770001_Sludge Removal Plan_20240417

This plan has been prepared for:
J.F. Carroll Farms LLC
Jordan Carroll
158 Carroll Farm Road
Rockingham, NC 28379
910-206-9931
Carroll
3/7/2024
This plan has been developed by:
Richmond SWCD
Matthew Reel
123 Caroline Street
Rockingham, NC 28379
910-817-3229
II
�iII iII
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with UlosursCleanout Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
'M ti 4 �0
Signal (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �=�� Lb
�
IV
Technical Specialist Signature
Date
4/12/2024

Sources in Plan
Carroll
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U 1001
Carroll Cleanout is an animal waste storage structure that is reducing the amount of sludge as
part of a cleanout plan. There are an estimated 858,643 gals in this structure prior to cleanout.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
21,728
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
21,728
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
18,107
Broadcast
18,107
Irrigated
18,107
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) '
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
18,107
18,685
(578)
886,074
(27,431)
4/12/2024 9:12:40 AM 1 / 1

Waste Storage Cleanout Source Description
Carroll
SOURCE: Carroll Cleanout
Date Measured: 10/26/2023
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 262 X 152; BOTTOM - 216 X 106; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Sludge Depth: 4.10 ft.; Sludge Volume: 827,700 gallons
Liquid Depth: 2.10 ft.; ; Liquid Volume: 529,943 gallons.
Waste Sample #: W002414
Waste Sample #: W002414
U 1001
Carroll Cleanout is an animal waste storage structure that is reducing the amount of sludge as part of a cleanout
plan. There are an estimated 858,643 gals in this structure prior to cleanout.
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Application Method
(Ibs N/1000 gals)
Source Total (Ibs)
Injected
25.34
21,728
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
25.34
21,728
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
21.11
18,107
Broadcast
21.11
18,107
Irrigated
21.11
18,107
Max. Available PAN (Ibs) `
Actual PAN Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus / Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
18,107
18,685
(578)
886,074
(27,431)
Note: In Source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
4/12/2024 9:12:52 AM 1 / 1

Planned Crops Summary
Carroll
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Wettable
Acres
SMU
LI
Crop Name
RYE
Recom-
mended
PAN
PLAT I P205 (lbs/acre)
Rating Crop
Removal Applied
��
356
JW2&3
7.33
6.9
UxB2
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.6 Tons
198
Medium
� 57
NA
356
JW6&7
20.8
17.8
UxC2
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
3.8 Tons
163
Medium
47 w J ANA
356
®
JW4&5
25.76
18.7
UxC2
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
3.8 Tons
163
Medium
47
�NA
356
JW8
19 13.6
UxC2
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
3.8 Tons
123
Medium
5
NA
369 -
®
Fall E
37.64
8.58 AcC
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4 Tons
196
Low
49
NA
385 -
1 &2
6.62
5.9
UxC2
NA
Corn, Grain
143 Bushels
107
Medium
1 63
NA
385 -
3
5.41
4.8
UXC2
NA
Corn, Grain _
143 Bushels
107
Medium
63
NA
385 - 4
16.2
12.6
ACC
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4 Tons
196
Low 1
49
NA
391 -
Mcinni
s1&2
7.54
7.1
AcC
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4Tons
1 196
Lowl
49
NA
10417 -
TysoM
68
_41F
AcC
NA
Corn, Grain
77 Bushels
54
Medium
34
NA
10417 -
Tyson2
18.1
17.5
ACC
NA
Corn, Grain
77 Bushels
54
Medium
34
NA
10428 -
Glenda
8.85
2.4
Ac6
NA
4/12/2024 9:13:48 AM 1 / 3

Planned Crops summary
Carroll
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 4.8 Tons
235
Low
59
NA
10430 -
Stutts
8.89
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay ®� 4.8 Tons
235
Low
59
NAI
10961
Good
M
14.29
8.8
CaC
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay i 3.4 Tons
170
Low
42
NA1
11060 -
(CS)
25.15
22
AcC
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
( _ 4 Tons
_ 196
Low
49
4
NA
11235
Home
(2&3)
65.71
9.6
TbB
I NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.4 Tons
211 Medium
8r NAI
11235
Home
(1&4)
65.71
10.81 MbC2
NA
1
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture �im 3.6 Tons 111 Medium 1 41 NA
I
11288
Rich?
13.6
11.6
Tb6
NA
I
Corn, Grain ( 176 Bushels
135F
Medium
77
NA
11310 -. JohnW
27.36
11.5
UxD
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
3.2 Tons
138
Medium
11417 _ Panke 61.34 9.1 CaC NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 3.4 Tons�R 170 Lowe 42 f~ NA
11541
Myrtle
42.33
18
AcB
NA
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.8 Tons 235 Low, 59
NAI
Totals:
565.63
260.88
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
I
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
None
<2
leaching below the root zone.
> = 2 & < = 10
leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone.
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
4/12/2024 9:13:48 AM 2 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
Carroll
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
4/12/2024 9:13:48 AM 3 / 3

N
�5 i
_
O
c U
O
E a)
O c
`o
N
a�O
N E
_
7
CZ 0
E C
C —
03
0— � c� O
C (Di�
O
4)
a)
O 0 U a)
°
E m
_ -0
ca O
Q a)
�co
Cofl.
ai�
c�Cc
E
m Lm
> C
a
a.
N
Q p
° O
O
U
cz 2
_O
p i
O
O C
cz
!E .V
F y
U C
3
c
cz a)
U :E
•7
N
c°a __ o
C C
y�
-C
Q
° a .2
O O
O 0 (�
Lp) R8 N
�"C••'
cn O
O
O
0) E: _
®
(d
�O U
O O O 0
C
C1 C
cz
L 9
L
U Y
U c
U (n U
o CD a)
�N
(>
p ((n) a•
N
= " � �
N •�
>+ (n O O
.O O (n
W
C 7
L 0
}�
U co C
O_ N cz
D
a)
LO � )
U) cz
N a) E
O C
+-i -° O m
U O
Q
E
cz
=
CO 0) CZ
C°
z co 1
O C
Ea)�`J
O N
j
2
m�
N
C
C
'— O)
O O
° ca 'C� 0
° 0 C
0
N i U a)
cz
co E
O C o
EE•_�
a)a)
C
a)°
co a)
O
C U>
C O
O a
O
CZ J •C
U O
nJ N CZ
-0-0 U "U
— _0
a) (n
> O O O
LO Q. U
(D E
IZ N C
a)_0a (n
E
C O
� L 0
cz a) O _0
L O
� O O_
CD-
cz
d
B
cc
C
O
w
N
d
W
N
ma�
C.
C.
0
0
0
0
Cl
0
0
0
a av_ c
0 Qa O
N�aE
a i y ^O R
co
m
T
'D
rn
to
m
m
(D
m
N
LO
CD
m
o
a1
N
CO
N
I-
D)
co
m
N
0
co
()
f-
co
m
N
co
CD
(D
J Q v 0
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a D y N
O C Q U
aC
(n
d a
(q
000
co
rn
1.1D
((°D.
(oD_
m
(�D
co
3 a)ad.
d'
M
M
N
It
V
V
tr CL Or �
` C a
M
co
co
tocn
m
0
0))
T
Cl)
cat a� Z
� za�
0
�0
Q p
0
m`
0
m
0
m`
0
mo
0
m`
0
m`
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
o
O
0
0
O
O
o
0
O
o
Q
y Tn Z
c
d N Q
rn
co
m
(O
m
n
P-
00
m
m
D)
E d 'i Q N Z
0
L ELM
U ZQ`-
C
y C a Q
p
co
0)
CO
(O
Cl)
(0
C0
N
(0
W
i`
O
I`
O
(D
D)
(D
0)
LD
i
a' N N Z
Z Z
O
O
O
O
O
O
co
O
CO0
O
0
O
O
�
co
Q a
co
Cl)
M
C7
co
a
N
Cl)
W
O
O
V
O
c
O
C
0
N
0)
()-C
C
0
C
0N
L
(D
V
00
C9
OD00
C7
M
r >
m
7
m
m
N
cz
N
co
N
cz
2
2
2
2
2
2
d
(n
In
U)
!a
a
75
-0
�
a
:
a
-0
m
a
=$
a
Ca
E
E
E
E
E
c
c
E
=3
E
c
-0
-0
N
a
a
_0
.O
T
2
T
2
T
2
N
T (C
Sa_ I
.O
T
S
O
O
I U
C
O
U
SJ
T
S
.O
T
2
C
O
U
0
0
(A
O
r-
o
m
o
cD
co
Ln
o
rn
O
CR
o
(D
0
o
o
0
(D
co
r
C7
co
Ln
It
N
I`
L
�a
d
mC7
�
W
O
((D
(ND•
7
N
LLq
O
ir
N
N
CA
CD
LD
CD
I�
(OD
m
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
N
DD
Z)
D
Q
D
D
Q
Q
QU
N
U
(n
=
62
N
�m
'd'
�LD
(D
�Il
O
W
—
N
KS
C7
7
= —
U �N
(On r
TC
M
'�
LL
C
`
(D
Cl)
(D
co
to
(D
Cam)
D)
LD
LD
LD
m
O
F
C(D•)
co
co
CO)
Ln
0
ct
CD
N
0
a
v

Ril
0
L
cc
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
7
d'
�
'
OD
cD
O
Cl)
N
N
m
CO
cD
co
c0
cD
n
O
<Y
cD
m
V
LO
m
N
O
00
N
ODn
7
m
n
m
O
m
O
O
o
m
CO
m
Go
N
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
O
O
NU)
N
N
N
N
C
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
LA
0
G
(
U
O
O
CDO
O
O
O
O
O
—
Q
a
Q
U
O
a
O
O
cd
m
O
V7
m
UO
co
O
7
cD
cn
co
N
O
N
N
n
N
m
O
a)
tfi
LO
LO
It
C\j
LO
co
co
O
O_
N
Z)
O
c6
O
~
6
O
Q
O
m
~
co
00
Ln
CO
00
01
t0
LO
cD
O
co
cD
0
c0
Lo
co
aD
O
F
c0
c6
cz
co
ca
m
C5
co
ca
co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m I
m
co
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
n
Lo
CO
co
M
Ln
LO
Lo
O
n
co
M
cD
Lo
m
n
LO
m
n
m
o
n
D
rn
T
_
M
m
M
m
0
T
LO
m
N
N
N
N
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
07
T
T
O]
m
T
O
T
T
O)
Cl)
n
co
Cl)
co
co
N
T
c+7
co
y
C
H
O
C
N
C
O
0
In
C
C
F
O
In
C
C
C
F
c0
CO
V
m
cD
m
d'
cD
r O
m
N
m
m
of
v
c6
2
N
2
y
co
2
U
N
2
N
U
N
N
S
N
IT6
2
O
co
2
co
O
N E
N
2
N
N
[N`0
N
O
cL6
N
OD
m
m
co
co
m
m
m
m
c
m
m
m
m
m
a)
m
cli
m
m
m
.o
.fl in
-0 in
O
s
2
2
2
S
20-
20.
U
2
2
2
Cl
0
cD
0
co
0
o
0
m
0
fl
00
O
0
0
o
N
N
co
N
N
O
O
O
W
u7
c0
d)
CO
d)
N
cO
n
n
CD
cD
co
m
d'
m
m
m
Co
W
4
LO
N
ui
cD
to
cD
m
n
N
cD
N
m
m
N
U
9
x
co
m
Q
c6
U
U
Q
SJ
F
.O
F
Z
U
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
-O
E:
N (6
cn
7
-O
0
cn
O O U
N d.
ot$
N
oZ$
n
U
C
O
Y
N O
O
T
C7
U)
C7
x
2
2 N
2
a_
OD
O
,
o
Cl)
O
O
o
m
LO
00
o_
co'IT
n
V
d
c0
a
0
3
0
ai
r
0
a
N
O
O
N
C
Q)
E
O
Q
E
T
N
C
E
0
U
U
N
L
C

4/12/2024
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Cleanout Only
J.F. Carroll Farm LLC
Narrative
This plan was designed for J.F. Carrot Farms, a 4,770 head gilt swine facility in Richmond County
and is to address the reduction of sludge in lagoon 2 on the farm. A sludge survey and volume
estimations were completed by Anthony Growe, Richmond County Cooperative Extension, and
waste samples of the liquid and sludge were completed by Michael Shepherd with Division of Soil
and Water Conservation (DSWC). The survey indicated there is an estimated volume of 529,943
gallons of liquid and 827,700 gallons of sludge totaling 1,357,643 combined gallons in the lagoon.
Due to available land for application and program funding, the cleanout plan was developed to
address 858,643 gallons of slurry waste. This sludge cleanout plan was developed for an
Agriculture Cost Share Program (ACSP) contract by Matthew Reel, Richmond County Soil and Water
Conservation District. The Technical Specialist (Michael Shepherd) should be notified of when work
is to begin and the estimated completion time.
Rates have been adjusted in this plan to meet ACSP BMP policies to keep phosphorus applications
at lower rates. Commercial nitrogen fertilizer will need to be used to receive the maximum yield
potential of the receiving crop. When reading this plan, special attention should be paid to the
header columns. The column to be used should say "Manure PA Nutrient Applied lbs./acre". There
is also a column which reads "Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied lbs./acre" which give the commercial
nitrogen fertilizer poundage to be added for maximum available nutrients.
Methodology for sludge removal is as follows:
1. Entire lagoon should be agitated to a slurry consistency.
2. Honey wagons should be used to haul and spread waste to appropriate fields and spread based
on the plan application rates.
An updated slurry sample is required to be taken once the lagoon has been fully agitated to meet
permit rules. The nitrogen estimation from the slurry sample will be used in filling out all SLUR
forms.
During the sludge removal process, special attention should be paid to not harming the dike wall of
the lagoon.
All landowners receiving sludge should read and sign the "Sludge Potential Impacts on Site" form.
The following setbacks for waste application fields are as follows:
• 75-foot distance to a perennial stream/river other than an irrigation ditch or canal
• 75-foot distance to a residential property boundary
• 200' from dwelling not owned by producer.
• 1 00'from a well
• 25from drainage ditches

�7
0mQ
.
O C
OO
O
O
m
0
r�
0
O
rL
aa— ...
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Oa
d o i
O
co
O
o
0')
OR
It
rn
I-
Iq
CO
cq
CO
cq
dt
(q
m
CO
(q
CA
Lq
O
Ln
Cl)
o
d U
3
d'
M
Cl)
N
Lf)
LO
d'
p C a0 a
Q r II1
z a a
_
O '
C Q y Z
a
CA
CA
N
M
N
00
N
CO
00
CA
LO
M
LO
M
00
CA
00
CA
LO
M
M
to
00
R a a'°
Qv
z O, Q
Z
00
M
CO
M
CO
M
N
Cfl
CA
L\
O
C`
O
CO
O)
CD
Cfl
LO
M
LO
M
O
f�
d 0 �y
cc :2
N
N
M
�j O
N
CO
U)
000
fn
03
(n
CO
m
c0
VJ
(0
O
fn
coc0
Ul
U1
Mc0
t
VJ
03
a -
U
-o
U
70
U
_0
U
-0
U
-o
U
_0
U
'0
U
-o
U
-0
U
-a
U
a
U
-o
U
_0
CL °)
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
m
m
m
in
in
m
m
a= 0
0
10
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a•i
—C\0
\C\0
rC\rJ
�M
(jQa
MO
MO
chm
Mm
MO
aC0
aC0
MO
MO
NCO
MO
MO
CO
uj
co
C
Cn
C
Cn
C
en
C
C
CU
(U
C
C
(U
cn
C
co
C
W
C
i
H
H
CD
OR
CO
0D
r
m
r 7
CO
'�
C
m
N
00
Cl)
co
co
�t
M
co
al
co
e
co
co
N
cl
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
C
CLOO
N
N
O
O
N
LY00
O
N
Cad
U
IZ
N
�
CZ
c(a
CZ(Z
CO
co
-oo
ao
-ate
a�
-o�-ate
:o�
n E
E
E
fl E
E
E
c
L=
-0 E
E
E
>N
Sm
>+ �
2m
>� CU
2m
>+ N CIS
2md
>, (U
2m
O
U
O
U
>, N
2m
.o
>. (U
MM
O
U
>, CU
2m
>+ N
2m
>+ N
2m
=0
=o
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
-= CC
CD
a
a)
a)0
-D
_1
a
N
0
J
J
a
0
J
J
J
IL
2
2
2
CD
n m
R L
r
0
0
LO
rn
co
CO
.-
_
v
m
m
� V
6
M
-
M
06
LO
�
N
V
N
N
M
�r
+�+
co Cr)
r
O
O
CNO
LSO
Cn
co
00 00
0
LON
CV
(.6
LO
co
f�
(D
06
00
m
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ao
m
U
N
Q
D
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
U
d
�p
�—
0
o
0
0
00
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ch
r
�O
tl
>
>
>
codf
M
�F
�
N
N
>
LL
H
(3
0
•+
C1
Cp
(0
CO
CO
0)
LO
LO
tO
N
CO'M
O
i
LO
M
LO
co
LO
M
LO
M
CO
co
00
co
00
M
00
co
co
O
0
It
O
CO
O

N
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO
CID
O
N
N
O
LOA
It
N
LO
C7
Cl)
V
Ln
rn
LO
(D
10
00
Cfl
O
Ln
M
co
M
O
Ln
N
N
m
ca
cz
co
cz
cz
co
U
U
U
U
U
cz
cz
m
co
ca
m
cz
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
o
r M
O
r C�fJ
o
r C�7
o
Ln C�
O
coo
o
M
0
co
m0
C'7m
Mm
NO
CCO0
Mm
MO
U
C
C
N
C
C
C
0
�
�
CO
'-
N
It
M
M
(D
m
M
M
4
co
co
cz
cz
2
2
2
2
y
U
U
En
U
En
19
�
O
�[5N15
ca
N
c
N
co
cz
'a
o
76 a)
L a
�o 0)
-a a =
(,�
'a
a :3
a
am
.a
15
Q E D
c
� E
o f
� E
>+ N
1:m
>+ N cz
=m0-
>+ 41 c6
2En0-
O
U
>. N
mm
>+ N
200
>+ O
a: co
7
�2
7
O
3:
J
N
N
�
N
J
3
N
oq
C4
CO
Lq
M
N
O
m
r
I�
O
C`Oo
M
Cl)
N
CEO
CO
M
N
N
Q
19
Imo—
U
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
OU
O°�
ON
....
L
.0
O
>'
(S7
M
Ln
M
N
M
O
f�
d
O
N
N
N
M
V
t10
�
�
N
S
T
O
CO
O
M
cn
0
(4
co
O
m
coo
N
L
L
U
ai -a
CZ Q c
n 'c�
> Q E
Q 0)
N
E a)
O E
O > :3
N U
i N
:3 O
O U U
X
W

O
i
Al
a)
a) Q (n
�Eo(ni
U U
0o�X
L
0 a) L
O U
co
L •� p O
~ "= ._ n
_c cca.
C
O M-cm6)E�E
M _ Tcrj
fl U) a)
U
O�
C � a)
W a a)
a) cd Q O
7 a= o0
m .� ro Lo
U m Co a) a
= MC U
O > O O
(n''O C.) -0
()Oi6 N
O L ce)
C C
cd — V U) M
m
Ea)aW
:3N.0
u)���E
(n N �
O (D �_ N C
a) > N
> X -0.0
ma)� c
cz
L O •a)
= O 0 a) z/1
U7 r U)
O C O �y
Q 0— LL_
v NZ
C U � � yL-.
ca.E()�O
co�a)N
.o �
�nEQo.
O u) O N
o X
O U (q
C C O
a
OU 0- U C
LEco
� = 0)
L E C
_X a) (�
m E O'er Q
C 0) (Z ❑.
o a) (a E o
U>_ a)
N f> N Q 7
O U) > 0 .—
a)cr.oX
0 O ca O M
O m a)) OO O
C N rLL
O �o Uo V vi
O
M O M>
J n. :5 N
C
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(DN
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Z
co
M
T
C6
O
4
CA
N
r,
N
r
N
�
N
N
L6
CD
-a iO
O
O
(.000
co
CC)
M
O
M
a)
M 1
=
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NU) —
�
r
r
LO
M
of
ri
Cl)
_
W O
00
r
r
m
CCo
v
v
coo
M
cMi
cn
C Q
r
M
M
N
N
N
r-
N
N
N
d0•
7 C
dam•
O
C°
M
M
(MO
CD
M
M
(MO
U a
r
(O
O
N
N
r
r-
N
M
M
Cl)
Cl)
(f)
O
O
O
Lo
00
a+
W
N
O
N
O
co
In
LO
N
co
LLO
O
LO
M
F�
C
- N
O
o
0
0
N
o
�
o
dN
m
cNo
cNo
N
rl-
Q
cn
M Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
cc
C
N
�
N
V
N
�
N
�
N
d
N
d'
N
d•
N
d•
N
d'
N
d'
N
co
co
co
co
N
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
Q
M
M
M
M
W
M
M
M
M
M
3
0
0
CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v u)
r
r
r
r
r
o
o
r
r
o
d
aM
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q V
a5
d
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
L❑
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
r
—
O
cn
M
C13
W
cu
co
_
_
=
a
M
_
_
U)
U)
U)
(n
w
U)
(n
M
a)
0
a)
a)
a)
6
6
-0
-0
-0
a
a
a
U
-`°a
:3
:3
:3
:3
=5
:3
E
E
E
E
E
c
E
E
c
0m
M
m
M
M
M
m
a
-a
a
a
a
a
a
-0
-0
_o
a
a
E
2
2
2
2
2
U
U
S
=
U
N
M
N
It
It
N
N
N
0
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
Nr
Och
ONNN0
V
rN
M
N
N
M
M
N
V
N
N
N
(h
R
N
co
N
0
0
X
X
X
rn
N
Y
0)
Y
m
r
M
coo
coO
M
M
z
m
Cl)
m
Cl)
�
0)
O
O
N
N
W
M
M
W
06
cz
c,6
M
w
N
C a3
O
0.S
M
LL
co
(o
(o
co
rn
(O
(O
LO
i
M
M
M
M
MM
O
H
CY)
Co
CM
M
V
P.
r
m
V
N
O
a
V

R
a
M
M
N
O
N
a

o
Co
o
o
oOD
00
O
r
Cl)
N
CO
M
M
CY)
co
00
p0O0
p
O
O
O
O
M
00
00
r
N
N
L(7
lfl
CA
6
00
N
M
co
CO
CD
r
OD
r
m
co
LO
�t
r
o
It
�
LO
v
LO
N
N
N
((D
r-
OD
LO
(D
Cl)
r
r
O
r
r
V
T
O
O
r
N
coN
OODD
CND
�
r
LO
Lf')
(ND
ONO
CO
M
LO
It
LO
It
W
Cl)
M
LO
Lo
V
LC]
N
00
N
(D
L"
N
M
p
r
00
Cl)
LO
r
NV
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
(rD
O
rY
O
V'
Cl
lzt
O
Ill:
O
V
O
Id:
O
't
O
'1:
O
113:
O
V'
O
"t
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
li
N
N
N
�
�
�
'Nd'
�
dN'
li
�
It
ll'
Cl)
O
M
O
co
O
Cl)
a1
Cl)
O)
Cl)
D)
co
O
M
O
(`!
O
Cl)
O
M
m
C7
00
M
00
CO
M
C0
00
co
M
C0
N
Cl)
M
co
00
I)
00
Cl)
co
co
00
O
(D
CD
(D
(D
(D
(D
(D
(D
O
(D
(D
O
N
N
CV
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
Qi
m
co
co
co
cz
cz
cz
C>e
2
2
S
2
d
d
2
=
2
(n
(n
fn
cn
U)
(n
(n
T
(n
E
(SS
m
(SS
(0
(0
(o
m
(O
cz
�
?
a
�
E
E
E
E
E
E
c
E
E
E
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
U
2
S
2
2
S
2
U
2
2
2
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
V
Z�
N
N
lf)
a
N
V
r
00
N
N
zz N
\
\
a
\
\
N
N
T
00
00
00
00
>
O
O
0
01
LO
W
O
O
O
00
N
N
r
ON
OO
N
N
O
O
NmNWN
(D
r
L0
J
(n
J
(n
O
a)
N
(n
Cn
a)O
d)
co
M
00
00
O
c6
oT3
(On
(DC
cA
O
C7
U
0-`
O
S
O
S `
U
[C
.0
cO
d
>'
2
r
ao
N
0
M
(D
o
CD
LO
CO
LO
CO
00
CO
o
r
V
d'
V
CA
O
N
N
N
M
V
O
O
O
O
O
A
O
O
O
.0
0)
E
cz
U
cz
f�l
7
E
X
C�
E
U
O
Q
cz
(n
a
a�
N
E
x
(1)
c
O
N
C
O
U
.Q
O_
0
O
O_
O7
ca
or
m
a�
I—

m
N
O
N
a
cz
0
N
c0
E
7
E
z
E
a
U
O
O
0—
a)
L
C
cil
L_
U
N
O

Carroll
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop
based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes, these
recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are maintained.
Tract ID
Field ID
Crop(s)
pH
Lime Recom.
for Crop(s)
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper
Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc
Recommendation
356
JW6&7
4.8
0,0
85
0,0
63
0,0
356
JW2&3
4.8
0,0
100
0,0
253
0,0
356
JW4&5
4.8
0,0
100
0,0
253
0,0
356
JW8
5.5
0,0
145
0,0
193
0,0
369
Fall E
3.8
0,0
110
0,0
35
0,0
385
1 &2
6.4
0,0
162
0,0
550
0,0
385
3
6.4
0,0
162
0,0
550
0,0
385
4
6.4
0,0
162
0,0
550
0,0
391
McInnis
1&2
5.8
0,0
220
0,0
235
0,0
10417
Tysonl
5.3
0,0
70
0,0
88
0,0
10417
Tyson2
5.3
0,0
70
0,0
88
0,0
10428
Glenda
5.6
0,0
431
0,0
445
0,0
10430
Stutts
5.6
0,0
431
0,0
445
0,0
10961
Good M
6.1
0,0
38
0,0
139
0,0
11060
House
(CS)
5.3
0,0
75
0,0
153
0,0
11235
Home
(1 &4)
5.6
0,0
431
0,0
445
0,0
11235
Home
(2&3)
5.6
0,0
431
0,0
445
0, 0
11288
Rich7
5.9
0,0
240
0,0
265
0,0
11310
JohnW
5.9
0,0
672
0,0
1248
0,0
11417
Panke
4.9
0,0
220
0,0
306
0,0
11541
Myrtle
6.3
0,0
200
0,0
2 55
0,0
4/12/2024 9:14:51 AM 1 / 2

Carroll
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
Cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
4/12/2024 9:14:51 AM 2 / 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
ii. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
i9. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

2o. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

gNRCS
United States
Department of Agriculture NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Natural Resources Conservation Service
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for: CGt rro f-a r M S L L e-
By: 10aAcw 2ec(
Farm: 3 s 8 3 Tract(s): 11311
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more `traditional'
Dater
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncaqr.gov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
http.-Ilnutrients.soil.ncsu.edulindex.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
httpJ/www. ncagr. gov/SWC/tech/1217committee. ht
m/
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SIB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a Feld -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P `drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index.php
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
Phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiencv fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where `chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5