820352_routine_20240620

'9VPW�ision of�Vater Resources z
,� �•
AM Number
Y a ® ® Division of'Soil and`9Vater;Conservation `
0 Other Agency
Cype of Visit: 19Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: - Arrival Time: Departure Time: . y County: �NT Region: _
Farm Name: "V I�, Q C h� �I uj I I ? pj Owner Email:
Owner Name: A C7 VIDbI N�1)N Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: c )C 3�S �bn 1 W l ('K Title: .yec . Phone:
OnsiteRepresentative: SO ME Integrator•
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
10-3-01
9'6e aoG
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
:E,>s Design Current _ _ Design ,Current- LL° Design ;Current 3.
Svuine Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity .Pop Cattle Capacity Pop
-
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other k` ,�
Layer
Non -Layer
-Des gn ,Current°
Dryon try:- CapaciPo
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy'Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No (�] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
rn No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
J n
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C9 _ 0` CUUS R
13. Soil Type(s): fil Iffi o W O Y)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes 4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [:]Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: - -
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? -t 6 6m VP
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes a] No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes q] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0, No
❑ Yes i;o
o
XUJ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES, answers;And/or any additional recominenda#ions or any other camments.~: f
Use'drawings�of acility-tobetter explain situations (use additional pages as. necessary).
1�2U�2Wed CC�IIk�IC���DI �I jj'-I ��L 1�,C(J 0j C'l�'C�Ci
,, ���-.23� Nc�{- ov�l�
PaN, Soo ancq,;(i clue �j �� ai � ,
~,. �agben N�edS eR,o�ioN 'VW'Qql'�- b� d�c ao�� ���. du�� �►ll
�oti�bVr1 gyp. Laq nbh 100K� -RW,,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �Q 1 4t { o h UF Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: KW laI gI It Date: LU L
Page 3 of 3 511212020