NC0034860_Wasteload Allocation_19801014

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCAVION
RoWing on Reverse ide
Facility Name: �— , Atlde2 Ift 0S Date: AZIIELZ2A-
County: AreY"eiL Permit No.: AI000344(go Pipe No.: 001
Receiving Stream: titj 1 F-tic cotee,K Class: nC
Design Capacity (NPD): O.QOc Design Temp.: �C/ Requester: .y� fi6l—yJ1Y�O
Sub -basin: 03-08-3Z. Drainage Area:
Other Stream Affected: A
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Wa Qualiry
"es'f1<. wA-.7
eq �trter-r' I -I I SZ
i-nco` ('s�vT-14ro.•s 7Q1C:. r
Class:
Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt.
Prepared by: alt{ .e^/ Reviewed by: �� Date: 1
Is -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCAYION HuuVlnq On I4evur:e Idu
v
l'uc:i.l.lty Namu: yyCrlel a/L S llatu:7i7c�}1/ICJ�_z
County: AL4e)(# �e/L- Permit No.: /JC0cole186o Pipe No.: 002
Receiving Stream: M"J �4 F a.IC CtLeQ K class: 1 G'
Design Capacity (NUD): D.294 Design Temp.: 2, 0 i Requestor: .c Jgw� h6f —wylep
l0 1^ 47 L
Sub —basin; Qi.�"D$-32 o2 Drainage Area: '�:efi'mt` ( �.14ZO-434zo.a3 7Q10: � s.
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent o. nr•r Quulir Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.) =
,ilT-'r /.00w. IJAi�e_
a_ 1
,A 11
Ill 1 1
Ili• 1
�
MM
������
�_
Prepared by: \ �¢� I�c�(//L�� Reviewed by: �// Date:
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCAVION
Rowing on Rcveise [do
Pacility Name:: CAnzid02 1%OS Date:
County: 0yogAe(C- Permit No.: AICV(03!�8(co Pipe No.: 003
Receiving Stream: tlL dj r+tIC Cvtee e- Class: Van
Design Capacity (NGD): 0.016 Design Temp.: a °G Requester: ji✓2. Ndk—Ml&
(,. - pi , z/ (Asts SMVOu !. � 2�
2 Sub —basin: (03"08-3Drainage Area: Io.—f-—nco` L oz.14zo.43 7Q10: � s.
Other Stream Affected: Class:
7,
Limits (circle one): EM111r o � Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
I.7TP �e.V..e.t
Prepared by•, � , Reviewed by: Date: ) ,`� / �---
C ! r
IS -3/78

NFIDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
HoWing on Revoiso ide
FaciliLy Name: :5ckycld`Z /`lilyL Da Lc:
Count y: Permit No.: 64'V(o318(,n Pipe No.: a04
Receiving Stream: mjj Rovoc erteel- Class: rC/l
Design Capacity (NGD): C),I8) Design Temp.: �� I �G Requester: .dam/r- /4--YJrY/i p
_.�.o.. . -7
Sub -basin: 03- D 8 - 3 2 Drainage Area: -S—Q rvc� /l o Fao-a 3 7010: _
Other Stream Affected:
Limits (circle one):
-TP4
Class:
Effluent or(war•r ouo 1 Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
III • • •
� 4
�__�-�
__
wimp
�W_�___�____
Prepared by: Reviewed by: - Date: e I
i
i
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Reuling on Revorse Ido
Paci.lity Name: c ld:@R, /yIns Date: np?' ?7&)ZQ,4
County: nleyowe/L Permit No.: 6160r03!Z86p Pipc No.: 0or
Receiving Stream: tlLjj r>2C Cteee,
�/ Class: rc
Design Capacity (NixD):O.00DoL Design Temp.: r� J� Requestor: `� 9Ye /,roG y —Y�/%p
Sub —basin; ®3' D 8 - 3 2 Drainage Area: a—of—„�-` � oa. 147A WI 7Q10:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
7 ��!�.S
Limits (circle one): Effluent or water Quollty Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.) r�
_Six,_. r.,noayr
li• 1
�
i
���
�_i
='I
I
Prepared by Reviewedby: Date: 1
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCAVION
huu'Inij on Ilavou;e Ida
Facility Name: nO Af+1��< _ MILe:
County: a14,sJeL< Permit No.: NGI%/0.3e18(,pT Pipe No.: 006
Receiving Stream: Class: t,a //
Design Capacity (WjD): 0.00r Design Temp.: 2qJRequestor: qcg/✓e. / ^M7
�- -) U Set SMroN I . S i
Sub -basin: 03- 08 - 3 -L Drainage Area: M. 0 2. 14 z0.43 7Q10: tL
Other Stream Affected:
Limits (circle one):: Effluent
or ar•r Quali
Avg. Stream Flow:
Class:
DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
Effluent
MonthMonthlv Averar,.e
W v Average
I-b�x. Dnilv Ayf,,.
MUM
M'. '
Characteristics
Cone.
Load
Cone.
Load
Cone.
Load._Conc
Load,
Conc.,
Load
D
Fecal Coliform
isolved Oxygen
Total SS
H (range)
-
✓ NGVG
II
UI CLc
P �"','";
✓G'!!/FP
- .�'/'P/�
.1C
/(�
P �I
c�,� ✓C...
d
ab ove
O�l"t/✓red
✓
N <�,?i`r- ;:'P�
G: �1 /.-
99 °C
i
( I
Prepared by: \ /JI Vice - 1� -f -t- C n �./ Reviewed by: _T%/� Date:
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Rou'inq on neverso ide
Facility Name: d1 Mejd&/Z It / S Date:
County: AIeyowe12. Permit No.: &0(03118Gp Pipe NQ.: 007
Receiving Stream: Huaati r+tic CriealC Class: Iron
Design Capacity (NOD): 0.008 Design Temp.: a 4JC/ R questor: yz 9✓e 6V —, 1Wleo
I , ' (ASES SM721 �
Sub -basin: 03-0 -3� Drainage Area: $a} ,r.t` ( oz.14zo.a3 7210:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water quolity.-' Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.) • !: r
I L' Lz 1.I-�A—a . r. t-- T�
ICI
��
i
•
•.•
•1 �
•.•
�ai
•.
••i
Prepared by� ����U �� -�`� l�i''t Reviewed by: ��w Date: _!
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCAY10iV
Rou'inq on Revor:;e Ide
Facility Name: Y�C�nt,d4! /iii%< DaLu:Z74
Cotuity: A►aYA ��2 Permit No.: 4epO,3e186e_ Pipe No.: 009
Receiving Stream: Ntji Class: t C
Design Capacity (WD): 0.O00Z Design Temp.: 4-t Requestor: J44+1e Nd —wy/?o
u SCS JrM7t0�
Sub —basin: 03- 0 8-3 2 Drainage Area: � �` o l.14zo.a3 7Q10: _
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or water Oualit Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
c
I
Prepared by; (Y�.suX �= p a,r2 Reviewed by: -' Date:
IS -3/78

September 17, 1980
< n-P -�3t
{� }a �. �•;"- •t: r ; i. ; ;s ki
V l flit Lj�
Mr. Rex Gleason -
NC Division of Environmental Management
PO Box 950
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Subject: Wastewater Characteristics
Schneider Mills
Taylorsville, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gleason:
906.014(34)
As per the meeting in Raleigh on September 3, 1980, with the North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development, we are submitting to you data on the
Schneider Mills wastewater discharges. Sources for the data include NPDES permit application,
testing done by Division of Environmental Management personnel, compliance evaluation
analysis, information from Schneider Mills and independent laboratory testing done for mill
personnel. Only data obtained during 1980 were utilized in the evaluation.
Total plant production at Schneider Mills is presently 759,581 lbs. per six day work week and
the plant utilizes eight discharges for its waste. They are as follows:
001
Sanitary waste
002,
Jet loom discharge
003
Water filter plant backwash
004
' Jet loom discharge
005
Sizing water (washdown of slashers)
006
Cooling tower and chiller water
007
Boiler, cooling tower, fire pump
008-
Charcoal filter backwash
Discharges 001, 002, and 003 are permitted. Sanitary waste is treated by means of a septic tank,
surface sand filter treatment works before discharge through outfall 001 to the Muddy Fork
Creek. The water filter plant backwash water from outfall 003 is treated by means of a a settling
basin before discharge. Currently, only discharge 001 is in compliance with permit limitations.
As requested, the wastewater characteristics data is being submitted in two forms; individually
for each discharge and combined as anticipated for the construction of treatment facilities.
C Brien & Gere
:Ec< 3855I801 East Boulevard /Charlotte. NC 28203 / 70"1-3741-1822
;-:;cston, MA / New YorK, NY I Philadelphia. PA I Syracuse. NY I Wasnington, DC

Page Two
Mr. Rex Gleason
September 17, 1980
Discharges 002, 004, 005, 006 and 008 are expected to be combined as are 003 and 007
Sanitary waste will continue to be treated by the septic tank - surface sand filter system and
discharged through outfall 001.
It is our understanding that discharge limits for the proposed combined outfalls will be set within
30 days of the receipt of this information. If you have any questions regarding this matter or
require further information to complete your work, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE, INC/ENGINEERS
�9;' - r 7&'/�
D. E. McKee
DEM/jhp
Attachments
cc: Mr. C. H. Reed
Mr. Albert Schneider
O'BRIEN & GERE

Schneider Mills
Taylorsville, North Carolina
Wastewater Characteristics
Individual Discharges
Discharge No.
Waste
Characteristic
002
003a
004b 005
006
007
008a
Volume - gpd
294,000
10,000
181,000 20 5,000
8,000
225d
Temp. (Summer) - OF
60
60
65 - 200
58
Temp (Winter) - of
50
45
87
58
pH - s. u.
8.0
7.5
5.5
5.5
8.0
6.7
BO D5 - mg/I
100
25
110 40.1
90
COD - mg/I
250
<10
.3,100
30
30
TS - mg/I
100
95
2,900
TSS - mg/I
15
47
220
2.0
290
0 i I & Grease - mg/I
20
24
Fecal Coliform - per 100 ml
30
Phenols - mg/I
50
NH3 - mg/I
0.10
17c
TKN - mg/I
0.40
43
-
P - mg/I
0.05
10
Fe - mg/I
300
3500
2500
Pb - mg/I
C 100
< 100
< 100
Sn - mg/I
< 5000
< 5000
< 5000
Cu - mg/I
< 40 _
120
Al - mg/I
200
400
Ni - mg/I
< 100
/,,100
a. oil & grease, fecal, conform, phenols, NH3, TKN, P and the metal concentrations for
discharges 003 and 008 would be the same as normal background concentrations.
b. characteristics of discharge 004 are the same as those for 002
c. the only data available on discharges 005 and 006 for nitrogen and metal concentrations is
from a composite sample
d. 225 gallons for 3 minutes an average of twice a week.
O'Brien & Gere Page 1 of 1
906.014 9/80

SchneiderMilis Wastewater Characteristics
Taylorville, North Carolina Composite Discharges
Composite
Discharges
Waste
Characteristic
003,007
002, 004, 005, 006, 008
Volume - gpd
18,000
480,000
Temp (Summer) - Fo
60 - 120
60
Temp (Winter) - Fo
50 - 100
50
pH - s. u.
7.7
7.9
BO D5 - mg/l
54
�; 99
•
COD - mg/I
203
248
TS - mg/I
180
99
TSS - mg/I
155
15
O i I & Grease - mg/I
11
20
Fecal Coliform - per 100 ml
—
30
Phenols - mg/I
—
49
NH3 - mg/I
—
0.28
TKN - mg/I
—
0.85
P - mg/I
—
0.15
Fe - mg/l
1,100
333
Pb - mg/I
45
100
Sn - mg/I _
2,200
600
Cu - mg/l
53
40
Al - mg/l
—
202
Ni - mg/I -
44
98
O'Brien & Gere Page 1 of 1
906.014 9/80

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Rowing on Reverse :.Ide
Facility Name: �—
nCfd&/L )VI<
Date:
j2nn ezfe 2n
COmbi.W.�
County: fyfaYAr
�YY
ut Permit No.: A16V J3486p
Pipe No.:
d07, o_ 4. ooGy
Receiving Stream: 1'91,.JJ�
4 rr<IC CRee.i�
Class:
uC
Design Capacity (IUD):
0. 8v Design Temp.: T Requestor: .ter gvp- yd
--➢I yloy
Sub —basin: 03- 0 8 - 3 -L Drainage Area:
Other Stream Affected:
Limits (circle one):
_._7
Effluent or Water Qualit
b -1 " (A� SGS VA7'0 I. S 2
--&t mL' ( 0 2. 14zo.43 I 7Q10: C S.
Class:
Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
Ili:••
♦
%.�
_�_��_.
_■�1.��1�[fllfLL•.Tt��
/
�L!�lt*�i'1
r
NL0
/.'
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Date: a 1
IS -.A/7R

PJPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Rou'illl,� on Reverse Ido
facility Nanic: Mfj,94 It Us Date: J`-R7r?+1/1zk--�,
County: A1aYd e/L Permit No.: AIOV(0314!6o — Pipe No.: O oOL_
Receiving Stream: t1tAja W%+tee! 949,
.�_ Class: re t/
Design Capacity (NOD): 0 OI Design Temp.: � oL Requestor: Jkv� 9/ --Y3V/zo
Sub -basin: C)3-08-32. Drainage Area: 1d�>,. oz.i4zo.a3 7Q10:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or wor•r puotie Avg. Stream Flow: _ DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
Prepared by: Y1,� I �W f !NY (/�Qit� Reviewed by: //U Date: I o 13 c�ti

1
6419
'opq/�o
iW
Schne'ider- Cnillb - nludd.t, Foy
vioy: 14Zo.333�
11b
v
o
C7
5wo �3
e4-S
p
pq,61M�
1
9�ro c 1.52 c-(s
ex
13,5 r�� •`���
1r'18 f.51
�® omdG -fit= �'118)C151�rlb�a�= IoS2
10

r
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 15, 1980
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rex Gleason
Mooresville Regional Office
FROM: Forrest Westall, Head
Technical Services Branch ///l���'
SUBJECT: Effluent Limitations
Schneider Mills-Taylorsville, NC
In reference to Rex Gleason's memo to Forrest Westall dated September 23, 1980
Technical Services has completed its wasteload allocation analysis for the
several discharges of Schneider Mills to Muddy Fork Creek. For purposes
of modeling, we have "combined" discharges 001, 002, 004 and 005 due to
their proximity to one another and the relatively high BOD5 concentrations
per O'Brien and Gere's effluent analyses. A total allowable BOO loading
to Muddy Fork Creek was calculated based on our Level B stream model. We
then assigned "secondary" limits to the relatively small domestic discharge,
substracted out its loading contribution from the total allowable loading,
and assigned the other three discharges equal concentration limits (21 mg/1
BOD5) based on a CBODultimate to BOD5 ratio of 3 to 1 (typical of many
textile wastes). The BOD loadings from each pipe could be allocated in
other ways, of course, as long as the total allowable loading to the
stream determined by modeling is not exceeded, and the 3:1 ratio is used
in assigning BOD5 values.
The remaining dischargers were assumed to contain negligible amounts of
BOD. The wastewater characteristics listed in the O'Brien and Gere letter
for 007 show 90 mg/l BOD5 and 30 mg/l COD. COD is a measure of the total
oxidizable organic material present in a sample, while BOD5 is a measure
of the amount of material that can be biochemically oxidized in 5 days.
Normally the COD concentrations is much greater than the BOD5 concentration.
We have assumed, therefore, that at least the BOD5 measurement is erroneous
for pipe 007. This is further evidenced by the fact that 007 is non -process
wastewater.
P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r
-2-
Also note that discharge 003 was assigned limits based on it being a water
treatment plant effluent. Pipes 006 and 008 were assigned limits in order
to protect applicable stream standards. In no case were any of the
discharges assumed to contain concentrations of metals that would cause
water quality violations during critical 30'day 2 year low flows in Muddy
Fork Creek. Note that we have assumed the reported metals concentrations
to be in micrograms/liter, not milligrams/liter as stated in O'Brien and
Gere's letter. If this assumption is incorrect, allocations for water
quality limited metals will be required.
If you have any questions, please call.
cc: Mark Lewis
Ed Gavin
0

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 23, 1980
MEMORANDUM TO: Forrest Westall C
FROM: D. Rex Gleason IDP
SUBJECT: Wasteload Allocation
Schneider Mills Co.
Alexander County
I have enclosed the request from O'Brien & Gere, engineers for Schneider Mills
Company, for various wasteload allocations at the Alexander County facility.
There are eight (8) discharge points currently at Schneider Mills Company, all
discharging into Muddy Fork Creek. There are no Federal guidelines covering this
industry. The wasteload allocation will therefore have to be based on water quality
in the receiving stream.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Enclosure
cc: L. P. Benton, Jr.