WQ0002857_Staff Report_20240717

July 17, 2024
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Elton Luona
From: Caitlin Williams
Winston-Salem Regional Office
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
Application No.: W00002857
Facility name: Piedmont Custom Meat WWTF
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 7/11/2024
b. Site visit conducted by: C. Williams
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Glenn Price and their contact information: lg enn.price@,pacelabs.com
MI=*14h11YQ[12ZT4110011ok�muto] 101[OF ICUOMO13119040 ►AIIIKIW.1990tey., IClIeK
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
ORC: Glenn Price Certificate #: 987931 Backup ORC: Garret Dreg Certificate #: 1010625
Other Pace staff stop at the facility to turn off the irrigation pump, WSRO has requested they designate the other
Pace staff as they complete operational tasks.
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ❑ Yes or ® No
If no, please explain: A single spray head has been removed from Z1-3, this will impact the treatment capacity of
the WWTF.
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or ® No
If no, please explain: Spray fields need to be mowed and broadleaf weeds managed better.
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ® No
If no, please explain: Unclear, see comments below.
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: An additional upgradient
MW needs to be installed as required by the last permit. See comments below.
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ❑ Yes or ® No
If no, please explain: 15 sprinklers are present, not 18. The acreage is also reduced. A manure capture area has
been piped into the bar screen. It is unclear if the manure capture area was originally piped into the system.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 4

10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain: See comments.
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
MW6 (MW5 in Att C)
35.253079
-79.520366
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., AR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: MW4 has had TDS exceedances for every sample
even since March 2022, and chloride exceedances the last two sample events. MW 1 has had NO3 exceedances
every sample event since March 2022. MW5 had a TDS and chloride exceedance in October 2023. Effluent
periodically has elevated levels of fecal > 200 colonies/100mL (3/22, 10/22, 3/23, 7/23, 10/23, 3/24), nitrate > 10
ma/L (10/22, 3/23, 3/24), BOD > 30mg_/L (3/22, 10/22, 3/23, 7/23, 10/23, 3/24), TSS > 90m /g_L (3/22, 10/23,
3/24), ammonia > 15mg_/L (7/22, 3/23, 7/23, 10/23, 3/24).
13. Has a review of facility compliance been conducted (CEIs)? ® Yes or ❑ No
14. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
15. Check all that apply:
❑ No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
® Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) See
attached inspection report outlining upcoming NOV from the most recent compliance inspection.
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place? The facility received a CPA in March 2022. All
items in the CPA were resolved.
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain: The facility is still working to clear broadleaf weeds, MW-7 was not installed (upgradient
MW), an acceptable site map has not been provided.
16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
The property boundary should include Parcel 0015008 as it is owned by the
same entity. The site map should be updated to include:
• Corrected property boundaries
• Scale
• Clearly delineated surface waters (pond on property and south of
property)
Corrected site map
• Map window needs to be expanded to show all property boundaries,
habitable residences, and places of assembly within 500 ft of property
boundary
• Corrected CB and RB based on updated property boundary
• Distance measurements confirming setbacks
• All treatment units shown (bar screen, grease trap, manure capture area,
distribution boxes)
FORM: WQROSSR 06-2024 Page 2 of 4

Calculations confirming the
Z1-3 had the last spray head removed several years ago. A review of historic
spray field can
files shows it was mentioned in 2007. Calculations are needed to confirm the
accommodate 5,000 GPD
hydraulic loading is still acceptable and the spray zones can support the
as designed
permitted 5,000 GPD. Should calculations also be provided confirming the
manure capture area is not impactingflow?
Updated spray field
Z1-3 are all < 1.0 acres now due to removed spray heads. Z4 acreage needs to
acreage for Att B
be confirmed as well.
Staff collected surface water samples. There was no water leaving the pond on
Surface water sampling?
site, but water was still present in the stream on site. The stream could be
receiving groundwater discharge.
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
I.1
Completed.
I.2
Efforts are ongoing to manage broadleaf weeds.
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
Install MW upgradient of
Z 1-3
A new upgradient MW needs to be installed. This has been required since 2008.
Should an upgradient MW also be installed or Z4?
5. Recommendation: ® Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ D9n;jry,,% oate reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: 7/17/2024
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
MW4 and MW5 are more in RB than CB.
Field 4 is 0.92 acres.
4.-!�
0D2D3CE3F1B7456...
A new monitorine well has not been installed to date. and Mr. Moore continues to auestion the Duroose of installing a
new upgradient monitoring well. The current upgradient monitoring well, MW1, has historic and current nitrate
exceedances. A tree nursery is directly across the road and upgradient from the property. Based on the topography at
the site, staff believe MW 1 does NOT represent the groundwater passing under Z1-3. The spray zones are on the
southern portion of the property, on the opposite side of a low-lying area that collects water and drains to an on -site
pond. MW5 has had recent exceedances (TDS and chloride) and staff are unable to determine if groundwater is being
impacted by sprayapplication. MW4 has also had recent exceedances of chloride since irrigation activities started in
July 2022. 15A NCAC 02L .0110(d)(2) states monitoring systems within the monitoring program shall be able to: be
used to determine the backgroundgroundwater quality that is not affected by site conditions, actions, or activities.
See attached inspection report for additional comments and observations.
Staff collected effluent, monitoring well, and surface water samples were collected duringtpection.
Mr. Moore requested an on -site meeting with CO and WSRO to discuss the monitoring wells.
FORM: WQROSSR 06-2024 Page 3 of 4

Based on staff calculations, the compliance boundary is at the property boundary and the review boundary is midway
between the disposal area and the property boundary
Historic files show the old spray heads had a 53.5ft radius, the new spray heads are Irrigation King RK-41 with 1/4"
nozzles. These spray heads have a range that includes 53.5ft. The wettable area for each spray head is 8992.02sgft.
Z1-3, with four spray heads are approximately 0.8 ac based on the wettable area. The historic facility map shows Z4
was originally 0.72 ac, based on the wettable area is 0.62 ac.
FORM: WQROSSR 06-2024 Page 4 of 4

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0002857 Effective: 04/29/16 Expiration: 03/31/21 Owner : Chapel Road Properties LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Piedmont Custom Meats WWTF
County: Caswell 9683 Kerr Chapel Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Gibsonville NC 27249
Contact Person: Donna M Moore Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From Winston-Salem, take 1-40 east to 1-85 north Rt. 29 north to Brown Summit exit (left, then immediate right onto Rt. 150) 7.3
miles to Toxler Mill Road (no turns), then proceed 3.1 miles to Kerr Chapel Road 0.8 miles.
System Classifications: S1,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024 Entry Time 09:30AM Exit Time: 01:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Wil 'a—TRO`Igned by: Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): L(±v,Rwms
968199D49D...
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Treatment Barscreen Record Keeping
Treatment Lagoons End Use -Irrigation Treatment Disinfection
Storage Wells
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 6

Permit: WQ0002857 Owner - Facility: Chapel Road Properties LLC
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On July 11, 2024, Division of Water Resources staff Caitlin Williams and Brooke Stevens conducted a routine compliance
inspection of the Piedmont Custom Meats WWTF. Glenn Price, ORC, was present during the entire inspection. Larry
Moore, Owner, was present at the end of the inspection. A review of treatment facilities, storage structures, irrigation fields,
monitoring wells, and available records was completed. This review reflected non-compliance with the subject permit.
Mrs. Williams requested records digitally before the inspection on July 1, 2024. The following items have not been provided
to date: residuals removal records, groundwater monitoring reports, and soil reports.
The following violations were noted:
1. A fourth spray head was installed in Zone 4 when the zone was repaired in March 2022. The site map provided in the
November 5, 2021 application package showed four spray heads. The associated staff report noted that all material located
by Mrs. Williams and Mr. Moore showed three risers in Zone 4, as depicted on the original facility site map. During previous
site visits, Mrs. Williams discussed finding and replacing a third riser in Zone 4, as only two were present. The fourth spray
head was originally noted in a follow up site visit completed August 8, 2022 to review system repairs.
The fourth riser appears to have been installed without prior approval from the Division. In addition, this riser was installed
within 100ft of a stream. Per Permit Condition 11.11.a. all irrigation sites shall have a setback of 100ft from surface waters. A
review of available records shows Zone 4 was initially irrigated on in July 2022 after several years of inactivity. Based on a
review of available records, Zone 4 has been irrigated on twelve times since March 2022. At the time of inspection, the fourth
riser was capped due to previous operational issues.
The installation of a spray head without approval from the Division represents a violation of the subject permit. General
Statute 143-215.1(a)(3) states that to alter, extend, or change the construction or method of operation of any sewer system,
treatment works, or disposal system within the State a valid permit must be received. Zone 4 was extended without a valid
permit and was installed in such a way to violate the setbacks set forth in the subject permit. Immediately cap the supply
line to the fourth riser and remove the riser.
The following deficiencies were noted:
A. At the time of inspection, several maintenance items were noted. Per Permit Condition V.1, the Permittee shall provide
adequate inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation of the wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities.
• Two new distribution boxes were installed in 2022 for irrigation Zones 1, 2, and 3. Staff observed one of the distribution
boxes was broken and collapsing. Replace the distribution box to ensure the valve and supply lines contained within are not
damaged.
• The irrigation zones have not been mowed this summer and a significant amount of broadleaf weeds are still present.
See Figure 1. The spray pattern of Zone 3 #1 was impacted by broadleaf weeds, although this spray head was not
operational at the time of inspection. Mrs. Williams discussed the use of broadleaf weed management methods with Mr.
Moore. Mow the spray zones as soon as possible and remove the weeds surrounding Z3-1.
• Along with Z3-1, several other spray heads were clogged or not operating properly in all zones. Repair the faulty spray
heads and continue to monitor the spray heads during irrigation to ensure all spray heads are spraying properly.
• At the time of inspection, runoff from the bar screen catch basin was clearly visible. See Figure 2. This was also
mentioned in NOV-2022-PC-0004 dated January 10, 2022. Make efforts to clean the bar screen as needed to ensure influent
flow is not impeded, and staff are trained appropriately to handle screenings.
The following items of concern were noted:
• At the time of inspection, the freeboard of the lagoons was three feet. The 3ft marking on the staff gauge was almost
illegible. Per Permit Condition 111.13, the staff gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings, at inch or tenth of a foot
increments, indicating the following elevations: maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary liquid storage volume;
minimum liquid level at the bottom of the temporary liquid storage volume, and the lowest point on top of the dam. Install a
Page 2 of 6

Permit: WQ0002857 Owner - Facility: Chapel Road Properties LLC
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
freeboard marker with the described markings in the secondary lagoon as soon as possible.
• The three monitoring wells on site did not have clearly marked identification numbers corresponding with the numbers in
Attachment C, or well identification plates. Per Permit Condition 11.3 all wells constructed for purposes of groundwater
monitoring shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108, which includes specific information that must be
included on the identification plate. Clearly mark all monitoring wells with the assigned number in Attachment C and install
well plates and include all information required in 15A NCAC 02C .0108(p).
• The log book on site now includes the time and observations from the BUORC and other Pace staff when they shut off
the irrigation system. Pace staff will send Mr. Price photos when on site. Please designate the additional Pace staff as
BUORCs as they are performing operational tasks.
Other observations:
• Zones 1-3 have four spray heads present in each zone. The original site map shows that five spray heads were installed
for each zone. Mr. Price stated only four spray heads were present when R&A, now Pace Analytical, originally started
managing the system.
• The acreage listed in Att B is not being used as a spray head has been removed from Z1-3. This will be addressed with
the permit renewal.
• The old risers were not removed after the new irrigation equipment was installed.
• The tall risers observed in Zone 4 during the August 8, 2022, site visit were lowered to a reasonable height.
• The tannery operations have been suspended. The "salt burned" area downslope of the building is still visible with no
vegetation.
• The concrete surrounding the grease trap, bar screen, and catch basin has not been replaced.
• The gut bin was repaired, not replaced.
• Valley Protein is still taking solids from the bar screen and gut bin.
• The lagoon embankments have been repaired. The dry weather has prevented grass from being established. The
disturbed areas are covered with straw.
• The manure capture basin was in good shape. The manure capture area is uncovered, and it may pose a risk from
stormwater entering the system. If this area begins to impact the freeboard of the lagoons, further action may be taken.
• Irrigation volumes are determined by multiplying the run time of the pump by the gpm rating.
• The irrigation system has not been calibrated since 2021 as a new permit has not been issued since the most recent
permit expired in 2021. The irrigation system was last calibrated 4/15/2021.
• Fecal coliform results have been >2,000 MPN/g five times in 2022, 2023, and 2024.
• Mr. Moore has requested an in -person meeting as part of the permit renewal process.
• Effluent, MW, and surface water samples were collected as part of the permit renewal process.
• The pump house repairs are still in good shape.
• The new spray heads are Irrigation King RK-41 with'/" nozzles.
Page 3 of 6

Permit: WQ0002857
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024
Owner - Facility: Chapel Road Properties LLC
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Yes No NA NE
Reuse (Quality)
❑
Infiltration System
❑
Single Family Spray, LR
❑
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
❑
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
❑
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
❑
Single Family Drip
❑
Recycle/Reuse
❑
Lagoon Spray, LR
Treatment Barscreen Yes No NA NE
Is it free of excessive debris? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screenings in compliance? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the bars spaced properly? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? ❑ N ❑ ❑
Comment: See summary.
Treatment Disinfection
Yes No NA NE
Is the system working?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
❑
❑ ❑
Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the system properly maintained?
❑ ❑ ❑
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the chlorinator accessible?
❑
❑ ❑
If tablets, are tablets present?
❑
❑ ❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑ ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
❑
❑ ❑
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
❑
❑ ❑
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
# Is it a dual feed system?
❑
❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: See summary.
Page 4 of 6

Permit: WQ0002857 Owner - Facility: Chapel Road Properties LLC
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
❑ ❑ ❑
NDAR?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are application rates adhered to?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are annual soil reports available?
❑
❑ ❑
# Are PAN records required?
❑
❑ ❑
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
❑
❑ ❑
If so, has it been applied?
❑
❑ ❑
Are operational logs present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab sheets available for review?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: See summary.
End Use -Irrigation
Yes No NA NE
Are buffers adequate?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Is the crop cover acceptable?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Is the site condition adequate?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
❑
❑ ❑
Is the application equipment present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment operational?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 6

Permit: WQ0002857 Owner - Facility: Chapel Road Properties LLC
Inspection Date: 07/11/2024 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
Comment: See summary.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
❑❑❑■
❑❑❑■
❑❑❑■
■❑❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑❑❑■
❑■❑❑
Page 6 of 6

PCM Permitting Map
# Bar Screen/ _
p Lagoon 1
Grease Trap Lagoon'
CCC'
Pump Ho e
'1 °MW1 w.
Dist. Box #
72 Y
500 t from Z4 MW5
dis sal area 1 r
�� �:
MW4 Z3
87
IL
7/16/2024 1:4,514
0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
Esri Community Maps Contributors, Rockingham County, State of North
Carolina DOT, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin,

1" Plastic Impact Sprinkler
FBIPT - " x 11 4"
1 6Re+ie7,4s ON 1 Questions 11Answers
$41.04 $16.68
For commercial agriculture. Flow: 14.8-40.3 GPM, Radius;
52-5-67.2 feet, Pressure: 0-70 PSI. Threaded brass nozzles
for durability. Stainless steel spring & pin_ Features
excellent uniformity, long-lasting dependability, and is rnade
for commercial agriculture.
Base
Flaw
Thrown Radius
Operating Pressure
Trajectory Angle
Operation
Drive Mechanism
AVAILAP LITY: IN STOCK
SKU: RK-41 F
1" FNPT
16. 2- 5.6 GPM
52, 5-67.2 ft.
0-70 PSI
25`
Full Circle
Spring Arm impact

FORM: NDMLR 10-13 NON -DISCHARGE MASS LOADING REPORT (NDMLR) Page
Permit No.: WQ0002857
Facility Name: Piedmont Custom Meats WWTF
County: Caswell
Month: May
Year: 2024
Field Name:
1
Field Name:
2
Field Name:
3
Field Name:
4
Field Name:
Area (acres):
1
Area (acres):
1
Area (acres):
1
Area (acres):
0.92
Area (acres):
Cover Crop:
Fescue
Cover Crop:
Fescue
Cover Crop:
Fescue
Cover Crop:
Fescue
Cover Crop:
Load Type:
PAN
Load Type:
PAN
Load Type:
PAN
Load Type:
PAN
Load Type:
Field Loaded?
❑ YES ❑ NO
Field Loaded?
❑ YES ❑ NO
Field Loaded?
❑ YES ❑ NO
Field Loaded?
❑ YES ❑ NO
Field Loaded?
❑ YES ❑ NO
Q
ac°
a
�
'a
ac
a
;
Qac
a
ac
a
aQ
c
o
>
Q
d y
d
d v
T
R D
Q
Q
d R
N
d
>.
N
a
Q
d y
d
d
R O
Q
Q
d A
G7
d 6
>.
N O
O
Q
a) i
J
jp
R
p
O) Q
cL d
t6
w O
J
3
Z
N
.+
01 r
T N
0
J
3
Z
N
0) r
c6 G1
>+ l6
w O
J
3
Z
N
.+
a) r
R N
0
J
3
Z
N
i
d y
T
L
R
3 O
d
J
y
N
.s+ J
a
d
J
y
N
.s+ J
a
Q
t
J
7
Q O
O
3
U
3
C
O
O
3
U
7
C
Q O
O
3
U
3
C
O
O
3
U
7
E
O
O
3
U
O
�
U
O
�
Q U
O
�
U
O
�
Q U
O
�
U
Month
gal
mg/L
Ibs/ac
Ibs/ac
gal
mg/L
Ibs/ac
Ibs/ac
gal
mg/L
Ibs/ac
Ibs/ac
gal
mg/L
Ibs/ac
Ibs/ac
gal
mg/L
Ibs/ac
Ibs/ac
June
12,960
40.57
4.4
4.4
12,960
40.57
4.4
4.4
12,960
40.57
4.4
4.4
12,960
40.57
4.8
4.8
July
0
16.58
0.0
4.4
0
16.58
0.0
4.4
0
16.58
0.0
4.4
0
16.58
0.0
4.8
August
14,040
16.58
1.9
6.3
14,040
16.58
1.9
6.3
14,040
16.58
1.9
6.3
14,040
16.58
2.1
6.9
September
0
16.58
0.0
6.3
0
16.58
0.0
6.3
0
16.58
0.0
6.3
0
16.58
0.0
6.9
October
11,160
65.2
6.1
12.4
11,160
65.2
6.1
12.4
11,160
65.2
6.1
1 12.4
11,160
65.2
6.6
13.5
November
0
65.2
0.0
12.4
0
65.2
0.0
12.4
0
65.2
0.0
12.4
0
65.2
0.0
13.5
December
12,780
65.2
6.9
19.3
12,780
65.2
6.9
19.3
12,780
65.2
6.9
19.3
12,780
65.2
7.6
21.0
January
12,960
65.2
7.0
26.4
12,960
65.2
7.0
26.4
12,960
65.2
7.0
26.4
12,960
65.2
7.7
28.7
February
37,800
65.2
20.6
46.9
37,800
65.2
20.6
46.9
37,800
65.2
20.6
46.9
9,720
65.2
5.7
34.4
March
0
85.06
0.0
46.9
0
85.06
0.0
46.9
0
85.06
0.0
46.9
0
85.06
0.0
34.4
April
14,040
85.06
10.0
56.9
14,040
85.06
10.0
56.9
14,040
85.06
10.0
56.9
0
85.06
0.0
34.4
May 32,400 85.06
23.0
79.9
32,400
85.06
23.0
79.9
32,400
85.06
23.0
79.9
17,280
85.06
13.3
47.8
12 Month Floating PAN Load
(Ibs/ac/yr):
79.9
79 9
79.9
47.8
0.0
Annual PAN Load Limit
(Ibs/ac/yr):

NDMR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 01/2022 to 12/2022
Parameter
Freq.
Limit
C or G
1
2
3
4
7-7
7
8
9
10
11
12
Flow
X
Mo"'I
5000 GPD
629
590
770
1647
2830
1009
3116
3455
4715
2160
2230
1891
pH
X
weekly
6.4
6.3
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.3
TRC
X
weekly
m /L
G
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
`0 °1
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
BOD5
X
3X
m /L
G
50.4
10.5
74
NH3-N
X
3X
m /L
G
10.4
35.6
<0.1
TSS
X
3X
m /L
G
119
<3.1
80
Fecal
X
3X
/100 mL
G
>2k
44.3
>21K
DO
TDS
X
3X
m /L
G
419
459
454
Conductivity
Temp.
COD
TOC
Phenols
O&G
NO2&NO3
NO3
X
3X
m /L
G
9.9
0.58
11.2
TN
X
3X
m /L
G
53.6
47.6
23.2
TKN
X
3X
m /L
G
25.2
46
11.5
TP
X
3X
m /L
G
1.9
0.48
1.7
Chloride
X
3X
m /L
G
97.3
138
104
Sulfide
SAR
As
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Cu
Pb
M
H
Ni
K
Na
Zn
Comments: Sampling is done
in March, July,
October

NDAR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2022 to 12/2022
Storage Freeboard less than or equal
2 ft.? Yes or No
2
r.6
r.5
r.1
r.2
r.5
r
r
r.6
r.1
r.4
Field
Acres
Cover
crop
Hourly
Rate
early
IRate
1
10
11
12
1
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
X
X
X
X
---
X
X
---
X
---
---
X
2
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
X
X
X
X
---
X
X
---
X
---
---
X
3
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
--
---
---
X
---
X
X
---
X
---
---
4
0.92
Fescue
0.15
52
--
---
---
--
---
---
X
---
X
---
---
---
Comments: Fixed #4 in 2018

Monitoring Well Data Review Sheet
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2022 to 12/2022
March July Oct
PRIM -
Orthophospate
Volatile Compounds:
one of the methods below (October)
3x a year in March, July and October, annual parameters in October
Issues with TDS and NO3 in 2019

NDMR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 01/2023 to 12/2023
Parameter
©��i��
••
1 1
1 1
••
"
"
1 1
••
••
1 1
1 1
/ 1
Sampling is done in March, July, • ••-

NDAR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2023 to 12/2023
Storage Freeboard less than or equal
2 ft.? Yes or No 2
r.0
r.1
r.4
r.5
r.6
r.2
.3
.8
.4
.8
.5
.6
Field
Acres
Cover
crop
Hourly
Rate
early
IRate
1
10
11
12
1
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
X
---
X
---
X
---
X
---
X
2
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
X
---
X
---
---
X
---
X
3
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
X
---
x
---
---
x
---
X
4
0.92
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
X
---
X
---
X
---
X
---
X
Comments: Fixed #4 in 2018

Monitoring Well Data Review Sheet
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2023 to 12/2023
March July Oct
PRIM -
Orthophospate
3x a year in March, July and October, annual parameters in October
Issues with TDS and NO3 in 2019

1 NDMR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 01/2024 to 12/2024
Parameter
Freq.
Limit
C or G
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Flow
X
nthl
5000 GPD
1007
1116
1033
1135
1359
H
X
ekly
6.5
6.5
6.6
6.4
6.4
TRC
X
ekly
f3X
m /L
G
0.01
0.01
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
BOD5
X
m /L
G
170
NHs-N
X
X
m /L
G
86.8
TSS
X
3X
m /L
G
264
Fecal
X
3X
/100 mL
G
2420
DO
TDS
X
3X
m /L
G
2740
Conductivity
Temp.
COD
TOC
Phenols
O&G
NO2&NO3
NO3
X
3X
m /L
G
33.2
TN
X
3X
m /L
G
156
TKN
X
3X
m /L
G
115
TP
X
3X
m /L
G
15.1
Chloride
X
3X
m /L
G
77.6
Sulfide
SAR
As
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Cu
Pb
M
H
Ni
K
Na
Zn
Comments: Sampling is done in March, July, October

NDAR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2024 to 12/2024
Storage Freeboard less than or equal
2 ft.? Yes or No
2
r.5
.25
.5
r.3
rTj
I
I
I
I'
Field
Acres
Cover
crop
Hourly
Rate
early
IRate
1
10
11
12
1
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
X
2
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
3
1.0
Fescue
0.15
52
x
x
---
4
0.92
Fescue
0.15
52
x
---
---
--
Comments: Fixed #4 in 2018

Monitoring Well Data Review Sheet
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0002857 FACILITY NAME: Piedmont Custom Meats
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: WWI REVIEW PERIOD: 1/2024 to 12/2024
March July Oct
PRIM -
Orthophospate
3x a year in March, July and October, annual parameters in October
Issues with TDS and NO3 in 2019