20051393 Ver 2_401 Application_20071218

1V~itchell environmental, ~'.A.
P~iID
Transmittal -
Date:
12-18-2007 7 co ies o S- 1 3 g 3 Y 2
To:
Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 WQC Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone Number:
792-4200
From: 1`d~/
Pete Colwell /Scott Mitchell
Re:
Rowland Meadows PCN Application Package
Comments•
Attached are seven copies of the PCN Application and Check for $240 for
Rowland Meadows Phase III Thanks.
~~ ~ ~~~
~~
u~ C 1 b ZOn7
~~~:~ - v~r~i ~s ~uA~.'s~rY
'iYEYIACdu3 ~;~T S`'n~ag4"!.#~R c~kAt~!C4i
PO Box 341 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile:[phone]

•
Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
_ _..__
December 17, 2007
Mr. James Shern Ms: Cyndi Karoly
US Army Corps of Engineers DWQ - 401 WQC Unit
6508 Falls of Neuse Road 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 120 Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Rowland Meadows Subdivision {Wake County -Neuse River Basin)
Pre-Construction Notification Application for Phase III
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly:.
~~~
p, ,~
~" ~~P~~n ~'~~~~~
•~ ~4y F"~~3 r,~d
-, _
Attached is a complete PCN Application package for the proposed Phase III of Rowland
Meadows Subdivision. Rowland Meadows is located off Dwight Rowland Road. just north of NC
42 in southern Wake County. Phases I and II are currently under construction and include 89
single family home sites on 79 acres. Phase III will add three additional home sites on a 17 acre
parcel at the end of Rolling Tracks Road just west of Phase IL
Permanent impacts permitted for Phases I and II included 0.36 ac of wetlands, 691inear feet of
stream channel, and 13,616 spft of riparian buffers (USAGE NWP #39, Action ID. 200521326;
NCDWQ WQC #3402, DWQ EXP # OS-1393). In order to mitigate for these impacts and to
protect the remaining wetland areas within the early phases, 9 acres of wetlands has been
placed in a conservation easement.
lii order to access the developable upland in Phase III, Rolling Tracks Road will be extended
across a small intermittent channel with adjacent wetlands. The road crossing will impact 0.13 ac
of wetlands, 80 linear feet of stream channel, and 6,090 sgft of Neuse riparian buffer. An
underground water line will be run along an existing. sail path from the neighboring subdivision
{Rowland Pond) to the lots in Phase III. The soil path crosses through wetlands and another
stream channel. However, no additional impacts are anticipated since the water line will be
buried within the existing path.
Any compensatory mitigation that is required for proposed permanent impacts will be provided
through the preservation of additional wetlands, streams, and buffers within Phase III.
Approximately 12.6 acres of wetlands, 1,2231mear feet of stream channel, and 2.8 acres of
riparian buffer 'ill be put into a conservation easement similar that used far earlier phases.
Do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the attached PCN
application or if you need any additional information. Thank you.
Sincerely, ""~ -
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS

1 ' .
=~:. 1 f~-~~.
~f
~ z:~~
u~ ,,' ' ;~
-°- ~ ~
G~
Office Use Only: Form Version March 0~
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ S- l 3 g 3 v~
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".1
I. Processing
~ I
Check all of the approvals} requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ~ ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
II.
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Numbers} Requested: Nationwide Permit 39 and 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because writterj approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP; complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for' further details}, check here: ^
Applicant Information ~~w ~~ ~ `-a -~ ^~
~ ~~ ~~'~
~~~ i.,~
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~.' ~_ C ~ X007
Name: Holland Road Inc (Attn• Douglas Ball)
Mailing Address: 1401 Aversboro Road r.~~~,.~ - vVA1.cR c~uAt I (Y
Suite 20b ~~~
Garner North Carolina. 27529
Telephone Number: 919-772-3929 Fax Number: 919-772-3437
E-mail Address:_ Dou~las(a,BallRentals.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.}
Page 1 of 9

Name: Scott Mitchell •
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental P.A.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 341
__ Fuquay-Varina North Carolina 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: Scott MitchellEnvironmental com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly deftned. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Rowland Meadows Subdivision Phase III
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0677813450
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town:.. Fuquay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Rowland Meadows
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From intersection of
Highway 401 and NC 42 in Fuquay-Varina proceed east on NC 42 to Kennebec Road Turn
left (north) onto Kennebec Road to Dwight Rowland Road Turn left (west) onto Dwight
Rowland Road. Turn left onto Rolling Tracks Road after approximately 1/10 mile and
continue to the end of the road Phase III is throug~,h the woods line and across the stream
channel to the west.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5940 °N 78.7363 °W
6. Property size (acres): Phases I and II 79.23 ac Phase III 17.3 ac' Tota196.53 •
Page 2 of 9

• 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Terrible Creek; C; NSW; 27-43-15-8-(1~
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h?Q.c~~r.;,t_~ttc.tl~.~a~/~cl~~~ni13i~~ia 1s1.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Phases I and II of the subdivision are currently under
development with roads and lots Phase III consists of the remaining_portions of the
a~-icultural field and forest on the ro e~rty
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will install infrastructure necessary for a new subdivision for single family
homes !roads, water suhhly electricity telephone etc 1 Individual sin le family homes will
be constructed by others upon the completion of installation of required infrastructure
Equipment used to install infrastructure includes bull dozers track hoe excavators pansx
rollers. havers. etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to create a
new subdivision of sineie-family homes on the subjec~ropertv
IV. Prior Project History
• If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. A USACE Nationwide Permit #39 (Action ID 200521326) was issued
for Phases I and II on December 29 2005 The corresponding NCDWQ_ Water Quality
Certification 3402 and buffer authorization !DWQ EXP # OS-1393) was issued on Janua_rv 5
2006_ and modified on February 2006 The authorizations ap roved permanent wetland
impacts of 0.36 ac temporary wetland impacts of 0 1 ac permanent stream impacts of 69 lnfts
temhorarv stream impacts of 36 lnft and 13 616 ~ft of Neuse r~arian buffer In order to
mitigate for these impacts and to protect the remaining; wetland areas 9 acres of wetlands has
been placed in a conservation easement
V. Future Project Pions
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justif cation for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Phase III currently represents the extent of the property holdings adiacent to the Rowland
• Meadows subdivision. Therefore we are not aware of any future plans for additional
development related to this,project
Page 3 of 9

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State •
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include one
road crossing that will impact wetlands and one buffered stream in order to access the remaining
uplands on the t3roperty. The water line for part of Phase III will come from an adjacent
subdivision and cross a second buffered stream channel along an existing soil path The water
line will be buried within the existing pathway No additional clearing will be needed and the
original contours through the path will be restored
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to •
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number T e of Im act
yp p
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Flood lain
p Stream
(acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
5 (Permanent) Road Crossing Forested No 0 0.13
6 (Temporary) Water Line Crossing Herbaceous No 0 0
21
(existing soil road) .

Total Wetland Impact {acres) 0.34
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 25.5 ac for all
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560. •
Page 4 of 9

•
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on rna)
Stream Name
Type of Impact .
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im ct Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
5 (Permanent) Uf to Terrible Crk Road Crossing Perennial 2 80 0.004

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 80 0.004
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred~in~, floodin~_ draina~e_ hutkhea~ls Pty
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
T e of Im act
~ P Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, hay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
None

Total Open Water Impact (acres) None
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nr~;Prr~
•
Stream Im act (acres): 0.004
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.34
O en Water Im act (acres): None
Total Im act to Waters of the U. S. (acres) 0.344
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): gp
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): No new ponds are proposed as part of this project
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
• Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 5 of 9

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) •
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
f nanciai viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. AIso discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All nrot~osed impacts are needed to access upland portions of the pro~perty The road crossing
and water line crossing are as close to perpendicular as is t~racticable An original design to
extend Western Lodee Trail from Rowland Pond across a larger area of wetlands and connect to
Phase III has been eliminated. The water line will follow the existing soil path from Western
Lodge Trail thereby minimizin impacts to forested wetlands and riparian buffers
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shad be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
~1:Ca~ sl.~'_ ;~~ ,~ .•7-ir,• 11~~1'i~~', 't i ~~°_~7ri:, ;,[i~i% ~ ~ri~ ~_:%ii,l.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite}, affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed {restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a •
Page 6 of 9

• description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Wetland stream and Neuse Ri arian Buffer reservation is ro osed as miti ation for
proposed uermanent that may reauire miti ation (Impact Area #S only) There are
approximately 12.6 acres of forested wetlands tas approximated by soils mapping in Phase
III. Wrthm the wetland area is 1223 linear feet of stream channel and 2.8 acres of ri arian
buffer that will also be reserved. Refer to the attached Phase III ro osed reservation
drawing.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at l~tt~:~:l'f3f~~-s.€~r~f .t~t~~:,.~~c us/y.~-ri~i~~:pci~ .l~t~~i. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
• IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3, If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the appIicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9

1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 1SA NCAC 2B .0233 •
(Meuse), 15A NCAC ZB .0259 (Tar-Pamlico}, 1 SA NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 1 SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* (square feet) Multiplier ~~~
Road Crossing
l 3,396
2 2,694
Total 6,090
- c.vne ~ exienas out 3u ceet perpenaicuiar from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional ZO feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i. e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC ZB .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Meuse Buffer impacts resulting from the extension of Rolling Tracks Road and the water line •
crossing are allowable under 15A NCAC OZB 0233 The road crossing will impact
approximately 60 linear feet of buffer The water line will be buried within an existi~soil
path through the buffer and no additional clearing will be needed
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Within Phase III the proposed road will create an additional 0 2S acres of impervious surfaces
surface coverage at full build-out of 3000 ft` per lot includes house driveway accessory
structures, ratios. walkw s etc.) means 0 21 additional acres will be covered by impervious
surfaces. The sum total of these proposed impervious surfaces is 0 46 acres or 2 66 % of the new
be directed to level spreaders or flat natural forested wetlands for treatment prior to entering
protected Meuse Buffers.
•
Page 8 of 9

• XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage from single-family homes in this proposed residential subdivision will be treated and
disposed of by individual on-site septic sXstems as permitted by Wake County
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project {based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
I~~t~~~ /i~,a~c~.~~77~.st~b~c.r~c.E~/~lc~~~ctiara~l~. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
• XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Page 9 of 9
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

SEP-6-2005. 12:28P FROM: T0: 7723437 P:2~4
B. Scott Mitchell Lnviranmental ~'onsulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY CURRENT i,ANDOWNER
Name:
Phone: __.. ,
Project Name/Description: j~ ~; I ~,,, ~{ M t ~ci~ ~,~ s Suh ~~~ /; sl'_oy-~
Date:
'lie Depattrnent o£ the Army
US 11rmy Carps of Engineers
Wilmington District
P4 Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Field Office: IG~Lc ~'~ / ..HU/G/y,%
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting 8z Permitting
'I'o Whom It May Concern:
T,-the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize B: Scan Mitchell Em~ronm~ental
Consulting to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward. This the
~ day of __~E,f' i Ern ~E.,2
7"his no ' - upercedes any previous correspondence conce the agent for this project:
PRINT Owner's Name PROPL ?Y Owner.'s Signature
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Kamly
NCDENR -Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
.5601 Ma~Ric~ Xun Lune Fuyuuy Varinq North Carolina 2752eS
Office; 919-557-~~i82 Fax [phone]t K3 rLtvhle: 919-tG9-(1329

T
l l
.I
1•. II
II
~ I' - ~
~ggao,N -- .1-- - --'- ----- -~--- .
i ~ ~
N~+
'~
`I~
~a~
''4?.
yq~

+~~
r '.1'. ~~~ ~
11
~~ ~ 1
~ ' ~`

35 1
{~ ,Ar ,~

= I.
n.}~~,
,' I:
'~ ~ ~
S ~~M
,,~. II
;.
~!: I~
~ Triple W =~ `
~ h ~ I, ,.
• .-~ .. l ,
_.
~ ~. f~
L .,. ,
. \ ::
.a,.~~..
r
N ~ ( ~
. .
.,
~~ j
~...
~I - ,
,~ , , . i
~ ~ ~~
~'~-
l ~ ~/~ - r /_ .r.
~_ __ - - t `~.- ~.I~ ~~~ i -
i5 I
tf
~~ j ,°
~~ I. ,~ r
. , ,~ j, e• ~~ - ~1'`~' ~- per
' I ~ ' ~i~
}
/" ~~, ~.
. -
~, ~ ~ ~ ,~
.. ~ ,,,Y ~' c.r~
._ ~ ~ ~
)rinKn ~ • ii ,111 ~ - ~'~'. y~ >f ~.. i ~ ~' St Anna Ch r
u rf ~ ~ "-w..,~ ~ W
I. ~ j'
fi I if ~ ~ tf .~f~M 3''B
~~ Il-~ ` - III f ~ ~ ~ 4k ~'::
'.l ~ % ~ ~ ~~ ~ "~ ' i~ ~; I. , ~~~ .. C
:I
~~t :,II I
i;' II
II I ` .
• 111 , '~..
..III -\ '1 ~j "~ ~j _, ~.f ~-

,~,~ '-i r ;"y ~.. . ~ -mac •, ~ ,. .. b '., _. °~` ~C'~~'~`"~ s' ..~ i t ~.
;f "~~•~'v.,~rr~~ ~ ''F1.,i ~!`3 `s,L~''T`~ '!'!Spry- 'y. va,~~~ .... f ,,,(~PJ f""`y+.~..~.` ~ti ~ y f "
'y at ~, '`~ `v~r, ;VOf~ f r~e~~i ~~' ~y ~1~~
~~.~`p Fj ~.w y ~„ r~ .l{ ~ .:Y~d 1 / F r~ ~~ ~f7 ~'' ~.:-..-- 1;9~j"r4 '.~,
'
r •
'h ..,,.
c„ i~ ~ f ~'h F t.`.
~~ .n ~ ~ ~~
°. ~ x~ ~ .. ~ ~ ...... '.! ~ ~ x t~~ ~ ~' ` -~_ ` ,~ t j -:, tEi~ int. ~ * ~, s5'~ ~.:. _._.''~
~ L - `,~
d! ~. S
~ ~ 'Jd,t ~ ~ ~ !'V,~~ft:I~r33Y :~r t ,#, y ~'~~~ ~ ~',~" \1 40.' ~ v
~ ~ -
.., ''
4 ~ r ~ S ~` P ~~~~~` ..Sft e~~~ F;c,..Y~3~,~ ~ysri ' ``^'° f~~ .7 ~ ~ [~' C, ~ P.YJ~. ~~• }
r. "jo i~~~ zx :.:a I' ~u S r;f,< ~ '^ ".!r'l~' r~~ u ~ '~V r '~.: ~..~~Pa; -~ -.
4
~ ~ ~ ~; fie''.. (ri ~ ~~ aA~~ ~at3 r ~ l 1
u
# ~~
L..d:.. " ;Flci :4 aXi f `'ti /J y ti'4 y`
.,
„~, ~ ~ r'~ 1N a a ~E4V ,;
f`. •~.,~ ~: ~; ~' tiVr#3`_ i ~ `r'" .~r° "'<,' ~ ^,~Ed " .~,t ~#P~~l~t ..~~~'~wb:
f v? 1`V a
s. 't,~ 4
~ *i-. ~
ti s °. r P +
1 P ~
: ~ b,
~. r:.
~Y , ~ ~<.~ `,vY3i~ w ~ htaF~ ~ m~`~-
F Y F S~ti~~ , _ ''.. ~ r ""ti
t}
n
\ __ ~•
~'4~
v 7i __ 111
a ,~+~ ~ ~`
~ .' r'` ? -.~ - lra ~` i'ScaAl.~_..._ ,=r !~ .~'' is ~~ e Wa?'.!`~.k/ /
t }" ~ ~` `~'¢ ~ }~ }+ r,. 3„. il:,~ ~~~'dr]A i ~ ~ h" ~ - .ice
~' ~ !~ ~.. '-{ "" ~ ~~^ q " } ~:: ~ 1^,_ `,~ .,v is ; # - f ' U
a s + '~,. x _ ~t ` ~~, d~1^s+w` s ~ . w ~ „y! u..l i3:. ~ ,! }~h :. ~F,t ~Yb,..
r~~ r.C rY" ``.,~ *u" Y /'~ {~ ~~ mot,, F ~ _
~ ~ V ~
4+15 -' t-,.„ ~ ,. >
•.: }, '°'~, t ~ ~ hrs.:. * ~'` ~~~,~ ~~ ~...-,° `°+; :- ~ r ;, rJa ~`~' yy ,~ ~ .3~& t ~~ t fit #~'! ~-, r11~^tA.~
h
,».. s ` ~ .
_~^ ~,
~. a
,,,_~,~ ~ _.~; {i ~ r~~ 1, _._ _ ... .. ~r \ ..»1 ~ ~ ; ~ . ,
~:fC~7 `1 NGFIJ 9 ~ fit' ~~ tQ~.~ ,.,,, ~y ~~s. ':! + ~i.
..:
e gt k,^~y?'Zx •ti,~,p~-,, } ''~., ~t'Y"~+"~ 'r`~~` 'i ~'`~, l~ ~""'~ `' ~ ~`iY,{~ ``~ 4~ t / ~s
~' ' . ~ ~ -- _. ~- `v- k 6 ~ ~ ,~a F4 . .;~'`;:s t "'~ - Y u .r - r '~ .; Stl3i~ + ~ _.
C
--L-:~~-++.,. + ,,.~,, til j }~ '"~ A1rt: SF''t 3 ~' ~ .f' ~ ~~``i' { \ J ~ '! ' ~.e. ~ ~ i
Nr ~ q1"?. '', t 1~
~~ ~ .,,~ ! 1 ~lt~l
yf twr: 7J ~...-a~` t ~r ,~ 's .' ~ ,. ~'V ~~. ;~~ ~ 1~ ~,t~i ~ rw ~ is ~"°"w: ~,~~` „~ ~ a:fft ~ ~; ~" °" }'
... i ('' T ! l f;. _ ~ .~"ixC :' '' ~'.~e~,f'f .a ~a ~ ~iG `~ ~":. f t _ ~ ~' _ sY " .3,~ ~,,. `~ +~:`.
k~:.; ~, 7~'~tl ~ F'.. '+..,~'~ __a~-3 ~5 s ~~?src'1"` ,~_.-. { ~~r f ~'u~ ~'.~^ -.._..... -,~ ;, .. t ~``y ~. h~- ~,~ ! ~: /r
L.~• ~ ~ .'+S"a+ta.3'~,r.:~.-;_~ dX,T,,"r,''-°e fie. 1 ~ q- i ~, ~ a r ~ _
.tslt~l3.# "-.~ ,:-t. `1-:i...~ j.~.. .„,~+ ~ .,..~: s,,..,~ ~S .~..i".~i' Fh,!`.tads.._ ..:z?y~d"':` "'y~ J,~.."'?'~..1.~- .'~9"_"`''_'~`x`", ' - ^"..t. -,t -r i„, e~
cE3 r 1 l~ ~~a 4 el''~ad' t31"Sz."~- Y4~. r csrx Fi ~f{ .-..-.~,~ ~ ~Y .- ,~'`~'+,f~ ~~,... 'i'd' ~ ~,, #yi ~ - ,h#r"~•ry„~t,.-..~'}.'~F+i-s~"'~ ~*r~~~ ,~~p~~,, _.
a.:°

0
0
I I
ui
U
V1

O

uu
^
^ ,
~/ u
u
^^
J
`^
;
O ~

~
• VJ u
u
1~
J ~ r~
1~
/ u
1~1
`

~~ •
^
~ ''^^
Vl
~
O ~ J
^
IA
)
~0
~~yy~
(n ~C
W
Q U
~~~ H O
Z
U ~
5 O
Z
MITCEELL ENVIRONMENTAL. P.A. P'~'~ED Fes: R 0 WLAND MEAD 0 WS
lYollarad Road, Inc.
p.o. aox 341 % Doscglae Ball RALEIGH, NC - A'AKE COUNTY
FUQUAY VARINA, NC 27526 ua~ oEC. ~2, zoo7 scams: see Above
OFFICE: 919-557-4682 0 VERALL MAP
FAX: 9>9-557-4683 Sod sa~+nsr caraTacr:
mdtohellenvironmentaCcom. ~0n "9~"~'- ~~ ~~ Phase I, II, and III

Rowland Meadows -Phase III -Two Proposed Impacts:
1. Stream Crossing - 801f, including 62' RCP pipe and 18" Rip-rap dissipator.
- Total impacts to Neuse Buffer & Wetlands = 0.27 acres
2. Waterline Easement - 569 if following existing path
- Total (temporary) impacts to Wetland = 0.51 acres
Scale: 1" = 400'
i
N
i
--
....~
PHASE III F
IMPACT
.AREA #6 --
i
-. o ,. ,-
IMPACT
i ! AREA #5
i_
-' - -- - ~
-. - ~ ~
'
II
~ f

~- j
A.

Ii
I

V. ~[ITCHELL ENYIRONXENTAL. P.A. P R ~~ Rom, lam. R 0 WLAND MEAD 0 WS
P. o. Box 34f % Doaglas Ball RALEIGH
NC - SAKE COUNTY
FUQUAY VARINA, NC 27526 ~
' ,
o~TE: oEC. Iz. 2ooz sc~LE: ~
_ +oo
OFFICE: 9 f 9-557-4682 OVERALL
FAX: 9 f 9-557-4683 ~~ SCIENnsT caHrncT:
SCOTT MITCHELL
PE
~
Phase III
mitcheLLenviranmental.com ,
,

Proposed Impacts ,for Road Crossing:
[] Streams = 80 if (including 621f for pipe + 181f for rip-rap)
[] Neuse Buffer Total Impacts: 6090 sgft (0.14 ac)
[Zone 1: 3396 sgft (0.07 acres), Zone 2: 2694 sgft (0.06 acres)]
[] Wetlands: 5,700 sgft (0.13 acres)
* LODA =Limits of Disturbed Area
Y_ d[ITCEELL RNVIRONMENTAL. P.A.
~' FUQUAY YARINA, NC 27526
OFFICE: 919-557-4682
FAX: 9 f 9-557-4683
mitoheUsnvironmerata~. oom
PREPARED FOR:
Holland Road, Inc.
Douglas Sail
DATE OEC. 12, 2007 SCME: 1' = 50'
Sql SC~ITIST CONTACT:
SCOTT AIITCHELI, PE, LSS
R 0 WLAND MEAD 0 WS
RALEIGH, NC - FAKE COUNTY
IMPACT #5
ROAD CROSSING

ROAD CROSSING IMPACT -DETAIL MAPS
Total Neuse Buffer Impacts: 6090 sgft (0.14 ac)
r--
moo, -~/
Neuse
~ ~ ~ Buffer ~
~ '%' ~ Rip-rap
~I
dissi ator
P
~ __ - `
~ ~ ~/ // _
'Lone 1 '
"~ w" one 2
one 2a
Is~7~n
..
~_
~~.
_s~_ ~
Jurstictional
Intermittent
' ~ Stream
i
J ~ Jurstictional ~'~
~ _ _ ~ Wetland"~~~
Proposed Wetland Impacts: 5700 sgft (0.13 acres)

XITCRBZL ENVIRONMENTAL, p.A. ~~° FoR: R 4 WLAND MEAD 0 WS
y' Boiland Rood, Irtc.
P.o. aox a4f % n°'~~ B«~c RALEIGH, NC - A'AKE COUNTY
FUQUAY VARINA, NC 27526 oAr~: oEC. ~2, 200 scAl~: ~' _ ~a'
OFFICE: 9f9-5S?-4682 IMPACT ~ ~ #6
FAX.• 9 f 9-557-4683 SOIL sa~nsT CONTACT:
mitclae~lerevironmentaLcom SCOTT MITCHEU. ~~ ~ DETAIL

Proposed Impacts for Waterline Easment:
Waterline to be installed under existing path
[] Neuse Buffer -Zone 1: 0
[] Neuse Buffer -Zone 2: 0
[] Wetlands: 9,348 sgft (0.21 acres) -Temporary
~. b[ITCAELL ENI?RONIIENTAL. P.A. ~g l~y-.d Road, Inc, R D WLAND MEAD D WS
P.o. Box s4f % nouytas Batt RALEIGH, NC - A'AKE COUNTY
FUQUAY VARINd, NC 27526 o~TE: oEC. ~2, 200 scu.E: t' = so'
OFFICB:9f9-557-4682 IMPACT # 6
FAX.• 9 f 9-557-4683 SOIL SgEN11ST CONTACL•
mitcheU.environmental.com scow MI~EU. ~~ ~ Waterline Easment

i
Rowland Meadows -Phase III
~~ ~° ~b Proposed Preservation Map
~~ m~
~ ~~ e° [] 12.63 ac Wetlands
~' ~ .. ~e
~~ ~~
~~ [] 1223 if Stream
j~ci,
~~ ~
[] 2.8 ac Neuse Buffer
a w~ n
~ N
ru
v~
4 ~ c o Note: Soil Type boundries indicated below are imported from Wake County Soil Survey map. Scale: 1" = 220'
c a ~ p
J ~~ '
R i .
~ A
m ~ ~ ~
~' i GAS ~~a~ ~ ~ « ~
Deh~eaho~ , VY`etla~til
~, -
. 5
,i ~
I~
1
~V VV
.^ ~ St~ea~n,
~ DCIi~Sehtion ~
~ ~ ~ ~~/ ~ c ~4. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Ot
~ GIS tream ~ ~ i ~ 6~~~ Q1C ~ ~ ~ 9f t
h.~ ~ ~ ~~ f Deli~teahon - - -- -. „~~'y ~ 3 ~ S C 0. ~ ~ `~~~ 1
~ ,y ~ r r
~ ~~ ~~~ 2,21 ac - Ra
~/Q~ ~; !
~ ~.
,~
O
~'~ ~ ~ '~ ~aB ~Y
~,, O d Boarders of
O Delineated &
b ~ ~ Flagged
Wetland Area
Soil Series Symbols &
Depth to seasonally
high water table
LY 1.5 ft
Ra 0 ft
WaB & WaC 10+ ft
Wo Oft
-- --- Stream points from Wake Co. GIS
', GPS Delineated Stream points
__-~

~5-13q,3Y2 ~~
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
•
-pp----- /
Date: l f ~/ 0 ~ ProjecC I~i77W~p ~ pr lu~'q~Ortif Latitude:
Evaluator: P Cd l w2 l~ Site: C~~H~B ~ ~ longitude:
Total Points: (~ Other
Stream is atleastintermittterrt 2, y County: (~~ KQ e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or renniai if 2 30
A. Geomo holo (Subtotal = l ~ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 9 2 3
4. Soil tiexture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 .5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1:5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
~ No ~0
Yes = 3
-Man-matle drtdles are not ratetl; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal = S 1
•
14. Groundwaterflow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water inchannel - d or rowin season 0 1 ~ 3
16. Leaflit~r 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris Q 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = ~ 3
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0. 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0:5 1 1.5
26. Marxobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in sb-eambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
ttems 20 and 21 focus an the presence of upland plarrts, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:

Notes: (use back side of this farm for additional notes.)
Man r~R~~c c ,L ~,c~~ I ~'~- ~ti w0~~/
we~lar~

Glz~w~~~~
~ USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) 1
;,~,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following inpformation for the st/ream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant'sname:_ Rpw'a~ ~~coidWS 2. Evaluator's name: /`"r ~o~~e'!~
3. Date of evaluation: II ~ /~~ 7 4. Time of evaluation: IO; ~(~
5. Name of stream: U T ~'o T ~N~ 17'x- (.. Y'ee~ 6. River basin: Neu 5 ~
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: ~ ~'
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ r70 F ~ 10. County: wu ~ ~
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):_
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other G1S Other
13. Lo,cation o~fQre/ach unde~r}~e'valuaytion (not/e nearby roads and/landmarks/and attaach map identifyLing stream(s) location):
~110~ O~ I \0! 1 i ~l ~I !NAG !i S ~01~ D{~~GYi~N ~ ~Gr~lAk~ /i~~ e~{f ~ 07 /MHO G/Rf
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ~/OKS
15. Recent weather conditions:- ~ t- ~
16. Site conditions at time of visit:-- _ _ ~2 %n iii n ~ o~~ ys a74
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~l [f yes, estimate the water surface area:
• 19. Does channel appear on USES quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: a~ % Residential _% Commercial ____% Industrial 6Q % Agricultural
?0% Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: ~J ^y>~ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ,Z~'t
24. Channel slope down center ofstream: -Flat (0 to 2%) /Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight /Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): J 3 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature / Y G~'~~~~"' Date ~`/~~~7
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist Landowners and environmental professionals in
'gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from -the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval end dotes-not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919=876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

#
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
SCORE
Coastal .piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream

(no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max rots 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max oints

3 Riparian zone
•
0 - 6
0 - 4
0 - 5 3
(no buffer = 0; cont
ous wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 4
extensive disch es = 0• no dischar es = max oints
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 Z
no disch e = 0• s rip s, see s wetlands etc: = max oints
~
~ 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 - 4 0 - 4 0 - 2 ~
(no flood lain = 0• extensive floo lain = max oints

A''
~ Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
Z
dee 1 entrenched = 0• fre uent floodin = max rots

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0 - 6
0 - 4
0 - 2
no wetlands = 0• lar a ad
acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 2
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max oints)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive d osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 Z
fine homo enous = 0;1 e, diverse sizes = max oints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5 2
dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
,~".,
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5 3
~ severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable banks = max oints

14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 3
E,, no visible roots = 0• dense roots thro out = max oints
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
substantial im act ~• no evidence = max oints
16 Presence of ri81e-pooVripple-pool complexes 0 - 3 0 - 5 0 - 6
E~ no riffles/ri les or ools = 0• well-develo ed = max oints
d
1 ~ Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6 3
~ little or no habitat = 0• li• uen varied habitats = max oints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5 U
no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 - 4 0 - 4 2

d 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max •
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 2
~ no evidence = 0• commo numerous es = max rots
V- 21 Presence of amphibians 0 - 4. 0 - 4 0 - 4
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints
~ 22 Presence offish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4
~ no evidence = 0• commo numerous es = max oints

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max rots
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) , j 3
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Narth Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
bate: „ ~ ~ ~' Protect:
Evaluator: ~ G'~l u~8 ~~ gib;
Total Points:
Steam is at feast intermittent 2 Z , S COU nty:
if 2 19 or nnial if ~ 30
~~~tiv1 Nle~~vr~s i.a~a,ae:
~KKQ~ ~ Longitude:
~ //~~ Other
t/(/Gf ft.~ e.g. Quad Name:

•

R. Geomo hoio Subtotal = Q
18. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Weak
1' Moderate
2 Strong
3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits p 1 2 3
9 8 Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi '
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No --~0
Yes = 3
W1gn91R7uC. UIluI65 d!4' rror rar@O, se-e7a~swssions in manual
R !-{v[tminnv iG~ihtnt~l c !. _S ~
14. Groundwaterflow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, gr
Water in channel - d or rowin season 0 1 © 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0. 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = ..5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 6 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
~~ Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macxobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamer>tous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Weiland plarrts in str'eambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
•w••N ~~ a„~ ~ . ,..,...~ ,,,~ u~a N,ex~rt=r vi uyiana Fnari[5, m:m cy rowses on me presence or aquanc or wenantl plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) ~ ~q n ~
~} A t r ~'
1UJGtn wiap~G ~Y ~G~Ps ~ ~ We t a:~~. ~orvY+
V`'l/~in G ~iq h r~e~
i
t
~.
a
o~~~'
- ~i ~G
~,,,~~+`o ~o~
t
~ / ~ ~''~
1n ~'
~i~~ 1
'1
1,
eta ~ `
We i

GtiakHe 1 !S
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,,,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -
r°
• Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ~Oy/~Art~ M°~~dw5 2. Evaluator's name: ' r Gd (tee l~
3. Date of evaluation: l ~I ~ I07 4. Time of evaluation: ~~~~~D
5. Name of stream: (~f T fo '~e%yi ~t/+~ G~P>o~ 6. River basin: IV2~f 5e
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~0~0~1~
1 l . Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
8. Stream order:
10. County: Lf/q ~~°'
I2. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -72556611): ___, _ _
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS. Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
E~ o~ ~o~~«g ~"r~aro~ts ~ol~ off{ /~~r;,~~vrv~a~.to~ /~"o~~ ~as7c of Fuy~ray
14. Proposed channel work (if any): lend C ~'Of si H ~J
l5. Recent weather conditions: ~r ~/
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 1~2 /~a~i u 2 ova yrS a~r7
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: 'Section 10 -----Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
,,,Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18.1s there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
~19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES N 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial SS % Agricultural
~~ % Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: '~ ff 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~~~
Z4. Channel slope down center ofstream: -Flat (0 to 2%) /Gentle (2 to 4%) ,-Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meandei -Very sinuous -----Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g:, the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of-the
highest quality. / ~ /
Total Score (~rom reverse): "l ~ Comments: G Ptah Rer ~ r/O)11f~t®/'~~'s ~Y`a~.+'1 Se(/2v~/
Evaluator's Signature /' t!~~t!~-~°`~ Date ~ j~~~~7
his channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
athering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

ECOREG ION POINT RANGE SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow I persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 3
1 no flow or saturation = 0• stron flow = max rots
Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 f
2 extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max rots
Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 2
3 no buffer = 0• Conti ous wide buffer = max rots
Evidence'of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 4 ~j
4 extensive dischaz es = 0' no disch es = max rots
S Groundwater discharge 0_ 3 0_ 4 0_ 4 3
no disch e = 0' rin s s wetlands etc. = max oints
~ Presence of adjacent floodplain 0_ 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
6 no flo lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max rots

Entrenchment / floodplain aceess 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
a+ 7 d I entrenched = 0• uent floodin = max oints
Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 2
8 no wetlands = 0• laz a adjacent wetlands = max oints
~ Channel sinuosity 0_ 5 0_ 4 0- 3 ~
9 extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max oints
Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
10 extensive d osition= 0• little or no sediment = max oints
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5
11 fine homo enous = 0• lar a diverse sizes = max oints
Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
}, 12 dee 1 incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max oints
E Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5
~"
''
-~ 13 severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable banks = max oints

Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5
14 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu out = max oints
~ Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5
15 substantial im act ~• no evidence = max rots
Presence of riffle-pooUrippie-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 Z
16 no riffles/ri les or ols = 0• well-develo ed = max oints
F Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 Z
H 1 ~ little or no habitat = 0; uen varied habitats = max rots
~ Canopy coverage over streambed 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5
18 no shadin ve elation = 0• continuous cano = max oints
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0- 4 2
19 d 1 embedded = 0• loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5
20 no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max oints
~
Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
Q 21 no evidence = 0; commo numerous es = max oints

22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4
d no evidence = 0• commo numerous es = max oints
~ Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
23 no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max rots

Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter: on first page) ~
* These characteristics are not assessed m coastal streams.

C
•
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
..Date: f' /~ 07 Project yi~'~~ ~~pG~ON/S Latitude:
Evaluator: ~ cdlw~~~ Site: GG~uK,~e/ G Longitude:
Total Points: Other
stream is atleast/ntermittent 2 ~ County: ~~{ ~Lo
if 2 19 or rennlel If 230 e.g Quad Name:
~ , r-
•
•
A. Ge0m0 h010 Subtotal = ! `~.J
1'. Continuous bed and bank Absent
0 Weak
1 Moderate
2 Strong
3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 8 Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts _
0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or dreina eWay 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on xistin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes ~3
•-•a•~~~p~Q..~.W~a~ 4~0,~~.,a.eu, see aiscusswns m manual
B_ Wvdrnlmv fcuhtntal . ~ 1
14. Groundwafier flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowin season 0 1 © 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1 5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils {redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biolosty (Subtotal = ~~ Jr ~
2 .Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
n• Crayfish 0 .5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaXungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
•--•••- -- -••- ~ • •~w~ ~•• w•o F..~.~~~w v~ uM~a~'u p~a~ns, ue,n ca rocuses on me presence or aquanc or wet~and plants.
Sketch:
Notes:// (use back side of this//form for additionla~~ notes.} '
[,~ t~GlNr1 e I KJBlOW GOvt(I~121~1CE' C~ /-J ~l7

~USACE AID# ~ DWQ #__ D 5 - t 3 ~ 3 Y 2 Site # (indicate on attached map
;,,,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
.Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /CG ~/la~ d Nl eaa/o ws 2. Evaluator's name: / ~ Gd(~e~/
3. Date of evaluation: ~ ~ ~ D 7 4. Time of evaluation: ~ / ~ 30
5. Name of stream: (/~ 1 ~d ~ ~ v r ~ _b ~ G ~'{~~ 6. River basin: MQ u S ~
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 204 f
ll. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
8. Stream order: ~ '~
10. County: lea K'e
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. -77.556611
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach m p identifyin stream(s) location):
_ ~ v~d o f ~o ~~,`-~r~ 7~~~ ~"~ lPo~ ~ ~~{ ,diyi 9 Li f ~o'~,r/la ti~~~~ 2u~~ ol~ l- ~..rr~~r
14. Proposed channel work (if any
G cos
15. Recent weather conditions: ~~ G' y
16. Site conditions at time of visit:- ~Z /`ai ~ ~ d~t~~ ~t ACS
17. Identify any special waterway classificationsknnwn: -Section 10 Tidal Waters ------Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters ,Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES zU If yes, estimate the water surface area:
~9. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ~~ NO Z0. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ~ NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ~% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial ~~% Agricultural
?~% Forested ,_% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: ~ ~ f 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ~ "J' l~f
24. Channel slope down center ofstream: -Flat (0 to 2%) !,Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander TVery sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. ~,/
Total Score (from reverse): ~ "/ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature r, t'Q-~~w~""' Date ~ `l ~! 07 __ __
his channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
athering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

#
CHARACTERISTICS' ECOREGI4N POINT RANGE
O
SC
RE
~ Coastal .Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 ' j
no flow or saturation = 0• stron flow = max rots
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max rots 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5

3 Riparian wne
=
0 - 6
0 - 4
0 - 5 2
no buffer
0; Conti ous wide buffer = max Dints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
extensive dischar es = 0• no dischar es = max rots
5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
no dischar e = 0• s rin s s s wetlands etc. = max Dints
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0_ 4 0- 4 0- 2 2
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max Dints

A ~ Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
'' de 1 entrenched = 0• fie uent floodin = max Dints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2
no wetlands = 0• lar a ad
acent wetlands = max rots
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max rots)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
extensive d osition= 0• little or no sediment = max Dints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - 5 '~
fine homo enous = 0• lar a diverse sizes = max Dints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 Z
~ dee 1 incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max Dints
'~"'' 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 3
a severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable banks = max Dints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 - 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 Z
E,,,, no visible roots = 0• dense roots thro out = max rots
~
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5 '
substantial im act ~• no evidence = max Dints
16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 Z
E no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0• well-develo ed = max Dints
~ 1 ~ Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 3
little or no habitat = 0; fr uen variedhabitats = max Dints

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
no shadin ve etation = 0• continuous cano = max points
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5 3
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0- 4 0- 4 Z
dee 1 embedded = 0• loose structure.= max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0 - 4 0 - 5 0 - 5 Z
~ no evidence = 0• commo numerous es = max Dints
~ 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O no evidence = 0 • common numerous es = max Dints
''~
22 Presence offish
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 4 1
no evidence = 0• commo numerous es = max Dints

23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- S 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max rots
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL: SCORE (also enter on first page) L~
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

,,pp~ 1WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version I ``©©
• Project Name loo r~/Uthp~ ~1/1Pat~©~ti'S Nearest Road ~ (~~ ~ Tv~.r~ f /~~
County I~/A 1~~- Wetland area ~ acres Wetland width /0~ feet
Name of evaluator /~ ~io(w~// Date t /~~ ~v ~
Wetland location
_ on pond or lake
_ on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
•
Soil series•
_ predominantly organic -humus, muck, or
peat
~ predominantly mineral -non-sandy
_ predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topogaphy
ditched or channelized
?total wetland width > 100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within'/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
_ forested/natural vegetation ~4
-agriculture, urban suburban ~Q_%
_ impervious surface
Dominantpvegetation
(3) 7 rpP 1~.c r
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
~/ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)R
_ Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
`Wetflat
_ Pocosin
_ Bog forest
•
_ Pine savanna
_ Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
Ephemeral wetland
_ Carolina bay
Other:
The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage 2 x 4.00 =
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 = ® Wetland

T
Pollutant removal
~
~ ** x 5.00 = ratin
I Wildlife habitat Z x 2.00 = ~ ~ 3
N Aquatic life value Z x 4.00 =
G RecreationlEducation / x 1.00 = 0
** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >l0% nonpoint source disturbance within ''/s mile upstream, upslope, or radius