Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0085812_Wasteload Allocation_19960703NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCO085812 PERMITIEE NAME: Union County Public Works Department FACILITY NAME: Grassy Branch Treatment Plant Facility Status: Proposed Permit Status: New Major Minor -I Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: $44de'- 0,0Z M6o See aL7 .cJGCL CA Domestic (% of Flow): 100 % - "/Xi Do'l Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: RECEIVING STREAM: Crooked Creek Class: B Sub -Basin: 03-07-12 Reference USGS Quad: G17NW (please attach) County: Union Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class: Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: Mark McIntire Prepared by: Reviewed by:LhLLA VA'SA- -t6z Date: 5/10/96 Date: % / 6 (W) M Modeler I Date Rec. I # 5 3 9 to 1 w4gly Drainage Area (mil ) q 3.9 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) Q, q 30Q2 (cfs) 0, Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS AfcD,, 41 Upstream Location: 50 feet upstream of outfall Downstream Location: NC 218 bridge approx. 0.3 mi downstream of outfall _ Parameters: temp, DO, fecal, conductivity I Il: Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: Chi Monthly Average Summer Winter G 0 0 02 Comments: WastefloW (M D). 02 BOD5 (mg/1): 5.0 10.0 NH3N (mg/1): 2.0 4.0 DO (mg/1): 6.0 6.0 TSS (mg/1): 30.0 30.0 Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 Residual Chlorine (µgh): 17 17 At s�•� V d 1 .� v SSOr J• , I'A. Or) i" 4�-. X\1 600 CI 160 ,•N" E 'ram' r `, ... �� ,• • / 1 I � L:, •' � �' tt'sj 35 qn in . 1 r i : .. to `ti�\ — `��. S, �� � I �` � n• /_ l M z I .- a/ r I // O �' `: �~ ` / "\ v i•t''� I , �� �~ 1 1 SSO 520 _ \i` /sr\ 1\i �� y r% 1lL�'� ,- '`•..• ' .o. 1��'° •�:� �i l ,/ •' _ ._ `�.T'�. ' _ �� � -� I / ) � dam. -• . -. .,. ", r r low� r�=b - - � ��? ' . .,;sec ��. • c.--� i •�\ ,_ ,.' .��• ,'�; ��. 10 ` . 1 { r�� �� \ ♦ �.; 1 � �� � err ,/ SSG /r ;,, • ,' 3`-�Cem. ��, / yyo / ROAD CLASSIFICATION PRIMARY HIGHWAY LIGHT -DUTY ROAD. HARD OR HARD SURFACE O IMPROVED SURFACE SECONDARY HIGHWAY HARD SURFACE C==00w= UNIMPROVED ROAD Latitude 35°07'50" Longitude 80029'40" Map # G17 NW Sub -basin 03-07-12 Stream Class C Discharge Class 100% Domestic Receiving Stream Crooked Creek Design Q 0.050 MGD Permit expires ] 3 1 / 1 SCALE 1:24 000 0 1 MILE 0 7000 FEET 1 0 1 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET QUAD LOCATION Grassy Branch WWTP NCO085812 Union County W WTP LvnbDeASjj�j Engineering Services, Inc. April 25, 1996 c Mr. David A. Goodrich z Supervisor of NPDES Discharge North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 512 N. Salisbun• Street p' Raleigh NC 27604 co co Re: Application For NPDES Permit t�v Grasse Branch Treatment Plant Union County LDESI P.N. 85161 Dear Mr. Goodrich: On behalf of the Union county Public Works Department, we are submitting, herewith, an application and supp6rting documentation for the proposed new discharge to Crooked Creek at the confluence of Grassy Branch in Union Counter. The proposed new treatment facilities will provide for the abandonment of the existing treatment facilities serving Unionville (N00030562), Piedmont Middle (NC0028525), and Piedmont High Schools (NC0030635), all of ,%v,hich are current operating under an SOC (89-40 Ad I). A check in the amount of $400.00 is also enclosed for processing. The proposed facilities are envisioned as a logical solution to the on -going problems at the three schools and as an integral part of the County's long range master plan, which is currently under review by the Division. The plant would eventually be replaced by a pump station when the regional plant is built on Crooked Creek at Rocky River. Several figures are included in the Report showing the location of these facilities. . We appreculte your cooperat' 4eC. s rt .E. DCS/fj cc: Jimmv Gordon Rex Gleason welcome and questions or comments. 1700 East Boulevard 14-C Oak Branch Drive Charlotte, NC 28203 Greensboro, NC 27407 704.376.7777 Telephone: 910.855.5785 Fax: 704.376.8235 Fax: 910.855.1864 2.04 Design Flows Based on tax maps and review of the drainage basin it is estimated that 190 residences now exist in addition to the three schools, which utilize approximately 660 acres (discounting farm acreage). Of the estimated 2,440 acres in the basin approximately 15% or 460 acres are estimated to be undevelopable as road rights -of -way, creeks or wetlands, institutional property, or utility rights -of - way (overhead transmission lines, etc.). Of the 1,320 remaining acres, at an average density of one (1) dwelling unit per two acres (double the existing density), the number of homes in the basin could increase by 660, which would represent a 350% increase in the number of residential units. Allowing for an average flow of 360 gpd per connection, 30,000 gpd allowance for the schools and 14,000 gpd for churches and small retail, the flow from the Grassy Branch area could reasonably total 350,000 gpd. However, based on a 10% growth rate and allowance for the three schools, it is unlikely that the basin flow would exceed 200,000 gpd within ten years, by which time the County would anticipate implementation of major portions of the Countywide Master Utility Plan. Accotdingly a design flow of 200,000 gpd, representing a reasonable projection of flow for the three schools, and the Grassy Branch Basin has been utilized in the development and evaluation of ■ alternatives. It should be noted that, for the purposes of this study, and in accordance with the County's direction to seek a long term viable solution to the school's problems representing an integral component of the County's long range plans, an evaluation of possible alternatives for handling only the flows from the schools (<30,000 gpd), has not been conducted and is deemed undesirable as a responsible of County Public Works funds. -7- Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requester. Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Grassy Branch Treatment Plant NCO085812 Domestic -100% Proposed New Crooked Creek B 03-07-12 Union MooresvilleC Mark McIntire 5/10/96 G17NW Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Request # 8487 OF � N.�.'I�l�iz.-.L I.rsoL'� 3UX IL 0 1996 VISION Of Et11i3.EiO?I�EZ�L O� E�IEtYT Strewn C�ia�-:fiEfii9Lfft USGS # see -below Date. Drainage Area (mi2): 43:9j Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.41 Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): 0.6 IWC M: 100%'LA * Flow estimates for Crooked Creek at the outfall are based in part on data collected at a USGS low flow partial record station (02.1247.6600) located approximately 4.3 miles upstream of the proposed discharge. This WLA is for a wasteflow of 0.02 MGD. Unionville Elementary (NC0030562), Piedmont Middle (NC0028525) and High Schools (NC0030635) currently discharge to zero flow streams. As part of an SOC compliance schedule, a new WWTP will be installed which will combine the flows from the three schools and relocate the discharge to Crooked Creek. The new plant should provide significantly better treatment than the three individual plants and enable the schools to get off the SOC. On October 30,1995 the consulting engineer for the county requested speculative limits for a waste flow of 0.02 MGD. The consulting engineer provided flow data from the three schools to support the request for a waste flow of 0.02 MGD. Union County has since applied for a permit for 0.2 MGD for the proposed Grassy Branch Treatment Plant. When inquiring about the flow discrepancy, Mark McIntire was told by the consulting engineers that the additional flow was needed to provide service for the anticipated growth in the number of residential customers near the schools. In March 1996 the County submitted a sewer system master plan to the Division for review. The plan was reviewed for references to the County's plan for expanding the proposed Grassy Branch WWTP beyond the 0.02 MGD capacity needed to get the schools off the SOC. Attached is a correspondence from Andy McDaniel to Don Safrit outlining the findings of this review. In order to encourage Union County to continue its long range planning for regional sewer service to its customers a permit limit for 0.02 MGD is recommended. Since the summer 7Q10 flow in Crooked Creek is estimated to be 0 cfs a modeling analysis can not be done to quantify the instream impacts of the proposed discharge. As a result, instream monitoring is recommended. The facility should be requested to send in a copy of a 7.5 minute USGS topo map with the exact discharge location marked. The large scale map supplied with the permit application is hard to read and an accurate lat/long measurement for the GIS coverage would be difficult to obtain. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: 1 ft. T37U A MeMl T PC4JI4-L Will6-P CAr%,JOT Ag ZtVlr11AW C,W 5-11 ,9nL'r - W OF D. z Co l Recommended by: /",-161 Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Regional Permits & Engineering: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: J U L 0 6 1996 l%✓2G`�>ar< vF GlA��teJLo�. ���� C W1,mA�e WLq a fOgMf-7c�—j )Ai /�vL) VYIM- 8E D. D2M07o. TZA, AVVi-5C or% My t lScv %lolj3 w%S��RT►. - 6vy 3 Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): PH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Monthly Average Summer Winter WQ or EL 0.02 0.02 5.0 10.0 WQ 2.0 4.0 WQ 6.0 6.0 WQ 30.0 30.0 200 200 6-9 6-9 17 17 WQ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: 50 feet upstream of outfall Downstream Location: NC 218 bridge approx. 0.3 mi downstream of outfall Parameters: temp, DO, fecal, conductivity Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Page 1 Note for Arty McDaniel From: Don Safrit Date: Thu, Jun 6, 1996 8:43 AM Subject: RE: Unionville and Piedmont Schools To: Andy McDaniel Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich; Mark McIntire Say no to 0.2 mgd - only 0.02 mgd to cover the schools. Thanks, Don From: Andy McDaniel on Wed, Jun 5,1996 6:23 PM Sub3ect: Unionville and Piedmont Schools To: Don Safrit Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich; Mark McIntire Don, At your request I've reviewed the Union Co. master sewer plan for references to the County's plans for expanding the proposed Grassy Branch WWTP (NC0085812) beyond the 0.02 MGD capacity need to get the schools off an SOC. Recall that Union Co. has applied for a permit for 0.2 MGD as opposed to a flow of 0.02 MGD which we gave speculative limits for on January 30,1996. Below are my findings from the master sewer plan: 1. On p. 23 the plan recommends construction of a new regional WWTP on the Rocky River. The plan recommends that design and construction should begin immediately "to minimize the proliferation of small package plants...". Unionville and Piedmont Middle and HS would be included in a future service area as outlined in Figure 4. 2. On p. 25 Table 8 outlines Piedmont HS/Unionville WWTP as an immediate priority for improvements (presumably because the schools are currently under an SOC). A design capacity of 0.06 MGD is listed along with 8" sewer lines. 3. The western portion of Union Co. is forceasted to have the highest population growth due to the proximity to Charlotte. Figure 7 illustrates the proposed sewer lines for the Greater Goose Creek basin which includes service to the Unionville area and Piedmont Middle and High Schools. The plan recommends construction of the proposed sewer lines to begin immediately in the western part of the basin and be phased roughly the further east you go. A sewer line and pump station connecting Unionville and Piedmont Middle and HS to the proposed Rocky River regional WWTP is scheduled to go into service in the year 2015. After reviewing the sewer system master plan my recommendations for a management strategy in this case would be to permit the proposed Grassy Branch WWTP for 0.02 MGD. This would allow for adequate service to the three schools and improved treatment as stated in the letter to you from Dale Stewart requesting speculative limits (Oct. 30,1995). Mark McIntire was told by the consulting engineer that the 0.2 MGD flow is needed as a result of updated population growth estimates for the area. The additional flow would be used to provide service to residential customers. I feel that updated growth estimates should be addressed in an addendum or revision to the sewer master plan in order to encourage the Page 2 County to continue its planning efforts. The master plan submitted for our review does not address the use of package plants as an interim wastewater treatment solution until connection to the proposed regional plant is available. In addition, a 0.2 MGD discharge is more likely to have an impact to the recieving stream, Crooked Ck. However, since Crooked Ck. is estimated to have a S7Q10=0 cfs flow I can not quality this impact using our current models. Please let me know your thoughts on the matter so I can process this WLA. August 22, 1997 MEMORANDUM To: File From: Mark McIntire NPDES Group Subject: NPDES permit modification Grassy Branch WWTP - NCO085812 Union County Background Union county was issued NPDES permit number NCO085812 on October 14, 1996. About a year prior to that issue date, Union county requested speculative Iimits for a 20,000 gpd facility. Speculative limits were granted. When the permit application came in from the county, a flow of 200,000 gpd was requested. As this discharge was proposing to remove three school discharges, all flowing into zero flow streams, it was deemed appropriate by the Division to grant only that flow needed for the schools. A permitted flow of 30,000 gpd was granted. Union county and Land Design Engineering subsequently requested an Authorization to Construct for a 30,000 gpd wastewater treatment facility. The plans and specifications were reviewed and found to be satisfactory. An ATC was issued to Union county on March 7, 1997. This permit modification request is for an increase in permitted flow from 30,000 to 50,000 gpd. The alternatives analysis for this discharge was reviewed and found to be satisfactory. The permit was drafted with a flow of 0.05 MGD and no change in permit limits. r, is y &r� „C' / i %ai,..e iP/an ilp 7 Vn CY? Ir Goo 3u42 J Graa hcrfl Cre & . C 7S4 x;e oId!�E KAI ^/c 00 3 o s6 a 1 /r e es G? l'C //' C w / e? %' A.Sd rlGt �t ` /VC U0 Z-e S2 S / SG Ne'/c {S 7 c2 crrc' /-- Ifv-"a Sd ,-?j - ivco03odl3S S Z-7 4 c R'� a sew � � 4 / 5-a-5-a-.7,� "Ile -r !i'r., e d Ch07t 7 ee/O AIC, 0 -Le pel -_;c f� 2s 70 /U i F �P.n� •� c►S Lf_P�t Gl��t cf` !�► <' <tc .--'':�.>r_C li, / /.7 7f lf.!Li4, `/L+,'� ice!/ / "� �q�•tJ (�!'rr !/ b2/' ,^ C; coo �`P/� . �r J �7 e i� J� le-s'7` �: ? i 71 �Gn S'd SCNoa�l Ci,I/ G!�n ��0.3D/••'�l,li. -Sr�•�-, .,7Z' 000 14, Si 4;, Page 1 Note for Andy McDaniel From: Don Safrit Date: Thu, Jun 6, 1996 8:43 AM Subject: RE: Unionville and Piedmont Schools To: Andy McDaniel Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich; Mark McIntire Say no to 0.2 mgd - only 0.02 mgd to cover the schools. Thanks, Don From: Andy McDaniel on Wed, Jun 5, 1996 6:23 PM Subject: Unionville and Piedmont Schools To: Don Safrit Cc: Carla Sanderson; Dave Goodrich; Mark McIntire Don, At your request I've reviewed the Union Co. master sewer plan for references to the County's plans for expanding the proposed Grassy Branch WWTP (NC0085812) beyond the 0.02 MGD capacity need to get the schools off an SOC. Recall that Union Co. has applied for a permit for 0.2 MGD as opposed to a flow of 0.02 MGD which we gave speculative limits for on January 30,1996. Below are my findings from the master sewer plan: 1. On p. 23 the plan recommends construction of a new regional WWTP on the Rocky River. The plan recommends that design and construction should begin immediately "to minimize the proliferation of small package plants... Unionville and Piedmont Middle and HS would be included in a future service area as outlined in Figure 4. 2. On p. 25 Table 8 outlines Piedmont HS/Unionville WWTP as an immediate priority for improvements (presumably because the schools are currently under an SOC). A design capacity of 0.06 MGD is listed along with 8" sewer lines. 3. The western portion of Union Co. is forceasted to have the highest population growth due to the proximity to Charlotte. Figure 7 illustrates the proposed sewer lines for the Greater Goose Creek basin which includes service to the Unionville area and Piedmont Middle and High Schools. The plan recommends construction of the proposed sewer lines to begin immediately in the western part of the basin and be phased roughly the further east you go. A sewer line and pump station connecting Unionville and Piedmont Middle and HS to the proposed Rocky River regional WWTP is scheduled to go into service in the year 2015. After reviewing the sewer system master plan my recommendations for a management strategy in this case would be to permit the proposed Grassy Branch WWTP for 0.02 MGD. This would allow for adequate service to the three schools and improved treatment as stated in the letter to you from Dale Stewart requesting speculative limits (Oct. 30,1995). Mark McIntire was told by the consulting engineer that the 0.2 MGD flow is needed as a result of updated population growth estimates for the area. The additional flow would be used to provide service to residential customers. I feel that updated growth estimates should be addressed in an addendum or revision to the sewer master plan in order to encourage the • Page i County to continue its planning efforts. The master plan submitted for our review does not • address the use of package plants as an interim wastewater treatment solution until connection to the proposed regional plant is available. In addition, a 0.2 MGD discharge is more likely to have an impact to the recieving stream, Crooked Ck. However, since Crooked Ck. is estimated to have a S7Q10=0 cfs flow I can not quality this impact using our current models. Please let me know your thoughts on the matter so I can process this WLA. SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes X No SOC No . EMC WO 8 9 - 4 0 Ad II (Pendincr ) To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Attention: Mark McIntire Date: July 11, 1997 AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT NPDES PERMIT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS County: Union Permit No. ACA085812 MRO. 97-051 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Grassy Branch WWTP Union County Public Works Department Post Office Box 987 Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0987 2. Date of On -Site Investigation (if conducted): 06-03-96 (by G. T. Chen) 3. 4. 5. W Report Prepared By: G. T. Chen Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: None (Jimmy Gordon, Union County Assistant Public Works Director, 704/283-3819). Verified Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 07' 50" Longitude: 800 29' 40" Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. Ensure discharge points) correspond to NPDES permitted discharge points. USGS Quad No.: G 17 NW USGS Quad Name: Stanfield, NC Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Yes. 7. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The site is relatively flat with 1-3% slopes. The site does not appear to be in a flood plain. Also the facility is to be built above ground to avoid any potential flooding. 8. Location of nearest dwelling: Approximately 1000 feet. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Existing treatment facility a. What is the current permitted capacity of the facility? N/A. Facility has not been built. b. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two (2) years: Original Authorization to Construct was issued March 7, 1997. C. What is the actual treatment capacity of the current facility (design volume)? N/A. Facility has not been built. d. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A. Facility has not been built. 2. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: The Union County Public Works Department proposes to construct a 0.05 MGD wastewater treatment plant to serve three Union County schools (Unionville Elementary School, Piedmont High and Piedmont Middle Schools) which are on a Special Order by Consent (EMC WQ 89-40 Ad II, pending) , single family homes, and minor retail businesses (future). The proposed facility will be an extended aeration package plant consisting of influent pumping, rough screening, aerated flow equalization, long term aeration, circular mechanical clarifiers, aerated sludge holding facility, ultraviolet disinfection with backup chlorination/dechlorination, tertiary filters, standby power with automatic transfer switch, and instrumented effluent flow measuring. 3. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit No.: N/A. Residual Contractor: N/A. Telephone No.: N/A. b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP: N/A. PFRP: N/A. Other: N/A. c . Landfill: N/A. d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify): Waste Authorization to Construct Staff Report Version 10192 Page 2 sludge will be removed and transported by Union County Public Works Department to the Union County #2 WWTP for final disposal. 4. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class III, see attached rating sheet. 5. SIC Code (s) : 4952 Wastewater Code (s) : Primary: 03 Secondary: 04, 02 Main Treatment Unit Code: 06107 6. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please indicate) Date Submission of Plans and Specs May 31, 1996 not met Begin Construction June 30, 1997 not met Complete Construction August 31, 1997 *The proposed facility is to be constructed by the Union County Public Works Department to serve three schools (Unionville Elementary School, Piedmont High and Piedmont Middle Schools) that are currently under an SOC (EMC WQ 89-40 Ad I I , pending) . PART III - EVALUATION AND RECOMMNDATIONS The Mooresville Regional Office has reviewed the subject request for the modification of an Authorization to Construct (A to C, No. AC0085812 ) that was issued March 7, 1997 to the Union County Public Works Department with approval of the construction of a 0.03 MGD wastewater treatment plant. The Union County Public Works Department requests that the A to C be modified for the construction of a 0.05 MGD facility. Since the design capacity of the WWTP is to be increased from 0.03 MGD to 0.05 MGD, the Technical Support Branch may need to review the subject request and determine an appropriate wasteload allocation. Pending review and approval by the SERG and Technical Support Branch, it is recommended that the subject request be approved and an Authorization to Construct for a 0.05 MGD WWTP be issued to the applicant as requested. Authorization to Construct Staff Report Version 10192 Page 3 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. Signature(,6f Report Preparer Water Quality egional Supervisor Date Authorization to Construct Staff Report Version 10192 Page 4 A46G4 "C=)" ' SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X SOC No. EMC WQ 89-40 Ad II (Pending) To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Attention: Mark D. McIntire Date: June 4, 1996 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION County: Union Permit No. NCO085812 MRO No. 96-131 PART I - GENERAL ,INFORMATION 1. Facility and'Address: Grassy Branch WWTP Union County Public Works Department Post Office Box 987 Monroe, North Carolina 28111-0987 2. Date of Investigation: 06-03-96 3. Report Prepared By: G. T. Chen 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Jimmy Gordon, Union County Assistant Public Works Director, (704) 283-3819 5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Highways 601 and 218 in northern Union County, travel west on Highway 218 approximately 1.90 miles to the junction with Unionville Brief Road (SR 1601). Turn right onto SR 1601 and travel south approximately 0.7 mile to the junction with SR 1610 (Old Fish Road). Turn left onto SR 1610 and travel west approximately 0.6 mile. The proposed site is located in a wooded area near the receiving stream approximately 1000 feet north of SR 1610. 6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 07' 50" Longitude: 800 29' 40" Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No.: G 17 NW USGS Quad Name: Stanfield, NC 7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application? Yes. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The site is relatively flat with 1-3% slopes. The site does not appear to be in a flood plain. Also the facility is to be built above ground to avoid any potential flooding. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approximately 1000 feet. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Crooked Creek a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin -Pee Dee & 03-07-12 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving stream is about 35 to 40 feet wide with a rock/sand/mud bottom. The water in stream appeared to be muddy, and about 5 to 18 inches deep with a noticeable flow. Downstream users are not known. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.20 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility? N/A. Proposed facility. C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? N/A. Proposed facility. d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years: N/A. e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: The initial phase of the proposed facility will be an extended aeration package plant consisting of flow equalization, long term aeration, clarifiers, effluent dual media filtration, ultra violet disinfection, effluent monitoring and alarm, and possibly standby power. g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Unknown. h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A. 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: NPDES Permit Staff Report Version 10/92 Page 2 a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM �Permit No.: N/A. Residuals Contractor: N/A. Telephone No.: N/A. b. Residuals Stabilization: PSRP: N/A. RFRP: N/A. Other: N/A. c . Landfill: N/A. d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify): Waste sludge will be removed and transported by Union County Public Works Department to Union County #2 WWTP for final disposal. 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class II, see attached rating sheet. 4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary: 03 Secondary: Main Treatment Unit Code: 06107 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)? Yes. 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A. 3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please indicate) Date Submission of Plans and Specifications May 31, 1996 met Begin Construction June 30, 1997 Complete Construction August 31, 1997 *The proposed facility is to be provided by the Union County Public Works Department to Serve three schools (Unionville Elementary School, Piedmont High and Piedmont Middle Schools) that are on SOC (EMC WQ 89-40 Ad II, pending). 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated NPDES Permit Staff Report Version 10/92 Page 3 all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide • regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray Irrigation: Economically unfeasible ($2,801,750.00 estimated). Connection to Regional Sewer System: Economically unfeasible (Connect to Monroe WWTP would cost $22,178,110.00). Subsurface: Site soil not suitable. Other Disposal Options: Not evaluated. 5. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous materials utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? There are no known groundwater, air quality, and/or hazardous materials concerns. 6. Other Special Items: None. PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Union County Public Works Department requests an NPDES permit for the operation of a proposed wastewater treatment plant to serve three Union County schools (Unionville Elementary School, Pidemont High and Pidemont Middle Schools) which are on a Special Order by Consent (EMC WQ 89-40 Ad II, pending). An on -site investigation performed by staff of the Mooresville Regional office revealed that the site is suitable for the proposed facility. Pending final review and approval by the SERG, it is recommended that an. NPDES Permit be issued to the applicant as requested. Signa ure of Report Preparer Water Quality Regio F6 Date NPDES Permit Staff Report Version 10/92 Supervisor Page 4 ItATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS Name of Facility: �%� P1444 Owner or Contact Person: • Mailing Address: D County: + Telephone: &a) ?_8 3 - 3$ AV Present Classification -....New Facility 1/ Existing Facility_ NPDES Pier. No. NO ,B/Z Nondisc. Per. No.WQ Health DeptPer No. Rated - Telephone:.•GG3 -/G W Date• r- •w Reviewed by: Health Dept Telephone: Regional Office Telephone: Central Office Telephone: ORC: Grade: Telephone: Check Classification(s): _ Subsurface Spray Irrigation ,_.,_ Land Application Wastewater Classification: (Circle One) I II III N Total Points: IS- 81.815LIWACEM491910MAIM (check all Willa drat apply) llu . esptk tanks 2_.putw tanks dor. lipdosing systems 4.send was 6L_9rease trapAntemeptor s..__0mmmer separators ?'. , ravltr suimrfaoe Ir"merd and d wosal: a. ---.ptsssurs subsurface tresinw t and disposal: vPRAY flsy3 mm G1Ttp�l (do* all utdss the apply) 1�_pnik nkmq usatmet+t (dellNgon no. 32 ) s�_isgoons &! INE tanks 4`�pump tanks a" titters Wn ttap&dsiasptor E.okuwster espardors disudection 10`�Chemkal addition for nubbnV*m control 11.__sptsy krigation d 'wastewater In addition to the above efasslAcatlons, pretreatment of snstowstsr In excess of these components shall be rated vaing the point rating system and will require an operator with an appropriate dual certification. LAND APPL"MO"ESIDUALS CLASSIFICATION (Api" only 10 gamer hdit 1.__�I.r�d appikation d bicedids. residuals or contaminated soft on a designated do. WASTEMY RTMTIWEWFACUTYCLASSM ►M The folw& tq sydems shall be assigned a Mass 1 dsssYication. 92MM the flow 4 d a skgnlf=1 quardity or the technology k unusudy a mon. to raguhe oonsidsration by the Commission on a ease-by-cese beWr (Cho* 1 Appmpride) 1._iOiNMEater Separator Systems conrietkp only d physical separatiom pumps and disposal: 91 $aptkc Ti "wW Fitter systems amsksting only of septic lento, doskq apparatus. pumps.sand f kov. deirdection and dyed disahatge: 2 _,L9goon Systems conslOV only of pml,,.* a y beatmerC lapoans. purnpa. disinieatiom neoessary dwMiffil Vestment for etas or nutrient control. and dtsd dec wW. 4`__40P Recyde choundwater Remedldbn "ertt; ootuk" only d witwoer separators, purnpt. sk strippkn% Carbon adsotptlom dislMection and ors operations Wth discharge to Kweas MtatetK 7.,__.�Wstsr Plant sludge handing and bad- wash water treatment: Sesfood pro mkng omldkp d screening and dbppos@L 4`.11r+ Je4@mly dhwhwgbV "am, with the exception d Asrobk Trwtment orals. vO be darsctfied 11 pwmltsd after July 1. 1993 or r upon kwpedion by the oMdM R is found that the system b not tm tg && qust* operated or maintained. Such systems wN be notMed d the dassPiastion of mWasslrmilon by the Comrnissk r4 In w4ft. The following scale is used for rating wastewater treatment facilities: (circle appropriate points) ffEM POWs (1) Vowtim Mstmwrnm Links or UduMid PtKtssdtMI PMWm (w dof~ No. {2) . =ON FLOW OF PLAW IN ppd (not apPtk" to nm Ooffiaftww oo04 *raters, mops 110 On twain for .Uftpr Plefft to* dwed qde aystetno(ete dt kom No.1and faAolflts QotrsiatltM orry of McRr "Xd) « horses (4)(d) and (t 1NdH 0 • 3M.O 0.».....«r«...w ......»..w.«...t 1��1 • , 100.000. - rNr...... 100.001 • 2110. A s00.0011 • 1AOO100/0./-./. ....mow .....•••»•� 11000,001 •&f�.YYY«...r»......«»w.w»•«•wr».NNN.•••N«N..wr..N«»wNw ww««wN»M10 lM.001 (asd UP) we i pM addltWa Ior each MOM ppd o a* 9918 a wlaiRlsotasr of .._._.w.wa0 pin How (—�d {bj PgaNAINAftYR71Pi�CE58 ( doMibnNo.� (a) ..... ...wwNNrN.w.t (b) Yedrank al Somwe. Stade Sono re or Commkoft DrAMN» 1 (C) � �Nww»1«.N.r«.»»N.NN.wwMr..rNN««.«.N.N.MM.•.www.».«N.r.«N.».NN»r.r..rw.»»N••NN••••••.•• • W y (d) oAumdM POTOW •N».•rr.Mwwww».wow»�r•ww.rw.NNwNMMM. w.r«.N.»r.wwN.».w.N•N� (e) Hw Manuft 00*0 wwwN.r•rwwwr•rM.•Nrwr.N.w.t or f) komwoMed Horrr Moaoutrnwnt• ..ww..w �) 6dwers FbwN.r.«NMN»r«N..w•««M.•_w•w.•».»...«\N.Nr«...«.rN.r.rr.»w.rr»»rN«r NNM.«MN•..r..».NN•wN•• ..N«.».«.NMN.M.«.wM_r.»w----wwM.»•rwwr.r.M.N. 11)' or". o or off SsPMem • drwRy .. Oludwed Air Phoatbn.rww..• " Pessfwottrndbn.........+wNw "'b (s) 'UNffSPFCCESM rb )Sotk Tank (M do&*bn No. b) ) bajh. oN Tank,PdffM" c) Seettanp Pardo or fleRltrp Tams for InorpaNc Noe►toak MaodoY (skrdpt hsndWrp facrdq for water �iostbn platto. sand. " Wra i" WOW teateat WW eat# W" WCh ss PM orr..Nws (a) IlEMWDAWT J111dE01r () (i) A.radbt�Mph PwAy o:rp«+ SYOWn ODAW•-Air Symm.w...w+..«r..r.ww•N.r.r ww.wwr..«w 1 0 ft1*4 or 0A �) TFa.r � !fth Lie ' 09andatd Rate«w...w.w_r.rrrwr wra Packed Tower.N.NN«..»..«,.........N»».»www......ww......rr»w......... wwa POW 10 p� Motode I Atrated Rw or AwMd dbbpteal tv)) 10 M�ro N.«M•w.r�w......wrww N•rwww.«w.t o IlscA 0ulatlt+p .9 �abltrstbn Lapootrs _ br) Mdspe sytetn for aoenbirrtd =bonacoouo rersw d DOD and nboponous wtrAWW n (see "Wtbn No. 12)(PW" for fMs Maas Mere to Jo In WOW fo tome (SX&)p) through (5)(a)(41). s krp ft e>attdtd asrasbn proaoao (ace ddtrWon No3a) tRl�hp other than the estended "Melon .. x) Nosritrt addkw s 10 srtlW= DOD rst WEA Dow• --•a xl) •bb&W CAM ('St+psrStw lbrps'jaddltbn. «a {b) (1) /letadbn • Mph Parllr ORION 0 00und Air o MwhvdCW $ypetn Mes4 foaft or MM_N._�_w..+.�1.ww.+.+iw+�wi. , MPws Skrdpt Rnwatbn.... (N) Ho Sand'pard Rat . a J10 AwMd tlttstat..rMei/iitt�ifil.iNr t 0 r; F�tittdit (� VAft..rr.w.M...«..r Z8AMR1foRADVMICEDGT TM (�) • •ukhwfi mp--titbn. t i {b) !bordered or OmwW AdkVW Cpa�b�a+ fiod- ob Catbon tags-m in 1i s •� At t o d) ^ R e lEMdnsdslyfio ..._.�.. - — A f Evans Ssparati�on`.,. r....—_.•. _ — j �; Iand Apptkstbn of Tmatod Wkrerd pee ddMWon N0. Zb) (not ippkobb for sand. Wxrei. ilono and cow sirerlar asinine Memo") by No raw maim w.r.wrwrw.w..r•r...wti+M.rwN�wNw•«ww. w« fla two by 5bt giW PeD F' - a e (Sot d81bWnoNo. !)- Ponds w«.-...._........r............—.-_: PoWftq astat .r.•rrr .rr.w. � i �� 1 (1) Pad Awa*m - cascads..........N..N.........N....N.......»..»..._.N.NN.....N.N.NN....N........A . Mused or Rhe&arjeal. ...».»w...».......2 1 (") Reverse...N..M.MN.M.M.w�wwwN.N.r.r.......rMr..NN ...NNNN ..2 (n) Sind or Wwd4ock Fret m .• bit rate t� NN.w�.N......wwwNN..r....�...w..N..wN.N • (0) Tiestmws poawses for Iefw,No Of terid oyanlde Nw.NNw.w......wwNww.■. w.:.w.1 p) womme pew for reerrvval of wit. nr aoftb other Om motel or ayaride 15 (7) T (a) Siudge Olgesdon Tw* - Heated (ow d*) 10 AwoW fAnlnaud ) NNN .......N..N......w..... w.M� 4 chorkal or Own" t LANs ia) �Os �.v %� Y w Vacuum Assisted. w»www.NA (d) Sludgy. SAftow A 0) SkIdge Conakwier f chlk kw OY a f) Sludge ThWww (Oavtlr)N------ .A - 0) Olse0ke0 Air FbuWon Unit (not appleWo to a w* raged as (3Xq)-N.ww...w..�r...r� • h) - Sbdge tics utihaton pndkrdhq gas storage) l) "Nip HAW9 Tank - Aerated... �� NMY.w.M..M.....N.w.w..N.......w.M.w■w......N.w.r•NN.N..MN..www.r.NMNMN.wwww.M.MNM.....r.NNs.2 (l) kldfNmw (not kckm q sdvatad aaebon eeg mmion).wwNN..Nr.......r«......... .10 • ((k) Yaauurn Filter, Cenaffugs. or Filter Pies or other shhdlar dtrrrawft devices. AESiDUALs 1211 10 P) Ullll".11111 A (irlick," Indnsrats0 ash) lb) Lard Applir asfOn (sudsce and subsurface) (w deEiNtbn 02a) by comacftw a Land apptieatbn gwstor or IsdW gwmtor who holds the land appiisWon psm* • or Scull pwm.NNNw..LAN. w2 Me) "0edieated Landirl(budq by to p maktoe of to waart wader NUUMet faMy t0) b) Old', anatien .........� c) Ozone d) RadlatbnN.»wN.....�.�/ v (10) ICAL ADDITCN SYS VA(S) ( see d erWon No. $) (not appreabie to dwnkx l addWons rated as been (30. � a)(=l). PXa)• (slit)• (yH M(e). ft> (0)(b) or (ti)(c) : points each: s M..rN....NNM.. .... s` wA (11) as,s N (a) Moidrq Ponds. Notdlrq Tanks or Sstft Ponds for Otgathie or Task tlitatert k hhotudeq wastes from tetinhq operraation�s containirq nitrogen w phosphorus compounds In amrounts dgnalkMly pewter than Is common fbr dorereetic wasterratsr........w.....w«+... w.N........■...w.a...........�w.rr.rw..ww.r.r...wN.w....w� (b) Slfiwtet Flow Equaftoion (not appiiewble to storage tracks which an iMsrent in iaed apples on e1rsens)._2 e) Stage Discharge (not epplteaW to Swap trades I *wW In land ).----�..�-�--= TheOr l�Po� C�iot - 1OTAL QA9SFCAICTI ftfl*25 Point lass t �50 Points .w _............w........ P45 Pak" OWN " Palate Fadlthes ti+A+O a tafinp of as though bur points. NwhoM, do not twoo, a aaetftd oporabr. FaeriWw " an aodvaeed *Ape pooes M be a■segnod a nkdmaemr dsasliaadon of Class 4 FacOdeshwing ivaaim proosaw forth .m,wv l d msW ar cloOds wE be udgrod a m tirttum d■salloation d Cis 1L Facadss h■nleg sea unm prooesses for On bbb*W wmwd of phoWhmo LAM be a■stgrnd a alai *nm d■ssSk I, of Claw IL JOUDERNRCM The folow ft dsfkWwu dW apty tlrougltout title Subchapter. (1) Aakwed Carbon Ssds. A nsthod for romx q sofdhie oWift material tract mum moat dffuewM a aioiwrre-" beds used In tins Unshod w0 how a fbw rats fevm two to eight pslbes Per teetnrte per equate fact and mq 0e eltlrar upfbw or dowetllow sateen beds. Carbon tug or array not be repserrated an the waatswatsr avoinv nt plant alit; (,tiy Aerated lagoons. A bash in ~ ail sands ens nukasMhod In awpeesbn ad by which biolooW osiMW or wgsdc mew la reduced tl+touplh Wtmdw aooebeated t wWor of acygm on a flao~thwo basis; lsrrede0 (3) Awatioa bringbg about hdmaw aornot belossn alr or Mph pwfty acygen In a tfq�el0 by spay gpawn r dam' Awadm An sludge peooeas uW2ft a mhr man hydraufk dots Ohm i then s1 1b how& (e) my enarrapsd sbs. Any site on whirl► a amp is produced. rnsraged. and heerested (Crop h+ol Was grssew frees. 0* (5) A A pass Oy sMtkJt the at monlarn ion Is !lest converted to dkwWod atttenanla (pH adwstrnsnt) with �ateretonk th■n fabaaed Is ft aamraspthste by phyakal m+eatra; or arlhr aitnlr peoossws ~Mime petroleum produm a nh as bormorw toluerfa, and sybnr, . (b�afioet The eepstwatbn d eheestad an0on by an we d a furnace to pev�ri0e a:aentsh Mgh tereq�esusirlrld++rolas�s and osldas tfie Stage. A stage of wstawatsr troMmetrt designed 10 adlisve tiscondw aMMI linty ` RCowl tgs. A ffloWanbal dsvfos im ~ omaftugd brae la used to separate sands truer q�u�ids ar to separate lgUk% d �hrsi� tinsbeK - = - (fh CAemek�l Addltbn syXtLn* The addetbn of afnmkst(s) to wastewater at an appkadon po�krt for purposes d hpwobq colds eemweaL pH squstyal. alalnfty oonteof. eta; the cgmblaty b sspetfrtunt tiiM dlKeront chwW des and dltetent appticadon poNts to adieus a epe A, result wfl be eonddered are system; the aspabfty ftooeaddd dwn*:al(s) to dud unit WE be rated as or* gftm; cspabW to add a dwrhol at a ditersN lion pdens br dlX*n t (f0) chaff ad u dpe =Mwkq. room ft cacti as �alre ew waVowd such s Imes. fw* dtialds. or a a wt bs TM adr:ltbn d a p�ofyrrrr attrdps to aoatssos th rttass prior b application to a dal sterfng do -Ion; (11) Cased Cyals Sy m. Use of ho" pardr or ho" lards far aorftkw m of waaxswow oortoahhing ft%anlc. eroet taste mat.&A from sand. peal wusw stores or other slmellar opera W a such "am shal carry a nuatmurrr d two points regardleft d pwq tag tacistles or ashy other rimers-: (d C&Wmdammonia r� �wftf the same b 000 arrd Nkroprious Rea+oval by Mrdfcasf� A tittle slaps system "tied to adAm perk* stlluert In" an d00 rage bbgkal taaatot; (t3) 7ho pa RW or oompNte - d Ion of rssidwf eMoefrre in a Iquid by uV dremrt el or phydeal pooser0 s) D Adrimbn Peaces. The oonversion of rArase.ntropen to mwen Ow ltrAr a 1 '16 poom tar wwrl�r tawWe loft"M am Mann► M1t gat ai fth4olown rr+satlar�l �r": W Pova. A poseMt ararMata wrd+MiMM�y Ica ParaM/t �t�rMlarMO 1I I. a1 M MWIS twoup+ 7f PUMP INOWM AIM Tft �6;;i aard at wMlt�u fir era. alaranl as • awMMrs of w11�r waMaMl+t &VMM � rr !a ftoomm" of at in so WM at be &rlaloa: OW asiod boo haollMrlalion. oat Aw+rvt To pva of warms» rk and mew ft" OMW nro W &W swr.wa . a.t arq waMr•rr Mira Swaim" at fir+ NPW wdnrrMatlon M OMW aad a OW OWV OPOW OWIftr. A d.rW .rhld► •riMMas aad ware car at W: , rw . A shasiot prww M ~ rrs rw On dNawrs ■■iMaRaM aw 680&Vrd: L SW A GW atANM 4W 1■odlyd ry !RUN wt sr+ M1 W Wplkd 1, W d IV ap SOS so go volo■M or by smom000t v#"n « =woo.w+. ls IV W..r mapdowbod OR (III r to forth: TMrratrs of gi •MiMM� �• awM • W am fir Sow Mooft at Moto Mn at Wom000 raver a bw ant as a ittiowwsw � rM►� �MM4 ar�ei� I�ralrrL wl�r �+r1 err aAe�� w�rr 11r� �s s w �i1� rlyd tar w" NMI wf>r tbsoll UiMra: and eport �+0 r sditw �,a «waft rW ). I�Mrttrtn 111MMMa AT1ir MMat+MwW or a i rsM�� "vW 'f apo ft atr�lrr� a�lrni� r nowt. w,o•n: ��iratl. fto>tpiMir wow TM nomw at plooliwrt �r111 w..1�1ww y snob---- - �Ir+/r+r0 r loodooa` 'Mr 1�w. « /1�o�MP+�or1a A 1 oft MM/ tdbWkl soma" fiaatsMo i &AkbM dMOVIOR W r ON@ aMst�rD a1 M* WoondMe �: ��� � a1MeMorn wwril+st awrrMy narrna rlrs r rwMar SMAWa DA- fir Ica eery Matra p1�a: �. of low" �+ a wle AMe.Yr1� . Tsub wein ow, .�a:.�« weft � � ��Ro^ of as+otati **W nt spomw d Mr aft a�an faa� pi Y fir+ watwlMi slap r arMrllnO aft hnitrt a1 Mr Is- fM'Mn1i1: Lt�ris Gov *AWd W fts& A Mop- III- l eM1la+ MMw Mt man �1tat aaMAM one a pMr�lc �'Icr"+ b � Mr't'� K r M Wbeft or wManwstae MOM Aire arawif w tAt RWMaL A WA PwiA+InaMAMry ON UML Lot Lot gte�iernM � � Via`. Wes+ s M w .rr*rrtlft to MMPwt A. 41Mr tar �1t"o � L TW wr�Me+ia Mt a wsaMM • r aMmMM roftla db*d k at m11rw fir r nrrrads arrMrroaM 1a r aw.P and raoMMMat fir r ✓loot a Mt $matmtla pwMMMM Y apMwe b So arty /M"11� � � Mt .■t�swlar WOMAN ptaA WMI wr0: PWS M h►llastn r Irtdrlterf • .ot1 W • tnr or t'i lww �r Y ft In r�Mi"ft for �NMMr at Wooft nabob err aomptemood ' i�ooeWRMrs. � MratU+f diitM 1lrrwr+ t and Via. � S � 1: A 0 , r, obwoao m fir alar�fion pwrsM irriooa a11RiMo 1,11W M fir �lsrna wyt: fi r tMrrMlyd nw: ftM� in IrMn ftowso Ot mkL A seeghM Moaaw h tip a tarry oseltarei�+MtMo 4� a p on~ t Intitloraw glcMt Orraalta. A W IiM� jr� �w� /warty M �' aMiowMoor Ann Mwn/+ owns h �1ot+ a a�wlat Mt Irk a�"� i� w wMllad: pandrn at alirNt ismb aaedC INdk .fir am other alas++" psooss h aR+iel+ trthar � ~ � daMirre atwras; I�Orr+ac ii■w+d foot on Vasa aw awegrAtd h err hm a look" bo `W ��M W hitraglMMl . Mr aaart tNt at eery lAtr as AiM+te h iu4arMpr PR! W « be No iti+ Mil arse aata�r My& Mfg 0 Mhoompo Hors. A M1� �! ' �o � fir allit+�ao twin+ a KWW "NOMr+ @r lr. car - /sue. Afdaw •rM" wrlp es~ r M• err r MMat f1 ~� wlt. Mr Nadu fir r/ swd Mwt Itarte ass rr► ItMer� ors h ws aw /r1+K t htpl+ car a CbNbnL A'hnk Arid+ Nt Ballow we at assume PIM one hr t1r WOMMs � rMnwlrq MYtDat asMMMW rth M+r i�+Ooosvwap�W�IMe► A paR Of tea WMd �+ Ma11M Opt aWMW alb Y wisio"W 1t a Mont and awMOMO Wow warldeO • dr arraaTsl ARLW mod+ loold +lees Y h awaas SO Y+t MMAWatsr �R1O 1Towr/+ Ms wi: aM nt M a/eMrN for Ibftn tam. wmplie W& t WWA ClIgodiTM � O or imids iaalw ae1d=lb �aMira 4+tiYQ r t fir asrwlo0d ku 1aMto "b Wvw t art 41 a �. ✓lid+ Maa+eMt aorsoMO lrwr" oft; Y e!t/ aye r1d Ogft rr� area a erorrMl fir at ud bra of Pena mftftb 1 ► rim �� ara�pM r! ih+OpM �pW A Nov✓ Mt atuQgM aMeitMni�O h r+id+ oarloh MrraaWMAt w 1wewod b r+ooMMtlw UaatinpM +rM ✓Mat► staler or �11aaC sweat as urka ft Tto OMWO «vft wimp go w ft pnrpaMM at hMasfrlp edtlnoM, � •1ins glkbif I"ba TWA �� and abnarw is4 A W* atNote !fir an1M[ WMKWIW naagoom plea✓ w oMaalr+M+p a �MMtar h Ltd+ w" too!► p and aMpsrrWara .hl+6ea.1r► pW 1t a ift WAMW CA. OOV �i babU ThY OR M ant It ldit a an1M1 arsaiw at air Megy r M. rrdPt *UK IPA no e+M WW% an was" go wrdd M wo dmd r Iiesf SWbftLftn of UP rtP�!vim �� �t rrd tM d A dwo pAw a dt+rlsttllr+q Wd NOW fill attar W4 t»� � Wlo dMWOV4 MI, olr+�wsMora A trnMat ! f� bm o own to MOM� O� M SOMA 09 a"tti M OW&oprtanW�C y atRteir. iMM+► of IN olrwea: LA al b Old Iddoo tier A d M fan -of Wso ON n M, ► ialdsirn of araaNc rMr 458mo tyres bmsk I low. r �a SWNM � Lam+►_ �P+ i lomE o� r~� . & die at �rlt altrlrW � al4a/� lsssra A` aQaan pwblilM aMiablM aaft, arwr+raMd aafr w+r W nol ONVOW cad Ib+atAat wMtawlrr 1raMttMrla t1� Y / Ira !ir Pn�nMt at Mllirsa PMiMhlr� A aMii ItAor► fir ad fir cat flw PM t to FL A.alMpt d tawn+ra foitii MMroe+rry W CM1wt i. A dwin Pest LMt t~ tMrafar at 60 6001 ato ob Prot b 10 M tin r awdwr far GOWO t~ Mateo. fir Mr awM: MM=lh oPogo y aedr► two Y trdalMQ tw a prMllaQa�t pow d its; tt bona fb dolooerb of to Mltiair w+t aaret hb Aldrdld M+epo aatlltlta. rRRd► rM► atli"o► h 'r� p+�larr+ iwv"t tlaMa �rMstMt fir aaR0liat awals. f1d�+d1+P ova W d+MlrrM. cacao d �1i+n• t aoMhi�lYn w ark MPnlr0. Ite+s. �t�t taw tar fir 1�d""a�b M M< pMt� /hi s. M a'd' Mp nb M or dldr iMka,atsb+4M, 1�ralan ar+ie eoc ir+isi oai/rc eedbftktW ltrt a r � . w qr AMr. A Ob:d •satM+Met Mt rarna i a a+MWttl M1d+ az ✓Doty+ tberM or cad Mar M1tiiA .estM.atMr Y rtAnrlMi A car t�Wrr rvY on rt+tot+ neat of bst"raan W vid N nit sow. Aim we ttidrlr+0 Molar Y o1r .�hiol+ Y 4rtky+MO r � at ar+t r twr 1Mdd M�► aw: TAof as& of ON36 ri % }'sat idfid T0�af�, A p foe b what+ M MM�t UWW"or amM icaP ProO�aM elf* Mai *aft a L*M a WAV meti�uafr� adl�ra h � i„vM, yM pt� at Aar l4MSMa 01nA��rt ��i�i► ais Qat +�O1M MM M U Ma SSW Prow Wnr ebmw 0 Ord ali+4t pow r `pa■d ir asdtllra