20240436 Ver 1_More Info Received_20240724 (3)

Kimley»>Horn
July 23, 2024
Jennifer Lawrence
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Samantha Wooten
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Pre -Construction Notification (NWP #29 and Individual 401 WQC)
Kairoi University — Modification (SAW-2024-00559, DWR #20240436)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Lawrence and Ms. Wooten:
On behalf of our client, Kairoi Properties, LLC, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed Section 404/401 Pre -
construction Notification modification request for the above -referenced project for your review pursuant to
Nationwide Permit #29 and Individual 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC). The proposed project seeks to
construct multi -family residences, totaling ±330 units, including access roads, utilities, and stormwater management
facilities. The center of the project area is located at 35.336324°,-80.741134°. The following information is included
as part of this application submittal:
• Revised Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Revised Permit Drawings
• Compensatory Mitigation
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The proposed Kairoi University project is a residential development situated on a 33.1-acre tract located in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. The proposed project seeks the development of ±330 multi -family units, as
well as associated development infrastructure appurtenances including, on -site roadway, utilities, and stormwater
facilities.
The original permit application was submitted on March 14, 2024. Design modifications are a result of comments
from the USACE, DWR, and City of Charlotte during plan review.

Kimley»>Horn
Page 2
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for stream impacts associated with culvert
installation, grading, and stream relocation.
• Stream 2 (S2)
o Impact 1: 187 linear feet (LF) of 54-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) will be installed at Stream
2. The RCP results in 120 LF/0.017 ac of permanent impacts to S2. The RCP will be buried 1-ft to
promote the passage of aquatic organisms.
o Impact 2: 96 LF/0.013 ac of permanent impacts to S2 results from the relocation of the existing
channel further south. This relocation will result in an additional 20 LF of stream. The stream
relocation will provide a wider local buffer area.
o Impact 3: 37 LF/0.003 ac of permanent impacts to S2 results from grading activities necessary to
construct the residences.
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for wetland impacts associated with grading
necessary to construct the residences.
• Impact 4: 0.19 ac to Wetland 2
• Impact 5: 0.07 ac to Wetland 3
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for open water impacts associated with grading
activities necessary to construct a stormwater management facility.
• Impact 6: 0.004 ac to Open Water 1
Overall, impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 253 LF/0.033 acre of permanent
stream impacts, 0.26 acre of permanent wetland impacts, and 0.004 acre of permanent open water impacts.
Table 1: Impact Summary between modification and original submittal
March 14, 2024 Submittal
July 15, 2024 Modification
Impact 1 — S2
172 LF/0.025 ac
Impact 1 — S2
120 LF/ 0.017 ac
Impact 2 — S2
30 LF/0.005 ac
Impact 2 — S2
96 LF/ 0.013 ac
Impact 3 — S2
18 LF/ 0.002 ac
Impact 3 — S2
37 LF/0.003 ac
Impact 4 — S2
10 LF/ 0.001 ac
-
Removed
Impact 5 — W2
0.19 ac
Impact 4 — W2
0.19 ac
Impact 6 — W3
0.07 ac
Impact 5 — W3
0.07 ac
Impact 7 — OW1
0.004 ac
Impact 6 — OW1
0.004 ac
Total stream
impacts
230 LF/0.037 ac
253 LF/0.033 ac
Total wetland
impacts
0.26
0.26
Total open water
impacts
0.004
0.004

Kimley»>Horn
Page 3
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest
extent practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide
permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by reducing the
proposed impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts include the following:
• Impact 1 — S2
o The original design included a piped culvert with multiple turns. Per a comment from the USACE,
this proposed culvert would not allow aquatic life passage. This modification reduced the turns in
the culvert, resulting in a culvert that would allow aquatic life passage. The culvert impacts reduced
from 172 LF to 120 LF.
0 96 LF of S2 will be relocated south to provide a wider local buffer area. In -stream structures (i.e.
constructed riffle, log cross -vane, and rock toe protection) will be installed in the relocated stream
channel.
• There is an existing --450 ft encapsulated/piped section of Stream 2. This modification proposes to daylight
this section of Stream 2. In -stream structures (i.e. constructed riffle, log cross -vane, and rock toe protection)
will be installed in the daylighted stream channel.
• Avoidance of the remaining 1,904 LF of streams on -site.
• Avoidance of the remaining 0.13 acre of wetlands on -site.
• Erosion control measures implemented during the construction of the site will be removed immediately
following the activities and any disturbance will be returned to pre -construction conditions.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Based on conversations with the USACE and DWR, the proposed —450 ft of daylighted Stream 2 would provide
on -site stream mitigation. Based on an NCSAM assessment of Low for perennial stream S2, mitigation is proposed
at a 1:1 ratio for impacts to this feature, or 253 stream mitigation credits.
Compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts will be met by the purchase of credits through the Upper Rocky
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. Based on an NCWAM assessment of Low for wetlands W2 and W3, mitigation is
proposed at a 1:1 ratio for impacts to these features, or 0.26 wetland mitigation credits. In total, 0.26 wetland
mitigation credits will be purchased to offset wetland impacts associated with this project. Statement of Availability
is included.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Taylor Kiker, PWS
Environmental Scientist

sratr �yo
�4 y
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. SAW-2024-00559 Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. 20240436 Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.336324
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 80.741134
Form Version 4.3, 1210412023
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 4. Z 1210412023)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * are required. The form is not considered complete until all
mandatory questions are answered.
The PCN help document may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2196924&cr=1
Page 1 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Mecklenburg Additional (if needed).
Is this an ARPA project? *
❑ Yes N No
If yes, ARPA project number:
* The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund"
(LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate
Click or tap here to enter text.
your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey
Basinger at core y. basinger(@.ncdenr.gov for further assistance.
Is this a NCDMS project? *
(Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-
❑ Yes N No
applicant)
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes N No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? *
❑ Yes N No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: *
Click to enter.
N Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted? *
N Yes ❑ No
Please provide the date of the previous submission. *
3/14/2024
N Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek
*
El Regional General Permit (RGP)
authorization?
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and
submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? *
® Yes ❑ No
NWP number(s) (list all numbers ):
29
RGP number(s) (list all numbers ):
Click to enter.
Are you a federal applicant?
❑ Yes N No
If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act
Click to enter text.
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
N Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Is this a courtesy copy notification
❑ Yes N No
Page 2 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

1e.
Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? *
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: *
❑ Yes
® No
For the record only for Corps Permit: *
❑ Yes
® No
1f.
Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? *
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
® Yes
❑ No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? *
❑ Yes
® No
1i.
Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)? *
❑ Yes
® No ❑ Unknown
1j.
Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 3 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

B. Applicant Information
1a.
Who is the primary contact? *
Taylor Kiker, PWS
1b.
Primary Contact Email: *
[e-mail]
1c.
Primary Contact Phone: * (###)###-###1#
[phone]
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? * (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner ® Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed: *
Multiple
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
Click to enter.
2c.
Contact Person (for corporations):
Click to enter.
2d.
Address *
Street Address:
Click to enter.
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Click to enter.
State/ Province/ Region:
Click to enter.
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country:
Click to enter.
2e.
Telephone Number: * (###)###-####
N/A
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2g.
Email Address: *
N/A
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name: *
Tyler Sibley
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Kairoi Properties, LLC
3c.
Address: *
Street Address:
711 Navarro Street
Address line 2:
Suite 400
City:
San Antonio
State/ Province/ Region:
Texas
Postal/ Zip Code:
78205
Country
USA
3d.
Telephone Number: * (###)###-####
[phone]
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
3f.
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Page 4 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name: *
Taylor Kiker, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c. Address: *
Street Address:
200 South Tryon St
Address line 2:
Suite 200
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28202
Country:
USA
4d. Telephone Number: * (###)###-####
[phone]
4e Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:*
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 5 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project: *
Kairoi University
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1 c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Charlotte
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
029-02-211, 029-02-212, 029-02-213, 029-02-214, 029-
02-207, 029-02-208, 029-02-209, 029-02-210, 029-02-
203, 029-02-205, 029-02-277, 029-02-206
2b.
Property size (in acres):
33.1
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
John Adams Road
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28262
Country:
USA
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point): *
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): * 35.336324
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): *-80.741134
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: *
UT to Stony Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water: *
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htmI?id=6e125ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
Yadkin-PeeDee
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located?
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030401050103
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.mai)s.arcais.com/apes/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 6 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
The proposed project is a 33-acre tract comprised of undeveloped forested land, open areas, and single-family
residences. The subject property is bound by Galloway Road and undeveloped forested land to the north, John
Adams Road and multi -family residences to the east, undeveloped forested land and W Mallard Creek Church
Road to the south, and 1-85 to the west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
SAW-2024-00559
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
DWR #20240436
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
Permits were not approved, but numbers were given. The original permit application was submitted on March 14,
2024. Design modifications are a result of comments from the USACE and City of Charlotte during plan review.
4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the completed work.
Click to enter text.
4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work
described in this application not related to the 404 or 401.
Click to enter text.
4d. Attach an 8'/2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8'/2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
0.39 acres
property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
2,157 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
0.004 acres
property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The original permit application was submitted on March 14, 2024. Design modifications are a result of comments
from the USACE, DWR, and City of Charlotte during plan review.
The purpose of this project is to construct a multi -family development for the growing local community.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed project seeks the development of ±330 multi -family units, as well as associated development
infrastructure appurtenances including, on -site roadway, utilities, and stormwater facilities.
General construction equipment including bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. will be used for
construction purposes.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area.
Click to enter text.
Page 7 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

5.
Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.
Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
Kimley-Horn delineated the site on March 22, 2022. The PJD request is included in this permit.
5b.
If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence
what type of determination was made? *
© Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
Click to enter.
Name (if known): Taylor Kiker, PWS
5c.
If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
areas?
Other: Click to enter.
5d.
List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
Click to enter.
5dl . Attach jurisdictional determinations.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Click to enter.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings
for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction
notification.
Click to enter.
7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
Click to enter.
8. Scheduling of activity:
Click to enter.
Page 8 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands ❑x Streams - tributaries
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers ❑x Open Waters
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2a1.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
2g.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Wetland
Wetland Name*
Forested?*
Jurisdiction
Impact Area
Reason/Type*
Duration*
Type*
Type*
(ac)*
Impact 4 -
Grading
Permanent
Headwater
W2
Yes
Both
0.19
W2
Forest
Impact 5 -
Grading
Permanent
Headwater
W3
Yes
Both
0.07
W3
Forest
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts
0.26 ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts
0.26 ac
2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards:
Click to enter text.
2i. Comments:
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for wetland impacts associated with grading
necessary to construct the residences. The proposed project will result in a total of 0.26 acre of permanent
impacts to wetlands.
-impact 4: 0.19 acre to Wetland 2
-impact 5: 0.07 acre to Wetland 3
Page 9 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3.
Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
3a
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
3h.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Impact Type*
Stream Name*
Stream
Jurisdiction
Stream Width
Impact length
Reason*
Duration*
Type*
Type*
(avg ft) *
(linear ft)
S2
Impact 1
Permanent
Fill (Incl.
S2
Perennial
Both
6
120
Riprap)
S2
Impact 2
Permanent
Other
S2
Perennial
Both
6
96
S2
Impact 3
Permanent
Other
S2
Perennial
Both
4
37
3i1.
Total jurisdictional ditch
Click to enter. linear ft
impact:
3i2.
Total permanent stream
253 linear ft
impacts:
36.
Total temporary stream
Click to enter. linear ft
impacts:
34.
Total stream and ditch
253 linear ft
impacts:
3j.
Comments:
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for stream impacts associated with culvert installation,
grading, and stream relocation. The proposed project will result in a total of 253 LF/0.033 acre of permanent impacts to
streams.
-Stream 2 (S2)
-Impact 1: 187 linear feet (LF) of 54-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) will be installed at Stream 2. The RCP results
in 120 LF/0.017 ac of permanent impacts to S2. The RCP will be buried 1-ft to promote the passage of aquatic
organisms.
-Impact 2: 96 LF/0.013 ac of permanent impacts to S2 results from the relocation of the existing channel further south.
This relocation will result in an additional 20 LF of stream. The stream relocation will provide a wider local buffer area.
-Impact 3: 37 LF/0.003 ac of permanent impacts to S2 results from grading activities necessary to construct the
residences.
Page 10 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
4a1.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
4f.
Site #*
Impact Reason
Impact
Waterbody Name*
Activity Type*
Waterbody
Impact area
Duration*
Type*
(ac)*
01
Impact 6
Permanent
OW1
Fill
Pond
0.004
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
0.004 ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
0.004 ac
4h.
Comments:
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP 29 for open water impacts associated with grading
activities necessary to construct a stormwater management facility. The proposed project will result in a total of
0.004 acre of permanent impacts to open waters.
-impact 6: 0.004 acre to Open Water 1
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 11 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

6.
Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian
buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
6a.
Project is in which protected basin(s)?
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Other: Click to enter.
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Site #*
Impact Type*
Impact Duration*
Stream Name*
Buffer
Zone 1 Impact*
Zone 2 Impact*
Mitigation
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
Required?*
61
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h.
Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h.
Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h.
Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i.
Comments:
Click to enter.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest
extent practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within
nationwide permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by
reducing the proposed impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts include the
following:
-impact 1 — S2
-The original design included a piped culvert with multiple turns. Per a comment from the USACE, this proposed
culvert would not allow aquatic life passage. This modification reduced the turns in the culvert, resulting in a
culvert that would allow aquatic life passage. The culvert impacts reduced from 172 LF to 120 LF.
-96 LF of S2 will be relocated south to provide a wider local buffer area. In -stream structures (i.e. constructed
riffle, log cross -vane, and rock toe protection) will be installed in the relocated stream channel.
-There is an existing —450 ft encapsulated/piped section of Stream 2. This modification proposes to daylight this
section of Stream 2. In -stream structures (i.e. constructed riffle, log cross -vane, and rock toe protection) will be
installed in the daylighted stream channel.
-Avoidance of the remaining 1,904 LF of streams on -site.
-Avoidance of the remaining 0.13 acre of wetlands on -site.
-Erosion control measures implemented during the construction of the site will be removed immediately following
the activities and any disturbance will be returned to pre -construction conditions.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Stormwater facilities are sized and positioned to minimize impacts to the greatest extents practicable. Temporary
erosion control measures, including but not limited to skimmer basins and silt fence, will be implemented to
minimize sediment laden runoff from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? * ❑x DWR ❑x Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ® Mitigation Bank
project? * (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Upper Rocky Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Riparian Wetland
Quantity 0.26
Type: Choose one
Quantity
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
Page 13 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3c. Comments:
Based on conversations with the USACE and DWR, the proposed —450 ft of daylighted Stream 2 would provide
on -site stream mitigation. Based on an NCSAM assessment of Low for perennial stream S2, mitigation is
proposed at a 1:1 ratio for impacts to this feature, or 230 stream mitigation credits.
Compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts will be met by the purchase of credits through the Upper Rocky
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. Based on an NCWAM assessment of Low for wetlands W2 and W3, mitigation is
proposed at a 1:1 ratio for impacts to these features, or 0.26 wetland mitigation credits. In total, 0.26 wetland
mitigation credits will be purchased to offset wetland impacts associated with this project. Statement of
Availability is included.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter. linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington
https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:
Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
district)
RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including mitigation credits generated.
Click to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑ No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b. If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i. Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 15 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
El Yes No
2b.
Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? *
El Yes ❑x No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state. nc.us/ncac/title°/o2015a°/`20-%20environmental%20guaIity/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003. pdf
2c.
Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
❑ Yes ❑x No
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program? *
❑ n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2d.
Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
❑x Local Government
(Check all that apply.)*
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
❑x Phase II ❑ USMP
Local Government Stormwater Programs *
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Page 16 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Charlotte
State Stormwater Programs * ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
The SMP is currently under review with the City of Charlotte.
Page 17 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes 0 No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
El Yes El No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
Click to enter.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters
❑ Yes 0 No
(15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes 0 No
downstream water quality? *
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed project.
3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR
policy. (Attach .pdf)
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? * 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
Page 18 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Wastewater generated from each lot will be collected and routed to the onsite gravity sewer system that consists
of 6" PVC piping and 4' manholes. The onsite gravity sewer systems tie into an existing sanitary sewer system
on John Adams Road that then runs parallel to the existing stream. The wastewater will be treated at the Mallard
Creek Wastewater Treatment Plan (NDPES Permit #NC0030210).
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
❑ Yes 0 No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
® Yes ❑ No
Act impacts? *
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another federal agency involved? *
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? *
❑ Yes 0 No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? *
®Yes El No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes 0 No
5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as
staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use
❑ Yes ❑ No
can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7.
Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to
NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? *
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans
5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? *
El Yes 0 No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑Yes 0 No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on February 7, 2024, did not
indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially
suitable habitat for threatened and endangered plant species on -site was surveyed. A concurrence request was
submitted to USFWS on February 16, 2024. At the time of this submittal, a response from USFWS has not been
received. A copy of the USFWS request is attached.
Page 19 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat? *
El Yes 0 No
Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity? *
El Yes 0 No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? *
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
Explain: Click to enter.
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes 0 No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? *
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on
February 7, 2024. No documented architectural or historical sites of significance within the project boundary were
identified.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8.
Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.aov/portal/search
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
❑ Yes 0 No
8b.
If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
Click to enter.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FIRM Panel 3710458800K
H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
Page 20 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: * Taylor Kiker
Signature: * J Ik - , -
Date: * 7/23/2024
Page 21 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

w
Q
0
JIL
rl
°I c
SHEE=C402
227
U I fI G # 4
225
BU G 3 222
I --
BUILDI G #42 1
BUILDING \
L L
I 85 on
GRADING NOTES:
1. REFER TO THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR NOTES PERTAINING TO PAVING, GRADING,
ACCESSIBILITY, AND STORM DRAINAGE.
2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADE CONTOURS INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1 FOOT.
3. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH FC: REPRESENTS THE FACE OF CURB AT THE GUTTER LINE. (ADD
0.50' FOR TOP OF CURB.)
4. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH TC: REPRESENTS THE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION. (SUBTRACT 0.50'
FOR PAVEMENT OR ELEVATION OF GUTTER AT CURB LINE.)
5. RIM: ELEVATIONS OF CATCH BASINS (CURB INLETS) EQUALS THE FLOW LINE OF THE GUTTER
PAN. RIM ELEVATIONS OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES, AND CLEANOUTS EQUALS THE CENTER OF
GRATE OR LID ELEVATION.
6. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH FINAL PAVEMENT.
7. MANHOLES WITHIN NON PAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE ADJACENT GRADES. UNLESS
OTHERWISE SHOWN.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND
EXISTING PAVEMENT AND STORM STRUCTURES
9. DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER FINAL GRADING, NO SURFACE WATER RUNOFF MAY BE
DIRECTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND ALL SURFACE WATER RUNOFF MUST BE ROUTED
TO APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR BE RETAINED ON SITE. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE SITE,
BOTH DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION, MUST BE FREE OF POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING
SEDIMENT, PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.
ADA COMPLIANCE:
A. CURB RAMPS ALONG PUBLIC STREETS AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED BASED ON THE CITY STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
B. PRIVATE CURB RAMPS ON THE SITE (I.E. OUTSIDE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY) SHALL
CONFORM TO THE ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN AND SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE
WARNING SURFACE THAT IS FULL WIDTH OF THE CURB RAMP, NOT INCLUDING FLARES.
C. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING ELEMENTS, RAMPS, CURB RAMPS,
STRIPING, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE
DESIGN, LATEST EDITION.
D. ANY COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT SERVING MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS IN BUILDINGS THAT
HAVE 4 OR MORE UNITS PER DWELLING SHALL ALSO CONFORM TO THE FAIR HOUSING ACT
(FHA), AND COMPLY WITH THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL BY THE US DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
E. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES (PER ADA AND FHA) EXIST TO AND FROM EVERY DOOR AND ALONG
SIDEWALKS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, ACCESS AISLES, AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. IN NO
CASE SHALL AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPE EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE
SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE EXCEED 2.0 PERCENT. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPE EXCEED 5.0 PERCENT. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0 PERCENT SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION.
F. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FIELD SLOPE MEASUREMENTS ON FINISHED SUBGRADE AND FORM
BOARDS PRIOR TO PLACING PAVEMENT TO VERIFY THAT ACCESSIBLE SLOPE REQUIREMENTS
ARE PROVIDED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ENGINEER PRIOR TO PAVING IF ANY
EXCESSIVE SLOPES ARE ENCOUNTERED. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE
ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES.
ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: CONFIRM WITH GEOTECH REPORT
THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S
BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS
DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND
WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS.
ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: RETAINING WALLS
RETAINING WALLS SHOWN SHALL BE DESIGNED AND BUILT BY THE CONTRACTOR. WALL DESIGNERS
SHALL PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SHOP DRAWING FOR ALL RETAINING WALLS. WALLS SHALL BE
DESIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS FOR RETAINING
WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE WALL DESIGNER. THE ANALYSIS SHALL INCLUDE INTERNAL,
EXTERNAL, GLOBAL STABILITY, AND BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS. THE WALL DESIGNER
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SELECTING AND SPECIFYING THE APPROPRIATE REINFORCING FILL
MATERIALS, GEOGRID, AND OTHER WALL APPURTENANCES. THE DESIGN SHALL ADDRESS
HYDROSTATIC LOADING, SEISMIC LOADING, RAPID DRAWDOWN, SURCHARGE, AND BACKSLOPES
WHERE APPROPRIATE. RETAINING WALL ENVELOPES ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND
REFLECT FINISHED GRADE AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL.
XXXX
100+1 CROSS SECTION LABELS. SEE
100+1 MEMO AND CULVERT ANALYSIS.
BUI DING #7
BUI G#6 326
32
27
—C., l* ar VP O
i
/ I
„p
Saho International Corp.
D.B. 9429 Pg. 887
Lot 2, M.B. 67-496 // I
Tax I.D. 02902204
(NOT INCLUDED)
I
o�
/'�XRQ� I
SEE SHEET C405 FOR STORM PROFILES
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ZOI
0 50 100 200 13
y
U)
Z
O
LU
0Y
O
Z
a
L N
O
N
O U Z
Z N
U
Z
morH �
� H
o o
Cj
m U o
o
m
oN C?O It
w
Z H J Z
U) LLI 2 U
O Z Y
} U z d Z
t,., >�
J O >
Y �
2
N U
O rn
C\l
o
PROGRESS
SET
Z
0Y
IY
IY
H
H
� a0
O
U p
W
N
_
p
0 N
Q N
Q
00
m
Lf)
d
C,
p
LU
C0
o
Y
LU
Z
3:
LU—
U
rn
Q
w
U
LU
12�
2
r)
0
0
U
(D
Z
W
H
a
Z
a
J
a
W
a
z
O
LL
0
a.
W
a
C
F-
Z
W
a
LU
W
O
SHEET NUMBER
C401
U
Z
LLI
H
H
0
Q
U
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Know what's below.
Call before you d

--- - - --- --
705-
90 I \ \
g g 236 I
DING \
11 696 230 BUILDING #48 I \
227 \ 238
BUILDING #47
#46 235 I \ FFE:697.
/
#45 695229 \ 232
FFE:691.83 \ \ 237 1
226 FFE:695.40
234
FFE:695.73 6g4 231 \
698e B ItbING #44
223 225 - _ �6� V v
69\ 3.00 % A V A Q
/ G/ 697 _ \
// 222 \ / A1240 - DI �\
ING #43 _ P 1.50% / \ \\\ \\ \ \ I 6°'^ I / \
220 a Al30
DIco
BUILDING #40 6g2
6131 / 219 �h BUILDING #411
20 206 205 204 203 \ N TN
210 209 1 208 \ 69
A1120 - DI BUILDING #42 213 212 211 FFE:691.22 \
214 \
\ / /,��0//////�� - \ ✓/ /// 119 - 216 215 FFE692.31 )\
218 217
6g0 \ \
695 6s5 FFE:694.26
120 �� \ y
6g \ / Impact4-W2
V / /�j/ j //�j �\ \ \ \ 697 ° FFE:697�60 Gradin
\ - A / / g V beg v
0 0.19 ac - Permanent T :690.70 .I \ / \ TW:688.57 \ TW:688.06
//�/// :687.94 BW:686.72
BW:685.56
/ /// // // / //� \ \ \� J N1 TW:69 /2.12 . \ 6g8
/ /// N1 -� D BW:689.91 U
\ / / j/`oo' // \ \ \ 118 1 BUILDING 27
_�_ BW:691.49 38
j j/j \ \ -sou6 co \ 6g� \ BUILDING #26 135 36 1 7 8I
%///// /// U 6 .
�/ 117 V \ / TW:693.49 131 132 1 3 - \
BW:692.57 BUILDING #25 129 130 FFE:687.6 - -
\ BUIL�f�1G #23 _ ( 127 1 8 /
////j/// / j///// / e A1111 -DI 1 / / 124 125 1 FFE:689.95 j \ _ 6S
/// /� / 116 RC / / 122 123 / -
- FFE:692.02 / - = A1210 - DI
666 I // / FFE:696.93 , - � A1110 DI / / I \ � R-C
/ / / / //
/// // // / // / / // I / / / 69� e ` 115 p _� A1211 - DI �05 I I I I
69g
�I///// /j ///\///�/j //j/�//// �/j///V/��//i/// i///////�/�'�///X///// / /"//i//\// �////j�j/j�/// /%//// j �///\//////�///� ////////1\�// / / / ///// als 0�/C /\ I /VA I \ \\II \/I \lI\\ I \ / \ I \I /✓\lV/A/ C�lvI/ � - -�- elS -- lti- - -- -- 11a I BUILD N #22
9
v \
6g$85
2
Uj /�113 CL
//j��- 112
/// RCP BUILDING #19 684
110109
1100-DI 00FFE:687.92�/%/�%/ gBUILDING #2FFE:695. 3 93
95 94 683
FFE:689.89 96 100 99 98
dTW:695.4FE:692.07 101
BW:691.21 105
of/�c� t \ � � _ 690 Visas - - _k k al
j
�\ / 688 TW:692.91 87,86� BW:691.17
868468 A1051-CB \
3 - 6
/ s -
/� -tl--- - --_- d - -
t oC -_- n_
/// % < \\ _ Q - _ - --�d_� \ - - -_ - =6796 A1090 DI A1061 - CB J I �I I \ \ \ ///i �` Fes' - - \ -� k - ' 677 -< - _ \ = I I \ A1040 -
/
Impact 1 - S2
-
- RCP I I
A1080 - CB
120 LF/0.017 ac - Permanent
1/
�4 24° Gip �� i6= 24" RCP - --- 1060 CB 682
- - - A1710-EX-HW / A1070 - CB \\> ° /coo'
- - T Rim:671.30'
/ I / DING #4
A-
V A� k / k k �� �A �- _ - AA BUILDI #3 7
- - -
_\\ k I k k / STg ,�jg I� \�\\ \ 3 DI \�\ I 14 15
\ chA-I
k k \ _ - _ _ A 2 y BUILDI #2 \
1� 1
V AAA\VA k k k - S�� _ _- A �, 8 9 VA E:683.61
\\ \ \ k A- \ \ / BUILDING #1 4 5 6 FF :684.89 r
\ A V 1A AV A A k k \ Q B 1 6'cP 1
\ \\ \ \ k k I \IIII / A1030 - I r CP
Ar ---
TW:683.00
k k k \ X / _ \ \ I \ S A10 CB 15" RCP
1 VA \\ k FUTURE AMENITY - -
`
V �F ��`�
\ k AREA TW:68'
/ 6 B 6 .68
1 \ k - _ \ I 1 .,R \ \ 1 AAA\\V A BW:66:
k - k- 0 k \ �/ A1082 - CB �a I BW:67
6.8
A-
3. \ I I �I' 'k k - ti• I A1os1- cs �� 1 / SSE -ZONE I
I II �o A1740 WW-large
Rim:670.40' ���_
I I 1\ \\ y �� 1994 1925 / \� �// 20' STREAM I I \ N,
k k _ CO SIDE ZONE I I A
IQ
2531
BW:662.f
691,
'00 699_ 6g8 / ;I �_� _ �\� / //�/ CONTRTOR TO TIE
/ ) \ _ - -. Ex-RO° - x�ROWrD T/ D Ex -ROVE/- - x-RO Ex- O 1630 _ - - - - - - - / -�� -PROPOSE STREAM /
D - _ =
�, ° - Etc- CONTRACTOR TO TIE � J ,ram Tf BANK TO�CISTING TP A
oo �� o� �� �o �� PROPOSED STREAM _ - - - - STREAM _
000" 60 60 00 6 ,0 0 /o / 6 /6 06o ti 557 BANK TO EXISTING-
/ / JOHN ADAMS ROAD / 1658 q� �^ o STREAM
roX. 10
a ��� /� / / / VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC ROW 9ilOn
�N/ ^�� �� / / / CDOTMAINTAINED / / / / -� \ /� -/-- In0 F61 "sm't / 1524
/ / / / / (D.B. 6l� 6/ - �A
o° / Impact 2 - S2 '/'4a 1 srg /6� 6��" / Impact 3 - S2
�o i / / / / /
Stream relocation / / /�-� '6�3 Grading \
__ _-_R = � , ; �W \ 96 LF/0_01 ac -Permanent _ \\ cub & tte �B 37 LF/ 0.003 ac -Permanent
/ -
_- -1=- - - - -
ssg
_6W7'�- / 1291 1280 68
See details on Sheet--
._- C405
1274
C�
U � �
■W\ \
W_
■
Cn
w
■Cn
W
LU
Z_
' J
L2
■ r
Q
II PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND
450
PROPOSED MAJOR
- 450 -
EXISTING MAJOR
CONTOUR
CONTOUR
451
PROPOSED MINOR
451
EXISTING MINOR
CONTOUR
CONTOUR
GB- - -
GRADE BREAK (GB)
-LOD- - -LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE
- - -HP - -
- HP - HIGH POINT (GB)
TP
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE
- - -LP - -
- LP - LOW POINT (GB)
TP:107.89
PROPOSED SPOT GRADE
- - -ME - -
- ME - MATCH EXISTING (ME)
TP:TOP OF PAVEMENT
TC:TOP OF CURB; FC:BOTTOM OF CURB
2.00%
PROP. SLOPE GRADE
FG:FINAL GRADE
ME:MATCH EXISTING
4:1
PROP. RUN:RISE
HP:HIGHT POINTTW:TOP
OF WALL
BW:BOTTOM OF WALL
FFE:FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.
100-DI; -YI 100 WI; AI 100-MH
RIM:ELEV. RIM:ELEV. RIM:ELEV.
DROP / YARD INLET WINDOW / AREA INLET MANHOLE (,'NV:ELE00-FESV.
�100-CB TW:ELEV.
RIM:ELEV. 100-HW
TC:100.50 I INV:ELEV.
6' L
FC:100.00
BW:ELEV. 6"
CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) 100-WW
ASSUMES 6" HT. FROM TOP OF HOOD CURB &GUTTER INV:ELEV.
TO FLOW LINE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
HOLD TOP OF HOOD ELEV. AND INSTALL RETAINING ASSUMES 6" HT.
PER STRUCTURE STANDARD DETAIL.
WALL FROM FC TO TIC
XXXX 100+1 CROSS SECTION LABELS. SEE
100+1 MEMO AND CULVERT ANALYSIS.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET -40
0 20 40 80
Know what's below.
Call before you d
f)
Z
O
U)
W
W
o1
Z
PROGRESS
SET
Z
W
W
W
~
~
� ep
OLLI
LULI �p
N
U)
O
11 CV
r
0
d ti
o
m
o
_
YLU
W
z
z
Q
LU
w
¢
in
0
U)
0
U
I
a
Z
a
aaa
zW0
w
°¢za
�Q
0
Z I
J
Q
>=
F
Cf)
F_
Z
-
to
ZoW
00LL
0
W
LU
>
�
Q
W
LU
Z
O
V
aw
�0
0
U
SHEET NUMBER
C402
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

II PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND 11
m0
610 --
�
1\ 4
i
0
\ \ \ \lam
r
n
v
Existing pipe dad
w'
stream centerline
z
W'
details on S
D
_
Cl)
Y
W
'
W
Cl)
n
W
'a)
Z_
c
J
=
'n
U
T
�
Q
1N
Z
1=
V)
'
N
Y
T
n
'
a
N
s
\\ \1236
654
1187
269 / 680=
BUIL / BW:676.94 / /
268 a0 6?9,
FFE:679.83
267
/ TW:677.36 /
/ W:674.17
A209 DI�
CID
'll
j170 169
:677.70 I
/ BW:671.86
/
4:0
0 - DIro
4" RC / / A2080
/ TW:678.90/���
�QZI Z BW:672.30
RW:
:679.20 672.57
Q TW:677.50
BW:670.62
I -DI
i
i
i75.00
656 ��� /
664-
1012
curb & llptter
v O
I
I
/
<<l/"
Cn
W
W
,Z�
_ — --
M—
_
�t QNw
R/w 1i A_202
450
PROPOSED MAJOR
— 450 —
EXISTING MAJOR
CONTOUR
CONTOUR
451
PROPOSED MINOR
451
EXISTING MINOR
CONTOUR
CONTOUR
GB— — —
GRADE BREAK (GB)
—LOD— — —LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE
— — —HP — —
— HP — HIGH POINT (GB)
TP
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE
— — —LP — —
— LP — LOW POINT (GB)
TP:107.89
PROPOSED SPOT GRADE
— — —ME— —
—ME— MATCH EXISTING (ME)
TP:TOP OF PAVEMENT
TC:TOP OF CURB; FC:BOTTOM OF CURB
2.00%
PROP. SLOPE GRADE
FG:FINAL GRADE
ME:MATCH EXISTING
4:1
PROP. RUN:RISE
HP:HIGHT POINT
TW:TOP OF WALL
BW:BOTTOM OF WALL
FFE:FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.
SPOT GRADE SCHEMATIC
100-DI; -YI 100-WI; -AI 7(llNV
RIM:ELEV. RIM:ELEV.
FES
DROP / YARD INLET WINDOW / AREA INLET .
MANHOLE
100-CB TW:ELEV.
RIM:ELEV. 100-HW
TC:100.50 I INV:ELEV.
6" 1
FC:100.00
BW:ELEV. F
CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) 100-WW
ASSUMES 6" HT. FROM TOP OF HOOD �1NV:ELEV.
TO FLOW LINE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CURB & GUTTER
HOLD TOP OF HOOD ELEV. AND INSTALL RETAINING ASSUMES 6" HT.
PER STRUCTURE STANDARD DETAIL. WALL FROM FC TO TC
100+1 CROSS SECTION LABELS. SEE
100+1 MEMO AND CULVERT ANALYSIS.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Z01
0 20 40 80 �J
s
Know what's below.
Call before you d
W
Q
0
to
Z
O
U)
W
W
6 I
Z
C
L N
p
N
O U 00
Z
Z N
U
Q 0
O O
to < c; U p
Q U R o
Q LL
Z N M O W
a w >- n
Z ~ W Z
W V
W Z o z
z >
J O >
Y I-
2
ZD
N O
C)
p
N
PROGRESS
SET
Z
W
W
W
~
~
ep
O
W O
N
O"t
PN
(n
r
o�_
ti
Lu
m
o
2�
W
Z
ZLu
Y
0
U
0
U
1
p
Z
Z
J
aam
W
w
Z
oQQQz
�a
�c
c
Z I
J
Q
F
F_
Z
Z
OLL
0
W
0
W
W
W
a
W
Z
O
�
a0
aW
�
O
Q
U
SHEET NUMBER
C403
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

J1L
91
ri
u
u
b
\ PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND
/ I / / / / / / /�j -- — PROPOSED MAJOR EXISTING MAJOR
/ I �• I / / / ene-C-o c .-- // j — = \ 450 CONTOUR —450— CONTOUR
L /rvco i / / // / /, �/ / — —_—_— _— _ _ �_ 451 — - 451 -
T _ _ _
PROPOSED MINOR EXISTING MINOR
// I V I I / / / / / p� / / // / / / / / — — — — — — — — _ CONTOUR CONTOUR
B L B / I \ V � 1 / cam / / / / �� / / / / / �/ / / / _ GB— — — GRADE BREAK (GB) —LOD— —LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
/ 680 / / / / / I I / �� TW:683.51 W:693.06 / / / / �� / / / I ��� — — _� — — — —HP — — — HE — HIGH POINT (GB) _TIP— FENCE TREE PROTECTION
I / _ TP:107.89
TW:680.12 / / I / / — — —LP — — — LP — LOW POINT GB PROPOSED SPOT GRADE
/ / � I I � � / / 6�6 / BW:679.43 � �, TW:703.17 — — — — � � \ �
BW:676.94 I / BW:701.38 ( )
/ / / / l I I l l l l I / —ME— — —ME— MATCH EXISTING (ME) TP:TOP OF PAVEMENT
� 6j9� / / II � I � � � I /l � I p.�4>� \ � � 1
na / � TW:690.20 \ � ° � � \ � \ � TC:TOP OF CURB; FC:BOTTOM OF CURB U)
I /
o
2.00/o FG:FINAL GRADE PROP. SLOPE GRADE ZO
r- ME:MATCH EXISTING
/ c9 299 302
\1
1 l �i 41 PROP. RUN:RISE
HP:HIGHT POINT
BMP3 BUILDING #65 TW:TOP OF WALL
(SEE SHEET TW:BW:BOTTOM OF WALL
295 BWBUILD DI
w
:67.36 1981 1 I FFE:FINISHED FLOOR ELEV. W
W7/ ITI I
N:679.20 /
N:672.57
�j
I
'
I
)❑Q ri)
M
U
\C
w
LLI
LLJ
>� _
N
W.. -
Z'
_ -7
J
Rit'�02
7 \\
�Oz 0;6
� o —
9.90 L�
\ \
7.53 —
1
TW:695.90
BW:695.06 \
SPOT GRADE SCHEMATIC
100-DI; -YI 100-WI; -AI 100-MH
RIM:ELE' RIM:ELEV. RIM:ELEV.
I
DROP /YARD INLET WINDOW / AREA INLET INV.ELE
INV:ELEV.
MANHOLE
100-CB TW:ELEV.
RIM:ELEV. 100-HW
TC:100.50 I INV:ELEV.
N6- L
FC:100.00
Bw:ELEV. 6°
CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) 100-WW
ASSUMES 6" HT. FROM TOP OF HOOD CURB &GUTTER INV:ELEV.
TO FLOW LINE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
HOLD TOP OF HOOD ELEV. AND INSTALL RETAINING ASSUMES 6" HT.
PER STRUCTURE STANDARD DETAIL. WALL FROM FC TO TC
100+1 CROSS SECTION LABELS. SEE
100+1 MEMO AND CULVERT ANALYSIS.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET -40
0 20 40 80 tJ
s
OI
Z
C
L N
0
N
O U Z
Z N
U
Z
H �
Q H
O 0
to ch Z p
Q U A o
Q LL
Z N M O W
Q W p i U5
Z ~ W Z
0 W U
O Z Y
LU Z o Z
Z >
J O >
Y I—
C\I
2
ZD
N O
OC)
0
N
PROGRESS
SET
Z
W
W
W
~
~
� OC)
O
W �p
N
O
H (V
(n
r
��
a�
o
Q
m
}
m
d
Lu
m
o
ILL
_
Y
W
Z
(2
Z
Y
U
0
u
0
0
�
Z
a
Z
a
a
U
CD
W
W
Z
QZa
�Q
0
ZI
J
Q
F
F_
Z
—Zow
Ci)
�
o
w
C/)
W
Q
a
LU
Z
O
V
aw
0
Q
U
SHEET NUMBER
C404
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Know what's below.
Call before you d

g ■
L
J
L
a■
E
1'
E
M."M
WIN
690
690
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
G
DE
685
/
685
IN
:682.83
\
680
/
680
/o
�Cq
675
X M 675
o a)
21
�p o
� CD
0)
ao �NCD'6
�CDC>(D
>
¢rnFZ
670
670
INV:66 .80 / INV:666.90
/ / /// INV:6 5.90
INV:666.80
665
665
187 LF OF 54" RCP @ 0.48% CULVERT BURIED 1'
660
660
O
M
N
co
00 O
CD
M
NO Co
00 CD
CD Ln
LO
CD
I—
O
Co
C6 (0
CO O
C6 Co
'6 C0
� NCID
1+00 2+00
1710-EX-HW TO 1740-HW
H. Scale:1 "=40' 1 V. Scale: 1 "=4'
3+00 3+50
m01
om---_
Emma
hi. V-A0-. t I
♦ N
Impact 3 -
I'
Grading
�. °�pN `� • . i • •
•• :11MIA- Ili `=
• 11 �
Existing
pipe daylighted . • newI� 1j`• •�-
stream centerline proposed. The
proposed - and
double 48" RCP is within the existing
fingerprintof • •'•
370 67(
665
665
M O
iv M LID
GRA
E
= LO
rn -z z
�
_
_
EXISTING GRADE
Lu
� � >> r
— — - - - -
-- ---- ---
660
Q
_°
660
co<
.>Lu
QU, o'?
6" PVC CR
I a ZN
- o
3 co rn
INV: 656.10
I + co m
59
I
655
Q >
I¢W-
655
I
I NV:652. 4
_
INV:651 84�
7-7
650
/ /
// / /
I INV:650.0
650
INV:649.02
645
119 LF OF
48" RCP @ .02%
645
20 LF OF 48" RCP @ 2.02%
640
640
N
p
N
OR V
6') Ln
r'-
O
O
cc
LO
COo
LO cc
LO (oo
Co
COo
o
cc
0
cc
co
co
co
co
1+00 2+00 3+00
A1750-HW TO A1790-HW
H. Scale: 1 "=40' I V. Scale: 1 "=4'
to
Z
0
w
W
61
Z
Cm
L N
O
N
O U Z
Z N
U
Z
1.6
H F--
Q H
O O
U p
Q U g ZW o
Q o LL
Z N I?W
W
Z H 1- Z
W � W (W
O Z Y
} a z
z
J O >
W-
Y I-
2
N U
O
C,
N
PROGRESS
SET
Z
0�
0�
Of
� 00
O
W O
N
P N
to
r
O
0 00
d ti
Y
Lu
J
Lu
Z
0
m
Z
�:
0
Y
U
U
W
�
Lu
2
In
0
0
U
H
W
J
U
Z I
J
Q
>=
F
Cf)
F—
Z
—
to
ZoW
013
LL
0
W
W
>
Q
a
W
W
Z
OW
a0
�
V
OC
aW
�0
�
0
U
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
SHEET NUMBER
C405

El
y �
BANKFULL
A
B
B
TOE OF SLOPE
B
FLOW
o 0
HEAD OF RIFFLE
TOE OF SLOPE
B
B
BANKFULL
A
PLAN VIEW
DISTANCE
ALONG TOE
B
POOL
EXTEND RIFFLE
ALONG TOE (TYP)
TAIL OF RIFFLE
—B
RIFFLE MATERIAL
DESIGN VARIABLES
EXAMPLE
REACH _
REACH _
RIFFLE MATERIAL 1
B, 57, E, W
— —
— —
RIFFLE DEPTH 2
12"
— —
— —
RIFFLE BOTTOM WIDTH
4'
— —
— —
DISTANCE ALONG TOE
18"
— —
— —
1 WELL MIXED GRADATION (APPROXIMATELY 70% STONE, 20% EARTH AND 10%
WOOD/MULCH) STONE MIX TO BE COMPRISED OF THE SPECIFIED MATERIALS: A =
CLASS A RIP —RAP, B = CLASS B RIP —RAP, 57 = #57 STONE E = EARTH, M =
MULCH, W = WOODY DEBRIS. 57 STONE NOT TO EXCEED 10% OF THE STONE MIX.
THE REMAINDER OF THE MIX SHALL BE EQUAL PARTS CLASS A AND CLASS B
RIP —RAP IF BOTH ARE SPECIFIED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
2 DEPTH OF 12" TYPICAL
NOTES:
RIFFLE GLIB
DEPTH I I
RIFFLE MATERIAL —
HEAD OF RIFFLE
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS FOR ELEVATION
RILE
TOP OF BANK
TAIL OF RIFFLE
SEE PLANS FOR ELEVATION
EXTEND RIFFLE ABOVE TOE OF
SLOPE EQUIVALENT TO 25%
BANKFULL DEPTH OR 0.3' MIN.
THALWEG
RIFFLE =I —
I I I— DEPTH —I I I—
- I I
TOE OF SLOPE
RIFFLE MATERIAL
/ I� RIFFLE
BOTTOM�I
WIDTH
COIR FIBER MATTING, EXTEND 1.0' BELOW TOE OF
SLOPE UNDER THE RIP RAP AND ANCHOR AT TOP
OF BANK PER MATTING DETAIL
SECTION A -A
*ENGINEER TO ADJUST AS NECESSARY, MINIMUMS CANNOT BE ADJUSTED WITHOUT CITY APPROVAL
Charlotte -Mecklenburg
SIVFA CHARLOTTE -MECKLENBURG CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
WATER STORM WATER SERVICES
GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
BACKFILL MATERIAL
NAIL ALL UPSTREAM FACES OF
LOGS WITH TYPE II FABRIC -
LOG VANE INTERSECTION
(CONTROL POINT) /
SEE PLAN AND PROFILE VANE
SHEETS FOR ELEVATION LENGTH
BANKFULL c
1/2
BASE FLOW TOE OF SLOPE
AL
4
FLOW
1/2 BASE FLOW TOE OF SLOPE
BANKFULL
B-
CUT LOGS TO MAKE FLUSH
CONNECTION. OVERLAP FABRIC -
VANE
CROSS LOG, EMBEDDED LENGTH
INTO TOE OF SLOPE J
LOG VANE
PLAN VIEW
APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING TO
BE INSTALLED PER EROSION
CONTROL MATTING DETAIL
PROPOSED GROUND—\
EROSION CONTROL MATTING TO
BE INSTALLED PER EROSION
CONTROL MATTING DETAIL
PROPOSED GROUND
_ I XI-FIF11111-111111
II-I 111 II 1I;Z__IIIII=-O
=III-III-III-III-III-�Q� I -I I -III -I I -I IIIII 11-I I I I -I I FEI I I I I I I I I- > LU
IIIIII=3"-6" ABOVE ' I -III —III —III -II 3"-6" ABOVE
BASE FLOW 1=III=III=III—IIBASE FLOW ;
HEIGHT
(RIFFLE SECTION) APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER LEVEL
"—WELL—GRADED MIX OF
RIP —RAP (SIZE PER TABLE)
—I I=III I I -III —III=
I
AND EARTH MATERIAL. MIX
I I•, I I=III-1
12" THICK'
SHALL BE AT GRADE AND
FLUSH WITH BANK
RIFFLE SECTION
NOTES:
1. ROCK TOE TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF COIR MATTING
2. LENGTH OF ROCK TOE TO BE SPECIFIED ON PLANS
HEIGHT
(POOL SECTION)
12"`THICK SWELL —GRADED MIX OF
RIP —RAP (SIZE PER TABLE)
AND EARTH MATERIAL. MIX
SHALL BE AT GRADE AND
FLUSH WITH BANK
POOL SECTION
DESIGN VARIABLES
EXAMPLE
REACH _
REACH _
ROCK TOE MATERIALI
B, E
— —
— —
HEIGHT (RIFFLE SECTION)
1.5'
— —
— —
HEIGHT (POOL SECTION)
2.0'
— —
— —
1 WELL MIXED GRADATION (APPROXIMATELY 80% STONE AND 20% EARTH. STONE MIX TO
BE COMPRISED OF THE SPECIFIED MATERIALS: A = CLASS A RIP —RAP, B = CLASS B
RIP —RAP, E = EARTH. THE REMAINDER OF THE MIX SHALL BE EQUAL PARTS CLASS A
AND CLASS B RIP —RAP IF BOTH ARE SPECIFIED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
*ENGINEER TO ADJUST AS NECESSARY, MINIMUMS CANNOT BE ADJUSTED WITHOUT CITY APPROVAL NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
C\Usero\Aorm.galley\Downloads\CMSYIS_QreenBlualopo.pq CHARLOTTE -MECKLENBURG ROCK TOE 1 OF 1
1 OF 1
STORM WATER SERVICES STD. NO. I RE`
STD. NO. REV. GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION XX.XX
XX.XX
0
CUT OFF SILL,
EMBEDDED LENGTH INTO BANK
���1�,i rll��� •
lid► �� ,�
........................... .................... ............. ...
. � -E
NOTES:
1. DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE VANE ARM TIES INTO
BANKFULL.
2. WELL GRADED MIX OF MATERIALS SHOULD BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS
BETWEEN LOGS.
3. POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE PER THE PROFILE.
4. LOGS SHALL BE 8"-12" IN DIAMETER.
CUT OFF SILL
3.0' /
1'-2' OF COMPACTED BRUSH)
COVER UPSTREAM FACES
WITH TYPE II FABRIC,
NAIL FILTER FABRIC TO
UPSTREAM FACE OF LOG
W-61e] l_1►1�
CROSS LOG -
DESIGN VARIABLES
EXAMPLE
REACH _
REACH _
BACKFILL MATERIAL
B, 57, E
- -
- -
BACKFILL DEPTH
12"
- -
- -
CUT OFF SILL, EMBEDDED LENGTH INTO BANK
4'
- -
- -
CROSS LOG, EMBEDDED LENGTH INTO TOE OF SLOPE
3'
- -
- -
VANE LENGTH
8'
- -
- -
VANE SLOPE 2
1%
- -
- -
VANE ANGLE
20°
- -
- -
HEIGHT ABOVE HEADER
0.08'
- -
- -
MAX. DROP 3
0.1'
- -
- -
1 WELL MIXED GRADATION (APPROXIMATELY 80% STONE, 20% EARTH) STONE MIX TO BE
COMPRISED OF THE SPECIFIED MATERIALS: A = CLASS A RIP -RAP B = CLASS B
RIP -RAP, 57 = #57 STONE E = EARTH. #57 STONE NOT TO EXCEED 10% OF THE
STONE MIX. THE REMAINDER OF THE MIX SHALL BE EQUAL PARTS CLASS A AND
CLASS B RIP -RAP IF BOTH ARE SPECIFIED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2 SLOPE MEASURE FROM HEADER ELEVATION OVER VANE LENGTH WHERE IT INTERSECTS
THE BANK. NOT TO EXCEED 3% (1-2% IS TYPICAL).
3 NOT TO EXCEED 0.2' BASED ON HEAD OF DOWNSTREAM GRADE CONTROL.
*ENGINEER TO ADJUST
AS NECESSARY, MINIMUMS CANNOT BE ADJUSTED
WITHOUT CITY APPROVAL NOT
TO SCALE
SHEET NUMBER
1 of 1
�/ /jSTOR1VI 9
CHARLOTTE -MECKLENBURG
LOG CROSS VANE
ATER
STORM WATER SERVICES
STD. N0.
RE`
XX. XX
Mseryr
GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS
DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
O IZ
N
0
N
U
Z
Co
N
O
U
Z
H
�
-j
0
� 0
Q
m U o
U � Z o
m
0 �
oN
Z
M
w
Z
0'
H J Z
LLJ
7) LU U
O
Z Y C)
Z
}
a-3:Z
LU
:
0
Y
tY
�
2
N
O
H
�
N
0
0
U)
o
04
PROGRESS
SET
Z
0_
0_
Of
3:
P
­3
a0
O
U p
LLI
N
_
p
—, 't
I—
2 Lo
N
Q
U)
Q
00
m
tL
0000
0
o
m
0
2
Y O
\
~
Z
Z
Y
U
cn
Q
w
rUn
0
0
U
ZI
J
Ila—
Z
00LL.
0
LU
0
t�
W
Cl)
>
Q
a
W
LU
_
Z
0
W
a
_
0
QLU
~
O
Q
U
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
SHEET NUMBER
C406

4
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
Upper Rocky Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Statement of Availability March 14, 2024
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Kimberly Browning
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Kairoi University
This document confirms that Kairoi Development, LLC (Applicant) for the Kairoi University (Project)
has expressed an interest to utilize 0.26 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the Water & Land
Solutions, LLC sponsored Upper Rocky Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 0.26 riparian wetland
credits from the Upper Rocky Site, in the Yadkin HUC 03040105. As the official Bank Sponsor, Water &
Land Solutions, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing
the proper documentation. This Reservation Sales Agreement shall terminate on August 30, 2024,
unless extended by written agreement between the Seller and Buyer, and all reserved credits will no
longer be held for the project.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 239-322-7276.
Best Regards,
Riane Welbourne
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615