820626_Routine_20240620

Division of Water Resources T.
Facility 1�Iumber O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O
Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �b Region:
Farm Name: iO y I Im �Nt Ne W Owner Email:
Owner Name: _Me I -� Th o rtON Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: c Vy tl S 6G r oU t C K Title:_F S 1 PC,, Phone:
OnsiteRepresentative: Wme Integrator: VI\O ��
Certified Operator: �h�l N d a `� C, Certification Number: C f
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design ``Current
'
,
Design Current "
Design Current
Swine°
Ca aci
-
pa
- P.
Wet Poultr
, y
Ca aci
P° t3
Po
Cattle
Ca aci Eo
P . t3' P
'
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Ii (7
j
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean?`-
.
Design .,
Current`
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D Poult ,
_° u .. ry
Ca aci
p ty
s' Pop.,,'',
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
. Other=mot°
.....:_°
Turkey Poults
FT
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E ] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
gj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - 02,W jDate of Inspection: —14 Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes LNo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 7M No
IV
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
Structure 1 Structure 2
1
ND
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ONE
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
R
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
7�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cj�) W� � S W -
13. Soil Type(s): noUV 4—i., w a� �I rn, 61 a I ' l )I V . NoCfol L<
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes [ No
❑ Yes �] No
❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: ZE-UU2 I Date of Inspection: —
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes bi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [—]Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
rZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
KI
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains.exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
F0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
K) No
❑ NA ❑ NE
V uq-e d
�Iv�g� Suh/�J
w ast� to 3 23
4- fv- 23
I2- 1�-epD
�- Cp - 21
-I 12TI-N '661
UDt OVe,I- pqN
R"I N eoI I
C011bv-011-foN 3 Soi I 4u-e b� IZ�31.2q
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �bn LVZ 1-th of Phone:9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: K 07xz IM a Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020