The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About040035_routine_202406030 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 040035 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWSO40035 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Anson Region: Fayetteville Date of Visit: 06/03/2023 Entry Time: 09:23 am Exit Time: 11:20 am Incident #: Farm Name: White Rock Farms Owner Email: white rock farm@yahoo.com Owner: Roddy Lamar Purser Jr Phone: 704-695-0967 Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Marshville NC 28103 Physical Address: 2346 Crawford Pond Rd Morven NC 28119 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 51' 11" Longitude: 80' 03' 59" from Wadesboro, south on highway 742, L. on SR1003,L. on SR1104 (Hardison Canipe Rd) approx. 1.5 miles east of intersection on Left. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Other Issues Certified Operator: Roddy Lamar Purser Operator Certification Number: 986749 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Rodney Purser On -site representative Rodney Purser Primary Inspector: Katie Fontenot Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Farm had a barn burnt down, The burial area showed no environemntal concerns at the time of the inspection. and the permitee submited a proper mass mortailty notification as well as a burial map to the regional office and the central office. Reviewed: Free board and rainfall waste analysis: 4-30-24 12-20-23 8-28-23 5-4-23 IRR Calibration March 2024 Sludge 8-14-23 Soil Feb 2021 Page 1 of 4 Permit: AWSO4003,' Owner: Roddy Lamar Purser Jr Facility Number: 040035 Inspection Date:06/03/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,200 I 727 Total Design Capacity: 2,200 Total SSLW: 952,600 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 1 02/26/2006 I D3/29/1997 24.00 46.00 Lagoon SOW 02/16/2005 24.00 Page 2 of 4 Permit: AWS04003`. Owner: Roddy Lamar Purser Jr Facility Number: 040035 Inspection Date:06/03/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ MEIEI Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ MEI ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ MEI ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture) Page 3 of 4 Permit: AWSO4003`. Owner: Roddy Lamar Purser Jr Facility Number: 040035 Inspection Date:06/03/23 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Waste Application Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE Corn (Silage) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Chandler Nahunta Cainhoy Emporia loamy sand, 2 to 6% slopes Yes No NA NE ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ Page 4 of 4