830010_routine_20240718

l ype Vl v tsll: _.ompuance inspecuon v operation Keview U structure uvaivation U I ecnnical assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 Arrival Time: ',Wf-- Departure Time: �',� County: (P( d
Farm Name: M YET , Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Region: f
Facility Contact: .y �� � � Title: V �Kc Phone:
Onsite Representative: `� N 1 1Integrator:
Certified Operator: 1.1j� � �i Certification Number: l oo-b q
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current =
_
Deslgn "Current
Design , Current
" Swine Capacity ` k'op
Wet Poultry =
Capaciy °Pop '
Cattle
Cap€ac�ty ` 1Pop
a
Wean to Finish
Layer::
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
=
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
`,
-Dry-,Poultr °
''Caiiaciiv Pop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
° 0ther
Turkey Poults
n
Other
==
g
s
�o
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
NNo
El NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 2
Observed Freeboard (in): r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes "M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) v
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NZ
Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
V �
12. Crop Type(s): C� �" eye
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes `e ] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
f�
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? f l ail ► l�
KI Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[q No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
(� No
`�
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
nV No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check lc�l Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [!q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes n, Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
v
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ` t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer.to question #):,Explain any YES answers'and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawin s of facili to beite m a
g r explain situations (use ad_tlitionaI pages as necessary).
"
arm remov?d S►upe flue Iggoon�
-. iggaon -,3 v q or-ec�s nQ-ed wow. bUf- c�
o�Kfi-� -s �e b �� a.�-��Is oUe�all
-ro the F-O hfi of dh'vewa4 needs
ii) � has been of- I lYlplz����Y1��J-
O� nr��d No l�mpiz�ve
uv i 11 b2 OS V'2d N42/Vf i� l job or
t 'ewd
1P-p,
CallbfC"i��
4"d
' 'NM 11
VgSI,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ! 1 "1 " fly' �11
Date:
511212020