, other state and federal regulations, and NCDOT's and
NCHPO's guidelines and standards. As part of the project, MdM evaluated the Stephenson-
Sauls House (WA8812) and provided a written report that included photographs of the
landscapes and buildings; historic and architectural contexts; evaluations of NRHP eligibility;
comparisons to similar types of resources; and carefully delineated and justified NRHP
boundaries, as appropriate.
0
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

MdM project manager and architectural historian Jennifer F. Martin, who meets the Secretary
of Interior's qualifications for architectural history (CFR 36 CFR Part 61), conducted the
fieldwork and research, analyzed the resource, and drafted this report in February and March
2023. As part of this effort, she sent a letter to the property owners informing them of the
project and her planned site visit. On FebruarylS, 2023, she visited the Stephenson- Sauls
House (WA8812), met with the owners, Amy and John Bynum, and toured the property. She
gathered history on the house and farm from Ms. Bynum and photographed the site, house
exterior, and house interior. Ms. Martin visited and documented comparable resources in
Wake County to provide context for the evaluation of the Stephenson- Sauls House. The
property owner, Amy Bynum, provided Ms. Martin with extensive historical information
about the Stephenson, Sauls, and Baker families. Ms. Martin reviewed deeds and other
documents on the Wake County Register of Deeds website. With permission of the United
States Department of Agriculture, Ms. Martin reviewed North Carolina Farm Census reports
for Wake County.
Stephenson-Sauls Farm in the early 1960s. The two tobacco barns and looping shed are no longer standing. The small ranch
house to the left is on a separate parcel. View to the east, photo courtesy of Amy Baker Bynum
The project to widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service Station Road) to
SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) is located within Wake County. Its project area and location
of the evaluated resource, the Stephens on- Sauls House (WA8812), are depicted on the
following maps.
5
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Future 1-540 Alignment
Fuquay-,Varna
r ren `cn {iA
Rd
5,nks Rd Y
c
C.,
Garner I ,
'rn
Sr�yecre5t`-
s*
s •N
a
R �
N �
t;
i
n
4,oadhitienQ� �
[P
T
rc,l
4
D�
Ra
a
Il
C
s
a
Hsrrey l,pnson Rd
s•
d➢�
n'p
� Rct
,�6
rc
ro
r
0 0.5 1 N
u
Miles x
�4
*m-
VICINITY MAP i wnty. WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
DEPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) DN: 5 STOF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WB$" d8367.1,9
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date- OCTpBER 2022
I
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

K
i
-a►
A�. Legend
5 �* • �! CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area/
Area of Potential Effects
Parcel Boundary
of Potential Effects
w _
' 4
� Step henson-$aids House property boundary
P. or
_10
s
n
_ Slagelin`e'xr y; v��! `� 1 r f•
0 500 1.00o
Feet►, y ,
rl_�"�"ORTH
STUDY AREA MAP County. WAKE
CAROUNA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 10061 Figure
DEPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RE)(SR 2736) ON- 5 STIPOHL-0 W
• OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING, MEADOWS DR WBS. 4936y.t9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Gate DCTOBER 2022
7
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC
_rl
s �r�
J

II. Property Description and Evaluation
Resource Name
Ste henson-Sauls House
HPO Survey Site Number
WA8812
Location
10133 Old Stage Road, Garner vic.
PIN Parcel Number
0698862235 0483885
Construction Date
Ca. 1910
Recommendation
Recommended not eligible under any criteria
House facade view to the east-northeast
Setting
The Stephens on- Sauls House stands in a rural but rapidly developing area approximately
seven miles south-southwest of the town of Garner in Wake County. Occupying an 8.67-acre
mostly level parcel, the house faces west toward Old Stage Road (SR 1006), just north of its
junction with Rock Service Station Road (SR2736). Back Field Road, a recently created private
dirt lane originating on the east side of Rock Service Station Road, parallels the parcel's
southern boundary as it proceeds to the east. The farm's layout is typical of rural Wake County
with the house standing on the westernmost third of the parcel approximately thirty yards
from right-of-way for Old Stage Road. Its attendant outbuildings, flanking both sides of an
unpaved driveway, spread out behind the house. Behind the outbuildings to the east, a four -
acre farm field lies at the middle of the property, while a thick line of trees covering about two
acres serves as the eastern border.
8
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

•r
y
Stage Road
Gambrel roof barn
child's playhouse
r' prefab carport
k - 1�Ooa43 PB°94 �d
` modern storage building
�, � � Property line
(Rock Service Station Roadl
Site plan, created from iMaps Wake County GIS application
Description
The one-story, single -pile, side -gabled frame house featuring a centered front gable with a
diamond -shaped vent —a house form commonly referred to as a triple -A —faces west toward
Old Stage Road. The dwelling stands on a
mom concrete block foundation, includes two interior
4°`ri"1 brick chimneys, and is crowned with modern
metal roofing. The exterior has been altered
} with the application of aluminum siding and the
i replacement of the original front porch posts
with square posts. Most of the original window
'f openings have been reduced in size to
accommodate new sash.
Gloria Sauls Baker and Charles Baker in front of the house
in 1961, note original porch posts, courtesy of Amy Baker
Bynum
The dwelling's original form consisted of the
side -gabled front block with a rear shed room
and a gabled rear ell with a south elevation
porch. In the early -to -mid -twentieth century, a
gabled kitchen dependency was connected to
the rear ell and the ell's porch enclosed. Over
time, the house was further expanded with a
0
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

rear porch that was later enclosed. The house's evolution illustrates a typical method farm
families used in the early and mid -twentieth centuries to expand their living spaces to
accommodate growing families.
Photo showing original porch posts and full-size windows, view to the east, date unknown, courtesy of Amy Baker Bynum
At the facade, a hipped -roof porch with replacement square posts shelters a center entrance
with paneled wood and half -glazed sidelights flanking a replacement front door. Single
windows pierce the facade on each side of the door. Both window openings have been
truncated and fitted with new sash
Gloria Baker Sauls at backdoor, view to the northwest, circa 1960, courtesy
of Amy Baker Bynum
that are smaller than the original.
The north elevation includes a
multi-lite window corresponding
to the location of a bathroom and a
small, enclosed porch topped with
a shed roof and fitted with a storm
door. Windows on the south
elevation have also been truncated
and sash have been replaced. An
enclosed porch and small
mudroom extend along the rear
elevation. Both are sheathed in
vinyl siding.
10
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

The interior is organized around a central passage. The parlor north of the passage retains a
handcrafted mantel enlivened with geometric elements including diamonds and squares
constructed from wood moulding and a sawtooth band spanning the facing over the firebox.
According to the property owner, her great grandfather, James A. Stephenson, built the
mantle. Other original elements in the main block include a batten door with a box lock
leading to the rear shed room, oak flooring, and five -panel wood doors. Ceiling and wall are
not original. The historic kitchen, which was likely originally a free-standing building,
contained two rooms. The center wall has been removed to create an open kitchen/dining
room space.
Stephenson-Sauls House and farm shown on 1959 Wake County aerial photograph, USDA Historical Aerial Photos, GIS
Services, UNC Libraries, web.lib.unc.edu
11
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Outbuildings
Barn
Circa 1910
The gambrel -roofed barn with metal siding stands northeast of the house. The current owners
report that the barn was used as a tobacco pack house and contained an ordering pit on the
bottom level. The building stands on concrete block piers and includes an open -sided storage
sheds on the east and north elevations.
Garage
Circa 1965
A one-story, gable -roofed garage with vinyl siding stands between the house and the barn.
Sliding wood doors extend along a portion of the facade (south elevation). A small prefab shed
stands on its east side.
Well shelter
Early twentieth century
Just to the north of the house stands a pyramidal -roofed, open -sided structure built of vertical
log supports with wood railings. The structure, which rests on a concrete slab, originally
sheltered a well.
Playhouse
Circa 2000
A diminutive Queen Anne -style playhouse stands behind the house.
Prefabricated carport
Circa 2000
A metal -roofed, open -sided carport is east of the house and south of the playhouse.
Storage building/office
Ca. 2010
A front -gabled building with vinyl siding and resting on concrete block foundation piers
stands southeast of the house.
12
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Front of the house, view to the east
North (side) elevation, view to the south
13
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

AWA6-

shed room, view to the west-southwest; bottom: mantle made by J. A. Stephenson in front parlor, view to
the east
15
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Pr
j I
Kitchen, view to the south
Gambrel barn, view to the northeast
16
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

_ —
�P iZ Y H
W h S-hT f aMcs � sv6' -4

Playhouse view to the east-southeast
Carport, view to the east
M
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Historical Background
On December 26, 1910, Lula Jewell Myatt and Thomas M. Myatt sold the house and 101 acres
in Panther Branch Township to Mary Frances Wilson Stephenson (1883-1960) and James
Addison (J. A.) Stephenson (1875-1964).1 The Stephensons married in 1903, and before their
purchase of the property, they lived in a rented house on Raleigh Road in Middle Creek
Township near Fuquay-Varina.z The couple had seven children and established a homeplace
that would be enjoyed by four generations.3
Although the property Mary and J. A. Stephenson purchased in the early -twentieth century no
longer functions as a working
farm, its origins and subsequent
story are firmly tied to the history
of agriculture in this part of Wake
County. In addition to family oral
tradition, the understanding of
the history of agriculture in the
county is enhanced by the records
of the North Carolina Department
of Agriculture Statistics Division.
Between 1918 and 1948, the
Division produced a farm census
for each year between 1918 and
1948 for individual farm owners
using their property tax data. The
North Carolina State Archives
retains only a few years of these
records, namely 1925, 1935, and
1945. Most of the remaining years
have been destroyed according to
State Archives retention
schedules.4
rviaiy ridiirc�, aiiu Jauic�, t UUnUii t). ti.) OLUPHUInUll, uaLc U11A11Uvvii, wui Lc�,y
of Amy Baker Bynum
'Wake County Deed Book 253, page 140, dated December 26, 1910; the current owner believes the house was
standing when her great grandparents, the Stephensons, bought the property.
Z 1910 United States Federal Census, Middle Creek, Wake County, North Carolina.
3 "James A. Stephenson," obituary, (Raleigh) News and Observer, October 9, 1964, page 8.
4 North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1925, 1935, and 1945,
North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina (note: these records are not available without permission
of the Statistics Division). A contemporaneous overview of the farm census is provided in North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture, "North Carolina Farm Forecaster, Crop
and Livestock Report for North Carolina," December 1928 p. 10, North Carolina Digital Collections,
digital.ncdcr.gov.
19
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

The 1925 farm census does not include J. A. Stephenson in its information for Panther Branch
Township. While the census provides useful data about the output and character of individual
farms in the first half of the twentieth century, the accuracy and thoroughness of the
information varies considerably depending on the township, the period when the data was
collected, and the individual tax office employees compiling the data.
Although the farm census cannot shed light on J. A. Stephenson's farming activities in 1925, it
can provide information about farm size, crops, livestock, and tenancy in Panther Branch
Township. That year, the census recorded 189 farms with fifty embracing 101 acres or more.
Cotton, produced on over three thousand acres, covered more land than any other crop,
followed by corn, which grew on a little over two thousand acres. Tobacco covered 658 acres.
Truck crops, which could be sold at market in downtown Raleigh, occupied a little over 235
acres and did not represent a major cash crop. A total of 891 pecan trees stood in the
township.5
Crop production in Panther Branch Township reflected agricultural production in the county.
In 1927, cotton, grown on 57,603 acres, covered more land area than any other crop, followed
by corn (49,046 acres) and tobacco (32,708 acres). A total of 5,545 acres in Wake County
yielded truck crops including Irish and sweet potatoes.6
According to the 1925 farm census, four farms were of comparable size to the 101-acre
Stephenson farm and only one, the John W. Pagan farm, grew tobacco. The four farms
produced cotton, corn, and truck crops including melons, berries, and potatoes. The W. A.
Goodson farm, owned by a Black farmer, was the only 100-acre farm in the township that did
not have a tenant.?
The Mary and J. A. Stephenson farm appears in the 1935 farm census report with thirty-two
acres worked by the family and twenty acres worked by tenants. The rest of the acreage was
idle (four acres) or categorized as non -farmland (thirty-four acres). Seventeen acres of
farmland was devoted to tobacco, sixteen acres to corn, and eight acres to cotton. Another
sixteen acres yielded hay, a crop that promoted soil conservation and whose production
expanded in North Carolina in the mid-1930s. Irish and sweet potatoes grew on less than two
acres with another two acres set aside for other commercial truck crops, such as vegetables
sold at market. In the mid-1930s, the Stephensons tended to twenty-five fruit trees, most
6 North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1925, North Carolina
State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina.
6 North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture, "North Carolina Farm
Forecaster, Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina," December 1928 p. 8-9, North Carolina Digital
Collections, digital.ncdcr.gov.
7 North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1925, North Carolina
State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina.
20
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

likely apple, peach, or pear trees, which were most common in the 1930s in North Carolina.
Their livestock included just four horses or mules and three milk cows.8
Tenants farmed more acres in Wake County in the mid-1930s than did owners. In 1934,
tenants worked over 72,000 acres in the county, while owners tended to 58,533 acres.9 The
population census provides clues to the presence of tenants on the Stephenson farm. In 1930,
the Stephenson family included eight members and by 1940, that number had decreased to
five. The 1935 farm census report documented eleven people living on the farm indicating
tenant farmers likely occupied the property.
Mary Frances Stephenson, date unknown, courtesy of Amy Baker
Bynum
The farm census report provides an
overview of the size and output of farms
in Panther Branch Township in 1935. The
report documented 301 farms, including
five corporate farms. Sixty-two farms
were larger than the Stephenson's 101-
acre tract. The crop that covered more
acreage than any other was corn, which
grew on 3,000 acres in the township.
Tobacco grew on 2,101 acres while
cotton grew on 1,341 acres. A little over
600 acres was devoted to truck crops
including sweet potatoes, which grew on
almost 200 acres. Like the Stephensons,
most farmers had fruit trees. The 1935
farm census report indicates 5,680 apple,
pear, or peach trees in Panther Branch
township.lo
Four other farms in the township
contained approximately one hundred
acres and, like the Stephenson farm,
produced corn, tobacco, cotton, hay, and
fewer than five acres of truck crops. All
8 North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1935, North Carolina
State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina; North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department
of Agriculture, "Farm Forecaster: Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina, November 1937," page 22, North
Carolina Digital Collections, digital.ncdcr.gov.
9 North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture, "Farm Forecaster: Crop
and Livestock Report for North Carolina, February 1935," page 10-11, North Carolina Digital Collections,
digital.ncdcr.gov.
io North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1935, North Carolina
State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina.
21
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

these farms, like most farms of the period, used tons of fertilizer to boost production."
As the state emerged from the Great Depression, farmers in Panther Branch Township and
elsewhere in Wake County, concentrated on crops that possessed the most value. In 1936,
tobacco reigned as the most valuable commodity, followed by cotton, corn, and commercial
truck crops. Apples and peaches together earned almost six million dollars across the state in
1936.12
The last available farm census reports,
which date to 1945, indicate that J. A.
Stephenson, who was in his early 70s, had
practically stopped farming and given
over most of his acreage to a tenant or
tenants. In 1946, one of those tenants, J. M.
Stevens, faced charges of assault against
Stephenson over a disagreement over the
tobacco crop on the farm.13 Stephenson's
tenants farmed sixty-eight acres of the
101-acre farm, while woodland or other
non -farmland occupied twenty-seven
acres. Corn (25 acres), tobacco (15 acres),
and cotton (5 acres) remained the
principal crops. The home garden took up
one acre and twelve fruit trees remained.
In the mid-1940s, the Stephenson's
chicken flock included seventy-five hens.14
The 1945 farm census for Panther Branch
Township recorded approximately 400
farms. Sixty of those, including Mary and J.
A. Stephenson's farm, contained one
hundred acres or more. Seven farms in the J. A. Stephenson, date unknown, courtesy of Amy Baker Bynum
township contained 100 acres, plus or
minus five acres. Tenants worked at least
half the acreage on all seven farms and each farm grew corn, cotton, and tobacco and
produced hay. Corn, grown on over three thousand acres, dominated the township's fields,
followed closely by tobacco, which covered over two thousand acres. As was typical for the
11 Ibid.
11 North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture, "Farm Forecaster:
Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina, November 1937," page 36, North Carolina Digital Collections,
digital.ncdcr.gov.
13 "A Plea Accepted," (Raleigh) News and Observer, September 6, 1946, page 14.
14 North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1945, North Carolina
State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina.
22
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

period, all the 100 acres farms included a home garden and most cultivated fruit trees. The
1945 farm census noted that nearly all farmers in the township practiced soil conservation
and improvement by plowing under a portion of their land or leaving it fallow. Copious
amounts of fertilizer continued in use.15
Not long after the 1945 farm census was taken,
Bernice Stephenson Sauls (1903-1997), the oldest
of Mary and James Stephenson's children, and her
husband, Simon Peter Sauls (1896-1953), acquired
41 3/4 acres of the family farm from her parents by
deed dated February 14, 1946. The sale included
the homeplace.16 Prior to the acquisition of her
parent's farm, Bernice Sauls and her husband were
tenants on the Sherriff N. F. Turner farm on Old
Smithfield Road.17
Bernice Stephenson Sauls, date unknown, courtesy of
Amy Baker Bynum
Simon Peter (S.P.) Sauls, like his wife, was
born and raised in Panther Branch Township.
After his service in the military in World War
I, the couple married in 1920 and went on to
have nine children.18 Bernice, S. P. and the
Sauls children continued the tradition of
farming established by Mary and J. A.
Stephenson. Their granddaughter, Amy Baker
Bynum, recalls the family grew tobacco and
truck crops.19 Tragically, S. P. Sauls died just
Simon Peter Sauls, date unknown, courtesy of Amy
Baker Bynum
is Ibid.
16 Wake County Deed Book 935, page 283, dated February 14, 1946.
17 1940 United States Federal Census, Panther Branch, Wake County, North Carolina; "They Come Double on
Farm in Wake," (Raleigh) News and Observer, March 30, 1942, page 10.
18 Gloria Sauls Baker, "Simon and Bernice Sauls Family," in The Heritage of Wake County (Winston-Salem: Hunter
Publishing, 1983), 466.
19 Amy Baker Bynum, interview with Jennifer Martin, February 15, 2023.
23
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

seven years after the couple acquired the farm,
leaving Bernice a widow for almost forty-five
years.20
In June 1971, Bernice Sauls deeded the property to
one of her daughters, Gloria Louise Sauls Baker
(1942-2017), and her husband, Charles Lee Baker
(1939-2018). The Bakers, who resided in the house
with Bernice Sauls, deeded a life estate back to her
so that the property passed to the Bakers upon her
death, which came in 1997. Gloria and Charles Baker
resided at the farm until their deaths in 2017 and
2018, respectively. The property then passed to
their daughter, Amy Baker Bynum, and her husband,
John Bynum. Amy Baker Bynum is the fourth
generation to own the property. The property is no
longer a farm. The house is leased to a family
member.
Bernice and Simon Peter Sauls, date unknown,
courtesy of Amy Baker Bynum
Architectural Context and Comparable
Properties in Wake County
The one-story, side -gabled, single -pile
frame house with a gabled rear ell was
a common vernacular form in Wake
County beginning in the late
nineteenth century. Likely inspired by
the picturesque mode made popular
by pattern books of the period, Charles and Gloria Baker, courtesy of Amy Baker Bynum
centered front gables began appearing
on this straightforward house form in the early decades of the twentieth century. The typically
three -bay, weatherboarded house with a front gable, often referred to as a "triple-A" for the
roof's three gable ends, nearly always follows a center hall plan with one room flanking each
side of the passage. A rear shed room and one-story ell, often with a porch along one side
20 North Carolina State Board of Health Certificate of Death, Simon P. Sauls, dated May 15, 1953, accessed on
ancestry.com.
24
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

elevation, expanded the family living
space. It was not uncommon that a free-
standing kitchen was later joined to the
house by incorporating it into the rear ell.
In her work, The Historic Architecture of
Wake County, North Carolina, historian
Kelly Malloy, nee Lally asserts "judging
from their prevalence on the landscape,
one- and two-story triple -A -roofed
dwellings were the most popular houses
among Wake County's turn -of -the -
century residents."21
The Morris House (WA0789) at 303 North Salem Street in Apex is a
typical triple-A house Although historic buildings, especially
farmhouses and outbuildings, are
threatened by intense development pressure taking place in southern Wake County, a
significant number of one-story, triple-A houses remain south of Raleigh due to their ubiquity
on the landscape in the early
twentieth century. The Morris House
(WA0789), located just north of
downtown Apex, is an intact and
unrestored example of a triple-A
house. The John H. and Nevada
Seagroves Farm (WA0676; Study List
1991, Apex Local Landmark 2011) at
1617 Ten Ten Road (also known as
Center Street) in Apex remains one of
the most intact one-story, triple -A -
roofed houses in the county. John H.
and Nevada Seagroves had the house John H. and Nevada Seagroves house facade, view to the north
built around 1910 on their ninety -
acre farm east of Apex. When
documented by historic Kelly Lally, the
house stood in what she identified as,
an unspoiled rural setting." Currently,
the house occupies less than one acre and contains a commercial office.
Despite its change in physical context,
the house retains its wraparound
porch and decorative shingled front
gable. Several historic, frame Outbuildings on the Seagroves farm, view to the northeast
"Kelly A. Lally, The Historic Architecture of Wake County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government,
1994), 105.
25
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

outbuildings, including a tobacco packhouse, a chicken house, and various sheds, accompany
the house. After donating an easement on the house to Capital Area Preservation (CAP) in
2007, the then -owner rehabilitated the house and outbuildings according to CAP standards.22
Like the Stephens on- Sauls
House, the Swannie and Arthur
Atkins House (WA1245) at 6524
Ten Ten Road near Garner is a
one-story, triple-A dwelling that
includes a weatherboard -sided
gambrel -roof barn. Atkins built
the barn sometime after 1937,
the year he and his wife bought
the property. Along with the
house and barn, several small
sheds stand on the 1.7-acre
parcel. The house, likely dating
to around 1905, displays
louvered diamond vents in its
gables, including on the gabled
ell, and cornice returns. Posts
supporting the hipped -roof
porch are likely replacements
but original two -over -two
windows remain. A porch on
the east side of the ell has been
enclosed. The Atkins family
grew tobacco and raised truck
crops they sold at the market in
Raleigh.23
The weatherboarded dwelling
on the Jones Family Farm24
(WA5734) at 10221 Jordan
Road near Garner retains
turned posts supporting a shed -
roofed front porch and diamond
Swannie and Arthur Atkins House, view to the south
Swannie and Arthur Atkins House, view to the north, photo from Realtor.com
vents in the gables. Windows are a mix of original and replacement sash. The porch along the
ell has been enclosed. Across Jordan Road stands a collection of frame tobacco barns, a
22 "Seagroves Farm," Capital Area Preservation website, capitalareapreservation.com.
23 Mattson and Alexander, "Historic Architectural Resources Survey Report: Complete 540-Triangle Expressway
Southeast Extension," for North Carolina Department of Transportation, November 2014, 383-391.
24 The Jones House was field -checked on February 14, 2023, but not photographed.
26
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

packhouse, and sheds originally associated with the house but now under separate
ownership.
National Register of Historic Places Evaluation
Integrity
The following provides an evaluation of the seven aspects of integrity for NRHP eligibility of
the Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812):
• Location: High
The Stephens on- Sauls House occupies its original acreage on the east side of Old Stage Road
just north of Rock Service Station Road and therefore retains its integrity of location.
• Setting: High
Agricultural land and outbuildings contribute to the house's rural setting. The area where the
house is located retains its pastoral character with expanses of open land unencumbered by
modern development. Therefore, the Stephenson-Sauls House retains its integrity of setting.
• Design: Low
The form and plan of the Stephenson-Sauls House has been altered but mostly at the rear
where porches have been enclosed and additions built. The center hall plan has been retained
on the interior of the main block. Changes to the materials and texture in the form of synthetic
siding, new windows, and porch alterations compromise the dwelling's integrity. Finally,
removal or concealment of original or early interior finishes on the walls and ceilings
negatively impacts its integrity of design.
• Materials: Low
Due to alterations occurring primarily in the late twentieth century, the Stephenson-Sauls
House does not retain its character -defining exterior materials, namely weatherboard siding,
windows, and the front porch elements. In addition, the integrity of materials on the interior
has been adversely impacted by removal or concealment of finishes on the walls and ceilings.
The removal or obscuring of original fabric has compromised the dwelling's integrity of
materials.
• Workmanship: Low
Because of alterations to the original appearance and materials of the Stephenson-Sauls
House, evidence of the workmanship employed to build the dwelling is no longer apparent.
27
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Changes to the original craftsmanship necessary to construct the house severely compromise
the house's ability to convey its integrity of workmanship.
• Feeling: Medium
The Stephens on- Sauls House remains in a rural setting like the surroundings that existed
during the property's historic period. Two tobacco barns linked by a looping shed are the
only major outbuildings that have been removed. The acreage's combination of cleared fields
and woodlands remains much as it was throughout the twentieth century.
• Association: Medium
The Stephens on- Sauls House retains its association with the Stephenson, Sauls, and Baker
families, whose descendant still owns and maintains the property. Changes to the house have
been made by several generations as they expanded and updated the dwelling to
accommodate a growing family and to keep up to date with changes in taste and the
availability of construction materials. Undoubtedly, the element of association is
compromised greatly by changes to the house's historic physical features and character.
Criterion A
The Stephens on- Sauls House is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A. To be eligible
under Criterion A, the property must retain integrity and be associated with a specific event
marking an important moment in American prehistory of history or a pattern of events or
historic trend that made a significant contribution to the development of a community, state,
or nation. Furthermore, the property must have existed at the time and be documented to be
associated with the events. Finally, the property's specific association must be important as
well.
The Stephens on- Sauls House is one of many early twentieth century triple-A houses with an
historic outbuilding remaining in rural Wake County. Other dwellings that have not been
significantly altered and retain their historic outbuildings better convey and illustrate major
trends in the history of agriculture in the county. Furthermore, the dwelling's lack of integrity
compromises its ability to convey significance under Criterion A.
Criterion B
The Stephens on- Sauls House is not recommended eligible for the NRHP under Criterion B as it
does not have any associations with any significant historical figure. For a property to be
eligible for significance under Criterion B, it must retain integrity and be associated with the
lives of persons significant in our past and be associated with a person's productive life,
reflecting the time period when that person achieved significance.
m
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Starting with Mary and J. A. Stephenson, owners, and occupants of the Stephenson-Sauls
house have farmed the land and served as productive members of the small rural agricultural
community outside Garner. However, no one associated with the house made the specific
types of contributions to local, state, or national history necessary for the property to qualify
for the NRHP under Criterion B.
Criterion C
The Stephens on- Sauls House is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C. For
a property to be eligible under this criterion, it must retain integrity and either embody
distinct characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, represent the work of a
master, possess high artistic value, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction.
The Stephens on- Sauls House represents an extremely popular house type built in southern
Wake County in the early -twentieth century. The house has undergone significant changes
including the application of synthetic siding, the replacement of its porch posts, the reduction
in size of the window openings, and the replacement of original sash. Several other examples
of one-story, single -pile, side -gable frame houses with decorative front gables stand in the
county. The early -twentieth-century gambrel roof barn standing behind the house remains
mostly intact, but numerous such barns still stand in the county.
Criterion D
The Stephens on- Sauls House is recommended not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion D. For
a property to be eligible under Criterion D, it must have or have had information to that
contributes to our understanding of human history or prehistory and the information must be
considered important.
The Stephens on- Sauls House is not eligible under Criterion D because it is not likely to yield
any new information pertaining to the history of building design or technology.
29
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

IV. Bibliography
1910 United States Federal Census. Middle Creek, Wake County, North Carolina.
1940 United States Federal Census, Panther Branch, Wake County, North Carolina
Baker, Gloria Sauls. "Simon and Bernice Sauls Family." In The Heritage of Wake County.
Winston-Salem: Hunter Publishing, 1983.
Bynum, Amy Baker. Interview with Jennifer F. Martin. February 14, 2023.
"James A. Stephenson" Obituary. (Raleigh) News and Observer, October 9, 1964, page 8.
Lally, Kelly A., The Historic Architecture of Wake County, North Carolina. Raleigh: Wake
County Government, 1994.
Mattson and Alexander. "Historic Architectural Resources Survey Report: Complete 540-
Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension." For North Carolina Department of
Transportation, November 2014.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture Statistics Division Farm Census Reports for 1925,
1935, and 1945. North Carolina State Archives, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture.
"North Carolina Farm Forecaster, Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina."
December 1928. North Carolina Digital Collections, digital.ncdcr.gov.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture.
"Farm Forecaster: Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina, February 1935."
North Carolina Digital Collections, digital. ncdcr.gov.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture.
"Farm Forecaster: Crop and Livestock Report for North Carolina, November 1937."
North Carolina Digital Collections, digital. ncdcr.gov.
North Carolina State Board of Health Certificate of Death. Simon P. Sauls. Dated May 15,
1953. Accessed on ancestry.com.
(Raleigh) News and Observer. Raleigh, North Carolina.
"Seagroves Farm." Capital Area Preservation website. Capitalareapreservation.com.
Wake County, North Carolina Deed Books. Wake County Register of Deeds Office. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
30
Historic Structures Survey Report
Widen Old Stage Road (SR1006), from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive (TIP No. HL-00081)
Wake County, NC

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-08-0005
Aim,
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0008I
County:
Wake
WBSNo.:
49367.1.9
Document
Federal CE
T e:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
State X Federal
Federal
Yes X No
Permit
Permits :
Typ e s :
Project Description: Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service
Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) (no off -site detour specified in
review request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register -listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area
of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
X There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 17 August 2021
and 17 November 2022 and yielded one SL, eight SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in the
Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE equates with the study area provided in the review
request (see attached), Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax
information indicated a partly developed APE of cultivated fields and mostly residential and
several commercial and church resources dating between the 1890s to the 2020s (viewed 17
August 2021 and 17 November 2022). Eighteen pre-1970 resources (about one third of the
total) are unexceptional (many are also altered) examples of their types. Included in the pre-
1970 group are nine previously recorded resources determined not NR-eligible for the R-2721
project in 2012, and the findings for eight Houses (WA5719, WA5721 thru 5725, WA6372, and
WA6374) remain valid. The Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812) (previously and erroneously
mapped as the B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214), now gone) had not received the full evaluation
for National Register eligibility required for project compliance purposes. The Banks Cemetery,
located on a small parcel in the NW quadrant of the Banks Road/Old Stage Road intersection
(PIN: 0698773062), is not NR-eligible, but should be afforded the usual protections during
construction.
The county architectural surveys (1988-91 and 2005-6) and related publication, as well as later
Historic Arch itechire and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 7

studies, recorded the properties in the APE noted above (Kelly Lally, The Historic Architecture of Wake
County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government, 1994)). County GIS/tax materials and other
visuals, like Google Maps "Streetview," clearly illustrated the relative placement of the resources
and the proposed work and indicated the need for field investigation and eligibility evaluation of
the Stephenson-Sauls House property.
NCDOT contracted with MdM Historical Consultants to carry out the necessary NR eligibility
evaluation. The resultant technical report (April 2023) concludes that the Stephenson-Sauls
House (WA8812) is not eligible for listing in the National Register. HPO has reviewed the study
and concurs with the finding (see attached correspondence).
As the evaluated property is found not NR-eligible and no additional resources of concern are
located in the APE, a finding of "no historic properties present or affected" will satisfy both
Section 106 and GS 121-12(a) compliance requirements.
Should any aspect of the project design change, please notify
NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessarv.
Technical report and photographs on file at
NCDOT — Historic Architecture and NCHPO and also Connect NCDOT
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos X Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OF AFFECTED
9 May 2023
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
HL-0008I, Wake County
WBS No. 49367.1.9
PA Tracking No. 21-08-0005
May 2023
Historic Arch itechire and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 7

Legend
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Future 1-540 Alignment
ruay-yarina
r
FF r
!r
'I", Rd
Ten tan {ld
a`
e 5t S ta9ecl as%
s N
r
e:
C7
R
rn
a
x
Nd 4
s
a
n
a
n �sR.
z
R �
Harvey 3drkmson Rd
a
C
4
u
0 0.5 1 �, a
`v
7
Miles x o
n * VICINITY MAP County: WAKE
NORTHCAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
DEPARTMENT
FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) ok. s STIPlFHL-0OOBI
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WEIS: 49367-1.9
WAKE COUNTY
�*T o. 'n•� NORTH CAROLINA Date: OCTOAF R 2a2z
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 7

. �'• i�*
Legend
rx0.
CAMPO Alternative
Project Study Area
Parcel Boundary
'r
t
L
+
l` >4—69W
tiw
aBa�iks
J
• r
•
f
Back FIe
IR
• � rl' � � � i. F
s
a 500 1,000
Feet
STUDY AREA MAP couay: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
MPARTMENT FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) D.. 5 1 STIPVHL-00081
OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY
WBS: 49367-1.5
771-
~
NORTH CAROLINAROLINA DaiC: OCTOBER 2022
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 4 of 7

Evaluated Resource
Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812)
#10133 Old Stage Road, PIN: 0698862235
HL-00081, Wake County Base map: current Wake County GIS, nts
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
May 2023
PA Tracking No- 21-08-OD05
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 5of7

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
X-nu" Nt- Harms, Atltn"gtrnt.x
Gkw.mw R.n• C A'P. r
Seetrran D. Reid @Ftii
May 8, 2023
MEMORANDUM
Of6re oCAmhhn and Ilim,"
17qMh• Scrreum, Uarin J. warcrc' PKfX
TO: Vanessa Patrick v2patrick(a;ncdot.gov
Environmental Analysis Unit
NCDOT Division of e T ,p Highways,
FROM: Renee Gledhill-Earlk�x-"
Environmental Review Coordinator
Q
SUBJECT: Historic Structures Survey Report, Widen SR 1006 Old Stage Road from SR 2736 Rock
Service Station Road to SR 3884 Rolling Meadows Drive, PA 21-08-0005, Wake County,
ER 23-0877
Thank you for your April 11, 2023, memorandum transmitting the Historic Structures Survey Report for
the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the report and concur that the Stephenson-Sauls
House (WA8812) is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under any criteria.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewCd.ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
CC. Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
mpfurr0mcdot.gov
r.ncanm: ]�F� F-ast]n�x titmt, Raley}A Tit: 2'. G[]l NSailin� Addrew><: 4�17 A[a,l Scnxr: f:enrcr, Ra]riRli'ti[: �74Y7-4f+1- 7e1ep1twnelFas j`]]l) Ki4�5'�IlKii-�>it71S
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 6 of 7

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy CooPER
C'r . .
Memorandum
To- Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
From: Vanessa E. Patrick
Architectural Historian
NCDOT - Historic Architecture
Date: May 9, 2023
DIMES K DLOGDON, M
SE.I y}; l'A N 7'
Subject: Historic Structures Sunev Report, Iriden SR 1006 (Old Stage Roao from SR
2736 (Rock Service Slarion Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling 1feadoxs Drhw), Wake
Country; Morlh Ca rohna TIP No- HL-00081 TTBS JVo_ 49367_ I _ I _ PA No_ 2I -08-
000i- ER 23-0877_
Thank you for tour recent comments on the above report_ We are pleased that you concur with
our recommendations that the Stephenson-Sauls House (W-A8812) is not eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places. There are no other resources of concern in the HL-00091
study area, thus no effects consultation is and the project is considered in compliance
u7th both GS 121-12(a) and Section 106 for historic architecture.
As ah%uays, your help is greatly appreciated- Should questions arise, please contact meat
vepatrick a�, cdot¢ov or 919-707- 082-
4
V.E.P.
4SsumAd&sss: Telephone: [phone] Locatba:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Far: (919)-212-5785 102D BIRCH RMOR EME
HUMAN EMr1K0_N1= SECnON C,1DxrYrSerrur:1-S'"+-3684962 RAL,EiGHNC27610
DSSC 1598
RALEIGK NC 27699-159S licbsier: wwiF_ncdotgot•
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 7 of 7

Tribal Coordination

Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]
February 25, 2022
Attention: Zahid Baloch
NC Department of Transportation
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Re. THPO # TCNS # Project Description
Widening of Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive
2022-193-82 in Wake Co., NC as project HL-00081
Dear Mr. Baloch,
The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questions please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Office 803-328-2427
July 17, 2024
Attention: Heather Montague
NC Department of Transportation
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Re. THPO # TCNS # Project Description
Widening of Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake
2024-193-208 Co., NC as project HL-00081
Dear Ms. Montague,
The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questions, please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Permit Drawings with SWMP

Highway
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater
Highway Stormwater Program 111)
d
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 49367.1.9
TIP/Pro' No: HL-00081 Coun ies : Wake Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element:
I TIP Number: HL-00081 Project T e: Roadway Widening Date: 3/13/2024
NCDOT Contact:
Galen Cail, PE
Contractor / Des i ner:
Patrick Hartnett, PE
Address:
1000 Birch Ridge Drive
Address:
Summit Design and Engineering Services
Raleigh, NC 27610
3301 Benson Dr
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone:
919 707-6711
Phone:
919 322-0115
Email:
cail ncdot. ov
Email:
atrick.hartnett summi[de.com
City/Town:
Raleigh
County(ies):
Wake
River Basins :
Neuse I
I CAMA County?
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
No
Project Descri tion
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.814 Miles I Surrounding Land Use: Rural area, primarily residential and agricultural land usage
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area (ac.)
11.8 Jac.
4.1 lac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
4 lane road with 12'travel lanes, 14' wide concrete median and curb and gutter.
2 lane road with 10'travel lanes and grass shoulders.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
I Design/Future: 26400 1 Year: 2040
I Existing: 1 15400 1 Year:1 2022
General Project Narrative:
Project Number HL-00081 involves the widening of Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake County. The existing
(Description of Minimization of Water
roadway consists of two 10 foot lanes with grass shoulders. The proposed roadway will consist of four 12 foot travel lanes with curb and gutter and a concrete monolithic island
Quality Impacts)
where applicable. The existing area is 4.1 acres and the proposed project built -upon area is 11.8 acres. There are 4 surface water ponds located along the project corridor.
Minimization efforts are taken to avoid impacting these ponds to the greatest extent practicable. Existing drainage outlet pipes in surface water ponds are to be retained where
possbile to avoid additional impacts and ROW acquisition. One surface water pond will be completely filled in as a result of this project as the footprint of the roadway embankment
encompasses a majority of the pond. All closed system drainage outlets are designed to have non -erosive velocities and riprap dissipator pads are proposed at all pipe outlet
locations. Furthermore, minimum grade base ditches are used to distance some point discharge locations from the edge of buffered streams/bodies of water. Countersunk riprap
pads are utilized in jurisdictional streams upstream of proposed pipe extensions. Finally, as this project ties to the end of the recently completed R-2828 project, parts of the
drainage network and outlet stabilization from the R-2828 project will be retained or replaced in kind to avoid additional impacts to the jurisdicational streams and surrounding buffer
zones.

Highway
Stormwater
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
y
WBS Element: 49367.1.9 TIP/Pro' No.: HL-00081
Coun ies : Wake
Page 2 of 2
General Project Information
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Tributary to Little Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-43-15-10
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No I Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
E ehmeral/Intermittent Stream C / Drainage A Data Point
IBuffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
No
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body 1 : Tributary to Panther Branch
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-43-15-9
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No T Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Intermittent Stream B and R-2828 SCB(1)
Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
IDeck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? iYes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
INo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I

0-
pq
a
ti
H
See Sheet 9 A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 9 B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 9 C- 9 For Survey Control Sheet
�
taa�LLS I51
4i5bts
3 k g
Pa 1e ar. Z�
_
4;
'�
dz P
4867 4865
044 eider �.r.
�`
4E
2721 F e.
1010 3851
2891
42
g
c°
Opportunity ed8.2.841
svy p°,nt t.
yoc
2891
Q 146711 y t'
5353
1006
w.
5331 skv a,dee
1468 S 84D
Perri—, a. °asb�tg
2839
2722 Rd. 5353
1010
1469st.
McCullers
Ten -re
o
Rd.
Williams
CYOSSYOadS
1503
Vance
Elem,
U
o �
540
1010
4027
2779
;t L
a
` \
5345
Gentle
Wake Tee ical
\
Slope
Way
college
\ _
\
5344
1e�n
5507 5509 \ \ Z
73
_
v v
2811
v v v
1006
C�
vie
2723
v
c ,5507 "-' 55t)8
2796
3884
2724
2724
2724
2998
1006
288
5386
3765
0
a
o`Pa
3724 3855
Bik
3764 3
5366
3835 Rd
5364
33��33��55 °i3783
��
v
N
�7
sitters°n
2723 N
5537
381
or. a
3864
Pa
t
38 &
a
5364 5365
3
c,
4810 Ve
VICINITY
MAP
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
—Y1— STA. 10 + 50.00
9
�3b
C ��JJ�G
S'Il°A°T'lE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF fil""HWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
LOCATION: WIDENING SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) FROM
SR 2736 (ROCK SERVICE STATION ROAD) TO
SR 3884 (ROLLING MEADOWS DRIVE)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & SIGNAL
[WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT J
SITE 1
SITE 2
BEGIN PROJECT HL-00081
—L— STA. 10 + 00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
—YIA— STA. 12+25.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
—Y2— STA. 12 + 50.00
i
No
cn SITE 4
�r.
lI i i
Z
i II N m —L— S 1 006
`���� ► .� (OLD S 6E RD.)
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
HL-00081
I
STATE PROD. NO.
F. A. PROD. NO.
DESCRIPTION
49367.1.9
NA
PE
49367.2.10
NA
ROW
49367.2.27
NA
UTILITIES
NAD 83/2011
END CONSTRUCTION
—Y3— STA. 12 + 40.00
SITE 5
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 10
a
ao O
CV)a
aej
C�
l ? END CONSTRUCTION
a —Y3A— STA. 10 + 85.00
O
------- ----- - ---
- PROPOSED R-2828
(BY OTHERS)
SITE 3
r
o
Gq
R
END PROJECT H L-00081
—L— STA. 54 + 14.00
PROPOSED SIGNAL
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
el
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
el
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2022 = 15,400
ADT 2045 = 28,900
V = 50 MPH
FUN[ = MINOR
CLASS = ARTERIAL
REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT H L-00081 - 0.814 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-00081 = 0.814 MILES
Prepared in the Office of:
320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC
SUMMIT Voice: (919) 732-38838-8551
Fax: [phone]
DESIGN AND ENGINEERINGSERW= www.summitde.net
FIRM NO. P-D339
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
-----------------------
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
O '?
�� �4
Q�
a
a
2O18 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
NOVEMBER 22, 2023
R OAD WA Y DESIGN'
ENGINEER
-----------------------
PE
SIGNATURE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
FAITH E. JAHNKE, PE
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
LETTING DATE:
MARCH 18 , 2025
NCDOT CONTACT. LAMI N JAH
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

0-
0-
Cn
Z
O
w
w
N
O
O
LQ
N
J
LLJ
LLJ
z
O
U
W
LQ
LQ
O
C
01
(,n
n
�t
E
N k
— Q
N�
LINDA LOU COLLINS LAWRENCE
DB 1496 PG 396
-L-
P/ Sto 12 +46.24
PI Sto 14 +49.03
=
2° 12' 19.7" (LT)
z�s =
2° 26' 31.1" (RT )
D =
/* 08' 45.3"
D =
/* 08- 45.3"
L =
192.46'
L =
213.10"
T =
96.24'
T =
106.57'
R =
5,000.00'
R =
5,000.00'
SE
= RC
SE
= RC
RO
= SEE PLANS
RO
= 84'
D ETAI L 4-1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural at Fill
Ground 3•1 D Slope
Min. D= 0.9 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 15 + 50 -L- LT
0
PRC -L - Sto. 0 +4
N 0 '56'oq„ w PC —L —
k
MICHAEL BALL
C 1 •
x i i QOT DB 13823 PG 312
BM 2002 PG 1879
-L- Sto.10+00.00� x
M P
ISFD
z x;
CD
STEVEN W. M E A S x n i
AND W DEREK A. BE, k ROGER & SHARRON BA L I z
LEWIS C. WILKERSON �, = AND WIFE, � �
� RRY M D M z c � ESTATE 15-E- PG 372 ~ m MAUREEN M. BEESE a DB 6152 PG 251 /40 TAPER
o w l I B 93 PG 1672 z DB 16294 PG 899 �� ; BM 1994 PG 559 0 EX. (LT /RT )
DB 18286 PG 76l9 I LT, �x o, BM 1993 PG 953
�o ��� I �o w y o
1 x i ED
I o aSPECIAL LATERAL V DITCH
ED
x 4iSEE DETAIL 4-1
CULTIVATED FIELD
0 2SFD
X� t i I
I\ MT l I a O I
/ a I
k i � a I �
KEYPA , , I , IRRIGA ON
BST WELL X LS PIPE CLEAN -OUT
mx — E
� �� 4 �,
_ — — — —
f EIP �— —T o— _ — -
- —T Fo— — EIP
I \ T
T F 5" RCP / � 5' P �
rk rkr�kr�krrk�k ski /=15" RCP_ —TV— — — — —TV— —
T
TO NC 42 — _ x N N 24° 28' 02.711' W
— — —T— _ _�_ _ _ — — —r— — — �BYI-102
`hl I RCP 72" VINYL
5" HDP gY1-104 — — COL — — — — — — x X
—P— — _ u
— P — _ EXISTIN R/W
- — — — � � 1 EIP � — P — —• PER BM 1988 PG 1211
EXISTING R/W� — S\GHT 7RIANG N 25°51'09 W
PER BM 1988 PG 1211 BK LANOSCAPE�HT NGL 7� LA & 358.98' LEMASTER LIVING TRUST
/ I _ _ OL SIGN EASEMENT I WELL SIGN MENT x DB 18369 PG 382
° 0 PI BK I 45.00' I BM 1998 PG 1211
P — — — — — °Cq I \ \ Q J
/ \ B& CO4 I a \ A\ s
2SFD /BK �� WELL / \ \ \ IS BK D _j
j FOUNTAIN \ �_ �� \ m
£ Ib �J\ CONC �� A / CONC\ G R
N CONC J ANGUI. NGU�FN!_
��\ AND-- — — — r� — a� N 23.59' &, W 0 72" VINYL
TRUE YEN — ~ EIP 223.64'
L 16866 PG 1966 /
PLANTER BM 1998 PG 1211
N s 3�`2� 45, °i// "�P� JOSHUA M. WETHERINGTON
CO PLANTER 32 / � DB 17149 PG 1069
❑ EIP \ o BM 1998 PG 1211
X KHALIL KHATIB \
AND
X `/3 BASMA NABABTEH �� ��� \ BEGIN fOJECT HL= 08/
DB 19017 PG 1712 _
BM 1998 P 1211 � z \ -L S .10+00.00
� 2SFD c / / �
\� \9�
�
v o S �O
o .
N m
p� O
312.20'
S 27-54'46" E
N 25'30'35" W
100.45'
123.46'
S 27*54,46" E
D ETAI L 4-2
TAIL DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 3'J 00 Ground
FGq GR D
�FR F�
Min. D= 1.0 Ft. "B LENGTH = 39 FT
B= 3.0 Ft. SLOPE = 0.005 FT/FT
CA
FROM STA. 14+81 OFFSET 80 FT -L- RT
07 j
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0008/ 1 4
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
z
cs
=J oa
O W
Un
W W
m
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
n Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
Office of: [f],SUMMIT 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
oiaaN ua a�axNa a—wm [phone]
[phone] (FAX)
w
� o
M CD
(\j a)
z
• I
.00
\ X
I I
I I I 1
ISFD
I I
BARNS
60
I I
' I
440' WIDENING (LT/RT
ISF I421'INC.
BUS Ln YP.
NOTi DISTURB -- * +\ 5.00
ATION OUTL 37.0a \T
SO/L EX. R!W
'—
--E-- — —— E
EXIaN W
1 E
N i i/ nil 2
3.21' R/W
TO R/W MON,��
i
SHED PM
MT UM a SER
VALVES
/
N � ,
' 2/
o i � S�
CO
C i DAVID BALL
DB 15768 PG 37
\ BM 2002 PG 1876
BM#I
6 No 68522
�- Ee 2098243
BYI- STA 14+74.
O/S 170' RIGHT
ELEV.= 365.86'
\ BENCH TIE IN BASE
OF 22" MAPLE
S(�--- IF
ON
IWSE=,364.5' +/-
I
/ �5� 5 T N5 CLSB RIPRAP J
14 Y GEOTEXTILE
TAIL DITCH
I00' TAP SEE DETAIL 4-2 Z 1
REMOVE 500/
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 10
TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
U
N 65'19'29" E
195.41'
O
0
IQ:�)
V )
QVE
o Ln
C
Q
F R€M6VE-
LQ
48" W
SE#tlkfOV N RD
2 '
BST
040 �-4
Sf
o i i
CC) L�
i
Ilm ,
n
2 61 RETAIN BEGI
16" C&G
i
� I
�
I
ISBKD
MARION WEST, SR.
& MARY WEST
DB 1590 PG 651
N
24'22'12" W
157.46'
FOR —L— PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8
235
S 0?,58a

Cn
z
O
w
w
CATHERINE RACKLEY
DB 13823 PG 303
BM 2018 PG 888
i
BEGIN CONST RUC
01
cn
n
::
E
N k
- Q
N�
=T,
,zT_
N1 1
o�-
N�
i Q-
z�
z�
�1
1 J
�_
Yl - Sta. l0 +50.00
PC -Yl - Sta. l0 +00.00
PT -Yl- Sta. ll +33.42
CP
'2c \
DETAIL 5-1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural lyN Fill
Ground 3.7 D\o��e Slope
Min. D = 0.6 Ft.
FROM STA. 15 + 89 TO STA. 16 + 50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 13 + 50 -Y1- LT
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 15 + 44 -Y1- RT
DETAIL 5-2
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural �•1 Fill
Ground 3.7 D\O Slope
D = 0.7 Ft.
FROM STA. 16 + 50 TO STA. 18 + 00 -L- LT
FROM STA. 15 + 56 TO STA. 16 + 90 -Y1- R1
s
NAD 8 011
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-00081
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
5
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the ��I� NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
Office of: �� 320 Executive -
Hillsborough, NC 2727278
°iaeN era assanNemmccs [phone]
919) 732-6676 (FAX)
0 9ss PERMIT DRAWING
DETAIL 5-3 \o R1� + \ ��' °� \ 000 Jc _ _ + END GRADE SHEET 4 O F 10
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH �gP� q, \ \ \ k� PRC YIA Sta. 11 /0.0/ -YIA- Sta.12+25.00
( Not to Scale) \0 �2 RR 2�� \\ + � ° \\\
4 o POT -YIA - Sta. l0 +00.00 -DR3 - POT Sta. l0 +00.00 =
Natural _3N °et Fill - + \ \ \ \ _ _ N 74° 09' 54.3" E (AH) TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Ground 3•� D \0 Slope \ \\ \ POT Sta. /5 +50.00 -L- + w
ANNETTE ATKINSON \ \ POT -D - Sta. 11+25.00 L POC Stae l8 78.04 � ,
DB 17149 PG 2076 ' 7 N
BM 2018 PG 888 ,�. \ \� y� SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Min D= 0.9 Ft \ \ of
SPECIAL LATERAL
V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 5-1
d,
`F \ °'�
9 k Q
Sta. = 10 + 50 -Yl- LT
Q10 = 2.17 cfs
V10 = 2.27 fps
d = 0.6 ft
s = 0.0165 ft/ft
n = 0.035
Liner= GRASS
TIMOTHY & ROBERT BRYAN
DB 15205 PG 1102
BM 2002 PG 1878
°\ 0 N
e Q��O� to
FROM STA. 15 + 50 TO STA. 15 + 89 -L- LT 4- - + \\\ \ \�` REMOVE N l8 27 52. ati
PC -Yl - Sta. 12 +36.80 - FCC -YIA - Sta. 12 +12.79
\\ ` PT -YIA-
/ SPECIAL LATERAL %�i \ PC -YIA- Sta. -H7.81 15 3 TONS CL B RIPRA
V DITCH \ \ BEGIN 8"X18" CURB Sta. 12+30.66 10 SY GEOTE TILE
SEE DETAIL 5-1 \ \ \ N YI 00 DO NOTEND RESURFACING
tJ0 DISTURB SIGN
-L - S a. 20 +46.00
CIO/ \ \ \ �\ \Do \ BEGIN 2'6" C&G TURB CANY
st-a-'= 10 0 -Yl- RT S °26'25"E
Q10= 1.8 cf k6`�° APR \ -Yl- +9/.75 ti9 52 ��' 2 3°80'
V10 = 2.02 s `�� T� sa EN 8"X18" & 2 6 CUR
d= D.6 ft \ //� A� \ ' + \ Fs 999 g99 -L- +49°l5
s- 133 f x 0 \\ T,�� F T "ND ✓sue
n = 0 _035 Stq� 10 -Y1aR O_ \ ��
Liner= GRASS 0 83 cf A23 �ti �, ' 6 }<
A°�' PASTURE JAMES STEPHENSON ��. JAMES STEPHENSON
��SOUTH N DB 4388 PG 545 WB 00-E PG 275
d= 0.7 \ Ob \ / ti TE OV 0 I PLU INL T 1 BM 1993 PG 1100
s = 0 5 ftXft 9
\ \ \\� / DB 09 P 57 Q ANDI BANDON F�0
WATER R
Liner 035GRASS r ` \\TG AC/ �' �apUF BURIED NNSAME TRENCH
�Pti C
�� �\ BEGIN 216" I PROPOSED OVERFLOW y I O
PT -Yl- Sta. 15+73.97 N _ \ °2 �i �` L 9 WOOD / �' PIPE TO PROVI[YEND
/
PT -DRI- Sta.IO+a
N 18° 27' S2.4" W AHD 00.00 Nz� z G \ O _ / / C RELIEF FOR POND / O E T / L I 18" RCP -III / I ti STORM O
EVENTS � -� P A � \ � 2 q / �s � � - -
O �Sa( T H 1 I / aJ
�' C \ K BV J N 6357.39' / O
CATHERINE RACKLEY �� z \ , F o E 20B7629.03U /
DB 13823 PG 303 \ \C ` ° / - ��� o BS p 42' INC. RETA I
1 Utility Elv. 2. 5 I
BM 2018 PG 888 \q `� \/ \ 3 \ / C TYP. 2" L�ST1C 52 0516 52
440' z ° \ x - - R o_P:
\ RIP RA �
DO NOT EN "C&G \ 15 \ F \ ' IO' � 'R BOLLARDS \� DITCH I // RETAIN �\\ T° BI 2 RCP -IV REMOVE
-Yl- +50.98 z C p a F� I� E E HD uND tio� H 52 R OVE
48" T a
3 \ °2 5 F \ 1 S Xl8 C T Fa-TTcA- --. .- . , - - - - - - 1 _ x -6< - tom- - - - F
��Q W �P�D T 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - -
IL IAM & CATHERINE `S N F �� /
RACKLEY s Jt�,C o / CB > 15" RCP -IV o 051 C 18' RCP -IV CB 0515 CB 2 LQ
B 2168 PG 157
BEGIN ✓ \ T -Tv-
\ �0 SPECIAL AT L
216" C&G} ° ➢ �L ��` - c�, A "
L- +80°0 V DIT ��S T I o I' C&G - - - - - - - - -T 0 - 4.11' XL_ _T / B OVE FO - P - - (� N 0.18' DIP TO R/ J
SEE AIL 5-1 2
N REMOVE 1g' R 2'6" C&G
o \ / S IAL L4 ERA L 05 0 5 -\ BST `� B 1 P IV RE V 051 N
- _ --- �1
o S�E ITCH
- � ' / \ ��� ~ / C 20' _
y/ E� - S A R IM T 6'
S IAL �\ /
LATE L ,oa S \ ST E PRO#CTI T DR IJ �T C S
\\ 1 m 5 I 2 s-f 1.1T i� �' \ � C.
E I H / J I„ `C E AG I U U PUE PUE PUE
D B P-RA
REMOV i ��° / 5 I S DE AIL 5 4 } SN- S ELL m
\L // CB I RE WOO
OUTLET \ it �-
a ISFD - WOODS \
co ca . REMOVE H
I I
Nw ISBKD �Q
S TDE I1 III v
7-1 D NN D BE
FILLED BOO' TAPER r, TURN LANE I\
26 2 `� III N�
-, r az € Ln
x-------J_ VERONIC RRO IILn
�2 p. 00
4-AA IQ, di 7 PA RIQ
I III
C) 11 SHED
`1
S o m s SH 1CS 244,25' Q10 = 2.76 cfs J
REU TL-3 PC -L- Sta. 17+71.96 � A I � V10 = 3.03 fps V10 = 2.22 fps I a
2" ALTERNATE
G� SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD 0.7
N� � � 1 d = 0.6 ft d = ft
m a LOCAL SAG IN = o v LP - 0.025 ft�ft s= 0.0133 ftXf
11 ^1 k, U-TURN BULB, _
22 POND U�Iv o QJ GRADE TO DRAIN n fl3 r`" �`" �`"s '� rJ�"s U)`nw
ACROSS D/W Liner= GRASS Liner= GRASS
PERMANENT URFACE 253 �,� i R AIN
WATER IMPA TS DER DAISY, LLC
DM 19 o Pc 8211 / �ti P -Yl_ Sta. 17 f37.23
O P1 POT -L Sta. 18+66.47 PT -L- Sta. 20+95.12
IO � SEPTIC REPAIR AREA JOHNNY B UM JR. & AMY BYNUM
LPN � `' ' � DB 8449 PG 512
N o �OD �a ��, 25 BM 20 PG 1481
Go
\ Qa a BM 20 PG 1482
RE VE
N
r � �
TEMPO RF ,a
W PA °
�o
N
°60o
ti N
Ujom
27
28
FORREST & MARSHA BALL
DB 7806 PG 504
BM 2016 PG 1645
-DR3 - POT Sta. 11 +33.72 y�� N FROM STA. 23 + 41.82 TO STA. 23 + 91.81 -L- RT
0
Z
PT -L- Sta. l5 +55.57 0
312 MARION WEST, SR. 24
22 DB 1 90Y PG WESTPG

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
14+45 TO 14+58 RT
Tail Ditch
0.005
2
15+69 TO 15+99 -L- RT
Pipe Removal and Installation
<0.001'
0.004
3
23+47 TO 24+09 -L- RT
Pond Drainage
0.063
3
23+89 TO 24+10 -L- RT
Roadway Fill
0.001
14
4
36+50 TO 36+59 -L- LT
30" RCP Extension
<0.001 **
12
4
36+59 TO 36+70 -L- LT
Rip Rap Inlet Stabilization
<0.001 "`
<0.001 ""
10
5
5
52+60 TO 52+76 -L- LT
Pipe Outlet Channel Stabilization
<0.001""`
<0.001"""
19
5
TOTALS':
0.000
1 0.00
1 0.00
i 0.000
1 0.00
1 0.064
0.010
55
10
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
*Proposed 12" Alternate Permanent SW Impacts = 10.8 sf
**Proposed 30" RCP Stub Out Permanent SW Impacts = 16.4 sf
***Rip Rap Inlet Stabilization Permanent SW Impacts = 13.6 sf
****Rip Rap Inlet Stabilization Temporary SW Impacts = 6.4 sf
*****Proposed Pipe Outlet Channel Stabilization Permanent SW Impacts = 18.3 sf
——Proposed Pipe Outlet Channel Stabilization Temporary SW Impacts = 6.4 sf

0-
pq
a
ti
H
See Sheet 9 A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet I For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 9 C- I For Survey Control Sheet
�
taa�Laal
4aba
o`
i3 ak
or, �^ \\F
_
4
PSG
-
4867 4865
4044 elder pr,
2721 F e_
1010 3851
2891
42
g
c°
Opportunity ed, 2.841
SKV P."'L t
50
2891
!� 1467n' �, t'
5353
1006
W.
5331 sky R,dge
^ s 84D
P-ri— ct.
146813
p „as"19
- 2839
2722 Rd. 5353
101011
1469sr,
McCullers
ren-re
o
Rd.
Williams
CYOSSYOadS
1503
Vance
Elem.
0
U
540
1010
027
— 2779
\
,t
D
� \
5345
\ \
Gentle
Wake Tec ical
\
Slope
Way
college
\ _
5344
Teen
5507 5509
v v
2811
v v v
1006
rthA,
Ct 2723
v
v
r1
c m5507 "- 55
2796
3884
2724
2724
2724
2998
1DD
288
5386
3765
q
3724 s, 3855
r
— sd
Rd
3764 3
e
5366
5364
33gg��55 °i3783
N'
.�
2
�7
Sitters—
2723 5537
381
or. a
3864
Pa
t
3816
a
5364 5365
4810
VICINITY
MAP
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 10 + 50.00
� 3�0 �
G -
S ; 4-
SITE 1
5°l[">>°T'lE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF fil""HWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
LOCATION.- WIDENING SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) FROM
SR 2736 (ROCK SERVICE STATION ROAD) TO
SR 3884 (ROLLING MEADOWS DRIVE)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & SIGNAL
SITE 2
BEGIN PROJECT HL-00081
-L- STA. 10 + 00.00
BUFFER IMPACTS]
END CONSTRUCTION
-YIA- STA. 12+25.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- STA. 12 + 50.00
i
SITE 3
Nt,
N
SITE 4
V)�
Z
I
cN m
1.
-L-
S
(OLD
S
,XO6
E RD.)
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
HL-00081
I
STATE PROD. NO.
F. A. PROD. NO.
DESCRIPTION
49367.1.9
NA
PE
49367.2.10
NA
ROW
49367.2.27
NA
UTILITIES
NAD 83/2011
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y3- STA. 12 + 40.00
r—
SITE 5
--DR2
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 6
—1>
4
ao 0
CV)a
C�
l ? END CONSTRUCTION
-Y3A- STA. 10 + 85.00
0
PROPOSED R-2828
(BY OTHERS)
0
\ ARN
ER
END PROJECT H L-00081
-L- STA. 54 + 14.00
PROPOSED SIGNAL
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2022 = 15,400SU�Jt4IT
ADT 2045 = 2 8,900
V = 5 0 MPH
FUNC = MINOR
CLASS = ARTERIAL
REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT HL-00081 - 0.814 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT HL-00081 = 0.814 MILES
Prepared in the Office of:
320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC
Voice: (919) 732-38838-8551
Fax: [phone]
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES www.summitde.net
FIRMNO.
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
-----------------------
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
O
Q� Oo
a
���
o� ��a��Q
2O18 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
TIO
BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
NOVEMBER 22, 2023
ROADWAY DESIGN'
ENGINEER
-----------------------
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
FAITH E. JAHNKE, PE
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
LETTING DATE:
MARCH 18 , 2 02 5
NCDOT CONTACT. LAMI N JAH
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

0-
0-
V)
Z
O
w
w
cl'
N
C)
LQ
I
N
J
LQ
Q
CL
Z
O
U
W
CC
I
CC
0
z
—L—
PI Sto 12 *46.24
PI Sto 14 f49.03
eL =
2° 12' 19.7" (LT)
z�s =
2° 26' 3/.1" (RT )
D =
/* 08' 45.3"
D =
/* 08' 45.3"
L =
192.46'
L =
2/3.10'
T =
96.24'
T =
106.57'
R =
5,000.00'
R =
5,000.00'
SE
= RC
SE
= RC
RO
= SEE PLANS
RO
= 84'
LINDA LOU COLLINS LAWRENCE
DB 1496 PG 396
N 25°30'35" W
100.45'
---w LG
Xnz
I C) m
STEVEN W. McA A S X
� W W
N AND WIFE, LEWIS C. WILKERSON
m RRY M D M z U, ESTATE 15-E- PG 372 m
6 ' w B 93 PG 1672 X Iz
DB 18286 PG 76� I e _
N `J� � O � �
X � w
2SFD I� m m
XO7 T
I� MT a
03
n KEYPA ;/==j
m / BST 4ELL X LS
E P �` � — S-iD—�X
/ T F —T F� 15' RCPEIP
:_�-15" RCP
V--
TO NC 42
DEREK A. BEESE
AND WIFE,
MAUREEN M. BEESE �a /
DB 16294 PG 899
BM 1993 PG 953 P i it
/ / o
/ I
—TV
T— — —T— — — — �—
�5_HDPL BK { — — — — —T-
-T— — — ♦r BYI-102
II 18" RCP 72" VINYL
BYI-104 _ COL x X
—P— — _ u
— � — — — — — — — — _ EXISTIN R/W
- — — —� EIP — P — —� PER BM 1988 PG 1211
EXISTING R/W — SIGHT 7RIANG N 25°51'09" W
PER BM 1988 PG 1211 BK LANDSCAPE�HT NGL T0� LAt� & 358.98' LEMASTER LIVING TRUST
/ I _ _ OIL SIGN EASEMENT I I WELL SIGN MENT X DB 18369 PG 382
P1 B o I BM 1998 PG 1211
f / \ \ B& co4
2SFD /BK T°� WELL I
FOUNTAIN
CONC
coNc � J AI�GU�. NGU� _ J
1 AND --
TRUE — = T�—
o \ YEN —
ED L 16866 PG 1966
PLANTER BM 1998 PG 1211
ti
S 3 /
� 322e45' _
PLANTER
KHALIL KHATIBAND
a F
BASMA N BABTEH
DB 19017 PG 1712 �`O� /
BM 1998 P 1211
2SFD
a
o .
N m
p� O
31244
S 27°5'6" E
w a
cb
� O
V
123.46'
S 27°54'46' E
\A
1
_ CONC
— —E__
018" W n 72".VI
3`D
JOSHUA M. WETHERINGTON
DB 17149 PG 1069
BM 1998 PG 1211
23S
S 0 T °58 a
D ETAI L 4-1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural 1 01 Fill
Ground 3•� F\p'\ Slope
D
Min. D = 0.9 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 15 + 50 -L- LT
IA
BENCH T I C IN BASE
OF 22" MAPLE
DETAIL 4-2
TAIL DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 3'I Oa Ground
FGq �R D 3', .�(�`�
�FR F�
Min. D= 1.0 Ft. "B LENGTH = 39 FT
B= 3.0 Ft. SLOPE = 0.005 FT/FT
FROM STA. 14+81 OFFSET 80 FT -L- RT
O7i
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-0008/
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No:P-0339
Office of:CSUMMIT 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
O NA EmlNQimm [phone]
[phone] (FAX)
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
/ I
/ 1
ISBN
MARION WEST, SR.
& MARY WEST
DB 1590 PG 651
N 24°22'12" W
157.46'
FOR —L— PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8

N
O
�O
W
Z
O_
`n N
> N
w
J
v
LQ
O
W
O
OO
U
W
LLJ
U
Q
Z
O
U
W
LQ
ILLJ
O
z
�^tea
CATHERINE RACKLEY
DB 13823 PG 303
BM 2018 PG 888
i
i BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
Sta. l0 +50.00
DETAIL 5-1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural N °� Fill
Ground 0. 7 D �\o�eC
Slope
Min. D= 0.6 Ft.
FROM STA. 15 + 89 TO STA. 16 + 50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 13 + 50 -Yl- LT
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 15 + 44 -Yl- RT
DETAIL 5-2
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural ,�•\ c" Fill
Ground 3.7 D \psi Slope
Min. D= 0.7 Ft.
FROM STA. 16 + 50 TO STA. 18 + 00 -L- LT
FROM STA. 15 + 56 TO STA. 16 + 90 -Y1- R1
a
NAD 8 011
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-0008/
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
5
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
Office of: [tSUMMIT 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
oro°N ua ia°INQiwa°mmcss [phone]
[phone] (FAX)
BUFFER DRAWING
D ETAI L 5-3 � o
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH pR - + \ \ 000 5 END GRADE SHEET 3 O F
( Not to sale) �2 ��� �2a o� \ \\ k� PRC -Y/A- Sta. //+/0.0/ -Y/A- Sta. /2+25.00
0 N 2 O \ \ \\\ 2 \ POT -YIA- Sta. 10+00.00 -DR3- POT �Sta. 10+00.00= ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
Natural � 3., °et Fill - + \ \\ \ \ POT - - Sta. /5+50.00 N 74°p09/�54.}3 E IAHI
Ground J. 7 D \O� Slope \ \ �\ \ -� / Ol, S/ a. /8 +78.04 w
ANNETTE ATKINSON \ POT -D - Sta. 11+25.00
DB 17149 PG 2076 ' \ \ 7 (\j
BM 2018 PG 888 \ \ \ \ Q ���� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
Min. D= 0.9 Ft. o\ \ \ �C� ao N
00 �� Ln
FROM STA. 15+50 TO STA. 15+89 -L- LT -Y1- +25.00 - - - + \\\ \ \\ N 18 27 52. N ��° MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
PC -Yl - Sta. 12 +36.80 42.00' RT = \ \ REMOVE PCC -YIA - Sta. 12 +12.79 -\
Ex. RW \ o PC -YIA- Sta. +17.8/ PT -YIA-
/ SPECIAL LATERAL _ � \ ��j 3 TONS CL B RIPRA
V DITCH �� \� \ BEGIN 8"X18" CURB Sta. 12+30.66 10 SY GEOTE TILE MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
SEE DETAIL 5-1 / \ \ �\ N YI 00 DO NOTEND RESURFACING
DISTURB SIGN
-L- S a. 20 +46.00
DO AQ�
_ // \ \�� '\ \\ BEGIN 2'6" C&G TURB CAN Y10
€
Q10 = 18 cf -Yl- RT / 6 00 P� \ \\ \\ \ \ -Yl - +91.75 ,� / �� - S °26'25" E
V10 = 2.02 s �' �\ �\ T96° EN 8" XI8" & 2'6" CURB �� " 2 3 °ao'�
d = �.6 ft \ /� o ° ' + \ \ \ 999 9 -L - +49.15
s = .. 133 f� \ \\ s�2c . 99� „ND JS - \✓S�
n = 0 _035 Stq. - 1 +40 -Y1�oR + \ \ �� � F
Liner= GRASS 0 83 cf A23 1ti di 6 �
A°)� PASTURE � � JAMES STEPHENSON ��. JAMES STEPHENSON
1 1.39 qA�° �� \ \ ``g`'i SOUTH N DB 4388 PG 545 I WB 00-E PG 275
d = 0.7 I 1 BM 1993 PG 1100
S= 0 5 ft7ft TE F.PHO
_ C\\ \\� �/ i DB 9"09 P 57 `•"`� � I 'LU AND ABANDON L
n 035 r \ \ A WATER LINE AND POWER Q � p
Liner= GRASS \ \T (i / �� a� PU I U C
\ \ /� F BURIED IN SAME TRENCH / {
k0� 9 y 1 05 \ ' / \ BEGIN 2'6" C&G O
PT -Yl - Sta. l5 +73.97 N �� \ \ \ ��ti �� \ �, L- +89°59 w PROPOSED OVERFLOW y
� � � � WOODS / _ PIPE TO PR VI[�BND
PT -DRI - Sta. 10+00.00 N� z G o \ \ \ O Ln RELIEF FOR FOND
\ �, O
/ r o- / � L I / Q `r' DURING LA GE °
N 18° 27' S2.4" W AHD CPA j + O` 2 q / �sj ,Se •� I T H 18 STORM EVE TS RCP -III I O / 00
-
Y / / / �G\ C \ / Ck eCl \ \ yJ� / z N 86357.39' I n O
CATHERINE RACKLE �� \ �c o �p E 207629.03' RETA '
DB 13823 PG 303 / i \C PF \ o /� \ - -oNc a BS 42' INC. motility EIv° �b2.
BM 2018 PG 888 `� E �9 \ / -- _
l C TYP.2" �sTlc
440 42.00' RT x - - - R o \RIP R4
2 T �° DO NOT -Yl- +50Q END 2'6"C&G \ 15 A F R BOLLARDS \� D�TCH I RETAIN �\\ T° BI 2 RCP -IV REMOVE �I
DISTURB 50.00' RT -Yl- +50.98 �° \ O r , ' o a ➢_ .
\ o F FC I� E HD LEJNDK yam\ H R OVE °
- 40' E E ISTING Riw-� 48 T
p2 � \\ F \ 1 I8"Xl8 CUR T Fa-rT �c9- -
�P�D ����-�------- TF-T�o----------_-T_F - ----I8`-ID-`E_ __ r = --
WIL IAM & CATHERINE `S N F �� / \
RACKLEY s Jt�,C O / CB > 15" RCP -IV o C 18' RCP -IV Cg Cg N 24" RCP -IV 216" C&G (/1
B 2168 PG 157 W p2 �_ REMOVE
-L- + 90.00 \ s, - - - - _ - LQ
9 _ _
-TV-
2'6LT
"C&G} C NG IN SPECIAL AT L s➢ �L E�` - - o - - _
L- +80.0 V DIT T Vp l' C&G - - - - - - - - -T Fo - F - P0.18' EIP TO R/W J
SEE � AIL 5-1 / 2
N /�FVE
o \ / S IAL LA RAL jb� 05 5 - - BST `� B// X / P IV RE V N 18' R 216" C&G
DITCH / _
�\ 20' 2 // IV '� // // 16'
z SU DETAIL - / / ���P�
S IAL �25Yr �'-L + ..77 / 0 0' C / E PRO F
LATE L 33. 0' L / � ' �' S , \ � T N �T � C
I E 5 / ., 2 P \
U U B UE PUE PUE C PUE
E IL REMOVIF i �� /// ` I S DE AIL 5 4 WPOND 62. E OUTLETELL I \
CB `t ` �� REM VE H 13Jw_ \ I m \
WOODS � Q ISFD � REMOVE
a 91i ISBKD I I
/ I
-L- + 94.50 -L- + 06.00 I I 1 I v
( 0 G CP-II / ?� i 75.90' RT 67.0PROF�W III
+ \� 7-BE I l00' TAPER
D D 7 TURN LANE III
D N D FILLED I I I III N C
_ A 0 III
-L- +71.96 o� � o' X -- --- VERONIC -� I I �
47.00' RT -L- + 49.0 I I III v
- + 5.00 50.21' RT �` SHED Sta. = 1 + 8 -
\ S� 47.00' RT o m S I / SHED l- c S 244,25' 1 PTO .76 CfS I J
REU TL-3 PC - Sl . 1.96 .o / V10 = 3.03 fps 2.22 fps
G� SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD d= O.6 ft J. ft I Cn
12 ALTERNATE o' LOCAL SAG IN -L- +60.00 = a
�J Q ^1 LP 41.5 RT 0.02 5 ft4t S _ .0133 = o Ln
Q
I 'k, U-TURN BULB,
CD J GRADE TO DRAIN -L- + 44 fl s E 22 POND r\ Q ACROSS DAY 50.00' R ner= GRASS Li =+7 SS I aC cD
WS=366.5' +/- IG�O 23 / � � � i R AIN a
LIDtO
PC -Yl - Sta. l0 +00.00
F+s
PT -Yl - Sta. 11 +33.42
\ SPECIAL LATERAL
V DITCH
\ o \ SEE DETAIL 5-1
k
\� \ CD 9Ss
Sta. = 10 + 50 -Yl- LT
Q10
= 2.17 cfs
V10 =
2.27 fps
d =
0.6 ft
s =
0.0165 ft4t
n = 0.035
Liner=
GRASS
TIMOTHY & ROBERT BRYAN
DB 15205 PG 1102
BM 2002 PG 1878
DER AISY, LLC VII � I'
RDB 1936 PG 821 P -Yl- Sta. 17+37.23
E BM 202o PG 1481 POT -L- Sta. 18+66.47 PT -L- Sta. 20+95.12
IO SEPTIC REPAIR AREA JOHNNY BYNUM JR. & AMY BYNUM
L N r DB 18449 PG 512
O N �00 �O `�`�/ �� 25 BM 2020 PG 1481
° REMOVE °' � Qa � BM 2020 PG 1482
n N
�a
� o- .too
0
°60O
CV
tom
27
28
FORREST & MARSHA BALL
DB 7806 PG 504
BM 2016 PG 1645
�-DR3 - 4,67 I .Dc�; FROM STA. 23 + 41.82 TO STA. 23 + 91.81 -L- RT
AI ����m
�1 1 CONSTRUCTION o
/ Z
PT -L- Sta. l5 +55.57 0
3ti 2 MARION WEST, SR.
50. 24
22 & MARY WEST
50.000'' R RT 57 u,DB 1590 PG 651

1:/)
z
O
w
OD
N
DALVIS CONERLY
DB 17816 PG 2410 0
BM 1993 PG 1100 w
------ - - - -�� -
04°56'33" E D� I
129.06' I I
1 I
(:D
�❑ III 1!�
JAME S EPHENSON `
WB 0 -E PG 275 ❑ I IIII
BM 11 93 G 1100 I II
m
x
\ n\ 60 z
I NI I
I
GARAGE I No ICI
I � III
� o
I
BANKS
CEMETERY
BEGIN CONSTR
-Y2- Sto. l2 +51
X. EX. I I
EX R/W
}
C
❑�❑
REM O E
O
d4 02 \�
SPECIAL LATERAL V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 6-1 9
❑
+74
DURWOOD BALL
X J
I rn
DB 13823 PG 321
,
03 I
-Y2- +43.00 BM 2002 PG 1877
CULTIVATED
❑
❑�
0
I
EX W
BM 2013 PG 150 FIELD
ooC
❑ ❑
��
1
I I
BM2013PIG 499
32'6"
2- 0.00
2
C&G
N +
1
021 I
+28.98
-Y2- f76.42
EX. RNV
I '
I
-Y2- + 81.50
END 2'6" C&G
I
z
65.00' LT
45.00' LT
-Y2- +90.55
D
I
01
EX RSV
❑
-Y2- + 06.0 F D
�M
I
I I
-Y2- + 00.00
37.00' LT
EX. R/W
❑
0 NOT DISTURB+23.72
Ijr(ZI
-L- +55.
86.00' LT EX. R/W
-Y7- � 14 nn
/"
t
/ �' Fit 11'�!CI�•
• • 1 1 . ,I
/► u
Y
, 1 ' �
,
�, . to
s�.�
� •
_Nva"iOff41
11
,
11r
F
F-6
J
J
a
00
Qvtn
=Ov
(N Ln lD
aa-a-
Lo
co
� ti N
Ulm
O
L�
M
REMOVE
-L- + 50
S 20 2s'gq„ W
16S 09,
00.00
S 09°26'37" W
143.35' NAD 8
/0
DETAIL 6-1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
(Not to Scale)
Natural 1 at � Fill
Ground J. D F�O�ie Slope
Min. D= 1.1 Ft.
FROM STA. 12 + 50 TO STA. 14 + 31 -Y2- LT
47 24 W
DETAIL 6-2 349.35'
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
(Not to Scale)
cn AXLE
_ cc
N 6l
Natural N at , Fill u'
Ground 3.7 D �\a�e Slope o
rr1
I Min. D = 0.7 Ft.
FROM STA. 29 + 34 TO STA. 34 + 50 -L- LT
N 01°48'49" E
1 199.36'
PC
-L-
Sto. 28 +79.02
I
0
DURWOOD BALL
DB 13823 PG
321
BM 2002 PG
1877
❑
BM 2013 PG
150
BM 2013 PG
499
180.00' POWERLINE EASEMENT
BM 2002 PG 1877
IN
I21
❑
BM 2013 PG 499
In
C3
o C
m
SPECIAL LATERAL V
DITCH
3m
m m I^ m
'2
N
SEE DETAIL 6-2
I
N
a m
a�v
GA EASEMENT
Q0
z
r,
❑
50'
pg 8 31 PG132
o�
co
I
> 24" RCP -IV 60.00 LT
Natural Natural
Ground S7?��
Ground
d
Tuck Geotextile
Geotextile a Minimum of lft
)TYP)
Min. D = 1.3 Ft.
d= 1.4 Ft. LENGTH = 40 FT
B= 2.0 Ft. SLOPE = 0.034 FT/FT
Type of Liner= CL B Rip -Rap, Keyed -In 1 ft
DETAIL 6-4
RIPRAP INLET STABILIZATION
(Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground �__
Ground
dD
Tuck Geotextile
Geotextile B a Minimum of lft
(n'P)
Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
cc d = 2.0 Ft.
cc
B= 2.0 Ft. LENGTH = 10 FT �o -
Type of Liner= CL B Rip -Rap, Keyed -In 1 ft N
FROM STA. 34+91 OFFSET 72 FT -L- RT FROM STA. 36+66 OFFSET 58 FT -L- LT -
cn
m
o m
Ln
w u,
RIPRAP INLET STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL 6-4
�{� 6 TONS CL B RIPRAP
12 SY GEOTEXTILE
L25 M
I -L- + 07.00 �
184.50' LT
2SFD 174.00' LT
❑� /2
{} L +23 00 a�
QO
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
HL-0008/
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
6
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
s 3s�DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
/3/o U
/ NLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
Office of: [CSUMMIT 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
oro•N ua ia•INQiwa• . [phone]
[phone] (FAX)
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 6
® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
- - U
\ i ❑ 184.00' LT
C ❑ cn 163.00' LT GAR 1 c❑ PEGGY ARNOLD co
0 co ❑ WB 10-E PG 3304 ❑ i /4
} -L- +68.00 DB 2665 PG 341
1 27.00' LT JAMES GODWIN o
87°27'
-L- +77.00 PEGGY I �❑ 221. DB 6727 PG 807 0rq
176.00' LT 1 ARNOLD I ISFD ,� /.3 BM 1982 PG 305 N M
P B 3304 X ❑
DURWOOD BALL II � � o � AMA LI IT SHED � °
DB 2455 z �,� R RSHIP OF N /'! MTL z
DB 13823 PG 321 PG 248 �" N w -L- +9 .00 13296 PG 2616 CAN ❑WELL
BM 2013 PG 499 1 � - I 118.00' T
❑ _ w�� G R I X8" IRON
7.0 6 �n I 9.00 98. 0'1 LT t C O
❑ 7`- 1 4.0 Y T �-L- + 4 .0 I + 71. T I °�
J 1 70.00' L. I - - - - EX I �i r�H
�_ TR °
-L- +68.52 ❑ �i -LET+" 00 �W ❑��� /� ,'/ �GR \ �11 J / ❑ (�
60.00' LT I o EX\ a O 01 -L- +86.00 15" IBC HIV J
-L- I J / + -L- o - - II w Q
EX. RYW8.00 9 -L- ++9 �, / EX ISFD E� 98.00' LT o / �
7 .00 LT.00 i i LU o I W EX 0�0WLT
`� +9 00 o I O CONC I i 58.00' LT � /
I REMOVE EX. RiW E in /
U / v l REMOVE - / o
EXISTING R/W E E ROTECTION E E FFIIB E� / REMOVE � o R E EIP E
- - - -_�WFO- - - �- -- - --r n-T F0- - - - -
15" RCP -IV 0 60
0
v 15" RCP* ` r 60
- - -
IF
180.00' POWERLINE EASE MENT
- PU E �l E �� '^P� 4� PU E
BM 2013 PG 9
I cal
I I
I 1
I 1
I
I
1 I
I 1
1 I
log
❑
BM#2
50.00' RT
Ne 687,139
Eo 2,097,890
ED
-BL- STA 23+79.00
Ln
0/S 197 RIGHT
M
�,
ELEV.::: 380.00'
TIE IN ASE
BENOF
Iz
8" MAPLH E
- -Y2 - Sto. 14 *87.701
-L- Sto. 28 +60.88
-
29
MARION WEST, JR. & DONNA WEST
DB 5963 PG 805
-M
N 2A O �2
2�
Pl Sto 29 +30.00
Z =
0. 3/' 52./" (RT)
D =
0. 3/' /5./"
L =
10/.97'
T =
50.99'
R =
//,000.00'
SE
= NC
RO
= N/A
+
- � O . O g � matte �r�.��. • i"` --_, � • -
�'� � � �zeaa�•�
ice -
is
ON
1. �1� • ice: E-
�: 1 : : - 1. • /
11�!
.: .
��
1.
_�'I
1
•
,
y y_7r 7r 7ry
50' GA EASMENT
DB 8 31 Pq 25 RIPRAP LIN "AIL.ITCH
SEED A 6-3 E�
I 12TONS CL B RIP P
SY GEOTEXTIL ❑
I 9 CY OF EXC ION
I r,
I
-L- + 61.00 .9
MARY T BALL PROPERTIES LLC 97.00' RT86
C
DB 15114 PG 50
2782 .00RT m
.00' RT
TRACT EIGHT I
pUE
I
❑ I
I
l,l
I
\ ❑I
ISFD
❑
1 1
L- + 50.0
85.00' RT
-L-
73.0
55.00
' RT
\
-
❑
67.50' RT
C
I
67.4
' RT
]BEGIN C/A
-L- + 12.
m
�� I -L- + 00.00
67.50' RT
-L- + 07.00
m
m
°
-L- +
67.50'
3.00
RT
-
150.00' RT
15" RCP -IV
PROP R/W N i
-L- + 04.08 -L- + 3.96 NC i z v
7.50' RT = 73.00' RT Co
- -L- + 60.00 -L- + 81.00
2 TONS CL PRAP -a (� 82.00' RT 82.00' RT N
0 1 7 SY GEOT XTI E m O 67.00' RT 67.00' RT o
L- + 01.17L- + 13.11 u'
0 85.00' RT CON 33 67.00' RT rn
-L- + 98.00 C f
104.00 RT
m
-L- +15.00
237.00' RT
-L- +31.00
236.00' RT
-°
pUE
-L- + 32.00
256.50' RT
-L- + 16.00
-L- + 47.00
257.50' RT
274.00' RT
246.00' RT
MARY BALL
-L- +78.00
268.00' RT
WB 08-E PG
500
BM 2009 PG
1005
2SFD --- -L- +27.00
} JAMES, JR. & DAVILENE KING s5.00' RT
{� DB 6202 PG 128 15" RCP -IV
f� s
SEPTIC REPAIR FIELD'
SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD 32
LEE & CAROLINE WILLIS
DB 13707 PG 1112
BM 2009 PG 1005
S 02°27'08" W
189.38'
w
1- "
of aJ
wti
0- N X
SUN
0-
�I-
J v U
a
<LnOf
m
m
I- Q
i
a
S 02°25'43" W
104.84' EIP
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8 & 9
FOR -Y2- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 10
FOR INTERSECTION DETAILS SEE SHEET 213-2

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
TYPE
ALLOWABLE
MITIGABLE
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
ROAD
CROSSING
BRIDGE
PARALLEL
IMPACT
ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft)
TOTAL
(ft)
ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft)
TOTAL
(ft)
ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft)
1
12+67 to 15+29 RT
Tail Ditch / Roadway Fill
X
2170
4044
6214
2
15+29 to 18+66 RT
Pipe Removal & Installation / Roadway Fill
X
8804
1530
10334
3
22+99 to 25+65 LT & RT
Pond Drainage / Roadway Fill
X
9043
4852
13895
4
35+80 to 37+40 LT
30" RCP Extension / Rip Rap Inlet Stabilization
X
3154
1704
4858
5
52+56 to 53+21 LT
Pipe Outlet Channel Stabilization
X
2366
1465
3831
TOTALS:
14563
1 8021
22584
10974
5574
16548
0
0
NOTES:
3

CE-DIST-CIA

Type III Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
A. Project Description:
H L-00081
49367.1.9
as:
The N.C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from
Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884) in Wake County. See
Figure 1 for the Vicinity Map.
The project is included in the 2024-2033 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) under the
HL-0008 TIP, and HL-0008I was added to the 2020-2029 STIP under Item N of the Board of
Transportation addendum in May 2023. The project is programmed in the 2020-2029 STIP with Block
Grant Direct Allocation (BGDA) federal funds.
Old Stage Road is currently a two-lane, undivided, rural road that extends from US 401 on the south
side of Raleigh to the Wake/Johnston County line. This corridor has a mixture of land uses, ranging from
rural agricultural to small residential subdivisions, and is experiencing accelerated growth between the
City of Raleigh and Town of Garner. Old Stage Road is a likely alternate route for either NC 50 or
US 401 travelers. Old Stage Road is classified as a minor arterial from Rolling Meadow Drive to Banks
Road, and as a major collector at the Rock Service Station Road intersection and southward. The posted
speed limit throughout the project study area is 45 miles per hour (mph). See Figure 2 for the Project
Study Area.
The existing two-lane roadway would be widened to four 12-foot lanes, two northbound and two
southbound, with a 17.5-foot raised median and a 2-foot gutter with 6-inch curb. See Figure 3 for the
proposed Typical Section and Figure 4 for the Environmental Features Map with the project study area.
Improvements also include shifting the Old Stage Road at Rock Service Station Road intersection further
south to realign the skew of the intersection to 90 degrees, reconfiguring the through movement to better
serve north -south traffic, and converting this intersection to a signalized intersection. The intersection at
Banks Road would be converted to a reduced conflict intersection (RCI), prohibiting left turns from Banks
Road onto Old Stage Road. A northbound left turn lane onto Banks Road would be added to Old Stage
Road as well. The project would require additional right of way, and temporary construction easements
would be utilized as needed. Utility relocations and drainage easements are also anticipated which can
result in additional permanent or temporary impacts. See Figure 5 for the Public Meeting Map.
B. Description of Need and Purpose:
The project's purpose is to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow on Old Stage Road. The Old
Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection is currently failing to move traffic through the
area. Notable delays at this intersection (219 seconds) have vehicular queue lengths of 1,100 feet in the
AM peak hours. The intersection is operating with significant delays and operational deficiencies which
will worsen over time with the anticipated growth in this region of Wake County.
C. Categorical Exclusion (CE) Action Classification:
Type III
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 1

D. Proposed Improvements:
N/A for a Type III CE
E. Special Project Information:
Current Traffic
Old Stage Road — 2022 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) —
• Tractor Trailer Semi -truck (TTST) = 0%
• Dual Axle Truck (Dual) = 4%
Rock Service Station Road — 2022 AADT 8,700 vpd
• TTST = 1 %
• Dual = 4%
Banks Road — 2022 AADT — 6,700 vpd
• TTST = 1 %
• Dual = 4%
Design Standards:
Design Speed: 50 mph
Posted Speed: 45 mph
Functional Classification: Minor arterial
Project Schedule:
Right of way: October 9, 2023
Construction: March 2025
15,400 vehicles per day (vpd)
Estimated Costs:
Current cost estimates, based on the preliminary design NCDOT 2023 market prices, are as follows:
Right of Way: $ 2,412,000
Utilities: $ 404,000
Construction: $ 9,300,000
Total: $ 12,116,000
Tribal Coordination:
NCDOT sent a tribal coordination letter to the Catawba Indian Nation on January 21, 2022. The Catawba
Indian Nation responded on February 25, 2022, noting no immediate concerns with the proposed project.
However, the Catawba should be notified if Native American artifacts and/or human remains are located
during the ground disturbance phase of this project.
Cultural Resources:
Historic Architecture
On December 19, 2022, the NCDOT Architectural Historian found that a survey is required for Historic
Architecture and Landscapes. County GIS/tax materials and other visuals, like Google Maps
"Streetview," clearly illustrate the relative placement of the resources and the proposed work and
indicate the need for field investigation and eligibility evaluation of the B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214)
property. On May 8, 2023, the State Historic Preservation Office concurred with the eligibility
recommendation that the Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812), erroneously labeled as the B. N. Ferrell
House, at #10133 Old Stage Road (PIN: 0698862235) is not eligible for listing in the National Register
of Historic Places due to loss of historical integrity through alterations to its physical features and
character. Therefore, a Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Historic Properties Present or
Affected Form was completed for the project on May 9, 2023.
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 2

Archaeology
On February 23, 2022, the NCDOT Archaeologist concluded the archaeological survey and evaluation
with a finding of "No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Present
or Affected."
Natural Resources:
Jurisdictional Resources
The project is located within the Neuse River Basin and is subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules. Five ponds and two stream features are present in the project study area. The area flows into
Panther Branch and Little Creek, which are class C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) of the State. A
site investigation was conducted on October 13, 2021 for the original study area and a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination was provided on January 7, 2022. A site investigation for the expanded
study area was conducted on October 11, 2022 with no additional resources identified.
All five ponds are subject to the buffer rules. Stream B is intermittent and connects Ponds D and E
through a 24-inch pipe under Old Stage Road. Stream B is not subject to the buffer rules. Stream C is
intermittent and jurisdictional on the west side of Old Stage Road and is ephemeral and non -jurisdictional
on the east side of Old Stage Road. Stream C is identified on the Wake County Soil Survey map. On
October 6, 2020, NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) determined that Stream C will not be subject
to buffer protection. No wetland features were identified in the study area.
A stream, located at Rolling Meadow Drive on the north end of the project and not included as part of
this delineation, is impacted by the R-2828 NC 540 project and is permitted under NC 540 associated
impacts. If additional work is needed on the north end and this project results in impacts to the permitted
stream, impacts will be accounted for in the HL-0008I project.
Table 1 shows all stream and pond impact calculations based on preliminary design and are subject to
change during final design stages. A 25-foot buffer from the construction slope stakes around the
jurisdictional resource is used. Actual impacts are anticipated to be less.
Table 1. Jurisdictional Impacts
Resource
Linear Feet
Acres
Buffer Zone 1
Acres
Buffer Zone 2
Acres
Total Buffer
Impact Acres
Stream B
0 (piped)-
-
-
-
Stream C
339
-
-
-
-
Pond A
-
-
-
-
-
Pond B
-
0.21
0.28
0.23
0.51
Pond C
-
-
0.04
0.11
0.15
Pond D
-
0.06
0.15
0.13
0.28
Pond E
-
0.03
0.11
0.12
0.23
TOTAL
339
0.30
-
-
1.17
Protected Species
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
lists six species that are potentially affected by activities at the project study area (Table 2). Two bat
species were included in the table for reporting purposes and are not listed in IPaC.
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 3

Table 2. ESA federally protected species listed' for Wake County
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat'
E
N/A
MA-LAA2
Perimyotis subflavus
Tricolored bat
E*
Yes
Unresolved
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Yes
No Effect
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River waterdog
T
No
MA-NLAA4
Notorus furiosus
Carolina madtom
E
No
MA-NLAA4
Fusconaia mason'
Atlantic pigtoe
T
No
MA-NLAA
lasmidonta hererodon
Dwarf wedgemussel
E
No
MA-NLAA
Elliptic lanceolate
Yellow lance
T
No
MA-NLAA
E— Endangered, T— Threatened, E* - Proposed to be listed as endangered, MA-LAA — May affect, likely to adversely affect,
MA-NLAA — May affect but not likely to adversely affect.
1 IPaC checked on 711312023. Northern long-eared bat is not listed in iPaC.
2 Note that the project will not require the project to adhere to M&R 3 since planning was initiated before May 5, 2023.
3 On September 14, 2022, the U.S. Fish and WIIdlife Service announced a proposal to list the tricolored bat (Perimyotis
subflavus - PESU) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Given the proposal to list PESU as Federally
Endangered, NCDOT and its federal partners, FHWA and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) are initiating a
conference programmatic consultation to address impacts to this species. USFWS has not provided an official effective listing
date, but it is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2023. Upon listing, USFWS is expected to provide habitat descriptions
and an area of influence/distribution range for PESU. When this information is provided, it will help to inform NCDOT's
determinations on habitat that could be impacted by NCDOT actions. If listed, NCDOT will resolve Section 7 prior to project
construction as appropriate.
4 The project will adhere to all applicable Conservation Measures and Monitoring and Reporting Requirements — Monitoring
and Reporting #2 and #3 as outlined in the aquatic mussel Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) and the Neuse River
waterdog and Carolina madtom PBO.
Bald eagle
Bald eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No known Natural Heritage
Program (NHP) occurrences exist in the vicinity of the project study area. There are no large trees
sufficient for an eagle's nest, nor were any nests or birds observed during the site visit. Therefore, based
on lack of habitat, this project will not impact this species.
Northern long-eared Bat
The USFWS has revised the previous PBO in conjunction with the FHWA, the USACE, and NCDOT for
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina (December 15,
2022). The revised PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT
projects and activities. Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are currently only
known to occur in 27 counties but may potentially occur in 3 additional counties within Divisions 1-8
(note: Division 5 is not located within any of these 30 counties). NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have
agreed to two Conservation Measures which will avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These
Conservation Measures only apply to the 30 current known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the
Revised PBO and do not include any parts of Division 5. NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to
three Monitoring and Reporting Requirements to monitor the impacts of incidental take.
All projects in Division 5 where planning has commenced after May 5, 2023 must adhere only to
Monitoring and Reporting Requirement 3. This requirement does not apply to this project since planning
commenced before May 5, 2023.
The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely
Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for ten years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in
Divisions 1-8. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a final listing
determination through December 31, 2030.
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 4

Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations
As part of Stage 11M1, the NCDOT Integrated Mobility Division (IMD) recommended a shared use facility
as is mentioned in local and regional plans. In accordance with this recommendation, the project
originally proposed to construct a 10-foot multi -use path on the eastern side of Old Stage Road, and a
5-foot sidewalk on the western side of Old Stage Road. However, coordination with Wake County to
determine the cost -share and maintenance responsibilities for these facilities determined that County
maintenance of the sidewalk and multi -use path are not available at this time.
Public Involvement
November 2022 Outreach
On November 1, 2022, there were 280 postcards mailed to property owners in the area surrounding the
project. The postcard provided a general description of the project and included details for the public
meeting held on November 17, 2022. The postcard also directed recipients to the project website for
additional information and invited them to provide their input. Comments were also accepted via email,
by phone, or by returning paper comment forms by mail.
The public meeting was held on November 17, 2022 at Holland's United Methodist Church at
9433 Ten -Ten Road in Raleigh from 5pm to 7pm. Approximately 70 people attended the public meeting
to view the preliminary design maps, ask the project team questions, and provide feedback. Attendees
were given handouts providing project information and maps, as well as a paper comment form.
Comment forms were collected at the meeting and afterwards.
From November 1, 2022 to December 15, 2022, 35 people submitted comments or questions about the
project either online, by email, comment form, or by telephone. Comments received included concerns
regarding left turns from Banks Road onto Old Stage Road and the recommendation of a turn lane
and/or stoplight. Other comments include the need for widening on Old Stage Road to US 401, and the
lack of need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity. As a result of public input and
subsequent coordination with the project team, the Banks Road intersection will be converted to a
reduced -conflict intersection (RCI) to improve safety and mobility through the area.
Four related individuals provided emails and comment forms regarding impacts to specific properties
mainly at the intersection of Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road. Information was provided
to some of the individuals via an in -person meeting or phone call with NCDOT Division 5 staff. Most of
the concerns were related to the Old Stage Road and Banks Road intersection, the Voluntary
Agricultural District (VAD), location of the U-turn bulb, and access to their property. NCDOT will continue
coordination to reduce impacts to the VAD parcel, residential structure, and farming operations.
F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:
F3. Type III Actions
Proposed improvement(s) that fit Type III Actions (NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement, Appendix
C) answer questions below.
• NCDOT will certify the Categorical Exclusion for FHWA approval.
• If any questions are marked "Yes" then additional information will be required for those questions in
Section G.
Yes
No
Does the project involve potential effects to Threatened or Endangered species
1
listed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries
Q
❑
Service NMFS ?
2
Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and Golden
Q
Eagle Protection Act BGEPA ?
❑
3
Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
Q
reason, following appropriate ublic involvement?
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 5

4
Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to low-
❑
Q
income and/or minority populations?
5
Does the project involve substantial residential or commercial displacements or
Q
❑
right of way acquisition?
6
Does the project include a determination under Section 4(f)?
❑
Q
7
Is a project -level analysis for direct, indirect, or cumulative effects required based
❑
Q
on the NCDOT community studies screening tool?
8
Does the project impact anadromous fish spawning waters?
❑
Q
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW),
9
High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas, 303(d)-listed
Q
❑
impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)?
10
Does the project impact Waters of the United States in any of the designated
❑
Q
mountain trout streams?
11
Does the project require a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
❑
Q
Section 404 Permit?
12
Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
❑
Q
Commission FERC licensed facility?
Does the project include Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
13
(NHPA) effects determination other than a No Effect, including archaeological
❑
Q
remains?
14
Does the project involve GeoEnvironmental Sites of Concerns such as gas
Q
❑
stations, dry cleaners, landfills, etc.?
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely effecting a regulatory
15
floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) elevations of a
❑
Q
water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650 subpart
A?
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and substantially
16
affects the coastal zone and/or any Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑
Q
Type III Actions (continued)
Yes
No
17
Does the project require a US Coast Guard (USCG) permit?
❑
Q
18
Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
❑
Q
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area?
19
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resource Act (CBRA) resources?
❑
Q
20
Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. US Forest Service (USFS), US Fish and
❑
Q
Wildlife Service (USFWS), etc.) or Tribal (Trust) Lands?
21
Does the project involve any changes in access control or the modification or
❑
Q
construction of an interchange on an interstate?
22
Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
❑
Q
community cohesiveness?
23
Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption?
❑
Q
24
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP, and where applicable, the Metropolitan
❑
Q
Planning Organization's (MPO's) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)?
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 6

Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of Section 6(f)
of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act,
25
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, TVA, Tribal Lands, or other unique
Q
❑
areas or special lands that were acquired in fee or easement with public -use
money and have deed restrictions or covenants on the property?
26
Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) buyout
❑
Q
properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)?
27
Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy?
Q
❑
28
Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by the
Q
❑
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)?
29
Is the project in an Air Quality non -attainment or maintenance area for a National
Q
❑
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)?
30
Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that
❑
Q
affected the project decision?
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 7

G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F (ONLY for questions marked `Yes'):
Question 1 — Threatened and Endangered Species
For the NLEB, the project will not require adherence to Monitoring and Reporting Requirement 3 since
planning was initiated before May 5, 2023.
Once information is provided from USFWS on the Tricolored bat, the information will help to inform
NCDOT's determinations on habitat that could be impacted by NCDOT actions. If listed, NCDOT will
resolve Section 7 prior to project construction as appropriate.
Using NCDOT's Programmatic Biological Opinions, a biological conclusion of May Affect- Not Likely
to Adversely Affect is determined for the aquatic species: Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom,
Yellow lance, Dwarf wedgemussel, and Atlantic pigtoe. The project will adhere to all applicable
Conservation Measures and Monitoring and Reporting Requirements — Monitoring and Reporting #2
and #3 as outlined in the aquatic mussel Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) and the Neuse River
waterdog and Carolina madtom PBO.
Question 5 — Relocations and Right of Way
Two residential properties will be relocated with the current preliminary design. See Appendix for the
relocation report. These properties are located at 9901 Old Stage Road and 9801 Old Stage Road.
Impacts are greater on the east side of Old Stage Road due to the widening and U-turn bulbs
occurring mostly on the east side. For this reason, right of way impacts on the east side are greater.
Impacts on the west side of Old Stage Road are mostly due to construction easements for driveway
tie-ins and widening the turning radius at the Banks Road intersection and Rolling Meadow Road
intersection. Right of way impacts also include berms on each side of Old Stage Road [previously
used for the 5-foot sidewalk and 10-foot multi -use path (MUP), but no longer are included in the
design]. Additional right of way is needed at the Rock Service Station Road intersection that is being
realigned to the south. Right of way acquisition and relocations are not disproportionate in low-income
and minority areas. Furthermore, no census tracts or block groups in the study area met the NCDOT
thresholds for low-income or minority populations.
Question 9 — Buffer Rules
This project is within the Neuse River Basin. Riparian buffer impacts shall be avoided and minimized
to the greatest extent possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B.0714. New development activities located
in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas within the basin shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC .02B .0295. Buffer mitigation may be required for
buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as "allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of
Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require a variance under the Buffer Rules. A buffer mitigation
plan, including use of the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services, must be provided to the DWR
prior to approval of the Water Quality Certification.
Riparian buffer impacts are shown in Table 1.
Question 14 — Geoenvironmental Sites of Concern
One site of concern (Community Mart —10128 Old Stage Road) was identified within the project study
area. Low monetary and scheduling impacts are anticipated. Sites of concern should be reviewed
by the NCDOT GeoEnvironmental Section once the final right of way plans are complete to determine
if Phase II investigations and right of way recommendations are necessary prior to right of way being
acquired.
Question 25 — Voluntary Agricultural District
One 32-acre farm within the Direct Community Impact Area participates in the Wake County Voluntary
Agricultural District program: Wake County VAD 0698868036 located at 10133 Old Stage Road. The
VAD will be impacted by right-of-way acquisition and land within the VAD may be temporarily
converted to non-agricultural use. A turn -around, bulb -out for southbound vehicles turning to go north
would encroach on a portion of the VAD property. The proposed right of way and berm width result
in impacts to the VAD property frontage as well (although the multi -use path has been removed from
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 8

the project, the project footprint has remained the same). Right of way frontage impacts on this
property are anticipated. If right-of-way will need to be acquired from the VAD property through
eminent domain, the Wake County VAD Ordinance requires that the Wake County Agricultural
Advisory Board hold a public hearing on the proposed condemnation before condemnation may be
initiated, or other specific provision of that county's enabling ordinance. Any VAD lands converted to
non-agricultural use as part of a temporary construction easement must be returned to farmable
condition by the project's completion.
Question 27 — Traffic Noise Study
No traffic noise abatement measures were assessed in this preliminary traffic noise analysis and
therefore, all noise abatement measures are considered to be "unlikely" to be installed for the project.
Unless modifications to the project preliminary design occur, including consideration of additional
alternative alignments and/or changes to predicted Design Year 2045 traffic volumes, no traffic noise
abatement measures are recommended for detailed analysis during final design, and no noise
abatement measures are proposed for incorporation into the project. This analysis completes the
traffic noise requirements of the Title 23 CFR Part 772 and NCDOT Traffic Noise Policy.
Question 28 — Prime and Important Farmland Soils
Prime and important farmland soils are located within the project study area. However, this area is in
an urbanized boundary and not subject to the provisions of the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
Question 29 — Air Quality Maintenance
The project is in Wake County, which is within the Raleigh -Durham -Chapel Hill nonattainment area
for the prior 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as defined by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This area was designated nonattainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone standard effective June 15, 2004. However, due to improved monitoring data, this area
was redesignated maintenance on December 26, 2007. EPA approved a SIP revision for the removal
of Federal low-reid vapor pressure requirement effective on February 3, 2014. The Raleigh -Durham -
Chapel Hill area was attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS resulting in the 1997 ozone NAAQS
being revoked on April 6, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit in South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. District v. EPA ("South Coast II," 882
F.3d 1138) held that transportation conformity determinations must be made in areas that were either
nonattainment or maintenance for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and attainment for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS when the 1997 ozone NAAQS was revoked. Transportation conformity for plans and TIPs
for the 1997 Ozone NAAQS can be demonstrated without a regional emissions analysis pursuant to
40 CFR 93.109(c). The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2050 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2020-2029 STIP conform to the intent of the SIP. The USDOT
made a conformity determination on the MTP on March 21, 2022 and the TIP on March 21, 2022.
The current conformity determination is consistent with the final conformity rule found in 40 CFR Parts
51 and 93. There are no significant changes in the project design concept or scope as used in the
conformity analyses.
This TIP project is scheduled for adoption in August 2023 in the MPO's MTP Amendment as project
A137b1, a four -lane facility extending from NC 540 to Rock Service Station Road. These
improvements are included in R-2828 and are reflected in MTP project F6 in the current 2050 MTP.
The project is included in the Triangle Regional Model (TRMG2) and the MPO's AQ process. The
project is included in the 2020-2029 STIP as of June 2023.
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 9

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Widen Old Stage Road (S.R. 1006) from Rock Service Station Road (S.R. 2736) to Rolling
Meadows Drive (S.R. 3884)
T.I.P Number: HL-00081
Wake County
Federal Aid Number: TBD
WBS: 49367.1.9
COMMITMENTS FROM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN
EAU — ECAP - Section 7 Endangered Species Act — Conservation Measures for Aquatic Species
All environmental commitments included in the aquatic mussel Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/
Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic
Biological/Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1,
2021) and Programmatic Biological Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/ Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse
River waterdog in NCDOT Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (August 3, 2021), will be adhered to during final design and construction of the project. A complete
list of environmental commitments associated with design and construction for this project will be attached to the full environmental permit
package.
Right of Way - Voluntary Agricultural District (VAD) Property
Wake County VAD 0698868036, located at 10133 Old Stage Road, participates in the Wake County VAD program. Right of way frontage impacts
on this property are anticipated. If right-of-way will need to be acquired from the VAD property through eminent domain, the Wake County VAD
Ordinance requires that the Wake County Agricultural Advisory Board hold a public hearing on the proposed condemnation before condemnation
may be initiated, or other specific provision of that county's enabling ordinance. Any VAD lands converted to non-agricultural use as part of a
temporary construction easement must be returned to farmable condition by the project's completion. Continuous coordination with the VAD
property owner is recommended.
COMMITMENTS FROM PERMITTING
No commitments developed during project permitting.
*****END OF PROJECT COMMITMENTS*****

Categorical Exclusion Approval:
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
Prepared By:
07/31/2023
vaLc
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
07/31/2023
Date
■
H L-00081
49367.1.9
:D
—DocuSigne�dby:
�'/I'
Elizabeth Workman, Senior Transportation Planner
Three Oaks Engineering
Zahid Baloch, PE, NCDOT Division 5
—DocuSiig��nned�'by: e
2.t" D
Zahid Baloch, PE, NCDOT Division 5, Senior Project Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
• If NO grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2
Approved and 3), NCDOT approves the Type I or Type II
Categorical Exclusion.
• If ANY grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2
Certified and 3), NCDOT certifies the Type I or Type II
07/31/2023
UdIC
Categorical Exclusion for FHWA approval.
• If classified as Type III Categorical Exclusion.
DocuSigned by:
Beth Quinn, PhD, PE, Division Team Lead
for Brandon Jones, PE, Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature required.
DocuSigned by:
08/01/2023 E��
FOFnr,FSnngF-14c7 Date for Edward Parker, PE, Acting Division
Federal Highway Administration
ministrator
Note: Prior to ROW or Construction authorization, a consultation maybe required (please see
Section Vll of the NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement for more details).
v2019.1 HL-00081 Type 111 CE Page 10

M
Legend 0
a Scone
Garner, yte'�r H
Project Study Area °" Rd
Future NC 540 Alignment Seastone St gtageCwestD
r�
uay-Varina d ,A
Ten Ten [�
N
Rd
F3ani'$ Rd
Tr
m
co
a
a
�tpasthaYen Dr o
pc °7
rorry of kv rn
0
K
Project Location
a
n
n H2
X
a 4
wS
7
w
Harvey Jenson Rd
K
T
e� re" Rey
Rd
try
5
V
w
0 0.5 1
v
t
Miles >x
�F NORTH VICINITY MAP County: WAKE
�� 9tlo WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006)
N 9 NORTH NA FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD SR 2736 Div: s STIP#HL Figure
DEPARTMENT
() -0008
'
o OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS MS: 4
gT�'FN"OF TRANSQ°m WAKE COUNTY 93 77.1.9
NORTH CAROLINA Date: MARCH 2O23

•%
s ,
Legend
;ea Project Study Area
Parcel Boundary t
7 fe
Cox.:;; a � � -��•
41
�.: 7'1
.
IL
i■i_� i
� �r ��B_ank-s7Rd
\m1 rt" 11
� td9e�in� • � . �
.100
Feet
of NORTH fq STUDY AREA MAP County: WAKE
WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006)
N 9 NORTH NA FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD SR 2736 Div: 5 ST P#HL-0008 Figure
' DEPARTMMENTENT ( )
o OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WBS: 49367.1 .9 2
gT�'FNrovTRANSQ°m WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date: MARCH 2O23

10' 17 5' 15'
12 LANE 12 LANE 12 LANE 12 LANE
GRASS BERM RAISED MEDIAN GRASS BERM
2' CURB 'i 2' CURB
& GUTTER � I � � &GUTTER
�F NORTIJ qQ TYPICAL SECTION ICounty: WAKE
�� 9tlo WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006)
N 9 NORTH NA FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD SR 2736 Div: s -0008 STIP#HL Figure
DEPARTMENT
() '
o OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WBS: 493 77.1.9 3
gT�'FNrovTRANSQ°m WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date: JUNE 2023

This stream is included
in the NC 540 project.
6, kil
Stream C
Legend
Project Study Area
Underground Storage
Tank
Delineated Hydro
Features
Parcel Boundary
I
®nomczw_1 0 ..
. g_ank`slRd` ' ...
Stream B (Piped)
� Pond D
Pond E
4.
,� � � Back Field Rd
• �•' Pond B �►"-
Pond C
X.
i
-SYa eline Dr `Aa,X`
+
0 500 1,000
Feet r �` �'► _
�F,,ORTH,4 ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES MAP County: WAKE
�� 9tlo WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006)
N 9 NORTH NA FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD SR 2736 Div: 5 ST P#HL-0008 Figure
DEPARTMENT
( '
o OF TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WBS: 49367.1 .9 4
gT�'FNrovTRANSQ°m WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA Date: MARCH 2O23

0-
0-
—Y/ -
d� Ar` -V l - c+., In -Lnn nn
s
V)
Z
O
Lu
w
C
Ln
rr)J
CATHERINE RACKLEY
DB 13823 PG 303
BM 2018 PG 888
ANNETTE ATKINSON /
DB 17149 PG 2076 a
BM 2018 PG 888
R
CATHERINE RACKLEY
DB 13823 PG 303 E
BM 2018 PG 888
WILLIAM & CATHERINE
RACKLEY
\E�DB 2168 PG 157
L a W
ID
F
0
C)
oO
C)
pT —Vl— Ct., //-477 l0
TIMOTHY & ROBERT BRYAN
DB 15205 PG 1102
BM 2002 PG 1878
PI Sto /0 f66.71
Z� = 0° OF 11.2" (LT)
D = 0° 06' 08.In
L = 133.42'
T = 66.7/'
R = 56,028.76'
l- / -')TO /U tbJ./ J
z�s
= 66° 01' 49.1" (RT )
D
= 7/° 37' 11.0"
L =
92.20'
T
= 51.98'
R
= 80.00'
PI Sto 14f08.2/
Z� = 25° 25' 08.0" (RT )
D = 7° 32' 20.In
L = 337.17'
T = 171.40'
R = 760.00'
SE = 06
RO = SEE PLANS
DS = 45 MPH
—VI A—
l- / JTo 11 tb/.D q
Z�
= 10° 17' 04.6" (LT )
D
= 10° 00' 22.3"
L =
102.78'
T
= 5 /. 5 3'
R
= 572.60'
i tsM cucu ru iytsi o
S� BM 2020 PG 1482
_ / a i jOHNNY BYNUM JK.& AMY BYNUM
DB 18449 PG 512
BM 2020 PG 1481
c Qa �� BM 2020 PG 1482
PI Sto 14 f49.03
L = 2/3.10'
T = 106.57'
PT —L— Sta. /5 f55.57 R = 5,000.00'
\ SE = RC
RO = 84'
-')TO ILtZ1J.J
= 6° 06' 42.8" (LT )
D
= 34° 12' 23.2"
L =
17.87'
T
= 8.94'
R
= 167.50'
—YIA— Sta.12 f25.00
T —L— Sta. 20 f95.12
PI Sto 19 f 36.35 I
z�s = 25° 53' 45.9" (RT )
D = 8° 00' 48.2"
L = 325.16'
T = 164.39'
R = 7/5.00'
SE = 04
RO = 168'
DS = 45 MPH
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0008/ 1 5
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R / W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the NC FIRM LICENSE No: R-0339
Office of: [tSUMMIT 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
oroaN ua iaalNQiwaa mmm— c919) 732-3883
c919) 732-6676 (FAX)
SR 1006 (OLD STAGE RD) /-L- (ROCK SERVICE STATION RD) INTERSECTION
2022 ADT
2045 ADT •
REST & MARSHA BALL
DB 7806 PG 504
BM 2016 PG 1645
FORREST & MARSHA BALL
DB 7806 PG 504
BM 2016 PG 1645
300 -L-
400 OLD STAGE RD
8400
15900
W
W W
J
Z
v
Q
FIGURE 5b
PAVEMENT
REMOVAL
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8
FOR -YI- & -YIA- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 10
FOR INTERSECTION DETAILS SEE SHEET 213-1

0-
\
V)
Z
0
w
c9
C-
�Q
N 1
-'T-0
N�-
O 1
co
zCD
OD
N
DALVIS CONERLY
DB 17816 PG 2410 0
BM 1993 PG 1100 w
----------�-C,-�;-
04°56'33" E D� I
129.06'
/ I I
IIII 1I�
JAME S EPHENSON `
WB 0 -E PG 275 I IIII
BM 93 G 1100 I II
\ I I m
I x
\ �\ 60 Z z
c�
\03z
(-n �I I
\ I
11II
GARAGE I No I I
I
� III I I
I
[N\ II
T
FTI
' I
0
O
0
O
ISFD
NC
IN
BANKS
CEMETERY
/0
BEGIN CONSTR
-Y2 - Sto. l2 +51
S 20 2s'gq„ W
09,
rr1 S 09°26'37" W
m 143°35'
S 08°47'24" W
349.35'
cn
_ co
N 6l
o
CA
N p
r*m
N 01°48'49" E
199.36,
cn
m
o m
w u,
0
L,
Ln
m
II
PC -L- Sto. 28 +79.02
I
DURWOOD BALL DURW D BALL I I
I DB 13823 PG 321 I DB 823 PG 321
BM 2002 PG 1877
I
BM 2013 PG 150 CULTIVATED 2002 PG 1877 I DURWOOD BALL
BM 2013 PG 499 FIELD BM 2013 PG 150
DB 13823 PG 321
I I �
I I
I I I
I III �
QC
\
I F o_
F—�
BM 2013 PG 499
BM 2013 PG 499
I
I
80.00' POWERLINE EASEMENT
BM 2002 PG 1877
499
IN
I2
i
BM 2013 PG
o
Im
J
m I=
-Tjm
�:
I�
N
N
II
a N
c
GA EASEMENT
9
co
o
II
1
50'
DB 8 31 PG132
z
9
II
t] �
� �
I
� �
I
BY3-311 007 EXISTING R/W
o
ROT�CTION�—
— —
— _
F� i
- —+— — —T FO— —
— — — — —
— —
—T—T
FO— — — — — — —
— }
H — — —TV— —
mow 4 T F O — —
_ o EXIST
CD— —T 0— — — — I— w MPTY
I
T
I I
0 1
� I I F — —
\ I C o
I �I
> } DO00
I m
II II i i GROVE
I to I I
r
l o l o
I I I I I I
I I
I I .
m an
Mti
I I 03
I I z
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
- -Y2 - Sto. 14 +87.70
-L - Sto. 28 +60.88
MARION WEST, JR. & DONNA WEST
DB 5963 PG 805
ORREST & MARSHA BALL
DB 7806 PG 504
BM 2016 PG 1645
a 6\' "I
N 2A O �2
2�
m
O�PO�RLINE EASEMENT
BBM 200013 P 4199--
o �
BM#2
Ne 687,139
E. 2,097,890
-BL- STA 23+79.00
O/S 197 RIGHT
ELEV.::: 380000'
BENCH TIE IN BASE
OF 8" MAPLE
P/ Sto 29 +30.00
Z =
0° 3/' 52./" (RT )
D =
0° 3/' /5./"
L =
10/.97'
T =
50.99'
R =
//,000.00'
SE
= NC
RO
= N/A
SR 1006 OLD STAGE RD
' N
N
Fri
1=
I�
C)
m m �— m
50' GA EASI�MENT
DB 8 31 Pq 25
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
Ln
I
I
�0 1
0-)
GAR o
co
0
J
N Im PEGGY
ARNOLD I ISFD
WB 10-E
PG 3304
DB 2455�- z
j' PG 248 N 00
PEGGY gIRNOLD
� En �' I WB 10-E PP 3304
rn
I DB 2665 IPG 341
Ow
Aj o v
Y
_
\ram I \ \ l
/ O : I
o.
o°
Nqp 83✓2011
AXLE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the S���I� NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
Office of: f 320 Executive Ct.
Hillsborough, NC 2727278
oroaN ua iaalNQiwaammcss (919 )732-3883
[phone] (FAX)
Z PiP(4),
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HL-0008/ 6
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R / W ACQUISITION
JAMES &
PHYLLIS GODWIN
DB 8266 PG 592
BIM�1982 PG 305
O
Q
JAMES GODWIN o
DB 6727 PG 807 o rq
IQ -
BM 1982 PG 305 DO M
_ N
h0 Xki� ❑ SHED 00
'00
0o N 87°27'59" W
221.68' MTL
CAN ❑WELL
GAR X8" IRON
Pati /, MARR LIMITED I'---- c�
P At C h a
`, + TDB 13296 PG 2616
r��T �R
HTR
- PPPPPP- IT -8" CHLO O_S
L ~I
RI
o GQ
RAP P
R P
I
� MARYBAPL
�..- WB 08-E G 500
BM 2009 PG 1005
o �
MARY T BALL PROPERTIES LLC
DB 15114 PG 2782
TRACT EIGHT
SR 2724 (BANKS RD) /-L- (OLD STAGE RD) INTERSECTION
2022 ADT
2045 ADT
4900
9800
0
I N
N Y I z
3600 1300
6300 �2500
15400 -L- -L- 11900
28900 OLD STAGE RD OLD STAGE RD 27300
I
o �
co
0 0
N w
O
m
PLO
/
ISFD j
0-
1101 w
a �/
I ��
CONC
6MCD o
l
�n
(/ZT
r,
Cl
co o
-- C;IP�—
— — T Fo - - - �E P L- \ M P - - - - T F 0 — — — — — —
POST POS •
u
O
'`
O
0
O
Ln
o
0
�F
v /
D RIP
-
— �
_
Y-- 3-6, - -
-
EI
EIP
o
1
m
�
I
I I
o
I I II
I I
"s
I
II
\
;�I
�.
I
ISFD
I
\�
I
LEE & CAROLINE
WILLIS
F
I
DB 13707 PG 1112
—
II
BM 2009 PG
1005
\
�co
P-
\
I
I�
I
W
�o�c
�
I
w
m
00
1
L
= JAMES, JR. &
DAVILENE KING w
L
°'
dqr
o DB 6202 PG 128
N
o
u,
CONC
I
m
} 2SFD
I
1
----
S
S 02°27'08" W
189.38'
ARY T BALL PROPERTIES L'
DB 15114 PG 2782
TRACT SIX
S 02°25'43" W N
104.84' -iP
FIGURE 5c
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8 & 9
FOR -Y2- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 10
FOR INTERSECTION DETAILS SEE SHEET 213-2
r�TJ

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
21-08-0005
Aim,
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
HL-0008I
County:
Wake
WBSNo.:
49367.1.9
Document
Federal CE
T e:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
State X Federal
Federal
Yes X No
Permit
Permits :
Typ e s :
Project Description: Widen SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) from SR 2736 (Rock Service
Station Road) to SR 3884 (Rolling Meadows Drive) (no off -site detour specified in
review request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register -listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area
of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
X There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 17 August 2021
and 17 November 2022 and yielded one SL, eight SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in the
Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE equates with the study area provided in the review
request (see attached), Wake County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax
information indicated a partly developed APE of cultivated fields and mostly residential and
several commercial and church resources dating between the 1890s to the 2020s (viewed 17
August 2021 and 17 November 2022). Eighteen pre-1970 resources (about one third of the
total) are unexceptional (many are also altered) examples of their types. Included in the pre-
1970 group are nine previously recorded resources determined not NR-eligible for the R-2721
project in 2012, and the findings for eight Houses (WA5719, WA5721 thru 5725, WA6372, and
WA6374) remain valid. The Stephenson-Sauls House (WA8812) (previously and erroneously
mapped as the B. N. Ferrell House (WA1214), now gone) had not received the full evaluation
for National Register eligibility required for project compliance purposes. The Banks Cemetery,
located on a small parcel in the NW quadrant of the Banks Road/Old Stage Road intersection
(PIN: 0698773062), is not NR-eligible, but should be afforded the usual protections during
construction.
The county architectural surveys (1988-91 and 2005-6) and related publication, as well as later
Historic Arch itechire and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 7

studies, recorded the properties in the APE noted above (Kelly Lally, The Historic Architecture of Wake
County, North Carolina (Raleigh: Wake County Government, 1994)). County GIS/tax materials and other
visuals, like Google Maps "Streetview," clearly illustrated the relative placement of the resources
and the proposed work and indicated the need for field investigation and eligibility evaluation of
the Stephenson-Sauls House property.
NCDOT contracted with MdM Historical Consultants to carry out the necessary NR eligibility
evaluation. The resultant technical report (April 2023) concludes that the Stephenson-Sauls
House (WA8812) is not eligible for listing in the National Register. HPO has reviewed the study
and concurs with the finding (see attached correspondence).
As the evaluated property is found not NR-eligible and no additional resources of concern are
located in the APE, a finding of "no historic properties present or affected" will satisfy both
Section 106 and GS 121-12(a) compliance requirements.
Should any aspect of the project design change, please notify
NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessarv.
Technical report and photographs on file at
NCDOT — Historic Architecture and NCHPO and also Connect NCDOT
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos X Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OF AFFECTED
9 May 2023
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
HL-0008I, Wake County
WBS No. 49367.1.9
PA Tracking No. 21-08-0005
May 2023
Historic Arch itechire and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 7

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
na ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES `- 1 .
p��{ " PRESENT FORM
k114 �'..
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project.
- It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult a
separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No:
F.A. No:
HL-0008I
49367.1.5
n/a
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Funding:
® Yes ❑ No
Wake
Federal CE
❑ State ® Federal
Permit Type: USACE
Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 5 is
proposing improvements to and widening of Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station
Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive. The NCDOT has established an archaeological Area
of Potential Effects (APE) that measures approximately 0.75 mile in length and encompasses
approximately 45 acres, inclusive of existing roadways and development.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
An archaeological survey and evaluation of the proposed improvements to Old Stage Road and Rock
Service Station Road was conducted during December 2021 and January 2022 by Melissa McKay,
Becky Sponseller, Kristin Doshier, and Connor Seaton of Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon).
During the course of the survey, two new archaeological sites, 31 WA2455 and 31 WA2456, were
recorded and one previously recorded archaeological site, 31WA1995, was revisited within the APE.
In addition, a small cemetery (31 WA2457) was recorded approximately 70 meters west of the APE,
and will be avoided by the project as currently planned. Because this cemetery is located well outside
of the direct APE, the site was not investigated or assessed for its NRHP eligibility, and a site
description is not included in this report. The cemetery was assigned a site trinomial and a North
Carolina Cemetery Form was completed, however.
None of the sites within the APE are recommended Eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP). It is recommended that the proposed project be allowed to proceed without concern
for impacts to significant cultural resources.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Team has reviewed
the .subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area
of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed.)
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
1of12

Project Tracking No.
21-08-0005
® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
Other:
Signed:
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
® Photos ❑Correspondence
2/23/2022
Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
2of12

Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]
February 25, 2022
Attention: Zahid Baloch
NC Department of Transportation
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Re. THPO # TCNS # Project Description
Widening of Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive
2022-193-82 in Wake Co., NC as project HL-00081
Dear Mr. Baloch,
The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questions please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
® E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT:
49367.1.9 1
COUNTY
Wake
Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
T.I.P. No.:
I HL-00081
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Intersection improvements on Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from Rock Service
Station Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES (% MINORITY = 50%)*
INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees
Owners
Tenants
Total
Minorities
0-15K
15-25K
25-35K
35-50K
50K UP
Residential
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Businesses
0
0
0
VALUE OF DWELLING
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms
0
0
Ld
0
Owners
Tenant Rent
For
Sale
For Rent
Non -Profit
0
0
0
0-100K
0
$ 0-250
0
0-100K
0
$ 0-250
0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
100-
200K
0
250-500
0
100-
200K
4
250-500
0
Yes
No
Explain all "YES" answers.
200-
300K
0
500-
1000
0
200-
300K
15
500-
1000
2
X
1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
3. Will business services still be available
after project?
4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 8 Months
300-
400K
2
1000-
1500
0
300-
400K
110
1000-
1500
19
X
400K up
0
1500 up
0
400K up
456
1500 up
608
TOTAL
2
0
585
629
X
REMARKS (Respond by Number)
*% Minority is based on Census data - Please provide
Census data for the area
3. Businesses will still be available.
6. MLS; COStar; Real Estate websites
8. In accordance with the Uniform Relocation Act, to
be considered as necessary and/or required by Law.
11. Wake County has public housing.
12. Based on review of the Triangle MLS, there is
adequate housing available and that trend is expected
to continue.
14. CoStar; MLS; Real Estate websites
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7/7/2023�
; 07/12/2023
C. Richard Birkholz Date
Estimator
Relocation Coordinator Date
FRM15-E
Revised 4/13/22

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Paae 1
Direct and Indirect Screening Tool
Project STIP Project No. HL-00081
Widen Old Stage Road (S.R. 1006) from Rock Service Station Road (S.R. 2736) to Rolling
Meadows Drive
Document Type: ® NEPA ❑ SEPA
Prepared by: Robby Bessette, Three Oaks Engineering
NCDOT Project Manager: Zahid Baloch, PE CS Reviewer: Herman Huang
NCDOT STIP Project No. HL-00081 (WBS #49367.1.9) proposes to widen Old Stage Road
(S.R. 1006) from Rock Service Station Road (S.R. 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake
County, North Carolina. The project is located approximately 8 miles northeast of Fuquay
Varina and 10 miles south of downtown Raleigh. The purpose of the project is to reduce the
congestion in the study area and improve mobility at the intersection of Old Stage Road and
Rock Service Station Road. The project will result in a continuous green, T-intersection for Old
Stage Road. Right-of-way (ROW) and Construction are currently scheduled for Fiscal Years (FY)
2023 and 2024, respectively.
Old Stage Road has an NCDOT functional classification of Minor Arterial north of Rock
Service Station Road and a functional classification of Major Collector south of Rock Service
Station Road with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph) throughout the project area.
The existing roadway is a two-lane, undivided corridor. The proposed typical section features
three lanes (two northbound lanes and one southbound lane) with shoulder sections and a
raised median. The design speed will be 50 mph while the posted speed will be 45 mph. Phased
construction will be used to construct two lanes to maintain traffic, shift traffic to the new
travel pattern, complete construction, and then shift traffic into its final travel pattern.
The land surrounding the project is primarily low -density residential, agricultural, or
undeveloped with a small number of community resources in close proximity. Active agriculture
can be seen on parcels throughout the study area and a Wake County VAD is present at the
southern end of the project. Triangle Baptist Church is located within the project area.
The project's Demographic Study Area (DSA) consists of three Census block groups: CT
528.04, BG 1; CT 529.04 BG 2; and CT 531.10. BG1. While Census data does not indicate a
notable presence of low-income or minority populations, low-income and minority populations
were observed in the project study area from aerial photography and Street View. At 9916 Old
Stage Road, a mobile home property may lose a portion of its parking area due to widening
along the roadside. Census data does however indicate Language Assistance (LA) populations
meeting the US Department of Justice threshold within the DSA. The LA threshold is met in CT
529.04, BG 1 for Asian/Pacific language and in CT 531.1, BG 1 for Spanish language. Iglesia
Adventista del Septimo Dis Hispana church is located at 9713 Old Stage Road, and may function
as a language resource for outreach.
• Because notable Asian/Pacific and Spanish language -speaking populations are located
within the project study area, the NCDOT Project Manager should consult with NCDOT

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Paae 2
Public Involvement to determine appropriate measures assuring meaningful public
involvement to satisfy the requirements of Executive Order 12898.
Direct Impacts
1. Are notable right-of-way impacts possible?
Notable right-of-way impacts include residential, institutional and/or business relocations, loss
of one or more required parking spaces, major changes to property access, and similar direct
property effects.
❑ No right-of-way needed for this project.
❑ No
❑X Yes
Right of way frontage impacts are anticipated throughout the project. One Underground
Storage Tank (UST) is known to be present on the Exxon property at the intersection of Old
Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road on the southern end of the project. Most of the
work proposed at this intersection occurs within existing ROW limits. A small portion of the
Exxon property will be impacted by fill material along the roadside with a temporary
construction easement. No impact to the UST by this project is anticipated at this time. If the
UST cannot be avoided, the impact could result in a potential relocation. Further assessment
by a Short Form Community Impact Assessment would be warranted.
2. Are negative impacts to pedestrian or bicycle facilities possible?
Pedestrian and bicycle impacts include facilities that currently do not or that after completion
will not meet ADA or comply with Complete Streets policies, blocked or notably delayed
crossings (temporary or permanent), notably longer or indirect routes, insufficient space to
share or to separate lanes, a notable increase in conflict points, and similar barrier effects or
inadequate accommodations.
❑X Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
❑ Yes
3. Are negative impacts to transit possible?
Transit is considered to be present if a fixed route bus travels along the project corridor or if it
travels along an intersecting street and crosses the project corridor. There does not need to be

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Page 3
a stop within the project footprint. Impacts include notable delays, stop relocations, and/or
increased difficulty for bus riders to reach a stop.
0 Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
❑ Yes
4. Are negative impacts to local traffic on intersecting routes possible?
Local traffic impacts include closed intersections, notably longer routes to reach destinations on
the other side of the project corridor, notable delays or difficulties for emergency vehicles,
school buses, garbage trucks, farm equipment, etc. to cross the corridor, inadequate
accommodation of vehicles making left or U turns to access local streets, and similar concerns.
Adding signals, roundabouts, superstreets or medians do not, in and of themselves, notably
impact local traffic, but the spacing of median openings and distances needed to make U turns
may have negative impacts.
❑ Not present/Not applicable
0 No
❑ Yes
5. Are negative impacts to parks and recreational facilities possible?
Right-of-way impacts may be permanent or temporary, including temporary construction
easements. Access impacts must substantially impair access to and use of a facility, such as
during construction should lane narrowing or detours notably hinder vehicles with trailers from
reaching a boat ramp. Parks and recreation facilities must be publicly owned or leased and
open to the public.
0 Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
❑ Yes
6. Are negative impacts to farmland soils, agricultural operations or voluntary agriculture
districts possible?
Right-of-way impacts may be permanent or temporary, including temporary construction
easements, which convert farmland to non farm use. Access impacts must substantially impair
access to and use of an operation, such as during construction should lane narrowing, detour
routes or detour bridge weight limits prevent farm vehicles from accessing fields or require low

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Paae 4
speed vehicles to use high speed roads. VADs and EVADs are not impact categories but may
affect right-of-way acquisition and are noted to avoid project delay.
❑ Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
0 Yes
WSS Soil Classifications show that prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance are
present within the project area, and it is anticipated that some such soils will be impacted by
this project.
• Given that notable project impacts to eligible soils maybe anticipated, the NCDOT
Project Manager should consider measures to minimize these impacts.
Active agriculture was observed via Google Maps and Google Street View at the following
addresses:
• 9917 Old Stage Road (east of Old Stage Road, south of Rolling Meadows Drive and
north of Banks Road), is a 38-acre parcel used for agriculture. Widening occurs on the
east side of Old Stage Road and will impact this parcel with an additional northbound
travel lane. ROW acquisition and a temporary construction easement is needed.
• 2516 Banks Road (west of Old Stage Road, just north of Banks Road) is a 7-acre parcel
used for agriculture. A right turn lane from southbound Old Stage Road onto Banks
Road is proposed. Construction easement is needed along the roadside of this parcel.
• 10133 Old Stage Road (east of Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road at the
intersection of the two roads) is a 32-acre parcel used for agriculture. New ROW is
needed along the roadside to improve the curve alignment.
• 5121 Rock Service Station Road (east of Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road
at the intersection of the two roads) is an 8-acre parcel used for horticulture. New
ROW is needed for the northbound Rock Service Station Road's slip lane to Old Stage
Road.
Wake County Voluntary Agricultural District 0698868036, totaling 32 acres, is located at
10133 Old Stage Road. This parcel is at the southern end of the project on the east side of Old
Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road at the intersection of the two roadways. Right of
way frontage impacts on this property are anticipated.
• If right-of-way will need to be acquired from the VAD property through eminent
domain, the Wake County Voluntary Agricultural District Ordinance requires that the
Wake County Agricultural Advisory Board hold a public hearing on the proposed
condemnation before condemnation may be initiated. Any VAD land converted to
non-agricultural use as part of a temporary construction easement must be returned
to farmable condition by the project's completion.

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Paae 5
7. Is the project potentially inconsistent with local area land development plans, health or
active transport goals, or economic development needs? Is it possible for the project to
negatively impact businesses and economic resources through loss of parking, reduced
visibility, notable changes in access or travel patterns, disruption of district or corridor stability
and cohesion through relocations or barrier effects, or similar impacts?
❑ Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
❑X Yes
CAMPO's 2045 MTP, the Wake County Area Land Use Plan (2003), and Wake County
Transportation all recommend widening Old Stage Road. However, most of these plans
recommend widening Old Stage Road to four lanes (as opposed to three) from Ten Ten Road
to NC 42 and the inclusion of a turn lane on Rock Service Station Road. Additionally, the plans
recommend the inclusion of on -road bicycle facilities along Old Stage Road and/or a 10-foot
multi -use path. The Southwest Area Study identifies Old Stage Road as a proposed Long -Term
Bicycle Corridor and recommends sidewalks along Old Stage Road north of Rock Service
Station Road and a shared use path south of Old Stage Road. The Wake County Greenway
System Plan (2017) recommends a sidepath along Old Stage Road as part of a future
greenway system.
However, the Wake County Planning Department was sent a Start of Study letter and project
data sheet in January 2022 and responded that they have no issues with the project.
Additionally, it is not anticipated that the project will negatively impact businesses and
economic resources through loss of parking, reduced visibility, notable changes in access or
travel patterns, disruption of district or corridor stability and cohesion through relocations or
barrier effects.
8. Is it possible that the project may negatively impact community resources, or to alter the
overall functioning of a district, community or neighborhood, or disrupt connections between
residential and commercial, institutional, recreational and employment areas? Is it possible for
the project to negatively affect emergency services access or pedestrian safety, including
perceived crime concerns? Are there any known or anticipated concerns or controversies
relative to the project?
❑ Not present/Not applicable
❑ No
0 Yes
Within the study area, Triangle Baptist Church is located on the east side of Old Stage Road at
9713 Old Stage Road. Services are held at 10:30am on Sunday mornings. The church building
also houses the Iglesia Adventista del Septimo Dia Hispana - Fuquay Varina. Right-of-way

-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Paae 6
frontage impacts are anticipated on the church property. Additionally, access coordination
for the church may be necessary for some portion of time during construction.
9. Is it possible for the project to add to recurring effects on any populations, neighborhoods or
communities? Recurring effects include past, current and anticipated near term actions that
may have minor impacts individually but when taken as a whole may have notable effects.
❑ Not present/Not applicable
❑X No
❑ Yes
10. Is it possible for the project to have a disproportionately high and adverse impact, including
delay or denial of benefit, on low income, young, old, disabled or minority persons?
❑ Not present/Not applicable
❑X No
❑ Yes
Indirect Impacts
11. Is it likely that the project may result in travel time savings of more than one minute?
❑X No
❑ Yes
12. Will the project permanently add new connections to the existing road network (i.e. new
intersections, intersection -to -interchange conversions' or new service roadsz)?
❑X No
❑ Yes
13. Will the project provide new or expanded access to properties?
❑X No
❑ Yes
' This refers to a replacement as an individual project. Converting intersections to interchanges as part of corridor
upgrade projects should be considered within the context of the larger project.
Z This refers to construction of new roads along an existing highway frontage to provide access where none has
existed previously. Generally this does not apply to constructing service roads to replace driveways due to a
change in access or other access management considerations.

HL-00081 o Wake County o DIST o May 2022 o Page 7
14. Will the project encourage the development of activity centers or similar areas of
concentrated, moderate to high intensity land development or redevelopment?
❑X No
❑ Yes

STIP HL-0008i Wake County
SHORT FORM COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
PLANNER, FIRM:
Joanna Salvucci, Three
Oaks Engineering
DIVISION: 5Existing
No. of Lanes: 2 Existing Median: No
NCDOT/LOCAL
PROJECT MANAGER:
Zahld Baloch
wss: 49367.1.9
Proposed No. of Lanes: 4 Addition of Median(s): Yes
PROJECT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
® DIVISION
Existing control of access:
Proposed control of access:
® NEPA
❑ CENTRAL
❑ No Control
❑ No Control
❑ SEPA
❑ LOCALLY-ADMIN.
❑ Partial Control
❑Partial Control
PROGRAM PROJECT
(LAPP)
❑ Limited Control
❑ Limited Control
CS PROJECT
Herman HuangEl
Full Control
El Full Control
REVIEWER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake
County.
Community Context
Legend s,
on Ho,
Garner 0'
CAMPO Alternative ^ Ro cif, N
Project Study Area 1
Sea5lonc SI SIa9'des10
Future 1-540 Alignment
Fuquay-Yaririna
a
or
u`
nR1
else
ut
4
n Tp
Project Location
a
2
q N %Ln 'e
an 4` a� Harvey �°Vnson Rd f !^
U
4
6°padhaven Or o eRd
ea
v, h�
pt �
T4rhef� �n pd9 -
Y a� �
a ,T
0
0 0.5 1 w
Miles 'z
ar'
VICINITY MAP County. WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA WIDEN OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) Figure
OEPARTMENT
FROM ROCK SERVICE STATION RD (SR 2736) Div" s STIPNML-0ooai
TRANSPORTATION TO ROLLING MEADOWS DR DI WRS' 49367.1.9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY pate' oCTOBER 2a22
NORTH CAROLINA

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 2
The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to widen Old Stage Road from Rock Service Station Road to
Rolling Meadows Drive in Wake County. The purpose of this project is to reduce congestion in the study area and
improve mobility at the intersection of Old Stage Road (S.R. 1006) and Rock Service Station Road (S.R. 2736).
The project would require additional right of way, and temporary construction easements will be utilized. The
existing two-lane road would be widened to four 12-foot lanes, two northbound and two southbound, with a 17.5'
raised median, 2-foot curb and gutter section. A 10-foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the roadway and a 5
foot sidewalk would be constructed on the western side of the roadway. In addition, the existing Old Stage Road
and Rock Service Station Road intersection would be shifted slightly south, across from Back Field Road. The
intersection would include a bulbout turn around on Rock Service Station Road. The Banks Road intersection with
Old Stage Road would be converted to a reduced -conflict intersection.
A previous alternative proposed to widen Old Stage Road to three lanes (two northbound and one southbound),
with a 5-foot bike lane on one side. This alternative was evaluated in the Direct and Indirect Screening Tool dated
from May 2022. Additional funds may be available for the 4-lane typical section that was not available in the prior
study. The 2050 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's Metropolitan Transportation Plan included a
proposed 4-lane typical section on Old Stage Road within the project study area.
The project is located approximately 5 miles southwest of Garner, 8 miles northeast of Fuquay Varina and 10 miles
south of downtown Raleigh. The land surrounding the project is primarily low -density residential, agricultural, or
undeveloped with a small number of community resources in close proximity. Active agriculture can be seen on
parcels throughout the study area and a Wake County Voluntary Agricultural District (VAD) is present at the
southern end of the project.
Land within the project DCIA is classified as Community Reserve on the PlanWake Development Framework from
Wake County. Old Stage Road is classified as a minor arterial north of the Rock Service Station Road intersection
and a major collector south of the intersection. Rock Service Station Road is classified as a major collector.
The Complete 540 Project (R-2828 and R-2721 B) is currently under construction just north of the project study area
and will become part of the Triangle Expressway. The project will add an interchange north on Old Stage Road,
which has the potential to increase traffic in the project study area. Current traffic conditions at the following two
locations have failing LOS. This base year analysis does not consider the implications of the 1-540 Outer Loop
project being operational and increasing traffic volumes in the area.
Northbound movement on Rock Service Station Road at Old Stage Road in the AM period experiences a 219
second delay.
Eastbound movement on Banks Road at Old Stage Road in the AM and PM period experiences an 85 to 98
second delay, respectively.
Traffic forecasts reflect increases due to both the 2% annual average population growth as well as added traffic
from the future 1-540 interchange. Increase in traffic attributable to the 1-540 interchange is approximately 200
vehicles/peak hour.
There are no existing bicycle, pedestrian, and/or greenway facilities within the DCIA. A shared use path is planned
along Old Stage Road within the project study area that will connect to a larger multimodal system. CAMPO
Southeast Area Study identifies Old Stage Road in the project study area as a proposed long-term bicycle corridor.
CAMPO's 2045 MTP, the Wake County Area Land Use Plan (2003), and Wake County Transportation all
recommend the inclusion of on -road bicycle facilities along Old Stage Road and/or a 10-foot multi -use path.
Notable Characteristics
• One farm within the DCIA participates in the Wake County VAD. Wake County VAD 0698868036, totaling 32
acres, is located at 10133 Old Stage Road.
• Active agriculture was observed via Google Maps and Google Street View at six different addresses within the
DCIA.
• Several paved and unpaved residential driveways and nine intersections located within the DCIA, resulting in a
low to moderate density of access points along the project corridor.
• Four businesses, including the Community Mart convenience store, are present within the project DCIA. In an
email on June 28, 2022, the Wake County Planning Department, Ms. Celena Everette, noted a high growth
potential along Old Stage Road south of Ten Ten Road to the southern Wake County boundary. There are 17

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 3
preliminary subdivision plans submitted for review in the four census tract areas. There are approximately 638
lots proposed in these 17 subdivisions.
• The Garner Fire Department responded to the Start of Study notification sent on February 14, 2022 expressing
concerns for accessing the opposite side of the road with the proposed median (See Appendix C).
• Banks Road Elementary is located 2.2 miles west of the project at 10225 Chambers Road, and Vance
Elementary School is located 0.8 mile north of the project at 8808 Old Stage Road.
• Two churches are located within the DCIA.
• Comments from the public included concerns regarding left turns from Banks Road onto Old Stage Road and
the recommendation of a turn lane and/or stoplight. Other comments include the need for widening on Old
Stage Road to US 401, and the lack of need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity.
• Census data does not indicate a notable presence of populations meeting the criteria for Environmental Justice
within the Demographic Study Area (DSA), nor were minority, low-income, or non-EJ Title VI communities
observed within the Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) during the field visit or were noted by local planners.
• Census data does not indicate Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations meeting the US Department of
Justice LEP Safe Harbor threshold, but does indicate a Spanish language -speaking population exceeding 50
persons within the Demographic Study Area that may require language assistance. Census data also indicates
another Asian/Pacific language -speaking population that exceeds 50 persons within the Demographic Study
Area that may require language assistance.
Project Impacts
• The VAD located at 10133 Old Stage Road will be impacted by right-of-way acquisition and land within the VAD
may be temporarily converted to non-agricultural use. A turn -around, bulb -out for southbound vehicles turning
to go north would encroach on the northern portion of the VAD property. The proposed multi -use path widens
the footprint of the project and results in impacts to the VAD property frontage as well.
• A median will separate the northbound and southbound lanes which impact agricultural property access from
either direction. Some driveways to agricultural properties will be impacted. Most agricultural impacts will occur
at the road frontage and be minimal in nature. Minor, temporary access impacts to these properties during
construction are anticipated as well.
• Minor, temporary access impacts are anticipated to driveways during construction.
• Access will change to Community Mart and Exxon due to the proposed design shifting the Old Stage Road and
Rock Service Station Road intersection south, across from Back Field Road.
• The proposed project would include mountable medians that EMS vehicles could drive over to access the
opposite side of the road if necessary. Minor, temporary response time delays are possible during construction.
• Temporary school bus delays are possible during construction.
• Minor, temporary access impacts to two churches within the DCIA are possible during construction.
• As a result of public input and subsequent coordination with the project team, the Banks Road intersection will
be converted to a reduced -conflict intersection (RCI) to improve safety and mobility through the area.
• No notably adverse community impacts are anticipated with this project and no Environmental Justice
populations appear to be affected; thus, impacts to minority and low-income populations do not appear to be
disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits and burdens resulting from the project are anticipated to be
equitably distributed throughout the community, and no denial of benefit is expected. No disparate impacts are
anticipated under Title VI and related statutes.
Recommendations
• Right of way frontage impacts on this property are anticipated. If right-of-way will need to be acquired from the
VAD property through eminent domain, the Wake County VAD Ordinance requires that the Wake County
Agricultural Advisory Board hold a public hearing on the proposed condemnation before condemnation may be
initiated, or other specific provision of that county's enabling ordinance. Any VAD lands converted to non-
agricultural use as part of a temporary construction easement must be returned to farmable condition by the
project's completion. Early coordination with the VAD property owner is recommended.
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager ensure proper access to and from each of the agricultural
properties listed above.
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager coordinate with Work Zone Traffic Control to ensure
access to all driveways during construction.

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 4
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager maintain ongoing coordination with the Wake County and
City of Raleigh Planning Departments to remain up to date on any subdivision or development plans as the
project progresses.
• It is also recommended that the Community Mart convenience store is adequately informed of changes in
access to their property.
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager coordinate with Wake County and City of Raleigh EMS.
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager coordinate with Vance Elementary School and Banks
Road Elementary School regarding construction schedules and bus routing.
• It is recommended that the NCDOT Project manager ensure adequate access to community resources during
construction.
• Because notable Spanish and Asian/Pacific language -speaking populations requiring language assistance are
located within the DCIA, the NCDOT Project Manager should consult with NCDOT Public Involvement to
determine appropriate measures assuring meaningful public involvement to satisfy the requirements of
Executive Order 12898.
Indirect and Cumulative Effects Statement
• The project will not alter travel patterns, reduce travel time, affect access to properties in the area, or open
areas for development or redevelopment. Due to its minimal transportation impact -causing activities, this
project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect and
cumulative effects study will not be necessary.

2 N
Q O¢
z z�=
�z0=
V q�LLO
�aZ=
a W W 0
N
Ol
OM
Qom' A
IL LL N
Q 1 O � Q'
f O N O
K lic z as
V z Q A
O
0 �a
Y WrgO OU o
~ Q W ? W
OOry O
U z .c
W O
OO
\}Z
C ROWELLS
County.
WAKE
on: STI-
5 NL-OM
Ua e:
JANUARY 2023
Figure
2

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 6
COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS, IMPACTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Community Resource
Presence
RECREATIONAL RESOURCE(S) OR ACTIVITY
❑ YES, SEPA Parks & Recreation
❑ YES, NEPA potential 4(f);
Presence
adjacent to/accessed from the
Are there any recreational resources, areas, or observed activities in the Direct Community Impact
project corridor
Area? If Federally -funded, are these potential 4(f) resources?
❑ YES, NEPA potential 4(f);
present in DCIA but not adjacent to
or accessed from the project corridor
® NO
Impacts
❑ YES, SEPA
Impact
❑ YES,
potential NEPA
impact
® NO
❑ YES
Recommendation
SECTION 6(F) LAND & WATER CONSERVATION FUND RESOURCES
®NO
❑ YES
® NO
Presence
Are there any areas protected under Section 6(f) in the Direct Community Impact Area?
I mpacts
❑ YES
Is the project likely to impact identified Section 6(0 Land & Water Conservation Fund Resources?
® NO
Recommendation
❑ YES
® NO
FARMLAND SOILS
❑ YES, SEPA
❑ YES, NEPA (FPPA)
Presence
❑ NO, not present
Are there any farmland soils within the project footprint?
® Not applicable -urbanized
area
Impacts
❑ YES, SEPA conversion
,� ,,,v piyjv�, „Kely to have a notable impact on identified Farmland Protection Policy Act soils?
❑ YES, NEPA, does not exceed
FPPA threshold
® YES, NEPA, exceeds FPPA
threshold
❑ NO
Recommendation
® YES
❑ NO
VOLUNTARY & ENHANCED VOLUNTARY AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS (VAD/EVAD] ® YES
❑ NO
Presence
,7ere a Voluntary Agricultural District or Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District in the project footprint?
One farm within the DCIA participates in the Wake County Voluntary Agricultural District. Wake
County Voluntary Agricultural District 0698868036, totaling 32 acres, is located at
10133 Old
mod.

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 7
Stage Road. This parcel is at the southern end of the project on the east side of Old Stage Road
and Rock Service Station Road at the intersection of the two roadways.
Impacts ®YES
,- ... - project likely to impact designated Voluntary Agricultural Districts or Enhanced Voluntary ❑ NO
Agricultural Districts?
The VAD located at 10133 Old Stage Road (PIN: 0698868036) would be
impacted by right-of-way acquisition and permanent easement. 0.314 acres of
right-of-way and 0.103 of permanent easement would need to be acquired.
However, this 0.415 acre portion of land is not currently being farmed, and so
no conversion would take place.
A turn -around, bulb -out for southbound vehicles turning to go north would
encroach on the northern portion of the VAD property. The proposed multi -use
path widens the footprint of the project and results in impacts to the VAD
property frontage as well.
The VAD parcel owner has expressed the following concerns about the project:
• A lack of need for the sidewalk and multiuse path
• Concerns regarding utilities and well location
• The median will make it difficult to travel north from the home (will need
to travel south, and used turning bulb)
• Acquisition of property frontage decreases value of the property
• Access impacts to the farmland
• Concerns about property acquisition
Recommendation
Right of way frontage impacts on this property are anticipated. If right-of-way will need to be
acquired from the VAD property through eminent domain, the Wake County VAD Ordinance
requires that the Wake County Agricultural Advisory Board hold a public hearing on the
proposed condemnation before condemnation may be initiated, or other specific provision of
that county's enabling ordinance. Any VAD lands converted to non-agricultural use as part of a
temporary construction easement must be returned to farmable condition by the project's
completion. Early coordination with the VAD property owner is recommended.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES AND ACTIVITY
Presence
Are there any active agricultural operations located in the Direct Community Impact Area? Is there any documented activity
related to goods movement in the Direct Community Impact Area (e.g. farm or logging trucks, tractors, or other agricultural
equipment)?
Active agriculture was observed via Google Maps and Google Street View at the following
addresses:
• 9917 Old Stage Road (east of Old Stage Road, south of Rolling Meadows Drive and
north of Banks Road), is a 38-acre parcel used for agriculture.
• 9605 Old Stage Road (across from Rolling Meadows Drive) is a 28-acre parcel including a
residential home and also used for agriculture.
• 2516 Banks Road (west of Old Stage Road, just north of Banks Road) is a 7-acre parcel
used for agriculture.
• 10133 Old Stage Road (east of the Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road
intersection, off of Back Field Road) is a 32-acre parcel used for agriculture.
• 5121 Rock Service Station Road (east of the existing Old Stage Road and Rock Service
Station Road intersection) is an 8-acre parcel used for horticulture.
• 5204 Rock Service Station Road (800 feet south of Rock Service Station Road and Old
Stage Road intersection) includes a 9-acre parcel on the western side of Old Stage Road
and a 15-acre parcel on the eastern side of the roadway. The property includes a farm and
store, Balls Berries and Produce.
® YES
❑ NO
® YES
❑ NO

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 8
Impacts ® YES
,t likely to impact identified agricultural operations? ❑ NO
• 9917 Old Stage Road - Widening occurs on the east side of Old Stage
Road and will impact this parcel with an additional northbound travel lane as
well as a turnaround bulbout. ROW acquisition and a temporary
construction easement is needed. The bulbout would result in the loss of
active farmland on the western portion of the parcel.
• 2516 Banks Road - A right turn lane from southbound Old Stage Road onto
Banks Road is proposed. Construction easement is needed along the
roadside of this parcel.
• 10133 Old Stage Road - New ROW is needed along the roadside to
improve the curve alignment and add bus turnaround. See VAD section
above.
• 5121 Rock Service Station Road — New ROW is needed for the northbound
Rock Service Station Road's slip lane to Old Stage Road.
A median will separate the northbound and southbound lanes which impact the
access from either direction. This could result in difficulty getting to and from
farms with equipment or other activities. Some driveways will be impacted. Most
impacts will occur at the road frontage and be minimal in nature.
Minor, temporary access impacts to these properties during construction are
anticipated as well.
Recommendation ® YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager ensure proper access to and from each of ❑ NO
the agricultural properties listed above.
BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND/OR GREENWAY FACILITIES AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ® YES
❑ NO
Presence
— existing bicycle, pedestrian, greenway or other active transport facilities located in the Direct Community Impact
Area? Are there future plans for bicycle, pedestrian, greenway or active transport facilities to be located in the Direct
Community lmnart Araa?
There are no existing bicycle, pedestrian, and/or greenway facilities within the DCIA. A shared
use path is planned along Old Stage Road within the project study area that will connect to a
larger multimodal system. This phase of the shared use path would be located entirely on Old
Stage Road and start around Gentle Valley Lane and terminate near Panther Lake Road. In
addition, there is a planned greenway along Little Creek parallel to the project study area, but
outside of the DCIA.
CAMPO Southeast Area Study identifies Old Stage Road in the project study area as a
proposed long-term bicycle corridor. In addition, for pedestrian improvements, the Plan identified
the project study area as having a proposed shared use path/sidewalk system.
The Wake County Greenway System Plan (2017) identifies a greenway or shared use path
facility in the vicinity of the project area. The path would be part of the "Complete the System"
Phase and would be approximately 5.5 miles from Swift Creek Greenway to the Middle Creek
Greenway.
CAMPO's 2045 MTP, the Wake County Area Land Use Plan (2003), and Wake County
Transportation all recommend the inclusion of on -road bicycle facilities along Old Stage Road
and/or a 10-foot multi -use path. The Southwest Area Study identifies Old Stage Road as a
proposed Long -Term Bicycle Corridor and recommends sidewalks along Old Stage Road north
of Rock Service Station Road and a shared use path south of Old Stage Road. The Wake
County Greenway System Plan recommends a sidepath along Old Stage Road as part of a
future greenway system.

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 9
Impacts ❑ YES
t likely to result in impacts to bicycle, pedestrian, and/or greenway facilities? ® NO
The project is expected to provide positive impacts to bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. A 10-foot multiuse path and a 5-foot sidewalk are proposed as part of
the project, increasing multimodal access and connectivity.
Recommendation
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
Presence
Were bicyclists, pedestrians or worn paths observed in the Direct Community Impact Area?
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
Impacts ❑ YES
Is the project likely to result in impacts to bicycle or pedestrian activity? ® NO
Recommendation ❑ YES
❑ NO
TRANSIT ROUTES, FACILITIES, AND/OR ACTIVITY ❑ YES
Presence ® NO
Are transit routes present in the Direct Community Impact Area? Were buses, transit stops or route signs observed on the
site visit? Were any riders observed using or known to use these facilities? Were any of these riders special users?
Impacts ❑ YES
Is the project likely to result in impacts to transit routes, facilities, and/or activity? ® NO
Recommendation ❑ YES
® NO
COMMUNITY SAFETY FOR BICYCLISTS, PEDESTRIANS, AND TRANSIT USERS ❑ YES
Presence ® NO
Are there any existing or perceived security or safety issues in the Direct Community Impact Area, including unsafe bicycle
or pedestrian facilities, inadequate lighting, and/or isolated or poorly connected areas?
Impacts ❑ YES
Is the project likely to change any existing or perceived security or safety issues? ® NO
Recommendation ❑ YES
® NO

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 10
LOCAL AREA PLANS, GOALS, AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY I ® YES
Presence ❑ NO
Are rnere any local area plans, goals, or zoning initiatives specifically affecting the Direct Community Impact Area (e.g.
comprehensive plan; corridor or thoroughfare plan; small area plan; long-range growth plan; health impact assessment;
etc.)? Has recent development activity occurred in the Direct Community Impact Area and/or are there known plans for
public or private development activity in the Direct Community Impact Area?
CAMPO'S 2045 MTP, the Wake County Area Land Use Plan (2003), and Wake County
Transportation all recommend widening Old Stage Road to four lanes from Ten Ten Road
to NC 42, as well as including a turn lane on Rock Service Station Road.
Project R-2828 recently constructed NC 540 on new location from US 401 to 1-40. The project
constructed an interchange over Old Stage Road approximately 600 feet north of Rolling
Meadows Drive.
The Wake Parks and Future Population Growth — Residential Growth Hotspots map shows two
spots within the DCIA, just south of the Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road
intersection as "residential growth hotspots."
The DCIA falls within the development framework of Community Reserve according to iMAPs
Planning and Development. A small portion in the northeast corner of the DCIA falls under the
development framework of Walkable Center. The Wake County Zoning Map shows the marjoity
of the DCIA zoned as residential with a small portion falling under general business.
In an email on June 28, 2022, the Wake County Planning Department, Ms. Celena Everette,
noted a high growth potential along Old Stage Road south of Ten Ten Road to the southern
Wake County boundary. There are 17 preliminary subdivision plans submitted for review in the
four census tract areas. There are approximately 638 lots proposed in these 17 subdivisions.
Although it is unclear when these subdivisions will be constructed and homes purchased, the
development potential in the area is high. This development will bring additional traffic demands
to the region, in particular along Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road. Congestion is
expected to worsen over the next decade.
Impacts
CONSISTENT
N, eject consistent or not consistent with existing plans, regulations, and policies at the local, regional, or state level?
❑ PARTLY
CONSISTENT,
PARTLY
INCONSISTENT
❑ NOT
CONSISTENT
Recommendation
® YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager maintain ongoing coordination with the
❑ NO
Wake County and City of Raleigh Planning Departments to remain up to date on any subdivision
or development plans as the project progresses.
DRIVEWAYS AND CROSS STREETS
❑ YES
❑ No
Presence
'?V driveways or intersections located along the project corridor?
Several paved and unpaved residential driveways and 9 intersections are located within the
DCIA, resulting in a low to moderate density of access points along the project corridor.
Impacts ❑ YES
-t likely to result in access or accessibility impacts to driveways and cross streets? ❑ NO
Minor, temporary access impacts are anticipated to driveways during
construction.

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 11
Recommendation ❑ YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT project manager coordinate with Work Zone Traffic Control ❑ NO
to ensure access to all driveways during construction.
BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES AND TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY ® YES
❑ NO
Presence
Are any specific business and/or economic resources present in the Direct Community Impact Area (e.g. business parks or
districts, distribution centers, manufacturing facilities, etc.)? Is there any documented activity related to goods movement in
the Direct Community Impact Area (e.g. tractor- trailers, or industrial traffic)?
Four businesses are present within the project DCIA. Comfort Hounds Heating & Cooling is an
air conditioner contractor located at 1008 Field Grass Place, and is open 24 hours. The
Community Mart convenience store as well as Exxon is located at 10128 Old Stage Road at the
northwest quadrant of the Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection.
Thomas Howell Drywall is a dry wall contractor located at 9801 Old Stage Road near the
northern end of the project corridor, and is temporarily closed.
Impacts ® YES
Is the project likely to result in impacts to business and economic resources? ❑ NO
Access change to Community Mart and Exxon is anticipated due to the project
design proposing to shift the Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road
intersection south, across from Banks Field Road. Access impacts during
construction are anticipated as well.
It is not anticipated that the project will negatively impact businesses and
economic resources through loss of parking, reduced visibility, notable changes
in access or travel patterns, disruption of district or corridor stability and
cohesion through relocations or barrier effects.
Recommendation
10 YES
It is recommended that the Community Mart convenience store and Exxon is adequately
❑ NO
informed of changes in access to their property.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES (EMS) OPERATIONS
® YES
❑ NO
Presence
❑ NO
Did the EMS local official note any emergency services operations within the Direct Community Impact Area that may be
RESPONSE
affected by the project such as stations or corridors that are primary response routes?
The Garner Volunteer Fire Department Station 2 is located 1.7 miles east of the project at 9115
Sauls Road. The Garner Fire Department responded to the Start of Study notification sent on
February 14, 2022 expressing concerns for accessing the opposite side of the road with the
proposed median (See Appendix C).
Impacts ® YES
As checked on Local EMS Input Form ❑ NO
The proposed project would include mountable medians that EMS vehicles ❑ NO
could drive over to access the opposite side of the road. Additionally, a bulbout RESPONSE
U-turn is proposed for the Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road
intersection. These project features are expected to address the concerns
expressed by the Garner Fire Department.
Minor, temporary response time delays are possible during construction.
Recommendation
® YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT project manager coordinate with Wake County and City of
❑ NO
Raleigh EMS.

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 12
SCHOOL BUS ROUTES
® YES
❑ NO
Presence
❑ NO
L)m me local school transportation official note any school bus routes within the Direct Community Impact Area that may be
RESPONSE
affected by the project? Did the official note any carpool routes or walking routes?
Banks Road Elementary is located 2.2 miles west of the project at 10225 Chambers Road, and
Vance Elementary School is located 0.84 miles north of the project at 8808 Old Stage Road.
School officials did not respond to requests for input.
® YES
Impacts
n� �,ecked on Local Schools Input Form. Did the official note impacts to carpool routes, walking routes ❑ NO
to school, or to school zone traffic patterns? ❑ NO
Temporary school bus delays are possible during construction. RESPONSE
Recommendation
® YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager coordinate with Vance Elementary School
❑ NO
and Banks Road Elementary School regarding construction schedules and bus routing.
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
® YES
❑ No
Presence
,,ire mere any notable community resources located in the Direct Community Impact Area, including places of worship;
private and/or public schools; adult education and/or training facilities; daycares; cemeteries; private or public social service
agencies, goy mment facilities; other important destinations rr resources for local residents'
Triangle Baptist Church is located at 9713 Old Stage Road near the northern portion of the
DCIA. Iglesia Adventista Del Septimo Dia Hispana - Fuquay Varina / Fuquay Varina Spanish
Seventh-Day Adventist Church is located within Triangle Baptist Church. Triangle Baptist
Church holds a 10:30am Sunday Service.
Impacts ® YES During
Is the project likely to impact identified community resources, either directly or by affecting user access? ❑
NO construction
Minor, temporary access impacts are possible during construction.
Recommendation ❑ YES
It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Manager ensure adequate access to community ® No
resources during construction.
COMMUNITY COHESION ❑ YES
Presence ® NO
Were any specific signs or indicators of community cohesion observed /found within the Direct Community Impact Area?
Impacts ❑ YES
Is the project likely to alter the overall functioning of an identifiable district (e.g. interactions between, or ® NO
isolation of, persons and groups; or change in the physical makeup of the community)? Is the project
likely to disrupt connections between neighborhoods and commercial, recreational, institutional and
employment facilities and/or areas?
Recommendation ❑ YES
® NO

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 13
AREA/COMMUNITY CONCERNS
Presence
Are there any known community concerns or controversy relative to the project? If concerns were voiced during Public
Involvement activities, please attach the relevant comment sheets or meeting comment summary in the Appendix.
A public meeting for this project was held on November 17, 2022 at Holland's United Methodist
Church in Raleigh. There were around 70 attendees and several provided comments to NCDOT
and consultant staff. 35 people submitted comments online during the project comment period
from November 17, 2022 to December 16, 2022.
Comments included concerns regarding left turns from Banks Road onto Old Stage Road and
the recommendation of a turn lane and/or stoplight. Other comments include the need for
widening on Old Stage Road to US 401, and the lack of need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities
in the project vicinity.
Impacts ❑ YES
is the project likely to be incompatible with or not address community concerns? ® NO
As a result of public input and subsequent coordination with the project team,
Banks Road intersection will be converted to a reduced -conflict intersection
(RCI) to improve safety and mobility through the area.
Recommendation
OTHER IMPACTS
Are there any other potential impacts associated with the project?
Recommendation
RECURRING EFFECTS
Impacts
Is the project likely to result in recurring effects on any populations and communities within the Direct
Community Impact Area?
Recommendation
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (EJ) AND TITLE VI POPULATIONS
Presence
Are there any populations living in the Demographic Study Area that meet the criteria for Environmental
Justice and/or Title VI? If so, note which groups are present (check all that apply):
❑ Minority ❑ Low -Income ❑ Title VI (non-EJ)
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
® YES
❑ NO
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
® Not present according to Census
data and observation/local input
❑ Present; Census data indicates
presence but there is no
observation/local input to confirm
❑ Present; Census data does not
indicate presence but communities
were observed
❑ Present according to Census
and communities were observed
Impacts ® No impacts; no EJ or Title VI
Is the project likely to have a disproportionately high and adverse impact, including denial of benefits, on population present
identified Environmental Justice and/or Title VI populations in the Direct Community Impact Area? ❑ No impacts; EJ and/or Title VI
population present
❑ Community Impacts; no EJ or
Title VI population present
❑ Impacts; EJ and/or Title VI
population present; "No" finding

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 14
❑ Impacts; EJ and/or Title VI
population present; "Yes" finding
Recommendation ❑ YES
® NO
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY [LEP] OR LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE [LA]
POPULATIONS
PYPCPn(-P
there any populations living in the Demographic Study Area that meet the criteria for Limited
English Proficiency? Are there any populations within the Demographic Study Area that do not meet the
LEP threshold but do meet the criteria for Language Assistance?
Census data does not indicate Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations
meeting the US Department of Justice LEP Safe Harbor threshold, but does
indicate a Spanish language -speaking population exceeding 50 persons within
the Demographic Study Area that may require language assistance.
Iglesia Adventista Del Septimo Dia Hispana - Fuquay Varina is located within
the DCIA and is a community resource for Spanish-speaking populations.
Census data also indicates another Asian/Pacific language -speaking population
that exceeds 50 persons within the Demographic Study Area that may require
language assistance.
❑ No LEP or LA
® No LEP, but LA population is
present
❑ LEP population present
❑ [and LA population present]
Recommendation ® YES
Because notable Spanish and Asian/Pacific language -speaking populations requiring language ❑ NO
assistance are located within the DCIA, the NCDOT Project Manager should consult with
NCDOT Public Involvement to determine appropriate measures assuring meaningful public
involvement to satisfy the requirements of Executive Order 12898.
L
STIP PROJECTS
Presence
Are there any reasonably foreseeable STIP projects within 3 miles of this project and/or that have the potential to affect or
be affected by this project?
❑ YES
® NO
EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE(S) THAT UTILIZE A TEMPORARY ON -SITE DETOUR ❑ YES
® NO
EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION WORK SCHEDULES
❑ YES
® NO
OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ YES
® NO

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 15
Indirect and Cumulative Effects [Transportation Impact -Causing Activities (TICAs)]
TRAVEL TIMES ❑ YES
Will the project result in travel time savings of more than one minute? ® NO
NEW NETWORK CONNECTIONS
Will the project permanently add to the existing road network (e.g., new location or new service roads)?
PROPERTY ACCESS
IMII the project provide new or expanded access to properties?
CREATION OF ACTIVITY CENTERS
Will the project open areas for concentrated, moderate to high intensity land development or redevelopment?
TICA SUMMARY / INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS STATEMENT
Will the project result in one or more transportation impact -causing activities? Will the project require completion of
the Irrlirect Effects Matrix?
The project will not alter travel patterns, reduce travel time, affect access to properties in
the area, or open areas for development or redevelopment. Due to its minimal
transportation impact -causing activities, this project will neither influence nearby land
uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect and cumulative effects study will
not be necessary.
SOURCES
2030 Comprehensive Plan, City of Raleigh.
https://user-2081353526.cld.bz/2030ComprehensivePIan Update
2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, NC Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
https://www.campo-nc.us/transportation-plan/2045-metropolitan-transportation-plan
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
❑ YES
® NO
® Absence of TICAs
❑ Presence of TICAs
COMPLETION OF MATRIX:
❑ YES
® NO
Adopted 2050 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Interactive GIS, NC Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
https://ral.maps.arcqis.com/apes/webappviewer/index.html?id=96ce0056b372454a87af34c506l 6fOb0
CAMPO 2050 MTP Roadway Projects List, NC Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
https://nmcdn.io/el 86d2l f8c7946al 9faed23c3da2fOda/8bfec28a290449a7bl Oebl fee3a0e264/fi les/transportation-
plan/2050-MTP/Fins I-Plan/Appendix-2---MTP-Roadway-Projects-List-022422. pdf
Consolidated Open Space Plan, March 2003; Wake County.
https://s3.us-west-1 .amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-1 /s3fs-public/documents/2021-
01/2006 OS Plan FullReport.Ddf
Development Framework Map, Wake County.
https://s3.us-west-1 .amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-1 /s3fs-public/documents/2021-
04/WC DevelopmentFramework PubHrg.pdf

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 16
Future Land Use Map, City of Raleigh.
https://cityofraleighOdrupa1.blob.core.us.qovcloudapi.net/drupal-prod/COR22/Future Land Use Map Final.pdf
GoWake Access Transportation, Wake County Government.
https://www.wakegov.com/departments-government/health-human-services/programs-assistance/gowake-access-
transportation
Greenway System Plan, 2017; Wake County.
https://s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-1/s3fs-public/documents/2022-
03/Wake Greenway System Plan September 2018 Final.pdf
NAPS Online Interactive GIS, City of Raleigh. (Layers: Wake County Development Framework, Greenways in Wake
County, Wake Parks and Future Population Growth, Suitable Areas for Building Public Schools in Wake County,
Residential Developments in Wake County, Planning Jurisdictions)
https://maps.raleighnc.gov/iMAPS/
Keith Lankford, Planner III City of Raleigh Planning & Development Department, Local Input Form 10/17/2022
Land Use Plan, Wake County Government.
https://www.wakegov.com/departments-government/pIannin.q-development-inspections/planning/land-use-plan
PLANWake Comprehensive Plan, Wake County Government.
https://s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-l/documents/2022-11/PLANWake-Amended-10-31-22.pdf
RY21-25 Strategic Plan, City of Raleigh.
https://cityofraleighOdrupa1.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/drupal-prod/COR11 /FY21-25StrategicPIan. pdf
Southeast Area Study, NC Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
httos://www.camr)o-nc.us/r)roarams-studies/area-studies/southeast-area-studv
Wake County Greenway System Plan; Wake County Parks, Recreation, and Open Space.
https://aItago.com/wp-content/uploads/Wake-County-Greenwav-System-PIan.pdf
Wake County Transportation Plan, Wake County Government.
https://s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-1/s3fs-public/documents/2020-
1 O/Wake%20County%20Transportation%20PIan. pdf
Wake Transit, GoFoward NC.
httips://www.goforwardnc.org/wake-county/
Zoning Classifications Map, Wake County.
https://s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wakegov.com.if-us-west-1 /s3fs-public/documents/2021-
04/WC DevelopmentFramework PubHrg.pdf
APPENDIX ITEMS
A. Summary of Demographics Used in Tabular Form
B. Site Photographs
C. Local Official Input Forms
D. Other Information

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 17
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICS USED IN TABULAR FORM
Minority
Geography
Total Population
White, Non -Hispanic
Minority Population*
Meets Thresholds
#
%
#
%
50%
10% over
County
CT 529.04, BG 1
3,373
2,124
63.0%
1,249
37.0%
No
No
CT 529.04, BG 2
2,604
1,893
72.7%
711
27.3%
No
No
CT 531.1, BG 1
2,676
1,730
64.6%
946
35.4%
No
No
DSA
8,653
5,747
66.4%
2,906
33.6%
No
N/A
Wake County
1,069,079
641,723
60.0%
427,356
40.0%
North Carolina
10,264,876
6,474,688
63.1%
3,790,188
36.9%
* Minority population includes all races that are Non -White and Hispanic populations that are also White.
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019), Table B03002, "Hispanic or
Latino Origin by Race."

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 18
Poverty
Geography
Population for whom Poverty
Status is Determined
Below Poverty Level
Under 50% of Poverty
Level
Between 100% and
149% of Poverty Level
Meets Thresholds
#
%
#
%
#
%
25%
5% over
County
CT 529.04, BG 1
3,337
303
9.1%
112
3.4%
366
11.0%
No
No
CT 529.04, BG 2
2,604
242
9.3%
224
8.6%
76
2.9%
No
No
CT 531.1, BG 1
2,676
124
4.6%
82
3.1%
61
2.3%
No
No
DSA
8,617
669
7.8%
418
4.9%
503
5.8%
No
N/A
Wake County
1,046,544
95,198
9.1%
43,119
4.1%
66,879
6.4%
North Carolina
9,984,891
1,467,591
14.7%
644,054
6.5%
979,877
9.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019), Table C17002, "Ratio of Income to Poverty Level in the Past
12 Months."

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 19
Limited Enalish Proficien
Geography
Total Adult
Population,
18 years and
older
Primary Language Group of Persons Who Speak English Less than Very Well
Meets Thresholds
Spanish
Other Indo-Euro
Asian/Pacific
Other
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
LEP
LA
CT 529.04, BG 1
2,535
69
2.7%
0.0%
102
4.0%
0.0%
N/A
Yes
CT 529.04, BG 2
1,884
21
1.1 %
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
N/A
No
CT 531.1, BG 1
2,022
171
8.5%
0.0%
-
0.0%
0.0%
N/A
Yes
DSA
6,441
261
4.1%
-
0.0%
102
1.6%
-
0.0%
No
N/A
Wake County
810,604
27,461
3.4%
7,877
1.0%
10,591
1.3%
3,028
0.4%
North Carolina
7,968,262
270,062
3.4%
42,653
0.5%
60,710
0.8%
14,906
0.2%
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019), Table B16004, "Age by Language Spoken at Home by
Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over."

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 20
APPENDIX B: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
1190 E.
. P.�Z-rq
ITT- _
Figure 1: Old Stage Road at Rock Service Station Figure 2: Rock Service Station Road at Old Stage Road,
Road, facing northeast facing northwest
MEA
Figure 3: Old Stage Road at Rock Service Station Figure 4: Community Mart, facing southwest
Road, facing south
Figure 5: Community Mart, facing northeast Figure 6: Community Mart, southernmost entrance, facing
northeast

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 21
---------------
- r
Figure 7: Old Stage Road at Rolling Meadows Drive, Figure 8: Banks Road at Old Stage Road, facing east
facing south
Figure 9: VAD parcel at 10133 Old Stage Road, facing Figure 10: VAD parcel at 10133 Old Stage Road, facing
east northwest
1_
ffi'aielr`�r,� tiaYs Ftz
_
I
Figure 11: Home at 10133 Old Stage Road, facing Figure 12: Home at 10133 Old Stage Road, facing south
east

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 22
APPENDIX C: LOCAL OFFICIAL INPUT FORMS
LOCAL EMS
Keith Lankford
Name:
Planner III
Title:
Wake County Community
Services/Planning, Development &
Agency:
Inspections
Phone:
919-856-7569
Email:
[e-mail]
FIRST CONTACT DATE
METHODS
RESULT
10/17/2022
❑x Email
❑x Form returned on 10/18/2022
❑ Phone
❑ Interview on (date)
❑ In -person
❑ No response
Comments: Keith Lankford responded on
behalf of Braxton Tanner (Fire Marshal,
Chris Colangelo (EMS Director), and Seth
Komansky (Chief of EMS Operations)
LOCAL PLANNER
Keith Lankford
Name:
Planner III
Title:
Wake County Community Services/Planning, Development &
Agency:
Inspections
Phone:
919-856-7569
Email:
[e-mail]
FIRST CONTACT DATE
METHODS
RESULT
10/17/2022
❑x Email
❑ Form returned on 10/18/2022
❑ Phone
❑ Interview on (date)
❑ In -person
❑ No response
Comments: Keith Lankford responded on
behalf of Tim Gardiner (Transportation
Planner), and Sharon Peterson (Long
Range Planning Administrator)
Name: Patrick Young
Title: Planning and Development Director
Agency: City of Raleigh Planning and Development
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
FIRST CONTACT DATE
METHOD(S)
RESULT
10/17/2022
❑x Email
❑ Form returned on (date)
❑ Phone
❑ Interview on (date)
❑ In -person
❑x No response

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 23
LOCAL SCHOOLS
Name: Bonnie Sluder
Title: Director of Logistics and Routing
Agency: Wake County Public Schools
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
FIRST CONTACT DATE METHOD RESULT
10/17/2022 ❑x Email ❑ Form returned on (date)
❑ Phone ❑ Interview on (date)
❑ In -person ❑x No response
Comments:

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 24
Local EMS Input
From: Don Johnson
To: Liz Workman
Cc: Matthew Poole
Subject: Re, HL-0008I Start of Study Notification
Date: Wednesday, Febivary 16, 2022 10:14:09 AM
Attachments: HL-0008I Fin3 TpDoMao.odf
Good Morning Liz,
In reviewing the proposal, our agency has a couple of inquiries regarding the plans for
Old Stage Rd and Flock Service Station Rd.,
What is the accessibility proposal for the Old Stage Rd and Banks Rd intersection, as
well as the intersection of Old Stage and Rolling Meado,,vs? Will either include traffic
signals and will either include additional turn lanes that are not currently existing?
Will northbound Old Stage Rd traffic maintain the ability to make left turns on both
Banks and Rolling Meadows as they currently do? Will those two roads both maintain
the ability to make left turns onto northbound Old Stage Rd. as they currently do?
Your proposal states that "raised medians" will be present on Old Stage Rd., so from
a Public Safety standpoint, our predominant concern is the ability to maintain access
TO both side roads AND access FROM both side to roads to Old Stage Rd north and
sorthbound.
Thank you for the information you've provided and I look forward to hearing from you
regarding our questions about the project.
Sincerely,
Don Johuson I Captain
{:oi77inlinity Risk Reduction
Cff.uler Fire -Rescue Inc.
914 Seventh Ave I Garner, NC 27529
Office 919-772-1550 Emi 205"-violxile 919-880-8770
In,

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 25
Local Planner Input
From:
Keith Lankf�
To:
kanr►3 Salvucci
Subject:
HL-00081 Local Input FE m
Date:
Tuesday, Odhober is, 202 6:06,31 PM
Attachments:
imaueN2.mg
HL-0O08i Local Input Form EMS.doix
Joanna,
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this project. Please ensure that your staff knows to send
these items directly to me at the e-mail address above. I don't see the need on such a small scale
project to complete the full input form, and hope that these comments suffice_ I've consulted
several other staff members from various departments/work rtz ours and we have no concerns about
the proposed project_ The proposed improvements should achieve its objectives of improving traffic
flow and safety in this area and we believe that it will be beneficial to the commuters and the
enerel_public_ We do not have any county-owned/county-related properties in the area that would
be impacted by this project_
We assume that the road is too important to be closed for any periad of time and that there will riot
be an off -site detour (but possibly some individual lane closures at night)_ If that is not the situation,
if there are plans for a road closure and detour, please let us know well in advance of the time of
closure_ Again, we strongly do not went there to be any detour_
Please let me know if you need anything else (919 612-6744)_
Keith A. Lankford, AICP, CZO
Planner III
Wake County Government
Community Services J Planning, Development & Inspections
[e-mail]
919.856-7569 office 1 919.856-5824 fax
P_O. Box 550 Raleigh, NC 276D2
wakegav_com
Wake follows
THEMS
_

STIP HL-0008i o Wake County o SHORT FORM CIA o February, 2023 o page 26
APPENDIX D: OTHER INFORMATION
CROSS STREETS WITHIN THE DCIA
Cross Streets — State Maintained
• Rock Service Station Road — skewed T-intersection with Old Stage Road at the southern portion of the DCIA
o Traffic Control: N/A
o Connectivity: NC 42, Jackson King Road (south)
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Major Collector
o Access To: residential, commercial, retail, community resources
• Quail Point Drive — T-intersection from Old Stage Road, approximately 0.5 miles south of Rock Service Station
Road and Old Stage Road intersection
o Traffic Control: stop sign
o Connectivity: Dead End
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Local
o Access To: Residential properties
• Stageline Drive — T-intersection from Old Stage Road, approximately 0.35 miles south of Rock Service Station
Road and Old Stage Road intersection
o Traffic Control: stop sign
o Connectivity: Passenger Place (west)
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Local
o Access to: Residential properties, Carrier Way, Relay Way
• Panther Hill Road — T-intersection from Rock Service Station Road, approximately 0.22 miles south of Rock
Service Station Road and Old Stage Road intersection
o Traffic Control: stop sign
o Connectivity: Overdale Lane
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Local
o Access To: Residential properties
• Banks —T-intersection from Old Stage Road, approximately 800 feet north of Old Stage Road and Rock Service
Station Road intersection
o Traffic Control: stop sign
o Connectivity: US 401 (Fayetteville Road)
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Local
o Access To: Residential properties, commercial, community resources
• Rolling Meadows Road — T-intersection from Old Stage Road at the northern portion of the DCIA
o Traffic Control: stop sign
o Connectivity: Dead End
o NCDOT Functional Classification: Local
o Access To: Residential properties, retail store, White Post Drive
Collins Farm Road (private, unpaved) — T-intersection from Rock Service Station Road approximately 0.5 miles
south from Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection
o Traffic Control: N/A
o Access To: residential properties
Master Craft Road (private) — T-intersection from Rock Service Station Road, approximately 0.25 miles south of Old
Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection
o Traffic Control: N/A
o Access To: Residential properties
Black Field Road (private, unpaved) — T-intersection from Rock Service Station Road, approximately 145 feet south
of Old Stage Road and Rock Service Station Road intersection
o Traffic Control: N/A

-NRTR-
-IPaC List-
-Threatened & Endangered Species-

Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
STATE
R�
5 9
•! +Punam" s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
November 3, 2021
J. ERIC BOYETTE
SECRETARY
Attention: Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
Division 5 Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
From: Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Office
Subject: Natural resources and protected species memo: Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR
1006) at Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Dr. in
Wake County; TIP: HL-0008I.
Mr. Murray,
Please accept this letter as a summary of the site investigation and protected species memo
for the above referenced project.
STREAMS, BUFFERS, AND WETLANDS:
The project location is within the Neuse River Basin. Numerous headwater streams and
ponds are identified on the USGS topographic map or NRCS Wake County Soil Survey as
having the potential to be located within the project study area or have associated buffers
within the project study area (see attached maps). The site investigation conducted on
October 13, 2021 determined that five ponds and two stream features were present within the
project study area. Pond A is located east of a portion of Old Stage Road, south of the
intersection with Rock Service Station Road. Ponds B and C are located east of a portion of
Rock Service Station Road. Pond D is located east of a portion of Old Stage Road, north of
the intersection with Rock Service Station Road and Pond E is located west of a portion of
Old Stage Road, north of the intersection with Rock Service Station Road. Intermittent
Stream B is identified as flowing from Pond D under Old Stage Road and outlets into Pond
E. Ephemeral/Intermittent Stream C is located at an existing crossing under Old Stage Road,
north of the intersection with Rock Service Station Road. This stream begins to the west of
Old Stage Road and loses jurisdiction at the existing pipe inlet. Ponds A, B, C, and E are
identified on both the USGS topographic map and NRCS Wake County Soil Survey (Pond C
appears as a stream channel on the maps, however, has been impounded to create Pond Q.
Pond D is identified on the NRCS Wake County Soil Survey only. Therefore, all five ponds
have associated buffers. Intermittent Stream B is not identified on the USGS topographic
map or NRCS Wake County Soil Survey and is therefore not buffered.
Ephemeral/Intermittent Stream C is located on the NRCS Wake County Soil Survey map
only, however, NC DWR determined that the feature was not subject to the Neuse River
Buffer Rules on October 6, 2020. No wetlands were identified within the project study area.
See the attached map for general locations of these features along with pictures from the site.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] NORTH DUKE STREET
DIVISION 5 OFFICE Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 DURHAM, NC 27704
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704 Website: www.ncdot.gov
CS# 17-27-03

PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:
If this project involves impacts to the identified streams or ponds, 404 and 401 permits will
be required. Additionally, if this project involves impacts to the associated buffer areas,
Neuse River Buffer Authorizations will be required.
PROTECTED SPECIES:
Note the following for Proposed/Threatened/Endangered/At Risk species in Wake County
based on a review of the USFWS online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database, the NC Natural Heritage (NHP) database, and current USFWS online protected
species list by county.
Bald eagle: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project location.
Additionally, no known NHP occurrences exist in the vicinity of the project study area. There
are no large trees sufficient for eagle's nest, nor were any nests or birds observed during the
site visit. Therefore, based on lack of habitat a biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered
for this species.
Michaux's sumac: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location. Limited
habitat for Michaux's sumac is located within the project limits within the portion of the
study area particularly along the woods edge. A plant by plant survey of the project study
area was conducted on October 13, 2021. No specimens were found during the survey,
therefore, a biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered for this species.
Red -cockaded woodpecker: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, no known NHP occurrences exist for this area. Although where pine trees occur,
they do not comprise of contiguous old growth pine as typically preferred for red -cockaded
woodpecker nest trees. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat a biological conclusion of
No Effect is rendered for this species.
Neuse River waterdog: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source).
Therefore, following the current Programmatic Biological Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse River waterdog
in NCDOT Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (August 3, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Carolina madtom: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however,
the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore,
following the current Programmatic Biological Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/
Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse River waterdog in NCDOT
Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (August 3, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is rendered for
this species.
Atlantic pigtoe: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however, the
project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore, following
the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8
(September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North

Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Dwarf wedgemussel: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source).
Therefore, following the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and
Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions
1-8 (September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Tar River spinymussel: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project
location. Additionally, the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT
source). Therefore, following the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -
Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina,
NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic
Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/
Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a
biological conclusion of No -Effect is rendered for this species since the project is not
within an Identified Stream Reach nor does it occur within a designated critical habitat.
Cape Fear shiner: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project
location. Additionally, the streams identified within the project study area do not
constitute potential habitat for this species by range and there are no known occurrences
of this species near the project area. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat a
biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered for this species.
Yellow lance: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however,
the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore,
following the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8
(September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Northern Long -Eared Bat: The US Fish and Wildlife Service has revised the previous
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina.
The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT
projects and activities. Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are
currently only known in 19 counties, but may potentially occur in 11 additional counties
within Divisions 1-8. NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two conservation
measures which will avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These conservation measures
only apply to the 30 current known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the PBO at
this time. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO will ensure compliance with Section 7 of

the Endangered Species Act for ten years (effective through December 31, 2030) for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes the county where
this project is located.

`� _� • � v � �Z TenTe � V
� �s;N • Gen de• . • s•-•-. • O R
• { 3 a Slo e.Way. • o SR-70'O�
SR°5344; Rollin Farm pr' �!t C s •
m • ' ' e �'
Dail
• ` • a Ceff • „
Trotter Dr
Northvi SR:
• �i
( Ct
heron i
t Cotten Rd owNp, - ; •~
o SR-2T96 • -n ��ao�s-Dr Horse
"' • ° �`ea SaA Creek Rd
`�rd'er - �•
I VI
ca1
getim Dr
Banks Rd
• 0. i CI
Ashton
`��'� O • Pantlie�30� �Q . 7 ckFjeid ,r�' Hollowinr
—`Li,+� • Rustic • pr l =
4tic • a �D o • ^SR_4891 i� r•
/ Country Rqu. �,• C`�?�es0 •
• 3h v 6tickIR f og 1 d �a
5386 Ln
1 =+
' '0 p� ' 'Sta eiin'@�Dr • �b�• ' " ��te(, ��. • - a Q��C�Ce �k -44 0(
''' `^ . � • • � � , " �.ajftF�d'�^ m iaclti�°
c, `�. • ct,� anther �tQ, hQ
q� S rm�� iG 0- �Qudi H o •
d t liv cy co• . Poi
er�d� • � W �� Wy re m � W,00dlin c
:Tr`ac
Bu " board
�S �j a� L+n7 . • 1 • . •SR 2726Ln
�n dhhOh '�� ON •th •' ' t` N C • . Feldmen,E
`Oe cc cyo w • . y3;i3 . v
�8y k 'kis�Ps rq . e q'fP7oe�, ►6`i�a j ; -
`_ • • •" J` `rc''6�� °' q%0� "'JS ' N;. �, • ` Fa nrn Ln _ , �.- - f I r
.Lev'ach-St a ��� o-� c w. • _"`
v-
Ir
OV
? • • � � $g ��S dui`-d� � /;Z,o t�
SS67��7
Pagan. Rd
2�7375 �4 ,i
���� T � a ad• e
oods-Dr • i�
_ a
t o �
aY
- 7 SR=55b • E
0 0.15 0.3 0.45
fa
-` NlCDOT GIS"'Unit, Copyrightt 0 2
Project Location / Miles
NCCGI. , N"C911 Board= q.
yORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
c49o�9 Division of Highways
CO
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99� P�Q HL-00081
TOF TRAWake County
Topographic

x
PLi �. '�� u -
11062
C2
WaC f Co fo62 A NoA
AP Li APC l CSC APB �oG� � � x No8 o�
ti
WaA Nos AllNoB
pC2 , "' ° Go 0 NoB
c r� CEO 2'. f l
1�I�fo`• C�eC2 NOA 4rG2
dC2 Wa8 Nos I `' rLVty f Ly OrB
L Bl
or. ,
ApC .. Nt)E3 � � Nr1Ei t % i �� R7 '' �',-3
CeB2 i� WaB NoB U
Wo NoB V . WaB3�; DrB
'Y
EnC1 } Cg62 Go wo
7 * CgB NoG2 .Ra ..,
1 LYC2
GeC7. CgC d NoA L_v
' NOC2 Q7 ' No8
Lv Z
CeD A :ff? A y qG
k
-� PC Go NOB2 Rai
Ly i2a' I'o , _ . Ly
CeD `"� I+ralr2.---
WY ApF7 No8 NoC N',8 NoA
N o F3 C>
CI63 CIC3 �e2 .. ApC2
" - NoC x
pp _ApH2 Ly � fro 6
—�� ee(�2 ApC2 Radio lower
I!Rra APC NoA NoB
CIE3 _ ... j wo Ce02 4
C P D NoB2 i I NoB
ApC'2
CIB3
CeC ApC Ae _
Ce�G i 1� "
IL CC82 G�� � AgC ' CeC' pB2
ClE3 A ., NoB(::_
WaA
ApB (30
y AR
i
idti2 /fp62 Me NOB2 yy
tryC 1 W° , CcB2AgB2 . ti
C862 � � n{a{;:"`� ac \ p Wv
,,� N U B
Cr�FGo
AfA-'� M P� \ P4
? i Me v NoB L) NoB
CIC3 CeC? C� Go—kA aA
!` UNmE l cQ Wa!3
_ waG.
NoC2ac
A •� i . AgC2 JWo,1 WaB
�+ 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Project Location N°C n
e� MIIeS''911 Boarid
yORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
°490�Division of Highways
y 9
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99r P�Q HL-00081
TOF TRAWake County
NRCS Soil

' h '
`2 '" !
G fWVvi
y -k
. Me Ltd/
doiv Mead°ws Dr
r
� t
Ephemeral/I ntermittent
Stream C
Drainage A Data Point
Ephemeral/ i
Intermittent Stream C
Data Point p
5
Banks Rd Intermittent Stream B
SR-
t. `1 w Pond E v .-
+ Pond D
s
Intermittent Stream B
Data Point Pond B Ra
i
Pond A� Existing RCP
i
a 7
`a o
_ Panther+. �+
T
G°��trS A .r +F f> �
0 0.09 0.18 0.27
Project Location
Miles'
NORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
9
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99� Q�Q HL-00081
rOFTRANSQ° Wake County
Delineation Aerial

1.4,i.4
f}
s .s� n 3. .yi SM'4 y rii4 f -tyf
k.i.mPFH
Photo of Pond C (southern
portion)
Photo north towards Pond B

i
-� •:-�,� -�. k _
. r� � .. , . , ,. � .,fir;
q Or
fir" i
Mr ,
Y �

Photo of Intermittent Stream B
looking towards pipe inlet
Photo below pipe outlet of
drainage A at Drainage A Data
Point
Photo of Intermittent Stream B
looking towards Pond D
Photo above pipe inlet of
Ephemeral/Intermittent Stream C

Photo above pipe inlet of
Ephemeral/Intermittent Stream C

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.
REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH -CAROLINA
i5rrwrronmerrtal Quality
October 6, 2020
To: Heather Montague, Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT Division 5
From: Rob Ridings, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: NCDOT Project HL-008I, SR 1006, Unnamed Drainage Feature in Neuse Basin, Wake County.
DWR#20201365
Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213.0233)
Dear Ms Montague:
The NC Division of Water Resources reviewed your Buffer Determination Request of a drainage feature at the referenced location in
your request dated October 5, 2020. The listed drainage feature are approximated on referenced package received by DWR.
NCDWR has confirmed that the drainage feature is approximated as follows:
Feature A (Lat 35.63900, Long-78.67109): Ephemeral. NOT subject to Buffer Rules.
No other stream or buffer sites were included in this request. Also, this letter only addresses applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules at
the site specifically referenced and does not apply to reaches of the channels further downstream, or upstream, from the project area,
or to any other drainage features in the vicinity.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffer, Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers must comply with the
Jordan Buffer Rules, 404/401 regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B .0216), and any other required federal, state and
local regulations.
Please be aware that even if no direct impacts are proposed to the protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater runoff as per
15A NCAC 213.0233 is required.
The owner (or future owners) or permittee should notify NCDWR (and other relevant agencies) of this determination in any future
correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this
letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman, NCDWR Transportation Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the mitigation
rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative hearings. You must
file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice and the date the affected
party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in
the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday

through Friday between the hours of 8:OOam and 5:OOpm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the
petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings
within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please contact Rob Ridings at rob.ridingskncdenr.gov.

STATE
R�
5 9
•! +Punam" s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
October 11, 2022
Memo To File:
From: Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Office
J. ERIC BOYETTE
SECRETARY
Subject: Updated natural resources and protected species memo for study area
expansion: Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) at Rock Service Station Rd. (SR
2736) to Rolling Meadows Dr. in Wake County; TIP: HL-0008I.
STREAMS, BUFFERS, AND WETLANDS:
The project location is within the Neuse River Basin. A site investigation and PJD were
completed for the original study area on October 13, 2021 and January 7, 2022 respectively.
The site investigation identified a total of five buffered pond features and two stream features
that are not buffered within the project study area. Additionally, no wetlands were identified
within the original study area (see NRTR dated November 3, 2021). A study area expansion
was proposed on October 10, 2022. An updated site investigation was completed for the
additional portions of the project study area on October 11, 2022. No additional streams,
ponds, or associated buffers were identified within the expanded area. Additionally, no
wetlands were identified within the expanded area.
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:
If this project involves impacts to the identified streams or ponds, 404 and 401 permits will
be required. Additionally, if this project involves impacts to the associated buffer areas,
Neuse River Buffer Authorizations will be required.
PROTECTED SPECIES:
Note the following for Proposed/Threatened/Endangered/At Risk species in Wake County
based on a review of the USFWS online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database.
Bald eagle: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project location.
Additionally, no known NHP occurrences exist in the vicinity of the revised project study
area. There are no large trees sufficient for eagle's nest, nor were any nests or birds observed
during the site visits. Therefore, based on lack of habitat a biological conclusion of No Effect
is rendered for this species.
Michaux's sumac: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location. Limited
habitat for Michaux's sumac is located within the project limits within the portion of the
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax. [phone] NORTH DUKE STREET
DIVISION 5 OFFICE Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 DURHAM, NC 27704
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704 Website: www.ncdot.gov
CS# 17-27-03

revised study area particularly along the woods edge. A plant by plant survey of the project
study area was conducted on October 11, 2022. No specimens were found during the survey,
therefore, a biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered for this species.
Red -cockaded woodpecker: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, no known NHP occurrences exist for this area. Although where pine trees occur,
they do not comprise of contiguous old growth pine as typically preferred for red -cockaded
woodpecker nest trees. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat a biological conclusion of
No Effect is rendered for this species.
Neuse River waterdog: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source).
Therefore, following the current Programmatic Biological Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse River waterdog
in NCDOT Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (August 3, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Carolina madtom: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however,
the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore,
following the current Programmatic Biological Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/
Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse River waterdog in NCDOT
Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (August 3, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is rendered for
this species.
Atlantic pigtoe: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however, the
project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore, following
the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8
(September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Dwarf wedgemussel: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location,
however, the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source).
Therefore, following the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and
Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions
1-8 (September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.
Yellow lance: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location, however,
the project is well beyond any Identified Stream Reach (NCDOT source). Therefore,
following the revised Programmatic Biological /Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8
(September 11, 2019) with addendum to Revised Programmatic Biological /Conference
Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (June 1, 2021), a biological conclusion of MA-NLAA is
rendered for this species.

Northern Long -Eared Bat: The US Fish and Wildlife Service has revised the previous
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina.
The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT
projects and activities. Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are
currently only known in 19 counties, but may potentially occur in 11 additional counties
within Divisions 1-8. NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two conservation
measures which will avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These conservation measures
only apply to the 30 current known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the PBO at
this time. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO will ensure compliance with Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act for ten years (effective through December 31, 2030) for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes the county where
this project is located.

r
ii
Field R�
-0ac
k\
0.07 0.15
0.3 Mil
North Carolina Department of Transportation N
t4ORTI{ CqR O Division of Highways HL-0008I
u, 7 Widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006)
from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736)
to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884)
���TOFTRANyeO Wake County Vicinity

Banks Rd
L
�o
°^ c
v �
Q 0
lJ Z
W =)
= a'
SR-2724
Rolling
MeadowsDr
SR-3884 '
10
0
0
Back Field Rd
wAshton
Hollow Dr
J, Ei SR-4891
s
m
L-
n
N_
0� �0
l 7
Stageline'Ar,"� v
SR
LA�'-3764
�\e A
10
co
w l� �� r
0.,07 0.15 0.3 Mile - y
North Carolina Department of Transportation N
t4ORT11 cq Division of Highways HL-0008I
O
R
GOD
Widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006)
from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736)
�° to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884)
���TOFTRAN5e0 Wake County Topographic

PD NoR
No
W au f1 B
NoB Apt f 11�,3 W a B
gI32
NoG
or
CgC2
A � f�iy �f yhy
kg(3.I C
Ce
ApC i"a
�i
' Nat;.
A Nu
h1
No 4
_ — ,
.—
y
Radio Tows-7c
C i`
A. C
oB2 N
B
�} o
OGo
ApH
*C� 0.07 0.15 0.3 Mile
North Carolina Department of Transportation N
tAoRTH cq o Division of Highways HL-0008I
R
y 9 Widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006)
from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736)
to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884)
OFTRANSe Wake County NRCS Soil Survey

0
o f tyoRTHit o'Olt
�o
OF TRANSQ
a _ �zuR4 i► i i! ..
M
��. Ashton'
Hollow_Di
6 F
"is SR'
io
HL-0008I Original Study-
Area
e;
... ; - Q CAM PO_ Alt_StudyArea -
m
, PIn
0.07 0.15 0.3 MiliI I I I I I
e r
y..
North Carolina Department of Transportation N
Division of Highways HL-0008I
Widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006)
from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736)
to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884)
Wake County Original v New
Study Area

Photo facing southeast
toward pond B
IR
-t. - _ -
ti
Photo facing southeast along
Rock Service Station Road

Photo facing northwest along Rock
Service Station Road
Photo facing northwest along
Rock Service Station Road

srArmo,N
y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J.R. "JOEY" HOPKINs
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 6, 2024
To: File
From: Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Office
Subject: Protected Species Update Memo for HL-0008I in Wake County: Widen Old
Stage Road (SR 1006) at Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) to Rolling
Meadows Dr.
Please accept this letter as a summary of the efforts made and resulting findings on the part of
NCDOT Division 5 to update the biological conclusions of protected species for the above
referenced project.
Michaux's sumac: IPaC identifies potential for this species at the project location. Limited
habitat for Michaux's sumac is located within the project study area, particularly within the
portion along the woods edge. A plant by plant survey of the project study area was
conducted on June 5, 2024. No specimens were found during the survey, therefore, a
biological conclusion of No Effect is rendered for this species.
Northern Long -Eared Bat: The USFWS has issued a revised Programmatic Biological
Opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB)
(Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina (December 15, 2022). The revised PBO
covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and
activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The revised PBO will ensure compliance with Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act for ten years (effective through December 31, 2030) for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8. Although this PBO covers Divisions
1-8, the USFWS only considers NLEBs to be known or potentially found in 30 counties
within Divisions 1-8. Note that none of these 30 counties are located within Division 5.
NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two Conservation Measures which will
avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These Conservation Measures only apply to the 30
current known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the revised PBO and do not include
any parts of Division 5. Additionally, NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to three
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements to monitor the impacts of incidental take. (Note:
M&R2 is adhered to by Biological Surveys Group (BSG) and is not discussed below).
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] NORTH DUKE STREET
DIVISION 5 OFFICE Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 DURHAM, NC 27704
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704 Website: www.ncdot.gov
CS 9 17-27-03

M&Rl: If dead bats suspected of being NLEB are observed during clearing,
demolition, or construction activities of the Action, such bats should be collected and
preserved for identification. Gary Jordan of the USFWS Raleigh Field Office should be
contacted at gary [e-mail] to arrange transfer of the bats. Dead bats should be placed
in a freezer until they can be transferred.
M&R3: NCDOT staff and/or consultants must follow the NCDOT Bat Habitat
Assessment SOP by filling out Bat Habitat Assessment Forms for projects that affect bridges
and culverts. Minimum dimensions for conducting a culvert survey are 5 feet in height and
60 feet in length. Bridge and structure assessments are valid for two years. These forms will
be submitted to the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group (BSG) using the Survey 123
application or submitted to the NCDOT Project Manager and NCDOT Sharepoint site and
notification sent to BSG&ncdot.gov. BSG staff will enter the forms into its database even if
no bat presence is detected. If NLEBs are detected at a bridge or culvert, the USFWS will be
notified via email at gary [e-mail].
Tricolored Bat: The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has issued a Programmatic
Conference Opinion (PCO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the tricolored bat
(TCB) (Perimyotis subflavus) in eastern North Carolina (November 20, 2023). The PCO
covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and
activities. The programmatic determination for TCB for the NCDOT program is May Affect,
Likely to Adversely Affect. Once the TCB is officially listed, the PCO will become the
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) by formal request from FHWA and USACE. The
PBO will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for approximately
five years (effective through December 31, 2028) for all NCDOT projects with a federal
nexus in Divisions 1-8. NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have agreed to three conservation
measures (listed in the PCO) which will avoid/minimize take to TCBs. These conservation
measures apply to all counties in Divisions 1-8. Note that at this time, no TCB maternity
roost trees have been identified in Divisions 1-8. Additionally, NCDOT, FHWA, and
USACE have agreed to two Monitoring and Reporting Requirements.
M&Rl: If dead bats suspected of being TCB are observed during clearing,
demolition, or construction activities of the Action, such bats should be collected and
preserved for identification. Gary Jordan of the USFWS Raleigh Field Office should be
contacted at gary iordangfws.gov to arrange transfer of the bats. Dead bats should be placed
in a freezer until they can be transferred.
M&R2: NCDOT staff and/or consultants must follow the NCDOT Bat Habitat
Assessment SOP by filling out Bat Habitat Assessment Forms for projects that affect bridges
and culverts. Minimum dimensions for conducting a culvert survey are 5 feet in height and
60 feet in length. Bridge and structure assessments are valid for two years. These forms will
be submitted to the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group (BSG) using the Survey 123
application or submitted to the NCDOT Project Manager and NCDOT Sharepoint site and
notification sent to BSG&ncdot.gov. BSG staff will enter the forms into its database even if
no bat presence is detected. If TCBs are detected at a bridge or culvert, the USFWS will be
notified via email at gM iordangfws.gov.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
mcwimberleykncdot.gov or at [phone].

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
L=A
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 1 /17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
�o�
Foy
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 2/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required. OF �>
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly. r -
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 3/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
STATUS
Endangered
STAT
US 0
T
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location doe
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp�/Species/6772
6
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 4/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
4 pkllllll�
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
0 STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on
all above listed species.
Bald &Golden Eagles
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 5/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act' and
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
bald or golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-i n c i d e nta 1-ta ke-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-informatiorgratory-b ids>-a�ncl-balcl-ancl-
golden-e gles-may-occur-pLoject-actio
There are likely bald eagles present in your project a. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity_
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAM XE(-
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Probability of Presence Summary
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 6/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week
12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 7/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES ]AN FEB MAR APR MAY 1UN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 1111 IA 11—+ -- - -11- - I - J+1 ++-4 - I - I +-++— 1+11 1111 1-11
Non -BCC ��■ � J V� MMMM MMMM ��■
Vulnerable
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified
location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The
AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in
that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool -
111111,
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS fir of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if
you have questions.
Migratory birds
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 8/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds --WoA
migratory -birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.d
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC"
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-
golden-eagles-may-occur-project-actio n ft/
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
JSFWS Birds of Conservation CQncM (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7VVDONGZS6EE/resources 9/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/1626
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. OASIJ1100
►7
Chuck-will's-widow Antrostomus carolinensis- Breeds May 10 to Jul 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Coastal (wayne s) Black -throated Green Warbler Breeds May 1 to Aug 15
Setophaga virens waynei
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Geothlypis formosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 10/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles"specifically the FAQ section titled
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
- \0'%A-
Probability of Presence()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7WDONGZS6EE/resources 11 /17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number o
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. They
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. , \ \
'do it NL
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe '
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
� u probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Jill Illill Jill Jill +++— I I I I I I 1 1 —14
Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Non
-BC Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill —�—+ III Jill Ill, 1111
Vulnerable
Brown -headed Nuthatch Jill Ill I Jill pill 11-1
BCC - BCR
Chimney Swift �" Jill lilk 1114-1-4-11 7i7l +Il- Ill+ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chuck-will's- ++++ +—�+ ++—+ --'— —111 Jill 11-4 . —+-+ +++— ++++ ++++ +—...
widow
BCC - BCR
https://ipac.ecosphere.fvvs.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 12/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Coastal ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++1+ ++++ ++++
(wayne s)
Black -throated
Green Warbler
BCC - BCR
Eastern Whip- I +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++� ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
poor -will rmm�
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky ++++ ++++ ++++ +++I I'++ +++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler +++++ ++++ ++++ ++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothon
Warblerotary ++++ ++++ ++++ 11111111
UP
� +++� I I I i + +++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed —�" '— ++'+ ++++ +--'
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird + +
BCC - BCR
SPECIES ]AN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Wood Thrush ++++ +—�— I ji+ +'_�'"' +"— ++++ ++++ +—_+
BCC Rangewide ____ _
(CON) Ar
0"k
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Natlbnwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 13/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., bandingarik
citizen science datasets. _N;�A
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the IIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 14/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. '�4
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report 4C �ko
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other
birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of
presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint.
On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar)
and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key
component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more
dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack
of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they
might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more
about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to
avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 15/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. �A
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District. �
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. VOr
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER POND
INO)
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R4SBC
Joir
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory
website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 16/17

7/25/24, 3:16 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
Imagery.
Data precautions
111
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. VOr
Xw)
FOB
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7GPKZCIANRBH5LY7vvDONGZS6EE/resources 17/17

PJD request & USACE letter

STATE
R�
5 9
•! +Punam" s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J. ERic BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 29, 2021
Mr. Andrew Williams
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: UPDATED Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for HL-0008I: Widen Old Stage
Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884);
Wake County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Williams,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen Old Stage Road (SR 1006)
from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) to Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884) in Wake County, North
Carolina. NCDOT staff have completed a delineation of the study area. The attached information, including
required forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review and determination of jurisdiction under the
Clean Water Act.
Project Description and Methodology
As shown in figures below, the HL-0008I study area is approximately 46.7 acres in size and located in
Wake County within the Neuse River basin. The study area encompasses a portion of Old Stage Road in
the vicinity of Rolling Meadows Drive to south of Rock Service Station Road, including a portion of Rock
Service Station Road to Panther Hill Lane and a portion of Banks Road.
Streams were assessed based on field indications of ordinary high water mark and the NC Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Form Version 4.11. Streams within the study area that
were intermittent or degraded perennial were assessed using the NC Stream Assessment Method (NC
SAM).
Delineation Results
During the site investigation conducted on October 13, 2021 and field review with the USACE on October
27, 2021, five potential ponds, one potentially intermittent stream channel, and one potentially
ephemeral/intermittent stream channel were identified within the project study area. No wetlands were
identified within the project study area. Potential Pond A was observed to be located along the eastern
boundary of Old Stage Road immediately north of the intersection with Stageline Drive. This feature
appears on both the USGS topographic map and NRCS Soil Survey and based on review of aerial maps is
ponded year round. Potential Ponds B and C were observed to be located along the eastern boundary of
Rock Service Station Road separated by an existing driveway, immediately south of the intersection with
Old Stage Road. Potential Pond B appears on both the USGS topographic map and NRCS Soil Survey. A
stream channel appears on these maps as draining from the southern portion of the pond, however, the site
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] NORTH DUKE STREET
DIVISION 5 OFFICE Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 DURHAM, NC 27704
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704 Website: www.ncdot.gov
CS# 17-27-03

investigation determined that previous disturbance to this channel has caused the channel to be impounded
and a second ponded area (Potential Pond C) to form in the footprint of the mapped channel. Potential
Ponds D and E were observed to be located on the eastern and western boundaries of the study area
respectively, immediately south of the intersection with Banks Road. Potential Pond E appears on both the
USGS topographic map and NRCS Soil Survey and the site investigation revealed that the potential pond is
acting as a maintained landscape feature. Potential Pond D appears on the NRCS Soil Survey map,
however, does not appear on the USGS topographic map. Review of aerial maps indicates this feature
remains ponded year round. Additionally, Potentially Intermittent Stream B was observed to drain from the
western boundary of Potential Pond D, through an existing RCP under Old Stage Road into Potential Pond
E. Potentially Intermittent Stream B was observed to be lined with rip rap through the entire length to the
inlet of the RCP. Finally, Potentially Ephemeral/Intermittent Stream C was observed to begin on the west
side of Old Stage Road north of the intersection with Banks Road and drains through an existing RCP
under Old Stage Road to the southeast. The drainageway on the southeast side of Old Stage Road loses
characteristics of hydric soil and defined bed and bank and is therefore not considered jurisdictional
(Drainage A Data Point). This feature appears on the NRCS Soil Survey, however, site investigation
concluded that the channel to the west of Old Stage Road has characteristics of hydric soil and defined bed
and bank while the channel to the southeast of Old Stage Road loses these characteristics and is
predominately comprised of a maintained grass swale (see attached forms, photos, and maps).
Table 1. Potential Streams in the Study Area
Stream Name
Map ID
NCDWR Index
Number
Best Usage
Classification
REMOVED
Potential Stream A
REMOVED
REMOVED
UT to Panther
Branch
Potential Stream B
27-43-15-9
C;NS W
UT to Little Creek
I Potential Stream C
27-43-15-10
C;NSW
Table 2. Characteristics of Potential Jurisdictional Streams in the Study Area
Map ID
Length (ft.)
Classification
River Basin
Appears on
Appears on
Buffer
USGS Topo
NRCS Soil
Map?
Survey?
Potential
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
Stream A
Potential
100
Intermittent
Not Subject
No
No
Stream B
Potential
140
Ephemeral/Intermittent
Not Subject
No
Yes
Stream C
(Buffer Kick -out
from NCDWR
dated October 6,
2020)
Table 3. Potential Ponds in the Study Area
Map ID
Area (ac.)
River Basin Buffer
Appears on USGS
To o Map?
Appears on NRCS
Soil Survey?
Potential Pond A
1.1
Subject
Yes
Yes
Potential Pond B
0.85
Subject
Yes
Yes
Potential Pond C
0.4
Subject
Yes
Yes
Potential Pond D
0.1
Subject
No
Yes
Potential Pond E
0.5
Subject
Yes
Yes
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

If you have any questions, require additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please
contact me by phone at [phone] or email at mcwimberleygncdot.gov. This is a request for
concurrence with our assessment. We appreciate your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
Mitchell C. Wimberley
Division 5 Environmental Specialist
Attachments:
-Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Request Form
-Vicinity Map
-Aerial Map
-USGS Topographic Map
-NRCS Soil Survey Map
-Delineation Maps
-Site Photos
-Stream Data Forms
-NC SAM Forms
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 10128 Old Stage Road
City, State: Garner, NC
County:
Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A Transportation Project
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: NCDOT - ATTN: Mitchell Wimberl
Mailing Address: 2612 North Duke St
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Durham, NC 27704
[phone]
[e-mail]
❑ I am the current property owner
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address: 2612 North Duke St
Durham, NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 46.7 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.634567
Longitude:-78.671323
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
F] Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Trotter Dr
N �P
a
C a x
`y O`
c`
c
Meadows Or
Banks Rd
Fs , E
o`
z
C A
J Q
O
Q
b
4¢
co Ashton Honow Dr
v
e
pki
�'0
oy Or
stageiine or u�
m ,S`
K
ik c(a,` R0 av
Maser a`
D
C
AN an�net HQ �n _ o
:t 1 m
....., ..s i O
r` Wynne TraoeCt
�o
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, U�^� ini^or nnr niT o nio^ r "
Project Location Jap, , anMETIEsri China (Hong 10 0•1 0.2 0.3
OpenStreetMap contributors, am Miles
yORTh North Carolina Department of Transportation
°g90CDivision of Highways
ca 9
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99� Q�Q HL-00081
"OFTRANSe° Wake County
Vicinity

`� _� • � v � �Z TenTe � V
� �s;N • Gen de• . • s•-•-. • O R
• { 3 a Slo e.Way. • o SR-70'O�
SR°5344; Rollin Farm pr' �!t C s •
m • ' ' e �'
Dail
• ` • a Ceff • „
Trotter Dr
Northvi SR:
• �i
( Ct
heron i
t Cotten Rd owNp, - ; •~
o SR-2T96 • -n ��ao�s-Dr Horse
"' • ° �`ea SaA Creek Rd
`�rd'er - �•
I VI
ca1
getim Dr
Banks Rd
• 0. i CI
Ashton
`��'� O • Pantlie�30� �Q . 7 ckFjeid ,r�' Hollowinr
—`Li,+� • Rustic • pr l =
4tic • a �D o • ^SR_4891 i� r•
/ Country Rqu. �,• C`�?�es0 •
• 3h v 6tickIR f og 1 d �a
5386 Ln
1 =+
' '0 p� ' 'Sta eiin'@�Dr • �b�• ' " ��te(, ��. • - a Q��C�Ce �k -44 0(
''' `^ . � • • � � , " �.ajftF�d'�^ m iaclti�°
c, `�. • ct,� anther �tQ, hQ
q� S rm�� iG 0- �Qudi H o •
d t liv cy co• . Poi
er�d� • � W �� Wy re m � W,00dlin c
:Tr`ac
Bu " board
�S �j a� L+n7 . • 1 • . •SR 2726Ln
�n dhhOh '�� ON •th •' ' t` N C • . Feldmen,E
`Oe cc cyo w • . y3;i3 . v
�8y k 'kis�Ps rq . e q'fP7oe�, ►6`i�a j ; -
`_ • • •" J` `rc''6�� °' q%0� "'JS ' N;. �, • ` Fa nrn Ln _ , �.- - f I r
.Lev'ach-St a ��� o-� c w. • _"`
v-
Ir
OV
? • • � � $g ��S dui`-d� � /;Z,o t�
SS67��7
Pagan. Rd
2�7375 �4 ,i
���� T � a ad• e
oods-Dr • i�
_ a
t o �
aY
- 7 SR=55b • E
0 0.15 0.3 0.45
fa
-` NlCDOT GIS"'Unit, Copyrightt 0 2
Project Location / Miles
NCCGI. , N"C911 Board= q.
yORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
c49o�9 Division of Highways
CO
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99� P�Q HL-00081
TOF TRAWake County
Topographic

x
PLi �. '�� u -
11062
C2
WaC f Co fo62 A NoA
AP Li APC l CSC APB �oG� � � x No8 o�
ti
WaA Nos AllNoB
pC2 , "' ° Go 0 NoB
c r� CEO 2'. f l
1�I�fo`• C�eC2 NOA 4rG2
dC2 Wa8 Nos I `' rLVty f Ly OrB
L Bl
or. ,
ApC .. Nt)E3 � � Nr1Ei t % i �� R7 '' �',-3
CeB2 i� WaB NoB U
Wo NoB V . WaB3�; DrB
'Y
EnC1 } Cg62 Go wo
7 * CgB NoG2 .Ra ..,
1 LYC2
GeC7. CgC d NoA L_v
' NOC2 Q7 ' No8
Lv Z
CeD A :ff? A y qG
k
-� PC Go NOB2 Rai
Ly i2a' I'o , _ . Ly
CeD `"� I+ralr2.---
WY ApF7 No8 NoC N',8 NoA
N o F3 C>
CI63 CIC3 �e2 .. ApC2
" - NoC x
pp _ApH2 Ly � fro 6
—�� ee(�2 ApC2 Radio lower
I!Rra APC NoA NoB
CIE3 _ ... j wo Ce02 4
C P D NoB2 i I NoB
ApC'2
CIB3
CeC ApC Ae _
Ce�G i 1� "
IL CC82 G�� � AgC ' CeC' pB2
ClE3 A ., NoB(::_
WaA
ApB (30
y AR
i
idti2 /fp62 Me NOB2 yy
tryC 1 W° , CcB2AgB2 . ti
C862 � � n{a{;:"`� ac \ p Wv
,,� N U B
Cr�FGo
AfA-'� M P� \ P4
? i Me v NoB L) NoB
CIC3 CeC? C� Go—kA aA
!` UNmE l cQ Wa!3
_ waG.
NoC2ac
A •� i . AgC2 JWo,1 WaB
�+ 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Project Location N°C n
e� MIIeS''911 Boarid
yORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
°490�Division of Highways
y 9
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736)
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99r P�Q HL-00081
TOF TRAWake County
NRCS Soil

I. 11W F. 8.
T
Potential Ephemeral/
Intermittent Stream C
Drainage A Data Point
Potential Ephemeral/
Intermittent Stream C
Data Point "° p
4 i
�k5 Ra Potential Intermittent
sR-2•72a" -''- - -,r►' o Stream B
r Potential Pond E
W Potential Pond D
Potential Intermittent
Stream B Data Point Potential Pond B
Potential Pond A , err? Existing RCP
6
Potential Pond C
SR-3764 ',. e�d�t
h b
^�b
s
ev
0 0.09 0.18 0.27
Project Location
WE
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) 10-13-21
to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
HL-00081
Wake County
Delineation Aerial
t

Me' toy
• d0w Mead°ws
Or / •
SR3 • � f1
'd
Potential Ephemeral/ 0 d
Intermittent Stream C
• 11
Drainage A Data Point
I
Potential Ephemeral/
Intermittent Stream C ' ' - 4 —
Data Point
Banks Rd ,o
Potential Intermittent
I • / o Stream B
J r 7 • 7 • • y.d'.
i W Potential Pond E
� 0 f • Potential Pond D
CL
Potential Intermittent 11RO
Stream B Data Point Potential Pond B
� � 1
• Potential Pond A
y1• Existing RCP
• ^tea •
• �` 8 Potential Pond C
• St, eline Dr �` • j
is • • 00 • � � ' aS�tt d � 7 • a
n L er
• 'rc a
do
v �
v ,
- Project Location NDO• T GIS 11niY Cog`lit 20 0.09 0.18 0.27
NCCGIA, NC911 Board.- Mlles'
yORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
°490�Division of Highways
y 9
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) 10-13-21
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99r PA HL-00081
TOF TRAWake County
Delineation Topo

W o C_ G2
o
s
APC
Was NO t
g o
r G� N�oB
1
NoB ApO.,
gel Go Wo
(Noa
NoA L
Potential Ephemeral/
Intermittent Stream C i
CApC 32
Ly
W Y Ap Potential Ephemeral/ `
- gC '_' �c�B
Intermittent Stream C
wry Data Point Na€ 'r
Cn Potential Intermittent
Stream B
p � ?l\ '.
ME
PC Radio Potential Poi Potential Pond D fi ()
_ O C�
Potential Intermittent
wo Cep' Stream B Data Point Potential P 1�3
. Potential Pond A
—xisting RL
t? D
013\
gC P132 Potential Pond C
IAg
_
! ] B
., �� } � ..
J4 Ma i NoB2
Ap
Project Location 0 0.09 0.18 0.27
Miles
NORTH North Carolina Department of Transportation
°g9oC9 Division of Highways
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) 10-13-21
o to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
99� Q�Q HL-00081
rOFTRANSQ° Wake County
Delineation Soil

Photo of Potential Pond C
(southern portion)
Photo north towards Potential Pond B

`�
,`�::
��
��_ �
_ --�� _
���
�;��
-
�th_.
_
�}��
r t'C'�' =
Y�h`�
t � '. ; }
A
���
t�•. � � to �j:Tz ..
dre� �,}�t
y��
R
P
���:45 if,� ��
�' S� '.; fir,
al � 1 1�a�- i
� I � ,:�
'�' � �r� ter~ f
r ,
Y �
� z�. T �
u ptit' #,a — � t
.� �
..._. ...
_ ..;
_,
k.
�� � � i i ' is j� j ll'• �i. 1,� � � +.
� �'al �y;a '� f �% ��� �{t
� �. � _ ����; ,_ L
�� - >. �
�_�

Photo of Potential Intermittent
Stream B looking towards pipe
inlet
Photo below pipe outlet of
drainage A at Drainage A Data
Point
Photo of Potential Intermittent
Stream B looking towards
Potential Pond D
Photo above pipe inlet of
Potential Ephemeral/Intermittent
Stream C

Photo above pipe inlet of
Potential Ephemeral/Intermittent
Stream C

Stream ID: Potential Stream B
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
10/13/2021
Project/Site:
HL-0008I
Latitude:
35.635587
Evaluator:
MCW and HWM
County:
Wake
Longitude:
-78.671183
Total Points:
other:
Raleigh
Stream is at least intermittent if
16
Stream
Intermittent (highly disturbed
e.g. Quad Name
> 19 or perennial if> 30
Determination:
causing rating to be lower)
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 8.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
1
2
3
1
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
pool sequence
0
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 1.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0 1
0.5
1
1 1.5
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; 0BL=1.5 ther=0
0
*perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Highly disturbed portion of stream channel. Rip rap channel
from pond that enters RCP under roadway before outlet into
adjacent pond. Disturbance, alterations, and nearby
vegetation maintenance has lowered the rating and channel
possibly intermittent.
Bank Height (feet)
0.2
Bankfull Width (feet)
1
Water Depth (inches)
0
Channel Substrate
rip rap
Velocity:
Clarity:
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): HL-00081 2. Date of evaluation: 10-13-21
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDOT 4. Assessor name/organization: MCW
5. County: Wake 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Neuse on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Little Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.635587,-78.671183
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Potential Stream
9. Site number (show on attached map): B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) 2 E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y U)C ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ❑Yes ®No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
®B ®B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ®C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ®No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Potential Stream B
Draft NIC SAM Stream Rating
Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name HL-00081 Date of Assessment 10-13-21
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization MCW
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Stream ID: Potential Stream C
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
10/13/2021
Project/Site:
HL-0008I
Latitude:
35.639063
Evaluator:
MCW and HWM
County:
Wake
Longitude:
-78.671154
Total Points:
other:
Raleigh
Stream is at least intermittent if
13.25
Stream
Ephemeral
e.g. Quad Name
> 19 orperenruatit> 30
Determination:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 4.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1 2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 2
3
1
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
0
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
11
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1 11
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 4
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1
1 1.5
1 0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 4.75
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0.75
*perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Highly disturbed portion of stream channel. Rip rap channel
from pond that enters RCP under roadway before outlet into
adjacent pond. Disturbance, alterations, and nearby
vegetation maintenance has lowered the rating and channel
possibly intermittent.
Bank Height (feet)
1.2
Bankfull Width (feet)
1
Water Depth (inches)
0
Channel Substrate
Loam
Velocity:
Clarity:
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):
HL-00081
2. Date of evaluation: 10-13-21 and 10-27-21
3. Applicant/owner name:
NCDOT
4. Assessor name/organization: Mitchell Wimbe
5. County:
Wake
6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin:
Neuse
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Little Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.639063,-78.671154
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream C 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 140
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1.2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ®No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) 2 E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y rC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ❑Yes ®No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
®C ®C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ®D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
®B ®B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Draft NIC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Potential Stream C
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name HL-00081 Date of Assessment 10-13-21 and 10-27-21
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization Mitchell Wimberley
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/01/2020
Project/Site: HL-008I
Latitude: 35.63900
Evaluator: Heather W. Montague, NCDOT DIV 5 DEO
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.67109
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3 Feature A
termination (circle one)
Other
Lake Wheeler
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 3 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
D
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
'D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
C No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
<Z>
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
CUD
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
CD
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
�D
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
M
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
O
0.5
1
1
1 1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Feature A can be be described as a well maintained ditch
Sketch:
see attached street view screen shots as photographs

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.
REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH -CAROLINA
i5rrwrronmerrtal Quality
October 6, 2020
To: Heather Montague, Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT Division 5
From: Rob Ridings, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: NCDOT Project HL-008I, SR 1006, Unnamed Drainage Feature in Neuse Basin, Wake County.
DWR#20201365
Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213.0233)
Dear Ms Montague:
The NC Division of Water Resources reviewed your Buffer Determination Request of a drainage feature at the referenced location in
your request dated October 5, 2020. The listed drainage feature are approximated on referenced package received by DWR.
NCDWR has confirmed that the drainage feature is approximated as follows:
Feature A (Lat 35.63900, Long-78.67109): Ephemeral. NOT subject to Buffer Rules.
No other stream or buffer sites were included in this request. Also, this letter only addresses applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules at
the site specifically referenced and does not apply to reaches of the channels further downstream, or upstream, from the project area,
or to any other drainage features in the vicinity.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffer, Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers must comply with the
Jordan Buffer Rules, 404/401 regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B .0216), and any other required federal, state and
local regulations.
Please be aware that even if no direct impacts are proposed to the protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater runoff as per
15A NCAC 213.0233 is required.
The owner (or future owners) or permittee should notify NCDWR (and other relevant agencies) of this determination in any future
correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this
letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water
exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman, NCDWR Transportation Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the mitigation
rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative hearings. You must
file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice and the date the affected
party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in
the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday

through Friday between the hours of 8:OOam and 5:OOpm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the
petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings
within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please contact Rob Ridings at rob.ridingskncdenr.gov.

Potential Stream A (UT to Little Creek)
)tential Stream B (UT to Panther Bran( NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
99 FOOT
DELINEATE
Potential Stream C (UT to Little Creek; NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
140 FOOT
DELINEATE
Potential Pond A NORTH CAROLINA
L1OW
DEPRESS
Area
1.1 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
Potential Pond B NORTH CAROLINA
L1OW
DEPRESS
Area
0.85 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
Potential Pond C NORTH CAROLINA
L1OW
DEPRESS
Area
0.4 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
Potential Pond D NORTH CAROLINA
L1OW
DEPRESS
Area
0.1 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
Potential Pond E NORTH CAROLINA
L1OW
DEPRESS
Area
0.5 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
35.635588
-78.671142
35.639063
-78.671154
35.632489
-78.673385
35.633811
-78.670498
35.632885
-78.669978
35.635539-78.671031
35.635817-78.671553
Local Waterway
REMOVED

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 07 January 2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mitchell Wimberley, 2612 N Duke St, Durham, NC 27704
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2021-02305/NCDOT/HL-00081 /Old Stage Rd SR1006/Rock Service Station Rd SIR 2736/Div5
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Garner
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.634567 Long.:-78.671323
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
■❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 07 January 2022
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): 10/27/2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Stream B
35.635588
-78.671142
99 Linear Feet
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream C
35.639063
-78.671154
140 Linear Feet
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Pond A
35.632489
-78.673385
1 .1 acres
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Pond B
35.633811
-78.670498
0.85 acres
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Pond C
35.632885
-78.669978
0.4 acres
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Pond D
35.635539
-78.671031
0.1 acres
non -wetland waters
Section 404
Pond E
35.635817
-78.671553
0.5 acres
non -wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:vicinity map, aerial map, topographic map, NRCS soil survey map, jurisdictional features map
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
■❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
■❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24000; Lake Wheeler 1998
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1970 Wake County Soil Survey
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USACE digital GIS data from NCOne Map
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth - multiple years
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Undated site photographs
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
■❑ Other information (please specify): NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11; LiDAR
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
z. Date : 2 02 2.01.07 13 :3 5: 36
-05'00'
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Mitchell C Wimberley DDat'ea202111002914'064 0 oobef'eY
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-02305 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Lake Wheeler
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner/Applicant:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Mitchell Wimberlev
NCDOT Division 5
2612 North Duke St.
Durham, North Carolina 27704
[phone]
Size (acres) 46.7 (approximately)
Nearest Waterway Little Creek
USGS HUC 03020201
Nearest Town Garner
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude:35.635798
Longitude:-78.671204
Location description: The site is located at Old Stage Road (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Road (SR 2736) to
Rolling Meadows Drive (SR 3884) in Wake County, North Carolina and is identified by NCDOT as HL-0008I (see
attached map).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. Therefore this
preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected
in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2021-02305
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
[phone] or Andrew.E.Williams2(&usace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.
D. Remarks: USACE conducted a site visit for this project on 27 October 2021.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FLOOR M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNINAUSACE.ARMY.MIL

SAW-2021-02305
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: Not Applicable.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: January 7, 2022
Date: 2022.01.07
13:52:27 -05 00
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
hllp:Hcolpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished (via email):
Heather W. Montague
Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 5
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
hwmontagu c(a)ncdot.gov

T kkie_'
ram►
"MEW,
Potential Ephemeral/
v Intermittent Stream C -
Potential Ephemeral/
Intermittent Stream C
Data Point
lir'W o%i, aritBanks Rd
2.724
vn c
Potential Pond E
or
.�• .x�, CC
Q Potential Intermitten
` Stream B Data Point
Potential Pond A
Drainage A Data Point
7
Potential Intermittent
a Stream B
�
Potential Pond D
t
Potential Pond B
s�
Existing RCP
r
Potential Pond C
_ 4P R-JI
eIC
C Ca{ to
a,
t'
FO . Q
.. ter.
0 0.09 0.18 0.27
Project Location
Miles -
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Widen Old Stage Rd. (SR 1006) from Rock Service Station Rd. (SR 2736) 10-13-21
to Rolling Meadows Dr. (SR 3884)
HL-00081
Wake County
Delineation Aerial

SAW-2021-02305
FNOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Mitchell Wimberley, NCDOT Division 5
File Number: SAW-2021-02305
Date: January 7, 2022
Attached
is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at hLtp://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/RegulatoiyProgramandPenuits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2021-02305
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Andrew Williams
CESAD-PDO
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
60 Forsyth Street, FLOOR M9
Andrew.e.williams2(&usace.army.mil
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a,USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, FLOOR M9, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]

DMS Mitigation Acceptance

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BiSER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Ms. Heather Montague
NCDOT Division 5 Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Dear Ms. Montague:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 24, 2024
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 5 Project: TIP Number HL-0008I — SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) Widening, Wake County,
WBS 49367.1.9
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on July 24, 2024, the
impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as
follows:
Neuse
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03020201
Non-
Coastal
Cp
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Zone 1
Zone 2
Riparian
Marsh
Impacts
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,974.000
5,574.000
feet/acres
*Some of the impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Buffer In -Lieu Fee (RB
ILF) fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be
provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWR's Buffer Authorization
Certification, DMS will transfer funds from the NCDOT Fund into the RB ILF. Upon completion of transfer
payment, NCDOT will have completed its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for TIP HL-0008I. Subsequently,
DMS will conduct a review of current NCDOT ILF Program Mitigation projects in the watershed to determine if
available buffer mitigation credits exist. If there are buffer mitigation credits available, then the RB ILF program will
purchase the appropriate amount of buffer mitigation credits from the NCDOT ILF program.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Mitigation Services
'®}Jl[ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NORTH CAROLINA
��.#&WFmI�� 0PWI 919.707.8976

Ms. Montague
July 24, 2024
Page Two
NCDOT TIP HL-0008I
NCDEQ — DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will
no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from NCDEQ-DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
�Gw"At-
Elizabeth Harmon
DMS NCDOT ILF Coordinator
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Mr. Rob Ridings, NCDWR
Ms. Brad Chilton, NCDOT — EAU
File: HL-0008I — Division 5
D �^ _ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NOR I H CAROLINA IP
ueparbnem W En++ MrVelowmr� /"� 919,707,8976