Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240684 Ver 1_USACE More Info Request_20240614 (5)Baker, Caroline D From: Homer, Seren M Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 4:01 PM To: Homewood, Sue Subject: FW: [External] Request for Additional Information: SAW-2021-00677 / 238 Ritters Lake Road / Greensboro / Guilford County / commercial Seren Homer (she/her) Environmental Specialist II, Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office Office: (336) 776-9698 1 Cell: (336) 403-4684 seren.homer@deg.nc.gov ����ND oauaamam of Emimnmen W I Dual Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Meyer, Laura J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Laura.J.Meyer@usace.army.mil> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 2:39 PM To: Taylor@williamsdevelopmentgroup.com Cc: Brad Luckey <bluckey@pilotenviro.com>; Homer, Seren M <seren.homer@deq.nc.gov> Subject: [External] Request for Additional Information: SAW-2021-00677 / 238 Ritters Lake Road / Greensboro / Guilford County / commercial CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab. ALCON, Thank you for your Pre -construction notifications (PCNs) for the proposed 238 Ritters Lake Road in Greensboro, Guilford County, NC Project (SAW-2021-00677), received on May 9, 2024. The following information is required to complete our evaluation, confirm compliance with one or more General or Regional Conditions, and/or complete consultation with another federal/state agency to verify the use of the Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 (Commercial and Institutional Developments): 1. Per General Condition 15, the activity must be a single and complete project. a. For non -linear projects, the term "single and complete project" is defined in 33 CFR 330.2(i) as "the total project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers." i. With the submittal of the Project J PCN, located within the same property parcel boundaries as the 238 Ritters Lake Road project and has not been subdivided at this time according to Guilford County, impacts proposed for the two projects will be considered a single and complete project unless further justification can be provided. Current cumulative impacts to potential waters of the US (WOUS) for the 238 Ritters Lake Road and Project J single and complete project include a total loss of 0.3922 acre of wetlands and 0.0074 acre (52 linear feet) of stream channel. Please note that single and complete projects are evaluated cumulatively with respect to compensatory mitigation and Nationwide Permit thresholds. b. A project is considered to have "independent utility if it would be constructed absent the construction of other projects in the project area. Portions of a multi -phase project that depend upon other phases of the project do not have independent utility. Phases of a project that would be constructed even if the other phases were not built can be considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility." Please provide updated plans for the 238 Ritters Lake Road and Project J projects to include all infrastructure (utilities, stormwater, etc.) for the 238 Ritters Lake Road and Project J submitted PCNs. These plans are necessary to evaluate whether the two projects have independent utility from each other. 2. Based on the proposed grading and re-routing of drainage into stormwater ponds, the project appears to eliminate the drainage area/hydrology source for a portion of Wetland WD. Based on LiDAR, the current surface area draining to the head of Wetland WD appears to be approximately 4 acres. a. Please provide justification that sufficient hydrologic input will be maintained to these wetlands. Common designs include routing approximately equivalent surface water/runoff area to these locations, altering locations of stormwater outlets, usage of French drains where appropriate, etc. b. If maintenance of wetland hydrology is unable to be justified, the Corps would consider these areas as reasonably foreseeable indirect impacts (see NWP General Conditions "District Engineers Decision") resulting from a loss of hydrology. In such cases compensatory mitigation may be required for indirect impacts resulting in a loss of hydrology and therefore aquatic function; compensatory mitigation is typically required at a 1:1 ratio for such indirect impacts (although may be situationally up to 2:1), depending largely upon aquatic function (e.g., North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method [NCWAM]). c. A monitoring plan (typically including groundwater monitoring wells and visual observations for a period of 5 years post -construction) to document maintenance of wetland hydrology may also be proposed for Corps evaluation and approval; such monitoring plans would also include a contingency plan, typically including compensatory mitigation, in the event that monitoring does not indicate maintenance of wetland hydrology. 3. The November 3, 2021, Detailed Schweinitz's Sunflower Survey is noted within the submitted PCN; however, as the survey was conducted over three years ago, the survey is no longer valid according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) (North Carolina's federally threatened, endangered, and at -risk plant species I U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (fws.gov). Due to the potential habitat identified in the 2021 survey report, the Corps requests an updated survey be conducted for Schweinitz's sunflower, during the optimal survey window (late August — October). Following the survey, please provide the survey report to the Corps (copy also the Service) for review. Of course, if you do not believe that any suitable habitat exists in the Action Area for these species, please provide a justification so that the Corps is able to evaluate the potential for a No Effect determination. 4. Additional information has come forward regarding the potentially Determined Eligible historic resources on the property. We are considering the information concerning 106 consultations with SHPO with our regulatory archaeologist. As soon as additional information is identified, the Corps will inform the applicant regarding requirements for consultation pursuant to the Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). 5. Please note that responses to the questions above may prompt additional information requests to allow full evaluation of the proposed project. Please provide the requested information within 30 days (July 12, 2024), or your application will be administratively withdrawn. To clarify, if the requested information is submitted after the 30-day timeframe, you will not be required to re -submit an entirely new PCN (unless otherwise specified). We will continue to review and/or process your permit application upon receipt of the requested information. Sincerely, Laura Laura J. Meyer, PWS Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Phone: (919) 634-1595 Email: laura.i.meyer@usace.army.mil rrs.usace.army.mil RRSSYSTEM Streamline the permitting process with the REGULATORY Regulatory Request System (RRS) —your new REQUEST online platform for permit applications. USACE RRS Promo 90-sec (youtube.com) Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.