20051771 Ver 1_401 Application_20050919

_ ~~
. EWELL
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, PC
14 September 2005
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attention: Ms. Andrea Wade
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Package
Proposed Stormwater Wetland in Courtland Park
Reidsville, North Carolina -Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Wade and others To Whom This May Concern:
20051771

JEWELL Engineering Consultants, PC is hereby submitting the PCN Application form and associated attachments
for the proposed Courtland Park Stormwater Wetland project in Reidsville, North Carolina. JEWELL has been
retained by the Piedmont Triad Council of Governments (PTCOG) to lead the analysis, design, and 404/401
permitting coordination for the proposed stormwater wetland project.
Based on a site meeting on 8/10704 that included Andrea Wade from the Raleigh Corps Office, Darryl Lamb from
the Winston-Salem DWQ Office, and Doug Jewell from JEWELL Engineering; JEWELL was advised that the
proposed wetland project would satisfy the requirements of NWP 18 and that. formal written concurrence from the
NC Division of Water Quality would not be required. One copy of the PCN is hereby being submitted to the Corps
and two copies are being submitted to the DWQ.
Please find the following included within this PCN Application Package:
1. Agent Authorization Letter_from PTCOG (1 page)
2. Completed PCN application form (9 pages)
3. Figure 1 - USGS quad map showing proposed project site and vicinity (1 page)
4. Figure 2 -Soil survey map from Rockingham County SCS (now NRCS) (1 page)
5. Figure 3 -Map showing aerial photo of city park site and property boundaries (1 page)
6. Figure 4 -Site plan for proposed Stormwater wetland, for permitting review purposes only, not released for
construction (1 page)
Thank you for your assistance with this project. Should you have any questions, require further information, or
have other direction please contact Scott Bryant with JEWELL Engineering at Tel [phone] ext. 3.
Sincerely,
JEWELL Engineering Consultants, PC
~%CJ~/Y
Scott D. Bryant, PE
cc: ~1C Division of Water Quality - 401 Wetlands Unit
Carol Patrick, Piedmont Triad Council of Governments
,,'`~~u~uiur~~~ ~~
C '
~~` ~ ~OFESS/0~9~9 '~;
Q ~;
SEAL 1
21573
,;
N ~ r~ ;',`
•,~~ p NGtNE~:~ • ~
'`
'~. s ~. 6Q' ``,..
145'Et~t->E~"~
Post Office Box 2294, Kernersville, NC 27285-2294 ^ 311 South Main Street, Suite A, Kernersville, NC 27284
[phone] ^ Fax [phone] ^ www.jewellengr.com

PIEDMONT TRIAD COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Wilmington Building, Suite 201
2216 W. Meadowview Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27407-3480
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
www.ptcog.org
September 7, 2005
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Agent Authorization Letter
Proposed Stormwater Wetland in Courtland Park
Reidsville, North Carolina -Rockingham County
Dear Ms. Wade and others To Whom This May Concern:
Randall L. Billings, Executive Director
This letter is to authorize JEWELL Engineering Consultants, PC to serve as agent for the Piedmont
Triad Council of Governments (PTCOG) in required Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to the US
Army Corps of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality for the above referenced Stormwater wetland
project. The project is being managed by PTCOG under an EPA 319 grant. PTCOG has hired JEWELL
Engineering to serve as the prime engineering consultant for this project, along with technical support
from NC State University in Raleigh. The City of Reidsville is also a key partner in this project and will
assume maintenance responsibility for the wetland upon completion as it will be located within their park.
JEWELL Engineering Consultants is also hereby submitting the PCN form for this proposed wetland
project to comply under the Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18. Based on a site meeting
on 8/10/04 that included Andrea Wade from the Raleigh Corps Office, Darryl Lamb from the Winston-
Salem DWQ Office, and Doug Jewell from JEWELL Engineering, JEWELL was advised that the
proposed project would satisfy the requirements of NWP 18 and that formal written concurrence from the
NC Division of Water Quality would not be required. One copy of the PCN is hereby being submitted to
the Corps and two copies are being submitted to the DWQ.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. Should you have any questions, require further
information, or have other direction please contact Scott Bryant with JEWELL Engineering Consultants
at Tel [phone] ext. 3.
Sincerely,
~~~ .
Carol Patrick
Water Resources Project Manager
Piedmont Triad Council of Governments
cc: / NC Division of Water Quality
JEWELL Engineering Consultants, PC

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
2005~~7~
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^ K ~ A
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), checl~.h~e: ^ ~!~
IL Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Carol Patrick, Water Resources Mana eg r ~~<
Mailing Address: Piedmont Triad Council of Governments (PTCOG)
2216 W. Meadowview Road
Greensboro. North Carolina 27407-3480
Telephone Number: 336-294-4950 Fax Number: 336-632-0457
E-mail Address: cpatrick(a~ptcog.org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Bryant PE
Company Affiliation: JEWELL En~ineerin~ Consultants PC
Mailing Address: PO Box 2294
Kernersville North Carolina 27285-2294
Telephone Number: 336-996-9974 ext. 3 Fax Number: 336-996-9976
E-mail Address: sbryant(a~jewellen~r.com
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Courtland Park Stormwater Wetland -Reidsville, NC
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Park owned by City of Reidsville
4. Location
County: Rockingham County Nearest Town: Reidsville, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Courtland Park - City of Reidsville Park
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Courtland Park is located
west of Crescent Drive and south of Courtland Avenue in Reidsville, NC Rockingham
County)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36 °20'46.023 N 79° 40'30.723W
6. Property size (acres): The City-owned Courtland Park is approximately 3 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Little Troublesome
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Park land owned and operated by the City of Reidsville.
Within vicinity of project is mainly established residential land use.
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Proposed project is to construct atwo-stage stormwater wetland within the public nark to
help capture and treat stormwater runoff pollutants from the developed 70-acre Reidsville
watershed. Project goal is to help improve water quality for the downstream receiving Little
Troublesome Creek, which has been identified as impaired for fecal coliform bacteria.
Project is supported and funded by an EPA 319 grant administered by NC DWQ. PTCOG in
Greensboro is the project manager and facilitator. PTCOG has hired JEWELL Engineering
and NC State University to design the proposed wetland for the park. Standard earth ading
and soil compaction equipment as required will be used to construct the project following
installation of approved erosion and sediment control measures. Project features include two
earthen embankments to create the two-stage wetland and as well as riser-barrel
spillways/wetland water control features, rock-lined overflow spillway channels and enemy
dissipators, along with appropriate wetlandplantin s.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: As a fitting urban stormwater management
control to help capture and treat urban non-point source pollutants from the developed 70-
acre watershed. This stormwater management retrofit project is intended to help improve the
quality of runoff waters entering the downstream impaired Little Troublesome Creek.
Educational opportunities will also be afforded by having the constructed wetland within a
public park setting in Reidsville. The City of Reidsville will operate and maintain the
stormwater wetland upon construction completion. The City supports the project as
proposed.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Doug Jewell, PE from JEWELL Engineering Consultants PC met with Ms. Andrea Wade from
USACE and Mr. Darryl Lamb from NC DWQ at the proposed project site on 8/10/04. USACE
advised that project would satisfy NWP 18 and NC DWO noted that formal written 401 water
quality certification would not be required. No prior applications have been made to
USACE/NC DWO for the Courtland Park site in Reidsville to the best of applicant's knowledge.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests related to this project are anticipated.
Page 7 of 13

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed constructed
stormwater wetland will impact less than 270 linear feet of ephemeral stream channel that
runs through Courtland Park in Reidsville. The average width of the ephemeral channel in
the park is less than 2 feet. Taking the 270 If of ephemeral channel x 2 ft avQ channel width
gives an impact area of no more than 0.0124 acres (« 0.1 ac) for the proposed wetland
project According to USACE the channel is regulated as a watershed under antecedent
conditions The channel is not perennial or intermittent and no jurisdictional wetlands are
present based on USACE on-site review (8/10/04). Also according to NC DWQ (8/10/04)
the proposed project does not require written 401 water quality certification.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
car,arately list imnactc rlne to hnth stntcture and floodine.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
n/a

Total Wetland Impact (acres) n/a
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: No jurisdictional
wetlands arepresent on the property according to USACE site review (8/10/04)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
Page 8 of 13

plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mast he included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width. then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
Unnamed irib. to
Little
Troublesome
Creek
Constructed wetland
No 2 ft
2701f
0.0124

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 270 if and 0.0124 acres (No impacts to
perennial or intermittent streams as determined by USACE, 8/10/04.
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill_ excavation. dredaine. flooding. drainage. bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres
n/a

Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the protect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0124*
Wetland Impact (acres): n/a
Open Water Impact (acres): n/a
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) n/a
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 270*
*Stream impacts are to ephemeral channel only as determined by USACE on site visit, 8/10/04.
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ~ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 9 of 13

8. Pond Creation (Note: Proposed wetland will feature extended stormwater detention akin
to a stormwater pond)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ~ stream (note: in
ephemeral stream channel only) ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Standard earth ~radin~ and compacted earthfill to
construct the earthen berms that will define the stormwater wetland.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): stormwater wetland to serve as a non-point source
water quality control control.
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Public park land, as noted earlier
Size of watershed draining to pond /wetland: 70 acres Expected pond surface area: < 1 ac
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed stormwater wetland is located within the public park area of Courtland Park in
Reidsville, NC and is intended to only benefit the existing developed watershed and channel
system. The constructed wetland will be located along an existing ephemeral channel as
determined by USACE. The project is funded by an approved EPA 319 grant administered by
NC DWO. PTCOG in Greensboro is the project manager and facilitator. There are no impacts
to perennial or intermittent streams or wetlands, as determined by the USACE during an on-site
visit with the applicant's agent - 8/10/04. The applicant will follow approved erosion and
sedimentation control measures during construction to help minimize off-site impacts during
construction /land disturbance activities.
The park site chosen was pre-determined based on previous study and on receipt of the EPA 319
grant by PTCOG. The proposed project as designed will avoid impacts to perennial and
intermittent streams and wetlands, as determined by the USACE.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 10 of 13

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ham://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Not applicable
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: ~~A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 11 of 13

a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ~ No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^ ~ /~
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. PISA
Zone* I Impact Multiplier I Required
(square feet) Mitiuatic,n
I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. n/a
Page 12 of 13

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. No significant impervious .areas proposed for
this~roiect -constructed stormwater wetland only
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No ~( t t~Io~ n~t--k-o-H-,e. ~ss~c ~-aP'Pl~ca~1S lCrw~J~~~~,
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: n/a
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

ZOO
Ap~licant/Agent's Sign~ffure Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

Z
~ ~
v
0
..
..
s
a
.~
T
4
8
0
3
0
~T~S
c
v
c
a.
0
c
0
a
Figure 1

iy 'ass
B

L,~ ? ' Ck ~~` e
~'~'~~ CdBF. , ~.v ~~
~~'
~ ~ F~.,
,~ .

'~ m A a ors ~ ~, @,~. .~~ ~S[~" .d ~, 7 : ky aYr .3< ~. ~i• 'S '..m;..,
ti ~ ^ ~ ~~ ~~~" 'V1~kF ~ , a ~ ~~ ~ Cd6 s ~ ~ 3~ ~~ ~ "

~ Ck~ ' t ~ `+ ~ s ~~ ' ~~C .'
~
~ ~ •,
~ ~~
e(~
~ s ~ .
F
~ dD

r
~' ;~ ~ y~~
~ vt' x ~s~
~ 4~ ,m

x ~ s ~ - .~ ~ - ~. ~ -.
~ ~ / A
i
r
~
~
W . ~,~ ,'~~.. 1,
, :t~; az.
~~1 ' :l. _r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~'
PTCOG -Reidsville SW Wetland Design Project
Figure 3
Legend
greenways
streams-littletrouble
~; _~ buildings-It
littletroublesome parcels
park wetland
topo-little-troublesome

1
+ V ',~ • r
cnyinevr~ng ~ ~: ~~c~~rit,w
TO
iV
n ""{ C '77
z~ ~~
~m
~ r-~ ~~ ~
rn ~~
C y..
;~,~ ~ ~\
n ~ ~~ ~\
-- Cn ~... a \`\ ~ 'SB \\\
~~ S m \ ~
+~S' \
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ \ ~ \
Z° ~ x it \\ \\ \ ~----~~ >so ~~ ~\ ~
r
a ~ \ ~ m ~~ ~ S' ~~
'~° \ \
" a ~ P\ \\ I / ~ '~\\' \\ \~ \~ \\
`n 3 I ~m • /-~\ \\\ ~ \\
\ \
li $ q I ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 3 v, ~~ ~~
\L I
$ ~ ~ I $ ~yr q ql I I\ I yes ~ v ~ ~
\ ~
. q ~ \ N \~ ~ eII~I II ~ j % \\~
~5~ ~, A m ~ ~ ~y9~ v
~ $ m $\ 1 ~ ~ ~ 3 \
~'~ ~~ \ o 1 o A I ~-~
9~ 64 \~~ ~,d'• / mss \\ \, ~ \\ I / ~ \~ss
R 6~0g ~ ~ rP ~~ ~s7 !
ti~ m \ ~~ I ~ I ~.
~s
s~
~ ~ i
\ ~:
Asa \ ~ I~' ~;, \
\ \ \ \ \ \\a \ ~ ~
1, ~ \ ~. A ~
~ ~ ~ \ ~~
~ q ~~ ~ ~
~ ~ \ \ ~\\ - \ ~ N ~
~ \ q ~
w
\ \ \ \ n \\ "! ". \
J
\ ~,
~ \\ ~1 \ \~ ~ \~ q
'~ \
~ \\ ~ `~'
"~ ~ \.~ ~ i

arcl
C

R ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~
~~
//~~ i -- n s o a
- ' ~ ~ m I
tl m
J O NO N
$ 8
1 ~~~ ~J~~ a \\ ~ g$ I I ~ ~; '~ I --
/~~5~ ~ 4 ~ ~ I~ \ ~ II II I I ~ ~
q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' I \\ \\ \\ I
\'so \~ I e~~/ oy Ig - 1 ql~ ~ \ \
~ s ~~ I I ~ ~ ~ \ ~
~\ 1 ~~ ~ 1
\ \\ \~~ a ~ \ ~ \ ~
~ ~ ~ \ ~~ ~ . it ~ ~ ~ I
I ~~ ~~ a ~ 1
\\ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~ A II e I~\ q I ~ I
b. ~ g vim 3 u
t
u ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ v A~
/ /
\ 2 's ( /~
~~ ~_ ___-
\~ ~~ /~__
antaQ ~uaosaaD
q = ~ $ ~ a~
~g
Ud
3TORMWATER WETLAND
COURTLAND PARK
REID3VILLE, NC - ROCKINQHAM COUNTY
SITE PLl1N
REVISIONS
BIOLOGICAL AND AGRICULI-URAL ENGINEERING
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607