770003_Routine Inspection_20240627

k#5 #YPNa2 tta85't aY xfY t0.r. iY i#65#F AAti'F44yd #tiv'S&9 #Nd �y((�ry.YY y.{'��/ i. P +•aG .s t9 b .>;+:av 4e xu4'kk%px Ee3 aAi
F#YA#A3?t ry.. 3e Y8fi'#tP 43:?4 i.$%Y f .•ki4`Yn^4N#.d%1tG�l��s£kY .kR¢95 Wtrn5 Cr•e G5 s*}4 R, d. au §'#SYitb Y4+'
X#R rtA§Yk4#ti kook tw*'tf#
k*§Fxa#iS.k i.•ittr #b# !xh#g#.t$n gs i ry 1 p}� �j5+ •�# ,y.} v kP#4u 5#Wk$'
Fa§;#. y�7P]-wy* +YFIY���/'/��Aki 44A•F 6M §. 'S�fi'r �#'R'Ti •}•yka ki a4#��Al `5'£Ax#*t +r#Yak Et.+kb&FOPgx
kk§b#5 x6111kw#Akg4 mUge'4ei>� / �Uk att.�##ktAaT-.tr #�Dy. ¢S A}df£a*ten'C�1J hdta%§ vk:4afi:I+>an{3@5'Pfiti: µl>'
F*k43tkA 4§N " imdtr mxd t$#R#4y A%4. kPR k:X s, #f:ktt baavF.'p3jY§vk4j roy9*ra •m5r Y54 B rr#}8}#t#F e#i fiN#§e a$$464
F$ktAdln 94 b#itii#t..: +}i YiF ax FYRS#6�tf{en EiCenQ`I.4i 413$#i •#"'kIX #Yx.d sp RL }£'-i+§#¢%4
Yi#4#3trA..t >fUkkx#=a •., YRi +i
Type of Visit: .-e'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I^
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ; Departure Time: J I 1t1 County: r egion: leo
Farm Name: � AL �Gu/Ir&. _ 4f Owner—er Email:
Owner Name: T-D A:& ,r C LC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �s2[oy//vt� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ';�';I0 (/ d
Certification Number:
Longitude:
*0+
#•} alrA $'k9k 3i#f Y5.
h1kR88a 8#8Aw90B5�pXfS•
a#auYa 4A'k�d4'S#fiAkkk"96a AdaiMa94n#BYov
RI iY#Pk' ?i 4
7y p �8 Ile(���AS kt�4wa#
#ifYxta 9'a 4YF ffkda xiYR#seYByrn*>fxixi#88#ku
�4p. #R$ak¢s ks8s 6� '�'.�•!#+'x ax#fi}Ax aR a#wpfit Xi4Ap%tk �fi}Ax �hk g$'a,�xiy: Fd
elIl9aURptlBllkq.s#�}.,gR#xiaSaxwe&qxi
d4A8$&ffl Y#xw d
# sA§#d k@P#Pa8404d
11t�, 8 ORYk ttt
8di9i'.{k'm• k#a
#tkatba'8 p�k, aka+
4, a}#68F 8 u. mgtk9Ffa6p at�.a#p a5�'fi9 a#nmik Esro%ee $#tta4�k� n8�� g�gx#9
arE#bx&ag�R�A.�B}m #. re4kM 88 y�.p�yyb wpppy�$ 88t a§#(� p.ag###AF #+t+fi%#FS r}p }Ash p�tk
tt gy &tt�g}'PkS 0 04, &*311 k'`#` it'4p y. ?4Y`+#J OA9k Y1/A d aa#v`b
ak(dl"�ry�jaWkuy+d# u A# 8sY'+k3 P o5'ILn uYta tl a 6 b4
k§R##fl�M1 b24a aik
t}t d8-'E¢ 4d"$'d4 0 Ak **SSW LLYnB mow.,. MPISI!"
vM#4*#Jap a±
Wag4*$$d#kk4 4 $+fir#65§.bdWa.t Jox. si.:s n y3
..WW Wean to Finish
La er
Da' Cow of
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
`y9&0 z
s Dairy Calf
v$. 'r Spa
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
e Da' Heifer
aie��. >h D Cow
'�
Farrow to Feeder
�#
AS Yt d94 AS.
a $ m + a'. Non-Dairy
S Farrow to Finish
a
' Aj Layers
Beef StockerR
s Gilts
Non -La ers'".
Beef Feeder#$
113eef Brood Cow
# Boars Pullets
Aag
r# M1tpk+RkY aRYi AAS Bak
ak +#k r,.zk ka$ aare e%e,iv xA}k WU m'aFa•.a xrYff€a�R r#s Turkeys
#i$'aRae#Y}q#i#TW ik I+F MkO +nk#I .k244.9+5i%N #S �a 44al"AMAi
dlaaro•5 #b^.Y#lX:moldal sw45 &$46 d W#9 Turkey Poults
"ak
9�'AA'ai+4 is #+bY##h beta apnar#a°s kpta}k'ka 4*8fi
,exk�Ya
N.1, 01.1 A$O#k 4.K#xR#9$.R!Pl#$8 bq.Am # R# $ Yg3
Afir'd'y % b4.
saaV##kiaaag
exisawx:k4 a%Fk bfik'etPxi8h 8a m8�Aaa.#.gd
5@
a**,YY#Rx$.��rkSAa„#a#Y>nar<3ik�AaYm*amg a.•wfifiP
a. R4Ea'A tkaxirk1aazAak§mft w4f .Po, B Fk ku #e4Pg
@@#3€##
" 4k
Y
89
tl Other
s
a*
MAW 10«*00 Atr�Yb�a$t�a88§ q,g ABg�d
sy% k # a8 fiw k¢ktg Y+ m t kz 4 P
'$ ak:tF@Y' xam&irfi xi, ara a..a xs4.. u
• a�sxa*&e a<'
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yesv�no ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 'T Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes J21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[—]Yes [—]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes _Z/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ,❑"Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ®"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ©-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ®"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 'n, -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s) �6�e (� / �� ( fc)
( OJ
13. Soil Type(s):� e
14. Do the receiving crops di er from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes J�]­No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 12- io
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes Ofio
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ,]'N
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes „[D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes E2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes -E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []Yes ❑"N` o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LQKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes _Er�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes J2/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes Ef)No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes _E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ,)No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes _L],ko
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 21"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
� / ,/� ' _F_ /iI
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
'p7 t 141110150A)
Phone:
Date: (P/o2%/may
511212020